ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Broncos are starting Orton because they don't want to pay Tebow (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249518)

Hammock Parties 09-05-2011 03:28 PM

Broncos are starting Orton because they don't want to pay Tebow
 
This is hilarious. Absolutely hilarious. It will be even funnier if they dump Tebow to draft a "cheaper" franchise QB.

http://forums.denverbroncos.com/showthread.php?t=192962

Quote:

Contracts Dictated which QB Started

Lost in all of our fan hoopla about the idea of these QBs competing to start was the inevitable fact that Tebow was not going to start. No chance, was never going to happen. And here's the factual contract data as to why:

Written into Tebow's contract is this qualifier "Tebow's contract DOUBLES from 11.25 million to 22.50 million if he plays 55% of the time in TWO of his first three seasons".

Meanwhile, Orton's contract this season? 9 Million, 6 million guaranteed. So, since no team would trade for Orton at franchise player money, and since Orton refused to renegotiate his contract, the only remaining option was to cut him and pay the 6 million. We weren't going to bench him and pay 9 million.

So, this was the dilemma, pay Orton millions and millions to not play AND double Tebow's contract, or keep Tebow on the bench and not hitting escalators while getting something for the 6 million you owe Orton no matter what.

And you have to wonder about Tebow's future here due to his contract. A contract signed before the rookie wage scale. If Tebow plays 70% of the snaps in 2013, his contract doubles to 22.5 million and if the team makes multiple playoffs under Tebow and he achieves leaguewide awards his contract triples to 33 million.

Meanwhile, the #1 overall selection this year, Cam Newton's contract? 4 Years, 22 million. Andrew Luck is looking at the same deal. And there are 3-4 other QBs likely to go in the Top 20 in the next draft for much cheaper deals in the strongest QB draft in quite some time.

And what about Brady Quinn you might ask? Well, if he plays 70% of our snaps, his contract goes from 700,000 to 6.6 million due to a 5.9 million escalator bonus.

Do you think this was a fair QB competition? Hell no. Orton was never not going to start. Not with Bowlen in a financial crises and unable to even make waiver claims because of financial concerns. Let alone not even being competitive on the open free agent market. We weren't going to pay Orton millions not to play.

We have this big Quinn versus Tebow versus Orton debate, and there probably was a true battle for the #2 spot (which we laughingly refused to name), but there was never a competition for the #1 spot. Finances dictated that. Period.

So if you wonder why Tebow or Quinn didn't play with the starters, or Orton with the 2nd team, this is why. The team knew what direction it was going months and months ago despite telling us it was a competition. Lying has been standard for the front office this offseason despite declarations of openness. Sure they tried to trade Orton's albatross of a contract, but no team was taking that unless Kyle re-negotiated and he made it clear he would not absent a pricy long term deal. Nobody in the NFL wants to give him that. And as for all the chatter about "Tebow being terrible", almost guaranteed it was planted by the front office to try and justify to fans why he wasn't given a chance to start.

Too bad for them the contract information was made public. A little research sure sheds some light on an awful lot of questions and confusing bait and switch comments by EFX.

Gadzooks 09-05-2011 03:29 PM

Broncos are starting Orton because Tebow sucks.

KurtCobain 09-05-2011 03:33 PM

LMAO the dooonkeys are such a ****ing joke.

Hammock Parties 09-05-2011 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 7880477)
Broncos are starting Orton because Tebow sucks.

Tebow was pretty decent last year and this preseason.

No reason to keep him on the bench and halt his development.

Except DOLLADOLLABILLSYALL

Easy 6 09-05-2011 03:35 PM

Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble, drive a wedge in donkeyland on the double.

MagicHef 09-05-2011 03:42 PM

Who in the world wrote Tebow's contract? Oh, wait, nevermind.

CrazyPhuD 09-05-2011 03:43 PM

WTF...he won't play for mana? What kind of messiah is he?

