ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Jeff Flanagan: "Tyler Bray slow to grasp pro system" (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=283620)

FringeNC 05-11-2014 11:50 AM

Jeff Flanagan: "Tyler Bray slow to grasp pro system"
 
http://msn.foxsports.com/kansas-city...-murray-051014

In a puff piece on Aaron Murray, an interesting tidbit:

Quote:

The Chiefs already have starter Alex Smith, backup Chase Daniel and developmental quarterback Tyler Bray.

The Chiefs could save $1.4 million if they were to release Daniel. Bray, though, seems the most vulnerable. Although the Chiefs love his arm strength, he was slow to grasp the pro system.

Murray likely won't have those issues since he already has played in a pro passing system at Georgia.

In58men 05-11-2014 11:51 AM

Mr. Tomahawk to his defense in 3...2...1......

htismaqe 05-11-2014 11:52 AM

Not real surprising.

Baby Lee 05-11-2014 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10623185)
Not real credible in this situation at this moment.

FYP

OnTheWarpath15 05-11-2014 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10623185)
Not real surprising.

Nope. But I'd still prefer to ditch Daniel and let him keep learning along with Murray.

Like I said in another thread: who buys lottery tickets and never bothers to scratch them?

htismaqe 05-11-2014 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 10623186)
FYP

Oh quit it, you.

htismaqe 05-11-2014 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10623187)
Nope. But I'd still prefer to ditch Daniel and let him keep learning along with Murray.

Like I said in another thread: who buys lottery tickets and never bothers to scratch them?

I want them to cut Daniel.

I expect them to keep Daniel and cut Bray.

Easy 6 05-11-2014 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10623187)
Nope. But I'd still prefer to ditch Daniel and let him keep learning along with Murray.

Like I said in another thread: who buys lottery tickets and never bothers to scratch them?

Hot damn, you and I agree on something.

In58men 05-11-2014 11:56 AM

They need to cut Daniel.

Mr_Tomahawk 05-11-2014 11:56 AM

Ahhhhhhhhhhh! [charlie Brown]

Mr_Tomahawk 05-11-2014 11:57 AM

"Was"

He has a grasp of it now

OnTheWarpath15 05-11-2014 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10623190)
I want them to cut Daniel.

I expect them to keep Daniel and cut Bray.

Sadly, same here.

htismaqe 05-11-2014 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10623198)
"Was"

He has a grasp of it now

:Poke:

jspchief 05-11-2014 11:59 AM

Like I said in the position battle thread, the best chance is that Murray is so impressive that he leapfrogs into the #2 spot, which coincidentally makes Bray more disposable anyway. It really just comes down to saving a small bit of salary.

jd1020 05-11-2014 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 10623202)
Like I said in the position battle thread, the best chance is that Murray is so impressive that he leapfrogs into the #2 spot, which coincidentally makes Bray more disposable anyway. It really just comes down to saving a small bit of salary.

If Murray leap frogs all the way up to #2 there's no way in hell the Chiefs pay Daniel that much money to sit on the inactive list.

FringeNC 05-11-2014 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10623190)
I want them to cut Daniel.

I expect them to keep Daniel and cut Bray.

Who knows. Flanagan's comments aren't surprising, but they are the first I've read. Ironically, Bray's status could depend on whether Murray is as pro-ready as his supporters claim. If so, maybe Daniel is expendable and you keep the long-term project.

Mr_Tomahawk 05-11-2014 12:04 PM

So we cut Bray and keep two undersized QBs?

jd1020 05-11-2014 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10623213)
So we cut Bray and keep two undersized QBs?

What's the difference?

Dunerdr 05-11-2014 12:06 PM

Lies!

Mr_Tomahawk 05-11-2014 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10623215)
What's the difference?

Like 2 inches.

Saccopoo 05-11-2014 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10623207)
If Murray leap frogs all the way up to #2 there's no way in hell the Chiefs pay Daniel that much money to sit on the inactive list.

