ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   If Clark has an ounce of sense... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=175317)

Hammock Parties 11-25-2007 04:54 PM

If Clark has an ounce of sense...
 
He'll dump Herm and Carl as soon as the season is over and anoint this guy as our new head coach.

http://i2.tinypic.com/72jlzc9.jpg

Jason Garrett is young (41), offensive-minded, smart as a whip, and is going to be a hot commodity this offseason. The Cowboys are sure to lose him, and should probably dump that fat turd Wade Phillips and promote Garrett.

LOOK AT THIS PSYCHOTIC STARE.

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/612/2600eh6.jpg

Thig Lyfe 11-25-2007 04:55 PM

Yikes.

Looks like he'll coach to win, at least.

FringeNC 11-25-2007 04:56 PM

That's my pick for our next head coach.

Mecca 11-25-2007 04:56 PM

Well Garrett is aggressive.....

Something tells me Clark will be just like his dad and Carl and Herm will be back, with no pressure at all.

Mr. Arrowhead 11-25-2007 04:57 PM

not gonna happen, Herm will be here for at least another season

BigMeatballDave 11-25-2007 05:10 PM

I'm on board.

JimNasium 11-25-2007 05:10 PM

I'd rather see Cowher.

Mecca 11-25-2007 05:11 PM

I doubt Cowher is coming back, especially to coach our team when he could take ready made San Diego.

banyon 11-25-2007 05:12 PM

The guy has definitely had a chance over the years to watch a lot of football games holdin that clipboard.

007 11-25-2007 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimNasium
I'd rather see Cowher.

As much as I like Cowher, I really want to see completely new blood for this franchise.

Hammock Parties 11-25-2007 05:14 PM

Cowher is just a white Herm. No thanks.

smittysbar 11-25-2007 05:15 PM

I don't give a shit, as long as Herm goes. But he will be here for 2 more seasons.

JimNasium 11-25-2007 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE
Cowher is just a white Herm. No thanks.

Cowher has been to two Super Bowls and won one. That's better than Marty and better than Herm will ever be.

gblowfish 11-25-2007 06:09 PM

You think our opponents would try to beat Garrett like a red headed stepchild?...

I apologize.

BigMeatballDave 11-25-2007 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE
Cowher is just a white Herm. No thanks.

LMAO WTF?

TEX 11-25-2007 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca
I doubt Cowher is coming back, especially to coach our team when he could take ready made San Diego.

Carolina. He's got a ranch there. His wife and Family love it there.

DomerNKC 11-25-2007 06:18 PM

Another Lane Kiffin???? No thanks.

B_Ambuehl 11-25-2007 07:02 PM

Gochiefs/Goatse.....I thought you loved Herm?

88TG88 11-25-2007 07:05 PM

Once Carl leaves all the pieces will fall into place.

Sully 11-25-2007 07:25 PM

LOL.

I hired him in Madden!!1

LOL

Sure-Oz 11-25-2007 07:31 PM

I thought you liked Herm, what happend?

Hydrae 11-25-2007 07:35 PM

Isn't this Garrett's first year as OC in Dallas? He has done great but I don't know that that will translate into being a HC.

Stinger 11-25-2007 07:36 PM

You all relize that Garrett was brought in to take over the reigns in Dallas right? Jerry Jones has even said as much. No way does Dallas let their golden child get away.

BigRedChief 11-25-2007 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE
He'll dump Herm and Carl as soon as the season is over and anoint this guy as our new head coach.

http://i2.tinypic.com/72jlzc9.jpg

Jason Garrett is young (41), offensive-minded, smart as a whip, and is going to be a hot commodity this offseason. The Cowboys are sure to lose him, and should probably dump that fat turd Wade Phillips and promote Garrett.

LOOK AT THIS PSYCHOTIC STARE.

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/612/2600eh6.jpg

Nada friggin chance no matter what happens in Big D. He's Jerry's hand picked coach. He ain't going nowhere.

Manila-Chief 11-25-2007 08:22 PM

Go Chiefs (notice I respectfully use your correct username) ... we've had our differences but I fully agree with you on this one. I think there is less than a 5% chance it will happen but I would be delighted. Garrett may fail as a HC but I for one am willing to give a young guy the chance. Can't be any worse than what we've had for the last 30+ years.