Ebolapox 09-05-2011 03:52 PM

yeah, THAT'S the reason that he's not starting.

jspchief 09-05-2011 03:57 PM

You know it's funny. An incentive laden contract in an ideal world is a win/win situation. You get the job done, you get paid accordingly. Signing that type of contract is almost admirable.

Then you hear this and it gives players/agents ammunition to avoid that kind of thing, and we end up giving guarantees to everyone, bums and stars alike.

jspchief 09-05-2011 04:00 PM

And to be clear, I don't buy into this theory.

It has to be more profitable for the franchise to win, particularly with a guy that has potential to become a fan favorite. I don't believe NFL franchises would sacrifice wins to save $11m.

Gadzooks 09-05-2011 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7880474)
This is hilarious. Absolutely hilarious. It will be even funnier if they dump Tebow to draft a "cheaper" franchise QB.

So, in summary, Tebow was drafted as a Vick like project, meaning they need to teach him how to throw a football.
The incentive laden contracts for Tebow and Quinn prevent either from furthering their careers and Tebow still can't throw a football.
Nice job Broncos :clap:

bowener 09-05-2011 04:45 PM

I, for one, admire the Bronco's new approach to ****ing over their fans, players, and selves with horrible contracts and average players (and the combination of the two).

vailpass 09-05-2011 04:52 PM

I guess when you have over 111,000 posts your emphasis is on quantity over quality. This OP is just plain stupid.

scorpio 09-05-2011 05:04 PM

Read something speculative on the OrangeMane, better go post about it on Chiefs Planet.

CoMoChief 09-05-2011 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7880474)
This is hilarious. Absolutely hilarious. It will be even funnier if they dump Tebow to draft a "cheaper" franchise QB.

http://forums.denverbroncos.com/showthread.php?t=192962

Well if Tebow was better than Orton, I believe Tebow would start.

But he's not....not even close from what I've heard.

Still funny they drafted him though....no one in their right minds thought he was gonna be shit in the NFL...at most a project...and the donks spend a 1st on him ROFL.

listopencil 09-05-2011 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7880486)
Tebow was pretty decent last year and this preseason.

No reason to keep him on the bench and halt his development.

Except DOLLADOLLABILLSYALL

LMAO What, did they kick you off Orangemane again so you have to troll here now?

whoman69 09-05-2011 05:16 PM

If I understand the cap correctly, the Brocos are charged at the higher number anyway

Okie_Apparition 09-05-2011 05:31 PM

I thought they only drafted him anyway for the jersey sales

Ugly Duck 09-05-2011 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7880474)
So, this was the dilemma, pay Orton millions and millions to not play AND double Tebow's contract, or keep Tebow on the bench and not hitting escalators while getting something for the 6 million you owe Orton no matter what.

Trade a 2nd and a 3rd and a 4th to use a 1st on a guy that you bench so his salary doesn't escalate. Sounds almost as stoopid as taking Jamarcus at #1....

Hammock Parties 09-05-2011 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ugly Duck (Post 7880682)
Trade a 2nd and a 3rd and a 4th to use a 1st on a guy that you bench so his salary doesn't escalate. Sounds almost as stoopid as taking Jamarcus at #1....

It's in the same ballpark right now.

DaFace 09-05-2011 05:52 PM

...or maybe Tebow looked like crap in the preseason. Occam's Razor leads me to believe that's most likely the case.

jspchief 09-05-2011 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 7880647)
If I understand the cap correctly, the Brocos are charged at the higher number anyway

Yes, but losing an additional $11m of cap space is not the same thing as losing an additional $11m of cash.

ThatRaceCardGuy 09-05-2011 05:54 PM

This one is my favorite...
"Well ya... we all know this was the truth that were paying attention. Tebow sure did well statistically in the preseason for being so awful.

Funny or the worst part is fans bought into the media created Tebow is terrible talk... It's pretty sad what people will believe without seeing things for or with their own eyes.

