ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Tyler Thigpen Fans (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200545)

Saul Good 01-17-2009 06:02 PM

Tyler Thigpen Fans
 
For those of you who think that Thigpen is a legitimate NFL starter, answer this:

What do you think he would bring via a trade?

Matt Cassel, for example, is 2 years older than Thigpen. The Patriots wouldn't even think of letting him go for less than a mid to high first round pick.

If Thigpen is really a legitimate NFL starter, he should be worth at least that much. What would the reaction be from GMs around the league if we shopped him for a high first round pick?

What is the highest pick you think any team would be willing to give

007 01-17-2009 06:04 PM

popcorn time.

DeezNutz 01-17-2009 06:04 PM

1st.

Excitement.

Thread over.

Dave Lane 01-17-2009 06:05 PM

7th?

But I'm not a big fan. He has enough potential in my mind to hang on to but about zero trade value.

Dave

DeezNutz 01-17-2009 06:07 PM

I've read and heard that Thiggy compares favorable to Steadman, Marino, Elway, Favre, and Shore.

Skip Towne 01-17-2009 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5400288)
I've read and heard that Thiggy compares favorable to Steadman, Marino, Elway, Favre, and Shore.

What are you smoking?

Rigodan 01-17-2009 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne (Post 5400291)
What are you smoking?

I'm sure he's read that. Unfortunately it was on here.

kstater 01-17-2009 06:11 PM

TBH, it's a legit angle. That said, I don't believe Cassell is worth a 1st.

FringeNC 01-17-2009 06:12 PM

I really don't understand why the anti-Thigpen crowd is so confident Pioli will think he is nothing more than a marginal backup.

Pioli seems like the type of guy that could care less that Thigpen doesn't have the credentials (high draft pick). And I think he is going to be more concerned with Thigpen's intangibles versus his height.

I don't know what Pioli is going to do, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if Thigpen is our starter next year.

BigMeatballDave 01-17-2009 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5400298)
I really don't understand why the anti-Thigpen crowd is so confident Pioli will think he is nothing more than a marginal backup.

Probably because he watched Brady lead the Pats to 3 SB Championships. Yeah, that might have something to do with it...

Ultra Peanut 01-17-2009 06:19 PM

I wouldn't give a 1st for Cassel, and I wouldn't give a 4th for Thiggy.

Mr. Laz 01-17-2009 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 5400277)
For those of you who think that Thigpen is a legitimate NFL starter, answer this:

What do you think he would bring via a trade?

Matt Cassel, for example, is 2 years older than Thigpen. The Patriots wouldn't even think of letting him go for less than a mid to high first round pick.

If Thigpen is really a legitimate NFL starter, he should be worth at least that much. What would the reaction be from GMs around the league if we shopped him for a high first round pick?

What is the highest pick you think any team would be willing to give

:Poke::Poke::Poke:

Danman 01-17-2009 06:22 PM

Thigpen has fans?

DeezNutz 01-17-2009 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne (Post 5400291)
What are you smoking?

I don't own a smoker, unfortunately.

teedubya 01-17-2009 06:24 PM

WOW. Someone else needs to go 100 days without weed.

rad 01-17-2009 06:24 PM

Who's Tyler Thigpen?

kobebehar 01-17-2009 06:30 PM

Thigpen ftw. Seriously I think that it should be an open competition in camp, which is why Im not totally randy for the idea of picking a QB 3rd, because then Thiggy doesnt have a shot, despite I think possibly having the stuff to be our QB.

smittysbar 01-17-2009 06:32 PM

IMO Cassell is not worth a 1st and Thigpen is not worth much at all, except to hold onto for a decent back up.

BigMeatballDave 01-17-2009 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kobebehar (Post 5400345)
Thigpen ftw. Seriously I think that it should be an open competition in camp, which is why Im not totally randy for the idea of picking a QB 3rd, because then Thiggy doesnt have a shot, despite I think possibly having the stuff to be our QB.

What are YOU smoking?

kobebehar 01-17-2009 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5400351)
What are YOU smoking?

Your sister's pole mostly.

rad 01-17-2009 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kobebehar (Post 5400354)
Your sister's pole mostly.

OH SHIT.

