ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Cleveland ****ed us (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=162108)

Mr. Laz 04-28-2007 02:17 PM

Cleveland ****ed us
 
piece of shit mother ****ers

percysnow 04-28-2007 02:20 PM

i hate the chiefs. . .

Phobia 04-28-2007 02:21 PM

Somehow, it's George Bush's fault.

Messier 04-28-2007 02:21 PM

That deal was crazy. There was nothing we could do.

The Red Sea 04-28-2007 02:27 PM

Damn it Carl!!

Someone had to do it =P

Eleazar 04-28-2007 02:28 PM

Hah! morons! Little do they know, the Raiders already have him under contract.

Brock 04-28-2007 02:50 PM

Trading next year's first is always a fool's bet, IMO.

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 02:53 PM

I'd say the Browns saved us from ourselves actually. We actually got a guy at a position of need.

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
I'd say the Browns saved us from ourselves actually. We actually got a guy at a position of need.

lol how is QB not a position of need what if quinn becomes the next Joe montana,Quinn wasn't just another QB he was a position we should have built a franchise around.

Brock 04-28-2007 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
lol how is QB not a position of need what if quinn becomes the next Joe montana,Quinn wasn't just another QB he was a position we should have built a franchise around.

How many first round picks would you have given up for him?

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
How many first round picks would you have given up for him?

Only the one we used but if he dropped to 23 and we did not pick him in favor of a unproven QB in Croyle then carl is more stupid then I thought.

Mecca 04-28-2007 03:38 PM

I wish the Browns had given us a top 10 pick to move........

mikey23545 04-28-2007 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
Only the one we used but if he dropped to 23 and we did not pick him in favor of a unproven QB in Croyle then carl is more stupid then I thought.

Ahh, we should have gone for the proven college QB over Croyle....

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545
Ahh, we should have gone for the proven college QB over Croyle....

Croyle is a Project there is more chance for him to be a back QB then a NFL star.Brady on the other hand is a 50/50 he is the type of QB teams should be built around.

Brock 04-28-2007 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
Only the one we used but if he dropped to 23 and we did not pick him in favor of a unproven QB in Croyle then carl is more stupid then I thought.

I don't think you understand what Cleveland gave Dallas.

htismaqe 04-28-2007 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
Croyle is a Project there is more chance for him to be a back QB then a NFL star.Brady on the other hand is a 50/50 he is the type of QB teams should be built around.

Brady Quinn will start Day 1. Just like Tim Couch.

PinkFloyd 04-28-2007 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
lol how is QB not a position of need what if quinn becomes the next Joe montana,Quinn wasn't just another QB he was a position we should have built a franchise around.


The Chiefs will NEVER EVER develope a rookie QB as the "future".... We ALWAYS go after the "3-5 years of service left in the NFL" QB's....

Carl won't allow this franchise to ever pick in the top 15 or lower... He will always keep the team just good enough to make us contenders til the last game of the year --- but --- never good enough to win the whole damn thing....

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
I don't think you understand what Cleveland gave Dallas.

I do understand Cleveland Way overpayed for what they got but ppl on here are acting like we shouldn't care because we have croyle and QB wasn't a need.

Tribal Warfare 04-28-2007 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Brady Quinn will start Day 1. Just like Tim Couch.


Ryan Leaf, Akilli Smith, Rick Mire, and Tod Blackledge

PinkFloyd 04-28-2007 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Brady Quinn will start Day 1. Just like Tim Couch.


Quinn will start for the Browns.... Carl would never let Herm start him though on Day 1...

htismaqe 04-28-2007 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
I do understand Cleveland Way overpayed for what they got but ppl on here are acting like we shouldn't care because we have croyle and QB wasn't a need.

Croyle has a great chance to be successful in the NFL. He's been in the program for a year and added muscle (I've seen him).

Yes, we had a need at QB. Brady Quinn isn't the answer.

htismaqe 04-28-2007 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd
Quinn will start for the Browns.... Carl would never let Herm start him though on Day 1...

