ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Would You Trade Our 3rd Rnd Pick For Boldin? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=222205)

Marco Polo 01-22-2010 09:44 AM

Would You Trade Our 3rd Rnd Pick For Boldin?
 
Per Rotoworld:

Beat writer Kent Somers expects the Cardinals to be "earnest in their efforts to trade" Anquan Boldin this offseason.

Their best offer last year was reportedly a third-round pick and another player, and Somers suspects that offer might be enough to do the trick this time around. Boldin, 29, has been injury prone as he enters the final year of his contract. The Cardinals are 6-2 without him over the past two years, and they're confident in Steve Breaston and Early Doucet replacing his production. Jan. 22 - 10:34 am et

Since we have an upper third round pick, perhaps we don't need to send a player along with it?

RedThat 01-22-2010 09:45 AM

Absolutely would.

BigRedChief 01-22-2010 09:46 AM

In a heart beat. Done deal. Print Em!

CaliforniaChief 01-22-2010 09:48 AM

I would the whole thing.

Brock 01-22-2010 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 6468328)
In a heart beat. Done deal. Print Em!

So you're saying there's a chance?

Mile High Mania 01-22-2010 09:56 AM

BOOM ... Denver trades Marshall to a team like the Ravens for a 1st and 3rd, then they send a 3rd to AZ for Boldin. Or, make it a later 3rd and a 5th... I don't care.

Love it.

patteeu 01-22-2010 09:57 AM

I love Boldin but I'd lean against it. He's on the back side of his career (not saying at the end of it, mind you), he's been injury prone, and he doesn't have a long-term contract so he'll be looking for money. I'd rather see the Chiefs find a younger free agent or draft someone. If the Chiefs were ready to make their run and they were a couple of players away, I'd go for it, but not under the current circumstances.

CaliforniaChief 01-22-2010 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 6468375)
BOOM ... Denver trades Marshall to a team like the Ravens for a 1st and 3rd, then they send a 3rd to AZ for Boldin.

Love it.

Nice try, but I think we have already seen your WROTF. He has great chemistry with Kyle Orton, and averages around 50 yards/reception.

Derrick Johnson.

Sofa King 01-22-2010 09:58 AM

hellz yeah i'd trade a 3rd for him.... those 5 games he is healthy will be fun to watch!

patteeu 01-22-2010 09:59 AM

After the draft, if we think we've filled enough holes, I'd consider trading a 2011 3rd for him.

nychief 01-22-2010 10:06 AM

not much more tred on those tires.... I'd be worried about his health... and he is not too far being on the wrong side of 30... A 4th?

Deberg_1990 01-22-2010 10:08 AM

Without question. How many 3rd round picks would end up being better than him?

Iowanian 01-22-2010 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 6468375)
BOOM ... Denver trades Marshall to a team like the Ravens for a 1st and 3rd, then they send a 3rd to AZ for Boldin. Or, make it a later 3rd and a 5th... I don't care.

Love it.


You forgot to say "Amen" at the end.

Saccopoo 01-22-2010 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 6468375)
BOOM ... Denver trades Marshall to a team like the Ravens for a 1st and 3rd, then they send a 3rd to AZ for Boldin. Or, make it a later 3rd and a 5th... I don't care.

Love it.

:spock:

Did you get kicked off every Donco message board or something?

Molitoth 01-22-2010 10:11 AM

Seems the guy just wants paid to me. If we pay him he better produce something other than sideline sour grapes.

Haley knows him best, if Haley believes he will put forth the effort here... then I say Yes bring him in for a 3rd round pick.

Gonzo 01-22-2010 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 6468384)
Nice try, but I think we have already seen your WROTF. He has great chemistry with Kyle Orton, and averages around 50 yards/reception.

Derrick Johnson.

ROFL
Yeah, that guys averaging 2 td's a game and over 50 ypc for them...
Posted via Mobile Device

The Franchise 01-22-2010 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6468439)
I'm going to go with No Thanks. The dude is 29 and injury prone.

This.

tmax63 01-22-2010 10:19 AM

I think I'll defer to Haley on this one. He should know the guy about as well as anyone and if he brings him here I'll be happy or if he stays away I'll think he has a reason. Not blind faith in Haley, just saying he should know this situation and player better than anyone here in this one instance.

