Would You Greg Little?
If he slips to the our pick in the 2nd do you still pull the trigger on this guy? We are still really thin at WR and Little, Baldwin, and Bowe could give us one of the most dynamic WR's core for years to come. With Charles at RB that's a lot of weapons on the offense.
We could still come back and take Powe and Sheppard in the 3rd to sure up the DT and MLB spot and possibly get that RT in the 4th. That lives the only major hole at OLB which hopefully Sheffield can step up and take and of course FA eventually to any remainging holes. Would you... the whole thing? |
I would Torrey Smith, if somehow he fell. I might Hankerson as well.
But those guys won't drop to us obviously. But, I would. |
Yes. In a heart beat.
|
No. Stupid waste of resources.
BPA is great, but only to an extent. |
NO! NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT NT
|
WR is still a need for KC. The rules favor a passing game, so you need to be at least 3 deep. The rumblings of King and Gretz on Bowe not being around for a 2nd contract are bothersome. If you have Little or Smith or Hankerson rated ahead of Houston/Sheard/Ayers/Reed/OL then take them.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think we have way too many holes to be blowing picks on luxuries like WR when our Oline, NT, and LBs could use attention. I sure would love to have Mt Cody (or Raji instead of Jackson but that's another scenario) instead of the stupid little offensive toy they drafted last year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Packers chose Nelson at the top of the 2nd despite having Driver and Jennings so it has some merrit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
However, if this team had receivers in that playoff game, they would have had a chance to compete. I'm not sure I would make the selection, but it wouldn't be the worst decision for this team. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No.
We just got the big, dynamic, stretch the field, crossbar killing red zone threat receiver - picking Little would be slightly redundant. Besides, Little does have some character issues that I think puts him outside the possibility of the Chiefs selecting him. With guys like Sam Acho (OLB), Rod Hudson (C), Ben Ijalana (RT), Akeem Ayers (OLB) and Ryan Williams (RB) potentially there for the Chiefs in the second round, I think that they need to look somewhere other than WR. However, I wouldn't mind a sure hands, possession type receiver in the third or fourth like Austin Pettis or Vincent Brown. |
Quote:
|
No, no, no! We need OLB or NT help in Round Two!
|
No. Again, like Hankerson, but even moreso, Little does not complement Bowe and Baldwin. He's another big, physical WR. If we grab another wideout it should be a faster, quicker, shifty guy who lines up in the slot and finds holes in the secondary. Little, Bowe, Baldwin, and Hankerson are all guys you line up on the outside.
|
Quote:
I love your enthusiasm, but I will believe it when I see it. I never trust any draft pick to work out, much less excel. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Good post. |
strict BPA in the 2nd round and i don't really care what position it is, outside of Kicker/Punter.
we can use a quality player just about anywhere |
I'll tell you, I didn't watch college football this past season as much as I have in the past, which is the reason I haven't discussed any of thes players.
But the receiver I am most intrigued with that remains in this draft is Edmund Gates. Where is expected to be picked, and how does he fit with Bowe and Baldwin? Specifically, does he he a skillset that would work in the slot? |
Quote:
|
I'm open to anything, but the Chiefs have alot of holes to fill. I mean, besides the obvious NT and probably a OLB/ILB depending on the situation, I still feel that KC still need some depth for safety play (remember how bad the safety position was when Lewis got hurt?) and some o-linemen as well as a back-up RB (Thomas Jones isn't getting it done too much) as well as a back-up QB (Brokie? Damn)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
QB - Yes WR - Yes OT - Yes OG - If water leaves, yes C - Yes, big time RB - Yes (a little bit) TE - probably not, but if they are going to run a lot, double TE's would work DE - Probably can't considering but there is a need NT - YES, big time LB - Yes (ILB and OLB) CB - not really but you can never have too many S - Depends on how much you like Lewis, still need backups because we've had a lot of injuries back there 2 maybe 3 positions on entire team where we don't have a real need. BPA baby |
It will be addressed in FA.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.