ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Matt Barkley Files NFL Paperwork (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253185)

Titty Meat 12-01-2011 09:14 PM

Matt Barkley Files NFL Paperwork
 
Blow 4 Barkley!

http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/ncf/s...-paperwork-nfl

KCrockaholic 12-01-2011 09:15 PM

Sweet.

O.city 12-01-2011 09:15 PM

Dudes gonna be a Chief. It's fate.


I am a Chief fans, my dogs name is Barkley.

There ya go.

Scorp 12-01-2011 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8160039)
Dudes gonna be a Chief. It's fate.


I am a Chief fans, my dogs name is Barkley.

There ya go.

Well my dogs name is RGIII so there's that!

O.city 12-01-2011 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scorp (Post 8160044)
Well my dogs name is RGIII so there's that!

Well it's win win.

KCrockaholic 12-01-2011 09:20 PM

USC QB's scare me so much. Although I do like Barkley, that alma mater knocks him down a bit in my book. Has there ever been a great USC QB? Palmer is the closest thing I can think of and he didn't live up to his expectations.

BigMeatballDave 12-01-2011 09:21 PM

Pioli is gonna draft Taylor Martinez...

RealSNR 12-01-2011 09:22 PM

My sister has a cat named Lucky. Does that count?

O.city 12-01-2011 09:22 PM

The thing with USC qbs is that they always have crazy amounts of talent around them cause USC is USC.


However Barkley seems a little different in that his oline isn't really that great outside of Kalil. He has really improved alot aswell with accuraccy and overall qb skills.

KCrockaholic 12-01-2011 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8160056)
The thing with USC qbs is that they always have crazy amounts of talent around them cause USC is USC.


However Barkley seems a little different in that his oline isn't really that great outside of Kalil. He has really improved alot aswell with accuraccy and overall qb skills.

I agree. But I won't believe in USC QB's until I see one.

Scorp 12-01-2011 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8160053)
My sister has a cat named Lucky. Does that count?

No No No........... It was your sisters pussy that was named Lucky. LMAO

Willie Lanier 12-01-2011 10:40 PM

Shocker

Urc Burry 12-01-2011 10:53 PM

Technically he hasn't declared... He just submitted to the draft evaluators where he will likely be picked. Granted when he sees the results he will likely declare

evolve27 12-01-2011 10:56 PM

I pray every nite that my family is safe and that we land our QBOTF with this draft. Well the QB thing is more of a hope, ha.

jlscorpio 12-01-2011 10:57 PM

I could see him and Chucky together in Miami

Spicy McHaggis 12-01-2011 11:01 PM

My friend in KC was looking for a new roommate on craigslist and he said that Matt Barkley contacted him about it, but that Matt backed out when he learned the place didn't allow pets.

evolve27 12-01-2011 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spicy McHaggis (Post 8160331)
My friend in KC was looking for a new roommate on craigslist and he said that Matt Barkley contacted him about it, but that Matt backed out when he learned the place didn't allow pets.

LMAO

Bullshit

SenselessChiefsFan 12-02-2011 09:19 AM

I have a dog named Cassel. I am surprised it is still breathing after every Chiefs game.

My cat Palko looks worried.

KC_Lee 12-02-2011 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 8160853)
I have a dog named Cassel. I am surprised it is still breathing after every Chiefs game.

My cat Palko looks worried.

Do you have a pet named Stanzi that is not allowed to play at all?

SenselessChiefsFan 12-02-2011 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 8160890)
Do you have a pet named Stanzi that is not allowed to play at all?

Yeah, I have a parrot named stanzi. He sits on the bench.

talastan 12-02-2011 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 8160894)
Yeah, I have a parrot named stanzi. He sits on the bench.

Better than *****ing about your neighbors dog named Sanchez.

Rooster 12-02-2011 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scorp (Post 8160044)
Well my dogs name is RGIII so there's that!

LMAO

I used to have a dog named Bono. :eek: There might be something to this.

whoman69 12-02-2011 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8160039)
Dudes gonna be a Chief. It's fate.


I am a Chief fans, my dogs name is Barkley.

There ya go.

My dog is named Fritz. Who can we get?

whoman69 12-02-2011 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 8160853)
I have a dog named Cassel. I am surprised it is still breathing after every Chiefs game.

My cat Palko looks worried.

Euthanasia.

Micjones 12-02-2011 11:29 AM

I don't have a dog. That tell you anything?