I do a little thing called the eye test. I see what my eyeball tell me.. My eyeballs tell me Tebow isn't near as far off or as bad as some of you want to pretend... He will make a great qb next year. for who I am not sure.. I hope it's the broncos. I think the broncos go 10-6 worst case 8-8 this year... the media says they are 4-12 to 5-11, I just don't see it... Anyway more people should try the eyeball test then believing what people write that they don't know and don't know their motive...
"

Donk fan has to be the dumbest fan base in the NFL...outside of Raider Nation.

Hammock Parties 09-05-2011 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 7880644)
Well if Tebow was better than Orton, I believe Tebow would start.

But he's not....not even close from what I've heard.

No one really can say, because there was never a fair competition:

Facts:

1. Tebow showed great potential at the end of last season.

2. Orton looked like shit.

3. The Broncos barely let Tebow play any meaningful snaps this preseason, including none with the starters.

4. Tebow played pretty well in those snaps.

The excuse for Orton "winning" the starting job is that he outperformed Tebow in training camp.

I've literally never heard of a legit "open competition" with one of the participants getting garbage for preseason snaps.

This is all about DOLLADOLLABILLSYALL

MoreLemonPledge 09-05-2011 06:01 PM

I'll say it: As a Chiefs fan I would be more frightened of Tebow.

MagicHef 09-05-2011 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7880698)
No one really can say, because there was never a fair competition:

Facts:

1. Tebow showed great potential at the end of last season.

2. Orton looked like shit.

3. The Broncos barely let Tebow play any meaningful snaps this preseason, including none with the starters.

4. Tebow played pretty well in those snaps.

The excuse for Orton "winning" the starting job is that he outperformed Tebow in training camp.

I've literally never heard of a legit "open competition" with one of the participants getting garbage for preseason snaps.

This is all about DOLLADOLLABILLSYALL

This. Also, the only time that Tebow got any snaps in training camp with the 1s was when Orton missed practice for the birth of his daughter. There never was any competition.

whoman69 09-05-2011 07:22 PM

Orton started out the year on fire, but they weren't winning because of their defense. Hence Tebow comes in as QBotF. I think when people are saying he did horrible, they are saying that his mechanics are still poor even in his second year in the league.

Mile High Mania 09-05-2011 07:38 PM

Anyone that thinks Tebow is on the bench only due to $ is insane.

Phobia 09-05-2011 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 7880647)
If I understand the cap correctly, the Brocos are charged at the higher number anyway

Don't think you understand it correctly. Bonuses are charged against the cap under their likelihood to be earned. That bonus is not likely to be earned and is only charged at a small percentage. If it's not earned at all it is credited back to the team the following season.

DTLB58 09-05-2011 07:41 PM

No biggie, Players are sat all the time because of incentives in contracts at the end of the season. Plus, Orton is just plain and simply the better player.

If they really didn't want to PAY him they wouldn't have just paid him the roster bonus he just got and cut him instead.

Phobia 09-05-2011 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 7880913)
Anyone that thinks Tebow is on the bench only due to $ is insane.

Precisely. Otherwise, a dozen overpaid QB's in this league would be riding the bench.

Hammock Parties 09-05-2011 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 7880913)
Anyone that thinks Tebow is on the bench only due to $ is insane.

Quite right, Mile High Moron.

He's also on the bench because he sucks.

Saul Good 09-05-2011 07:47 PM

If you were a Broncos fan, what would you want them to do?

I would want them to roll the dice with Tebow. They aren't making the playoffs either way, so you might as well see what you have. If he sucks, you're in the Andrew Luck sweepstakes, so that works as well.

Marcellus 09-05-2011 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7880938)
If you were a Broncos fan, what would you want them to do?

I would want them to roll the dice with Tebow. They aren't making the playoffs either way, so you might as well see what you have. If he sucks, you're in the Andrew Luck sweepstakes, so that works as well.

If Red That was a Bronco fan.

Setsuna 09-05-2011 08:07 PM

I have a noobtastic question. Why is GifHorse neg repped to high heaven?

