ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football "Jesus" Is Disappointing... (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=218780)

Marco Polo 11-24-2009 09:35 PM

"Jesus" Is Disappointing...
 
From Rotoworld:

Rookie SLB Aaron Curry has been removed from the Seahawks' nickel package.
Now only a mere early-down linebacker, Curry is barely averaging five tackles a game. The No. 4 overall pick hasn't been nearly as effective as No. 16 overall pick Brian Cushing for the Texans. Seahawks GM Tim Ruskell should be kicking himself for drafting Curry over Eugene Monroe in April.

Mr. Laz 11-24-2009 09:44 PM

wow ... cool, feel a little better about Jackson now.

still early though for all the rookies

pr_capone 11-24-2009 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6292317)
wow ... cool, feel a little better about Jackson now.

still early though for all the rookies

I don't. Jackson should already be playing at an all pro level.

What does he think he is playing??? Patty cake?!?!?

Mr. Laz 11-24-2009 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 6292324)
I don't. Jackson should already be playing at an all pro level.

What does he think he is playing??? Patty cake?!?!?

i hope that's sarcasm.

Dlineman often struggle their first year

OnTheWarpath15 11-24-2009 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6292328)
i hope that's sarcasm.

Dlineman often struggle their first year

Hell, most rookies struggle their 1st year regardless of position.

I think the guys like Matt Ryan and Cushing gives fans an unrealistic view of the adjustment period from CFB to the NFL.

pr_capone 11-24-2009 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6292328)
i hope that's sarcasm.

Dlineman often struggle their first year

Heaping amounts of sarcasm. :)

Mr. Laz 11-24-2009 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 6292335)
Heaping amounts of sarcasm. :)

i thought it probably was but you can never be certain. :)

DaneMcCloud 11-24-2009 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6292331)
Hell, most rookies struggle their 1st year regardless of position.

I think the guys like Matt Ryan and Cushing gives fans an unrealistic view of the adjustment period from CFB to the NFL.

Cushing, Maualuga and Matthews are all exceptions to rule.

It's not surprising that Curry is struggling because he was way overrated.

OnTheWarpath15 11-24-2009 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6292340)
Cushing, Maualuga and Matthews are all exceptions to rule.

It's not surprising that Curry is struggling because he was way overrated.

You know who's been absolutely ****ing stellar, and is getting absolutely no publicity for it?

James Laurinaitis.

DaneMcCloud 11-24-2009 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6292344)
You know who's been absolutely ****ing stellar, and is getting absolutely no publicity for it?

James Laurinaitis.

Yeah, I know. Although I believe it was Peter King that gave him props the other day.

Buehler445 11-24-2009 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6292344)
You know who's been absolutely ****ing stellar, and is getting absolutely no publicity for it?

James Laurinaitis.

Interesting. I don't even know who he plays for. I think the kid is a machine, but had questions about his speed.

DaneMcCloud 11-24-2009 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 6292353)
Interesting. I don't even know who he plays for. I think the kid is a machine, but had questions about his speed.

Rams

OnTheWarpath15 11-24-2009 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6292351)
Yeah, I know. Although I believe it was Peter King that gave him props the other day.

I must have missed it.

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-24-2009 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6292340)
Cushing, Maualuga and Matthews are all exceptions to rule.

It's not surprising that Curry is struggling because he was way overrated.

Man I'm glad we passed on him. That's too much intensity. And for God's sake, his number was and still is 58; no good portent there whatsoever.

DaneMcCloud 11-24-2009 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6292381)
Man I'm glad we passed on him. That's too much intensity. And for God's sake, his number was and still is 58; no good portent there whatsoever.

The only reason Rey slipped to the second round is that just two weeks before the draft, there were rumors floated that he was only a "Two Down" player.

JFC, I wish those same rumors would have applied to Tyson Jackson.

OnTheWarpath15 11-24-2009 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6292390)
The only reason Rey slipped to the second round is that just two weeks before the draft, there were rumors floated that he was only a "Two Down" player.