For all you guys saying Jerry Jones will never let it happen ... I may be wrong but if he is offered a HC position I think Jones can't do a lot about it unless he wants to make him their HC coach and I doubt he will replace Phillips after the year they are having. Now I think Phillips is living off of the previous coaches talent/ground work and I will not be surprised if Dallas goes down next year.

But, I'd sure like to have Garrett. If he is not available then I'm good with Cowher ... only coz he won a SB.

But, the key is ... who will be GM? Without a quality GM we are going no where!!!

Manila-Chief 11-25-2007 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DomerNKC
Another Lane Kiffin???? No thanks.

How do you know Kiffin will not succeed? He beat us at Arrowhead!!! He is having to turn the team around ... thus, he no one knows how he will end up. At least Oakland has a chance Kiffin will grow a wining team. IMHO with Herm as our coach we have less than not a chance at all. Any coach that is afraid to call plays that gives a team the chance to win has no chance at all.

Now I like the guy. He is a great person ... has the correct character ... has right priorities ... but a very poor coach.

DomerNKC 11-25-2007 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manila-Chief
How do you know Kiffin will not succeed? He beat us at Arrowhead!!! He is having to turn the team around ... thus, he no one knows how he will end up. At least Oakland has a chance Kiffin will grow a wining team. IMHO with Herm as our coach we have less than not a chance at all. Any coach that is afraid to call plays that gives a team the chance to win has no chance at all.

Now I like the guy. He is a great person ... has the correct character ... has right priorities ... but a very poor coach.

Correction, he didn't beat us at arrowhead...herm did. There are already reports that he has lost control of that team. Sapp has already said that there is no discipline. 3wins? Clear a spot in Canton for Montys son. Is he better than Herm? Sure, who isn't? Should he be a Head Coach in the NFL? No. There are several coaches much more qualified. Is garrett one of them? Not yet.

MadMax 11-25-2007 09:02 PM

Clark is a competetive lil rich kid, is what I got from the article... :)

Manila-Chief 11-25-2007 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DomerNKC
Correction, he didn't beat us at arrowhead...herm did. There are already reports that he has lost control of that team. Sapp has already said that there is no discipline. 3wins? Clear a spot in Canton for Montys son. Is he better than Herm? Sure, who isn't? Should he be a Head Coach in the NFL? No. There are several coaches much more qualified. Is garrett one of them? Not yet.

Now, where did I write that I expect him to become a HOF member? I, only, said that he has a chance.

It seems you are just trying to argue. You can phrase it any way you wish but at least his team won in KC today and I think he had just a little to do with managing the win. I've read that he is having to change the atmosphere/attitude on the team and that it is taking time to get the job done. Will he be successful? I'm not saying he will ... just that he still has a chance to be successful.

I fully agree with you that Herm was the main reason we lost today. I think you agree with this ... I think we have less than 0 chance for Herm to take us to a SB.

I'm still amazed that Go Chiefs is calling for Herm's firing.

Frankie 11-25-2007 09:24 PM

I'd probably promote Herm to GM (just wanna see if those drafts are his) and maybe go after Garret for HC. Realistically though, the Cowboys put him in place before hiring their HC. He will be the next Cowboys HC, I'm afraid.

Hoover 11-25-2007 09:32 PM

We need to stick with Herm.

While I agree that he isn't the best manager of the game, I like him as a talent evalulator, and he seems to always have his team ready to play.

I don't think its a good thing to constantly be changing coaching staffs in hopes to strike lightning. I like what I see on defense and I don't want to see us take a step back on that side of the ball. We need some help on offense, but we struck gold with Bowe and a lot of talent in the skill positions. we ust need some linemen.

Give it time folks, hell you've made it this long whats another year. Plus I'd rather watch a good defensive team who is in every game then the crap DV was selling.

DomerNKC 11-25-2007 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manila-Chief
Now, where did I write that I expect him to become a HOF member? I, only, said that he has a chance.

It seems you are just trying to argue. You can phrase it any way you wish but at least his team won in KC today and I think he had just a little to do with managing the win. I've read that he is having to change the atmosphere/attitude on the team and that it is taking time to get the job done. Will he be successful? I'm not saying he will ... just that he still has a chance to be successful.

