ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Lack of quality WR's hurting Cassel & Chiefs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=236563)

KChiefs1 11-09-2010 11:46 AM

Lack of quality WR's hurting Cassel & Chiefs
 
http://arrowheadaddict.com/2010/11/0...ng-the-chiefs/

Quote:

Lack Of Quality Receivers Hurting The Chiefs
Updated 11/09/2010 10:58 AM
by Patrick Allen


It is time to throw Kansas City Chiefs QB Matt Cassel a bone.

If you've been reading this site for more than a couple of weeks, you know that I have been highly critical of Cassel. I have particularly been hard on him about his completion percentage which has spent more time on the wrong side of 60 percent than I would like. However, now that we are halfway through the season I think it is time to give the Chiefs signal caller another look.

After giving it much thought I think that Matt Cassel is in a very tough position with this year's team. He is a Quarterback with no receivers.


Scott Pioli has had a lot of his bets pay off this season but one of his failures has been the resigning of WR Chris Chambers. I think even Pioli was worried about Chambers which is why he waited so long to resign him and in the interim, tried to trade for Anquan Boldin. It came down to the Chiefs and the Ravens battling for Boldin's services and in the end, the Ravens were willing to give up more draft picks than the Chiefs. For the record, I think Pioli did the right thing, especially considering the talent level of his 2010 draft class. Boldin woul dhave helped out a lot this year but these rookies will be more valuable in the long run.

After failing to make the trade for Boldin, Pioli resigned Chris Chambers. He also drafted WR Dexter McCluster who he figured could be a solid outlet for Cassel in the slot.

He was kind of right.

McCluster is a dynamic weapon but he wasn't ready to step in and be an impact receiver from day one. Most of the damage McCluster has done this season has come when he has lined up in the backfield. That doesn't mean that McCluster isn't going to turn in to a good receiver, it simply means he is a rookie who wasn't that experienced at receiver to begin with, learning to play the position at the NFL level. It was always going to take time.

The other side of the Chambers/McCluster bet, however, is what has hurt the Chiefs and Cassel the most. Chambers is a bum. I don't know if he just got old or if he really does quit once he gets paid. I'm not sure what goes on in the head of a guy who would get a restraining order against a woman and then marry her a few months later. All I do know is that they guy hasn't shown up this year and it doesn't appear he is going to show up any time soon. He is dead weight but unfortunately, he is all we've got.

Before being overly critical of Cassel, you have to look at what the dude is working with. He's got Bowe and then…er…

McCluster (injured)

Terry Copper

Chris Chambers

Verran Tucker

Seriously? Look, the way Chambers is playing he would probably get cut by most NFL teams at this point. Tuker and Copper wouldn't even BE on other NFL teams. Maybe Copper would sneak on a squad as a special teamer but you can bet your behind he wouldn't be lining up at receiver.

Cassel is doing the best he can with what he has to work with. The last two games he has had three targets:

Dwayne Bowe

The team’s best receiver is actually having a pretty decent season. He has a few drops but for the most part, he has been very productive.

Tony Moeaki

Moeaki is the Chiefs second best wide receiver and he is a freaking tight end!

Jamaal Charles

The team’s third best wide receiver, Jamaal Charles, is also the leagues best second string running back.

When McCluster comes back, he’ll slide back in tot he #3 slot and Charles can go back to being a backup running back.

And before you all start going gaga over Verran Tucker, remember that his spectacular TD catch from Sunday is his ONLY catch in the three weeks that he has been active. This isn't an indictment on Tucker. The dude has potential but he isn't getting open and right now, that is what Cassel needs.

The reason the Chiefs threw so much against the Raiders is because Oakland wasin single coverage all day long with no safties. People have been talking about how Oakland's strategy was an indictment on Cassel. They've been saying the Raiders didn't believe Cassel could beat them. I disagree with this. I think the Raiders believed the Chiefs receivers couldn't beat them and they were right. Look Bowe has never been a burner but you are telling me not Chambers, Copper or Tucker could put a good enough move on their man to blow by them and get wide open over the top? If the Raiders tried that kind of crap on the Indianapolis Colts Peyton Manning would throw for 37 touchdowns. Every time Cassel completed a pass Sunday, his man was covered pretty well. There were very few passes that went to wide open receivers.

