ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Who else thinks Perrera's got some 'splainin to do this week? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=135230)

B_Ambuehl 02-05-2006 09:37 PM

Who else thinks Perrera's got some 'splainin to do this week?
 
Can't wait to here what the head of officials has to say this week. I wasn't really rooting for either team just wanted to see a close game. It's bad enough Seattle left the win out on the field through their own poor execution but they seemed to be battling not only a road type atmosphere but the officiating that comes along with that. Many particular calls i'm interested in:

1. That pushoff call that took away Seattle's 1st TD (c'mon man that didn't interfere with the result of the play)
2. That questionable illegal block on Warricks long punt return (which I don't recall seeing on replay).
3. That bullshit holding call on Stevens long pass reception in the 4th Quarter in what perhaps should've been an offsides call instead.
4. That bullshit touchdown call on Roethlisbergers touchdown
5. That blatant holding call that wasn't called against Pittsburgh on one of Ben's scrambles for a first down in the 2nd half.
6. Another questionable holding call against Seattle in the 1st quarter that took away a completion inside the 20 on 2nd down and led to a punt.

edit: and a couple more I now remember:

7. That bullshit timeout that was awarded to pittsburgh in the 2nd half in what should've been a definite delay of game.
8. That 15 yd penalty against Hasselbeck for an illegal block in what was an obvious attempt at driving through a blocker for a tackle.
9. An obvious horsecollar tackle that wasn't called against Pittsburgh in the 2nd half.

ARROW2 02-05-2006 10:01 PM

Worst officiated Super Bowl I have ever witnessed....

penguinz 02-05-2006 10:02 PM

What needs 'splainin' is why you are still allowed to post on this board.

Hammock Parties 02-05-2006 10:03 PM

No.

Seattle had a chance to take the lead and blew it.

Then their defense blew it.

Game over.

wutamess 02-05-2006 10:04 PM

What about the hog tie tackle of Stevens a couple of plays after that BS holding call to get the ball to the 2 yard line?

dirk digler 02-05-2006 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gopaint
No.

Seattle had a chance to take the lead and blew it.

Then their defense blew it.

Game over.

Disagree..the refs screwed them out of taking the lead on a phantom O pass interference and a phantom holding call.

BigMeatballDave 02-05-2006 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gopaint
No.

Seattle had a chance to take the lead and blew it.

Then their defense blew it.

Game over.

Not to mention the fact that their O was completely non-existant. Seattle looked flat. Period. They have noone to blame but themselves...

wutamess 02-05-2006 10:05 PM

Besides... I thought it was illegal to make that kind of tackle anymore. Even though I've seen it done numerous times after the rule was put into effect, I've never seen it called.

BigRock 02-05-2006 10:06 PM

Remember this? :hmmm: :hmmm:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2247517

Quote:

Seattle Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren violated league policy by publicly divulging information that the NFL apologized for blowing a couple touchdown calls last week against the New York Giants. Now, he's paying for it.

Sources told ESPN's Chris Mortensen that Holmgren has been blackballed by the league's officiating office.........

Hammock Parties 02-05-2006 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler
Disagree..the refs screwed them out of taking the lead on a phantom O pass interference and a phantom holding call.

The refs did not decide the game. It was 14-10 and then Seattle's defense gave up the long TD pass.

Miles 02-05-2006 10:07 PM

It was those two UT defensive players fault.

tk13 02-05-2006 10:07 PM

Seattle had chances to win that game and didn't... they had an INT deep in Pit territory and missed 2 FG's. I thought the PI call was ticky tack though for sure, which has been par for the course in these playoffs. Probably one of the worst officiated playoff seasons I can remember. I don't think it was quite Super Bowl quality officiating out there, but what can ya do.

Simplex3 02-05-2006 10:08 PM

There are few things funnier than a Broncos troll bitching about lopsided officiating.

ARROW2 02-05-2006 10:09 PM

Gift wrapped from the start.....

dirk digler 02-05-2006 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gopaint
The refs did not decide the game. It was 14-10 and then Seattle's defense gave up the long TD pass.

