ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football The Super Bowl was rigged... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=298098)

vailpass 02-07-2016 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12070574)
Listen Timmy..I watch enough football to know when I see a shitshow. That was a craptastic exercise in formulaic corporate programming...I dont expect you to recognize it. If everyone did...it wouldn't work. Now shuffle off and pretend you are a champ.

Did you see the black choppers doing the fly-over during the anthem?

Hammock Parties 02-07-2016 11:07 PM

So the NFL paid off Carolina's RT to get bitchslapped by Von Miller....makes sense.

New World Order 02-07-2016 11:07 PM

Blackop I'm expecting something epic out of you tonight.

Take time to think and come back tomorrow if necessary.

jd1020 02-07-2016 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 12070581)
I'm willing to say that the nose touches the ground with his hand under it.

So you are willing to say that the ball hit the ground and that he didn't maintain control of the ball. That is the very definition of an incomplete pass. See how easy of a call that is?

GloryDayz 02-07-2016 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ta900 (Post 12070557)
It's just laughable how up in arms people get over a few close calls and then you can totally ignore others. I laugh at the complaining over the it should have been PI on the Broncos, well look at the drive before when Denver was in the redzone on third down. The replay clearly shows Sanders getting touched before the ball gets there and to top it off the other defender comes in and hits Sanders helmet to helmet, but there was no penalty there and not a peep from BlackOps about it. Then you look earlier in the game when Denver gets a 15 yard roughing penalty on the hit on Cam. Cam was a freaking runner that play and he was not down and diving forward and he got hit yet that's worth 15 yards and roughing? Again not a peep from Blackops. So whatever believe your conspiracy bullshit.

Maybe it's the inconsistency?

Who cares, it's sports, it's not real life...

DaFace 02-07-2016 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 12070581)
I'm willing to say that the nose touches the ground with his hand under it.

If that's the case, then the correct call was made based on the current rule. If he hadn't lost control afterward, it would have been a catch, but as soon as he lost control it was over.

Hammock Parties 02-07-2016 11:10 PM

If you really want to pull out a conspiracy theory, Cam not diving for that fumble at the end was a little weird....but the NFL paying off Cam Newton to blow a Super Bowl is so far out there that only the true tinfoil hats are going to even consider that.

GloryDayz 02-07-2016 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12070595)
So you are willing to say that the ball hit the ground and that he didn't maintain control of the ball. That is the very definition of an incomplete pass. See how easy of a call that is?

I said it touched the ground, I didn't say he didn't maintain control. He did.. But hey, you, Donk fans, and one NFL official saw it differently, so that's all that matters.

DaFace 02-07-2016 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mals (Post 12070604)
If you really want to pull out a conspiracy theory, Cam not diving for that fumble at the end was a little weird....but the NFL paying off Cam Newton to blow a Super Bowl is so far out there that only the true tinfoil hats are going to even consider that.

If I had to guess, I think Cam saw his own man coming over the top and tried to get out of the way to make it a clean recovery. Clearly, he should have gone for it, but it's not a completely idiotic decision when made in a split second like that.

<iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/ih6k" width="640" height="640" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen scrolling="no"></iframe>

cosmo20002 02-07-2016 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 12070583)
I don't think the game is rigged at all, but there's every reason in the world for Peyton to win. It becomes this glorious storybook ending they'll replay on ESPN, NFL Films, etc. for decades. Just like they do with Elway. People eat that stuff up. Especially since so many people love Manning.

I agree it is a storybook ending...but is Peyton having a storybook ending THAT important to the NFL? What exactly do they gain?

And whatever it is that they allegedly gain, is it really worth the risks involved in paying refs/players/coaches or whoever to fix the game? The benefit, if any, is tiny, and the risks are enormous.

jd1020 02-07-2016 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 12070610)
I said it touched the ground, I didn't say he didn't maintain control. He did.. But hey, you, Donk fans, and one NFL official saw it differently, so that's all that matters.

Did you even watch the replay? There is no way he maintains control of that ball. None.

DaFace 02-07-2016 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 12070610)
I said it touched the ground, I didn't say he didn't maintain control. He did.. But hey, you, Donk fans, and one NFL official saw it differently, so that's all that matters.

It literally rolled around and almost touched the ground again before he maintained control. That was 100% clear.

GloryDayz 02-07-2016 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 12070600)
If that's the case, then the correct call was made based on the current rule. If he hadn't lost control afterward, it would have been a catch, but as soon as he lost control it was over.

OK, since it's you, I'll agree.

SAUTO 02-07-2016 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 12070610)
I said it touched the ground, I didn't say he didn't maintain control. He did.. But hey, you, Donk fans, and one NFL official saw it differently, so that's all that matters.

The ball obviously bobbled around after hitting the ground, the hand holding it comes off at one point...

vailpass 02-07-2016 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 12070611)
If I had to guess, I think Cam saw his own man coming over the top and tried to get out of the way to make it a clean recovery. Clearly, he should have gone for it, but it's not a completely idiotic decision when made in a split second like that.

That is exactly how I explained it to my son when he asked me wtf? except I added it was a completely weak instinct on Cam's part.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.