I think you missed my point.

Frosty 04-28-2007 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
lol how is QB not a position of need what if quinn becomes the next Joe montana,Quinn wasn't just another QB he was a position we should have built a franchise around.

Quinn is more likely the next Rick Mirer, than Montana, IMO. I sure would have liked the extra picks, though. :(

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd
The Chiefs will NEVER EVER develope a rookie QB as the "future".... We ALWAYS go after the "3-5 years of service left in the NFL" QB's....

Carl won't allow this franchise to ever pick in the top 15 or lower... He will always keep the team just good enough to make us contenders til the last game of the year --- but --- never good enough to win the whole damn thing....

The way most fans acted when quinn was gone just proves my point chiefs fans love there team to be mediocre at best.

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Croyle has a great chance to be successful in the NFL. He's been in the program for a year and added muscle (I've seen him).

Yes, we had a need at QB. Brady Quinn isn't the answer.

He was more of the answer then Croyle hence why he was worth a 1st round pick.

Tribal Warfare 04-28-2007 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Yes, we had a need at QB. Brady Quinn isn't the answer.


Quinn gets happy feet, and flustered when things don't go his way, hence the errant passes against bigtime competition. The guy doesn't have that composure you expect. He's a phsyical specimen, but games aren't played in the weight room

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
lol how is QB not a position of need

Huard... Croyle... Green... there's a starter or two in there... hence, not a position of need.

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
if he dropped to 23 and we did not pick him in favor of a unproven QB in Croyle then carl is more stupid then I thought.

How exactly is Quinn proven?

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
Huard... Croyle... Green... there's a starter or two in there... hence, not a position of need.

Green is done Huard is old and Croyle is more a ? mark then Quinn hence it was very much and still is a position of need.

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
He was more of the answer then Croyle hence why he was worth a 1st round pick.

And you know this how...?

You don't even know how to use punctuation.

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
How exactly is Quinn proven?

Croyle
YEAR CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT
2003 182 341 2303 53.4 6.75 86 16 13 27 117.97
2004 44 66 534 66.7 8.09 57 6 0 4 164.63
2005 202 339 2499 59.6 7.37 87 14 4 36 132.78

Quinn
2003 157 332 1831 47.3 5.52 85 9 15 13 93.52
2004 191 353 2586 54.1 7.33 54 17 10 25 125.87
2005 292 450 3919 64.9 8.71 80 32 7 20 158.40
2006 289 467 3426 61.9 7.34 62 37 7 31 146.65

And one isn't coming off a big injury.

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
And you know this how...?

You don't even know how to use punctuation.

Wow you cannot prove your point on how croyle is a better choice then quinn so now you move on to personal insults.

Frosty 04-28-2007 04:25 PM

It would have taken a 3rd and 5th to move up. There are too many holes on the team to give away half of the draft for one player, especially when there is lot of value in the mid rounds.

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
Green is done Huard is old and Croyle is more a ? mark then Quinn hence it was very much and still is a position of need.

You're reaching a lot. Other positions... WR, OL, DL, CB are much more immediate need positions for the Chiefs.

How exactly is Croyle more of a question mark than Quinn? How much did Huard's age keep him from being the second rated passer in the league last year? How do you know Green can't bounce back after last year now that he's had time to really recover from the concussion? Obviously the Dolphins think he can.

Do you base your comments on anything at all or do you just like to shout out a lot of bullshit?

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
Croyle
YEAR CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT
2003 182 341 2303 53.4 6.75 86 16 13 27 117.97
2004 44 66 534 66.7 8.09 57 6 0 4 164.63
2005 202 339 2499 59.6 7.37 87 14 4 36 132.78

Quinn
2003 157 332 1831 47.3 5.52 85 9 15 13 93.52
2004 191 353 2586 54.1 7.33 54 17 10 25 125.87
2005 292 450 3919 64.9 8.71 80 32 7 20 158.40
2006 289 467 3426 61.9 7.34 62 37 7 31 146.65

And one isn't coming off a big injury.