ROFL

No that O-PI that took away a TD had no bearing on the game or the phantom holding call that negated a 1st and goal on the 2 yd line. :rolleyes:

KC Dan 02-05-2006 10:12 PM

There will be ni splaining. The NFL got their 2 Billion for the game. They dont give a shit.

B_Ambuehl 02-05-2006 10:12 PM

Quote:

Remember this?

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2247517

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seattle Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren violated league policy by publicly divulging information that the NFL apologized for blowing a couple touchdown calls last week against the New York Giants. Now, he's paying for it.

Sources told ESPN's Chris Mortensen that Holmgren has been blackballed by the league's officiating office.........
Shit man good call! There ya go. I'd forgotten all about that.

bkkcoh 02-05-2006 10:15 PM

I wonder if Porter is going to personally thank the refs for giving the game... :hmmm:

Garcia Bronco 02-05-2006 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13
Seattle had chances to win that game and didn't... .

That's the saddest part.

chief52 02-05-2006 10:18 PM

4. That bullshit touchdown call on Roethlisbergers touchdown

They could not overturn that. There was no evidence to do so. I believe it was the right call. The ball crossed the plane before he was hit and knocked back. Good call by the official on the field and looking at the replay.

The officials played no part what so ever in the who won this game. The Steelers deserve the win.

dirk digler 02-05-2006 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief52
4. That bullshit touchdown call on Roethlisbergers touchdown

They could not overturn that. There was no evidence to do so. I believe it was the right call. The ball crossed the plane before he was hit and knocked back. Good call by the official on the field and looking at the replay.

The officials played no part what so ever in the who won this game. The Steelers deserve the win.

I personally thought it was a shitty call...To me the ball didn't touch anypart of the goal line. In the end I don't think that call is not that big of a deal, they could have gone for it on 4th down and probably would have scored the TD

1punkyQB 02-05-2006 10:24 PM

Quote:

The officials played no part what so ever in the who won this game. The Steelers deserve the win.
The officials did decide the game, and I say that as someone who wanted the Steelers to win. Besides the examples already stated, Pittsburgh should've been penalized for delay of game with about 4 mins. left but was awarded a TO. The officials took points off the board for Seattle, and if that's not deciding who won the game, what is? It almost made me glad the Chiefs weren't there. I couldn't stand to be on the bad end of that. Imagine the Dallas game taking place during the SB.

chief52 02-05-2006 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler
I personally thought it was a shitty call...To me the ball didn't touch anypart of the goal line. In the end I don't think that call is not that big of a deal, they could have gone for it on 4th down and probably would have scored the TD

I thought it crossed the plane before he was hit, but there was not enough evidence either way. Whatever was called on the field was going to stand with the shot they were showing.

You are right, they would have most likely scored any way.

chief52 02-05-2006 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1punkyQB
The officials did decide the game, and I say that as someone who wanted the Steelers to win. Besides the examples already stated, Pittsburgh should've been penalized for delay of game with about 4 mins. left but was awarded a TO. The officials took points off the board for Seattle, and if that's not deciding who won the game, what is? It almost made me glad the Chiefs weren't there. I couldn't stand to be on the bad end of that. Imagine the Dallas game taking place during the SB.

WOW!!! I am assuming you watched the game at a bar? You should watch a tape. The officials played no part in the out come of this game. Seattle had chances and failed to capitalize. After you watch the tape I am sure you will understand.

wutamess 02-05-2006 10:31 PM

Another *****ed up call.

In the first qtr... Jeremy Stevens fumbled the ball after taking 2 steps to turn around to go upfield. The dickheads prematurely blew the whistle and called it incomplete instead of a fumble.

I know it's against the grain but just another example of how poorly officiated this game was.

dirk digler 02-05-2006 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief52
WOW!!! I am assuming you watched the game at a bar? You should watch a tape. The officials played no part in the out come of this game. Seattle had chances and failed to capitalize. After you watch the tape I am sure you will understand.

I hope that is your sarcastic tone because if it isn't you were stoned during the game. It was the worst officiated game I have ever seen in a SB...totally pathetic and embarrassing

RedThat 02-05-2006 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz
What needs 'splainin' is why you are still allowed to post on this board.

Shut the fuck up....The man has a point, the officiating was horrid. Totally in favor of Pittsburgh.

