ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Rodney Hudson (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253009)

Direckshun 11-27-2011 10:53 PM

Rodney Hudson
 
Should be our starting LG going forward.

We had a yard to three yards of push on the Steeler DL all day.

Part of this, I absolutely have to believe, was thanks to Hudson's great work.

He was great in pass defense, good in the run game against one of the league's best, and excellent at the second level.

We got a winner there. I don't even know if I'd move him to center when it's all said and done.

PunkinDrublic 11-27-2011 10:55 PM

You may be right, but who do we get to replace Weigman?

OnTheWarpath15 11-27-2011 10:56 PM

He looked good tonight, as did most of the rest of the OL.

ILChief 11-27-2011 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunkinDrublic (Post 8149296)
You may be right, but who do we get to replace Weigman?

Draft

Direckshun 11-27-2011 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunkinDrublic (Post 8149296)
You may be right, but who do we get to replace Weigman?

I don't pretend to know where the free agency market is.

This is going to be completely assinine but maybe Darryl Harris can come along.

NJChiefsFan 11-27-2011 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 8149311)
Draft

I would rather move Albert to LG and Hudson to C and use a pick on a tackle instead of one on a tackle and center.

the Talking Can 11-27-2011 10:57 PM

hudson and assowhatever are balls


and albert locked his corner down all night

KCrockaholic 11-27-2011 10:58 PM

Yeah Rodney actually looked pretty good, and he seemed to really know what he was doing, and I didn't see him lost from what I could tell. I'd still rather see him as our COTF.

jd1020 11-27-2011 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 8149319)
I would rather move Albert to LG and Hudson to C and use a pick on a tackle instead of one on a tackle and center.

So you'd rather look for 2 tackles?

the Talking Can 11-27-2011 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 8149319)
I would rather move Albert to LG and Hudson to C and use a pick on a tackle instead of one on a tackle and center.

jesus facepalm

cdcox 11-27-2011 11:00 PM

Hudson looks like a keeper. Within the next two years we still need to pick up two quality starting OL.

ILChief 11-27-2011 11:01 PM

We all know lilja will be back in there as soon as he is ready

FAX 11-27-2011 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 8149349)
Hudson looks like a keeper. Within the next two years we still need to pick up two quality starting OL.

I really like that guy. I hope to see him planting some quarterbacks next year.

FAX

Marcellus 11-27-2011 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 8149363)
I really like that guy. I hope to see him planting some quarterbacks next year.

FAX


I hope you have Hudson and Houston confused.

Direckshun 11-27-2011 11:04 PM

I'd like us to give Rodney a chance at center. Guards are usually easier to come by.

But after tonight's performance...

NJChiefsFan 11-27-2011 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8149328)
So you'd rather look for 2 tackles?

Well I guess I am still hoping they could put Gaither at RT even though that may not ever happen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8149329)
jesus facepalm

If you could promise me Albert plays like this all the time then ok lets leave him there. Lets not pretend like he hasn't had a lot of really bad days pass blocking at LT. He may be a decent LT but having a great one would be better, especially when I think Albert would be a great LG.

jd1020 11-27-2011 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 8149383)
Well I guess I am still hoping they could put Gaither at RT even though that may not ever happen.

Gaither is on a 1 year contract and cant even get on the field and we have Richardson at RT.

He wont be here.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-27-2011 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8149308)
He looked good tonight, as did most of the rest of the OL.

Naw man, if we had a REAL LT, they'd have won that game. Give Falco 10 seconds on that last throw and it's a TD. 5 straight picks on OL next year :thumb:

the Talking Can 11-27-2011 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 8149383)
Well I guess I am still hoping they could put Gaither at RT even though that may not ever happen.



If you could promise me Albert plays like this all the time then ok lets leave him there. Lets not pretend like he hasn't had a lot of really bad days pass blocking at LT. He may be a decent LT but having a great one would be better, especially when I think Albert would be a great LG.


albert has been very good this year, period...he has not had 'a lot of really bad days pass blocking'...that's a zombie lie

people don't have a damn clue...he's a quality starting LT and more than good enough for a good QB...

Pasta Little Brioni 11-27-2011 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8149427)
albert has been very good this year, period...he has not had 'a lot of really bad days pass blocking'...that's a zombie lie

people don't have a damn clue...he's a quality starting LT and more than good enough for a good QB...

Hurrrr he's no Willie Roaf Durrrrr *drool drops to floor

NJChiefsFan 11-27-2011 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8149427)
albert has been very good this year, period...he has not had 'a lot of really bad days pass blocking'...that's a zombie lie

people don't have a damn clue...he's a quality starting LT and more than good enough for a good QB...

Wasn't saying just this season. If you or the Chiefs want to keep Albert at LT thats not something I am going to fight over. I like the guy overall I just don't think he has been as solid as you are saying.

suds79 11-27-2011 11:15 PM

Of all the problems on our O-line, while he might not be great, Brandon Albert is the least of our problems.