MagicHef 09-05-2011 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 7880913)
Anyone that thinks Tebow is on the bench only due to $ is insane.

I don't think that's really the issue here. I think it's more the fact that the guy that lead the team to a 3-10 record last year and was very close to being traded is suddenly the unquestioned starter, while neither of the guys that were supposed to be competing for the #1 spot are given any shot at competing at all. It's just weird, honestly.

Setsuna 09-05-2011 08:11 PM

Seems to me like the Broncos organization is scared that Tebow will succeed. Alluding to the playoffs and awards section of his contract. Either way I don't want him in Denver. They will fail for years to come.

Marcellus 09-05-2011 08:15 PM

I think the thread title should read,

Broncos are starting Orton because they don't want to pay Tebow since he sucks even though he tries, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really,hard....at least 2 more reallys harder than any other QB in the NFL.

Hammock Parties 09-05-2011 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna (Post 7881005)
I have a noobtastic question. Why is GifHorse neg repped to high heaven?

Mod abuse.

JoeyChuckles 09-05-2011 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna (Post 7881005)
I have a noobtastic question. Why is GifHorse neg repped to high heaven?

Wondering the same thing.

Marcellus 09-05-2011 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna (Post 7881005)
I have a noobtastic question. Why is GifHorse neg repped to high heaven?

Clay looks good in Red.

Ugly Duck 09-05-2011 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 7881021)
I think it's more the fact that the guy that lead the team to a 3-10 record last year and was very close to being traded is suddenly the unquestioned starter

...............http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/5230/excellental.jpg

http://i426.photobucket.com/albums/p...attachment.jpg

...............http://extras.mnginteractive.com/liv...p1_GALLERY.jpg

Quesadilla Joe 09-06-2011 12:58 AM

So you are quoting some random poster from a random Broncos message board???

And whoever posted that is a moron. The Broncos would LOVE to start Tebow because he is the most marketable athlete alive. A productive, Pro Bowl caliber Tebow would give Pat Bowlen more cash than he knows what to do with. He just isn't ready yet...... Why tarnish your golden goose when you can wait a couple of years and reap the benefits?

CrazyPhuD 09-06-2011 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna (Post 7881005)
I have a noobtastic question. Why is GifHorse neg repped to high heaven?

It's in the spirit of Red Friday.

RealSNR 09-06-2011 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 7881417)
So you are quoting some random poster from a random Broncos message board???

And whoever posted that is a moron. The Broncos would LOVE to start Tebow because he is the most marketable athlete alive. A productive, Pro Bowl caliber Tebow would give Pat Bowlen more cash than he knows what to do with. He just isn't ready yet...... Why tarnish your golden goose when you can wait a couple of years and reap the benefits?

Golden goose? You're telling me if the Broncos get their shot at Andrew Luck next year they won't take him?

There is no platinum goose, dildo-eater

Quesadilla Joe 09-06-2011 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 7881423)
Golden goose? You're telling me if the Broncos get their shot at Andrew Luck next year they won't take him?

There is no platinum goose, dildo-eater

They probably would, but the entire reason they are starting Kyle Orton is because he gives us a better chance to win.

Tebow isn't ready, the Broncos wished he was the best pure QB on the roster at this time but he just isn't right now.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-06-2011 07:23 AM

He wasn't even the 2nd best pure QB on the roster and that is quite sad. He was 4th best according to a twitter post, so it must be true :)

Tom_A_Hawk 09-06-2011 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 7881417)
So you are quoting some random poster from a random Broncos message board???

But quoting you as fact is correct? LMAO

Quesadilla Joe 09-06-2011 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom_A_Hawk (Post 7881526)
But quoting you as fact is correct? LMAO

GoChiefs made this thread to sound like it was fact. And it is 100% bullshit speculation.

Sofa King 09-06-2011 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 7881417)
So you are quoting some random poster from a random Broncos message board???