ToxSocks 01-22-2010 10:19 AM

I'd say **** yes. I'd rather have a 29 year old Boldin that gives us a legitamet (sp) WR on the outside then another Alex Magee.

Charles
Boldin
Bowe
Maybe Chambers.

Now we are talking explosive at the skill position. Boldin would fill a huge need till Haley can draft and develop some decent WR's.

And who gives a shit how much he wants to get paid. Uncapped year coming up.

HemiEd 01-22-2010 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6468379)
I love Boldin but I'd lean against it. He's on the back side of his career (not saying at the end of it, mind you), he's been injury prone, and he doesn't have a long-term contract so he'll be looking for money. I'd rather see the Chiefs find a younger free agent or draft someone. If the Chiefs were ready to make their run and they were a couple of players away, I'd go for it, but not under the current circumstances.

I agree, this team has done too much of that shit over the years. Keep the picks and develop their own wide receivers, they now have the coaching staff to pull it off.

Mr. Laz 01-22-2010 10:22 AM

actually the real question should be "Would you give a huge contract to a 29 year old receiver who has been injured the last 2 seasons?"

Brock 01-22-2010 10:23 AM

Nope, I sure wouldn't.

RedThat 01-22-2010 10:28 AM

After Boldin and Haley had their feud on the sidelines, could that possibly have an effect on their relationship? Where it would have an impact on the interest level from the Chiefs forefront?

I wonder if Haley would want him? Thats the part that concerns me.

bevischief 01-22-2010 10:43 AM

No not at this time, we have too many needs to spend on a player that wants to get paid and has a history of injuries, maybe this would make sense after the draft and free agency.

BigCatDaddy 01-22-2010 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6468488)
I'd say **** yes. I'd rather have a 29 year old Boldin that gives us a legitamet (sp) WR on the outside then another Alex Magee.

Yeah, or another Jamal Charles!!!!! Oh wait......

RedThat 01-22-2010 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6468496)
actually the real question should be "Would you give a huge contract to a 29 year old receiver who has been injured the last 2 seasons?"

I would for a couple of reasons. 1. the guy is consistent, and 2. he produces

can't go wrong with that?

the injuries are a concern, yes, but the fact of the matter is, Boldin is a gamer. If we go by stats, and history, it shows that he is good to play for at least 3 quarters of a season. Not bad. Only once in his career has he played for half a season. Plus, WR is a position that guys can play well into their 30's anyway.

*I'd be for the move, but I also think the Chiefs should re-sign Chambers. Having a WR corps of Bowe, Boldin, and Chambers is really stout.

*Even if Boldin got hurt, we couldn't take away what he would bring in productivity. I still think Chambers could fill in as a starter for those 4 games, and having him to go alongside with Bowe and Charles, I could live with that.

-King- 01-22-2010 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6468461)
This.

You just agreed with your own post.
Posted via Mobile Device

beer bacon 01-22-2010 10:58 AM

Yeah, so the "injury prone" Anquan Boldin has had over 1,000 receiving yards in four of his last five seasons. He had over 800 in his down year. That type of production is totally not worth a 3rd round draft pick.

beer bacon 01-22-2010 10:59 AM

It is pretty obvious that the Chiefs can just pull any WR off the street and get good production. You Boldin detractors are geniouses.

ToxSocks 01-22-2010 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief (Post 6468552)
No not at this time, we have too many needs to spend on a player that wants to get paid and has a history of injuries, maybe this would make sense after the draft and free agency.

That really doesn't make much sense. If we're ever going to get back to winning, we need to find winning players. We all know that a franchise can turn around within one season if you add the right players. Boldin could be one of those players. By adding Bolden, you could say that we've fixed our WR issues that have been plaguing this team for the last decade AT LEAST. If a Pro-Bowl WR that is NOT on the downside of his career isn't worth a 3rd rnd pick, then we are being too damn picky.

I'd rather have a proven Pro-Bowl WR that we KNOW will have a substantial impact on the offense rather then trying to draft a Rookie WR in the 3rd round of a weak Wr class. And if the presence of Boldin equates to maybe 7 more points per game, then how many more games would we win?

Good football teams fill there roster with good football players whenever the opportunity arises.

How good do we look at the skill positions if we had:

Charles
Boldin
Bowe
Chambers (maybe) On Offense

And

Flowers
Carr
Berry
Page
Johnson
Spikes
Dorsey

On D.