Seriously that guy can't get any love. Some people talk about moving him every year when he's perfectly fine at LT.

Too many other holes to also throw in needing a LT. RT & Center and a slew of other positions on the team first.

Okie_Apparition 11-27-2011 11:17 PM

He's no Herb
but he'll do

Hoover 11-27-2011 11:28 PM

I love what he have in Asamoah and Hudson.

I say keep Hudson in at G for the rest of the year. He can always prepare to be our starting center next year. I also think that if you are one of those who want the Chiefs to draft a QB in round one, you better be fine with Albert at LT. We can grab a RT in the 2nd round if we want.

jd1020 11-27-2011 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 8149561)
I love what he have in Asamoah and Hudson.

I say keep Hudson in at G for the rest of the year. He can always prepare to be our starting center next year. I also think that if you are one of those who want the Chiefs to draft a QB in round one, you better be fine with Albert at LT. We can grab a RT in the 2nd round if we want.

If we are drafting around 5....

1) RG3, QB
2) Brewster, C
3) Potter, OT

suds79 11-27-2011 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 8149561)
I also think that if you are one of those who want the Chiefs to draft a QB in round one, you better be fine with Albert at LT. We can grab a RT in the 2nd round if we want.

Sounds like a plan to me.

NJChiefsFan 11-27-2011 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 8149561)
I love what he have in Asamoah and Hudson.

I say keep Hudson in at G for the rest of the year. He can always prepare to be our starting center next year. I also think that if you are one of those who want the Chiefs to draft a QB in round one, you better be fine with Albert at LT. We can grab a RT in the 2nd round if we want.

I am fine with that. I am not saying I hate Albert at LT and I certainly would take the QB in the first round over a LT by a landslide.

Hoover 11-27-2011 11:31 PM

If we can land a stud center in the draft our line is going to be solid for years to come.

Hudson's flexibility will let us grab a center or guard in the first three rounds.

philfree 11-27-2011 11:31 PM

Every part of this team sucks a dick!

Sofa King 11-27-2011 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 8149319)
I would rather move Albert to LG and Hudson to C and use a pick on a tackle instead of one on a tackle and center.

You are ****ing reeruned.

Hoover 11-27-2011 11:34 PM

This team sucks dick because...

1. We have not had a QB all year.
2. Big Time Injuries
3. Tough Schedule
4. We play up or down to the level of our competition (coaching)

NJChiefsFan 11-27-2011 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 8149585)
You are ****ing reeruned.

Damn. I guess I am the only one that still thinks Albert is a better LG. So be it.

Simply Red 11-27-2011 11:36 PM

The whole Line looked good, kudos there, I totally agree.

suds79 11-27-2011 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 8149592)
Damn. I guess I am the only one that still thinks Albert is a better LG. So be it.

It's possible he is. We don't know. I think what you're missing is what factors in if you were to move him.

- That means we then spent a 1st on a Guard. Waste.
- We have to then look for a LT. Typically the good ones are drafted in the first.
- All of a sudden we're looking for two Tackles going into next year when RT is far worse shape.
- LT is simply very, very low in our list of needs.

A move like that I think would be only for a team that is so loaded with talent, they could afford to make the move. We obviously cannot.

NJChiefsFan 11-27-2011 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8149626)
It's possible he is. We don't know. I think what you're missing is what factors in if you were to move him.

- That means we then spent a 1st on a Guard. Waste.
- We have to then look for a LT. Typically the good ones are drafted in the first.
- All of a sudden we're looking for two Tackles going into next year when RT is far worse shape.
- LT is simply very, very low in our list of needs.

A move like that I think would be only for a team that is so loaded with talent, they could afford to make the move. We obviously cannot.

I agree with all those points. This certainly isn't a subject I am going to debate. I like Albert. I think we could still do a little better at LT but the point of priorities is a very good one. I wouldn't want us wasting a high pick on a LT, especially with our QB situation.

I spending $ on a RT in FA if possible. Having 3 players in their 1st-3rd years isn't great if you are planning to put a young QB back there, although that in itself might be a pipe-dream.

Okie_Apparition 11-28-2011 12:08 AM

How many times was farm fish sacked

aturnis 11-28-2011 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 8149319)
I would rather move Albert to LG and Hudson to C and use a pick on a tackle instead of one on a tackle and center.

Gaither, Albert, Hudson, Asamoah, RT from either FA or draft...

I believe that Gaither is healthy enough. If you've payed attention to opponents field goal attempts, he is the middle man trying to block the kick, b/c he's ****ing huge. He has been stepping on the back of the longsnapper and trying his ass off to get in there to block the kick. You don't do that if you are really worried about your back, and you DEFINITELY don't ask someone with back problems to do something like that. Especially beings he's come down face first a few times.

I think, beings they had a shortened offseason, Haley didn't want wholesale change. You can see that in our draft as well. We've asked most up until this year, to play a large role and help, this year, not so much. Gaither had no offseason, so sign him for a year, an extended tryout, give him that full year to learn the playbook, then make the switch next year. Got to realize putting him at LT affects Albert too. So not only would Gaither have had to learn the entire offense in this short offseason, but Albert would have had to also.