While watching Sunday's game, the guy across from me kept bemoaning that Cassel wasn't throwing the ball. He wasn't throwing it because he can't see wide open receivers. He wasn't throwing it because there were no open receivers. It is obvious that the Chiefs and Cassel have made it a priority to take care of the football. Cassel is under strict instructions not to force passes and to get rid of the ball if he senses trouble, even if that means throwing it away. He has been doing that and the results, for the most part, have been positive.

Cassel is doing a fine job of hitting Moeaki and Bowe when they are open. He is fairly efficient at hitting Charles when he comes out of the backfield. Before Dexter McCluster got injured, Cassel started finding him more down field as well. He just doesn't have the tools he needs in the receiving game. Philip Rivers might be able to succeed with receivers off the street but Cassel is no Philip Rivers. * I think the Chiefs passing game is going to continue to struggle until they get Dexter McCluster back. I think the presence of McCluster helps both Bowe and Moeaki. It will also keep Jamaal Charles in the backfield where he belongs. With the absence of McCluster, the Chiefs have been using Charles a little more in the passing game because they know they need another threat out there. *

The*Cassel lead Chiefs will likely never be a passing team but if they don’t get some more help at the WR position soon, KC’s air attack will stay grounded.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2010 11:48 AM

Quote:

Before Dexter McCluster got injured, Cassel started finding him more down field as well.
Down the field as in, one yard down the field?

LaChapelle 11-09-2010 11:52 AM

Day Rome Built Not

Fish 11-09-2010 11:53 AM

Cassel needs more weapons. All those weapons that we added last offseason have proven insufficient... We need 3 Jerry Rice clones, and Cassel will flourish... maybe...

Pants 11-09-2010 11:55 AM

What kind of weapons are Philip Rivers and Peyton Manning enjoying right now? Shut the **** up, Patrick Allen.

FAX 11-09-2010 11:55 AM

ROFL

FAX

Just Passin' By 11-09-2010 11:57 AM

The Chiefs WR corps being lousy isn't exactly news.

Mr. Laz 11-09-2010 11:59 AM

it's true, neither our QB or WR's are particularly good.

our offense tackles are nothing to write home about either


so the 3 main parts of an nfl passing game are weak on the Chiefs ... not good.

Champ 11-09-2010 11:59 AM

This is another reason why Chief fans shouldn't be talking about playoffs.

This is a passing leaugue and you have by far the worst passing game in the NFL.

The Raiders disrespected Matt Cassel and your receivers all day by manning up on them, with little to no safety help over the top. And you still couldn't beat them.

Damn.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2010 12:05 PM

http://uranus.ckt.net/%7Egochiefs/bi.../casselsux.gif

Mr. Laz 11-09-2010 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7160622)

where the gif of bowe dropping the ball on his gaming winn err losing drop?

cherry picking bitch

L.A. Chieffan 11-09-2010 12:09 PM

The sweet comfort of mediocrity calls thy name.

Puke.

Sure-Oz 11-09-2010 12:31 PM

Lack of quality WR's sure hurt Rivers

Tribal Warfare 11-09-2010 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 7160631)
where the gif of bowe dropping the ball on his gaming winn err losing drop?

cherry picking bitch

or how about the 3 and out during OT?

Molitoth 11-09-2010 12:49 PM

Quote:

Philip Rivers might be able to succeed with receivers off the street but Cassel is no Philip Rivers
It doesn't matter what Chiefs receivers are on the field.... Matt knows who he is throwing the ball to when he exits the huddle.... he then stares them down and throws it to them in double/triple coverage. If this isn't the case, it's because Cassel saw a defensive lineman out of the corner of his eye 8 yards away and paniced to throw to the checkdown.

Molitoth 11-09-2010 12:50 PM

For the chiefs to put a bunch of money into proven name WR's.... it would be like putting a Turbo on a Ford Pinto. It's pointless when your QB blows.