JFC, I wish those same rumors would have applied to Tyson Jackson.

Why?

Pioli would have taken him anyway, hell Jackson's only playing two downs now.

Psyko Tek 11-24-2009 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6292328)
i hope that's sarcasm.

Dlineman often struggle their first year


specially if they go to KC
stilll waiting for dorsey to be the "dominate" figure he was supposed to be

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-24-2009 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6292390)
The only reason Rey slipped to the second round is that just two weeks before the draft, there were rumors floated that he was only a "Two Down" player.

JFC, I wish those same rumors would have applied to Tyson Jackson.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6292391)
Why?

Pioli would have taken him anyway, hell Jackson's only playing two downs now.

Jackson was projected at 16 wasn't he?

Reerun_KC 11-24-2009 10:50 PM

Who cares anyway?

OnTheWarpath15 11-24-2009 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6292399)
Jackson was projected at 16 wasn't he?

Somewhere like that. I'd seen him as high as 12, as low as 20.

No one even considered him going early until Rick Gosselin's mock came out the night before the draft.

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-24-2009 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6292401)
Who cares anyway?

Who cares about anything really?

GoHuge 11-24-2009 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6292410)
Who cares about anything really?

Not I said the mouse.
Posted via Mobile Device

DaneMcCloud 11-24-2009 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6292391)
Why?

Pioli would have taken him anyway, hell Jackson's only playing two downs now.

LMAO

I know

88TG88 11-24-2009 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6292410)
Who cares about anything really?

lol

What a crazy offseason that was.

Thig Lyfe 11-25-2009 12:54 AM

Didn't Curry get off to a hot start?

KCrockaholic 11-25-2009 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SportsRacer (Post 6292557)
Didn't Curry get off to a hot start?

He was off to an o.k. start, doing decent for a rook. He has had a tough time in coverage lately though. But he has consistently made plays behind the LOS. Other than that, I can't say much. He's been a rookie. Just like any rookie, you have to give him atleast his rookie year and part of his 2nd year to show his full abilities. He's shown flashes of what he can do. Now he just needs to be consistent and quit trying so hard to make every play.

DaneMcCloud 11-25-2009 01:02 AM

Where is Bdeg?

He was insistent that the Chiefs take Everette Brown at #3 overall.

Taco John 11-25-2009 01:21 AM

I don't care what they may say, I don't care what they may do...

BossChief 11-25-2009 01:25 AM

Dane,

I didnt really spend a lot of time on the board around the time before the draft, I just got the basic feeling that Orakpo was not gonna be the pick. What were the key points as to why the board disliked him so much?

DaneMcCloud 11-25-2009 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6292579)
Dane,

I didnt really spend a lot of time on the board around the time before the draft, I just got the basic feeling that Orakpo was not gonna be the pick. What were the key points as to why the board disliked him so much?

I think (and you can verify in the Draft forum) it's because first off, he was from Texas. Texas players haven't translated well to the NFL lately under Mack Brown. They "maxed out" in college.

Secondly, there was the question of his bulk and his overall ability.

But, that's going off of memory on a late night.

BossChief 11-25-2009 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6292582)
I think (and you can verify in the Draft forum) it's because first off, he was from Texas. Texas players haven't translated well to the NFL lately under Mack Brown. They "maxed out" in college.

Secondly, there was the question of his bulk and his overall ability.

But, that's going off of memory on a late night.

fair enough. I just really didnt want to have to sort through a thousand posts that are nothing but parrots repeating what they heard about him over and over. I appreciate it.

KCrockaholic 11-25-2009 01:44 AM

Mecca had a funny quote about Orakpo..I think it was something like... "I'd rather wipe my ass with a toilet brush than draft Brian Orakpo"....Maybe I'm incorrect, but I know I'm close. He hated Orakpo because he was from Texas. I can't bash Mecca to much though. I think every year somebody is waaay off about a certain prospect and other times guys are pin-point on the money when making predictions about players.