I fully agree with you that Herm was the main reason we lost today. I think you agree with this ... I think we have less than 0 chance for Herm to take us to a SB.

I'm still amazed that Go Chiefs is calling for Herm's firing.

How do I know Kiffin will not succeed? 1) No Head Coaching experience. none. Not High School, Not College, and not Pro. Could someone succeed? sure. The odds are slimmer than Go chiefs being elected president though.
2) Al Davis. I do agree with you that there is less than 0 chance of Herm taking us to a Super Bowl. The odds are the same that this team is as good as it will get under Herm.

Hammock Parties 11-25-2007 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover
We need to stick with Herm.

While I agree that he isn't the best manager of the game, I like him as a talent evalulator, and he seems to always have his team ready to play.

I don't think its a good thing to constantly be changing coaching staffs in hopes to strike lightning. I like what I see on defense and I don't want to see us take a step back on that side of the ball. We need some help on offense, but we struck gold with Bowe and a lot of talent in the skill positions. we ust need some linemen.

Give it time folks, hell you've made it this long whats another year. Plus I'd rather watch a good defensive team who is in every game then the crap DV was selling.

This is just more of the same crap, man. It's Carl hiring one of his under qualified buddies and ignoring everyone else. Then he forces Solari on him, and probably Gunther, who isn't that great, too. This organization is stale. We need an enema so bad it hurts. The front office is full of tenured fuddie duddies.

FIRE EVERYONE. GUT THE ORGANIZATION. These ****ers aren't winning SHIT. Under Herm we will CONSTANTLY start out slow and we'll constantly experience bullshit like what happened yesterday.

ARROWHEAD IS DYING. Do something before it's DEAD.

:deevee: :deevee: :deevee:

DomerNKC 11-25-2007 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover
We need to stick with Herm.

While I agree that he isn't the best manager of the game, I like him as a talent evalulator, and he seems to always have his team ready to play.

I don't think its a good thing to constantly be changing coaching staffs in hopes to strike lightning. I like what I see on defense and I don't want to see us take a step back on that side of the ball. We need some help on offense, but we struck gold with Bowe and a lot of talent in the skill positions. we ust need some linemen.

Give it time folks, hell you've made it this long whats another year. Plus I'd rather watch a good defensive team who is in every game then the crap DV was selling.

I absolutely agree with you. He is a good pro personnel man. He is in the wrong job. His Career path should lead to the front office. He is not a head coach. Managing the Game is a head coaches job. Personnel evaluating and procurement is for the front office.

blueballs 11-25-2007 09:53 PM

randon youtube link post
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEW8_KVhDFE

Kylo Ren 11-25-2007 10:00 PM

I'd be for hiring Kermit and firing Herm.

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/SHOWBIZ/...ory.kermit.jpg

Manila-Chief 11-25-2007 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover
We need to stick with Herm.

While I agree that he isn't the best manager of the game, I like him as a talent evalulator, and he seems to always have his team ready to play.

I don't think its a good thing to constantly be changing coaching staffs in hopes to strike lightning. I like what I see on defense and I don't want to see us take a step back on that side of the ball. We need some help on offense, but we struck gold with Bowe and a lot of talent in the skill positions. we ust need some linemen.

Give it time folks, hell you've made it this long whats another year. Plus I'd rather watch a good defensive team who is in every game then the crap DV was selling.

I don't understand ... why would we want to stick with a coach who "... isn't the best manager of the game...." Talent does a team no good if the coach can't/won't win with it!!!

Why give him one more year? We will be one year longer rebuilding the team. But, you'll get your wish. Not only will Herm have one more year he'll have at least 3.

I guess I will need to find a hobby and forget about following this team. If enough of us do that maybe then Clark will wake up.

Kylo Ren 11-25-2007 10:05 PM

Seriously, I'd be for:
1. Cowher
2. Schottenheimer
3. Jarrett
4. Santa Claus
5. Easter Bunny
6. Anyone with a pulse

FIRE Herm!

Hoover 11-25-2007 10:08 PM

What I don't understand is that many of you have said that you want to rebuild, but when we actually start the process you bitch, cry and demand the HC to be fired.