BigMeatballDave 01-17-2009 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kobebehar (Post 5400354)
Your sister's pole mostly.

LMAO Was that supposed to offend me?

rad 01-17-2009 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5400365)
LMAO Was that supposed to offend me?

That was a good one wasn't it? I repped him for it, I hope you don't mind, but I hardly ever actually laugh out loud reading this stuff.

DeezNutz 01-17-2009 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kobebehar (Post 5400354)
Your sister's pole mostly.

Not many posters use pictures of themselves in their avi's. Brave choice.

dorseybowe 01-17-2009 07:06 PM

It seems unlikely that the Chiefs would be willing to trade Thigpen. He will either be the starter next season or in competition with the quarterback we draft.

boogblaster 01-17-2009 07:08 PM

Thiggy could be .. but who knows ....

MIAdragon 01-17-2009 07:14 PM

I dont see Cassel being much of an upgrade over Thiggy.

JuicesFlowing 01-17-2009 07:22 PM

Thigpen has a major problem: wherever he goes, he needs to bring an entire spread offense system with him. He was fun as hell to watch in a 2-14 season, but I don't know what that's really worth.

BigMeatballDave 01-17-2009 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAdragon (Post 5400404)
I dont see Cassel being much of an upgrade over Thiggy.

ROFL

DeezNutz 01-17-2009 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JuicesFlowing (Post 5400414)
Thigpen has a major problem: wherever he goes, he needs to bring an entire spread offense system with him. He was fun as hell to watch in a 2-14 season, but I don't know what that's really worth.

"Wherever we go we bring the monkey with us..."

googlegoogle 01-17-2009 07:40 PM

I think a 5th is possible. The guy has exp now and some team would give it for him. Known quantity.

RealSNR 01-17-2009 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5400419)
ROFL

Why do you say that?

Cassell has to "prove it" just as much as Thigpen does. Until then, he's just another Derek Anderson

Halfcan 01-17-2009 08:05 PM

We need to build freakin D on this team-thiggy stays another year imo.

Mecca 01-17-2009 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 5400477)
We need to build freakin D on this team-thiggy stays another year imo.

I think we need to build everything...

MIAdragon 01-17-2009 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5400419)
ROFL

Hey I can do that too!! ROFL ROFL :rolleyes:

You think he could put up the numbers he did with THIS team, yea I dont think so.....

Halfcan 01-17-2009 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5400478)
I think we need to build everything...

I would say that is true-but QB is by far Not our weakest position. With another playmaker receiver and some descent O line help-Thiggy could put up some outstanding numbers-on the ground and in the air.

EyePod 01-17-2009 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 5400277)
For those of you who think that Thigpen is a legitimate NFL starter, answer this:

What do you think he would bring via a trade?

Matt Cassel, for example, is 2 years older than Thigpen. The Patriots wouldn't even think of letting him go for less than a mid to high first round pick.

If Thigpen is really a legitimate NFL starter, he should be worth at least that much. What would the reaction be from GMs around the league if we shopped him for a high first round pick?

What is the highest pick you think any team would be willing to give

3rd. I don't think you're looking at it the right way though. He has UPSIDE. People don't trade for upside, they trade for proven ability. Give him another year.

el borracho 01-17-2009 08:15 PM

I would say Thigpen is worth a 5th. It seems very unlikely he will ever be an elite QB but he has some value.

EyePod 01-17-2009 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5400288)
I've read and heard that Thiggy compares favorable to Steadman, Marino, Elway, Favre, and Shore.

Gannon too.

EyePod 01-17-2009 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 5400484)
I would say that is true-but QB is by far Not our weakest position. With another playmaker receiver and some descent O line help-Thiggy could put up some outstanding numbers-on the ground and in the air.

This.

Lex Luthors 01-17-2009 08:31 PM

Thigpen has no trade value. This is a guy the Chiefs picked up on waivers, and he won a grand total of one game as a starter.

He's worth far more to the Chiefs because he's the best quarterback they have on the roster right now. Even if they draft Stafford or Sanchez, they need to keep Thigpen around.