ROFL

College stats mean everthing when projecting a player to the NFL I guess. Ryan Leaf couldn't miss either.

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
Wow you cannot prove your point on how croyle is a better choice then quinn so now you move on to personal insults.

I never said Croyle was a better choice. He may be, he may not be. But if he doesn't work out we still have two other proven guys on our roster.

Pay attention.

DenverChief 04-28-2007 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
You're reaching a lot. Other positions... WR, OL, DL, CB are much more immediate need positions for the Chiefs.

How exactly is Croyle more of a question mark than Quinn? How much did Huard's age keep him from being the second rated passer in the league last year? How do you know Green can't bounce back after last year now that he's had time to really recover from the concussion? Obviously the Dolphins think he can.

Do you base your comments on anything at all or do you just like to shout out a lot of bullshit?


All this Quinn bickering and Croyle trashing is freakin HI-larious.....Croyle yea isn't proven neither is Quinn--neither one would survive behind our current Oline or without any more decent help at WR....we have no "proven" fullback....we need to get younger at CB....and we have 3 QB's on the roster, yea what a waste of a draft pick that would have been, *EDIT*not to mention Casey Printers and Omar Jacobs

PinkFloyd 04-28-2007 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
I think you missed my point.


I've been mowing too long today.... Sun has fried my brain...

DenverChief 04-28-2007 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
ROFL

College stats mean everthing when projecting a player to the NFL I guess. Ryan Leaf couldn't miss either.

LMAO Ryan Leaf LMAO

PinkFloyd 04-28-2007 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
I think you missed my point.


Opppppppppps.... I missed Tim Couch's name in there... I get it now...

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
You're reaching a lot. Other positions... WR, OL, DL, CB are much more immediate need positions for the Chiefs.

How exactly is Croyle more of a question mark than Quinn? How much did Huard's age keep him from being the second rated passer in the league last year? How do you know Green can't bounce back after last year now that he's had time to really recover from the concussion? Obviously the Dolphins think he can.

Do you base your comments on anything at all or do you just like to shout out a lot of bullshit?

1st Answer The stats and injury speak for themselves

2nd Answer When you have a old QB who is on his way out (Huard) a good team looks a for a Good replacement.

3rd if the Fins are so confident how come they only want to give up a 6th for green?

PinkFloyd 04-28-2007 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
The way most fans acted when quinn was gone just proves my point chiefs fans love there team to be mediocre at best.


I believe most fans would like to see us win the big one....


And I also believe most fans KNOW we will never win the big one also...

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
1st Answer The stats and injury speak for themselves

2nd Answer When you have a old QB who is on his way out (Huard) a good team looks a for a Good replacement.

3rd if the Fins are so confident how come they only want to give up a 6th for green?

The Chiefs don't agree with you.

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
ROFL

College stats mean everthing when projecting a player to the NFL I guess. Ryan Leaf couldn't miss either.

Did I say every QB with good college stats makes it in the NFL NO I said it gives him more of a chance then Croyle to make in the NFL.

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
I never said Croyle was a better choice. He may be, he may not be. But if he doesn't work out we still have two other proven guys on our roster.

Pay attention.

Green is anything but proven since his concussion.

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
The Chiefs don't agree with you.

The Chiefs didn't agree with me on junior siavii pick Either yet any one with common nfl sense knew it was a bad pick.

DenverChief 04-28-2007 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
Did I say every QB with good college stats makes it in the NFL NO I said it gives him more of a chance then Croyle to make in the NFL.


