![]() |
The Number of FA Corners Just Got Bigger
He's no Brandon Carr, but maybe this will dilute the market a tiny bit:
Raiders release Stanford Routt Well, here’s the first big surprising move of the offseason. Oakland released cornerback Stanford Routt on Thursday, less than a year after the team gave him a “five-year, $54.5 million” contract. (It was originally a three-year, $31.5 million deal, then the team restructured the deal.) It’s a surprising move because it was reported last year that Routt’s $5 million 2012 base salary was guaranteed. It’s possible it was only guaranteed if Routt was on the roster past a certain date. (Once again, even “guaranteed” money isn’t always guaranteed.) Routt started last season well and enjoyed a fine 2010 season, but he struggled badly down the stretch. He got picked on often despite having the tag as Oakland’s top cornerback. As a 28-year-old with a lot of starting experience, Routt figures to attract plenty of free agent interest. For Routt, free agency starts Friday. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...tanford-routt/ UPDATE Raiders avoided $5 million guaranteed by cutting Routt now So why did the Raiders dump cornerback Stanford Routt today? Per a source with knowledge of his contract, Routt’s $5 million base salary for 2012 would have become fully guaranteed if he had been on the roster five days after the start of the 2012 waiver period. Though Routt loses the $5 million, he gets more than a fair crack at free agency, hitting the market more than a month before the official launch of the spending spree. Thus, either way, tying guaranteed payments to presence on the roster early in the waiver period provides maximum protection. Either the team keeps the player and incurs the full guarantee (as the Jets did with receiver Santonio Holmes) or the team cuts the cord and the player walks away free and clear. In Routt’s case, he carries with him $10 million paid out in 2011, the first — and ultimately only — year of his contract. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ing-routt-now/ |
Let Carr walk, sign him up!! lol
|
If Carr hits the market, he will still get top dollar. Routt would be like a consolation prize at best.
|
So did my girlfriend's ass. What a coincidence.
|
Carr is gonna get paid. I hope he stays here, but it's not "the Patriot Way" to resign a CB for top dollar. If I had to choose, I think I'd go with Bowe, he is a true #1 WR and has done a lot with shit QB's. Carr is gonna get an $80 mil contract, not sure if I'm comfortable giving him that.
|
Quote:
|
If Carr walks, you almost have to bring Routt in on an incentive based contract due to the last part of this year. I wouldn't be too opposed to it, as Routt will be probably be cheaper and excels at being a #2 corner.
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
I am willing to bet the Finnegan leaves the Titans (either landing with the Lions or Rams) and Routt would be the type of player the Titans would sign.
|
Quote:
He hasn't noticed Cassel sucks. |
I didn't pay much attention cause I only seen him playing special teams. Was that rookie CB Brown any good?
It'll be a shame if Carr leaves. I don't think he's missed any time with injury since day 1? It's gotta be tough on Flowers not knowing. His best friend/team mate who he's started with from day 1 as rookies may depart, gotta suck. |
Quote:
true...selective eyesight |
Sign Carr, sign Routt
|
Quote:
Seriously, alot of you guys throw around The Patriot Way as if you really understand it when you don't. You're right that the Patriots will definitely let players walk if they think they're too much money (Asante Samuel, Ty Law, Deion Branch, Richard Seymour), but there are plenty of examples of players who DID get top dollar because the Patriots determined that they WERE worth the money Richard Seymour (2005 or whenever it was -- the first contract he got) Randy Moss Vince Wilfork Logan Mankins |
Quote:
The entire loss was because of the cornerbacks? That's what you're saying? That's absurd. The Patriots lost because they got outplayed in the fourth quarter by the Giants across the board. If the Patriots, with the lead, could've done somethign on offense, then they could've won. If they could've gotten a key stop on defense, they could've won. No idea how this all falls on the corners. Makes no sense. I do agree that the Patriots are seriously short of "difference-makers" on defense, which certainly COULD be a corner. |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
"Though Routt loses the $5 million, he gets more than a fair crack at free agency, hitting the market more than a month before the official launch of the spending spree."
- Nice move by the Raiders. |
Quote:
I don't pretend to have inside knowledge, but I certainly understand the general structure and the concept. Why? Because I've paid very close attention to it for 10+ years, including reading multiple books covering the Patriots as well as much as I can find in newspapers and periodicals. But look at the statement I'm refuting. It's clearly and provably wrong, so I did prove it wrong. The Patriot Way is misunderstood by most on here because they either hate the Patriots, Pioli, or being "Patriots lite" or because they're not willing to take the time to figure out how it works, to whatever degree we simple fans can. Also note that the Patriots Way is not necessarily the Chiefs Way or the Falcons Way. BB would never have traded up for Julio Jones the way Dimitroff did in Atlanta, for example. Each GM is going to do what they think best, not mindlessly ask "what would Belichick do". |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Cheating in any form is a douche move. Its fine, they still keep their titles, but you cant honestly expect people to have respect or say good things for a team that does some underhanded shit. The Patriot Way has involved Spygate and thats enough in itself to have nothing but contempt for Belicheat and the way he does things. |
Wait, are we not planning on signing Carr? Aren't we like five billions dollars under the cap?
|
Quote:
What's to say? Haters gonna hate. |
And Cheaters gonna cheat
|
Quote:
It's such a joke, but whatever. I'm not going to change any perceptions. Have fun with it. |
Quote:
|
Rotoworld says the Chiefs have shown interest in Routt already...
|
Quote:
Like I said, haters gonna hate. Have fun wallowing in your bitterness and hatred. No skin off my nose. |
The agent for Stanford Routt, who was released by the Oakland Raiders on Thursday, is out in the media making it known that his client has suitors. He told ESPN's Josina Anderson that Routt has visits set up with the Buffalo Bills and Tennessee Titans.
While no other visits are scheduled, the agent told another ESPNer, Calvin Watkins, that the Minnesota Vikings, Dallas Cowboys and Kansas City Chiefs have all "reached out" about Routt's services. Who knows what kind of interest they have, whether it's serious or just a phone call. (By the way, I wonder how the Chiefs feel about the agent throwing their name out there publicly? That's usually not KC's style.) I'm not sure what level of interest the Chiefs have in Routt but I can understand why they might want to keep tabs on him. The Chiefs have a free-agent-to-be in CB Brandon Carr, and they need to be prepared if, for some reason, he doesn't return to KC. I'm not saying that'll happen and I'm definitely not saying that should happen. I'm just saying KC should be prepared for that just in case. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
probably just keeping tabs on market values |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.