ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Federer (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=157300)

bogie 01-25-2007 11:23 AM

Federer
 
Gotta give Federer props. He's dominating tennis. Same props go to Tiger who has been, and hopefully continues dominating golf. Today begins the 2007 PGA season, right? Horray, something to watch on Sundays. Who in sports has risen to a level equal to these guys? Jordan, in basketball. Maybe Beckham in soccer. Sorenstam in womens golf? Who else?

Go Tiger. He aint the Chiefs, but he's really, really good.

to quote Fax:
"Sorry if repost"

Silock 01-25-2007 11:36 AM

Definitely not Beckham. Pele, for sure. Beckham is like the Steve Nash of soccer. Really, really good at what he does, but doesn't always have the ability to take the game over.

I don't think anyone, recently, besides Tiger, Sorenstam and Jordan have completely dominated their sport like Federer is doing now.

MahiMike 01-25-2007 11:41 AM

I hate the Tiger tour. Golf was more fun to watch when a different guy won every week. Now even when he's out of it, they still show every shot he makes.

It's boring now.

Valiant 01-25-2007 11:43 AM

I wouldn't say Beckham had the same influence on soccer as Jordan or Federer, and 99% of the world does not care about women sports...

Redrum_69 01-25-2007 11:44 AM

Rick Clunn > *

HolmeZz 01-25-2007 11:45 AM

Beckham isn't even equatable to Nash. In reality he's a glorified free-kick artist. If he didn't look like he does, he'd be unknown to about the 95% of people who know him now.

Federer, on the other hand, is absolutely dominant.

vailpass 01-25-2007 11:48 AM

What are these "tennis" and "soccer" things of which you speak?

Silock 01-25-2007 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolmeZz
Beckham isn't even equatable to Nash. In reality he's a glorified free-kick artist. If he didn't look like he does, he'd be unknown to about the 95% of people who know him now.

Federer, on the other hand, is absolutely dominant.

Maybe, but his free kicks have won the teams he plays for several games. Hard to argue with that. He's a very good player, just not one of the elites.

bogie 01-25-2007 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock
Definitely not Beckham. Pele, for sure. Beckham is like the Steve Nash of soccer. Really, really good at what he does, but doesn't always have the ability to take the game over.

I don't think anyone, recently, besides Tiger, Sorenstam and Jordan have completely dominated their sport like Federer is doing now.

Agree on Pele.

Pants 01-25-2007 03:18 PM

Zidane > Beckham in every aspect of the game.

Silock 01-25-2007 03:21 PM

Especially use of the head.

teedubya 01-25-2007 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike
Zidane > Beckham in every aspect of the game.


i remember you... didnt you use to be Metrolike?

KurtCobain 01-25-2007 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valiant
I wouldn't say Beckham had the same influence on soccer as Jordan or Federer, and 99% of the world does not care about women sports...

I sure don't!

kstater 01-25-2007 07:20 PM

I think Federer is probably the most underappreciated athete of our time. He gets an occasional story on Sportscenter but pretty much nothing else. He has dominated tennis more than anyone else has dominated a sport, including Tiger.

Reaper16 01-25-2007 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater
I think Federer is probably the most underappreciated athete of our time. He gets an occasional story on Sportscenter but pretty much nothing else. He has dominated tennis more than anyone else has dominated a sport, including Tiger.

It's because he's humble and isn't an overblown personality.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.