Brodie became only the second freshman quarterback since 1979 to pass for over 1,000 yards in a season. Croyle had 1,046 yards passing. Brodie played in 12 of the Tide's 13 games, earning starts in consecutive games against Arkansas and Georgia. He played a total of 327 snaps on the season. Brodie finished hitting 60-of-123 passing attempts for 1,046 yards and five TDs

Brodie became the first sophomore in Alabama history to pass for 2,000 or more yards in a season. He was the Tide's starting quarterback in 11 of the 13 games, missing starts against Georgia and Southern Miss with a shoulder injury. He closed the season hitting on 182 of 341 attempts with 16 touchdowns

Pros: Has a strong arm that has drawn raves from NFL scouts. Has improved in every aspect of play and has the physical talent to become an NFL starter. He shows great poise and courage in the pocket and has the fire to direct an offense. Has a good feel for pressure in the pocket with quick mobility to avoid rushers. Has a compact delivery that wastes little motion and allows him to get the ball off nicely under pressure. His decision-making ranks very high in this talented class and he sees the field well.

Numbers: The most prolific passer in Crimson Tide history. He is first in career completions (488), attempts (869), yards (6,382) and TDs (41). He has a .562 career passing percentage and owns the school record with 190 consecutive completions without an interception. At the Combine, he ran a 4.9 with a 30.5-inch vertical jump and an 8-foot, 8-inch broad jump. He threw the ball very well in the passing drills.

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
1st Answer The stats and injury speak for themselves

2nd Answer When you have a old QB who is on his way out (Huard) a good team looks a for a Good replacement.

3rd if the Fins are so confident how come they only want to give up a 6th for green?

1st... college stats only speak to a players potential in the NFL... nothing more... and players, especially young ones come back from injury all the time.

2nd... The Chiefs obviously feel Huard has a lot left... that's why they paid him. If he doesn't, they obviously feel good about Croyle too.

3rd... Of course the phins aren't going to offer much for a 37 year old QB... if they can get him for less why offer more? And the Chiefs are going to ask a lot for a guy who they (the phins) consider a starter. They'll probably meet in the middle. That's called negotiation.

You may be right about Quinn and Croyle. I'm not saying you won't be. Quinn MAY be great and Croyle MAY be a bust... but nobody knows yet. So far both are just unproven college players. You act as though you KNOW Quinn is going to be better than Croyle and you simply don't. That's just what you THINK.

StcChief 04-28-2007 04:49 PM

With Cleveland this guy will struggle at first.
Braylon Edwards may turn into a good FF pick.
KW Jr. may be more of a threat.

but it's still Cleveland

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
The Chiefs didn't agree with me on junior siavii pick Either yet any one with common nfl sense knew it was a bad pick.

Right... no other team has ever drafted a player that didn't work out before. Maybe you should get a job with the Chiefs draft team.

Amnorix 04-28-2007 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
Trading next year's first is always a fool's bet, IMO.

Not always. I'll start by noting that I think a team like the Browns, where teh pick could easily be in the top 10, should almot never be traded away. BUT, I think, The Browns current leadership is trying desperately to save their jobs.

But other than that, picks and players are just commodities. Next year's pick is an unknown commodity, to a degree, because the position isn't determined, but teams already have a good sense of whether the draft is a strong or weak one, and how the player you intend to get now (a known commodity) compares to what is likely to be available next year, depending on the pick.

As a simple example, if a player is on the board in the early 2nd round that a team like the Pats, Chargers, Bears or Colts (all likely 10+ game winners with a pick likely in the bottom 1/3rd of next years draft) rate as a "first round value", then it would make sense to me for a team like that to trade a 1st next year to get that guy.

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
Right... no other team has ever drafted a player that didn't work out before. Maybe you should get a job with the Chiefs draft team.

Come on man siavii is a pretty famous shitty pick most draft boards had him going in the 4th-6th rounds.

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
Come on man siavii is a pretty famous shitty pick most draft boards had him going in the 4th-6th rounds.

Yes he was shitty. Bowe shouldn't be as shitty.

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
1st... college stats only speak to a players potential in the NFL... nothing more... and players, especially young ones come back from injury all the time.