That's impact right there. Especially with a Weiss and Crennel coaching.

The Franchise 01-22-2010 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 6468576)
You just agreed with your own post.
Posted via Mobile Device

I only did that because I posted that response in the REPOST thread. So I quoted it and posted it over here.

LaChapelle 01-22-2010 11:25 AM

**** that
Bigfoot is free

patteeu 01-22-2010 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 6468450)
Haley knows him best, if Haley believes he will put forth the effort here... then I say Yes bring him in for a 3rd round pick.

Good point.

Sfeihc 01-22-2010 11:36 AM

Thanks but I'm going to have to quote Nancy Reagan and, "Just Say, No!"

ToxSocks 01-22-2010 11:37 AM

It's funny how much of a difference 1 season makes. Now all of a sudden he's old, injury prone and not worth the money. Gimme a break.

thecoffeeguy 01-22-2010 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 6468375)
BOOM ... Denver trades Marshall to a team like the Ravens for a 1st and 3rd, then they send a 3rd to AZ for Boldin. Or, make it a later 3rd and a 5th... I don't care.

Love it.

Dont think teams are going to offer a #1 for Marshall. Unlikely. I see a 2nd and maybe a 4th, but not a 1st.

ToxSocks 01-22-2010 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thecoffeeguy (Post 6468740)
Dont think teams are going to offer a #1 for Marshall. Unlikely. I see a 2nd and maybe a 4th, but not a 1st.

I wouldn't be surprised. There is always a team dumb enough. Always. Didn't the lions get a 1st for Williams?

tyton75 01-22-2010 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 6468334)
I would the whole thing.

lmao

Mile High Mania 01-22-2010 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6468448)
:spock:

Did you get kicked off every Donco message board or something?

Hmmm... why would you think that happened?

Mile High Mania 01-22-2010 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thecoffeeguy (Post 6468740)
Dont think teams are going to offer a #1 for Marshall. Unlikely. I see a 2nd and maybe a 4th, but not a 1st.

Enh, I dunno about that...

CoMoChief 01-22-2010 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6468488)
I'd say **** yes. I'd rather have a 29 year old Boldin that gives us a legitamet (sp) WR on the outside then another Alex Magee.

Charles
Boldin
Bowe
Maybe Chambers.

Now we are talking explosive at the skill position. Boldin would fill a huge need till Haley can draft and develop some decent WR's.

And who gives a shit how much he wants to get paid. Uncapped year coming up.

ROFL

Mr. Laz 01-22-2010 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 6468778)
ROFL

what's so funny?

Sure-Oz 01-22-2010 12:00 PM

I'd like him on the team, and we will likely screw up our 3rd rounder anyway, so do it

suds79 01-22-2010 12:05 PM

Yeah what are the chances that our 3rd turns out to contribute 1/2 as much as Boldin would over the next 2-3 years.

I'd be for that for a 3rd if it was possible.

He'd add a lot.

SDChiefs 01-22-2010 12:10 PM

In the drop of a dime.

CoMoChief 01-22-2010 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6468789)
what's so funny?

The fact that he listed Alex Magee as a WR option, since the current options we have at that position blow ass and can't catch.

DaneMcCloud 01-22-2010 12:15 PM

No freakin' way. I'd rather have Doucet, by a mile.

Boldin is unreliable at this stage in his career. By the time the Chiefs are ready to compete, he'll be 30 or 31 and I'd rather have a 24 year old receiver on the team at that time than a guy in his 30's.

With the fifth pick in the third round of the 2010 draft, the Chiefs have the opportunity to select a player that will be with the team for a decade.

Not two years.

SDChiefs 01-22-2010 12:18 PM

Im just going to throw this out there for shits and giggles. Everyone knows hes not currently happy with the organization and the lack of a long term contract. He feels wronged by the Cards for giving Fitz it, and not him. In his mind I believe, however wrong it might be, that he thinks he is the same calibur player as Fitz.

Whos to say that once he gets his contract and feels appreciated that he wont play through some of those injuries that held him out the past couple of years. Maybe he just used them as an excuse to not play for a team he wants out of. Not saying thats a good or bad thing, just that if we give him the contract he desires he may have a 'healthy' season again. Just throwing it out there.

Flame away.

