Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8277041)

ROFL ROFL:

http://www.google.com/url?source=img...NUMnJJ2csfQ8qg


See you in 2013. htismaqe, you can have my Mock selections.

Good night, and Good luck.

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9263967)

It's long overdue. I can't wait to get his take on what's transpired. I'm sure he's thrilled we've completely pulled out of AfCasselstan.

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9263765)

Curious who his QB/Head Coach combo would be.

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 9263998)

I wasn't around at the time...why did he go into exile in the first place?

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 9263998)

I wasn't around at the time...why did he go into exile in the first place?

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 9264001)

I have to assume Alex Smith/Kirk Ferentz.

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 9263998)

I wasn't around at the time...why did he go into exile in the first place?

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9264014)

He said he'd leave for a year if Tebow won a playoff game.

Originally Posted by crossbow (Post 9263993)

Where has he been all this time?

Also, should we organize a parade?

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8275156)

If Denver wins today and it occurs without

A) Roethlisberger getting hurt

or

B) Denver forcing three or more TOs, I won't post for a year.

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 9264023)

This rocket scientist, without any prodding just out of the blue, posted the following:



Why do people do that? Board ban bets are stupid enough, but whenever I see "if X happens, I wont post for Y", I just roll my eyes and think, "moron".

If you need to take a break from the board, have the self-discipline to F'ing post less.

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 9264051)

It won't be exciting unless an equally powerful supervillain arises on the board at the same time.

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 9264051)

It won't be exciting unless an equally powerful supervillain arises on the board at the same time.

Originally Posted by Capt Tasty Cheeks (Post 9264035)

one time I said "if Priest Holmes has 20 or more carries this year I'll never post again" trying to make a point that he was just trying to get one more payday...

well he ended up getting like 35 carries before he reinjured himself and then I became known as a huge welcher

I learned my lesson to not post the "I bet you a million dollar" bets.

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 9264051)

It won't be exciting unless an equally powerful supervillain arises on the board at the same time.

Originally Posted by Capt Tasty Cheeks (Post 9264063)

I'd say it's about time for a Clayton Wendler heel turn anyways.

Originally Posted by Capt Tasty Cheeks (Post 9264075)

For instance, I still think Tony Romo is awesome.

Originally Posted by Capt Tasty Cheeks (Post 9264063)

I'd say it's about time for a Clayton Wendler heel turn anyways.

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9264089)

Heh, you're fishing here.

I'll go as far as saying Romo is good, even very good at times. But awesome? Not really. He just can't get it done in the biggest moments. Look no further than that last pick he threw against the Skins. You simply do NOT make that throw. "Awesome" QB's throw it away on that play.

All that being said, I'd take him now on the Chiefs, in a heartbeat.

Originally Posted by Capt Tasty Cheeks (Post 9264098)

in order to be a successful villain you have to be able to find a DaneMcCloud or Hamas Jenkins weakness and be able to press into it and not let up regardless of how clever their rebuttal posts are

Hamas was VERY good at coming up with 'dig deep' insults. A good villain never lets his shield down. He keeps pressing regardless of how many LMAO direct quotes a Hamas Jenkins will get.

and you also have to drag them through their one big mistake at a constant rate...Hamas kryptonite was Vernon Gholston.

We saw Clay all over Dane this year with the "the Chiefs are so good they'll win 12 games despite Matt Cassel" post. Dane is a great babyface. He does not like when people go against him. He was not happy with Clay throwing that in his face this year. Clay understands how to play the villain.

WHICH IS WHY WE NEED A CLAY HEEL TURN

Clay. I want a corporate heel turn. From now on, Pioli is your guy. Go!

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 9264093)

Hey you changed the avatar. Now every time you post ill think to myself...effin eh, cotton.

Originally Posted by Capt Tasty Cheeks (Post 9264098)

in order to be a successful villain you have to be able to find a DaneMcCloud or Hamas Jenkins weakness and be able to press into it and not let up regardless of how clever their rebuttal posts are

Hamas was VERY good at coming up with 'dig deep' insults. A good villain never lets his shield down. He keeps pressing regardless of how many LMAO direct quotes a Hamas Jenkins will get.

and you also have to drag them through their one big mistake at a constant rate...Hamas kryptonite was Vernon Gholston.

We saw Clay all over Dane this year with the "the Chiefs are so good they'll win 12 games despite Matt Cassel" post. Dane is a great babyface. He does not like when people go against him. He was not happy with Clay throwing that in his face this year. Clay understands how to play the villain.

WHICH IS WHY WE NEED A CLAY HEEL TURN

Clay. I want a corporate heel turn. From now on, Pioli is your guy. Go!

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9264151)

LMAO

I was warring with drafturbators over Haley and Pioli in 2009.

I'm sure these things will work themselves out naturally.

I'm already building up rage towards OnTheTardPath58 for his pre-emptive strikes against Clark Hunt's new HC hiring philosophy.

CLARK HUNT IS MY SWEET BABOO

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9264137)

Blackbob vs. Hamas

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9264137)

Blackbob vs. Hamas

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9264162)

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9264157)

Save the rage, tell me where you think I'm off base.

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9264173)

I just don't have a problem with it. You can win a SB that way.

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9263770)

My only concern is that he's painting himself into a corner.

By not firing Pioli outright, he creates three possible problems:


1.) Clark is forced to limit his HC search to guys who are capable of having control of personnel decisions.