Sofa King 12-02-2011 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 8161238)
My dog is named Fritz. Who can we get?

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/member.php?u=11134

Good luck.

Sofa King 12-02-2011 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8161243)
I don't have a dog. That tell you anything?

You don't like it ruff?

Micjones 12-02-2011 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 8161248)
You don't like it ruff?

Lol...whut?

Warrior5 12-02-2011 12:00 PM

Barkley doesn't need a haircut... I like him.

lcarus 12-02-2011 12:06 PM

We'll pass on a USC quarterback because he is a USC quarterback, and Barkley will be the first real stud USC quarterback. Then we'll say "Damn...should have taken that USC quarterback".

I don't actually think it will play out that way, but it seems about like our luck.

Molitoth 12-02-2011 12:08 PM

I saw Barkley in an interview the other day and after the question was asked why you are ready for the NFL he answered with something along the lines of "I want to be financially secure". And while I understand everyone wants to be rich, I'd like to see my future QB talk about his love for the game, and not about money.

lcarus 12-02-2011 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 8161344)
I saw Barkley in an interview the other day and after the question was asked why you are ready for the NFL he answered with something along the lines of "I want to be financially secure". And while I understand everyone wants to be rich, I'd like to see my future QB talk about his love for the game, and not about money.

At least he's honest?



RGIII it is.

BossChief 12-02-2011 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 8161344)
I saw Barkley in an interview the other day and after the question was asked why you are ready for the NFL he answered with something along the lines of "I want to be financially secure". And while I understand everyone wants to be rich, I'd like to see my future QB talk about his love for the game, and not about money.

Thats definitely a strike.

Do you have a link to that interview?

I know they are totally different kids, but I will always remember Leaf talking about how he was gonna go right to vegas.

Dumbassery at its peak.

Molitoth 12-02-2011 12:26 PM

Quote:

Do you have a link to that interview?
It was on either Sportscenter or NFLN on Wednesday.
I don't remember what segment, sorry. =(


EDIT: Found it.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=7301484

Just not a good interview by the kid imo,... he just seems really immature. Inner gut feeling has me thinking he will bust.

suds79 12-02-2011 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 8161368)
At least he's honest?

RGIII it is.

I saw Sam Mellinger say in the chat the other day when asked about which one he thinks the Chiefs would pick.

While he admitted he doesn't know, he guessed it would be Griffin. He thinks Matt Barkley is the type of QB you can find in the first round of the draft nearly every year where as RG3 brings something different. Something special.

Granted that's his opinion but when I think about it? I think he's right.

TimeForWasp 12-02-2011 12:30 PM

I once told someone they orton do what they are doing. I hope that is not a sign.

BossChief 12-02-2011 12:52 PM

TBH, I'm really cooling off on RG3 if we are picking in the top 10.

I seriously question his ability to sustain a long and productive career as a quarterback in this league.

His skill set and playing style is fairly similar to Randall Cunninghams and RC only started 135 games out of the 256 games played during his career.

He also may well be a guy that has to have an offense tailor fit to his skill set to maximize his potential and then you have a situation where we need to pigeon hole ourselves into that system and would have to have a similar type quarterback s the backup that could continue to lead that offense if/when RG3 goes down.

Dont get me wrong, he would give us one hell of an exciting player to watch and he would be able to put points on the board and butts in the seats, but one has to wonder if when all is said and done, if he would be worth all that would come with him.

ChiefsCountry 12-02-2011 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 8161392)
It was on either Sportscenter or NFLN on Wednesday.
I don't remember what segment, sorry. =(


EDIT: Found it.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=7301484

Just not a good interview by the kid imo,... he just seems really immature. Inner gut feeling has me thinking he will bust.

And here it comes the annual knocking every QB prospect for everything when it really doesn't mean nothing. He is going to bust just because he said he wants to be financially sure. Geez the stupidty on here.

Here is the written article from that interview:
http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/ncf/s...-paperwork-nfl

Quote:

"I think finishing out on a good note here at USC was something I wanted to do, and now that we've done that, there's a chance for my future to be financially secure, to move on. There's a couple reasons but it almost seems like the reasons to stay might outweigh those [to leave] with all the guys coming back. Both sides, I look at it and it almost seems to good to be true," Barkley said.

Earlier this month, Barkley said his father, Les, would handle much of the behind-the-scenes work on his decision of whether to declare for the draft, including meeting with potential agents and looking into ways to protect the long-term investment if he does return.