Deberg_1990 11-09-2010 12:51 PM

Why can Manning and Rivers make practice squad guys look like seasoned vets right from the start??

Just Passin' By 11-09-2010 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7160753)
Why can Manning and Rivers make practice squad guys look like seasoned vets right from the start??

Manning's numbers have suffered with the injuries to his receivers, and that's with still having a receiver the caliber of Reggie Wayne out on the field. Brady's numbers have suffered with the absence of Moss and the injury situation with Branch and Welker.

PunkinDrublic 11-09-2010 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Champ (Post 7160606)
This is another reason why Chief fans shouldn't be talking about playoffs.

This is a passing leaugue and you have by far the worst passing game in the NFL.

The Raiders disrespected Matt Cassel and your receivers all day by manning up on them, with little to no safety help over the top. And you still couldn't beat them.

Damn.

Quit acting like you blew us out you ignorant f@ggot.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2010 01:03 PM

The fact that we have one legit WR on this team is an indictment of Scott Pioli.

He should be raked over the coals for not bringing in Anquan Boldin and spending a 2nd round pick on Dexter McGimmick.

Pants 11-09-2010 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 7160775)
Manning's numbers have suffered with the injuries to his receivers, and that's with still having a receiver the caliber of Reggie Wayne out on the field. Brady's numbers have suffered with the absence of Moss and the injury situation with Branch and Welker.

Are you not aware of the GIFed UP thread? Sometimes you can see interesting things in there. Things like open receivers being ignored by Matt Cassel, for example. I know it's shocking, but you should probably head over there and take a look.

the Talking Can 11-09-2010 01:17 PM

so, last year's excuse is still this year's excuse?



too bad Cassel doesn't have a running game to take the pressure off him....

Rausch 11-09-2010 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7160791)
so, last year's excuse is still this year's excuse?



too bad Cassel doesn't have a running game to take the pressure off him....

Or a decent offensive line.

Or a solid OC.
:rolleyes:

Red Dawg 11-09-2010 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 7160591)
What kind of weapons are Philip Rivers and Peyton Manning enjoying right now? Shut the **** up, Patrick Allen.

WTF? The back up WR's on those teams are all world compared to ours. Herm got rid of all speed at the position. He wanted them all to be Giants like Bowe.

Warrior5 11-09-2010 01:26 PM

Related topic: anyone know McCluster's status?

the Talking Can 11-09-2010 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 7160797)
Or a decent offensive line.

Or a solid OC.
:rolleyes:

or a draft full of playmakers

Reerun_KC 11-09-2010 01:30 PM

I think there have been plenty of times that Cassel has hurt more than helped...

Yes our WR's blow ass, but so does our QB.... Neither are helping either out...

Suck + Suck = Suck....

milkman 11-09-2010 01:33 PM

Has anyone watched the Giants?

His receivers have let balls go right through their hands into the DB's hands for interceptions.

They probably have as many, if not more, drops than the Chiefs receivers.

But Eli Manning overcomes the mistakes and continues to make plays and lead that team to wins.

Eli is a Manning, but he ain't Peyton.

He's a good, even very good QB.

But that is the difference between a backup QB (Cassel) and an NFL calibre starting QB.

Three7s 11-09-2010 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Champ (Post 7160606)
This is another reason why Chief fans shouldn't be talking about playoffs.

This is a passing leaugue and you have by far the worst passing game in the NFL.

The Raiders disrespected Matt Cassel and your receivers all day by manning up on them, with little to no safety help over the top. And you still couldn't beat them.

Damn.

This is another reason why Raiders fans shouldn't be thinking about breaking out of jail to buy playoff tickets.

The Chiefs WRs and QB are about as good that of MU's, which aren't very good. Even with the Chiefs terribad passing attack, you still managed to give up 2 passing TDs, one to a guy who's hardly played a game in his life.

On defense, the Chiefs disrespected the Raiders all day by blitzing guys like Berry, thus no safety help. What does that say about Campbell? The difference is Ford is better than any loser WR the Chiefs have on the team. Of course, it still went to OT, even with a bunch of joke WRs.