How the **** is Murray going to leap frog Daniel when he's basically Daniel with a worse release, less poise, less athleticism, less experience, etc.? He's a poor man's Chase Daniel.

They are the same ****ing guy with the exception that Daniel didn't shit down his leg with the regularity that Murray did.

Anybody thinking that Murray gives you anything over Daniel is a reerun. Flat out, full on reerun.

Murray was a ****ing waste of a pick.

**** that guy. **** that pick.

jd1020 05-11-2014 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10623221)
Like 2 inches.

Daniel is taller than Bray when he's standing on the field and Bray is sitting on the bench.

jd1020 05-11-2014 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10623224)
How the **** is Murray going to leap frog Daniel when he's basically Daniel with a worse release, less poise, less athleticism, less experience, etc.? He's a poor man's Chase Daniel.

They are the same ****ing guy with the exception that Daniel didn't shit down his leg with the regularity that Murray did.

Anybody thinking that Murray gives you anything over Daniel is a reerun. Flat out, full on reerun.

Murray was a ****ing waste of a pick.

**** that guy. **** that pick.

Anyone thinking that Daniel gives you more than an experienced clipboard holder is a flat out reerun.

Easy 6 05-11-2014 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10623213)
So we cut Bray and keep two undersized QBs?

Reid doesn't really give a flip about size, he's used undersized guys throughout his career... Detmer, Garcia, Kolb, now Murray... I'm sure theres more.

I'm on your side with Bray, but don't look to his size as some kind of saving grace...

Deberg_1990 05-11-2014 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10623190)
I want them to cut Daniel.

I expect them to keep Daniel and cut Bray.

They wont go into the season without a veteran backup. Daniel has at least proven he can play "ok" in a game.

keg in kc 05-11-2014 12:14 PM

This may be their way of trying to slip him onto the practice squad.

jd1020 05-11-2014 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 10623237)
This may be their way of trying to slip him onto the practice squad.

Slip who on the PS? Bray or Murray? Either way it doesn't matter because neither one would last.

Only way they keep all 4 is if they put Murray on IR.

Mr_Tomahawk 05-11-2014 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 10623237)
This may be their way of trying to slip him onto the practice squad.

Bray wouldn't last on the PS, he'd get snatched up.

keg in kc 05-11-2014 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10623243)
Bray wouldn't last on the PS, he'd get snatched up.

I realize that. But it may be what they're trying to do. Poison the well, as it were.

Saccopoo 05-11-2014 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10623233)
Anyone thinking that Daniel gives you more than an experienced clipboard holder is a flat out reerun.

Agreed.

So why people are excited about pissing away a draft pick on a dude that is not even as good as our incumbent experienced clipboard holder is beyond me.

Saccopoo 05-11-2014 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 10623237)
This may be their way of trying to slip him onto the practice squad.

That's a waste of a roster spot. Even a practice squad roster spot.

keg in kc 05-11-2014 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10623250)
That's a waste of a roster spot. Even a practice squad roster spot.

You're a waste of bulletin board space. Yet here you are.

BlackHelicopters 05-11-2014 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10623221)
Like 2 inches.

TWSS

Exoter175 05-11-2014 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theelusiveeightrop (Post 10623261)
TWSS

http://0.media.collegehumor.cvcdn.co...-micdrop07.gif

chiefzilla1501 05-11-2014 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 10623236)
They wont go into the season without a veteran backup. Daniel has at least proven he can play "ok" in a game.

Daniel was captain checkdown all game long. He was garbage and still is.

That being said, I think the Chiefs keep 4 QBs. The way they've approached their entire roster, I don't think they like paying Daniel that much money but feel obligated until they find his replacement. Murray is very unlikely to leapfrog to backup this season. I think next year, Daniel is almost definitely cut if Murray progresses as we think he should.

Chiefaholic 05-11-2014 12:32 PM

I'm a Mizzou fan and loved Daniel as a Tiger. However, He's making too much dough as a clipboard holder and zero potential as an everyday starter. The money can be put to better use as part of Houston's extension

Deberg_1990 05-11-2014 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10623272)
Daniel was captain checkdown all game long. He was garbage and still is.

