ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Broncos open as 2.5 favorites and now (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=278935)

Nzoner 11-25-2013 09:18 AM

Broncos open as 2.5 favorites and now
 
-3 with an over/under of 47.5

UPDATED Wed Nov 27th 12:30 p.m. KC now -5.5 dog now

Sunday morning Broncos -6.5

Munson 11-25-2013 09:30 AM

Only 2.5 points?

Old Dog 11-25-2013 09:31 AM

Without knowing the status of the puff puff pass rush, and being the pessimist I am, I would put a LARGE wager on Denver.

Prison Bitch 11-25-2013 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Munson (Post 10223359)
Only 2.5 points?

Sagarin has Denver (-2.5) on a neutral. Home field is worth 4.15 points this year. So his system says Denver +1.5.

Dayze 11-25-2013 09:36 AM

so does the 'negative' sign in the odds/lines indicate the favorite?
Meaning, you could be on Denver if you thought that they'd score 3.5pts more than the chiefs?

Shox 11-25-2013 09:38 AM

Denver got beat up Sunday as well. They had like 3 injuries.

Old Dog 11-25-2013 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shox (Post 10223385)
Denver got beat up Sunday as well. They had like 3 injuries.

Irrelevant....none were to Manning

Marcellus 11-25-2013 09:45 AM

I am surprised its not higher.

notorious 11-25-2013 09:54 AM

Overtime game.

On the road.

Late.

Beat up.

If our defense wasn't a pile of shit right now, we should beat the hell out of Denver.

Nzoner 11-25-2013 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 10223377)
so does the 'negative' sign in the odds/lines indicate the favorite?
Meaning, you could be on Denver if you thought that they'd score 3.5pts more than the chiefs?

correct

Ace Gunner 11-25-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10223404)
I am surprised its not higher.

me too

Dayze 11-25-2013 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10223435)
correct

Gracias.

Ace Gunner 11-25-2013 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 10223433)
Overtime game.

On the road.

Late.

Beat up.

If our defense wasn't a pile of shit right now, we should beat the hell out of Denver.


really? how'd that go 9 days ago idiot

notorious 11-25-2013 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace Gunner (Post 10223446)
really? how'd that go 9 days ago idiot

?


Basic NFL dipshit. Look up the record of teams after an OT game when you get done fisting your brother.

Ace Gunner 11-25-2013 10:01 AM

beyond the obvious injuries, the OL & WR's were the difference yesterday compared with the denver game.

hope the ****ing experts noted the obvious point, they love obvious for some reason

mr. tegu 11-25-2013 10:23 AM

Not really a good game to bet at this point without knowing the injury status of each team. Chiefs on the money line is probably the best bet just because of the potential return.

Dayze 11-25-2013 10:26 AM

A guy I used to work with had his hobby as betting on football. Meaning, he would allocate $700-1000k / yr for betting; no more. he was always successful, would at a minimum break even. took his wife to Hawaii a few years back with his winnings, and ended up hanging out with John Reep and his wife each night at the pool until about 2am lol. that shit would be fun.

he's pretty selective in his games though; and primarily best on NCAA. he tried to explain all the betting terminology once....I retained it for a day, then lost it lol

Shox 11-25-2013 10:35 AM

The over seems like a give me. Manning is good for 25 minimum and probably 35 and the Donkie D is suspect. The way our O has been playing of late they won't hold us under 21 and probably will push 30.

Nzoner 11-25-2013 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 10223502)
A guy I used to work with had his hobby as betting on football. Meaning, he would allocate $700-1000k / yr for betting; no more. he was always successful, would at a minimum break even. took his wife to Hawaii a few years back with his winnings, and ended up hanging out with John Reep and his wife each night at the pool until about 2am lol. that shit would be fun.

he's pretty selective in his games though; and primarily best on NCAA. he tried to explain all the betting terminology once....I retained it for a day, then lost it lol

I absolutely love being in Vegas during NFL season or NCAA March Madness,there is nothing like being in a great sportsbook with all the games on and a cold drink and betting tickets in front of you.

Dayze 11-25-2013 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10223525)
I absolutely love being in Vegas during NFL season or NCAA March Madness,there is nothing like being in a great sportsbook with all the games on and a cold drink and betting tickets in front of you.