See? I can do a troll post too.:rolleyes:

Just Passin' By 11-09-2010 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 7160785)
Are you not aware of the GIFed UP thread? Sometimes you can see interesting things in there. Things like open receivers being ignored by Matt Cassel, for example. I know it's shocking, but you should probably head over there and take a look.

Cassel's not a top 5 quarterback. That's not news. Neither are all but 5 quarterbacks in the league. However, every QB misfires on throws. Every QB misses open receivers.

That doesn't change the reality of how much help/harm the team's wide receivers are bringing to the table, which is what this thread's OP was about.

milkman 11-09-2010 01:38 PM

Colt McCoy, a third round rookie QB is throwing to a who's who of scrub receivers, and he has looked better in three starts than Cassel has looked in 30+ starts.

The Franchise 11-09-2010 02:16 PM

Matt Cassel has run out of excuses. He's not a starting QB.

FAX 11-09-2010 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7160819)
Colt McCoy, a third round rookie QB is throwing to a who's who of scrub receivers, and he has looked better in three starts than Cassel has looked in 30+ starts.

That's really the key point, right there ... for us Chiefs fans, I mean.

A combination of homervision, hope, and helplessness are causing people (including me, by the way) to look for the lipstick on Cassel's performances. I was watching Ruthlessburger last night and it struck me that there is a vast difference in things like footwork, throwing mechanics, reads, etc. between Cassel and guys like him. And I absolutely despise Ruthlessburger.

Given that I've grown accustomed to Cassel's delivery and resigned myself to the fact that his relatively slow release is due, in part, to his size, I was kind of stunned watching a big guy like Ruthlessburger who can (when he wants/needs to) get the ball out really, really fast and be extremely accurate (on the quick slant in the face of blitz pressure, for example).

It's sad because I know in my heart of hearts that Haley would like a dependable, consistent quarterback who can develop the passing game on this young team. Surely, he and Weis could draw up some interesting stuff with a guy who can consistently make reads and all the necessary professional throws. I have to believe that Haley dreams of a passing game that can compete with our rushing offense.

FAX

Deberg_1990 11-09-2010 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7160813)
Has anyone watched the Giants?

His receivers have let balls go right through their hands into the DB's hands for interceptions.

They probably have as many, if not more, drops than the Chiefs receivers.

But Eli Manning overcomes the mistakes and continues to make plays and lead that team to wins.

Eli is a Manning, but he ain't Peyton.

He's a good, even very good QB.

But that is the difference between a backup QB (Cassel) and an NFL calibre starting QB.

Just a guess, but Manning probably gets more attempts per game than Cassel does?

There are times i wish the Chiefs would let Cassel attempt more passes. Depends on the game situation....

The Franchise 11-09-2010 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7160887)
Just a guess, but Manning probably gets more attempts pre game than Cassel does?

There are times i wish the Chiefs would let Cassel attempt more passes. Depends on the game situation....

They don't because they know what he is. This gameplan is tailored to make Cassel look decent....and it's not even doing that.

milkman 11-09-2010 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7160887)
Just a guess, but Manning probably gets more attempts per game than Cassel does?

There are times i wish the Chiefs would let Cassel attempt more passes. Depends on the game situation....

E Manning averages roughly 7.5 more attempts per game.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2010 02:33 PM

This hasn't really been discussed enough but consider this:

Both of the Chiefs TD "drives" were aided by the refs.

They gifted us with 40 yards on a bogus pass interference and with a 30-yard field on the bogus fumble.

Basically the only way we were scoring a TD in that game was the refs.

Without a running game Cassel couldn't lead a real drive worth a shit in that game, and he proved it in overtime.

Reerun_KC 11-09-2010 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 7160858)
Matt Cassel has run out of excuses. He's not a starting QB.

Agree 100%, Send him packin along with Bowe...

FAX 11-09-2010 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7160908)
This hasn't really been discussed enough but consider this:

Both of the Chiefs TD "drives" were aided by the refs.

They gifted us with 40 yards on a bogus pass interference and with a 30-yard field on the bogus fumble.