There were a lot of questionable calls in that game. Its obvious who the NFL wanted to win.

If you don't like what he posts, then don't post yourself. Your post sucks, and it's cheap.

dirk digler 02-05-2006 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wutamess
Another *****ed up call.

In the first qtr... Jeremy Stevens fumbled the ball after taking 2 steps to turn around to go upfield. The dickheads prematurely blew the whistle and called it incomplete instead of a fumble.

I know it's against the grain but just another example of how poorly officiated this game was.

Yep really bad call as well..

I think the NFL needs to go back to the best officiating crew instead of the best officials. When you make these guys work with people they have never worked with before or for a long time I don't think it works out very well.

chief52 02-05-2006 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler
I hope that is your sarcastic tone because if it isn't you were stoned during the game. It was the worst officiated game I have ever seen in a SB...totally pathetic and embarrassing

Yes, I was being sarcastic and probably not in a very good way. There were some problems, but the Steelers deserved the win in my opinion. I was not rooting for them in any way. The officials did not change the out come in my mind.

penguinz 02-05-2006 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull
Shut the fuck up....The man has a point, the officiating was horrid. Totally in favor of Pittsburgh.

There were a lot of questionable calls in that game. Its obvious who the NFL wanted to win.

If you don't like what he posts, then don't post yourself. Your post sucks, and it's cheap.

And this post of yours is better how? Go suck on your mommy's tit.

1punkyQB 02-05-2006 10:44 PM

Quote:

WOW!!! I am assuming you watched the game at a bar? You should watch a tape. The officials played no part in the out come of this game. Seattle had chances and failed to capitalize. After you watch the tape I am sure you will understand.
Nope, didn't watch it in a bar, and you haven't viewed the game on tape yet either since it hasn't been over that long. I'm guessing you aren't a neutral observer either. Do you think that Darnell Jackson did commit PI? If not, it took points off the board and factored into the outcome of the game. Same with the numerous other penalties. What on tape will be shown that wasn't seen on numerous replays? Should I keep rewinding and playing until it looks like a holding penalty occurred where there wasn't one?

RedThat 02-05-2006 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Ambuehl
1. That pushoff call that took away Seattle's 1st TD (c'mon man that didn't interfere with the result of the play)

-I've seen far worse pushoffs from the best receivers, i.e., Moss and get away with it. I agree that was bullsh*t.


Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Ambuehl
2. That questionable illegal block on Warricks long punt return (which I don't recall seeing on replay).

-Didn't see the illegal block. I agree.


Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Ambuehl
3. That bullshit holding call on Stevens long pass reception in the 4th Quarter.

-Totally bullsh*t. Haggans jumped offsides, Locklear didn't hold em. that led to 50 yard FG miss by Brown.


Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Ambuehl
4. That bullshit touchdown call on Roethlisbergers touchdown

-I disagree. That was a touchdown. The nose of the football barely touched the touched the goaline.

Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Ambuehl
5. That blatant holding call that wasn't called against Pittsburgh on one of Ben's scrambles for a first down in the 2nd half.

-I saw that. Yes that was Holding. Totally blown call.


Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Ambuehl
6. Another questionable holding call against Seattle in the 1st quarter that took away a completion inside the 20 on 2nd down and led to a punt.

-That was holding. I disagree.

chief52 02-05-2006 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1punkyQB
Nope, didn't watch it in a bar, and you haven't viewed the game on tape yet either since it hasn't been over that long. I'm guessing you aren't a neutral observer either. Do you think that Darnell Jackson did commit PI? If not, it took points off the board and factored into the outcome of the game. Same with the numerous other penalties. What on tape will be shown that wasn't seen on numerous replays? Should I keep rewinding and playing until it looks like a holding penalty occurred where there wasn't one?

I honestly do not feel it changed the out come of the game. The Seahawks had chances and did not take advantage of them. Mistakes in officiating were made, but it did not in any way affect the outcome. It is part of the game and always will be.

RedThat 02-05-2006 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz
And this post of yours is better how? Go suck on your mommy's tit.

Whatever dude. Your an idiot.

penguinz 02-05-2006 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull
Whatever dude. Your an idiot.

You are using the word dude and I am the idiot?