Next year, we have a guy who had a whole year to learn, and a full offseason to get reps and make the offense second nature.

I have to believe this is true, it's my only hope we don't draft a LT #1 overall. This could be their plan and they still draft a RT #1 overall, wouldn't that be the shits? I guess it would be a solid OL though huh?

ChiefsCountry 11-28-2011 02:27 AM

Moving Albert to left guard is ****ing stupid. Gaither isn't the answer either you morons at either positon. If he was they would have him in there or mainly Baltimore wouldn't have cut him.

We need to draft a center preferably Michael Brewster from Ohio State. Right tackle I have no clue - Riley Rieff from Iowa would be good if we went the true fan route but other than sign a free agent or find something in the draft. In all honesty its not that big of a deal as Chiefs fans make it out to be.

NJChiefsFan 11-28-2011 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 8149986)
Moving Albert to left guard is ****ing stupid. Gaither isn't the answer either you morons at either positon. If he was they would have him in there or mainly Baltimore wouldn't have cut him.

We need to draft a center preferably Michael Brewster from Ohio State. Right tackle I have no clue - Riley Rieff from Iowa would be good if we went the true fan route but other than sign a free agent or find something in the draft. In all honesty its not that big of a deal as Chiefs fans make it out to be.

You don't think that RT is an issue that needs to be looked at? There certainly are ways of dealing with it, especially since RT doesn't need to be done with a 1st round pick and we also have money, but I would say its something we need to fix.

Gaither may not be the answer but teams have cut players that end up working out other places so saying that since he was cut he won't work is not entirely true. The Chiefs also play Thomas Jones so the idea that them not playing somebody proves their worth or lack-there-of is also not a lock.

FloridaMan88 11-28-2011 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 8149986)
Moving Albert to left guard is ****ing stupid. Gaither isn't the answer either you morons at either positon. If he was they would have him in there or mainly Baltimore wouldn't have cut him.

We need to draft a center preferably Michael Brewster from Ohio State. Right tackle I have no clue - Riley Rieff from Iowa would be good if we went the true fan route but other than sign a free agent or find something in the draft. In all honesty its not that big of a deal as Chiefs fans make it out to be.

The Chiefs should draft a center, a year after they drafted a center (Hudson) in the second round of the draft?

Yes that is a brilliant strategy, dumbshit.

LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAO

BigMeatballDave 11-28-2011 04:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 8149997)
The Chiefs should draft a center, a year after they drafted a center (Hudson) in the second round of the draft?

Yes that is a brilliant strategy, dumbshit.

LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAO

Umm, you are the dumbshit. Hudson was drafted to play C, but mostly played G in college. He'll be very solid at either position.

Fritz88 11-28-2011 04:48 AM

I want to see him against a more physical DL.

kcxiv 11-28-2011 05:19 AM

Moving Albert is ****ing stupid. Dont fix something thats not BROKEN

Bob Dole 11-28-2011 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8149397)
Gaither is on a 1 year contract and cant even get on the field...

He was awesome in his one (non)play appearance last night!

Red Beans 11-28-2011 06:33 AM

He looked pretty salty.

tredadda 11-28-2011 06:35 AM

Albert is not the issue on this line. It is Lilja who needs to be replaced (hopefully with Hudson), Weigman, and Richardson. What will it take for people to stop this yearly nonsense of drafting a LT and moving Albert to guard?

DaKCMan AP 11-28-2011 06:40 AM

Wiegmann will retire or not get re-signed. Hudson will start at C next year.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-28-2011 06:59 AM

Just think of how good we'd be if we had drafted Bulaga last year.

Mr_Tomahawk 02-24-2012 01:45 PM

Josh Looney ‏ @JoshLooney Close
Pioli: Rodney Hudson is ready to be a starter at center or guard. #Chiefs

Sofa King 02-24-2012 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8395483)
Josh Looney ‏ @JoshLooney Close
Pioli: Rodney Hudson is ready to be a starter at center or guard. #Chiefs

Thank you captain obvious.

****ing Looney.

Chiefnj2 02-24-2012 02:00 PM

Someone please ask Looney if Houston is ready to beat out Studebaker and start week 1.

-King- 02-24-2012 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8395523)
Someone please ask Looney if Houston is ready to beat out Studebaker and start week 1.

Didn't they already announce him as a starter?

Mr. Laz 02-24-2012 02:02 PM

If Hudson is ready for guard or center then he should start at center.

Much harder to find a center

Mr. Laz 02-24-2012 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8395523)
Someone please ask Looney if Houston is ready to beat out Studebaker and start week 1.

umm ... wasn't Houston already the full time guy at the end of last year.

BigCatDaddy 02-24-2012 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8395534)
umm ... wasn't Houston already the full time guy at the end of last year.

I think that was his point.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.