That being said, I think the Chiefs keep 4 QBs. The way they've approached their entire roster, I don't think they like paying Daniel that much money but feel obligated until they find his replacement. Murray is very unlikely to leapfrog to backup this season. I think next year, Daniel is almost definitely cut if Murray progresses as we think he should.

I think its Smith, Daniel and Murray this year....with Murray being deactivated most games.

But yes, it would be nice if Murray leapfrogs Daniel next season.

chiefzilla1501 05-11-2014 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10623224)
How the **** is Murray going to leap frog Daniel when he's basically Daniel with a worse release, less poise, less athleticism, less experience, etc.? He's a poor man's Chase Daniel.

They are the same ****ing guy with the exception that Daniel didn't shit down his leg with the regularity that Murray did.

Anybody thinking that Murray gives you anything over Daniel is a reerun. Flat out, full on reerun.

Murray was a ****ing waste of a pick.

**** that guy. **** that pick.

C'mon, dude. They are much different players. Many of Murray's problems are coachable. Murray has a better arm and accuracy, and has proven he can run a pro offense and has upside to be a really smart QB. Daniel was a spread QB who in his experience as a pro QB is a pure one-read then check down QB with some athleticism.

Easy 6 05-11-2014 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10623248)
Agreed.

So why people are excited about pissing away a draft pick on a dude that is not even as good as our incumbent experienced clipboard holder is beyond me.

Be honest, you have absolutely no way of knowing whether or not Murray can be better than Daniel at this point.

No idea, no clue... be honest.

Idahojim 05-11-2014 12:50 PM

If Smith goes down
 
Who would you rather have of the three. Anyone remember how good Daniel looked in the San Diego game? Anyone remember the name of his mentor - that short guy in New Orleans. Bray will be the odd man out. As he should be.

Discuss Thrower 05-11-2014 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10623243)
Bray wouldn't last on the PS, he'd get snatched up.

Only if Tennessee wants an in-depth and personal scouting report.

mdchiefsfan 05-11-2014 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10623207)
If Murray leap frogs all the way up to #2 there's no way in hell the Chiefs pay Daniel that much money to sit on the inactive list.

We can only pray that happens. It is pretty rough having that much money on the pine as it is.

notorious 05-11-2014 01:03 PM

Damnit.


Fake a Smith injury, get Bray in there against a shitty defense and run some basic plays.


He will Wow everyone, and we can flip him for a 3rd next year.

Tribal Warfare 05-11-2014 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10623234)
Reid doesn't really give a flip about size, he's used undersized guys throughout his career... Detmer, Garcia, Kolb, now Murray... I'm sure theres more.

I'm on your side with Bray, but don't look to his size as some kind of saving grace...

Matt Hasselbeck and Mark Brunnell should be included

mdchiefsfan 05-11-2014 01:08 PM

Preseason is going to kick ass this year. Can't wait.

Valiant 05-11-2014 01:10 PM

Or maybe, like some players. He needs to play to understand.

Easy 6 05-11-2014 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10623337)
Matt Hasselbeck and Mark Brunnell should be included

Brunell to an extent, but Reid probably had pretty much no personnel say with him... Hasselbeck, I'd have to disagree, he's 6'4.

milkman 05-11-2014 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Idahojim (Post 10623301)
Who would you rather have of the three. Anyone remember how good Daniel looked in the San Diego game? Anyone remember the name of his mentor - that short guy in New Orleans. Bray will be the odd man out. As he should be.

Anyone remember who was Matt Cassel's mentor in New England?

Sully 05-11-2014 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10623234)
Reid doesn't really give a flip about size, he's used undersized guys throughout his career... Detmer, Garcia, Kolb, now Murray... I'm sure theres more.



I'm on your side with Bray, but don't look to his size as some kind of saving grace...


Kolb is undersized?