"As of now, I'm still 50-50. I haven't decided. I haven't even begun that process of looking at either side. I'm still enjoying this season, enjoying last week's win against UCLA. Starting next week, I'll really dive into that. I still have some school left and some finals. So once those get out of the way and I can focus on the decision, that's where my attention will be," Barkley said.

BossChief 12-02-2011 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 8161483)
And here it comes the annual knocking every QB prospect for everything when it really doesn't mean nothing. He is going to bust just because he said he wants to be financially sure. Geez the stupidty on here.

Its all part of the process for me.

I try to weigh things and then judge by those factors what I would do in the teams situation.

Like it or not, bringing up the money as the reason for going pro is a strike against him.

Of course that's what he is thinking, but its not the answer he should give.

JMO

Molitoth 12-02-2011 01:04 PM

Quote:

He is going to bust just because he said he wants to be financially sure. Geez the stupidty on here.
I don't think wanting to be financially secure is the reason he will bust. I just have a gut feeling he will. Just like other people have gut feelings other players will bust. None of us know, we are just guessing. I'm not "stupid" because of it, but I suppose we can revisit this thread in a few years and see if I am right.

And I don't care what you think, Matt Barkley botched that interview in my book. His answers were not well thought out or spoken. He lack the maturity that a lot of players DO have. These high profile players are taught to say and do the right things if they want to represent the NFL. If you think he's going to come in and lead a Chiefs team to the playoffs, then good for you... but I don't.

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-02-2011 01:08 PM

Here we go again...again.

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 01:10 PM

Next BossChief is going to tell us how he's cooled off on Andrew Luck too because he's been a little bumpy lately.

RealSNR 12-02-2011 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161472)
TBH, I'm really cooling off on RG3 if we are picking in the top 10.

I seriously question his ability to sustain a long and productive career as a quarterback in this league.

His skill set and playing style is fairly similar to Randall Cunninghams and RC only started 135 games out of the 256 games played during his career.

He also may well be a guy that has to have an offense tailor fit to his skill set to maximize his potential and then you have a situation where we need to pigeon hole ourselves into that system and would have to have a similar type quarterback s the backup that could continue to lead that offense if/when RG3 goes down.

Dont get me wrong, he would give us one hell of an exciting player to watch and he would be able to put points on the board and butts in the seats, but one has to wonder if when all is said and done, if he would be worth all that would come with him.

I disagree. RGIII's arm/throwing motion isn't the thing that needs correcting. It's his knowledge of operating a pro offense.

That's something that he will have no problems picking up, as smart as he is. The footwork, the understanding of the pocket, everything. He's already taking snaps under center. He's already used to understanding coverages. I think it will take some time, sure, but there's absolutely no reason why an NFL offense should have to go Tyler Thigpen/Tim Tebow for him.

BigCatDaddy 12-02-2011 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 8161504)
I don't think wanting to be financially secure is the reason he will bust. I just have a gut feeling he will. Just like other people have gut feelings other players will bust. None of us know, we are just guessing. I'm not "stupid" because of it, but I suppose we can revisit this thread in a few years and see if I am right.

And I don't care what you think, Matt Barkley botched that interview in my book. His answers were not well thought out or spoken. He lack the maturity that a lot of players DO have. These high profile players are taught to say and do the right things if they want to represent the NFL. If you think he's going to come in and lead a Chiefs team to the playoffs, then good for you... but I don't.

:facepalm:

Did you happen to catch Cam Newton on Gruden's show last year? It was a Bill Walton HORRIBAL and yet he is kicking ass and taking names as a rook.

Chiefnj2 12-02-2011 01:11 PM

Barkley seems like your typical USC QB. A kid that was highly recruited throughout high school. A kid who has had the best training money can buy since high school. He's spent his summers throwing with Palmer and Leinart and other pros. He should be polished and be a head above other college QB's with all of the training he's received.

USC still has a ton of talent and plays a relatively easy schedule. I don't see anything from him that distinguishes him from Sanchez or Leinart as college players.

I think Mellinger is right that there isn't anything really special about him.

In a way he reminds me a bit of Clausen.

BossChief 12-02-2011 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 8161504)
I don't think wanting to be financially secure is the reason he will bust. I just have a gut feeling he will. Just like other people have gut feelings other players will bust. None of us know, we are just guessing. I'm not "stupid" because of it, but I suppose we can revisit this thread in a few years and see if I am right.