I don't get all the Thigpen-haters who insist that he simply cannot play unless he is running the spread offense. Give the guy a freaking chance to learn and develop like any other young quarterback.

blueballs 01-17-2009 08:59 PM

random bible quote thread

Jesus went out along the sea.
All the crowd came to him and he taught them.
As he passed by, he saw Levi, son of Alphaeus,
sitting at the customs post.
Jesus said to him, “Follow me.”
And he got up and followed Jesus.
While he was at table in his house,
many tax collectors and sinners sat with Jesus and his disciples;
for there were many who followed him.
Some scribes who were Pharisees saw that Jesus was eating with sinners
and tax collectors and said to his disciples,
“Why does he eat with tax collectors and sinners?”
Jesus heard this and said to them,
“Those who are well do not need a physician, but the sick do.
I did not come to call the righteous but sinners.”

FloridaMan88 01-17-2009 09:25 PM

Thigpen had exactly 1 win as a starting QB (and he was a big part of the Chiefs losses when he was the starting QB), Thigpen had a horrible completion %, and Thigpen needed a gimmicky offense to even look like a halfway competent QB.

That isn't impressive to anyone other than Herm and the blind Thigpen supporters on this board.

BigMeatballDave 01-17-2009 10:03 PM

I hope we draft Stafford or Sanchez. Then, maybe, the Thigpenites will see what a real QB looks like.

RealSNR 01-17-2009 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lex Luthor (Post 5400510)
Thigpen has no trade value. This is a guy the Chiefs picked up on waivers, and he won a grand total of one game as a starter.

He's worth far more to the Chiefs because he's the best quarterback they have on the roster right now. Even if they draft Stafford or Sanchez, they need to keep Thigpen around.

I don't get all the Thigpen-haters who insist that he simply cannot play unless he is running the spread offense. Give the guy a freaking chance to learn and develop like any other young quarterback.

He can do that as he's fighting for his job. Just like any other QB in the NFL.

If he's that good, he'll be able to beat out a measly rookie in training camp

BigMeatballDave 01-17-2009 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lex Luthor (Post 5400510)
I don't get all the Thigpen-haters who insist that he simply cannot play unless he is running the spread offense. Give the guy a freaking chance to learn and develop like any other young quarterback.

Who hates him? I don't, but I am critical of him. If we draft a QB at #3, Thig is done. We'll no longer be running the spread.

wazu 01-18-2009 12:11 AM

He's worth a 5th.

chiefzilla1501 01-18-2009 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 5400592)
Thigpen had exactly 1 win as a starting QB (and he was a big part of the Chiefs losses when he was the starting QB), Thigpen had a horrible completion %, and Thigpen needed a gimmicky offense to even look like a halfway competent QB.

That isn't impressive to anyone other than Herm and the blind Thigpen supporters on this board.

Yeah, all his fault.

Nevermind that he was running an offense with an incomplete playbook.
Nevermind that he had close to zero reps with his receivers in the offseason
Nevermind that he was starting the first games of his entire career
Nevermind that he has zero running game and had to throw well over half of the time--I'd like to see Matt Ryan or Joe Flacco win games when you're forced to throw on 2 of every 3 snaps
Nevermind that he also had arguably the worst defense in the NFL to back him up when things weren't perfect

There are no blind Thigpen supporters on this board. There are plenty that believe that he deserves the same shot to succeed as any legit QB gets. He flashed a lot of ability, and a lot of downside. It's ridiculous to suggest he's shown nothing. Do I think he's the answer? Not yet. Do I think he's a failure? Not yet.

kobebehar 01-18-2009 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5400365)
LMAO Was that supposed to offend me?

are you kidding? How could something that absurd offend anyone? lol

RealSNR 01-18-2009 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 5400919)
Yeah, all his fault.

Nevermind that he was running an offense with an incomplete playbook.
Nevermind that he had close to zero reps with his receivers in the offseason
Nevermind that he was starting the first games of his entire career
Nevermind that he has zero running game and had to throw well over half of the time--I'd like to see Matt Ryan or Joe Flacco win games when you're forced to throw on 2 of every 3 snaps
Nevermind that he also had arguably the worst defense in the NFL to back him up when things weren't perfect

There are no blind Thigpen supporters on this board. There are plenty that believe that he deserves the same shot to succeed as any legit QB gets. He flashed a lot of ability, and a lot of downside. It's ridiculous to suggest he's shown nothing. Do I think he's the answer? Not yet. Do I think he's a failure? Not yet.