Phobia 02-05-2006 10:53 PM

Stephens dropped more balls than Johnnie Morton during testosterone martini night at the Lavendar Umbrella Men's Club.

RedThat 02-05-2006 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz
You are using the word dude and I am the idiot?

So what?

You want me to call you a dumbass? Is that what you want? what do you want?

Nightwish 02-05-2006 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler
ROFL

No that O-PI that took away a TD had no bearing on the game or the phantom holding call that negated a 1st and goal on the 2 yd line. :rolleyes:

The holding call was very questionable, but the Offensive Pass Interference call was not. It was a little bit petty, because the infraction was a common and minor push-off, but the push-off was there, and it was still illegal no matter how many times refs generally let people get away with it. People push off like that all the time, and one of the best at it is our own Tony G, but it is still an illegal move, so there's not much point in complaining about an illegal move getting flagged.

1punkyQB 02-05-2006 10:59 PM

The Steelers missed numerous opportunities also. That pick inside the 10 being the worst. If they had lost, we'd be talking about their slow start in the 1st quarter doing them in. Any game has missed opportunities by both teams. A game, particularly a Super Bowl, should never be decided by officials. And a penalty can kill a drive. They're getting paid too and asking for competency isn't really asking for much.

Phobia 02-05-2006 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz
You are using the word dude and I am the idiot?

Shit. I know I'm an idiot and everything, but I didn't know I was an idiot because I use "dude" frequently.

Nightwish 02-05-2006 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wutamess
Another *****ed up call.

In the first qtr... Jeremy Stevens fumbled the ball after taking 2 steps to turn around to go upfield. The dickheads prematurely blew the whistle and called it incomplete instead of a fumble.

I know it's against the grain but just another example of how poorly officiated this game was.

Just two quick things on that one: 1) that one may well have worked for Seattle rather than against, as the pursuer who was about to pick up the ball abandoned the chase when they blew it dead, otherwise it would have been a fumble recovered by Pittsburgh. 2) it was a good call -- the receiver has to establish possession then get two steps down. He never had possession, as the replays showed, because the whole time he was turning he was juggling the ball and trying to tuck it in. He got hit before he got it tucked or under control, thus he lost it. Good call.

Nzoner 02-05-2006 11:07 PM

I've been trying to tell everyone for years,you really need to read the book Interference.


If football is the American religion, and the NFL its Vatican, then Dan Moldea is a heretic and excommunication is already in progress. Moldea is fighting back with a $10 million libel suit against the New York Times for its review of this book by sportswriter Gerald Eskenazi, an NFL mouthpiece.

Moldea chronicles the long-standing relationship between the NFL and organized crime, which has resulted in no fewer than 26 past and present NFL team owners with documented ties to either gambling or the syndicate, evidence of 70 fixed professional games, and the suppression of at least 50 law enforcement investigations of NFL corruption. This book also offers an introduction to the world of betting lines, oddsmakers and handicappers, bookmakers, and high-stakes gambling.

This is one of four books in NameBase by Dan Moldea, who has specialized in organized crime investigations since 1974.


"The best book on the NFL's connection to the mob and the American gambling scene was Dan Moldea's groundbreaking Interference. Moldea tore apart the league's papier-mache image and illustrated that, without gamblers, it would have remained on the sandlots." -- John L. Smith, Las Vegas Review-Journal

"Moldea has written perhaps the most important sports book in the history of the language." -- Keith Olbermann, ESPN SportsCenter.

Nightwish 02-05-2006 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull
-I've seen far worse pushoffs from the best receivers, i.e., Moss and get away with it. I agree that was bullsh*t.

It's not a bullsh*t call. It is always illegal for the receiver to push off the defender beyond 5 yards. The fact that the refs usually let them get away with it doesn't make it any less so.

1punkyQB 02-05-2006 11:14 PM

Quote:

It is always illegal for the receiver to push off the defender beyond 5 yards.
I agree that PI isn't called on receivers nearly enough (and I was shocked when it was called on Moss playing at Oakland, no less). The problem is the DB for Pittsburgh had a hand on Jackson prior to that. Isn't that illegal contact, or whatever they're calling that crappy Marvin Harrison rule?

jspchief 02-05-2006 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightwish
It's not a bullsh*t call. It is always illegal for the receiver to push off the defender beyond 5 yards. The fact that the refs usually let them get away with it doesn't make it any less so.