And I don't care what you think, Matt Barkley botched that interview in my book. His answers were not well thought out or spoken. He lack the maturity that a lot of players DO have. These high profile players are taught to say and do the right things if they want to represent the NFL. If you think he's going to come in and lead a Chiefs team to the playoffs, then good for you... but I don't.

While you pointed out a valid strike against Barkley, it doens't mean that he couldn't come in and lead this team to the playoffs...shit, maybe even do so in his first year.

By saying that, you are neglecting the serious amount of talent this team has on offense, especially the talent we will have next year after returning JC and Moeaki as well as a new crop of drafted players and free agents.

Chief_For_Life58 12-02-2011 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8161397)
I saw Sam Mellinger say in the chat the other day when asked about which one he thinks the Chiefs would pick.

While he admitted he doesn't know, he guessed it would be Griffin. He thinks Matt Barkley is the type of QB you can find in the first round of the draft nearly every year where as RG3 brings something different. Something special.

Granted that's his opinion but when I think about it? I think he's right.

I hope that youre right that hes right

KC_Lee 12-02-2011 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161472)
His skill set and playing style is fairly similar to Randall Cunninghams and RC only started 135 games out of the 256 games played during his career.

While that is fair comparison, the eras which Cunningham played was much different than now; mobile QBs are more the norm now than then.

Also, Buddy Ryan only asked the Cunningham give him 5 “big” plays a game and the defense would win the game during his tenure in Philly.

lcarus 12-02-2011 01:14 PM

I have no idea why, but I just cannot see Pioli drafting RGIII. Just can't see it.

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8161527)
Barkley seems like your typical USC QB. I kid that was highly recruited throughout high school. A kid who has had the best training money can buy since high school. He's spent his summers throwing with Palmer and Leinart and other pros. He should be polished and be a head above other college QB's with all of the training he's received.

USC still has a ton of talent and plays a relatively easy schedule. I don't see anything from him that distinguishes him from Sanchez or Leinart as college players.

I think Mellinger is right that there isn't anything really special about him.

In a way he reminds me a bit of Clausen.

Please stop it with the he's from USC bullshit.

Micjones 12-02-2011 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 8161344)
I saw Barkley in an interview the other day and after the question was asked why you are ready for the NFL he answered with something along the lines of "I want to be financially secure". And while I understand everyone wants to be rich, I'd like to see my future QB talk about his love for the game, and not about money.

If I'm going to risk my life and my ability to lift a spoon on my own...
Yeah, I think I'd want to be financially secure in return.

Hell, if he'd never played a down of football in his life he'd be in college seeking the same kind of security.

This moral framework people try to force onto sports (which at their core are anything but) is always strange to me.

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 01:16 PM

has there ever been a college QB good enough for chiefs fans?

Molitoth 12-02-2011 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 8161526)
:facepalm:

Did you happen to catch Cam Newton on Gruden's show last year? It was a Bill Walton HORRIBAL and yet he is kicking ass and taking names as a rook.

Most people that I saw were labeling Newton as an overhyped bust waiting to happen. They were wrong,(as of now)... and I may be about Barkley... and I accept that.
Although, we saw what a couple of these other QB's have done in their second years. We will see what Cam does in his sophmore/junior season.

Chiefnj2 12-02-2011 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8161545)
Please stop it with the he's from USC bullshit.

Why? The School does a great job recruiting 5 star recruits and coaching them up so they get drafted in the NFL. They churn out NFL QBs.

BigCatDaddy 12-02-2011 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8161545)
Please stop it with the he's from USC bullshit.

But Orakpo was a typical Texas OLB!

Chiefnj2 12-02-2011 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161549)
has there ever been a college QB good enough for chiefs fans?

So, you are okay if KC takes Foles in the first?

Chief_For_Life58 12-02-2011 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8161546)
If I'm going to risk my life and my ability to lift a spoon on my own...
Yeah, I think I'd want to be financially secure in return.

Hell, if he'd never played a down of football in his life he'd be in college seeking the same kind of security.

This moral framework people try to force onto sports (which at their core are anything but) is always strange to me.

good point. very true

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8161556)
So, you are okay if KC takes Foles in the first?

no idea what that has to do with my post, but sure...

Chiefnj2 12-02-2011 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161559)
no idea what that has to do with my post, but sure...

Fine. You are in the camp of take any QB. You don't care who it is. Don't talk about the negatives of any of them.

