ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Is it starting to become pathetic how Patriots-like we're trying to be? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221264)

TigerPig 01-06-2010 10:12 PM

Is it starting to become pathetic how Patriots-like we're trying to be?
 
I mean, do other teams and analysts think, "They are so smart for going after Weis, Cassel, and (possibly) Crennel, to try and bring that winning attitude to KC!" Or are they thinking, "How pathetic, they can't even make their own decisions on coaching and are just trying to copy New England as much as possible!"

Its pretty obvious we're ripping off the Patriots' philosophy. We're not copying it, we're literally trying to take the exact personnel and players they had and win with them here. Is this a smart, tactful thing? Or a sad and pathetic thing?

FTR I don't see a problem with it. If we start winning, they can change Cassel's name to Tom Brady and put Haley in a huge hoodie for all I care.

wild1 01-06-2010 10:13 PM

We're hiring people who have had success in the NFL before.

Who would you propose we hire instead that is out there looking for work..?

KC kid 01-06-2010 10:13 PM

Every post of yours I have read is pathetic.

Hoover 01-06-2010 10:13 PM

There are worse franchises to emulate

RedThat 01-06-2010 10:14 PM

I think its smart. Nothing wrong with hiring people who have a great wealth of knowledge and experience and success to go along with that.

Brock 01-06-2010 10:14 PM

By my count this is the third time the Chiefs have tried to ape a more successful franchise.

Dante84 01-06-2010 10:15 PM

All I ask is, "What would another team do in the same situation?"

- Pioli? Hell yes they would.
- Weis? Well, with a rook head coach, some experience would be nice. Same system, too.
- Crennel? Again, who else would we get? Clancy sucks, and Romeo runs the 3-4.

Also, the guys have multiple rings and know how to get it done.

I get the whole patriots rip off thing, but honestly, its the right move, given the situations.

TigerPig 01-06-2010 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC kid (Post 6417460)
Every post of yours I have read is pathetic.

That's right, stay positive! :D

There's a lot of love in this room...

Mama Hip Rockets 01-06-2010 10:15 PM

It's much cooler than the Denver Browncos, I think.

OnTheWarpath15 01-06-2010 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC kid (Post 6417460)
Every post of yours I have read is pathetic.

Says the guy that wouldn't pay Josh Cribbs because he's worried about our "limited funds" going into an uncapped season.

ROFL

Johnny Vegas 01-06-2010 10:17 PM

yeah it does. I'd rather have a Raiders like team where nobody is on the same page.

threebag 01-06-2010 10:17 PM

MOSS in 2011







PASS!!!!

RustShack 01-06-2010 10:17 PM

They probably thought the Patriots were pathetic when the signed all the former Browns/Jets back in the early 2000's. Or do they think that was smart?

TrebMaxx 01-06-2010 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerPig (Post 6417456)
I mean, do other teams and analysts think, "They are so smart for going after Weiss, Cassel, and (possibly) Crennel, to try and bring that winning attitude to KC!" Or are they thinking, "How pathetic, they can't even make their own decisions on coaching and are just trying to copy New England as much as possible!"

Its pretty obvious we're ripping off the Patriots' philosophy. We're not copying it, we're literally trying to take the exact personnel and players they had and win with them here. Is this a smart, tactful thing? Or a sad and pathetic thing?

FTR I don't see a problem with it. If we start winning, they can change Cassel's name to Tom Brady and put Haley in a huge hoodie for all I care.

:doh!:

SPATCH 01-06-2010 10:18 PM

FRAG THE n00b

Mr. Laz 01-06-2010 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerPig (Post 6417472)
That's right, stay positive! :D

There's a lot of love in this room...

you mean as positive as your OP?

BIG K 01-06-2010 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerPig (Post 6417456)
I mean, do other teams and analysts think, "They are so smart for going after Weiss, Cassel, and (possibly) Crennel, to try and bring that winning attitude to KC!" Or are they thinking, "How pathetic, they can't even make their own decisions on coaching and are just trying to copy New England as much as possible!"

