ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Major Update on Tyreek Hill [old thread, don't freak out] (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=322529)

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-24-2019 02:35 PM

Florio now saying that thw fifth amendment rights wont save him from suspension

MagicHef 04-24-2019 02:35 PM

So Tyreek is either a child abuser or is protecting a child abuser that injured his son?

TEX 04-24-2019 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225759)
The NFL doesn't have to have proof. You guys simply don't understand how the process works.

I do. That's why I'm not arguing with you, this time...:D

Dayze 04-24-2019 02:35 PM

Florio should stick to horrible football takes.

JohnnyHammersticks 04-24-2019 02:35 PM

Regardless of guilt or non-guilt, the Cheetah has used up the last of his 9 cat lives. If he's not a complete idiot, he'll be a choir-boy for the rest of his NFL career.

I was a big supporter of him getting a second chance after what he did in college, as terrible as it was. Now he's on his own.

BryanBusby 04-24-2019 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225759)
The NFL doesn't have to have proof. You guys simply don't understand how the process works.

It's amazing how much people try to ignore the obvious.

dlphg9 04-24-2019 02:36 PM

Elliot was accused by a woman who sent texts about calling the police to get him in trouble so she could get money and he was suspended. I can easily see Goodell suspending Hill and him doing it mid season so that he misses the playoffs

htismaqe 04-24-2019 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14225756)
My guess is the evidence of the crime is a broken arm with a spiral fracture.

Question is why wasn't this investigated back in January?

It probably was. They've probably been investigating it for months but who knows.

Seems like the whole thing was a media circus from the start.

I've honestly never heard a more useless press conference. The meat of it was the DA interjecting his own subjective thoughts and emotion into it.

FringeNC 04-24-2019 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 14225769)
Florio should stick to horrible football takes.

He's a lawyer by trade.

Chris Meck 04-24-2019 02:36 PM

so, as before, we know nothing except that they suspect someone broke the kid's arm. We don't know if it was Hill, his girlfriend, her mother, some other family member, a babysitter, nothing.

He wasn't even named in the original document, was he?

Sounds ****ed all around.

-King- 04-24-2019 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Hammer (Post 14225764)
means Tyreek's kid did not rat out whomever beat him. That is good. Being a rat is far far worse than being a child abuser.

Lol this is true....well the first part.

TwistedChief 04-24-2019 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14225729)
Good grief, man.

I hope you never sit on my next jury.

FAX

Two things:
1. I know you still think it was Tyreek's mom's hairdresser's uncle's mechanic who did it. Or was it Crystal's dad's barber's accountant's dogwalker? Your theories were always so vivid and colorful, FAX The Detective. You seem much more clued in than the DA.
2. There's a material difference between having an opinion on how something went down and convicting someone in a court of law. I am merely opining on the former.

tmax63 04-24-2019 02:36 PM

Sounds like the DA and PFT are both donkey or dolts fans and are hoping they can sideline the Chiefs WR for a few games to help their chances. On a wider scope, when did it become the norm for LEO and judicial officers to incriminate people when they can't/don't file charges. It's like a last ditch effort to throw a shitstain on someone who they don't like.

Dayze 04-24-2019 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 14225775)
He's a lawyer by trade.

my god.....

are you serious?


that makes it even worse.

staylor26 04-24-2019 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 14225772)
It's amazing how much people try to ignore the obvious.

And it’s amazing how many of you continue to ignore the difference in those cases and this one.

The fact that in those other cases there was a victim actually accusing the player makes it a completely different situation.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-24-2019 02:38 PM

Extend Hill now!! He will never be cheaper

srvy 04-24-2019 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 14225654)
If Tyreek Hill is the prime suspect the information will get out. Some detective will purposely leak to punish a person they can't charge. Police do it all the time, they go to people's place of work and sabotage their career if they can't charge them.