Pioli Zombie 11-25-2009 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 6292324)
I don't. Jackson should already be playing at an all pro level.

What does he think he is playing??? Patty cake?!?!?

Jackson is playing every bit as good as guys like Richard Seymour were playing after 10 games. He and MacGee will be just fine.
Posted via Mobile Device

beach tribe 11-25-2009 06:47 AM

I think Jackson has looked pretty good for a 1st year D-linemen.

Better than Jesus Curry. A 2 down LB.

Deberg_1990 11-25-2009 07:01 AM

Ty Jack is going to be a solid player.

But is he going to be worthy of overall #3 money? Thats the question.

The 09 draft is looking sort of weak overall.

Demonpenz 11-25-2009 07:24 AM

Orakpu seemed like another Hali great motor good production in college, but not the physical freak to get ALOT better. Mecca projected him to be a LDE not good enough to be a pick that high. He reminded me too much of mike mamula. Good build but already maxed out weight wise with his frame and play before he got to the nfl

Demonpenz 11-25-2009 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 6292678)
Ty Jack is going to be a solid player.

But is he going to be worthy of overall #3 money? Thats the question.

The 09 draft is looking sort of weak overall.

the only question should be is he going to be a solid player. Why would you worry if he was #3 in the draft we are near the cap floor.

wild1 11-25-2009 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demonpenz (Post 6292703)
the only question should be is he going to be a solid player. Why would you worry if he was #3 in the draft we are near the cap floor.

I said this in another thread, but if Jackson sticks around and starts for his entire career here and is just average to above average at the position, that will be fine.

The picks that turn out to be unspectacular but "OK" aren't the kind that really hurt your franchise, it's the picks like JaMarcus Russell that will do that, the ones where you get absolutely nothing. That is what will bury a team eventually.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-25-2009 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6292390)
The only reason Rey slipped to the second round is that just two weeks before the draft, there were rumors floated that he was only a "Two Down" player.

JFC, I wish those same rumors would have applied to Tyson Jackson.

Sorry, but, other than about conduct or off the field issues.... 'rumors' don't make a guy fall in the draft.

Every team spends millions of dollars on scouting.... a 'rumor' isn't dropping someone.

Just because a 'rumor' makes draft magazine readers think he should drop a round, doesn't mean that people who actually get paid to evaluate talent are affected by it at all.

MOhillbilly 11-25-2009 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6292591)
I think every year somebody is waaay off about a certain prospect and other times guys are pin-point on the money when making predictions about players.

ya think?

El Jefe 11-25-2009 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6292344)
You know who's been absolutely ****ing stellar, and is getting absolutely no publicity for it?

James Laurinaitis.

Yep, I was advocating us picking him in the draft all season.

Pablo 11-25-2009 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6292344)
You know who's been absolutely ****ing stellar, and is getting absolutely no publicity for it?

James Laurinaitis.

You'll generally get no publicity for anything if you play for the Rams.

Chiefnj2 11-25-2009 09:23 AM

Laurinaitis is a prime example of a kid who is a good football player for years on the field, but then he slips because of size/timing issues.

The first 4 defensive players are all underwhelming at this point - Jackson, Curry, Raji and Maybin. Hell, Maybin is third string and barely gets playing time.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-25-2009 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 6292720)
I said this in another thread, but if Jackson sticks around and starts for his entire career here and is just average to above average at the position, that will be fine.

The picks that turn out to be unspectacular but "OK" aren't the kind that really hurt your franchise, it's the picks like JaMarcus Russell that will do that, the ones where you get absolutely nothing. That is what will bury a team eventually.


This is what so many fans just don't get. Football is a team sport. You have to have good players at all the positions to be a good team. If Tyson Jackson is a good starter for the next 12 years... then the Chiefs were smart in drafting him.

Of course the problem will be if the Chiefs get three years into this and then go back to a 4-3 and he has to move inside and then struggles.

I just assume that the Chiefs will stick with the 3-4, given Pioli's history.