Easy 6 05-11-2014 02:25 PM

Yeah, if the understudy has any real talent begging to be whittled into shape and brought forth, a HOF mentor is a great thing to have... but a turds a turd no matter how much of a genius his teacher is.

Easy 6 05-11-2014 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully (Post 10623483)
Kolb is undersized?

Eh, at 6'3 220 you probably have me there, he honestly doesn't look that big though.

Even though its probably a lot closer to 6'2 212, he isn't exactly small.

BWillie 05-11-2014 02:34 PM

That's cuz he's a mouth breather

Strongside 05-11-2014 02:36 PM

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/2813...e-reerun-o.gif

Fairplay 05-11-2014 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 10623194)
They need to cut Daniel.


I believe they will he is an expense they don't need.

I expect the QB order will be Smith, Murray then Bray.

Saccopoo 05-11-2014 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10623283)
Be honest, you have absolutely no way of knowing whether or not Murray can be better than Daniel at this point.

No idea, no clue... be honest.

Nope.

But based on his size and measurables and tendencies at the same level, he is, at best, the same guy. And Daniel definitely had more poise at the college level. Murray did some really stupid shit throughout his career.

I fail to see the reason why people would be excited by Murray when he's the same guy as Daniel with less experience and less athleticism. Plus his mechanics aren't very good.

What do you get with Murray that you don't already have in Daniel?

Nothing.

Easy 6 05-11-2014 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10623563)
What do you get with Murray that you don't already have in Daniel?

The same guy for a lot less money?

saphojunkie 05-11-2014 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10623563)
Nope.

But based on his size and measurables and tendencies at the same level, he is, at best, the same guy. And Daniel definitely had more poise at the college level. Murray did some really stupid shit throughout his career.

I fail to see the reason why people would be excited by Murray when he's the same guy as Daniel with less experience and less athleticism. Plus his mechanics aren't very good.

What do you get with Murray that you don't already have in Daniel?

Nothing.

Well he's no first round guard, that's for sure.

Baby Lee 05-11-2014 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10623522)

Shoo shoo reeruned flu!!

Chief Roundup 05-11-2014 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10623198)
"Was"

He has a grasp of it now

Was still means that he is behind. If he struggled he probably always will struggle.

Chief Roundup 05-11-2014 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10623224)
How the **** is Murray going to leap frog Daniel when he's basically Daniel with a worse release, less poise, less athleticism, less experience, etc.? He's a poor man's Chase Daniel.

They are the same ****ing guy with the exception that Daniel didn't shit down his leg with the regularity that Murray did.

Anybody thinking that Murray gives you anything over Daniel is a reerun. Flat out, full on reerun.

Murray was a ****ing waste of a pick.

**** that guy. **** that pick.

You are so full of shit on this.
There is not one scout that has said anything like this.

58-4ever 05-11-2014 03:47 PM

I think Bray is slow to grasp life in general. If you've ever seen any interview with the poor kid, you'd be surprised that he survived life without a helmet. Tennessee must have some easy classes.

58-4ever 05-11-2014 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10623801)
You are so full of shit on this.
There is not one scout that has said anything like this.

Completely agree. I'm looking forward to seeing them stand side by side in camp. They are completely different body types and players.

ChiTown 05-11-2014 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10623612)
The same guy for a lot less money?

And more upside

RealSNR 05-11-2014 04:02 PM

When God made Tyler Bray, he sacrificed a few of Bray's brain cells to give him better arm strength.

RealSNR 05-11-2014 04:08 PM

Why is Daniel this experienced veteran? The dude has made ONE start in his NFL career, and that was because his coach said, "Ehh, **** it. Why not?"

We're still raped six ways to Sunday if Alex Smith goes down. You may as well throw the rookie out there if it happens.

CaliforniaChief 05-11-2014 04:11 PM

Ideally, you bring 'em all in to TC and let them battle. You hope that another team loses a QB to injury and remember how well Chase Daniel played in that one game...and then you give 'em the Matt Flynn special, acquiring a mid-late round pick in 2015 to go along with all of the compensatory picks and high picks we'll have from a shitty season.

