Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14227484)

Guessing the DA and prosecutors are going to let CPS do the dirty work to gather more evidence if what others have said is even remotely true

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 14227483)

They probably just can't charge him because his wife won't testify and they don't have a case without her.

Some info (such as photos) will probably leak eventually and he'll be released on the spot. I think the chances he ever appears in a game for the Chiefs again are pretty low.

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14227515)

I'm guessing the league pops him for 2/4 games for "conduct detrimental to the league", he serves it and everyone goes on their way.

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 14227483)

They probably just can't charge him because his wife won't testify and they don't have a case without her.

Some info (such as photos) will probably leak eventually and he'll be released on the spot. I think the chances he ever appears in a game for the Chiefs again are pretty low.

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 14227491)

cringe.

Well...

I had trepidation about Hill when we drafted him. I didn't like it; but I've lived enough life to have seen good people do ****ed up things and was open to a second chance. Unfortunately, I've also seen abusive behavior become a pattern.

Hunt is not the same; nothing he did is anywhere near as bad as either of Hill's alleged offenses. I think Hunt has a drinking/temper problem, and needs to get help. But after lying to the team about the incident(s) and getting caught on film, yeah, the team did the right thing. It's the only thing you CAN do, and have any authority as an organization over everyone that works at 1 Arrowhead Drive.

Clark's offenses in college, when you look into them, are not nearly the same as either although it would be closer in scope to Hunt's transgressions. Some girl said he hit her, then said he didn't, and maybe he probably did, but at any rate it obviously wasn't a BEATING or it would've obvious. AND the felony home invasion thing was that he apparently stole another kid's laptop out of his dorm room. So, yeah, not good, but not punching your pregnant girlfriend and then perhaps breaking that child's arm at three years old bad. And for his NFL career, he's stayed out of trouble.

I can't root for a guy who is a serial abuser of women and children. It ruins everything. IF The Chiefs think he did this, you have to cut him.

So where's YOUR line?

Originally Posted by carlos3652 (Post 14227525)

“Tyreek has maintained from the inception and throughout the investigation that he was innocent of any crime. Contrary to some media reports, Tyreek cooperated with law enforcement, waived his 5th Amend rights, and answered Qs from both police and DCF”

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 14227512)

Exactly, I would get a divorce and hold her history of abuse against her. She wouldn’t be able to file child support because I would have that little secret.

When shit hits the fan you come together to try to figure it out, that’s what happened here. They’re both covering for each other, I must be a piece of shit too because I couldn’t flat out call the cops on her over a broken arm.

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14227513)

CPS isn't likely to get any more "evidence" unless something else happens. Most likely they have just set up a regular visitation schedule to check on the kid until they find there is no reason to continue to do so or something else happens.

Originally Posted by stumppy (Post 14227533)

Nothing like leveraging the abuse of a child into a financial gain for yourself.

Originally Posted by carlos3652 (Post 14227525)

“Tyreek has maintained from the inception and throughout the investigation that he was innocent of any crime. Contrary to some media reports, Tyreek cooperated with law enforcement, waived his 5th Amend rights, and answered Qs from both police and DCF”

Based on Press Release from Reek.

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14227432)

Did the kid trip and fall into a belt rack as well?