I'm willing to rebuild, thats why I'm thrilled to see Croyle and Smith on the field and starting.

chiefbowe82 11-25-2007 10:15 PM

most people said they would love to rebuild take a bad record get a high draft pick, and get ready for the 2010 season, now we start losing games and all of a sudden herm needs to be fired :rolleyes:

L.A. Chieffan 11-25-2007 10:18 PM

HERM FOREVER!!! WE WANT HERM! WE WANT HERM!

Chiefnj2 11-25-2007 10:18 PM

Goatsex,

Of all the games to turn on Herm, why this one?

Hammock Parties 11-25-2007 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2
Goatsex,

Of all the games to turn on Herm, why this one?

I'll explain everything in great detail when I write tomorrow.

Stinger 11-25-2007 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover
What I don't understand is that many of you have said that you want to rebuild, but when we actually start the process you bitch, cry and demand the HC to be fired.

I'm willing to rebuild, thats why I'm thrilled to see Croyle and Smith on the field and starting.

:clap:

I have been wondering this for a few weeks. So many at the beginning of the season said they could care less of what happened during the season as long as some of the new players got PT and we could see what we got. Well now we are playing those young players and losing but in the true CP way we are going to bitch and complain about something. :shake:

cdcox 11-25-2007 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover
What I don't understand is that many of you have said that you want to rebuild, but when we actually start the process you bitch, cry and demand the HC to be fired.

I'm willing to rebuild, thats why I'm thrilled to see Croyle and Smith on the field and starting.

If they are rebuilding, be honest about it. Donnie Edwards has been a great addition to the defense this year, but bringing him in at this stage of his career has zero to do with rebuilding. If you were truly rebuilding, you wouldn't sign LJ to a long term deal, because a rebuilding project is going to extend beyiond his productive years.

The other thing is if you are going to build something, build something worth building. A perennial playoff contender is not worth building. Build a dynasty. Your goal should be to build the best Offensive Unit and the Best Defensive Unit in the NFL. Your goal should be to shut every team out and to score a TD on ever possession.

Chiefnj2 11-25-2007 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover
What I don't understand is that many of you have said that you want to rebuild, but when we actually start the process you bitch, cry and demand the HC to be fired.

I'm willing to rebuild, thats why I'm thrilled to see Croyle and Smith on the field and starting.

I'm happy rebuilding. I just wish Herm wouldn't touch or influence the offensive gameplan.

cdcox 11-25-2007 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stinger
:clap:

I have been wondering this for a few weeks. So many at the beginning of the season said they could care less of what happened during the season as long as some of the new players got PT and we could see what we got. Well now we are playing those young players and losing but in the true CP way we are going to bitch and complain about something. :shake:

So we can't want Croyle to play AND want Herm to at least attempt to get a first down against Indy AND want him to manage his time outs better against Oakland. The things people are complaining about are separate issues and are not mutually exclusive. You don't have the same people complaining about not play Croyle one week and calling him a bust the next.

Hoover 11-25-2007 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox
If they are rebuilding, be honest about it. Donnie Edwards has been a great addition to the defense this year, but bringing him in at this stage of his career has zero to do with rebuilding. If you were truly rebuilding, you wouldn't sign LJ to a long term deal, because a rebuilding project is going to extend beyiond his productive years.

The other thing is if you are going to build something, build something worth building. A perennial playoff contender is not worth building. Build a dynasty. Your goal should be to build the best Offensive Unit and the Best Defensive Unit in the NFL. Your goal should be to shut every team out and to score a TD on ever possession.

rebuilding doesn't take that long in the NFL with free agency and solid drafts.

I think LJ has plenty of gas in the take as he has only been the starter for 2 years. We just need to focus him, he needs to want a championship.

I don't have a problem with bringing in a player like Edwards. Sure he is on the downside, but not every position can be staffed with a young promising player.

Mecca 11-25-2007 10:41 PM

LJ is going to be completely done by 09....he's already showing signs. If anyone thinks he'll be anymore than a marginally productive Eddie George later years type by then, they are asking a ton.

And once again Cdcox is right on the money....the Chiefs should but giant band aids on their helmets it's the whole mantra of this organizations thought of how to build a team.

cdcox 11-25-2007 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover
rebuilding doesn't take that long in the NFL with free agency and solid drafts.

I think LJ has plenty of gas in the take as he has only been the starter for 2 years. We just need to focus him, he needs to want a championship.