Its pretty obvious we're ripping off the Patriots' philosophy. We're not copying it, we're literally trying to take the exact personnel and players they had and win with them here. Is this a smart, tactful thing? Or a sad and pathetic thing?

FTR I don't see a problem with it. If we start winning, they can change Cassel's name to Tom Brady and put Haley in a huge hoodie for all I care.

Yes, in a new regime, it always pathetic to surround yourself with people who have superbowl rings. Whether or not, people will call this the patsification. Oh well, I would rather the Chiefs surround themselves with proven winners than the slapdick coaching staff they put together last year.

It's an improvement over last year......

Mr. Plow 01-06-2010 10:26 PM

God forbid....don't let us become like the Patriots and all the championships. Let's pick a better team to model after....maybe the Browns? Raiders?

Galileo Humpkins 01-06-2010 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerPig (Post 6417472)
There's a lot of love in this room...

Every thread ends in a lovesome orgy.

Hope you brought lubricant.

LaChapelle 01-06-2010 10:27 PM

Don't let the KU fans get you down
Mr Brown

Reaper16 01-06-2010 10:28 PM

Aping the Patriots would be fine if we could acquire the one and only piece that made it all work.

BossChief 01-06-2010 10:29 PM

we could do worse...

Titty Meat 01-06-2010 10:30 PM

These are nice moves but like I've said I've seen this dance before. If this organization wants to be good again it's simply going to have to do a better job drafting.

TigerPig 01-06-2010 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6417491)
you mean as positive as your OP?

My post is asking whether or not people think it is positive or negative. I see it as a great thing! It makes me really happy to see the Chiefs bringing in someone that I wholeheartedly trust will make things better. That hasn't happened very often. I didn't even do that with Vermeil. I did with Pioli, and now I am with Weiss.

I'm super positive. I just hope they can keep going. They could pick a million more ex-pats (lol), just as long as it brings in great coaches.

But I KNOW some people around here will disagree, which is why I asked.

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2010 10:38 PM

Who gives a **** what "analysts" think?

Charlie Weis is a damn good offensive coordinator. Period. He'll bring so much to the Chiefs offensively that I would not be shocked to see us in the Top Ten next year.

Offense is all about play design. Cassel has limitations (as does every QB) but I fully expect Weis to design plays that will limit his deficiencies while creating plays that make him far more efficient.

Haley had some good ideas but he was stretched way too thin. He did a lot of stupid shit because there was no one around with a pedigree he respected to keep him in check. I guarantee that all those stupid, inappropriate trick plays and shit like trying a fake punt on your own 28 while only down one score has come to an end.

I'm shocked that anyone, ANYONE, can find a negative in his hiring.

Micjones 01-06-2010 10:40 PM

Guess I'm weird...

I care more about the success these coaches have had in their NFL careers that I do who their previous employers were. Name for me, if you would, a better Offensive Coordinator candidate going into the 2010 NFL regular season. Don't worry...I'll wait.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-06-2010 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6417468)
By my count this is the third time the Chiefs have tried to ape a more successful franchise.

Funny how no one seems to recognize this when it's so ****ing obvious.

jAZ 01-06-2010 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6417534)
Who gives a **** what "analysts" think?

Charlie Weis is a damn good offensive coordinator. Period. He'll bring so much to the Chiefs offensively that I would not be shocked to see us in the Top Ten next year.

Offense is all about play design. Cassel has limitations (as does every QB) but I fully expect Weis to design plays that will limit his deficiencies while creating plays that make him far more efficient.

Haley had some good ideas but he was stretched way too thin. He did a lot of stupid shit because there was no one around with a pedigree he respected to keep him in check. I guarantee that all those stupid, inappropriate trick plays and shit like trying a fake punt on your own 28 while only down one score has come to an end.