And whoever posted that is a moron. The Broncos would LOVE to start Tebow because he is the most marketable athlete alive. A productive, Pro Bowl caliber Tebow would give Pat Bowlen more cash than he knows what to do with. He just isn't ready yet...... Why tarnish your golden goose when you can wait a couple of years and reap the benefits?

LMAO

http://www.rave.ca/en/image/full/387767/

Chiefshrink 09-06-2011 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 7880477)
Broncos are starting Orton because Tebow sucks.

Precisely:thumb:

If they truly wanted Luck "for sure" (which I'm sure they do)they would start Tebow every game this season. But Tebow is sooooooooooooo bad it would be too obvious and Elway has to show at least he sees what everyone else sees and how can you start this overrated college QB who can't throw or move the ball while Orton effectively produces???

It comes down to "playing to win" at all times and the fans won't tolerate failure for very long. How did the donkey fans feel when Orton went 6-0 ?

King_Chief_Fan 09-06-2011 10:52 AM

we should help them out.

Orton or Tebow can come help the Chiefs.

I haven't seen anyone playing that position on the Chiefs getting the job done.

whoman69 09-06-2011 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 7881787)
we should help them out.

Orton or Tebow can come help the Chiefs.

I haven't seen anyone playing that position on the Chiefs getting the job done.

You've got to be smoking to think Tebow wouldn't be 4th string on our lineup.

Fish 09-06-2011 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 7882303)
You've got to be smoking to think Tebow wouldn't be 4th string on our lineup.

Actually we could really use a decent TE. Tebow would probably start ahead of Pope.

MagicHef 09-06-2011 05:16 PM

Am I safe in assuming Clay is the only one on this board that watched Tebow's starts last year and his snaps in the preseason this year? He's the only person that seems to have an opinion of Tebow that is anywhere close to realistic.

Hammock Parties 09-06-2011 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 7882851)
Am I safe in assuming Clay is the only one on this board that watched Tebow's starts last year and his snaps in the preseason this year? He's the only person that seems to have an opinion of Tebow that is anywhere close to realistic.

I think Tim Tebow sucks to be honest with you.

I also think not even giving the guy a chance to take the job away from a guy who is taking the Broncos nowhere is bush league.

Dave Lane 09-06-2011 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7880628)
I guess when you have over 111,000 posts your emphasis is on quantity over quality. This OP is just plain stupid.

Vailpass with his usual reading fail.

whoman69 09-06-2011 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 7882851)
Am I safe in assuming Clay is the only one on this board that watched Tebow's starts last year and his snaps in the preseason this year? He's the only person that seems to have an opinion of Tebow that is anywhere close to realistic.

So what's realistic? Ex-QB announcers are saying the guy has horrible footwork, accuracy and is nowhere near where he should be. Is it realistic to think that in this age that a QB can have a 50% completion rating and be effective?

Easy 6 09-06-2011 06:22 PM

Bottom line, Fox isnt creative nor offensive minded enough to know what to do with the guy... the day mcdaniels left is the day Tebows future in dinver took a dive.

He should follow josh to stl next year or he'll be a new age Eric Crouch that doesnt fit anywhere, at any position.

Setsuna 09-06-2011 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7881066)
Mod abuse.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 7881081)
Clay looks good in Red.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD (Post 7881420)
It's in the spirit of Red Friday.

LOL. Well that's awesome. That username is genius though.

Ugly Duck 09-06-2011 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 7881417)
Tebow.... is the most marketable athlete alive.

The 4th stringer?
http://tweetgif.com/viewimg.php?widt...dccc58b0c4.gif

Backwards Masking 09-06-2011 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ugly Duck (Post 7883089)

Don't worry, he'll be 3rd string ahead of DeJesus soon enough. Tebow'll never be able to score four touchdowns in a single game like Ole #33.

MagicHef 09-06-2011 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7882859)
I think Tim Tebow sucks to be honest with you.

