![]() |
Was anything posted about Soria leaving the Royals?
http://kansascity.royals.mlb.com/new...ook_kc&c_id=kc
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Whew those couple years he was awesome.
|
He's been gone for a while.
|
Has any athlete ever destroyed their own mojo as thoroughly as Soria did by decrying his own awesome, fan-loved nickname?
|
Should have traded him when his value was high.
|
Quote:
I think the bigger indictment of the Royals is the crazy number of TJ surgeries their pitchers in general are having to undergo. Something is very broken there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If he had a sick curveball, and was from SW Missouri, it would probably be distasteful to call him the "Joplinado." |
Viva La Soria
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Closers are the most over-valued position in baseball. Find a good one, then find a team dumb enough to trade a ton for him.
Good mid-relievers come in during much tighter situations and are much more valuable for winning close games. |
Quote:
|
Yes... to the thread title question. Maybe not as thread but in the Royals repository thread.
|
Quote:
|
It's easy for people to say we should have traded him while his value was high but people forget that until the last year or two our bullpen was absolute crap. How many leads/wins did they blow? Way too damn many. So on those occasions when we had a late lead we had Soria at least to close it out (when he was good). Trading him would have been a sure sign that the team had given up/didn't care... the same things so many teeth gnashing Royals fans have lamented over and over.
Yeah he went south... had problems staying healthy. Shit happens. There was a time not that long ago when he was about the only reliable pitcher we had, especially out of the pen. So sue the Royals for keeping him and trying to win those games. A trade at his peak would have gone over like a turd in the punchbowl. Bulletin boards would have exploded. Oh the horror. It's easy to look back now with 20/20 vision. |
NOSOTROS CREMOS!!!
|
Quote:
Would the team have lost a few more games? Potentially. But when you're losing damn near 100 anyway, who gives a ****. If a high-quality reliever can generate a potentially high-quality position player or starter, you make that trade every single day when you're a shit club. |
Quote:
|
he wanted to leave clear back after Greinke did
|
Quote:
And the second bold has never been stated before. |
Quote:
As for the rest I'm not interested in arguing with you. We disagree on several things. So be it. |
Quote:
Meaningless wins. He could have been traded for somethingthat could contribute when were are pushing for the playoffs. Or the player could have sucked. If he had he would have contributed just as much as soria the past couple years Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But continue with the yadda yadda yawn Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
No matter the topic these places (CP and the like) always know best but the people who have the most to say spend a lot of time posting their genius rather than applying for jobs with the club they know so much more about. |
Quote:
The royals choose to keep him and win a few extra games when they were losing almost a hundred every year and out of it by June. Who was right? Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
Eric Hosmer had a bad year. Mike Moustakas had a meh second half. I don't see people wanting to cut loose of them right now. Give each of them another slow start and the wolves will be knocking though. Then extend that slow start into a full year and the Royals will (have been) stupid not to trade them when their value was the highest... and the circle jerk goes on. |
Quote:
Who said to trade those guys last year? Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The six examples were in no way the same as the Soria situation. He was a good player that could have potentially been swapped for a great young prospect. Or more. He also had injury concerns. Some wanted to make the trade because of this and the fact the Youngs were father away at that point No other of the first four could someone say that about. All had not done well prior. No wonder some didn't want them. Your last two "future examples" were made up. Can't see how you would think that would help your argument at this point Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
The point was fans here or anywhere aren't always right even if they think they are... which they very often do. Fans don't know the ins and outs of what goes on. They don't know actual team goals or philosophys. It's fun to put ourselves in the GM's shoes but none of us are capable... and I don't care what anyone here thinks of that. We aren't. |
Yawn.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
WOOT! :D |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.