2nd... The Chiefs obviously feel Huard has a lot left... that's why they paid him. If he doesn't, they obviously feel good about Croyle too.

http://journorock.blogspot.com/2007/...chiefs-in.html

Huard is nothing more then a really good backup who is here why we wait and hope that croyle turns in to something.

3rd... Of course the phins aren't going to offer much for a 37 year old QB... if they can get him for less why offer more? And the Chiefs are going to ask a lot for a guy who they (the phins) consider a starter. They'll probably meet in the middle. That's called negotiation.

No one is going to offer much to a 37 year old who played like that after a head concussion.

You may be right about Quinn and Croyle. I'm not saying you won't be. Quinn MAY be great and Croyle MAY be a bust... but nobody knows yet. So far both are just unproven college players. You act as though you KNOW Quinn is going to be better than Croyle and you simply don't. That's just what you THINK. And any other nfl analyst


Brock 04-28-2007 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
I do understand Cleveland Way overpayed for what they got but ppl on here are acting like we shouldn't care because we have croyle and QB wasn't a need.

I can't speak for anybody else, but the reason I don't care is because we have needs everywhere, and there is no way I would have given up what Cleveland did. So basically, the whole thing is irrelevant.

Mr. Laz 04-28-2007 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arc
Quinn is more likely the next Rick Mirer, than Montana, IMO. I sure would have liked the extra picks, though. :(

exactly ...... take Quinn or take the extra picks IF cleveland traded with us.

we were on the brink of SOMETHING good and ended up with sly morris.

Mr. Laz 04-28-2007 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
I can't speak for anybody else, but the reason I don't care is because we have needs everywhere, and there is no way I would have given up what Cleveland did. So basically, the whole thing is irrelevant.

how can the whole thing be irrelevant?


several things could of happen that would of given us a chance with ending up with something extra .... something above and beyond.


1. Dallas takes Quinn (bad, but that really wasn't happening imo)

2. Dallas passes on Quinn and we take him ..... giving us a tremendous value pick and the best QB prospect we've had .... pfft...... ever.

3. Dallas passes on Quinn and Cleveland trades with us ... giving us an extra 2nd round pick this year and an extra 1st round pick next year. Have we ever had two 1st round picks? i don't think so.


instead we end up with the #23 pick of the draft .... meh

htismaqe 04-28-2007 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
exactly ...... take Quinn or take the extra picks IF cleveland traded with us.

we were on the brink of SOMETHING good and ended up with sly morris.

ROFL

Sly Morris played 1-AA ball.

Bowe played in the *SEC*.

Don't be dumb.

Brock 04-28-2007 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
how can the whole thing be irrelevant?


several things could of happen that would of given us a chance with ending up with something extra .... something above and beyond.


1. Dallas takes Quinn (bad, but that really wasn't happening imo)

2. Dallas passes on Quinn and we take him ..... giving us a tremendous value pick and the best QB prospect we've had .... pfft...... ever.

3. Dallas passes on Quinn and Cleveland trades with us ... giving us an extra 2nd round pick this year and an extra 1st round pick next year. Have we ever had two 1st round picks? i don't think so.


instead we end up with the #23 pick of the draft .... meh

It's irrelevant to me because none of those things happened.

htismaqe 04-28-2007 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
how can the whole thing be irrelevant?


several things could of happen that would of given us a chance with ending up with something extra .... something above and beyond.


1. Dallas takes Quinn (bad, but that really wasn't happening imo)

2. Dallas passes on Quinn and we take him ..... giving us a tremendous value pick and the best QB prospect we've had .... pfft...... ever.

3. Dallas passes on Quinn and Cleveland trades with us ... giving us an extra 2nd round pick this year and an extra 1st round pick next year. Have we ever had two 1st round picks? i don't think so.


instead we end up with the #23 pick of the draft .... meh

I was fishing and listening to Fox radio.

Dallas told EVERYBODY right before their pick that they were taking Quinn.

