ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs If Romeo is HC, who are the OC candidates? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253902)

Dante84 12-18-2011 03:34 PM

If Romeo is HC, who are the OC candidates?
 
Because Muir can't stay.

Outside of MCD, who are some options?

Hydrae 12-18-2011 03:35 PM

Mike Sherman

Okie_Apparition 12-18-2011 03:37 PM

MIke McCoy/Gailey fluffers

Fat Elvis 12-18-2011 03:37 PM

Jim Zorn

Titty Meat 12-18-2011 03:38 PM

Paul Hackett

Dante84 12-18-2011 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hydrae (Post 8215697)
Mike Sherman

Interesting :hmmm:

Huffman83 12-18-2011 03:39 PM

I'd be cool w/ Zorn.

Bowser 12-18-2011 03:40 PM

Norv, if he gets the axe as expected.

Dante84 12-18-2011 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8215762)
Norv, if he gets the axe as expected.

That would also be neat.

KCBOSS1 12-18-2011 03:44 PM

I thought whoever called the game today did a great job, except inside the 5. The Pack was off balance all day. It's only one game, but maybe Crennel did some very good redirecting.... Who knows. It should have been 21-0 in the first half.

Buck 12-18-2011 03:45 PM

You can have Norv.

84 Chief 12-18-2011 03:46 PM

Todd Hailey

Bowser 12-18-2011 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 8215813)
You can have Norv.

As coordinator? Sign us up!

Buck 12-18-2011 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8215820)
As coordinator? Sign us up!

Have him in any ****ing capacity you want, I really don't care. As long as he's not in San Diego anymore.

Baby Lee 12-18-2011 03:47 PM

Loved, loved, LOVED Crennel's chuckle at the Hali holding question.

ROFL ROFL

Bowser 12-18-2011 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 8215825)
Have him in any ****ing capacity you want, I really don't care. As long as he's not in San Diego anymore.

LOL, ready for a change out there? I think you guys will be much improved the minute AJ Smith gets his pink slip, not just Norv.

Easy 6 12-18-2011 03:49 PM

I could live with Zorn or Turner.

JCharles1981 12-18-2011 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8215731)
Paul Hackett

Really? He was crap with the Chiefs offense. He tried bringing the late 80's San Francisco 49er offensive strategy to the Chiefs, and they were unable to adjust. I don't want to see him back in Kansas City having anything to do with the Chiefs.

Dante84 12-18-2011 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCharles1981 (Post 8216017)
Really? He was crap with the Chiefs offense. He tried bringing the late 80's San Francisco 49er offensive strategy to the Chiefs, and they were unable to adjust. I don't want to see him back in Kansas City having anything to do with the Chiefs.

sarcasm, pal.

O.city 12-18-2011 04:20 PM

Mike Gundy?

kstater 12-18-2011 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 8215832)
Loved, loved, LOVED Crennel's chuckle at the Hali holding question.
ROFL ROFL

Explain please

xztop12 12-18-2011 05:01 PM

Who was calling the offensive plays?

ChiefMojo 12-18-2011 05:06 PM

Muir is fine as the OL coach but not sure I want him as OC next season. Would much rather see Zorn as the OC. Then again it might be in our best interest to have Zorn on the sideline with the QB's?

We will know more after the next two games. If we perform very well with Orton in those games, then maybe Muir saves his old a** skin?

Deberg_1990 12-18-2011 05:11 PM

Bill Muir
Posted via Mobile Device

Baby Lee 12-18-2011 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8216275)
Explain please

Someone finally asked at the postgame PC about his thought on whether Hali being held a lot out there and not getting calls, and Crennel just gave an extended sarcastic chuckle.

Then said something like 'trust what you see.'

Gonzo 12-18-2011 05:14 PM

Zorn. I have little doubt. I don't thing McDoucher comes here.
Posted via Mobile Device

SPATCH 12-18-2011 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCharles1981 (Post 8216017)
Really? He was crap with the Chiefs offense. He tried bringing the late 80's San Francisco 49er offensive strategy to the Chiefs, and they were unable to adjust. I don't want to see him back in Kansas City having anything to do with the Chiefs.

sup n00b?

Rooster 12-18-2011 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 8216519)
sup n00b?

LMAOLMAO

RustShack 12-18-2011 11:09 PM

I could see Crennel NOT wanting McDaniels simply for the fact that he will want to constantly air it out, not rush, and hurt the defense. I'd be cool with Zorn staying.

ChiefsCountry 12-18-2011 11:22 PM

I would like to see Sprano brought in as OL coach though.

CaliforniaChief 12-18-2011 11:22 PM

Jim Zorn.

ChiefsCountry 12-18-2011 11:33 PM

Outside of Muir, who should just retire, we have a pretty good coaching staff at all positions for the most part. Get an offensive coordinator and o-line coach and we could be cooking.

BigChiefFan 12-19-2011 12:17 AM

The Packers QB coach, Tom Clements would be a good consideration, IMO. He already has experience in KC and has done a damn good job at getting the most out of QBs. He should definitely be on the short list of candidates.

Bambi 12-19-2011 12:23 AM

Zorn's got that look that is just a bit too big time to be a "qb coach". I say bring him up.

Dante84 12-19-2011 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 8218309)
The Packers QB coach, Tom Clements would be a good consideration, IMO. He already has experience in KC and has done a damn good job at getting the most out of QBs. He should definitely be on the short list of candidates.