Pablo 11-25-2009 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6292884)
Laurinaitis is a prime example of a kid who is a good football player for years on the field, but then he slips because of size/timing issues.

Same deal with Flowers really. Pretty much an undersized stud at VT, with an average 40 and good ball skills.

And he slipped to us....hells yeah.

swayy07 11-25-2009 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 6292324)
I don't. Jackson should already be playing at an all pro level.

What does he think he is playing??? Patty cake?!?!?

no he is playin caken panta

Mr. Laz 11-25-2009 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swayy07 (Post 6293077)
no he is playin caken panta

fail

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-25-2009 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 6292641)
Jackson is playing every bit as good as guys like Richard Seymour were playing after 10 games. He and MacGee will be just fine.
Posted via Mobile Device

Whew! Well that's a load off my mind!

milkman 11-25-2009 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6292770)
Sorry, but, other than about conduct or off the field issues.... 'rumors' don't make a guy fall in the draft.

Every team spends millions of dollars on scouting.... a 'rumor' isn't dropping someone.

Just because a 'rumor' makes draft magazine readers think he should drop a round, doesn't mean that people who actually get paid to evaluate talent are affected by it at all.

Actually, it came out just before the draft that scouts thought he was just a two down player, and there was also something about an off field issue, though I can't remember exactly what that was

DaneMcCloud 11-25-2009 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6292770)
Sorry, but, other than about conduct or off the field issues.... 'rumors' don't make a guy fall in the draft.

Every team spends millions of dollars on scouting.... a 'rumor' isn't dropping someone.

Just because a 'rumor' makes draft magazine readers think he should drop a round, doesn't mean that people who actually get paid to evaluate talent are affected by it at all.

Sorry, as usual, you are ill-informed and commenting (as usual) about something you know nothing about.

ohiobronco2 11-25-2009 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoLJ (Post 6292869)
Yep, I was advocating us picking him in the draft all season.

Why, he plays in the Big slow. :D He was such an accomplished football player in college, I knew he would be special in the NFL. He has great instincts and slightly above average athleticism.

Chiefnj2 11-25-2009 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6294824)
Actually, it came out just before the draft that scouts thought he was just a two down player, and there was also something about an off field issue, though I can't remember exactly what that was

USC played him as a two down player.

ArrowheadMagic 11-25-2009 09:58 PM

I was high on Curry. From what little I have seen this year of the Seahawks, I thought he played well. As disappointing as they have been, is coaching part of the problem?

SenselessChiefsFan 11-25-2009 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6294824)
Actually, it came out just before the draft that scouts thought he was just a two down player, and there was also something about an off field issue, though I can't remember exactly what that was

I am not saying that the scouts didn't believe that. But, if so, they evaluated it for themselves.... they didn't hear some rumor and then suddenly drop the guy on the draft board.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-25-2009 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6294829)
Sorry, as usual, you are ill-informed and commenting (as usual) about something you know nothing about.

Happens around here a lot, otherwise, you wouldn't post.

You are still moronic if you think a scout is dropping him on the draft board based on a rumor that other scouts think he might not be an everydown player. A scout would view that as an opportunity.

Scouts aren't dumba$$ fans on message boards.... they actually know what they are looking at.... and aren't reading some draft magazine and regurgitating what it said trying to act like experts.

KCrockaholic 11-25-2009 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadMagic (Post 6294915)
I was high on Curry. From what little I have seen this year of the Seahawks, I thought he played well. As disappointing as they have been, is coaching part of the problem?

Coaching could be part of the problem, but I just think Curry is a guy that is going to have to take a year to be a top 10 or so LB. Give him a little time. Ernie Sims has sucked this year btw.

DaneMcCloud 11-26-2009 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6294980)
Happens around here a lot, otherwise, you wouldn't post.

You are still moronic if you think a scout is dropping him on the draft board based on a rumor that other scouts think he might not be an everydown player. A scout would view that as an opportunity.