I think he must have a connection or something; he lives here in OP but still bets. I'm assuming one would need to have a hook-up in Vegas?

sfuria 11-25-2013 11:32 AM

This is where I go:

http://sports.bovada.lv/

whoman69 11-25-2013 11:41 AM

I wouldn't touch this game unless I knew what the status of Hali and Houston are. If we are without both, Chiefs should be figured to fall hard.

Poop Shovel 11-25-2013 11:41 AM

I wouldn't worry too much, fellas. Alex Smith has shown that he can put this team on his back and march to the end zone. Victory is assured!

lewdog 11-25-2013 04:08 PM

I just took that bet with Denver -3.5. Easy money.

Nzoner 11-25-2013 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 10223601)
I think he must have a connection or something; he lives here in OP but still bets. I'm assuming one would need to have a hook-up in Vegas?

I know nothing.

BossChief 11-25-2013 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 10224534)
I just took that bet with Denver -3.5. Easy money.

It's NEVER easy.

Just know this:

Our DBs know they got embarrassed last week and will be looking to step their games up and if they don't, people will all them overrated. They honestly feel they are the best secondary in the league and will be on a mission to prove as much.

I think if either Hali or Houston play, we have a good chance at a win.

Dayze 11-25-2013 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10224561)
I know nothing.

this always reminds me of bootcamp; there was a pudgy kid named Shultz and our DI always had him yell out "I KNOW NOTHING" is a loud German accent any time they called his name. Anywhere, at any time. Gold Jerry. Gold.
http://madashelland.com/wp-content/u...01/Schultz.jpg

lewdog 11-25-2013 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10224604)
It's NEVER easy.

Just know this:

Our DBs know they got embarrassed last week and will be looking to step their games up and if they don't, people will all them overrated. They honestly feel they are the best secondary in the league and will be on a mission to prove as much.

I think if either Hali or Houston play, we have a good chance at a win.

I'll argue that our DBs are two of the slowest DBs and were only masked the weeks previous by an outstanding pass rush. Flowers might be the biggest disappointment on this entire team considering his previous years of outstanding play and his drop this year.

Denver's Oline owned our Dline when everyone of the Chiefs was healthy. Our Dline being healthy for this game is obviously in question.

We saw crossing routes against the Donks and defended them WORSE against the Bolts a week later.

I don't see any of this getting better against the Donks.

keg in kc 11-25-2013 06:14 PM

Holy shit. That's way lower than I expected.

jspchief 11-25-2013 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 10223601)
I think he must have a connection or something; he lives here in OP but still bets. I'm assuming one would need to have a hook-up in Vegas?

There's a bookie in every town.

SAUTO 11-25-2013 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shox (Post 10223520)
The over seems like a give me. Manning is good for 25 minimum and probably 35 and the Donkie D is suspect. The way our O has been playing of late they won't hold us under 21 and probably will push 30.

go you mean our offense yesterday?

Because we just played Denver last week (which would be "of late"too) and only scored 17.
Posted via Mobile Device

ILChief 11-25-2013 07:08 PM

I see chump bailey is gonna play this week. We need to target his old ass early and often. Dude is finished

Chiefs Pantalones 11-25-2013 07:17 PM

I hope someone can convince me otherwise (and I'm typically a pretty optimistic person) but for the first time this year I don't think we have even the slightest chance on God's green earth to win this game.

Simply Red 11-25-2013 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 10224889)
Holy shit. That's way lower than I expected.

mhm

Simply Red 11-25-2013 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 10224996)
I hope someone can convince me otherwise (and I'm typically a pretty optimistic person) but for the first time this year I don't think we have even the slightest chance on God's green earth to win this game.

yup.

Simply Red 11-25-2013 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 10224988)
I see chump bailey is gonna play this week. We need to target his old ass early and often. Dude is finished

with who though? :shrug: ROFL

Direckshun 11-25-2013 07:27 PM

How many times has Manning lost back to back games in the past 10 years?

Discuss Thrower 11-25-2013 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10225017)
How many times has Manning lost back to back games in the past 10 years?