This is a pretty small list to begin with, and you're already hearing rumblings from guys like Gruden, Cowher and Billick that they aren't interested in coming back. That pretty much leaves Andy Reid and Chip Kelly, who other teams are already fighting over, while we're wasting time with Dirk Koetter and a Rooney Rule candidate.


2.) Hiring a HC and not finding a quality GM.

For sake of conversation, lets say Clark hires Dirk Koetter. Who is the new GM? Guys like Ross, Gamble and Dorsey will either be long gone, or aren't going to be interested in a position in which they have no control over who the HC is. GM's expect to be able to hire a HC.


3.) **** me, but when Reid goes to Arizona or San Diego, and Kelly goes to Cleveland, and there's nothing left that satisfies the first option, and option two comes to fruition and Clark can't find a GM - what happens then?

We all know what happens then.



I know everyone is excited about Clark stepping out on a limb, and I am as well - but he could have stepped out on a thicker limb. I'm not seeing how throwing all your eggs in a Bill Cowher type basket is what is best for the organization.

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9264137)

Blackbob vs. Hamas

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9264226)

Clark is setting his sights high on a top notch HC. I'm not gonna fault him for that. If he doesn't get it done, he doesn't get it done, and he deserves to be criticized.

Just gonna wait and see like I always do. The guy got the top GM candidate 4 years ago, I think he'll get his guy again.

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9264231)

So in other words, you can't argue a single point I made, but hope that Clark knows what he's doing.

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9264244)

I admit you have legit concerns.

If Clark fails at getting one one of his top HC targets, you're absolutely right.

I'm just not gonna cry about it until he does.

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9264231)

So in other words, you can't argue a single point I made, but hope that Clark knows what he's doing.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9264263)

Want else CAN we do?

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

I'm already building up rage towards OnTheTardPath58 for his pre-emptive strikes against Clark Hunt's new HC hiring philosophy.

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9264273)

Well, I'm trying to have a discussion about it.

He's the one that implied I was way off base with the above "rage" quote, yet when pressed, can't argue any of my points.

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 9264023)

This rocket scientist, without any prodding just out of the blue, posted the following:



Why do people do that? Board ban bets are stupid enough, but whenever I see "if X happens, I wont post for Y", I just roll my eyes and think, "moron".

If you need to take a break from the board, have the self-discipline to F'ing post less.

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 9264300)

Not posting on here is a gift you can give to yourself.

Check it out: If the snow outside this house doesn't melt in the next five minutes, I won't post on here for TWENTY YEARS

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9264273)

Well, I'm trying to have a discussion about it.

He's the one that implied I was way off base with the above "rage" quote, yet when pressed, can't argue any of my points.

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9264288)

They're legit points. But it's kind of like saying "oh no, it risky" in the same way drafting a franchise QB is.

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 9264300)

Not posting on here is a gift you can give to yourself.

Check it out: If the snow outside this house doesn't melt in the next five minutes, I won't post on here for TWENTY YEARS

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 9264300)

Not posting on here is a gift you can give to yourself.

Check it out: If the snow outside this house doesn't melt in the next five minutes, I won't post on here for TWENTY YEARS

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9264323)

*imagining Ultra Peanut furiously melting snow with hair dryer this very second*

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9264312)

You sound like a fan that has been absolutely beat down, and is pretty unhappy with the direction this team *may* be headed.

I'm in no way saying you're wrong to feel this way. It's just a sad sign of what this team has become when its long time knowledgable fans reach this point.

Your concerns are legit. The sad part is that these concerns were the first thing to spring to your mind when Pioli wasn't immediately shown the door. Why? Becasue we've all come to expect the Cheifs to not do the right thing. That is the tradgedy of being a Chiefs fan in 2013. We expect the worst to happen. Hell, we have the first pick in the draft, and there isn't a one of us that hasn't had the thought that they are completely going to screw the pooch with the pick. It's frustrating.

On a personal note, 2010 did me in with heavy emotional attachment to the Chiefs. 2010 was a complete and total mirage, and I bought in completely. After the shit years of Herm I almost mailed it in, then Pioli and Haley show up, win a division, and it looked like the Chiefs had hope. But even before the Ravens playoff game, the Raiders absolutely exposed us. I gave up letting myself be tied to this team after that playoff game.

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9264332)

there are really only two or three things that could happen.

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9264338)

Like throwing the football?

RISKY

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9264314)

No, it's not at all.

Drafting a franchise QB is damn near necessary to win a Championship.

Putting all your eggs in Bill Cowher's (or Billick, Gruden, etc) basket and hoping he says yes is far from necessary.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9264353)

What if he's already said yes and they're just checking off the Rooney rule and working on paperwork?

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 9264329)

More like spreading around packing peanuts to cover any gaps the snow isn't covering.

... wait ****. I guess I'll keep posting but that doesn't mean I have to like it!

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9264419)

Will he come back as Matrix? Maybe he'll return as heel.

Originally Posted by Capt Tasty Cheeks (Post 9264063)

I'd say it's about time for a Clayton Wendler heel turn anyways.

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 9263998)

I wasn't around at the time...why did he go into exile in the first place?

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 9264842)

Massive ego, small penis.

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 9264795)

C'mon you philistines, everyone should recognize that he's always been a tweener. Sometimes he fights the faces, sometimes he fights the heels.

Hamas, on the other hand, is the classic cool heel and I'm buying his shirt the minute he re-debuts (probably in a run-in to punt a true fan's head).

4 4 4 4 LYFE

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 9264842)

Massive ego, small penis.

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 9264967)

You've just described most of CP membership