Okay, please define "deserves the same shot to succeed as any legit QB gets." Does that mean we shouldn't draft a QB in the 1st? What?

I'm pretty sure he IS getting a fair shot. We're going to keep him on the team, give him a somewhat decent spot on the depth chart, and likely have him compete in training camp to keep his starting job. This is the NFL. NOTHING is guaranteed unless you've been successful season after season after season.

Thigpen has a shot at the job. We're just asking him to work at it and prove it. What the hell is wrong with that?

aturnis 01-18-2009 12:55 AM

Thigpen hasn't been a winner yet. Everyone see's the promise, but promise doesn't equal wins. I think you could get a 6th for him though. Now if he played next year, in a pro style system and showed he could win, he could fetch a 3rd to a first depending on our record and his numbers. He may play too much next year. Who knows? It should be a more exciting year either way.

ClevelandBronco 01-18-2009 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 5400277)
What is the highest pick you think any team would be willing to give

Sixth. Maybe fifth.

ChiefsCountry 01-18-2009 01:14 AM

Best case scenario for us is we draft a QB ie Stafford or Sanchez and Thigpen just goes off and we can trade him for a boatload of picks. More than likely he will be just a backup.

dj56dt58 01-18-2009 01:21 AM

We get rid of Thigpen we're gonna regret it..all he needs is to be able to take snaps from under center which he can get good at. He didn't take hardly any snaps in the offseason because he wasn't supposed to play. Get the guy a coach that can develop a qb and he will develop into a damn good qb..of course nobody here knows shit about developing a qb, you all want to develop one but if they don't put up Manning #s in their first season its time to move on.

dj56dt58 01-18-2009 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 5401006)
Thigpen hasn't been a winner yet. Everyone see's the promise, but promise doesn't equal wins.

it does with coaching

RealSNR 01-18-2009 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj56dt58 (Post 5401039)
We get rid of Thigpen we're gonna regret it..all he needs is to be able to take snaps from under center which he can get good at. He didn't take hardly any snaps in the offseason because he wasn't supposed to play. Get the guy a coach that can develop a qb and he will develop into a damn good qb..of course nobody here knows shit about developing a qb, you all want to develop one but if they don't put up Manning #s in their first season its time to move on.

Okay, sure, you have a point.

But guess what?

We're not getting rid of Thigpen.

This simple premise is not hard to comprehend. At all.

cdcox 01-18-2009 03:39 AM

Heck, I'm not a fan, but he's definitely worth a third. He's working his way up to having as much potential as Brodie Croyle did when we drafted him. He probably won't develop into a franchise QB, but you can't completely rule it out.

kobebehar 01-18-2009 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 5401002)
Okay, please define "deserves the same shot to succeed as any legit QB gets." Does that mean we shouldn't draft a QB in the 1st? What?

I'm pretty sure he IS getting a fair shot. We're going to keep him on the team, give him a somewhat decent spot on the depth chart, and likely have him compete in training camp to keep his starting job. This is the NFL. NOTHING is guaranteed unless you've been successful season after season after season.

Thigpen has a shot at the job. We're just asking him to work at it and prove it. What the hell is wrong with that?

D00d, you're being a srs meanie-head. Thigpen FTW

dj56dt58 01-18-2009 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 5401149)
Okay, sure, you have a point.

But guess what?

We're not getting rid of Thigpen.

This simple premise is not hard to comprehend. At all.

I know we're not, luckily these idiots don't run the Chiefs


Not saying he's going to be great, but he's certainly got some tools to work with, and with a decent coaching staff could end up being pretty damn good

Mecca 01-18-2009 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj56dt58 (Post 5401194)
I know we're not, luckily these idiots don't run the Chiefs


Not saying he's going to be great, but he's certainly got some tools to work with, and with a decent coaching staff could end up being pretty damn good

I'd rather deal with someone that wants a QB running the team than the people who want to draft 500 offensive lineman..

I don't care about Thigpens stats other than YPA and completion % those are highly important stats.

I know what I personally saw...I saw a rather inaccurate passer who couldn't play from center and got very lucky he didn't have numerous more INT's. His 54% completion percentage in the offense that was run for him is scary.