I don't have a problem with bringing in a player like Edwards. Sure he is on the downside, but not every position can be staffed with a young promising player.

Realistically, we're still going to have to turn over half our starting line up in order to compete for a SB, when you consider the ages of some of our starters. You can't do that in a year or two. Not to mention that the QB situation will take a few years to resolve/develop.

RedThat 11-25-2007 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox
Realistically, we're still going to have to turn over half our starting line up in order to compete for a SB, when you consider the ages of some of our starters. You can't do that in a year or two. Not to mention that the QB situation will take a few years to resolve/develop.

Realistically, the first thing we have to do is clean up the FO first, and put together a competent FO before you can put together a competent roster.

cdcox 11-25-2007 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull
Realistically, the first thing we have to do is clean up the FO first, and put together a competent FO before you can put together a competent roster.

That would be my preference.

Mecca 11-25-2007 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox
Realistically, we're still going to have to turn over half our starting line up in order to compete for a SB, when you consider the ages of some of our starters. You can't do that in a year or two. Not to mention that the QB situation will take a few years to resolve/develop.

Considering we are talking good starters, and not doing things like playing Jeff Webb.

Hammock Parties 11-25-2007 10:50 PM

Talent doesn't matter. Our head coach is Herm Edwards.

Mecca 11-25-2007 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox
That would be my preference.

If Clark is like his dad I'll probably die before this franchise wins anything.

kcchiefsus 11-25-2007 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stinger
You all relize that Garrett was brought in to take over the reigns in Dallas right? Jerry Jones has even said as much. No way does Dallas let their golden child get away.

If the Chiefs were willing to pay him enough then there is no way they can stop us. Besides, with Dallas doing as well as they are do you think they are going to mess with a winning formula? Barring a late season collapse I think the Cowboys would be wise to stick with Phillips. No team goes to the super bowl or even deep into the playoffs and then turns around and fires their head coach.

cdcox 11-25-2007 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca
If Clark is like his dad I'll probably die before this franchise wins anything.

In his AFL days, Lamar had a ton of fire in his belly. The Chiefs were one of the most aggressive teams in the draft wars against the NFL. Hunt wanted to beat the NFL baaaaad. Then once the NFL was forced to take the AFL and once he one his SB, his competitive fire seemed to go out.

If Clark is like his dad, he'll want to make his own bones in the NFL. I'm still holding out hope that things will change in the next few years.

Mecca 11-25-2007 10:59 PM

I wonder if people around here will then say bad things about him. I'm not old enough to remember any old times but all through my life time all I've known of Lamar Hunt is an old man that didn't seem to care that much, everyone calls him classy.

I see Jerry Jones win bowls people call him a douche, but to me at least he cares and wants to win.

RedThat 11-25-2007 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover
We need to stick with Herm.

While I agree that he isn't the best manager of the game, I like him as a talent evalulator, and he seems to always have his team ready to play.

I don't think its a good thing to constantly be changing coaching staffs in hopes to strike lightning. I like what I see on defense and I don't want to see us take a step back on that side of the ball. We need some help on offense, but we struck gold with Bowe and a lot of talent in the skill positions. we ust need some linemen.

Give it time folks, hell you've made it this long whats another year. Plus I'd rather watch a good defensive team who is in every game then the crap DV was selling.

Really? You think Herm has his team ready to play? Are you kidding me?

I haven't seen a coach since I started watching the Chiefs do such a poor job at getting his team prepared.

I don't like what I see on defense. I think this is a decent defense, but people praise it as if it is the best thing they've seen? this defense is built to just "not give up the big play"...Yeah there are flashes of talent, but it's clear it can get exposed on a given day.

The Chiefs suck at stopping the run. Inconsistent there, and haven't fixed that aspect of their D. That's the first thing you need to work on when building a defense.

I said it once, and I'll say it again, the Chiefs will never have a good offense as long as Herm is the coach. You know why? Because he handcuffs offenses! It's that simple. He doesn't believe in scoring points. His attitude and philosophy is what is strangleholding this team.

I have no faith in the guy. NONE! If people say he is a talent evaluator, then he should just go where he belongs, be a scout, and stay away from coaching.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-25-2007 11:00 PM

I'd be ok with giving Mike Singletary a shot.

kcchiefsus 11-25-2007 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca
LJ is going to be completely done by 09....he's already showing signs. If anyone thinks he'll be anymore than a marginally productive Eddie George later years type by then, they are asking a ton.

