ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football If You Had The Choice....? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=199465)

cardken 12-30-2008 09:26 PM

If You Had The Choice....?
 
Which teams HC/GM vacancy would you choose to fill?

cardken 12-30-2008 09:35 PM

I take the Jets better situation from "Jump Street". Young Offensive Line, Two good Running Backs, decent Receivers, and a solid and growing defense.Only negative would be QB Questionable. I love the Chiefs but to be honest would be a Sh@* Storm to walk into. The Jets have a faster road to success.

Mr. Flopnuts 12-30-2008 09:36 PM

I think the Chiefs have the best nucleus in the league right now. Sincerely. Whoever takes that job could be the next Belicheck.

Molitoth 12-30-2008 09:37 PM

I would choose Chiefs.

great fans. great stadium. great bbq. great tradition. the media is weak compared to NY. young team. good cap room.

hmmmm

Hoover 12-30-2008 09:37 PM

For me its the Broncos.

Great City, and ready to win in a weak AFC West. They have a good young QB, WR, and LT.

Ebolapox 12-30-2008 09:38 PM

is this thread reeruned? this is a chiefs message board. who the **** do you think that most people would pick?

StcChief 12-30-2008 09:39 PM

The Chiefs young team, great situation, owner believing in "long term" approach. Not win immediately, show improvement. /homer hat firmly attached

yeti 12-30-2008 09:39 PM

Cleveland. In NY and Denver you would be run out of town if you didn't produce immediately.

cardken 12-30-2008 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 5342491)
is this thread reeruned? this is a chiefs message board. who the **** do you think that most people would pick?

Was just checking to see if anyone besides yourself was being objective.

Quesadilla Joe 12-30-2008 09:52 PM

Denver is without a doubt the most attractive job opening.

Franchise QB- Check
Offensive Line - Check
WR's - Check
RB's - Check

All Denver needs is a MLB, Safety, and a stud DE and they are contenders. Then take into account who the owner is in Denver and it makes it an even easier decision.

cardken 12-30-2008 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yeti (Post 5342502)
Cleveland. In NY and Denver you would be run out of town if you didn't produce immediately.

Cleveland and K.C. would both let you be average to sub-par for years before the heat came down.

Ultra Peanut 12-30-2008 10:02 PM

The Broncos have a lot of talent.

Dave Lane 12-30-2008 10:03 PM

I love the Chiefs But the Denver job if I wasn't a Chiefs fan would have more appeal.

Dave

Chief Wiggum 12-30-2008 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yeti (Post 5342502)
Cleveland. In NY and Denver you would be run out of town if you didn't produce immediately.

Not sure if I agree with that - I think it's KC or Denver specifically because I think both of the owners don't overreact. Look at Shanny (there 13 years) and Carl (20 years). Denver always competes and Bowlen pays better.

I freakin' hate the Broncos, but if I were a perspective coach/GM - Denver is where I would pick.

RippedmyFlesh 12-30-2008 10:10 PM

KC
and not just because I am a chiefs fan
high draft picks...cap room...patient ownership.. who wants to play with the big boys now I am hoping...rabid fan base.
Denver may be closer but anyone who follows herm is going to look like a genius compared to trying to be shanarat II

banyon 12-30-2008 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cutler7624 (Post 5342563)
.

Franchise QB- Check
Offensive Line - Check
WR's - Check
RB's - Check :BS:

.

I picked Denver too, but I don't think having 8 rb's in a year means you have anybody who is reliable.

OnTheWarpath15 12-30-2008 10:13 PM

Denver or Cleveland, as they have a franchise QB in place.

Quesadilla Joe 12-30-2008 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banyon (Post 5342627)
I picked Denver too, but I don't think having 8 rb's in a year means you have anybody who is reliable.

If the head coach keeps Dennison (O-line coach) and Bobby Turner (RB's coach) we should be fine at RB. If we keep them we can still keep drafting late round RB's and be just fine because of the coaching and the scheme.

banyon 12-30-2008 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cutler7624 (Post 5342647)
If the head coach keeps Dennison (O-line coach) and Bobby Turner (RB's coach) we should be fine at RB. If we keep them we can still keep drafting late round RB's and be just fine because of the coaching and the scheme.

Neither of those guys are Alex Gibbs, as this year demonstrated pretty emphatically.

In any event "RB's check" rings pretty hollow.

Quesadilla Joe 12-30-2008 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banyon (Post 5342655)
Neither of those guys are Alex Gibbs, as this year demonstrated pretty emphatically.

In any event "RB's check" rings pretty hollow.