League wont take that chance with no clue for sure who did what because some cops intuition. Tyreek could get a huge payday without even playing another down in football.

smithandrew051 04-24-2019 02:38 PM

My take:

Tyreek won’t face charges, which is good for him.

The DA’s words were very bad for Tyreek in the long term. I don’t see anyway the Chiefs are going to feel good enough about him to lock him up long term. If that’s the case, a trade wouldn’t surprise me. Maybe even very soon.

kysirsoze 04-24-2019 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225759)
The NFL doesn't have to have proof. You guys simply don't understand how the process works.

I agree, but they usually require an allegation. Do you have an example of a suspension like this where there is no direct allegation? I don't remember one.

Not saying he won't be suspended, but it seems fairly unprecedented.

Bwana 04-24-2019 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcjoker (Post 14225695)
My guess is the NFL won't suspend Hill but Godell will literally be waiting for Hill to get caught Jay walking or some other BS and put the hammer down.

Yeah that's the way I see it as well. I also don't see a long term Hill deal in play for awhile either. Clark has to be leery as hell.

CasselGotPeedOn 04-24-2019 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14225784)
And it’s amazing how many of you continue to ignore the difference in those cases and this one.

The fact that in those other cases there was a victim actually accusing the player makes it a completely different situation.

How much money will you put down right now that he doesn't get suspended?

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-24-2019 02:40 PM

NFL can’t do shit. Records are sealed. Goodell get ****ed

Frosty 04-24-2019 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 14225777)
so, as before, we know nothing except that they suspect someone broke the kid's arm. We don't know if it was Hill, his girlfriend, her mother, some other family member, a babysitter, nothing.

He wasn't even named in the original document, was he?

Sounds ****ed all around.

Yep, and this "Hill is protecting an abuser" stuff is all in people's minds. The family could just believe the broken arm was an accident and the over-reacting CPS (that never happens, right?) is trying to make it a crime. No one knows, though, and the amazing leaps some are making would clear the Grand Canyon. :rolleyes:

BryanBusby 04-24-2019 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14225784)
And it’s amazing how many of you continue to ignore the difference in those cases and this one.

The fact that in those other cases there was a victim actually accusing the player makes it a completely different situation.

They don't need an accuser. He has a prior conviction for Domestic Violence.

Marcellus 04-24-2019 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225759)
The NFL doesn't have to have proof. You guys simply don't understand how the process works.

No the NFL does not have to have the same burden of "proof" that the DA does.

But they do have to have some type of evidence that Hill did something wrong. Zeke was suspended because when they did their investigation they found a ton of evidence Zeke personally did something wrong regarding abuse of women even though charges were not filed. There were multiple incidents with multiple witnesses.

If the NFL suspends Hill it will be because they have evidence he committed this act, if they do not then it doesn't exist.

The NFL can't suspend Hill without some form of actual evidence he did something wrong, you are greatly exaggerating how this works.

srvy 04-24-2019 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 14225790)
My take:

Tyreek won’t face charges, which is good for him.

The DA’s words were very bad for Tyreek in the long term. I don’t see anyway the Chiefs are going to feel good enough about him to lock him up long term. If that’s the case, a trade wouldn’t surprise me. Maybe even very soon.

That is a possibility that is up to the Hunt family.

TravelingChiefs 04-24-2019 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225759)
The NFL doesn't have to have proof. You guys simply don't understand how the process works.

So the NFL is going to suspend Hill because why?

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-24-2019 02:41 PM

Unfortunately for the Chiefs, Hill is both untradeable and impossible to extend now, because every team, including the Chiefs is going to think that something else is coming down the pike.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-24-2019 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14225797)
No the NFL does not have to have the same burden of "proof" that the DA does.

But they do have to have some type of evidence that Hill did something wrong. Zeke was suspended because when they did their investigation they found a ton of evidence Zeke personally did something wrong regarding abuse of women even though charges were not filed. There were multiple incidents with multiple witnesses.

If the NFL suspends Hill it will be because they have evidence he committed this act, if they do not then it doesn't exist.