Smith, Murray, Bray.

J Diddy 05-11-2014 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10623886)
Why is Daniel this experienced veteran? The dude has made ONE start in his NFL career, and that was because his coach said, "Ehh, **** it. Why not?"

We're still raped six ways to Sunday if Alex Smith goes down. You may as well throw the rookie out there if it happens.

This.

Unfortunately some people are stuck on the notion that throwing a rookie qb in the game could/will ruin him. I feel that that notion has been dispelled.

milkman 05-11-2014 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dick Bull (Post 10623942)
This.

Unfortunately some people are stuck on the notion that throwing a rookie qb in the game could/will ruin him. I feel that that notion has been dispelled.

I don't agree.

I think it depends on the QB.

farmerchief 05-11-2014 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10623563)
Nope.


What do you get with Murray that you don't already have in Daniel?

Nothing.

His cap friendly contract!;)

RippedmyFlesh 05-11-2014 04:46 PM

Murray is competition. There was 0 competition last year at qb with all 3 roles clearly defined. Daniel Bray Murray, no one can say today who will be the best come sept. At least we know reid will let qb's compete. Murray went against better D's in college than Daniel and ran a lot of pro style O instead of a spread. And I think he has a better deep ball than Daniel.

jkw87 05-11-2014 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10623886)
Why is Daniel this experienced veteran? The dude has made ONE start in his NFL career, and that was because his coach said, "Ehh, **** it. Why not?"

We're still raped six ways to Sunday if Alex Smith goes down. You may as well throw the rookie out there if it happens.

Pretty much this. Except we saw how that worked out when Cassel went down and they played Palko. Obviously a terrible example because all three suck donkey dick, but all coaches value veterans (with no experience) over rookies

007 05-11-2014 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10623221)
Like 2 inches.

Thats what she said

Reerun_KC 05-11-2014 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10623243)
Bray wouldn't last on the PS, he'd get snatched up.

Well bye. He is nothing more then a cp folklore pin up poster for those fans Who stalk and beat off to obscure players.

Lightrise 05-11-2014 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10623213)
So we cut Bray and keep two undersized QBs?

I don't see that happening either. Bray is still young, 22 I think. They won't turn him loose yet. I can see him possibly landing in Tampa and I hate to say it, but it wouldn't surprise me if he landed in Denver if we cut him. Not sure I could take that.

Bewbies 05-11-2014 05:40 PM

Murray with either be on IR or will be the #2. Daniel is on the bubble, not Bray.

Eleazar 05-11-2014 05:54 PM

It won't be Daniel who is cut. You'd then have no one behind Alex Smith who's ever taken a snap as a pro.

tk13 05-11-2014 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 10624242)
It won't be Daniel who is cut. You'd then have no one behind Alex Smith who's ever taken a snap as a pro.

I agree, I think that makes it unlikely it's Daniel. But it's probably happened before. Depends on what their goals are this year.

The bigger issue here is people are acting like Bray is not a UDFA. Cutting him is not the atrocity cutting a 2nd or 3rd round pick would be. It's not like they've invested that much in him.

King_Chief_Fan 05-11-2014 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 10623180)
http://msn.foxsports.com/kansas-city...-murray-051014

In a puff piece on Aaron Murray, an interesting tidbit:

Tyler can pack his bags...he has been replaced

jd1020 05-11-2014 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 10624248)
The bigger issue here is people are acting like Bray is not a UDFA. Cutting him is not the atrocity cutting a 2nd or 3rd round pick would be. It's not like they've invested that much in him.

No one is acting like it is except for maybe Tomahawk, since he's bobbed off his dick a couple times.

Cutting Daniel has no lesser effect on this team other than saving on the cap and getting rid of a useless pos who's only ever held a clipboard in his life and is making $3mil a year.

Bewbies 05-11-2014 06:01 PM

Daniel has 1 start. He's not some seasoned vet. If Murray isn't on IR he's toast.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.