Basically the only way we were scoring a TD in that game was the refs.

Without a running game Cassel couldn't lead a real drive worth a shit in that game, and he proved it in overtime.

If you ever took the time to read my fascinating, insightful posts, you would know that it actually has been discussed, Mr. GoghChiefs.

This offense cannot seem to sustain a long drive without help. More often than not, we enter the redzone with assistance from the enemy or the refs or both. I think that's one of the reasons for all the 4th down calls.

FAX

Deberg_1990 11-09-2010 02:43 PM

If you had to choose one QB for a "game winning drive" who would it be?

1. Bono
2. Grbac
3. Cassel

Hammock Parties 11-09-2010 02:46 PM

Grbac: 50 percent chance he wins the game, 50 percent chance he throws the ball in bounds with no timeouts left and 10 seconds on the clock.

Bono: 25 percent chance he wins the game, 50 percent chance he throws four straight incompletions, 25 percent chance he throws an interception.

Cassel: 10 percent chance he wins the game, 90 percent chance the drive stalls around midfield and he throws a Hail Ducky that hits the crossbar.

The Franchise 11-09-2010 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 7160928)
Agree 100%, Send him packin along with Bowe...

I'm not like everyone else.....I'm not giving up on Bowe.

Bowe has 4 drops on the year. 4 in ****ing 8 games.

http://stats.washingtonpost.com/fb/l...iving&rank=232

Have they come at the most inopportune times? Yes. But FFS.....look at who is ahead of him on that list.

Sofa King 11-09-2010 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 7160953)
I'm not like everyone else.....I'm not giving up on Bowe.

Bowe has 4 drops on the year. 4 in ****ing 8 games.

http://stats.washingtonpost.com/fb/l...iving&rank=232

Have they come at the most inopportune times? Yes. But FFS.....look at who is ahead of him on that list.

i see no reason that bowe needs to be off the team..

this thread really should be the wr's are getting no help due to a shitty ass horrible ****ing QB.

Fish 11-09-2010 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 7160953)
I'm not like everyone else.....I'm not giving up on Bowe.

Bowe has 4 drops on the year. 4 in ****ing 8 games.

http://stats.washingtonpost.com/fb/l...iving&rank=232

Have they come at the most inopportune times? Yes. But FFS.....look at who is ahead of him on that list.

Yup.

Check this....

Tell me what the following players all have in common:

Miles Austin
Randy Moss
T.O.
Wes Welker
Andre Johnson
Brandon Marshall
Steve Smith(C)
Reggie Wayne
Mike Williams (Both Sea and TB)

Every one of these players has more drops and less TDs this season than Dwayne Bowe.

Chiefnj2 11-09-2010 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 7161016)
Yup.

Check this....

Tell me what the following players all have in common:

Miles Austin
Randy Moss
T.O.
Wes Welker
Andre Johnson
Brandon Marshall
Steve Smith(C)
Reggie Wayne
Mike Williams (Both Sea and TB)

Every one of these players has more drops and less TDs this season than Dwayne Bowe.

All I know is Andre Johnson CAUGHT his game winning TD, and didn't let the ball him in the damn chest and bounce to the turf.

The Franchise 11-09-2010 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 7161033)
All I know is Andre Johnson CAUGHT his game winning TD, and didn't let the ball him in the damn chest and bounce to the turf.

Nope....but he did drop a critical pass that resulted in an INT that ended the game.

milkman 11-09-2010 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 7161033)
All I know is Andre Johnson CAUGHT his game winning TD, and didn't let the ball him in the damn chest and bounce to the turf.

Andre Johnson also let a perfect pass that hit him in his hands in stride on what might have been a game winning drive go right through his hands and into the hands of a DB for a game ending interception against the Chargers.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2010 03:29 PM

People should really stop bitching about Bowe.

Put him on a team with a legit QB and he probably has 700 yards right now.

Fish 11-09-2010 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 7161033)
All I know is Andre Johnson CAUGHT his game winning TD, and didn't let the ball him in the damn chest and bounce to the turf.

Well, this isn't meant to say Bowe is better than all the players on that list. He's not.

