We should of went for 2!!!
 

I don't understand why we did not go for 2? That makes 0 sense. It could and should be a 3 point game right now. :cuss:

Do you even understand football?

I understand we have a much better chance at kicking a FG than scoring a TD.

You go for two when you need to.

What happens if the Pats score a field goal on the next drive? Then you're screwed.

You guys are out there man. Who cares? You act like we have a chance at the end zone. I'm saying we have a better chance to play D and kick 2 FG's than score a TD.

Do you even understand football?

Ask yourself that question. You are the one laboring under the dillusion that we can score a TD.

You must have missed the Bowe TD.

What on God's green earth makes you have any confidence at all that we will score another TD?

Wht ****ing game are you watching?

Again, I have to ask, do you understand football?

Gee had we gone for two and get a TD here....

this thread is now about how petegz28 should STFU.

Yeah...I agree mikey.

Yeah why make it a 1 score game?

Do you have any idea what it would have looked like if they were at 9 points right there, then scored a TD, and failed to get the 2 pt conversion?

You really have to shut up.

do you have any idea how the game may of changed if they were only up by 3 instead of 4?


I mean if you want to play if's.....

Do you even understand football?

did you get hit in the head repeatedly as a child?

Are you ****ing retarted? Just have to ask.

WTF? Are you an idiot?

You're the one who thought we would score TD's, not me.

Pete, it's amazing. You really are as stupid as I remember you from last season.

Well seeing as I was right, we never scored another TD, I guess I'll take being stupid and right as opposed to whatever it is you are.

:D

I'd feel a heck of a lot better if we would have lost 17-11.

Good God..........

I'm so proud of you.

off topic, but hey, a friend of mine did a really shitty job of starting to build my deck. Should I pay him to finish? How much should I pay him?

Eh,... isn't a two point conversion basically scoring an extra TD?

ROFL

At that point of the game I would of said no cause you go from the 2. However the last 4 plays of the game, barring the clear PI not being called, you are right I am afraid.

You're an idiot.

Wow, am I supposed to be impressed with you now or something? Big shit talker, calling people names behind his keyboard.

Is this better.....
I am in total awe of your internet skill to sling insult after insult on a message board. I stand impressed and will now aspire only to be a jack off on the internet boards where I can pretend to be someone important with the hope tht I can be at least half the ass-bundle of sticks you are.

ROFL

Is that better ?

LOL

It's amazing that you are still bumping this abortion of a thread back up.

I agree with you pete....had we scored a TD on the last drive, I would have gone for 2.

Hmm now it's an abortion of a thread. Though you have been here posting several times.


Oh wait I guess I wasn't supposed to point that out.

ROFL

You probably have as many i fnot mroe posts in this thread than me.

what a ****ing maroon!!!!

I would of gone for 2 to make it 14-11. That I think would of kept things going in our favor. To me at that point a 1 score game would of put the pressure more on their O and their backup QB and maybe gave our O a little momentum.

that's just me but it was in the 3rd Q and we were not exactly moving the ball up and down the field.

No we shouldnt have.

I'm posting in it because it's hilarious to me that you actually believe what you're saying. You've even had a number of people make fun of your stupidity, and yet, you're still holding on to your reeruned belief. It's entertaining.

Never go for 2 until at least the 4th quarter... preferably LATE int eh 4th quarter.

"We should have..."

Well, we didn't so you all got your way. Can't say it turned out very well though. Probably cause we couldn't score any TD's? Just a guess.

Nice. Somebody here understands football.

Right, sure, what other excuses do you have girlie?

Even if I can't consistently negotiate the word "The" on my keyboard.

You're assuming that the chiefs are the average football team.

Again I have to ask what ****ing game you people were watching that gave you any impression that our 1 trip to the end zone was going to be repeated?

This has to be the dumbest thread of the day so far. And that is saying something.

Well it is now!

ROFL

Do you not have any shame at all?

I can't believe you're actually arguing this. It's hilarious.

I'm assuming the Chiefs are a professional football team. You don't get silly just because you are desperate. Hell, if a team decided to go for 2 every time, because their chances of converting were slightly more than 50%... I could respect that, but simply doing it earlier in the 4th quarter because you have no faith in your team is no way to coach.