What if defenders catch just an average number of the balls Thigpen hit them with then he has 10 more INT's and people are talking about how he's just brutal right?

DenverChief 01-18-2009 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JuicesFlowing (Post 5400414)
Thigpen has a major problem: wherever he goes, he needs to bring an entire spread offense system with him.


I dunno I think with an entire offseason and TC I'd bet he can run a "pro" offense - I think the reason why they did it was because he is super comfortable in it and didn't need much work to make it work and try and win - yeah it didn't work all that great but had the _efense not collapsed in a few games we could have had 6-7 wins

BigMeatballDave 01-18-2009 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 5401247)
I dunno I think with an entire offseason and TC I'd bet he can run a "pro" offense - I think the reason why they did it was because he is super comfortable in it and didn't need much work to make it work and try and win - yeah it didn't work all that great but had the _efense not collapsed in a few games we could have had 6-7 wins

No. His completion percentage sucks. And he struggled as games went along. He was horrible in the 4th qt. No D is going to improve that. Ideally, you want your QB to play well in the 2nd half.

DenverChief 01-18-2009 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5401253)
No. His completion percentage sucks. And he struggled as games went along. He was horrible in the 4th qt. No D is going to improve that. Ideally, you want your QB to play well in the 2nd half.

yeah well I'm inclined to believe that the guy who was running the scout offense until week 5 probably needs more practice...if he doesn't work out no big deal...but I'm not giving up on him yet...

BigMeatballDave 01-18-2009 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 5401256)
yeah well I'm inclined to believe that the guy who was running the scout offense until week 5 probably needs more practice...if he doesn't work out no big deal...but I'm not giving up on him yet...

If we select a QB at #3, Thig is done. Period.

Lex Luthors 01-18-2009 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5401261)
If we select a QB at #3, Thig is done. Period.

"He's right. My career was over when my team drafted Philip Rivers." - Drew Brees

In no way am I saying that Thigpen could be another Drew Brees. What I am saying is that you draft a QB at #3 and you KEEP Thigpen. Let them fight for the job next year. If Thigpen wins the job, your rookie QB doesn't have the pressure of starting at once. If Stafford or Sanchez wins the job, Thigpen is a decent backup QB.

BigMeatballDave 01-18-2009 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lex Luthor (Post 5401283)
"He's right. My career was over when my team drafted Philip Rivers." - Drew Brees

In no way am I saying that Thigpen could be another Drew Brees. What I am saying is that you draft a QB at #3 and you KEEP Thigpen. Let them fight for the job next year. If Thigpen wins the job, your rookie QB doesn't have the pressure of starting at once. If Stafford or Sanchez wins the job, Thigpen is a decent backup QB.

This is what I'm saying. Thig would make a good back up. There is no way Stafford or Sanchez does not beat out Thig in TC.

Lex Luthors 01-18-2009 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5401313)
This is what I'm saying. Thig would make a good back up. There is no way Stafford or Sanchez does not beat out Thig in TC.

Obviously Stafford or Sanchez would start ahead of Thigpen in the long run.

But not necessarily next season.

Lex Luthors 01-18-2009 09:12 AM

If you were a Redskins fan back in 1994, you probably would have been just as sure that there is NO WAY Gus Frerotte beats out Heath Shuler for starting QB. Heath Shuler was the #3 overall pick, and he got beat out by a fellow rookie QB.

BigMeatballDave 01-18-2009 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lex Luthor (Post 5401325)
Obviously Stafford or Sanchez would start ahead of Thigpen in the long run.

But not necessarily next season.

I disagree. If we pick a QB 3rd overall, we are going to change the O to suit Stafford/Sanchez. Its not going to be a spread O. Thig will have to adjust. Matt or Mark will already be ahead of Tyler here.

BigMeatballDave 01-18-2009 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lex Luthor (Post 5401338)
If you were a Redskins fan back in 1994, you probably would have been just as sure that there is NO WAY Gus Frerotte beats out Heath Shuler for starting QB. Heath Shuler was the #3 overall pick, and he got beat out by a fellow rookie QB.

Whatever. Thigpen is NOWHERE near the talent level of Stafford or Sanchez. Period.

chiefzilla1501 01-18-2009 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5401253)
No. His completion percentage sucks. And he struggled as games went along. He was horrible in the 4th qt. No D is going to improve that. Ideally, you want your QB to play well in the 2nd half.