It was bullshit because the refs didn't call the defensive interference when the DB made contact with Jackson on the goal line during that play.

He let the DB put his hands on Jackson on the goal line, which should have been illegal contact. But then got stingy a few steps later when Jackson pushed off. If you're going to call a tight game, at least be consistent.

jettio 02-05-2006 11:35 PM

The most incredibly bad call had to be the penalty on Hasselback for tackling the ballcarrier on the interception return.

It would be hard to be a Seahawks fan today, seeing so many bad calls going aganst one team.

Stinger 02-05-2006 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetto
The most incredibly bad call had to be the penalty on Hasselback for tackling the ballcarrier on the interception return.

It would be hard to be a Seahawks fan today, seeing so many bad calls going aganst one team.

I was totally dumbfounded by that. How can they call blocking below the knees on a clear tackle??

:shake:

Taco John 02-06-2006 12:16 AM

That was the worst officiated game I believe I have ever seen.

What the hell is a zero beat?

Eleazar 02-06-2006 12:18 AM

The officiating was definitely all in favor of Pittsburgh. Seattle still didn't deserve to win, though.

tk13 02-06-2006 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jettio
The most incredibly bad call had to be the penalty on Hasselback for tackling the ballcarrier on the interception return.

It would be hard to be a Seahawks fan today, seeing so many bad calls going aganst one team.

Especially just right after a missed horse collar. Let one ticky tack personal foul go then call another that didn't even happen. That was pretty rough... inconsistent at best.

Taco John 02-06-2006 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise
The officiating was definitely all in favor of Pittsburgh. Seattle still didn't deserve to win, though.


I just have a tough time making that judgement considering that every big play that Seattle made was called back on iffy penalties... while several of the mistakes that Pittsburgh made were magically ignored...

The Zero Beat Time Out is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever seen in all of sports in all my life.

Mr. Flopnuts 02-06-2006 12:27 AM

Maybe Seattle didn't deserve to win that game. However they made more plays than Pittsburg did, so now what? Pretty tough to win a game opportunities or not when it's 15 on 11, and the extra 4 are holdin the fuckin whistles. What really sucks is the game wasn't decided on the field. This super bowl was a fraud and if it went the other way I'd be here sayin the same thing believe it or don't.

Nightwish 02-06-2006 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jettio
The most incredibly bad call had to be the penalty on Hasselback for tackling the ballcarrier on the interception return.

It would be hard to be a Seahawks fan today, seeing so many bad calls going aganst one team.

That one was really bad. Then the announcers tried to make excuses for the ref claiming that he was called for making the block on the blocker rather than on the ball-carrier, though admittedly it could "technically" go either way, because the blocker and the ball-carrier were side-by-side, and he effectively knee-blocked both of them. But I'm pretty sure it was the ball-carrier he was going for.

Nightwish 02-06-2006 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefman420
Maybe Seattle didn't deserve to win that game. However they made more plays than Pittsburg did, so now what? Pretty tough to win a game opportunities or not when it's 15 on 11, and the extra 4 are holdin the fuckin whistles. What really sucks is the game wasn't decided on the field. This super bowl was a fraud and if it went the other way I'd be here sayin the same thing believe it or don't.

Despite the bad officiating, there were a ton of failed opportunities on Seattle's side of the ball that didn't fail because of penalties, they failed because they simply didn't capitalize. Even without the officiating, the Seahawks killed their own game all night long.

Stinger 02-06-2006 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightwish
Despite the bad officiating, there were a ton of failed opportunities on Seattle's side of the ball that didn't fail because of penalties, they failed because they simply didn't capitalize. Even without the officiating, the Seahawks killed their own game all night long.

Agreed how many dropped passes for 1st down did the Seahwks miss. Lost count afrer awhile. But like it or not bad officiating does cause some effect. How much we never know but there is one.

Mr. Flopnuts 02-06-2006 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightwish
Despite the bad officiating, there were a ton of failed opportunities on Seattle's side of the ball that didn't fail because of penalties, they failed because they simply didn't capitalize. Even without the officiating, the Seahawks killed their own game all night long.