Dallas had the cards.

There's not one thing here to blame the Chiefs for.

Mr. Laz 04-28-2007 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
It's irrelevant to me because none of those things happened.

fantastic, Forrest.

Mr. Laz 04-28-2007 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
I was fishing and listening to Fox radio.

Dallas told EVERYBODY right before their pick that they were taking Quinn.

Dallas had the cards.

There's not one thing here to blame the Chiefs for.

doesn't the title of the thread say "cleveland ****ed us"

show me where i blamed the chiefs?

htismaqe 04-28-2007 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
doesn't the title of the thread say "cleveland ****ed us"

show me where i blamed the chiefs?

Give me a break. You've dedicated two whole thread to it.

Mr. Laz 04-28-2007 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Give me a break. You've dedicated two whole thread to it.

bullchit .... you assumed that's what i'm saying.

because ... well ... that's just what you do.


i'm pissed off at cleveland and the situation in general ... even your peanut brain can comprehend that.

jaxchiefsclub 04-28-2007 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
piece of shit mother ****ers

And they trade to get in front of us again. Wonder what they gave Dallas this time.

irishjayhawk 04-28-2007 06:28 PM

Twice.

Tribal Warfare 04-28-2007 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishjayhawk
Twice.


fuck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I wanted Wright

bdeg 04-28-2007 06:31 PM

F*** the Browns.

Are they just throwing away their draft to try to mess up ours?

Cowboys are getting some great deals.

htismaqe 04-28-2007 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
bullchit .... you assumed that's what i'm saying.

because ... well ... that's just what you do.


i'm pissed off at cleveland and the situation in general ... even your peanut brain can comprehend that.

You've spent 7 years blaming the Chiefs for stuff like this. You're ranting and raving about something that doesn't affect our team in the slightest. Umm, yeah.

rtmike 04-28-2007 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare
fuck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I wanted Wright

Yeah, me too. The talking mouths on ESPN are sure beating him up and knocking Cleveland for taking him.

htismaqe 04-28-2007 06:33 PM

We wouldn't have taken Wright anyway.

Mr. Laz 04-28-2007 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaxchiefsclub
And they trade to get in front of us again. Wonder what they gave Dallas this time.

be careful ..... being mad at cleveland = blaming the chiefs


apparently

htismaqe 04-28-2007 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rtmike
Yeah, me too. The talking mouths on ESPN are sure beating him up and knocking Cleveland for taking him.

So are the guys on the NFL network. They liked our pick, though.

htismaqe 04-28-2007 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
be careful ..... being mad at cleveland = blaming the chiefs


apparently

Are you trying to suggest you don't have a notorius history for doing it?

BigRock 04-28-2007 06:56 PM

If the Browns hadn't traded up, Dallas probably would have taken Wright. NFL Network said Dallas liked him in the 1st, but passed because of character concerns.

Tribal Warfare 04-28-2007 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
We wouldn't have taken Wright anyway.



I disagree

htismaqe 04-28-2007 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare
I disagree

I think McBride was the target all along...his profile fits exactly what Herm wants, both in ability and attitude.

Given what they're going through with Allen, I don't think they'll touch a guy like Wright with a 10-foot pole.

htismaqe 04-28-2007 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock
If the Browns hadn't traded up, Dallas probably would have taken Wright. NFL Network said Dallas liked him in the 1st, but passed because of character concerns.

Somebody was going to trade up. Dallas was telling everyone they were taking Quinn.

BigRock 04-28-2007 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Somebody was going to trade up. Dallas was telling everyone they were taking Quinn.

I meant in the 2nd round. If the Browns hadn't moved up to grab Wright, Dallas probably would have taken him themselves. So Cleveland didn't really screw us on that one.

Frazod 04-28-2007 07:31 PM

Well, assuming those fucks don't start trading away picks from 2015, we should be safe from their meddling one who sucks the penisy for the remainder of the draft. But certainly the damage is done.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.