Mr. Flopnuts 01-22-2010 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6468379)
I love Boldin but I'd lean against it. He's on the back side of his career (not saying at the end of it, mind you), he's been injury prone, and he doesn't have a long-term contract so he'll be looking for money. I'd rather see the Chiefs find a younger free agent or draft someone. If the Chiefs were ready to make their run and they were a couple of players away, I'd go for it, but not under the current circumstances.

I think he's actually in his prime right now. 29 isn't that old for the type of receiver that Boldin is. I wouldn't give up more than a 3rd, but I'd give up our 3rd for him. He's been hurt and I was actually talking about that in another thread. But the guy is worth a 3rd. Let him heal up from that hamstring injury, and I expect him to have a good year.

DaKCMan AP 01-22-2010 12:18 PM

No.

Saccopoo 01-22-2010 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6468742)
I wouldn't be surprised. There is always a team dumb enough. Always. Didn't the lions get a 1st for Williams?

Jerry Jones had a hard on for Williams since his UT days. He wanted him and was willing to give up whatever to get him. The 1st, 3rd and 5th that he gave up for him was insane though. However, that doesn't mean that just because Jerry Jones loved a guy that every team in the league will do the same.

Conversely, nobody, and I mean nobody, has a hard on for a guy who is one infraction away from a massive suspension because he likes to beat up women and, perhaps more importantly, is also an immature team cancer that thinks he's better than the team itself.

Mile High is high as he continues to think that any team in the league will give up a first rounder for Marshall.

warrior 01-22-2010 12:20 PM

Not a chance --that 3rd rd pick in this draft is like a mid 2nd in most other years.
Spend the money on wilfolk

Mr. Laz 01-22-2010 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 6468843)
The fact that he listed Alex Magee as a WR option, since the current options we have at that position blow ass and can't catch.

he wasn't listing Alex Magee as a wide receiver, he used Magee's name because he was our 3rd round pick last year.

"would you trade a 3rd round pick for Boldin?"


he was saying that WR Boldin > DE Magee type player in the 3rd round.

Titty Meat 01-22-2010 12:39 PM

Whoops didn't see this thread. Yes i'd trade a 3rd for Boldin, re-sign Chambers and dump Bowe for a 2nd.

The Bad Guy 01-22-2010 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 6468375)
BOOM ... Denver trades Marshall to a team like the Ravens for a 1st and 3rd, then they send a 3rd to AZ for Boldin. Or, make it a later 3rd and a 5th... I don't care.

Love it.

Keep dreaming that a team is giving a #1 for Marshall.

The Bad Guy 01-22-2010 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warrior (Post 6468866)
Not a chance --that 3rd rd pick in this draft is like a mid 2nd in most other years.
Spend the money on wilfolk

Make some sense please for the love of god.

It's a 3rd round pick. It's not a 2nd "in other other years".

Jesus.

And money isn't an issue at all. We have alloted the lowest amount of dollars to players in the entire NFL.

Mama Hip Rockets 01-22-2010 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 6468388)
hellz yeah i'd trade a 3rd for him.... those 5 games he is healthy will be fun to watch!

well, that's more games than the average chiefs draft pick plays in anyway, so why not?

bevischief 01-22-2010 12:51 PM

How do we know that he will turn around his act if he comes here to get paid?

Titty Meat 01-22-2010 12:51 PM

Keep in mind if you trade for Boldin you'll also have to pay him a new contract.

SAUTO 01-22-2010 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6468948)
Keep in mind if you trade for Boldin you'll also have to pay him a new contract.

but but thats not the CP way, we should trade for him, let him play out this year and if he plays well with no injuries we should franchise him and try to work out a long term deal then. RIGHT?

SDChiefs 01-22-2010 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6468994)
but but thats not the CP way, we should trade for him, let him play out this year and if he plays well with no injuries we should franchise him and try to work out a long term deal then. RIGHT?

Dude, hes proven. Cassel was not. Whole different scenario.

Coogs 01-22-2010 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6468850)
No freakin' way. I'd rather have Doucet, by a mile.

Boldin is unreliable at this stage in his career. By the time the Chiefs are ready to compete, he'll be 30 or 31 and I'd rather have a 24 year old receiver on the team at that time than a guy in his 30's.

With the fifth pick in the third round of the 2010 draft, the Chiefs have the opportunity to select a player that will be with the team for a decade.

Not two years.

This

SAUTO 01-22-2010 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SDChiefs (Post 6469033)
Dude, hes proven. Cassel was not. Whole different scenario.