The NFL can't suspend Hill without some form of actual evidence he did something wrong, you are greatly exaggerating how this works.

How will the NFL have evidence when the record are sealed

MahiMike 04-24-2019 02:41 PM

He good?

TEX 04-24-2019 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14225787)
Extend Hill now!! He will never be cheaper

:clap: ROFL

FringeNC 04-24-2019 02:42 PM

Hill is hardly in the clear. The Star buried the guy, almost as if they knew the result would be murky. It makes it harder for the Chiefs to keep him. If he's gone, thank Mellinger and Pryor.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-24-2019 02:42 PM

At least we know Veach doesn’t care what act you commit. You perform we will pay. Just look at Clark

Red Dawg 04-24-2019 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14225794)
NFL can’t do shit. Records are sealed. Goodell get ****ed

Yeah right. They can and probably will. He didn't get a clean bill of health from the DA.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14225766)
Florio now saying that thw fifth amendment rights wont save him from suspension

Why would it? The Bill of Rights protect a citizen against governmental overreach. They have no application in a private setting, such as a place of employment.

Marcellus 04-24-2019 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14225800)
Unfortunately for the Chiefs, Hill is both untradeable and impossible to extend now, because every team, including the Chiefs is going to think that something else is coming down the pike.

Whis is both accurate and understandable.

By all accounts he has issues and she has issues and now they are having 2 more kids.

Its not a good situation.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-24-2019 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 14225810)
Hill is hardly in the clear. The Star buried the guy, almost as if they knew the result would be murky. It makes it harder for the Chiefs to keep him. If he's gone, thank Mellinger and Pryor.

You could also thank Tyreek Hill for beating the shit out of his girlfriend when she was pregnant, thus rightfully casting a pall over his integrity and character.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-24-2019 02:43 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Fifth Amendment has saved Tyreek Hill from being prosecuted in connection with injuries inflicted on his child; the Fifth Amendment won&#39;t save him from a potential suspension <a href="https://t.co/o9nrCScWyU">https://t.co/o9nrCScWyU</a></p>&mdash; ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/1121150044281946112?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

keg in kc 04-24-2019 02:43 PM

Detective Kietzman is now saying Hill is guilty, and that the evil Chiefs don't care.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14225784)
And it’s amazing how many of you continue to ignore the difference in those cases and this one.

The fact that in those other cases there was a victim actually accusing the player makes it a completely different situation.

You're conveniently leaving out that the victim is a minor.

There absolutely IS an accuser, they're just not talking publicly.

Hoover 04-24-2019 02:44 PM

Well it is good news.

Hopefully Hill will get his shit at home together.

I can see the NFL punishing him, but the most I could see if 2-3 games max.

Red Dawg 04-24-2019 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TravelingChiefs (Post 14225799)
So the NFL is going to suspend Hill because why?

Based on suspicion. That's all they need and DA left that suspicion way out there. Just becauee maybe he did it is enough.

Marcellus 04-24-2019 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14225803)
How will the NFL have evidence when the record are sealed

No idea. They may or may not have evidence but you can bet they have looked into it on their own. We will see.

wazu 04-24-2019 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 14225810)
Hill is hardly in the clear. The Star buried the guy, almost as if they knew the result would be murky. It makes it harder for the Chiefs to keep him. If he's gone, thank Mellinger and Pryor.

Tyreek buried himself. He didn't need help from anybody to do it.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-24-2019 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14225815)
Whis is both accurate and understandable.

By all accounts he has issues and she has issues and now they are having 2 more kids.

Its not a good situation.

Yeah. They both need help, but in situations like this, people that need help usually end up finding other people that perpetuate their destruction rather than their redemption.

Bowser 04-24-2019 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 14225822)
Detective Kietzman is now saying Hill is guilty, and that the evil Chiefs don't care.

Sounds like a classic Keitzman meltdown where the result isn't what he predicted.