I'm shocked that anyone, ANYONE, can find a negative in his hiring.

Jason Whitlock hasn't posted his article yet.

OnTheWarpath15 01-06-2010 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6417540)
Guess I'm weird...

I care more about the success these coaches have had in their NFL careers that I do who their previous employers were. Name for me, if you would, a better Offensive Coordinator candidate going into the 2010 NFL regular season. Don't worry...I'll wait.

Considering hardly anyone has been fired, Mic, that's pretty hard to say.

And that's coming from someone who's generally happy with the Weis hire.

TheGuardian 01-06-2010 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerPig (Post 6417456)
I mean, do other teams and analysts think, "They are so smart for going after Weiss, Cassel, and (possibly) Crennel, to try and bring that winning attitude to KC!" Or are they thinking, "How pathetic, they can't even make their own decisions on coaching and are just trying to copy New England as much as possible!"

Its pretty obvious we're ripping off the Patriots' philosophy. We're not copying it, we're literally trying to take the exact personnel and players they had and win with them here. Is this a smart, tactful thing? Or a sad and pathetic thing?

FTR I don't see a problem with it. If we start winning, they can change Cassel's name to Tom Brady and put Haley in a huge hoodie for all I care.

Damn you're a pathetically stupid MF'er. Find a grease fire to throw yourself into.

OnTheWarpath15 01-06-2010 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6417553)
Damn you're a pathetically stupid MF'er. Find a grease fire to throw yourself into.

Jesus Christ, lay off the juice. He's not trying to stir shit, he's literally asking a ****ing question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerPig (Post 6417525)
My post is asking whether or not people think it is positive or negative. I see it as a great thing! It makes me really happy to see the Chiefs bringing in someone that I wholeheartedly trust will make things better. That hasn't happened very often. I didn't even do that with Vermeil. I did with Pioli, and now I am with Weiss.

I'm super positive. I just hope they can keep going. They could pick a million more ex-pats (lol), just as long as it brings in great coaches.

But I KNOW some people around here will disagree, which is why I asked.


DaneMcCloud 01-06-2010 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6417548)
Funny how no one seems to recognize this when it's so ****ing obvious.

I'm very happy with the Weis hire.

But what you're talking about is completely different and IMO, comes from the lack of guidance and mandates from ownership.

With that said, I can't imagine how the Chiefs wouldn't have a potent offense with Weis in control.

Red Dawg 01-06-2010 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6417512)
Aping the Patriots would be fine if we could acquire the one and only piece that made it all work.

If we get Romey we will have 3 of 5 that made their SB teams work. Bill and Brady would be the best but they have not won anything since Romey and Chuck left them. This is a good move.

Micjones 01-06-2010 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6417551)
Considering hardly anyone has been fired, Mic, that's pretty hard to say.

And that's coming from someone who's generally happy with the Weis hire.

You have to consider a couple things...
1. No Offensive Coordinator is going to make a lateral move. We'd have to be surveying OC's who are on the outs with their current franchises or looking at top flight position coaches in line for bigger jobs next season.

2. Even when considering all of the above, I'm not sure there's a better candidate available to this team.

All things considered... There's not a better candidate out there.
You can call this chasing after Patriot success all you want, but in the end if he's the best man for the job. Who cares?

Honestly... Who's a better man for the job?

TheGuardian 01-06-2010 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6417559)
Jesus Christ, lay off the juice. He's not trying to stir shit, he's literally asking a ****ing question.

He's not really asking a question you dumbass, he is stirring shit with his "question". Damn you're a ****ing reerun.

luv 01-06-2010 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerPig (Post 6417472)
That's right, stay positive! :D

There's a lot of love in this room...

What an emotional, optimistic observation.

DeezNutz 01-06-2010 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6417563)
You have to consider a couple things...
1. No Offensive Coordinator is going to make a lateral move. We'd have to be surveying OC's who are on the outs with their current franchises or looking at top flight position coaches in line for bigger jobs next season.