ROFL, proven to be an injury waiting to happen.

salame 01-22-2010 01:37 PM

yes i would

The Bad Guy 01-22-2010 01:38 PM

I'm not trading for Boldin. He's broken down.

Sure-Oz 01-22-2010 01:45 PM

This won't happen anyway, he'll get traded to a contender. I hope we re-sign chambers though

RustShack 01-22-2010 01:50 PM

I would have traded a third last year, I'll trade a fourth this year.

bevischief 01-22-2010 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6469095)
This won't happen anyway, he'll get traded to a contender. I hope we re-sign chambers though

Or the donkeys...

MoreLemonPledge 01-22-2010 02:17 PM

Absolutely. Other than Charles, we haven't had a lot of luck in the draft lately, and especially in the middle rounds. He's a proven commodity, if only for a couple more seasons. Give Cassel some help and sign him.

DeezNutz 01-22-2010 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmax63 (Post 6468486)
I think I'll defer to Haley on this one. He should know the guy about as well as anyone and if he brings him here I'll be happy or if he stays away I'll think he has a reason. Not blind faith in Haley, just saying he should know this situation and player better than anyone here in this one instance.

Just like we should defer to Pioli about Cassel? After all, our GM knows him best, so if he wants to pull the trigger, we know the dude is legit.

Um, yeah, **** that.

Until they prove otherwise, all our head guys have demonstrated is that they're dumb as ****.

SDChiefs 01-22-2010 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6469064)
ROFL, proven to be an injury waiting to happen.

Yes, because when he decided AZ was screwing him, he started missing games due to injury. Hmmm, conincedence?

DaneMcCloud 01-22-2010 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoreLemonPledge (Post 6469228)
Absolutely. Other than Charles, we haven't had a lot of luck in the draft lately, and especially in the middle rounds. He's a proven commodity, if only for a couple more seasons. Give Cassel some help and sign him.

Huh?

If you perform proper due-diligence, luck isn't a factor.

Pissing away draft choices for broken down players with limited playing time is how this team became so talent depleted in the first place.

MahiMike 01-22-2010 02:39 PM

Yes. This is exactly how we should acquire skill players. Still sticking to my, "draft big uglies" and get skill players thru FA.

DaneMcCloud 01-22-2010 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 6469329)
Yes. This is exactly how we should acquire skill players. Still sticking to my, "draft big uglies" and get skill players thru FA.

Free agency doesn't exist this year.

And btw, that's a horrible plan.

DeezNutz 01-22-2010 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 6469329)
Yes. This is exactly how we should acquire skill players. Still sticking to my, "draft big uglies" and get skill players thru FA.

I agree. Since the best skill players are generally available through FA. That's where you're going to get the most talent with the most upside.

It's MUCH harder to fill positions like guard and center through FA, so that's why we have to use the draft.

Rausch 01-22-2010 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6469313)

Pissing away draft choices for broken down players with limited playing time is how this team became so talent depleted in the first place.

That exact situation is what happened the last time we won a playoff game (Marcus Allen/Montana.)

Titty Meat 01-22-2010 02:46 PM

How is Boldin broken down? He played 15 games this year and would be the best WR on this team. Trade for him and dump Bowe. The Chiefs would have 3 2nd round picks.

BigMeatballDave 01-22-2010 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6469353)
How is Boldin broken down? He played 15 games this year and would be the best WR on this team. Trade for him and dump Bowe. The Chiefs would have 3 2nd round picks.

:spock:

RustShack 01-22-2010 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6469353)
How is Boldin broken down? He played 15 games this year and would be the best WR on this team. Trade for him and dump Bowe. The Chiefs would have 3 2nd round picks.

No.

DaneMcCloud 01-22-2010 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6469353)
How is Boldin broken down? He played 15 games this year and would be the best WR on this team. Trade for him and dump Bowe. The Chiefs would have 3 2nd round picks.

Dude, if he can be replaced by Early Doucet, a second rounder from a few years back, the Chiefs can most certainly find a similar receiver with either 2a or 2b in the upcoming draft.

I'd rather have a guy that's 21 to 23 years old as opposed to a 29 year-old that's had injury issues.

And while he may have started 15 games this past season, he didn't finish 15 games AND he sat out of the playoffs.

He'll be 30 in October and won't have Kurt Warner throwing passes to him in Kansas City.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.