Red Dawg 04-24-2019 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 14225824)
Well it is good news.

Hopefully Hill will get his shit at home together.

I can see the NFL punishing him, but the most I could see if 2-3 games max.

It's a child case. 6 or more, they won't go light.

Simply Red 04-24-2019 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14225803)
How will the NFL have evidence when the record are sealed

'work at will' - they're an employer.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 14225791)
I agree, but they usually require an allegation. Do you have an example of a suspension like this where there is no direct allegation? I don't remember one.

Not saying he won't be suspended, but it seems fairly unprecedented.

There's an allegation. The victim was a minor which creates the perception of there not being an accuser but there still is one.

JohnnyHammersticks 04-24-2019 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bwana (Post 14225792)
Yeah that's the way I see it as well. I also don't see a long term Hill deal in play for awhile either. Clark has to be leery as hell.

100% correct. From a pure football/salary-cap perspective, as long as he isn't suspended, this "situation" will actually end up working out well for the Chiefs. Hill's price tag just fell off a cliff, at least in terms of up-front, guaranteed money. And doubtful we'll see a bunch of other teams beating down his agent's door for him to sign there and bring his public relations baggage with him.

Bowser 04-24-2019 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 14225831)
'work at will' - they're an employer.

NFLPA powers....activate!




And I'm not defending Tyreek the guy here, just Tyreek the player. But when it comes to either the guy or player, it's not what you think or even know, it's what you can prove. IMO, of course.

Marcellus 04-24-2019 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225834)
There's an allegation. The victim was a minor which creates the perception of there not being an accuser but there still is one.

So any person can make a random allegation and the NFL is obligated to suspend the player? That's how it works even with no evidence?

staylor26 04-24-2019 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225823)
You're conveniently leaving out that the victim is a minor.

There absolutely IS an accuser, they're just not talking publicly.

An accuser that was nowhere around and didn’t even know when the kid broke his arm.

TwistedChief 04-24-2019 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 14225829)
Sounds like a classic Keitzman meltdown where the result isn't what he predicted.

Hate to break it to you guys, but this is how 90% of the country is probably going to view this outside of Chiefs fans.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-24-2019 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyHammersticks (Post 14225838)
100% correct. From a pure football/salary-cap perspective, as long as he isn't suspended, this "situation" will actually end up working out well for the Chiefs. Hill's price tag just fell off a cliff, at least in terms of up-front, guaranteed money. And doubtful we'll see a bunch of other teams beating down his agent's door for him to sign there and bring his public relations baggage with him.

Just sign him now. Could get him for about 10-12 mil a year instead of 20

Sassy Squatch 04-24-2019 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14225820)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Fifth Amendment has saved Tyreek Hill from being prosecuted in connection with injuries inflicted on his child; the Fifth Amendment won&#39;t save him from a potential suspension <a href="https://t.co/o9nrCScWyU">https://t.co/o9nrCScWyU</a></p>&mdash; ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/1121150044281946112?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Woof. Florio telling Pryor to hold his beer.

DeepSouth 04-24-2019 02:47 PM

We won't know for sure what happened until TMZ releases the video to the NFL and the Chiefs.

In58men 04-24-2019 02:48 PM

CAN WE UPDATE THE THREAD TITLE?!?!?

Just take out the press conference time and put (UPDATE: HE GOOD)

Dayze 04-24-2019 02:48 PM

"if this happened and was caught on tape, he's be prosecuted".

riveting take by Kietzman

TravelingChiefs 04-24-2019 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 14225812)
Yeah right. They can and probably will. He didn't get a clean bill of health from the DA.

Did I miss the part where Hill was charged with a crime? Not being charged is a clean bill of health. The DA can literally say anything because no one will ever see whatever evidence there is.

Amnorix 04-24-2019 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 14225849)
CAN WE UPDATE THE THREAD TITLE?!?!?

Just take out the press conference time and put (UPDATE: HE GOOD)


Yeah, except the NFL has made it clear that they don't view it that way. The saga ain't over it seems.