Well, I have you here, STILL! That has to count for something since this thread is such an abortion.

I know, I know, you are cause this that and the other thing.

I didn't say to go for 2 every time though did I?:eek:

Well once again your assumptions are the err of your ways there.


This team is an ungorganized joke. Sadly.

I didn't say you did, did I? :eek:

Great thread pete.

They may be Ungorganized, but we all know going in it's a rebuild year. There's no sense in us losing our shit because of one play in game 1. Especially if that play is a desperation play in the 3rd friggin quarter.

Dude, you've got to shut up already.

Rebuilding? Our kicker could barely kick the ball past the 15, how many kickers now in a row is that? Why is is every other team in the NFL can get a kicker to kick to the goal line but us?

We kept running the ball for 1 yard up the middle, throwing sidways, Huard is still throwing the ball 10 miles high and can't throw a fade for shit, our WR' cannot get separtaion at all and our safety's and LB's still over-pursue.

And our starting QB is hurt..AGAIN.


This is how many years in a row? We looked soft and we have looked soft since Marty left.

You're free to leave anytime you want. In fact since you are just being a total asshole I would welcome it. No one is forcing you to post in this thread.

No but you implied plain as day. Maybe you didn't mean too...but you did.

Oh, you're upset because your idea is completely retarted and somebody called you on it? My bad. I didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

Ok, you got me.

Are you happy now?

You are right, I am wrong......does that make you feel better?

haha. wow. somehow this thread is awesome in it's stupidity

Yes.

Yes.
Rebuilding. I'm not sure how to help you understand that means we are going to A) Have some players that don't play that well because they are still learning, and B) Have some players who don't play that well because we are waiting for them to flush out of the system.

I don't count kickers in a rebuild. We can always sign old kickers, as they have little to no effect on team chem. We just keep getting poor ones. I agree our WRs (on the field today) don't get "separtation." But I don't think we are looking for burners,a s much as big targets, anyway. Herm said before the seasons he wasn't going to give up on a certain type of run just because it fails a time or two. You may not like it, and I may not like it, but that's what we are going to get. It's a part of his rebuild... and unfortunately, he's got the keys to the car... all we can do is sit and watch. Just one more reason I won't get outraged that they didn't attempt a move of desperation in the 3rd quarter of the first game of the year.

Good, now leave.

I didn't imply. You may have inferred, but I certainly didn't imply. As a matter of fact, I think it was clear that my hypothetical was in contrast to you want of a move of desperation.
Maybe you need to take a look at why you are being so defensive, here.

As soon as you do, douche.

Exactly, kickers shouldn't count though we are the only 1 of 30 teams that can't get a decent kicker year after year after year.


You don't think a kicker putting a ball 2 yards deep so you converage team can keep the guy pinned at or behind the 20 doesn't build good chem?

I guess knowing you have a solid kicker to come in and win the game for you doesn't help either?

They still pay Herm and Carl, so.... yeah.

My thread little girl. Stay and whine all you want though. You made your point. So go on and go annoy your parents or something.

He doesn't seem to think about things like that.

How many kickers int he NFL put the ball 2 yards deep in the end zone?

And no... it doesn't build chemistry.

Haha. But this is just so much more fun!

Ok, if you say so....


Meanwhile we have lost more games over the last how many season cause we can't get a solid kicker.....:shake:

nobody got my joke. :doh!:

I asked a question. How many kickers in the NFL do that?
I agree our kicking game has been bad. I wish like crazy we had drafted Crosby.
But realistically, since then, what could we have done at the position to make you happy? Was there a kicker you'd have liked to see drafted? Was there a free agent we had a shot at? Would you like the Chiefs to trade for one?

I tried but it was so stupid it could hardly be called a joke.

At least 16, seems every team we play can do it....maybe for just that one game but damn it they do it.

So... no ideas?

All I know is every other team seems to get kickers without any issues.

And some take rejects of ours to super bowls.


Something just isn't stirring the kool-aid there.

Not that I want Tynes but you have to start wondering about who is evaluating our talent?