The purpose of this was to show that Bowe is quietly having a decent year and has improved on his drops and TDs. People are calling to throw him off the team. Hell, I heard a caller on 810 today say that he'd hate it if the Chiefs got to the Superbowl this year, cause Bowe might drop a pass.

milkman 11-09-2010 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 7161047)
Well, this isn't meant to say Bowe is better than all the players on that list. He's not.

The purpose of this was to show that Bowe is quietly having a decent year and has improved on his drops and TDs. People are calling to throw him off the team. Hell, I heard a caller on 810 today say that he'd hate it if the Chiefs got to the Superbowl this year, cause Bowe might drop a pass.

People lack perspective.

Sure-Oz 11-09-2010 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 7161047)
Well, this isn't meant to say Bowe is better than all the players on that list. He's not.

The purpose of this was to show that Bowe is quietly having a decent year and has improved on his drops and TDs. People are calling to throw him off the team. Hell, I heard a caller on 810 today say that he'd hate it if the Chiefs got to the Superbowl this year, cause Bowe might drop a pass.

I heard that too, the idiot would rather not be in the SB with bowe and have a different WR and not be in the SB

****ing moron

Sofa King 11-09-2010 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7161041)
People should really stop bitching about Bowe.

Put him on a team with a legit QB and he probably has 700 yards right now.

Something like this.......



****ing Cassel....

i pray a top 3 QB falls to us in the draft...

Chiefaholic 11-09-2010 05:59 PM

Yeah... It's the WR's fault that they don't have a 60" vertical jump to catch the balls 10 foot over their heads. Quality WR's catch balls thrown 5 feet behind their backs on crossing routes and balls that hit the turf 5 yards in front of them. Sure Bowe has his faults, but I'de like to see how many "catchable passes" he drops when the QB hits him in the numbers in stride.

Chiefaholic 11-09-2010 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7160938)
If you had to choose one QB for a "game winning drive" who would it be?

1. Bono
2. Grbac
3. Cassel

Grbac

michaelj_58 11-09-2010 06:09 PM

receiver will be a top priority this coming offseason

TEX 11-09-2010 06:11 PM

The lack of quality WR's has been a constant for the past 20 + years or so. Think about it...

TEX 11-09-2010 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7161041)
People should really stop bitching about Bowe.

Put him on a team with a legit QB and he probably has 700 yards right now.

No way. Bowe will get in his own way regardless of the QB.

chiefzilla1501 11-09-2010 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7160908)
This hasn't really been discussed enough but consider this:

Both of the Chiefs TD "drives" were aided by the refs.

They gifted us with 40 yards on a bogus pass interference and with a 30-yard field on the bogus fumble.

Basically the only way we were scoring a TD in that game was the refs.

Without a running game Cassel couldn't lead a real drive worth a shit in that game, and he proved it in overtime.

I think that's an unfair statement to make given that the 2nd play was a designed screen to Moeaki that was blown up and the 3rd down play, there was nobody open.

I was originally pissed at Cassel for not doing better in OT. But looking back at the tape, I don't think that was his fault. Not this game. To me, the biggest reason we lost OT was Charlie Weis, not Cassel.

TEX 11-09-2010 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 7161473)
I think that's an unfair statement to make given that the 2nd play was a designed screen to Moeaki that was blown up and the 3rd down play, there was nobody open.

I was originally pissed at Cassel for not doing better in OT. But looking back at the tape, I don't think that was his fault. Not this game. To me, the biggest reason we lost OT was Charlie Weis, not Cassel.

I agree in part. Cassel did his job on the last drive of the 4th quarter. He got the ball to Bowe, it was a bit under thrown but very "catchable." We all know what happened. The moment was there - Bowe didn't seize it. The game never should have gone into OT.

boogblaster 11-09-2010 06:29 PM

We're building .. in need of a couple WRs .. another LBer .. another good OLman .. and draft a QBOTF .......

BigMeatballDave 11-09-2010 06:37 PM

Matt Cassel is hurting Matt Cassel.