2. Even when considering all of the above, I'm not sure there's a better candidate available to this team.

All things considered... There's not a better candidate out there.
You can call this chasing after Patriot success all you want, but in the end if he's the best man for the job. Who cares?

Honestly... Who's a better man for the job?

I think this is the avenue with the most potential for the most success, but would likely be a disaster with a n00b HC.

The hire would just have to be a tremendous one.

OnTheWarpath15 01-06-2010 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6417563)
You have to consider a couple things...
1. No Offensive Coordinator is going to make a lateral move. We'd have to be surveying OC's who are on the outs with their current franchises or looking at top flight position coaches in line for bigger jobs next season.

2. Even when considering all of the above, I'm not sure there's a better candidate available to this team.

All things considered... There's not a better candidate out there.
You can call this chasing after Patriot success all you want, but in the end if he's the best man for the job. Who cares?

Honestly... Who's a better man for the job?

I can't tell you who would be better because no one else has been fired. No one else is available at the moment.

And again, I'm happy with the hire.

OnTheWarpath15 01-06-2010 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6417564)
He's not really asking a question you dumbass, he is stirring shit with his "question". Damn you're a ****ing reerun.

A mind-reader, and a backup LB.

Damn, you're overflowing with talent.

RealSNR 01-06-2010 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6417468)
By my count this is the third time the Chiefs have tried to ape a more successful franchise.

Rams, Patriots.... who's the third franchise?

Brock 01-06-2010 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 6417574)
Rams, Patriots.... who's the third franchise?

49ers

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-06-2010 10:52 PM

49ers

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2010 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6417563)
You have to consider a couple things...
1. No Offensive Coordinator is going to make a lateral move.

Kyle Shanahan just made a lateral move

FAX 01-06-2010 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6417468)
By my count this is the third time the Chiefs have tried to ape a more successful franchise.

Well posted.

Plus, one could say that the decision to hire Marty meant the Eggos were emulating us. Except for the embarrassing talent and pitiful execution, that is.

FAX

RedThat 01-06-2010 10:56 PM

Just curious when did the Chiefs try to emulate the 49ers?

BIG K 01-06-2010 10:57 PM

[QUOTE=DaneMcCloud;6417534]Who gives a **** what "analysts" think?

Charlie Weis is a damn good offensive coordinator. Period. He'll bring so much to the Chiefs offensively that I would not be shocked to see us in the Top Ten next year.

Offense is all about play design. Cassel has limitations (as does every QB) but I fully expect Weis to design plays that will limit his deficiencies while creating plays that make him far more efficient.

Haley had some good ideas but he was stretched way too thin. He did a lot of stupid shit because there was no one around with a pedigree he respected to keep him in check. I guarantee that all those stupid, inappropriate trick plays and shit like trying a fake punt on your own 28 while only down one score has come to an end.


Well Put! People here bitched that Haley fired Gan, then people bitched that Haley was calling the shots. Everyone agreed that an improvement needed to be made. Now people bitch because the improvement came from 'friendlies". Never mind he is a good coach, just damn the fact that the Chiefs know him.....

If I was taking on a project of huge magnitude, I would surround myself with people I knew that was capable of helping me out......

ChiefsCountry 01-06-2010 10:57 PM

I think the thing is trying to recapture lightining in a bottle more than likely isn't going to work especially when the main pieces of the lighting bolt aren't zapping.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-06-2010 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6417591)
Just curious when did the Chiefs try to emulate the 49ers?

1993 when we added Montana and moved to the WCO.

TigerPig 01-06-2010 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6417564)
He's not really asking a question you dumbass, he is stirring shit with his "question". Damn you're a ****ing reerun.

I was asking a question and not just stirring shit. I'm not a troll, I've been around enough MBs to know how they work. But you know better than me what I'm thinking. :)

If I was going to troll, I would have picked something other than a silly off question like what people will think of the organization. I would have said something like, "Why does Todd Haley suck" or, "Why do people think that (insert draft candidate here) is a good pick when he sucks?"