Rumor is he wants the Penn State job, bad.

johnny961 12-19-2011 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 8218228)
Jim Zorn.

I was kinda wondering if Zorn would be considered myself.

TimeForWasp 12-19-2011 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnny961 (Post 8218371)
I was kinda wondering if Zorn would be considered myself.


I have a feeling he was brought here with that in mind.

FloridaMan88 12-19-2011 02:14 AM

Norv Turner if San Diego fires him.

BossChief 12-19-2011 03:15 AM

haha

Charlie Weis

Seriously though, Tom Clements would be a fantastic hire.

Been saying that for 3 years now.

johnny961 12-19-2011 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsNow (Post 8218384)
I have a feeling he was brought here with that in mind.

I personally would rather see Zorn get promoted than see us get McDaniels.

BossChief 12-19-2011 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnny961 (Post 8218429)
I personally would rather see Zorn get promoted than see us get McDaniels.

me too.

Promoting Zorn and bringing Nick Sirianni up as the QB coach would be a good direction, IMO.

I'm not in love with him as a play caller, though. He was terrible in that role in Washington, but to his credit they really didnt have any talent to call effective plays with so he may be better in that role with us.

beach tribe 12-19-2011 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huffman83 (Post 8215756)
I'd be cool w/ Zorn.

ding

spanky 52 12-19-2011 05:58 AM

I'd be okay with Zorn. Brings a sense of continuity and I don't see Pioli/Hunt wanting to take too many chances now on new hires. One coach that really needs to go is Hoffman, the ST's coach.

TimeForWasp 12-19-2011 07:01 AM

I still like Marc Trestman though. Maybe for some position, QB coach or maybe OC.

ShowtimeSBMVP 12-19-2011 08:51 AM

Go slow with Romeo






It's probably not possible to overstate how much the Chiefs helped Romeo Crennel's cause by beating Green Bay yesterday. The Chiefs looked every bit the team they should have looked like all season. The way they played speaks for itself, and for Crennel's bid to become the permanent head coach. The players clearly responded to their new leader in ways that surprised everyone, perhaps even chairman Clark Hunt and general manager Scott Pioli.

But there were other things that maybe you missed that support removing the interim tag from Crennel's title. Offensive play calls were so efficient the Chiefs were getting to the line of scrimmage with 15 seconds left on the play clock. Substitutions on both sides of the ball were timely and smooth. Those are functions of the head coach, or perhaps in this case the head coach getting out of the way.

There was so much to like in there it's natural why the Chiefs don't just go ahead and hire Crennel on a permanent basis right now. That's not going to happen for at least a couple of reasons.

First, it shouldn't happen now. The Chiefs won't, and shouldn't make a decision based on one game, however good or bad. When Hunt and Pioli fired Todd Haley, they cited the Chiefs up and down play as a big reason. If the Chiefs return to the tank in next week's game against the Raiders, how would Crennel as the permanent hire look then? The Chiefs instead need to see similar things from Crennel and the players in the final two games for true validation of Crennel's impact.

Second it's not Pioli's way to make such a quick move. He's got to get this decision right. Moves made at an emotional time like this usually don't work out. He'll want to talk to a few candidates, a good move even if only to validate the eventual hiring of Crennel.

So this is going to take some. Almost certainly the Chiefs won't make a move until the season is over. It may no immediately happen after that.

But sometime in January the Chiefs will have their new guy. And if the Chiefs continue to play as they did Sunday, then and only then should it be Crennel

Lzen 12-19-2011 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 8218726)
Go slow with Romeo






It's probably not possible to overstate how much the Chiefs helped Romeo Crennel's cause by beating Green Bay yesterday. The Chiefs looked every bit the team they should have looked like all season. The way they played speaks for itself, and for Crennel's bid to become the permanent head coach. The players clearly responded to their new leader in ways that surprised everyone, perhaps even chairman Clark Hunt and general manager Scott Pioli.

But there were other things that maybe you missed that support removing the interim tag from Crennel's title. Offensive play calls were so efficient the Chiefs were getting to the line of scrimmage with 15 seconds left on the play clock. Substitutions on both sides of the ball were timely and smooth. Those are functions of the head coach, or perhaps in this case the head coach getting out of the way.

There was so much to like in there it's natural why the Chiefs don't just go ahead and hire Crennel on a permanent basis right now. That's not going to happen for at least a couple of reasons.

First, it shouldn't happen now. The Chiefs won't, and shouldn't make a decision based on one game, however good or bad. When Hunt and Pioli fired Todd Haley, they cited the Chiefs up and down play as a big reason. If the Chiefs return to the tank in next week's game against the Raiders, how would Crennel as the permanent hire look then? The Chiefs instead need to see similar things from Crennel and the players in the final two games for true validation of Crennel's impact.

Second it's not Pioli's way to make such a quick move. He's got to get this decision right. Moves made at an emotional time like this usually don't work out. He'll want to talk to a few candidates, a good move even if only to validate the eventual hiring of Crennel.

So this is going to take some. Almost certainly the Chiefs won't make a move until the season is over. It may no immediately happen after that.

But sometime in January the Chiefs will have their new guy. And if the Chiefs continue to play as they did Sunday, then and only then should it be Crennel

True.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.