-King- 04-24-2019 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14225800)
Unfortunately for the Chiefs, Hill is both untradeable and impossible to extend now, because every team, including the Chiefs is going to think that something else is coming down the pike.

Huh? They can have an out clause in case of any future legal troubles.

CasselGotPeedOn 04-24-2019 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14225842)
So any person can make a random allegation and the NFL is obligated to suspend the player? That's how it works even with no evidence?

Random allegation? The kids arm was broken you ****ing reerun.

keg in kc 04-24-2019 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 14225829)
Sounds like a classic Keitzman meltdown where the result isn't what he predicted.

He's not melting down. He sounds gleeful.

He loves this shit. Remember the locker room drug ring?

htismaqe 04-24-2019 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14225797)
No the NFL does not have to have the same burden of "proof" that the DA does.

But they do have to have some type of evidence that Hill did something wrong. Zeke was suspended because when they did their investigation they found a ton of evidence Zeke personally did something wrong regarding abuse of women even though charges were not filed. There were multiple incidents with multiple witnesses.

If the NFL suspends Hill it will be because they have evidence he committed this act, if they do not then it doesn't exist.

The NFL can't suspend Hill without some form of actual evidence he did something wrong, you are greatly exaggerating how this works.

I'm simplifying it for the sake of discussion but you know how the NFL works.

The kids' broken arm is plenty enough evidence for the NFL to investigate. And Hill's apparent willingness to invoke to avoid charges could, in and of itself, be grounds for a suspension.

Kind of like the DOT taking your license if you refuse a field sobriety test.

In58men 04-24-2019 02:50 PM

The DA was explicit that he wouldn't discuss whether others were in the home or around the kid. If there was family around or staying at the neighbors or whatever, that widens the pool of potentials considerably and makes "beyond a reasonable doubt" pretty much impossible

Per Seth Keysor

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-24-2019 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 14225849)
CAN WE UPDATE THE THREAD TITLE?!?!?

Just take out the press conference time and put (UPDATE: HE GOOD)

We did it gang!! Tyreek is in the clear! Want to thank everyone who contributed along the way! In8men played a huge part along with BleedingRed and Pugsnotdrugs with his logical takes behind this. Super Bowl!! #Chiefskingdom

FAX 04-24-2019 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 14225780)
Two things:
1. I know you still think it was Tyreek's mom's hairdresser's uncle's mechanic who did it. Or was it Crystal's dad's barber's accountant's dogwalker? Your theories were always so vivid and colorful, FAX The Detective. You seem much more clued in than the DA.
2. There's a material difference between having an opinion on how something went down and convicting someone in a court of law. I am merely opining on the former.

1. No. But even if I did believe it was the mechanic, I reserve the right to speculate while allowing others to do the same. Meanwhile, I sense a disturbing double standard at work. As for being an aspiring DA, I read a bunch of Martha Grimes ... so there.

2. I'm all for having opinions. For example, I have the opinion that Presumption of Innocence separates us from the animals and the Rule Of Law isn't just a trope. That's as easy to understand as I can make it.

Lastly ...

If it's proven that Tyreek hurt his child, you would never see me defending the bastard. I don't operate like that. However, given all the family drama at work in this situation, it's perfectly reasonable to consider the possibility that things may not be as "cut and dried" as you apparently prefer to believe.

To be clear, I don't fault you for having a personal perspective. In fact, I encourage stuff like that. I just wouldn't want you in a jury box judging me ... if it ever down came to it. Depending on the court, the defendant gets a few vetos during the selection process. No offense, but I think I'd use one of mine for you. Look on the bright side though; no dollar-a-day jury duty.

FAX

htismaqe 04-24-2019 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14225842)
So any person can make a random allegation and the NFL is obligated to suspend the player? That's how it works even with no evidence?

You really think they have no evidence?

JohnnyHammersticks 04-24-2019 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14225847)
Woof. Florio telling Pryor to hold his beer.

