ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft IF Herm and Carl would have been running the draft.... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206810)

kcbubb 04-27-2009 10:49 AM

IF Herm and Carl would have been running the draft....
 
Herm and Carl select:

1.) Aaron Curry OLB
2.) Everette Brown DE
3.) Kraig Urbik G/OT
4.) Louis Murphy WR
5.) Rhett Bomar QB
6.) Andrew Gardner OT
7.) AQ Shipley C
7.) Khalif Mitchell DT

The Chiefs wouldn't have traded Tony G. And they wouldn't have traded for Cassel. Thiggy would be the starting QB.

Frankie 04-27-2009 10:51 AM

No way to tell. This thread is moot.

chiefs1111 04-27-2009 10:56 AM

I knew we would see a thread about this at some point..

LaChapelle 04-27-2009 10:56 AM

Who's Herm's QB? THigpen? I doubt that.

kcbubb 04-27-2009 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaChapelle (Post 5718730)
Who's Herm's QB? THigpen? I doubt that.

yep... I think he said at some point that Thigpen would be the QB in 09 before he was fired.

EyePod 04-27-2009 11:00 AM

And our hopes would have been oh so high. Then we would have them CRUSHED! I will give Pioli/Haley the benefit of the doubt until the season starts.

StcChief 04-27-2009 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EyePod (Post 5718745)
And our hopes would have been oh so high. Then we would have them CRUSHED! I will give Pioli/Haley the benefit of the doubt until the season starts.

I'm giving the alot longer time. Like 4 years.

kcbubb 04-27-2009 11:04 AM

Herm's defense would have been significantly improved with Curry and Brown.

shitgoose 04-27-2009 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5718765)
Herm's defense would have been significantly improved with Curry and Brown.

ROFL just like it got soooo much better with the addition of Dorsey, Flowers, and Carr. Not to mention Gun running the D.......

Dave Lane 04-27-2009 11:06 AM

God how I long for the days of Herm and Carl

LaChapelle 04-27-2009 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5718741)
yep... I think he said at some point that Thigpen would be the QB in 09 before he was fired.

He may not have pulled the trigger for Sanchez. Probably Jeff Garcia or some washed up Carl could drum up.

kcbubb 04-27-2009 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 5718783)
God how I long for the days of Herm and Carl

Never said that. But I do think the 4-3 is a better fit for the current roster. and Curry and Brown would have fit well. And I really believe that those guys would have been the picks for Herm and Carl.

Lex Luthors 04-27-2009 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 5718806)
Never said that. But I do think the 4-3 is a better fit for the current roster. and Curry and Brown would have fit well. And I really believe that those guys would have been the picks for Herm and Carl.

Good idea. Let's build our defense around a roster that went 2-14 last year.

Who cares who Herm and Carl would have picked?

kcbubb 04-27-2009 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lex Luthor (Post 5718860)
Good idea. Let's build our defense around a roster that went 2-14 last year.

Who cares who Herm and Carl would have picked?

hey.. it's just conjecture. I think that is the way it would played out. And the way the hand was dealt, and with Carl and Herm's likely preferences, it could have been a good draft for the chiefs.

the pioli draft may turn out well. I just don't see it right now. hopefully Tyson is the 2nd coming of Seymour.

htismaqe 04-27-2009 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lex Luthor (Post 5718860)
Good idea. Let's build our defense around a roster that went 2-14 last year.

Who cares who Herm and Carl would have picked?

Curry would have single-handedly saved the defense, the team, and the city of KC!

HemiEd 04-27-2009 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaChapelle (Post 5718802)
He may not have pulled the trigger for Sanchez. Probably Jeff Garcia or some washed up Carl could drum up.

A USC QB for Carl Peterson? I can almost guarantee you he wouldn't have even considered it.

dirk digler 04-27-2009 11:39 AM

I think they Chiefs would have still tried to trade for Cassel and if that didn't work out we would have drafted Sanchez.

Clark stated many times at the beginning of the off-season how he wants a franchise QB

Fish 04-27-2009 11:40 AM

Curry would have built a rolling roof for free over the stadiums out of recycled aluminum cans if we signed him. I can't believe they didn't take that into consideration...

kcbubb 04-27-2009 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5718704)
No way to tell. This thread is moot.

I think we can take a pretty good guess that Curry would have been the first pick especially since Herm said it on espn and Brown looks pretty likely with the 2nd round pick with the need for a pass rusher in the 4-3.

Herm said he needed to fill about 5 holes in one of his last press conference, so you can take some pretty good guesses to which picks fill those obvious holes that Herm had in mind.

Ceej 04-27-2009 11:47 AM

I would actually see them taking Crabtree over Curry for some reason.

Gravedigger 04-27-2009 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shitgoose (Post 5718779)
ROFL just like it got soooo much better with the addition of Dorsey, Flowers, and Carr. Not to mention Gun running the D.......

I think the defense did get alot better with Flowers and Carr, in a dissapointing season they were some of the bright spots. And I think that he has a good point, Curry would've been better than any of our LB's except for Pat Thomas of course... let me tell ya seeing on ESPN's coverage that our Key Departures that Pat Thomas was one of them made me laugh every time.

Not to mention if Herm and Carl would've stayed Gun would've been the scape goat. Guaranteed.

CaliforniaChief 04-27-2009 12:06 PM

This thread is eerily reminiscent of when the Israelites wanted to go back to Egypt after a miracle had sprung them.

googlegoogle 04-27-2009 12:23 PM

Everette Brown has question marks.

shitgoose 04-27-2009 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravedigger (Post 5718957)
I think the defense did get alot better with Flowers and Carr, in a dissapointing season they were some of the bright spots. And I think that he has a good point, Curry would've been better than any of our LB's except for Pat Thomas of course... let me tell ya seeing on ESPN's coverage that our Key Departures that Pat Thomas was one of them made me laugh every time.

Not to mention if Herm and Carl would've stayed Gun would've been the scape goat. Guaranteed.

2008 Defensive Stats:
Average Points Allowed Per Game: 27.5
Average Yards Allowed Per Game: 393.2
Total Sacks: 10 (NFL Record)
Ranking: 29th in the league

Talent wise we may have improved but statistically it was probably one of the worst defensive unit to be fielded by KC.

htismaqe 04-27-2009 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 5718918)
I would actually see them taking Crabtree over Curry for some reason.

Big 12. Carl was great at that and taking guys from UCLA.

beach tribe 04-27-2009 12:56 PM

Who gives a fuq?

Frankie 04-27-2009 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5718896)
I think they Chiefs would have still tried to trade for Cassel and if that didn't work out we would have drafted Sanchez.

Clark stated many times at the beginning of the off-season how he wants a franchise QB

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 5718893)
A USC QB for Carl Peterson? I can almost guarantee you he wouldn't have even considered it.

There's your answer dd.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.