And once again Cdcox is right on the money....the Chiefs should but giant band aids on their helmets it's the whole mantra of this organizations thought of how to build a team.

Give me a break. You act like his injury is due to overuse. Sorry, any runningback is going to potentially break his foot or ankle if it gets caught under a linebacker the way LJ's did.

I see no reason at all to believe he is anywhere close to done. Give him a damn line and he is back to 1,500 yard seasons. LJ and Kolby Smith could potentially be a great 1-2 punch. LJ is the tough north-south runner and Kolby Smith is the shifty one who can make runs to the outside.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-25-2007 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox
In his AFL days, Lamar had a ton of fire in his belly. The Chiefs were one of the most aggressive teams in the draft wars against the NFL. Hunt wanted to beat the NFL baaaaad. Then once the NFL was forced to take the AFL and once he one his SB, his competitive fire seemed to go out.

If Clark is like his dad, he'll want to make his own bones in the NFL. I'm still holding out hope that things will change in the next few years.

How much do you think is a result of the Hunt family almost going tits up over trying to corner the silver market?

Stinger 11-25-2007 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsus
No team goes ..... even deep into the playoffs and then turns around and fires their head coach.

Tell that to Marty Schottenhiemer

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsus
If the Chiefs were willing to pay him enough then there is no way they can stop us. Besides, with Dallas doing as well as they are do you think they are going to mess with a winning formula? Barring a late season collapse I think the Cowboys would be wise to stick with Phillips.

Do you reallyl think Carl and the Hunts are going to win a bidding war with Jerry Jones? I said this in another post on another thread:
... if the Chiefs offer Garrett a contract to be the Head Coach he will inherit all of their offensive struggles next year. Or he can be the OC for Dallas one more year and then take over that squad with a new stadium, a high paying GM, and one of the most recongnized franchises in the NFL. Ummm as much as I love the Chiefs I see no upside for Garrett here. Remember just because someone offers a job does not mean they will take it.

Mecca 11-25-2007 11:03 PM

If you don't acknowledge history you are doomed to repeat it. Heavy workload backs break down....big backs like him also break down....that's 2 strikes right away...

This organization gave RB's big contracts back to back, they didn't learn and they will pay for it.

cdcox 11-25-2007 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca
I wonder if people around here will then say bad things about him. I'm not old enough to remember any old times but all through my life time all I've known of Lamar Hunt is an old man that didn't seem to care that much, everyone calls him classy.

I see Jerry Jones win bowls people call him a douche, but to me at least he cares and wants to win.

If you want to get a glimpse of the young Lamar, read the book America's Game by Michael MacCambridge.

RedThat 11-25-2007 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca
I wonder if people around here will then say bad things about him. I'm not old enough to remember any old times but all through my life time all I've known of Lamar Hunt is an old man that didn't seem to care that much, everyone calls him classy.

I see Jerry Jones win bowls people call him a douche, but to me at least he cares and wants to win.

I once made a post on this board, saying that the Chiefs need a change in mentality when it comes to ownership. Just a different attitude you know?

that fireyness, competitiveness! I don't see that in Lamar. I once said that on here, that Lamar is responsible for the failures of this franchise, that the Chiefs needed a change in ownership and needed a change in attitude, and I got bashed.

Stinger 11-25-2007 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
I'd be ok with giving Mike Singletary a shot.

If the Herm experiment does not pan out after year three I think this would be a very good idea.

cdcox 11-25-2007 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
How much do you think is a result of the Hunt family almost going tits up over trying to corner the silver market?

I think it was more his brothers than Lamar that were in on that scheme. I think it has more to do with that once Lamar had slaid the NFL dragon, that he no longer had a challenge that interested him. After that, it seems he left the running of the franchise more to others and concentrated on league issues.

Mecca 11-25-2007 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull
I once made a post on this board, saying that the Chiefs need a change in mentality when it comes to ownership. Just a different attitude you know?

that fireyness, competitiveness! I don't see that in Lamar. I once said that on here, that Lamar is responsible for the failures of this franchise, that the Chiefs needed a change in ownership and needed a change in attitude, and I got bashed.