Games 2-3 2012
Games 10-12 2010
Games 15-16 2009
Games 7-8 2008
Games 8-9 2007
Games 12-13 2006
Games 14-15 2005
Games 6-7 2004 (Game 7 @ KC)
Games 6-8 in 2002

Psyko Tek 11-25-2013 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 10224996)
I hope someone can convince me otherwise (and I'm typically a pretty optimistic person) but for the first time this year I don't think we have even the slightest chance on God's green earth to win this game.

had a back and forth with an old denver friend even after they beat us in denver he still expected a split
and then last night I got an email

put a tomahawk in them they are done

I can't argue with that


then much later after the denver pats game

I responded
is there anything denver can't choke on?

Marcellus 11-25-2013 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 10225021)
Games 2-3 2012
Games 10-12 2010
Games 15-16 2009
Games 7-8 2008
Games 8-9 2007
Games 12-13 2006
Games 14-15 2005
Games 6-7 2004 (Game 7 @ KC)
Games 6-8 in 2002

A simple 9x would have sufficed.

AussieChiefsFan 11-25-2013 08:41 PM

So that's pretty much the home-field advantage right? At Denver it was about -6, and if home-field is worth about 3...

AussieChiefsFan 11-25-2013 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 10225021)
Games 2-3 2012
Games 10-12 2010
Games 15-16 2009
Games 7-8 2008
Games 8-9 2007
Games 12-13 2006
Games 14-15 2005
Games 6-7 2004 (Game 7 @ KC)
Games 6-8 in 2002

Looks like he's never lost back-to-back games twice in a single season, too.

Chiefs Pantalones 11-25-2013 08:54 PM

I think we're ****ed. 5 seed is ours though.

AussieChiefsFan 11-25-2013 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 10225339)
I think we're ****ed. 5 seed is ours though.

Well that's a given. Next best team has like 4 wins.

Discuss Thrower 11-25-2013 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10225279)
A simple 9x would have sufficed.

Felt necessary to head off any concerns that these back to back losses came mostly at the end of seasons with the Colts / Broncos resting starters.

Dayze 11-25-2013 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10225279)
A simple 9x would have sufficed.

Discuss doesn't **** around.

Strongside 11-25-2013 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 10224996)
I hope someone can convince me otherwise (and I'm typically a pretty optimistic person) but for the first time this year I don't think we have even the slightest chance on God's green earth to win this game.

Really? Man, I'm pretty optimistic after the complete shit that Denver took last night and how our offense looked. Sure, we'll need to be much better on defense, but when all things shake out...we're at Arrowhead. There won't be an empty seat in the house, it's December and it will be LOUD. If one of our pass rushers is able to go, I think we can win for sure.

Chiefs Pantalones 11-25-2013 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10225554)
Really? Man, I'm pretty optimistic after the complete shit that Denver took last night and how our offense looked. Sure, we'll need to be much better on defense, but when all things shake out...we're at Arrowhead. There won't be an empty seat in the house, it's December and it will be LOUD. If one of our pass rushers is able to go, I think we can win for sure.

It's probably just the taste from the last two weeks but I just don't see us winning. It seems as if offenses know how to attack our D even with the duo in.

TripleThreat 11-25-2013 10:19 PM

I can't bet on games like this. You just never know what could happen

mr. tegu 11-25-2013 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 10225599)
It's probably just the taste from the last two weeks but I just don't see us winning. It seems as if offenses know how to attack our D even with the duo in.

San Diego did nothing until both Houston and Hali were out. We obviously had no reason to plan on playing defense without those guys and the Chargers took advantage of it in what was in reality a desperation game for them.

With a week to actually prepare I think we can adjust. In fact one good thing is that a lack of confidence in a four man rush should lead to more blitzes. Combine that with playing the WRs tight and physical like NE did u think the defense can do enough to win the game.

Also, the offense has a good chance to repeat what they just did against a banged up defense we saw glimpses of it against the Donks the first time but we were just a little off which is understandable given that we hadn't been throwing much down field. Against the Chargers Smith did a better job of staying in the pocket and not giving up on plays with check downs or taking sacks. That is why he had success with deep passes and why we finally had receivers running completely wide open.

Al Czervik 11-25-2013 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 10225739)
San Diego did nothing until both Houston and Hali were out. We obviously had no reason to plan on playing defense without those guys and the Chargers took advantage of it in what was in reality a desperation game for them.

