![]() |
Quote:
Total bullshit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mecole Hardman’s IG pic hits the off-season home. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> <a href="https://t.co/Oh6qcjxhaL">pic.twitter.com/Oh6qcjxhaL</a></p>— Harold R. Kuntz (@HaroldRKuntz3) <a href="https://twitter.com/HaroldRKuntz3/status/1506818704713076740?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
I like Veach, but I felt like he might have taking his time on this one. Teams always overpay in FA. We should have set the market, not the Raiders. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Wmc8bQoL-J0" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
The frustrating part of this for me is the narrative was pay him or trade him and that’s not true. He had one year left on his contract. The third option was make him play out his contract and call his bluff on holding out. So, how far does the threat of a hold out go now? If you have two or three years left and threaten to hold out, can you make the threat and get traded? Chiefs have set a bad precedent here. I’m hoping they have a plan that we will come to fruition and we can say wow! Now it makes sense. Otherwise, this is a terrible move. The goal of a contract is for the player to out play the contract or create contract equity. If a player can threaten a hold out every time he’s “underpayed” what’s the point? The team never gets money back for players like Clark that underperform. We might as well sign everyone to one year deals.
|
Quote:
|
I’m not saying we sign everyone to one year deals. I’m just pointing out that players should play out their contracts. Or what’s the point? If they threaten to hold out, call their bluff and make them play or sit and not get paid, especially if they have one year left on the contract. Again, I’m hoping that there is a plan in place and we will say that’s why they traded hill, the trade makes sense now. But right now, I don’t see it.
|
I for one like the deal and I like it alot.
I think Tyreek's best days are behind him, I don't think he finishes 17 games for the rest of his career, he is going to miss 3-10 games a year going forward, he is wired too tight and is getting older. My money is on 500-950 yards per season for the rest of his career and that it. I think the HUGE haul we got in picks will get at least 2, but with our drafting in midrounds lately probably 3 of the 5 picks will hit and I bet 1 or 2 end up being pro bowlers. We will have a much better team, Ty was great but his best years are defiantly behind him. I'll miss that speed but we have others and will be just fine. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
His production in Miami will go way down, but his Bank Account will swell. I hope he gets good financial advise.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.