I can live with that. What I can't live with is if you take away just half of the bad calls against Seattle they win the game. Take them all away and it's a blowout. Let alone the momentum killing that goes into those bad calls. It's similar to the Chiefs Giants game earlier this year. There were so many horrible calls against the Chiefs early in the game, that they just looked deflated by the midway point of the 2nd quarter. It is what it is, I'm not going to continue lamenting over it. You have to admit though, that game would've been a lot better had it been FULLY decided by the teams involved, instead of the guys wearing half of Pittsburgs colors.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-06-2006 12:41 AM

A horribly officiated postseason capped by the worst-officiated Super Bowl that I remember. (I only remember back to XXIII, though).

Mecca 02-06-2006 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightwish
The holding call was very questionable, but the Offensive Pass Interference call was not. It was a little bit petty, because the infraction was a common and minor push-off, but the push-off was there, and it was still illegal no matter how many times refs generally let people get away with it. People push off like that all the time, and one of the best at it is our own Tony G, but it is still an illegal move, so there's not much point in complaining about an illegal move getting flagged.

Well in that case..........there should be about 12 offensive PI's called per game. Also, Micheal Irvin should have about 10 catches in his career that count.

Valiant 02-06-2006 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Ambuehl
Can't wait to here what the head of officials has to say this week. I wasn't really rooting for either team just wanted to see a close game. It's bad enough Seattle left the win out on the field through their own poor execution but they seemed to be battling not only a road type atmosphere but the officiating that comes along with that. Many particular calls i'm interested in:

1. That pushoff call that took away Seattle's 1st TD (c'mon man that didn't interfere with the result of the play)
2. That questionable illegal block on Warricks long punt return (which I don't recall seeing on replay).
3. That bullshit holding call on Stevens long pass reception in the 4th Quarter in what perhaps should've been an offsides call instead.
4. That bullshit touchdown call on Roethlisbergers touchdown
5. That blatant holding call that wasn't called against Pittsburgh on one of Ben's scrambles for a first down in the 2nd half.
6. Another questionable holding call against Seattle in the 1st quarter that took away a completion inside the 20 on 2nd down and led to a punt.

edit: and a couple more I now remember:

7. That bullshit timeout that was awarded to pittsburgh in the 2nd half in what should've been a definite delay of game.
8. That 15 yd penalty against Hasselbeck for an illegal block in what was an obvious attempt at driving through a blocker for a tackle.
9. An obvious horsecollar tackle that wasn't called against Pittsburgh in the 2nd half.


I did not get to watch the game past the half, but the PI in the endzone was correct... He stiffed arm the DB to get away, It might not have effected the play much but it was still a pushoff.. I get pissed that WR's get away with it that much.. If it was reversed, they would have flagged the DB... So the call was correct...

Now I do agree with Bens rushing TD.. He did not get in..

Pitt Gorilla 02-06-2006 01:14 AM

Roeth's TD was a TD. I don't understand complaining about that one.

Valiant 02-06-2006 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief
It was bullshit because the refs didn't call the defensive interference when the DB made contact with Jackson on the goal line during that play.

He let the DB put his hands on Jackson on the goal line, which should have been illegal contact. But then got stingy a few steps later when Jackson pushed off. If you're going to call a tight game, at least be consistent.


Unless you grab or pushoff that is just incidental contact IMO... He was running his route back and forth and they tangle up, that is fine.. But when the ball is thrown he pushes off to get seperation.. It is a iffy call but it is the correct one.. It is not called enough unfortuneatly, and that is why we get all the complaining..

Valiant 02-06-2006 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla
Roeth's TD was a TD. I don't understand complaining about that one.


I did not see the ball cross the white line on the replays... HIs head did, but the ball did not cross that line from the sideline camera..

Gravedigger 02-06-2006 01:24 AM

Yeah I won't argue that some calls could've changed the game but honestly pittsburgh would've won regardless. Seattle didn't play like the number one offense AT ALL they weren't even playing the same game as pittsburgh. True calls were blown and miscalled but Seattle didn't deserve the win and now everyone is gonna go off about the officiating like it can be changed now.... so starts a three month hiatus up until draft about refereeing :banghead:

Mecca 02-06-2006 01:27 AM

Well come on now, this is the crew that penalized Hasselbeck for making a tackle.........