How so? Peyton Hillis, Ryan Torrain, Selvin Young, PJ Pope, and Tatum Bell each averaged over 5 Yards per carry this year. 5 no names doing that is pretty impressive.

We haven't had Alex Gibbs for a while and we still are consistently in the top 5 in yards per carry and top 10 in rushing yards. The RB's got hurt, that wasn't Dennison's or Bobby Turner's fault. Turner has been here since Terrell Davis he is the best in the business for coaching RB's in our scheme.

RippedmyFlesh 12-30-2008 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5342632)
Denver or Cleveland, as they have a franchise QB in place.

Yes but if you were in KC you could pick your own QB and to me that would be fun.
To me I am not sure what is in cleveland or denver is better than what is out there in this year's draft. I would take my chances armed with the 3rd pick
that I could get a qb to compete with either of those teams because in KC you would have the time to do it . I think as a coach you would have more time to get it done in KC than other places.

wazu 12-30-2008 10:25 PM

KC. Denver would be the best, if it weren't for the fact that you are replacing one of the best coaches in the NFL. Do you think 5-11 is going to be acceptable in Denver next year? Just try telling them you are "rebuilding" and see how far that gets you.

OnTheWarpath15 12-30-2008 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RippedmyFlesh (Post 5342674)
Yes but if you were in KC you could pick your own QB and to me that would be fun.
To me I am not sure what is in cleveland or denver is better than what is out there in this year's draft. I would take my chances armed with the 3rd pick
that I could get a qb to compete with either of those teams because in KC you would have the time to do it . I think as a coach you would have more time to get it done in KC than other places.

I'll gladly take what Jay Cutler has shown in 2 years than take a huge risk with a college player.

That's like telling the dealer in your poker game that you want to give back your pocket kings, and will take your chances on the next two cards in the deck.

blueballs 12-30-2008 10:26 PM

The Jets are suppose to be tight to the cap
if Favre goes that frees up 13 million
a 3rd rounder goes to the Pack

banyon 12-30-2008 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cutler7624 (Post 5342672)
How so? Peyton Hillis, Ryan Torrain, Selvin Young, PJ Pope, and Tatum Bell each averaged over 5 Yards per carry this year. 5 no names doing that is pretty impressive.

.

I'm sorry who's your running back again? 10 guys? You going to pay all of those guys like >5.0 ypc guys? You may need to cut your real talent to do that.

KCChiefsMan 12-30-2008 10:28 PM

of course I'd pick the Chiefs, if I wasn't a fan the most attractive job would probably be the broncos

blueballs 12-30-2008 10:30 PM

KC would be attractive to a GM
and Denver to the HC
IMO

ClevelandBronco 12-30-2008 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yeti (Post 5342502)
Cleveland. In NY and Denver you would be run out of town if you didn't produce immediately.

That's the problem, although you might get a season or two of slack in Denver because you'd be starting out without a defense.

The fact is, though, that the next guy is probably going to be the coaching equivalent of Brian Griese.

Cleveland hasn't won a damned thing since 1964 (in any sport). If you were successful you'd be a minor god for the rest of your life.

Quesadilla Joe 12-30-2008 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banyon (Post 5342688)
I'm sorry who's your running back again? 10 guys? You going to pay all of those guys like >5.0 ypc guys? You may need to cut your real talent to do that.

We don't shell out big bucks for RB's. Clinton Portis wanted big money and he was traded. That is how it goes in Denver... RB's are expendable. As long as they show they can make one cut and hit the hole in college, they will succeed here in Denver.

BigMeatballDave 12-30-2008 10:35 PM

Denver. I'd put our current coaching staff there. Except for Chan Gailey. I'd make Paul Hackett their coordinator.

RippedmyFlesh 12-30-2008 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5342682)
I'll gladly take what Jay Cutler has shown in 2 years than take a huge risk with a college player.

That's like telling the dealer in your poker game that you want to give back your pocket kings, and will take your chances on the next two cards in the deck.

It is not a knock on cutler I just think this may be a good year for qb's.
I think there are more than 1 qb coming out this year that COULD be great.
Last year I would have taken cutler vs the field.
This years best qb's are so young you just don't know how good they can get so it's a tough call.

blueballs 12-30-2008 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5342716)
Denver. I'd put our current coaching staff there. Except for Chan Gailey. I'd make Paul Hackett their coordinator.

think you can retire on half a year's HC salary
and free beer for life

BigMeatballDave 12-30-2008 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueballs (Post 5342722)
think you can retire on half a year's HC salary
and free beer for life

No. I HATE Denver. I want them to suck as bad as we do now. The thread starter didn't say anything building a championship. :D


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.