Clayton said
said that the Chiefs are still interested in Law.
He said he's looking better athletically and one other team is interested but not at the 4 mill that he wants. I don't get it. Thought Law wasn't interested. Clayton not doing the research ? |
It's throw-me-a-bone season as far as NFL beat writers go...
|
I think Clayton does his research. It's also sorta a dead week for the NFL, maybe the most dead its ever been but it'll get full blown once training camp starts and heads on to the season.
Ty Law wants someone to show him the money. He'd go to KC if they showed him it, he likes Vermeil supposedly. |
Ty Law is to Chiefs
as Corvette is to 16 year old with paper route |
No chance. We need our cash for draft picks. DJ has not signed.
|
Quote:
|
Draft picks are in a different salary cap
|
Down to 1 other team, huh?
Maybe I'll ammend my prediction that Law will end up in KC. I STILL doubt that he takes the minimum though. |
Quote:
Am I in error? |
Quote:
|
I really don't see Law coming here but wouldn't it be a nice suprise?
|
It's down to us and one other team? That's hard to believe.
LINK? |
Quote:
They asked him where he thought Law would land... What Clayton said...was... Jacksonville #1 KC #2... and a bunch of others that will only offer minimum. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We can get this deal done. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Whoever brings up "law to KC" possibilities is just like that chick in high school who would tickle your wang for 30 minutes but then stop and say she had to go home
.. the Bitch! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm gonna predict that DJ will sign on September 29, 2005. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
dj will sign before the 29th of sept...
carl only has it out for mormon's. LOL!!!!
|
Quote:
|
Saw a bit on the local sports the other night that said the Chiefs really want Law. If it happens, Warfield would be moved to the nickel and McCleon would be shown the door.
Works for me! :toast: |
At the moment, how much money does McCleon make?? There are ways around the salary cap for a given year. the question is do we want to screw ourselves in years later.
|
Quote:
|
We have 3.5 million in cap space AFTER the rookie pool allotment. Why is it we can't sign him? Someone please explain because to me we are positioned perfectly to do so.
Dave |
quit teasing me!
|
Quote:
|
I bet that golden ticket makes Ty Law terrible.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The only way a base salary is NOT guarenteed is if he gets cut from the team. But, once he makes the team, he gets his money. So he could most definately sign a one year deal for a total of four million, and if Lamar is short on actual cash, he could get any amount of it as a signing bonus and the rest throughout the season (as the revenue starts coming in). There IS one possibility that few have mentioned where the contract could be structured as a minimum salary, and the 4 million could be written in as a "likely to be earned" bonus for starting so many games or for being on the field for so many plays. Those are not "guarenteed" per-say, but are easily attainable if he is fully recovered. That kind of contract he probably would not sign, but it could be in the Chiefs' best interests to offer something like that. A healthy Ty Law at 4 mil is a fantastic deal. Lastly, the rookie pool is counted in with the total salary cap number ALREADY. When somebody says "the Chiefs are 2 million dollars under the cap," I believe that number is already including the numbers that all the rookies will eventually sign for, since that rookie number is pre determined. |
Quote:
Perfect. Sign him to a two year deal. Give him a 3.3 million dollar signing bonus and the vet minimum (I think that's 700K). There's your 4 million. Make next years base salary 4 million. His cap number will only be 2 million and change this year, and then we can cut him and take a 1.65 million cap hit next year, or keep him on the roster for 4 million (and a cap number of 5.65 million). Pretty reasonable for Ty Law. |
The longer this thing holds out, the more I think we'll surprise a bunch of people and sign him.
That, and I think Warfield, at the maximum, will be suspended just 2 games. |
Quote:
Wouldn't even let ya bust a nut with a handy. |
We should know more in 48 hours, btw.
|
Quote:
:hmmm: what makes ya say that? |
OK, how much is Warfield making? I know it's not a small sum, is it worth paying a nickle so much money?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Corners are expensive. That's all there is to it. And a nickle corner can be on the field quite a bit. The reasons not to sign Law should not have anything to do with Warfield's salary, IMO. It should purely be a cost/benifit analysis with TY. Is he worth four million dollars? Probably. Do we have that kind of money to spend? Probably not. Can we make it work? Probably. Is it worth the risk of using the last of our cap dollars for a guy who might not be completely recovered? Probably not... |
Quote:
Having Law and Surtain, is like bringing back the days when we saw James Hasty and Dale Carter. :drool: |
Quote:
*btw, Law owns Harrison |
Quote:
I just hope we get him. :) |
You still need to sign Johnson and he's not a push over either. You just signed one of the most, if not the most, praised defensive players in this draft.
You're signing alot of guys that cost alot of money. If you're going to take the cake you might as well eat it too, I'll give up the gay ice cream (Eric Warfield) for extra presents (Ty Law -Super Bowl) |
Quote:
I give out rep for any and all metaphors that I don't understand... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You know... It kinda is. You look at life and you think. Ahh shit, now I've got THIS to deal with. But if you look close enough, it's actually kinda sweet. I just don't get how ICE CREAM can be GAY, and what that has to do with Eric Warfield.... :shake: |
Quote:
two words my friend... Lesbian Cows |
Quote:
I'm just here to help... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's freaking hysterical. You gotta love the internet man. You can literally find ANYTHING. I'd give you rep, but I just did. |
Quote:
|
The reason I'd like to see the Chiefs add Law is because of the real possiblity that Surtain could go down to an injury. Then the situation at corner could be even worse than last year with the Warfield suspension looming. Having Law, Surtain, and Warfield along with McCleon (possibly), Ambrose, Sapp and Hodge would give the Chiefs alot of depth and more importantly, TALENT, at the CB position.
JMO. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.