MahiMike 11-09-2010 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7160753)
Why can Manning and Rivers make practice squad guys look like seasoned vets right from the start??

Come on. That's not fair.

The Franchise 11-09-2010 06:57 PM

Why is that there is always a ****ing excuse for Matt Cassel....but everyone around him gets shit on?

FFS. The common person in all of this is Cassel. It falls on him.

chiefzilla1501 11-09-2010 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 7161561)
Why is that there is always a ****ing excuse for Matt Cassel....but everyone around him gets shit on?

FFS. The common person in all of this is Cassel. It falls on him.

I'm pretty sure there are a handful on CP who do that. And a massive amount of people who are so thirsty for Cassel blood that they refuse to believe that anybody but Cassel could have ****ed up a play, even when evidence shows it's not true.

In this case, based on what I've seen from the video, the end of the game is a lot more on the receivers and Weis than it is on Cassel.

milkman 11-09-2010 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 7161581)
I'm pretty sure there are a handful on CP who do that. And a massive amount of people who are so thirsty for Cassel blood that they refuse to believe that anybody but Cassel could have ****ed up a play, even when evidence shows it's not true.

In this case, based on what I've seen from the video, the end of the game is a lot more on the receivers and Weis than it is on Cassel.

You know, I agree that the drop by Bowe is on Bowe at the end of the day.

However, I also believe that a consistent QB, not a great QB, makes receivers look pretty good because of their consistency.

Trent Green serves as an example of that.

An inconsistent QB makes inconsistent receivers look worse than they are.

In other words, Cassel's inconsistency contributes to Bowe's inconsistency.

chiefzilla1501 11-09-2010 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7161602)
You know, I agree that the drop by Bowe is on Bowe at the end of the day.

However, I also believe that a consistent QB, not a great QB, makes receivers look pretty good because of their consistency.

Trent Green serves as an example of that.

An inconsistent QB makes inconsistent receivers look worse than they are.

In other words, Cassel's inconsistency contributes to Bowe's inconsistency.

Our QB isn't very good. I just have issues when we use hatred for our QB to make excuses for our receivers when they don't play well. In this particular OT, they didn't get open.

To your point about consistency, yeah, I think that's definitely entirely possible. But against Oakland at the end of regulation and in OT, I don't believe it applies.

milkman 11-09-2010 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 7161695)
Our QB isn't very good. I just have issues when we use hatred for our QB to make excuses for our receivers when they don't play well. In this particular OT, they didn't get open.

To your point about consistency, yeah, I think that's definitely entirely possible. But against Oakland at the end of regulation and in OT, I don't believe it applies.

Bowe has to make that catch, no question.

Just another observation about the reasons that Cassel is a target.

chiefzilla1501 11-09-2010 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7161704)
Bowe has to make that catch, no question.

Just another observation about the reasons that Cassel is a target.

Noted. For the record, I don't have a problem with Cassel being a target. Most of the time he deserves it.

Just Passin' By 11-09-2010 08:13 PM

Not referring to Cassel, but talking in general...

Shitty receivers make QBs look worse than they are.

Shitty O-lines make QBs look worse than they are.

Shitty running games make QBs look worse than they are.


The QB position is dependent upon other positions for success in a way that's unlike every other position on the field. Jeff Garcia could play in Philly, S.F. and, to a lesser extent, even Tampa Bay, but he shit the bed in Cleveland and Detroit. People who ignore the impact of dropped passes, lack of separation, poor route running and the like really have no business trying to evaluate QBs.

milkman 11-09-2010 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 7161722)
Not referring to Cassel, but talking in general...

Shitty receivers make QBs look worse than they are.

Shitty O-lines make QBs look worse than they are.

Shitty running games make QBs look worse than they are.


The QB position is dependent upon other positions for success in a way that's unlike every other position on the field. Jeff Garcia could play in Philly, S.F. and, to a lesser extent, even Tampa Bay, but he shit the bed in Cleveland and Detroit. People who ignore the impact of dropped passes, lack of separation, poor route running and the like really have no business trying to evaluate QBs.