But under what circumstances?

When you have a thin playbook with few plays in it (remember, Gailey came up with this offense in midseason out of thin air), it's hard to make halftime adjustments.

When you run the ball 10-15 times a game, you do NOTHING to keep the defense on their toes or to exhaust them by powering a guy like LJ through the line of scrimmage.

And especially in the game against Miami, I still don't understand why the hell Gailey and Herm thought it was a good idea to let Thigpen throw the ball 40+ times in the extreme wind--you have to realize that the wind takes a major toll on your arm.

You have to recognize the circumstances Thigpen was thrown into. He didn't receive even an ounce of coaching attention last offseason because 95% of the attention was spent on developing Brodie Croyle. He doesn't have a repoire with many receivers--guys like Peyton Manning know exactly where his receivers are going to be 90% of the time. As for his performance, I didn't see anything better or worse than Peyton Manning.

Is this guy the answer? I don't know. Is he not the answer? I don't know. I don't know how anyone can suggest that he's definitely a career backup nor do I know how anyone can suggest he's the QB of the Future. You bring in strong competition (like a first round pick, if need be), but you have to give him a chance to work his ass off this offseason to improve. This guy fell into a bad situation and performed pretty admirably.

chiefzilla1501 01-18-2009 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 5401002)
Okay, please define "deserves the same shot to succeed as any legit QB gets." Does that mean we shouldn't draft a QB in the 1st? What?

I'm pretty sure he IS getting a fair shot. We're going to keep him on the team, give him a somewhat decent spot on the depth chart, and likely have him compete in training camp to keep his starting job. This is the NFL. NOTHING is guaranteed unless you've been successful season after season after season.

Thigpen has a shot at the job. We're just asking him to work at it and prove it. What the hell is wrong with that?

Yes, you bring in strong competition even if that means a first round pick.

But the Chiefs must, must, MUST stick to their guns on the idea that even if you pick Stafford at #3, Thigpen can keep his job forever if he performs at a high level in 2009. Too many times you see top 10 pick QBs guaranteed the starting job, even if they don't earn the starting job. Can anyone today imagine why Matt Leinart earned a starting job a year ago over Kurt Warner? It's really hard to believe, in hindsight. But that's the trap coaches fall into.

As for "fair", his offensive line sucked, he learned a brand, spanking new offense in midseason with minimal plays, he received almost no coaching attention, he never had a chance to work with receivers, and he has fewer starts than Flacco or Ryan. I'd like to give him an offseason to work with a legit QBs coach and see how he develops, bring in strong competition, and let the best QB win and DO NOT guarantee a starting job to anyone because of draft position.

BigMeatballDave 01-18-2009 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 5401373)
But under what circumstances?

When you have a thin playbook with few plays in it (remember, Gailey came up with this offense in midseason out of thin air), it's hard to make halftime adjustments.

When you run the ball 10-15 times a game, you do NOTHING to keep the defense on their toes or to exhaust them by powering a guy like LJ through the line of scrimmage.

And especially in the game against Miami, I still don't understand why the hell Gailey and Herm thought it was a good idea to let Thigpen throw the ball 40+ times in the extreme wind--you have to realize that the wind takes a major toll on your arm.

You have to recognize the circumstances Thigpen was thrown into. He didn't receive even an ounce of coaching attention last offseason because 95% of the attention was spent on developing Brodie Croyle. He doesn't have a repoire with many receivers--guys like Peyton Manning know exactly where his receivers are going to be 90% of the time. As for his performance, I didn't see anything better or worse than Peyton Manning.

Is this guy the answer? I don't know. Is he not the answer? I don't know. I don't know how anyone can suggest that he's definitely a career backup nor do I know how anyone can suggest he's the QB of the Future. You bring in strong competition (like a first round pick, if need be), but you have to give him a chance to work his ass off this offseason to improve. This guy fell into a bad situation and performed pretty admirably.

He was given a shot because BC and Huard could not stay healthy. If BC wasn't made of glass, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

BigMeatballDave 01-18-2009 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 5401378)
Yes, you bring in strong competition even if that means a first round pick.