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8161563)
Fine. You are in the camp of take any QB. You don't care who it is. Don't talk about the negatives of any of them.

nah, I'm in the 'not-spending-30-years-making-up-excuses-to-not-draft-a-qb" camp....

BossChief 12-02-2011 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8161524)
Next BossChief is going to tell us how he's cooled off on Andrew Luck too because he's been a little bumpy lately.

Not a chance.

Let me put it this way....

If we are sitting at 2nd overall, I would STILL trade a boatload to trade up with Indy to draft Luck.

IMO Luck gives you the best of both worlds and is clearly the best prospect in this class and its not a 1a and 1b situation that some are making it out to be.
Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8161525)
I disagree. RGIII's arm/throwing motion isn't the thing that needs correcting. It's his knowledge of operating a pro offense.

That's something that he will have no problems picking up, as smart as he is. The footwork, the understanding of the pocket, everything. He's already taking snaps under center. He's already used to understanding coverages. I think it will take some time, sure, but there's absolutely no reason why an NFL offense should have to go Tyler Thigpen/Tim Tebow for him.

Im not saying that at all and I agree that his learning curve will likely be smaller than some might think... but if we are gonna maximize his immense potential, we need to run an offense that utilizes aall of his strengths and Im not sure his frame could handle the amount of abuse it would endue year in and year out.

Keep inmind, this is coming form a guy that would do almost anything to draft a real franchise quarterback....Im just not gonna cover my eyes and plug my ears and think that he would be coming in with a lot of experience in running an offense that resembles what he would be asked to do in the NFL if we are to have a chance at winning a championship with him.

BigCatDaddy 12-02-2011 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161566)
nah, I'm in the 'not-spending-30-years-making-up-excuses-to-not-draft-a-qb" camp....

Exactly, you can find some type of fault in any QB.

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8161552)
Why? The School does a great job recruiting 5 star recruits and coaching them up so they get drafted in the NFL. They churn out NFL QBs.

Lane Kiffin is a great coach?

suds79 12-02-2011 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161472)
I seriously question his ability to sustain a long and productive career as a quarterback in this league.

His skill set and playing style is fairly similar to Randall Cunninghams and RC only started 135 games out of the 256 games played during his career.

I think this is a legitimate concern if RG3 was just another Michael Vick running QB who takes hits.

Those type of guys almost always get hurt.

But I've seen enough of his games this year where I see him playing smart and sliding most of the time. This is huge and why I think he's different.

Chiefnj2 12-02-2011 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 8161577)
Exactly, you can find some type of fault in any QB.

So you can't talk about things you perceive as faults?

BigCatDaddy 12-02-2011 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8161594)
So you can't talk about things you perceive as faults?

Sure, you just shouldn't exaggerate them to the joint of making an excuse to pass on a quality QB to take a RT.

Chiefnj2 12-02-2011 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 8161597)
Sure, you just shouldn't exaggerate them to the joint of making an excuse to pass on a quality QB to take a RT.

Who said that?

BossChief 12-02-2011 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 8161577)
Exactly, you can find some type of fault in any QB.

true, but you also have to acknowledge that a lot of the concerns with the big name quarterbacks seem to be legit concerns for them as NFL quarterbacks, as well.
Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8161582)
I think this is a legitimate concern if RG3 was just another Michael Vick running QB who takes hits.

Those type of guys almost always get hurt.

But I've seen enough of his games this year where I see him playing smart and sliding most of the time. This is huge and why I think he's different.

You have a valid point there, as I have mentioned it a few times as well. The kid is very smart and seems to know how to protect himself...but the NFL is quite different than college. Players are bigger and faster across the board and if he is gonna be used to pick up yardage with his legs a couple times a game, he is gonna get hit and that is a concern as to his long term future.

Ill say it again, he is built similarly to Randall and plays similarly to him, as well. Randall missed almost half the games as a pro.

Would I be excited if we drafted him?

ABSOLUTELY

Would I be surprised if some of the concerns I have with him show their face during his career in the NFL?

Not at all.

BigCatDaddy 12-02-2011 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8161601)
Who said that?

You and Molitoth.

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 01:33 PM

we can't draft Barkley because...wait for it...he's from USC


really deep analysis of his faults here...plus, he admitted in an interview that he expects to be paid for playing professional football....STRIKE TWO MR. BARKLEY, I SEE RIGHT THROUGH YOU


and we can't draft RGIII because black QBs get injured in the nfl...wait, I meant to say because option QBs get injured...wait, he doesn't run an option offense, I meant to say because black QBs get injured in the NFL...plus no good pro QBs have ever come out of Baylor, so none ever will; just like the fact that some USC QBs failed means that all will in the future..