Scouts aren't dumba$$ fans on message boards.... they actually know what they are looking at.... and aren't reading some draft magazine and regurgitating what it said trying to act like experts.

You're a ****ing dipshit.

Rey was projected as a Top 15 player in nearly every mock until about two weeks before, when Mayock floated the idea that Rey was only a two down player.

He dropped to the top of the second because most GM's, like you, are ****ing gutless ****ing pussies.

Tell me how Rey's a 2 down 'backer now, Senseless.

DaneMcCloud 11-26-2009 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6295090)
Coaching could be part of the problem, but I just think Curry is a guy that is going to have to take a year to be a top 10 or so LB. Give him a little time. Ernie Sims has sucked this year btw.


Curry received waaaaaay too much media hype. Holmgren left the Seahawks in major disarray with shit for talent.

Poor decisions lead to a poor football team.

Curry's just a guy and nothing special. Certainly not an impact football player.

DBOSHO 11-26-2009 12:33 AM

Sure glad we drafted tyson instead of this guy. We might not have had the pleasant suprise of tamba

DaneMcCloud 11-26-2009 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 6295204)
Sure glad we drafted tyson instead of this guy. We might not have had the pleasant suprise of tamba

.

BossChief 11-26-2009 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 6295204)
Sure glad we drafted tyson instead of this guy. We might not have had the pleasant suprise of tamba

Tamba plays a completely different position...I dont get it.

greg63 11-26-2009 01:19 AM

For a second I thought this was a thread best suited for DC. :p

SenselessChiefsFan 11-26-2009 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6295209)
Tamba plays a completely different position...I dont get it.

True, but had the Chiefs draft him, they may have let him play OLB. He has played well behind the line of scrimage this year, and he has struggled with coverage.... which is the opposite of what I expected.

That said, he is a rookie and linebacker is one of the hardest positions to play on a defense.... and it really depends on the DC on how hard it is to play.

The more complex and linebacker oriented the scheme, the harder it is.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-26-2009 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6295195)
You're a ****ing dipshit.

Rey was projected as a Top 15 player in nearly every mock until about two weeks before, when Mayock floated the idea that Rey was only a two down player.

He dropped to the top of the second because most GM's, like you, are ****ing gutless ****ing pussies.

Tell me how Rey's a 2 down 'backer now, Senseless.

I'm not saying he is. I am saying that the GM's aren't going to listed to Mayock and then suddenly drop him on their boards.

Do you even realize how much of a dumbass you are? Do you even realize how stupid you sound?

Franchises do their own homework. If Mayock said that, he probably got that information from a league source.

I am not saying that mistakes aren't made, but they are made based on their own work... not some freaking 'rumor' by a draft analyst.

Your stupidity is amazing. I am literally stunned that you have this opinion. I have read some really dumbass stuff on this board.... some of it, I wrote myself.

But, the theory that a GM, a scout, or anyone other than a fan would be swayed by Mayock, Kiper or any other draft 'expert'... is asinine.

Happy Thanksgiving.... I am thankful for you Dane.... because on bad day's.... I can think.... at least I'm not Dane. Thanks.... there are days I need that.

Tiger's Fan 11-26-2009 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6295455)
I'm not saying he is. I am saying that the GM's aren't going to listed to Mayock and then suddenly drop him on their boards.

Do you even realize how much of a dumbass you are? Do you even realize how stupid you sound?

Franchises do their own homework. If Mayock said that, he probably got that information from a league source.

I am not saying that mistakes aren't made, but they are made based on their own work... not some freaking 'rumor' by a draft analyst.

Your stupidity is amazing. I am literally stunned that you have this opinion. I have read some really dumbass stuff on this board.... some of it, I wrote myself.

But, the theory that a GM, a scout, or anyone other than a fan would be swayed by Mayock, Kiper or any other draft 'expert'... is asinine.

Happy Thanksgiving.... I am thankful for you Dane.... because on bad day's.... I can think.... at least I'm not Dane. Thanks.... there are days I need that.

lol rep for truth.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.