With a week to actually prepare I think we can adjust. In fact one good thing is that a lack of confidence in a four man rush should lead to more blitzes. Combine that with playing the WRs tight and physical like NE did u think the defense can do enough to win the game.

Also, the offense has a good chance to repeat what they just did against a banged up defense we saw glimpses of it against the Donks the first time but we were just a little off which is understandable given that we hadn't been throwing much down field. Against the Chargers Smith did a better job of staying in the pocket and not giving up on plays with check downs or taking sacks. That is why he had success with deep passes and why we finally had receivers running completely wide open.

Sure hope your right....
Just seems like the Defense has been average for the last 5 weeks....Even thou they had two TD's in Buffalo, they really havent dominated like they did in the first 6 weeks....

Dylan 11-26-2013 12:23 AM

http://www.picresize.com/images/tpfm...percentage.png

http://www.denverssportsstation.com/...ianchi&id=1071


* If this information has been posted, please let me know and I will delete the post.

Gravedigger 11-26-2013 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan (Post 10225800)
http://www.picresize.com/images/tpfm...percentage.png

http://www.denverssportsstation.com/...ianchi&id=1071


* If this information has been posted, please let me know and I will delete the post.

If it's 30 degrees or 85 degrees Denver is so screwed.

TEX 11-26-2013 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10223338)

Wow, I'm surprised its that low with all the injuries on defense...

Old Dog 11-26-2013 08:48 AM

I went with the money line instead. $509 on Denver at -203 to win $250.

Dayze 11-26-2013 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 10225980)
I went with the money line instead. $509 on Denver at -203 to win $250.

what does this mean? ...betting NooB here.

Old Dog 11-26-2013 09:08 AM

The money line is -203. You would have to bet $203 on Denver to win $100 (plus you obviously get your $203 back).
FOR the Chiefs the current money line is +175, so if you bet $100 and win you get $275 back (the $100 you bet plus the $175 for winning)

Color Red 11-26-2013 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 10223400)
Irrelevant....none were to Manning

So those guys standing in front of Manning blocking are irrelevant.

Dayze 11-26-2013 09:11 AM

Chiefs will
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/7809...big-time-o.gif GIFSoup

Old Dog 11-26-2013 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Color Red (Post 10226006)
So those guys standing in front of Manning blocking are irrelevant.

When he gets the ball out in less than 2 seconds??? Pretty much.

Strongside 11-26-2013 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 10225980)
I went with the money line instead. $509 on Denver at -203 to win $250.

Condolences.

Old Dog 11-26-2013 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10226024)
Condolences.

I hope to lose every time I bet against the Chiefs. I figure if I lose the bet, I'm happy they won. If I win the money is an ointment for my pain.

I have had a pretty decent run over the last month or so, I'm still playing with their money right now.

Strongside 11-26-2013 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 10226028)
I hope to lose every time I bet against the Chiefs. I figure if I lose the bet, I'm happy they won. If I win the money is an ointment for my pain.

I have had a pretty decent run over the last month or so, I'm still playing with their money right now.

House money makes it hurt less, for sure. If you'd have asked me 2 weeks ago, I'd have taken Denver. After gaining some confidence in our offense, seeing Denver completely collapse Sunday, and now knowing that their best run stuffer is out for 6 weeks...I'm taking the Chiefs.

We're at home, it will be dark/getting cold by halftime, crowd noise is going to be INSANE, Hali should be able to go, we've got fresh tape and will hopefully follow the Pats game plan a bit. If Jamaal has a big game, we win. Period.

I think it will be close, but I think we get it done.

Nzoner 11-26-2013 10:20 AM

-3.5 now,the bettors are laying their money on Denver

Nzoner 11-26-2013 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 10225980)
I went with the money line instead. $509 on Denver at -203 to win $250.

Real money or the CP Gambling game :)

Old Dog 11-26-2013 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10226213)
Real money or the CP Gambling game :)

real...Got a buddy that lives out there that makes all of the plays for me. I send him a couple thousand on 1 June every year and then I play until the money is gone or in a few (very few) instances he's sent me a check back at the end of May. Right now I have right at 3,200 in my "account" after the bet (only made the one) this week.