BossChief 12-02-2011 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8161601)
Who said that?

nobody here would defend a move like that.

Im one of the biggest Iowa fans on here and I would want to burn Arrowhead to the ground if we pass on any of the top 4 or 5 quarterbacks for Riley Reiff.

BossChief 12-02-2011 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 8161611)
You and Boss Chief.

Show me where the **** I said that, moron.

BigCatDaddy 12-02-2011 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161616)
Show me where the **** I said that, moron.

Wrong guy in the thread. My bad.

Chiefnj2 12-02-2011 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 8161611)
You and Molitoth.

Show me where I said I'd pass on Barkley for a tackle.

BossChief 12-02-2011 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161613)
we can't draft Barkley because...wait for it...he's from USC


really deep analysis of his faults here...plus, he admitted in an interview that he expects to be paid for playing professional football....STRIKE TWO MR. BARKLEY, I SEE RIGHT THROUGH YOU


and we can't draft RGIII because black QBs get injured in the nfl...wait, I meant to say because option QBs get injured...wait, he doesn't run an option offense, I meant to say because black QBs get injured in the NFL...plus no good pro QBs have ever come out of Baylor, so none ever will; just like the fact that some USC QBs failed means that all will in the future..

Everyone here wants us to draft a quarterback.

Nothing wrong wiith talking about each of their faults.

As far as Barkley goes, he has his faults, too.

1) his arm is good, but nothing special.

2) he had a tendency to be a Jekyll or Hyde type player. Great one half of the game and poor the other half.

3) He forces throws. Even though he cut back on this as a senior, the way he did it in his other years makes it a legit thing to watch for.

4) he plays in California and hasnt really had to deal with much bad weather....bad weather he would be facing every year as a Chiefs quarterback.

Do any of those make me turn my head and look elsewhere if he is there when we pick? **** NO.....would I be surprised if any or all of these are serious concerns for him as a pro? Not a bit.

...

There is NOTHING wrong with talking about a players deficiencies and getting everything out in the open to try and come to a consensus, of sorts, on who we think would be the best fit for us.

BossChief 12-02-2011 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8161622)
Show me where I said I'd pass on Barkley for a tackle.

If ANYBODY here ever says that, they deserve to be tar and feathered and then sent into a burning aids forest to suffer.

BigCatDaddy 12-02-2011 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8161622)
Show me where I said I'd pass on Barkley for a tackle.

When you say he reminds you of Clausen that seems to indicate you don't feel he is worth a 1st round pick and would thus require a player of another position be taken or another QB. It seemed as if you were on the No QB bandwagon to me. If you are on the RG3 bandwagon then my bad. Either way a QB HAS to be taken in the 1st round this year. If they aren't there trade up.

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 01:50 PM

AlbertBreer Albert Breer
Just talked with an exec who thinks Boise's Kellen Moore is a better prospect than Baylor's Robert Griffin. Kinda interesting.
30 Nov Favorite Retweet Reply

ROFL Watch it be Pioli

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161646)
Everyone here wants us to draft a quarterback.

Nothing wrong wiith talking about each of their faults.

As far as Barkley goes, he has his faults, too.

1) his arm is good, but nothing special.

2) he had a tendency to be a Jekyll or Hyde type player. Great one half of the game and poor the other half.

3) He forces throws. Even though he cut back on this as a senior, the way he did it in his other years makes it a legit thing to watch for.

4) he plays in California and hasnt really had to deal with much bad weather....bad weather he would be facing every year as a Chiefs quarterback.

Do any of those make me turn my head and look elsewhere if he is there when we pick? **** NO.....would I be surprised if any or all of these are serious concerns for him as a pro? Not a bit.

...

There is NOTHING wrong with talking about a players deficiencies and getting everything out in the open to try and come to a consensus, of sorts, on who we think would be the best fit for us.


he plays in California....that is awesome...i've heard it all now

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 01:56 PM

Luck has thrown a pick once every 44 attempts Barkley once every 63 attempts. Not saying Barkley is better but since we won't have a chance at Luck he seems like the "safe" QB pick. Worth considering since Pioli always drafts the "safe" pick besides the 2 **** ups in RD 2 of 2010.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.