But the Chiefs must, must, MUST stick to their guns on the idea that even if you pick Stafford at #3, Thigpen can keep his job forever if he performs at a high level in 2009. Too many times you see top 10 pick QBs guaranteed the starting job, even if they don't earn the starting job. Can anyone today imagine why Matt Leinart earned a starting job a year ago over Kurt Warner? It's really hard to believe, in hindsight. But that's the trap coaches fall into.

As for "fair", his offensive line sucked, he learned a brand, spanking new offense in midseason with minimal plays, he received almost no coaching attention, he never had a chance to work with receivers, and he has fewer starts than Flacco or Ryan. I'd like to give him an offseason to work with a legit QBs coach and see how he develops, bring in strong competition, and let the best QB win and DO NOT guarantee a starting job to anyone because of draft position.

None of this matters. Stafford/Sanchez would beat him out. Period.

Lex Luthors 01-18-2009 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5401495)
None of this matters. Stafford/Sanchez would beat him out. Period.

Hey, don't get me wrong. I would LOVE to see the Chiefs draft either one of those guys, and I would LOVE to see either one of them win the starting job.

What I don't understand is how you have come to the conclusion that Tyler Thigpen CANNOT play in anything other than the spread. All we really know is that Thigpen sucked the first couple of games he played in, that he played very well at times after that, and that they ran the spread the second half of the season.

It has not been proven that Thigpen can ONLY play the spread offense. You are obviously convinced of that, and it may very well turn out that you are correct. But neither one of us has enough information to make a definitive case one way or the other. My guess is that Thigpen learned a hell of a lot this season, he could be a decent starting QB next year, and that he can learn how run a standard NFL offense.

According to Pete Carroll, Sanchez isn't ready for the NFL. It seems to me that making him the starter next year would be the exact wrong thing to do. Give him a chance to learn the NFL game before you throw him to the wolves.

My hope is that the Chiefs draft Sanchez, Thigpen starts the first half of the 2009, and then Sanchez takes over. I see Thigpen as a caretaker quarterback until the franchise quarterback is ready.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-18-2009 10:45 PM

Well, if they for some reason do not get a QB at pick 3 what other option do they have??? Croyle? Another vet reject? I would prefer to get Stafford in the draft and would love to have Sanchez as well, but if they aren't able get one of the 2 it seems Thigpen is the way to go next year.

Lex Luthors 01-18-2009 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 5405226)
Well, if they for some reason do not get a QB at pick 3 what other option do they have??? Croyle? Another vet reject? I would prefer to get Stafford in the draft and would love to have Sanchez as well, but if they aren't able get one of the 2 it seems Thigpen is the way to go next year.

I'm assuming that Stafford will be drafted by the Lions. But who knows, maybe they'll draft another wide receiver.

Oh wait, Matt Millen is gone...

Pasta Little Brioni 01-18-2009 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lex Luthor (Post 5405231)
I'm assuming that Stafford will be drafted by the Lions. But who knows, maybe they'll draft another wide receiver.

Oh wait, Matt Millen is gone...

Yeah, new regime so it is hard to pick on them too much. Of course they do want Gun, so who knows maybe he'll take Krumrie with him and they'll draft some D-lineman who is amazing at the hand fight slap drill.

lazepoo 01-18-2009 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5400298)
I really don't understand why the anti-Thigpen crowd is so confident Pioli will think he is nothing more than a marginal backup.

Pioli seems like the type of guy that could care less that Thigpen doesn't have the credentials (high draft pick). And I think he is going to be more concerned with Thigpen's intangibles versus his height.

I don't know what Pioli is going to do, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if Thigpen is our starter next year.

I remember someone on here mentioning that the only reason that the pats took Brady over Ken Dorsey was that Brady was like 2-3 inches taller, otherwise they felt like it was a wash. That said, I think Pioli will have more than enough tape to analyze to make his decision on Thigpen.

ChiefsCountry 01-18-2009 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazepoo (Post 5405246)
I remember someone on here mentioning that the only reason that the pats took Brady over Ken Dorsey was that Brady was like 2-3 inches taller, otherwise they felt like it was a wash. That said, I think Pioli will have more than enough tape to analyze to make his decision on Thigpen.

Dorsey was still in college when Brady was picked.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.