I know exactly where you are coming from, the whole Chiefs attitude comes from/came from the top down. If Lamar had really been passionate about winning Peterson would have been gone years ago. We can blame Peterson all we want Lamar was the one keeping him there so it was good enough for him.

RedThat 11-25-2007 11:10 PM

i know this may sound stupid, but does anyone really care anymore?

I mean about this season. I hope it goes into the tank, just tank it. Lose every frikkn game. Get a top 3 pick.

Hey the Chiefs go 4-12, hopefully that'll lose fanbase, and influence ownership to make changes.

I know rooting to lose is bad. But Im looking at the potential bright sides.

I want a new FO, a new coaching staff and possibly a potential superstar in the draft.

RedThat 11-25-2007 11:11 PM

Lets make it clear this franchise needs a shakeup.

greg63 11-25-2007 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca
Well Garrett is aggressive.....

Something tells me Clark will be just like his dad and Carl and Herm will be back, with no pressure at all.

...Unfortunately!

On a personal note: Herm's coaching stupidity knows no limits.

Mecca 11-25-2007 11:13 PM

I agree with you, now I'm sure someone will say we are bad fans for that view. That how dare we want to lose for better picks.....

Beer Bacon can show up and tell us we don't want top 5 picks because they are to expensive, yes he really said that.

ChiefsCountry 11-25-2007 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox
In his AFL days, Lamar had a ton of fire in his belly. The Chiefs were one of the most aggressive teams in the draft wars against the NFL. Hunt wanted to beat the NFL baaaaad. Then once the NFL was forced to take the AFL and once he one his SB, his competitive fire seemed to go out.

If Clark is like his dad, he'll want to make his own bones in the NFL. I'm still holding out hope that things will change in the next few years.

Also Lamar was one of the richest owners in the AFL, that made a big difference as well. Him, Bud Adams, and the Jets owner had the dollars at that time.

RedThat 11-25-2007 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca
I know exactly where you are coming from, the whole Chiefs attitude comes from/came from the top down. If Lamar had really been passionate about winning Peterson would have been gone years ago. We can blame Peterson all we want Lamar was the one keeping him there so it was good enough for him.

And honestly, and I think there are very few organizations that would keep an underachieving GM?

It's been almost 20 years that Peterson is here? Unbelievable.

I think they care about selling tickets. peterson is good enough for building 8-8 teams. But now I think he is starting to wear thin even doing that? Peterson is Good enough to make a few moves to peak the fans interest. I've seen that happen over and over from time to time.

That's why I say 4-12, 5-11 might not be bad? hopefully that'll influence Clark and say look the fans arent coming to the games anymore? we're going into the opposite direction, something is wrong we need to make changes.

I think that is what it will take? And if that is not good enough to get Peterson fired, I will never follow this team again.

As a fan, just view me as the kind of guy, that looks upon severe failure as hope? Hope for a better future, and possibly a shift into the minds that ownership can alter and change their ways of thinking a little.

I just hope that Clark is of his word. As a fan that is what I want to see. If he cares about winning then do the right thing and fire Carl and Herm the heck outta town.

OctoberFart 11-25-2007 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE
. The Cowboys are sure to lose him, and should probably dump that fat turd Wade Phillips and promote Garrett.

Wade Phillips is a good coach who never gets any credit. Once again you prove you know crap about football.

Mecca 11-25-2007 11:27 PM

Sadly for anything to happen I think we'll have to be bad for more than a year......so bad we have blackouts and the fan interest becomes so bad we become a joke franchise.

Nothing else has gotten any change around here.

DaneMcCloud 11-25-2007 11:28 PM

Jason Garrett would be a major mistake, given it's his first year as an offensive coordinator. Dallas has waaaay more offensive weapons than the Chiefs and until the Chiefs replace at least three offensive lineman next year and add another *good* receiver, they're going to continue to struggle.

Regardless, Jerry Jones will out-spend anyone if he so chooses.

Hammock Parties 11-25-2007 11:28 PM

I'm all for 4-12. We MIGHT have a shot at Jake Long.

KCJohnny 11-26-2007 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE
I'm all for 4-12. We MIGHT have a shot at Jake Long.

I was pimping Jake Long 3 weeks ago, you imposter!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.