On the flipside, shitty Qbs make WRs look worse than they are.
Shitty QBs make O-lines look worse than they are.
Shitty QBs make running games look worse than they are.

See David Carr.

jd1020 11-09-2010 08:33 PM

Cassel has a hard time hitting a screen pass let alone a down field pass. He's a back up quarterback at best. If Pioli has any brain he'll cut Cassel at the end of the season and avoid paying the ridiculous 7.5m bonus and resign Croyle. Croyle can easily do what they are asking of Cassel but Croyle has the confidence to throw a pass beyond 10 yards.

Depending on how the rest of the season goes and what draft pick the Chiefs end up with I think theres a real chance that Baldwin would land in the Chiefs lap. I dont see the Chiefs making the playoffs. We'll probably split with the Broncos, Rivers is going to go off on us in SD, and I wouldn't be suprised if Bradford lights us up. That puts us at 10-6 at best but I wouldnt be suprised if we find a way to lose one other game for the same reason we lost to the Raiders and 9-7 isn't going to beat the Chargers. So if we can get Baldwin, start Croyle and get a backup in the 2nd/3rd rounds because by week 3 Croyle will be on the IR. Otherwise I think we need to take a QB in the first round.

chiefzilla1501 11-09-2010 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7161738)
On the flipside, shitty Qbs make WRs look worse than they are.
Shitty QBs make O-lines look worse than they are.
Shitty QBs make running games look worse than they are.

See David Carr.

Agreed on all those points.

But in the case of the Chiefs, on the WRs, there's give and take. Moeaki is the only receiver on this team that consistently gets separation. I think Bowe is a good receiver at positioning his body to make a catch once it's in the air, but I don't think he's an overly consistent route runner. And McCluster would be so much more effective if we had an effective receiver at #1 who can stretch the field.

Again, not making excuses for Cassel because he misses way too many passes that he should hit. But no doubt we are missing some very critical pieces at receiver.

Just Passin' By 11-09-2010 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7161738)
On the flipside, shitty Qbs make WRs look worse than they are.
Shitty QBs make O-lines look worse than they are.
Shitty QBs make running games look worse than they are.

See David Carr.

You're absolutely correct. But, as I noted before, this was about the receivers hurting the QB/team, not the other way around.

Also, just a quick note, specific to the Chiefs:

The O-line and the WRs sucked in 2009, regardless of who the QB was going to be. This year, the O-line's been improved, but the WRs still suck.

That's independent of Cassel.

chiefzilla1501 11-09-2010 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 7161782)
You're absolutely correct. But, as I noted before, this was about the receivers hurting the QB/team, not the other way around.

Also, just a quick note, specific to the Chiefs:

The O-line and the WRs sucked in 2009, regardless of who the QB was going to be. This year, the O-line's been improved, but the WRs still suck.

That's independent of Cassel.

There are more than enough examples of Cassel misfiring to an open receiver in 2010. It's not independent of Cassel.

FloridaMan88 11-09-2010 08:49 PM

The Chiefs had a chance to sign TO this past offseason.

milkman 11-09-2010 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 7161782)
You're absolutely correct. But, as I noted before, this was about the receivers hurting the QB/team, not the other way around.

Also, just a quick note, specific to the Chiefs:

The O-line and the WRs sucked in 2009, regardless of who the QB was going to be. This year, the O-line's been improved, but the WRs still suck.

That's independent of Cassel.

Yes the O-Line was bad and the WRs sucked, but Matt Cassel made them look worse than they were, and still makes them look worse than they are.

salame 11-09-2010 08:51 PM

I wish we would had been able to draft revis instead of bowe

milkman 11-09-2010 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 7161799)
The Chiefs had a chance to sign TO this past offseason.

And thankfully they didn't.

googlegoogle 11-09-2010 09:34 PM

Even the commentators said no one on KC receiving corps could get open therefore the need to resort to screens which the Raiders laughed off.

googlegoogle 11-09-2010 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7161802)
Yes the O-Line was bad and the WRs sucked, but Matt Cassel made them look worse than they were, and still makes them look worse than they are.

So Cassel should throw the ball to himself ?? ROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.