ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Major Update on Tyreek Hill [old thread, don't freak out] (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=322529)

keg in kc 04-25-2019 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlos3652 (Post 14227525)
“Tyreek has maintained from the inception and throughout the investigation that he was innocent of any crime. Contrary to some media reports, Tyreek cooperated with law enforcement, waived his 5th Amend rights, and answered Qs from both police and DCF”

Based on Press Release from Reek.

I was wondering about the 5th amendment thing yesterday when I saw it mentioned seemingly out of the blue in Florio's (I think?) tweet. I don't remember hearing or reading that anywhere else.

O.city 04-25-2019 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 14227539)
So now idiots like Florio can STFU about this 5th amendment bullshit.

We really have no clue what is going on here. We have ideas of what could be, but we nothing concrete. And I’m not sure we ever will.

That wasn't actually his statement. That was something made up.

keg in kc 04-25-2019 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 14227545)
Where was mention of a belt? I didn't hear anything about that.

Genuinely curious.

Duncan posted some heresay earlier that it wasn't just a broken arm.

Marcellus 04-25-2019 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14227549)
That wasn't actually his statement. That was something made up.

No that's directly from his statement.

stumppy 04-25-2019 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 14227537)
That’s what she gets for ****ing up, not my problem.

Right! Leave your child with someone who abused them and use that information to not financially support your child.

carlos3652 04-25-2019 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 14227542)
Link?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Also in the Hill release:<br><br>“Tyreek has maintained from the inception and throughout the investigation that he was innocent of any crime. Contrary to some media reports, Tyreek cooperated with law enforcement, waived his 5th Amend rights, and answered Qs from both police and DCF” <a href="https://t.co/j2giReGBWs">pic.twitter.com/j2giReGBWs</a></p>&mdash; Brooke Pryor (@bepryor) <a href="https://twitter.com/bepryor/status/1121426381995425793?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

srvy 04-25-2019 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 14227542)
Link?

They showed on local news this morning that release from Tyreek most likely his lawyers.

O.city 04-25-2019 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14227553)
No that's directly from his statement.

Ah shit, my bad. I didn't see that part.

srvy 04-25-2019 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 14227552)
Duncan posted some heresay earlier that it wasn't just a broken arm.

Whipped thats what Duncan reported. A whip would break flesh especially on a 3 yo child.

RunKC 04-25-2019 09:05 AM

Still think we should use one of those 2nd rd picks on a receiver. There’s just too many questions with this receiving core.

Can Sammy stay healthy?
Will Sammy even be here next year?
Do we want to extend Tyreek at this point?

Robinson is a FA after this season too.

Big need IMO

Eleazar 04-25-2019 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 14227552)
Duncan posted some heresay earlier that it wasn't just a broken arm.

It's heresay at this point, but from people who have good sources and the information completely fits the facts that are known, that the child sustained some severe injuries apart from the broken arm that could not be interpreted as any well-meaning attempt at discipline.

TwistedChief 04-25-2019 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14227543)
Not just this situation, but in general, I think it's kind of ****ed up that we hold the NFL to a higher standard than the legal system.

Maybe, moreso that the NFL gets into the disciplinary stuff above the law. It's such a slippery slope for them.

Like the Zeke thing.

I think you have this backward, buddy.

To take away someone's freedom should demand the highest standard of proof.

To take away someone's job should necessitate a somewhat lower burden.

It's why the burden of proof in a criminal case is much more severe than a civil one.

digger 04-25-2019 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 14227512)
Exactly, I would get a divorce and hold her history of abuse against her. She wouldn’t be able to file child support because I would have that little secret.

When shit hits the fan you come together to try to figure it out, that’s what happened here. They’re both covering for each other, I must be a piece of shit too because I couldn’t flat out call the cops on her over a broken arm.

They are not married.

TEX 04-25-2019 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlos3652 (Post 14227556)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Also in the Hill release:<br><br>“Tyreek has maintained from the inception and throughout the investigation that he was innocent of any crime. Contrary to some media reports, Tyreek cooperated with law enforcement, waived his 5th Amend rights, and answered Qs from both police and DCF” <a href="https://t.co/j2giReGBWs">pic.twitter.com/j2giReGBWs</a></p>&mdash; Brooke Pryor (@bepryor) <a href="https://twitter.com/bepryor/status/1121426381995425793?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



Better delete this. It's not gonna sit well with the lynch mob crowd here. :eek:

O.city 04-25-2019 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 14227583)
I think you have this backward, buddy.

To take away someone's freedom should demand the highest standard of proof.

To take away someone's job should necessitate a somewhat lower burden.

It's why the burden of proof in a criminal case is much more severe than a civil one.

That's definitely true. I agree.

I guess I mean more that I don't know why the NFL wades into these waters the way they do.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.