Nzoner 11-26-2013 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 10226332)
real...Got a buddy that lives out there that makes all of the plays for me. I send him a couple thousand on 1 June every year and then I play until the money is gone or in a few (very few) instances he's sent me a check back at the end of May. Right now I have right at 3,200 in my "account" after the bet (only made the one) this week.

Very cool,I've got active tickets right now on KC and Detroit for the Super Bowl,always do a few futures bets every March.

MileHighFish 11-26-2013 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10226382)
Very cool,I've got active tickets right now on KC and Detroit for the Super Bowl,always do a few futures bets every March.

Nice! What odds did you get on KC and Detroit?

Old Dog 11-26-2013 11:53 AM

Don't know his, but I got KC at 50-1 (only for $10)

Nzoner 11-27-2013 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MileHighFish (Post 10226470)
Nice! What odds did you get on KC and Detroit?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 10226492)
Don't know his, but I got KC at 50-1 (only for $10)

Detroit was 20/1 to win NFC,Chiefs were 18/1 for AFC and 35/1 for Super Bowl

Nzoner 11-27-2013 12:32 PM

I've heard it takes a million dollars to move a Vegas line 1/2 a point and KC is now a -5.5 dog after starting at -2.5,wow.

Pablo 11-27-2013 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10229001)
I've heard it takes a million dollars to move a Vegas line 1/2 a point and KC is now a -5.5 dog after starting at -2.5,wow.

Holy hell.

That's a little bit of money.

notorious 11-27-2013 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nzoner (Post 10226199)
-3.5 now,the bettors are laying their money on Denver

Damn, a sharp better could have themselves shielded against a loss and win double with a 3 point win.

notorious 11-27-2013 02:01 PM

Bodes well.

Bet against the masses, gentlemen.

mr. tegu 11-27-2013 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 10229256)
Damn, a sharp better could have themselves shielded against a loss and win double with a 3 point win.

Using online betting you can do something similar. For example, if you take an under at 50.5 for $100, at half time the score is 10-7, and the second half o/u is 20.5 and you take the over for $100, that is a range of 48-50 where you win both bets.

Also, you cannot lose since one of your bets is guaranteed to hit. I have done quite well with that in the past. It works even better on basketball since those ranges (specifically the one where you win both bets) tend to be larger.

sfuria 11-27-2013 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 10229273)
Using online betting you can do something similar. For example, if you take an under at 50.5 for $100, at half time the score is 10-7, and the second half o/u is 20.5 and you take the over for $100, that is a range of 48-50 where you win both bets.

Also, you cannot lose since one of your bets is guaranteed to hit. I have done quite well with that in the past. It works even better on basketball since those ranges (specifically the one where you win both bets) tend to be larger.

Thanks for the tip! Question, where do u go online? I go to bovada, its ok I guess. I do like their live betting... when it works. Would like to check out other reputable places though, but I'm scared to try a place that hasn't been recommended.

Jakemall 11-27-2013 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 10229273)
Using online betting you can do something similar. For example, if you take an under at 50.5 for $100, at half time the score is 10-7, and the second half o/u is 20.5 and you take the over for $100, that is a range of 48-50 where you win both bets.

Also, you cannot lose since one of your bets is guaranteed to hit. I have done quite well with that in the past. It works even better on basketball since those ranges (specifically the one where you win both bets) tend to be larger.

Maybe I'm being obtuse, but why would you bet the over when the score is 10-7?

Coogs 11-27-2013 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 10229514)
Maybe I'm being obtuse, but why would you bet the over when the score is 10-7?

Over 20.5 for the second half only.

But, I think his range to win both bets (under for entire game and over for second half) would be 38 - 50.

sfuria 11-27-2013 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 10229514)
Maybe I'm being obtuse, but why would you bet the over when the score is 10-7?

Because in his example, the o/u for the 2nd half 20.5. If the score goes over 20.5, he wins the over and long as the score doesn't go over the inital 50.5 he wins both bets. If the score stays under 20.5 he still wins the first bet.

mr. tegu 11-27-2013 04:44 PM

Broncos open as 2.5 favorites and now
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 10229522)
Over 20.5 for the second half only.

But, I think his range to win both bets (under for entire game and over for second half) would be 38 - 50.

Oh yes my bad. You are indeed correct. It didn't sound right but I couldn't figure out why.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.