Taco John 02-06-2006 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravedigger
Yeah I won't argue that some calls could've changed the game but honestly pittsburgh would've won regardless.



I just don't believe that. I was sitting there with a Seahawks buddy, and I was telling him, "Aw, come on man... Your guys have to bounce back from that stuff... And they kept bouncing back... And every time they did, they would get penalized on something stupid. And then the Steelers would do something that got totally overlooked, like call a timeout AFTER the clock had ticked zero, or horse collar tackle a rusher for no penalty.

I honestly believe in a fairly called game, Seattle would have won this game.

jettio 02-06-2006 10:49 AM

When I think of the letter that Joe Seahawk posted about how much a lucky ticket lottery winning Seahawk fan would pay to go and see the game, you have to say that the one thing every team and fan "deserve" is a fairly officated game.

There is no way to say that one team "deserved" to win when there were so many momentum changing bad calls in the game.

As much money as fans shell out to root their team on, that was horrible officiating.

jettio 02-06-2006 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wutamess
Another *****ed up call.

In the first qtr... Jeremy Stevens fumbled the ball after taking 2 steps to turn around to go upfield. The dickheads prematurely blew the whistle and called it incomplete instead of a fumble.

I know it's against the grain but just another example of how poorly officiated this game was.

It would have been interesting to see if any Steeler would have recovered the ball before it went out of bounds if the official was not blowing the whistle.

Seahawks could have challenged that play, and if the play was overturned they would have benefitted from the bad call on that play because they would have credit for the catch and the Steelers would have been denied their opportunity to recover the fumble.

That was another bad call, but unlike all of the other crap calls, that was reviewable and the Seahawks failed to challenge it.

Basileus777 02-06-2006 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jettio
It would have been interesting to see if any Steeler would have recovered the ball before it went out of bounds if the official was not blowing the whistle.

Seahawks could have challenged that play, and if the play was overturned they would have benefitted from the bad call on that play because they would have credit for the catch and the Steelers would have been denied their opportunity to recover the fumble.

That was another bad call, but unlike all of the other crap calls, that was reviewable and the Seahawks failed to challenge it.

This non-call did not hurt the Steelers though. They got the ball on the 20 right after the punt on the following play. They actually gained field position.

htismaqe 02-06-2006 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13
Seattle had chances to win that game and didn't... they had an INT deep in Pit territory and missed 2 FG's. I thought the PI call was ticky tack though for sure, which has been par for the course in these playoffs. Probably one of the worst officiated playoff seasons I can remember. I don't think it was quite Super Bowl quality officiating out there, but what can ya do.

That INT happened AFTER Seattle had a completed pass (to the 1 yard line) called back for a BS holding call.

jynni 02-06-2006 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla
Roeth's TD was a TD. I don't understand complaining about that one.

Yeah - that's one I never saw as questionable. If you draw an imaginary line at the plane of the goal line upwards, the nose of the ball would cross it. The ball doesn't have to cross the entire line - the nose of the ball just has to touch that imaginary barrier.

64 Chief 02-06-2006 11:42 AM

I was rooting for the steelers. However there were 3 obviously bad calls favoring the steelers that greatly helped their win. That is my humble unbiased opinion. This is bad for the NFL.

BigMeatballDave 02-06-2006 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John
I just don't believe that. I was sitting there with a Seahawks buddy, and I was telling him, "Aw, come on man... Your guys have to bounce back from that stuff... And they kept bouncing back... And every time they did, they would get penalized on something stupid. And then the Steelers would do something that got totally overlooked, like call a timeout AFTER the clock had ticked zero, or horse collar tackle a rusher for no penalty.

I honestly believe in a fairly called game, Seattle would have won this game.

Imagine that. A donkey fan complaing about officiating...

RedThat 02-06-2006 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENDelt260
Who the fuck are you?

I don't know?

Read the name

RedThat 02-06-2006 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENDelt260
Get fucked.

I don't need to. Thanx anyway.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.