Of course you do. I think Cassel, Palko and Stanzi suck, that's the nature of rivals. I'm just saying that "played pretty well" is much more accurate than "can't throw."

lcarus 09-06-2011 08:42 PM

So the "chatter of Tebow being terrible" was somehow planted by the front office to....everyone on the planet? I guess they just brainwashed us somehow. Maybe they paid off T-Mobile to send some kind of signal in their commercials to make us all think Tim Tebow sucks? It definitely might have something to do with that really hot girl in the pink dresses. She always has given me a funky vibe. Well...a couple of funky vibes. Man she's hot.

lcarus 09-06-2011 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 7883323)
Of course you do. I think Cassel, Palko and Stanzi suck, that's the nature of rivals. I'm just saying that "played pretty well" is much more accurate than "can't throw."

Most Chiefs fans here think Cassel, Palko, and Stanzi suck.

MagicHef 09-06-2011 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 7883363)
Most Chiefs fans here think Cassel, Palko, and Stanzi suck.

Well, that's probably because they do.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-06-2011 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 7883748)
Well, that's probably because they do.

Meh, they'd still be ahead of Tebow in terms of QB play. Who was that scrub 3rd stringer that was outplaying him????

lcarus 09-07-2011 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 7883748)
Well, that's probably because they do.

Maybe so, but I'm holding out hope for Dick Stanzi.

bigbucks24 09-07-2011 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7882859)
I think Tim Tebow sucks to be honest with you.

I also think not even giving the guy a chance to take the job away from a guy who is taking the Broncos nowhere is bush league.

I think it is clear to almost everyone that Orton gives them a better chance to win some games this year. And if they go with Tebow, it really means they don't care about wins this year, but want to see what they have in Tebow for the future. If that is true, why do they start Dawkins? Or Bailey? They give them a better chance of winning, but probably won't be around when the Broncos are ready to win (if Tebow is in fact, a good QB). It they care about wins (and I assume most of the fanbase does care about wins), then they play Orton until such time as Tebow shows that he can digest the entire playbook, run the entire offense, go through is progressions and make accurate throws.

MagicHef 09-07-2011 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7883765)
Meh, they'd still be ahead of Tebow in terms of QB play. Who was that scrub 3rd stringer that was outplaying him????

If you're talking about the article that quoted "confidential sources" and was refuted by the Broncos the very next day, it was Adam Weber. If you're going by actual performance, Tebow clearly outperformed everyone he was given an opportunity to compete against.

Hammock Parties 09-07-2011 01:03 AM

It's NOT clear that Orton gives them the better chance.

They never gave Tebow an opportunity to show what he could do.

Backwards Masking 09-07-2011 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7883845)
It's NOT clear that Orton gives them the better chance.

They never gave Tebow an opportunity to show what he could do.

It's really hilarious to see this all play out. I'm telling you man, Elways sabotaging the Qb position to make sure he's the only Bronco in his lifetime to ever get a ring. Nothing else makes sense, unless Horseface believes Orton and this team can take them to promised land THIS YEAR. Which I have to doubt, but then I see these decisions....and wonder.

whoman69 09-07-2011 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7883845)
It's NOT clear that Orton gives them the better chance.

They never gave Tebow an opportunity to show what he could do.

Has he earned that? Second year and his mechanics are still not there.

Hammock Parties 09-07-2011 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 7884349)
Has he earned that? Second year and his mechanics are still not there.

He was decent for a rookie in three games last year....hell yes he earned a shot.

whoman69 09-07-2011 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7884358)
He was decent for a rookie in three games last year....hell yes he earned a shot.

He was put in there to see what he could do in a lost season. If he still has the poor mechanics and will not hit for a good % of his passes, he hasn't done the work. He hasn't earned a shot just because he's a first rounder.

vailpass 09-07-2011 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking (Post 7883978)
It's really hilarious to see this all play out. I'm telling you man, Elways sabotaging the Qb position to make sure he's the only Bronco in his lifetime to ever get a ring. Nothing else makes sense, unless Horseface believes Orton and this team can take them to promised land THIS YEAR. Which I have to doubt, but then I see these decisions....and wonder.

LMAO


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.