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 6417566)
What an emotional, optimistic observation.

Okay, you got me. But don't let anyone else know, or my street cred will be ruined. You hear me!?!

Micjones 01-06-2010 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6417569)
I can't tell you who would be better because no one else has been fired. No one else is available at the moment.

I'm considering quite a few coaches who aren't even available yet (and may not be) and I'm STILL not sure I can think of a BETTER candidate.

There are definitely some good ones I can name (Shanahan, Jackson, Chudzinski)...
BETTER? I'm not certain.

PastorMikH 01-06-2010 10:58 PM

I now I'm kinda sick of trying to be like the Detroit Lions. At least they are trying to copy a team that won/wins.

BIG K 01-06-2010 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6417591)
Just curious when did the Chiefs try to emulate the 49ers?

IIRC, Montanna, Bono, GrBack? West coast offense, though it was never a pure west coast offense. I could be wrong though....

:rolleyes:

TigerPig 01-06-2010 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6417582)
Kyle Shanahan just made a lateral move

This doesn't count!!! :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by PastorMikH (Post 6417599)
I now I'm kinda sick of trying to be like the Detroit Lions. At least they are trying to copy a team that won/wins.

Matt Millen can kiss my ass, and I don't even cheer for the Lions.


Instead of New England we need to emulate the 69 Chiefs. All we need is a legendary QB, Two of the greatest LBs ever, one monster of a DT, an amazing secondary, and Jan Stenarud

ChiefsCountry 01-06-2010 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PastorMikH (Post 6417599)
I now I'm kinda sick of trying to be like the Detroit Lions. At least they are trying to copy a team that won/wins.

Actually I wouldn't mind copying what Detroit has right now. They have the best young QB and a great football mind as a coach.

PastorMikH 01-06-2010 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6417605)
Actually I wouldn't mind copying what Detroit has right now. They have the best young QB and a great football mind as a coach.



You'd rather be 2-14?

luv 01-06-2010 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerPig (Post 6417596)
Okay, you got me. But don't let anyone else know, or my street cred will be ruined. You hear me!?!

What? I just got in from yelling TigerPig optimistically recognizes love from my balcony.

luv 01-06-2010 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG K (Post 6417602)
IIRC, Montanna, Bono, GrBack? West coast offense, though it was never a pure west coast offense. I could be wrong though....

:rolleyes:

Hey stranger!

luv 01-06-2010 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6417605)
Actually I wouldn't mind copying what Detroit has right now. They have the best young QB and a great football mind as a coach.

Stafford has proven to be one tough SOB.

salame 01-06-2010 11:04 PM

Last time I checked the patriots haven't won a super bowl since weis left

ChiefsCountry 01-06-2010 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PastorMikH (Post 6417619)
You'd rather be 2-14?

Considering they are more than likley getting Suh from Nebraska to add to Stafford and Calvin Johnson. Yeah I would. If they were smart they would have took Oher last year and Detroit would be on its way even more.

BIG K 01-06-2010 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 6417624)
Hey stranger!

What up girl?

Micjones 01-06-2010 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6417582)
Kyle Shanahan just made a lateral move

Yeah to coach for the guy who's balls he used to live in.
:rolleyes:

PastorMikH 01-06-2010 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6417632)
Considering they are more than likley getting Suh from Nebraska to add to Stafford and Calvin Johnson. Yeah I would. If they were smart they would have took Oher last year and Detroit would be on its way even more.




Detroit has had the top draft picks since Barry Sanders retired and no matter who's coach, they stay the same. I wonder how many top draft picks are praying at Detroit walks to the podium, "Please Lord, don't let them pick me."

As bad as things look here, I think we are headed in the right direction and I would be very surprised if Detroit were a contender before we are.