Florio's been a nauseating little sawed-off SJW for quite some time.

Icon 04-24-2019 02:52 PM

I'm trying to think of other NFL precedents.

Wasn't Adrian Peterson suspended for overly disciplining his son? Or was it something else?

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-24-2019 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icon (Post 14225867)
I'm trying to think of other NFL precedents.

Wasn't Adrian Peterson suspended for overly disciplining his son? Or was it something else?

Yep there was evidence tho

In58men 04-24-2019 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14225862)
We did it gang!! Tyreek is in the clear! Want to thank everyone who contributed along the way! In8men played a huge part along with BleedingRed and Pugsnotdrugs with his logical takes behind this. Super Bowl!! #Chiefskingdom

We’re all family here!!!!!

We good and he good!!!!!!!!!

htismaqe 04-24-2019 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TravelingChiefs (Post 14225852)
Did I miss the part where Hill was charged with a crime? Not being charged is a clean bill of health. The DA can literally say anything because no one will ever see whatever evidence there is.

Being charged with a crime has zero bearing on the NFL process.

Not being charged is not a clean bill of health, not in civil court and not in the NFL.

Or did you completely ignore the part about the ongoing CPS investigation?

MagicHef 04-24-2019 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14225863)
1. No. But even if I did believe it was the mechanic, I reserve the right to speculate while allowing others to do the same. Meanwhile, I sense a disturbing double standard at work. As for being an aspiring DA, I read a bunch of Martha Grimes ... so there.

2. I'm all for having opinions. For example, I have the opinion that Presumption of Innocence separates us from the animals and the Rule Of Law isn't just a trope. That's as easy to understand as I can make it.

Lastly ...

If it's proven that Tyreek hurt his child, you would never see me defending the bastard. I don't operate like that. However, given all the family drama at work in this situation, it's perfectly reasonable to consider the possibility that things may not be as "cut and dried" as you apparently prefer to believe.

To be clear, I don't fault you for having a personal perspective. In fact, I encourage stuff like that. I just wouldn't want you in a jury box judging me ... if it ever down came to it. Depending on the court, the defendant gets a few vetos during the selection process. No offense, but I think I'd use one of mine for you. Look on the bright side though; no dollar-a-day jury duty.

FAX

If it turns out that Tyreek did not abuse his son and is only protecting someone that did, would you condone that?

Dayze 04-24-2019 02:53 PM

man....this has been a lot to take in, and it's stressing me out.
I need to swing by Smoke N Fire to take my mind off of things.

FAX 04-24-2019 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225860)
I'm simplifying it for the sake of discussion but you know how the NFL works.

The kids' broken arm is plenty enough evidence for the NFL to investigate. And Hill's apparent willingness to invoke to avoid charges could, in and of itself, be grounds for a suspension.

Kind of like the DOT taking your license if you refuse a field sobriety test.

LOL ... I was 100% with you until that sentence.

Conflating the Department of Transportation and the National Football League has my head a-spinning.

FAX

Bowser 04-24-2019 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 14225851)
"if this happened and was caught on tape, he's be prosecuted".

riveting take by Kietzman

Well you don't ****ing say, Kevin. Lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 14225858)
He's not melting down. He sounds gleeful.

He loves this shit. Remember the locker room drug ring?

Oh hell yes I remember all of that. I do believe he said it would "shake the NFL to its foundations", or something along that line.

He's probably just happy his ratings are soaring for the day as people tune in to find out what was said about Tyreek.

duncan_idaho 04-24-2019 02:54 PM

Did the DA specify the injury this was about?

Because what I’ve heard is about injurIES far more egregious than a simple broken arm. Injuries that make what AD did to his son look like kids play.

srvy 04-24-2019 02:55 PM

I would be willing to bet we all have had co workers that were under investigation for nearly the same thing and we never even knew it. The employer could but but no charges they better look for other reasons to get rid of them.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.