OnTheWarpath15 01-06-2010 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6417605)
Actually I wouldn't mind copying what Detroit has right now. They have the best young QB and a great football mind as a coach.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PastorMikH (Post 6417619)
You'd rather be 2-14?

They have the core pieces necessary to win a playoff game before we do, sadly enough.

ChiefsCountry 01-06-2010 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PastorMikH (Post 6417648)
As bad as things look here, I think we are headed in the right direction and I would be very surprised if Detroit were a contender before we are.

I don't because Detroit has something we don't have. They have a legit franchise QB, Stafford will lead them to a Super Bowl win pretty soon.

dirk digler 01-06-2010 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6417653)
They have the core pieces necessary to win a playoff game before we do, sadly enough.

No they don't

Pioli Zombie 01-06-2010 11:13 PM

Charlie Weis gets the most out of players. In 1994 he was New Englands TE coach and Ben Coates had his best season. In 1995 he was RB coach and Curtis Martin had a 1,400 yard rookie season. In 1996 he was WR coach and Terry Glenn had his best season. He brought order to the Patriot offense and got the most out of mediocre talent. He will get the most out Cassel, Bowe,Chambers, and Charles.
This is a great thing for KC.
Posted via Mobile Device

luv 01-06-2010 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG K (Post 6417635)
What up girl?

Watching it snow and worrying about getting to work in the AM. How's Cali?

Brock 01-06-2010 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6417658)
No they don't

Yes they do

PastorMikH 01-06-2010 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6417656)
I don't because Detroit has something we don't have. They have a legit franchise QB, Stafford will lead them to a Super Bowl win pretty soon.



I think Stafford will lead the team he signs with when his contract is up in Detroit.

Brock 01-06-2010 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PastorMikH (Post 6417663)
I think Stafford will lead the team he signs with when his contract is up in Detroit.

What a silly thing to say.

dirk digler 01-06-2010 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6417661)
Yes they do

no they don't

DaneMcCloud 01-06-2010 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6417642)
Yeah to coach for the guy who's balls he used to live in.
:rolleyes:

Hey, I wasn't the one who made the absolute statement, was I?

Brock 01-06-2010 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6417667)
no they don't

yes they do

Extra Point 01-06-2010 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6417656)
I don't because Detroit has something we don't have. They have a legit franchise QB, Stafford will lead them to a Super Bowl win pretty soon.

In how many SBs did Archie Manning play? Dan Fouts?

ChiefsCountry 01-06-2010 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6417667)
no they don't

Stafford and Schwartz will lead them to a playoff win before Cassel and Haley do the Chiefs.

Micjones 01-06-2010 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6417668)
Hey, I wasn't the one who made the absolute statement, was I?

Great you win! You found the NFL exception.

Might've even been something to be proud of if the two coaches didn't share the same last name.
It doesn't happen very often. Kinda like you having something insightful to say about football.

dirk digler 01-06-2010 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6417670)
yes they do

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6417672)
Stafford and Schwartz will lead them to a playoff win before Cassel and Haley do the Chiefs.

No they won't. They have their kryptonite, his name is Gunther

TigerPig 01-06-2010 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PastorMikH (Post 6417648)
Detroit has had the top draft picks since Barry Sanders retired and no matter who's coach, they stay the same. I wonder how many top draft picks are praying at Detroit walks to the podium, "Please Lord, don't let them pick me."

They're probably hoping for a four-year deal instead of a seven... :-)

In all fairness, though. Matt Millen did fuck them over royally the last 8-9 years. They should have been making progress during that time and they didn't. I feel bad for Detroit fans, and I really hope to see the day they can win against GB both times in a season, or even win a playoff game.

OnTheWarpath15 01-06-2010 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6417658)
No they don't

Franchise QB? Check.

Elite WR? Check.

Solid RB? Check.

Solid LB's? Check.

Damn good safety? Check.


They are a LT and Cliff Avril meeting his potential away from having every core position covered.

We have one of those things, maybe. (Charles)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.