ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Does anything less than a playoff appearance = Bye Bye Pioli? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=261435)

Titty Meat 07-15-2012 12:44 PM

Does anything less than a playoff appearance = Bye Bye Pioli?
 
This isn't a thread bashing Pioli it's simply to encourage discussion.

The Facts:

The Chiefs have finished in last place 2 out of the 3 seasons since Pioli took over.

The Chiefs have averaged 7 wins under the Pioli regime.

The 2009 draft= Fail

The Trade for Matt Cassel turns out it wasn't good.

Already fired one coach missing the playoffs this year with this squad would mean Crennel isn't that good of a coach.

So does anything less than a playoff appearance= failure? If so that would be 3 out of 4 years Pioli has failed. That gets you walking papers with most franchises.

kstater 07-15-2012 12:45 PM

Peyton Manning

SAUTO 07-15-2012 12:46 PM

Bump
Posted via Mobile Device

stonedstooge 07-15-2012 12:47 PM

If Clark's sole goal is to make money, Pioli is his man and he will stay.

ThatRaceCardGuy 07-15-2012 12:47 PM

Somebody PM me PM`s address....BUMP!

ThatRaceCardGuy 07-15-2012 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedstooge (Post 8742430)
If Clark's sole goal is to make money, Pioli is his man and he will stay.

I think the little ****er has a huge ego, which works great for Chiefs fans. When he took over he went out and signed the (perceived) best GM out there. He spent money on what was thought to be a really good QB (**** you clarK!) and has re-signed all of our key players except for Carr. I think the guy wants to win a SB as much as we want this team to win one

Titty Meat 07-15-2012 12:56 PM

I see the Pioli defenders don't want to take on this subject of what very well could happen given Peyton Manning in the division.

ThatRaceCardGuy 07-15-2012 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8742449)
I see the Pioli defenders don't want to take on this subject of what very well could happen given Peyton Manning in the division.

Piloli is an average GM pre Cassell. ..that being said, his love affair with Cassell is setting this franchise back another 5-10 years and the ****er should burn at the stake because of it.

The Franchise 07-15-2012 01:01 PM

Should it? Yes.
Will it? No.

Ceej 07-15-2012 01:04 PM

Beermenoonanbieberfever.

notorious 07-15-2012 01:07 PM

I think that he stays for at least 5 more years. He has done a good job building a team except for one position.



Too bad it's the most important position.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-15-2012 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 8742469)
I think that he stays for at least 5 more years. He has done a good job building a team except for one position.



Too bad it's the most important position.

I think Clark will give him another opportunity with a different QB then go from there. After that happens, then Clark can make a better decision IMO.

BossChief 07-15-2012 01:09 PM

It depends on the circumstance.

I'll say that if Cassel hasn't vastly improved by midseason (by game 6, we should know because it's a tough opening stretch) and he is still starting even though we are losing....a change should be seriously debated.

LiveSteam 07-15-2012 01:10 PM

How about pointing the finger at the HUNT'S? Are they to not responsible for the 40 years of suck that has been KC football?

O.city 07-15-2012 01:11 PM

I know some people say this, but what exactly should the Hunts do differently?

Canofbier 07-15-2012 01:13 PM

We were technically last place last year, but it's not nearly the same magnitude of "last place" as the first time. We were as close as making one of two blocked field goals in that horrible game against the Raiders to winning the division for a second consecutive year.

Our team may not be a perennial contender yet, but you can see the progress. Our team was pretty awful when he came aboard, and talent and depth at every position has improved since he arrived (even at QB, arguably). He demonstrated this offseason that he's able to land top-flight free agents (Winston).

Obviously, he's made some mistakes (Cassel's massive contract being the one that stands out the most), but who would we hire when he's gone who would do better? Last year was almost undoubtedly a playoff year before the injuries (and almost was despite them). I expect the Chiefs to do better this year, but suppose they finish 10-6 and miss the playoffs? That's certainly possible, but it's not worth firing Pioli over. If we lay down a massive turd of a season (say, 4-12 or something), then there's more reason to fire him.

LiveSteam 07-15-2012 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8742480)
I know some people say this, but what exactly should the Hunts do differently?

I dont know. I wish I had an answer. IMO Hunt's only truly care about $$$$$$$$$$
Putting a product on the field that competes is way down the list of Hunt priorities in IMHO.

O.city 07-15-2012 01:16 PM

IMO, this is Cassel's make or break year. Actually last year was, but he wiggled out of that somehow.


Pioli has put a pretty good roster together, but IMO some of his mess ups have been bigger than his successes. If he messes this up with Bowe and we miss the playoffs, that oculd be the dagger.

notorious 07-15-2012 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canofbier (Post 8742482)

Our team was pretty awful when he came aboard, and talent and depth at every position has improved since he arrived (even at QB, arguably).


People seem to forget this too often.

O.city 07-15-2012 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveSteam (Post 8742487)
I dont know. I wish I had an answer. IMO Hunt's only truly care about $$$$$$$$$$
Putting a product on the field that competes is way down the list of Hunt priorities in IMHO.

I was just wondering.



Alot of people say "Blame the Hunts", which is entirely possible that it is their fault. However I don't know what owners can do in this situation to change.

beach tribe 07-15-2012 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedstooge (Post 8742430)
If Clark's sole goal is to make money, Pioli is his man and he will stay.

How does this make ANY sense. Wins= season ticket holders, and more money. So I guess you meant if Clark wants to win, then Pioli is his man, and I have to agree. Even though I know that's not what you meant.
To answer the OP, I would have to say yes. If we do not make the POs, Pioli should at least be on the hot seat.
Man, if wasn't for one position, there really wouldn't be a reason for anyone to say shit. Pioli has done an awesome job at just about everything else, and i know he sees Cassel's short comings because he's done everything he would seemingly need to do put Cassel in position to succeed, and I believe he's gonna have a better season than 2010, no matter how bad we hate him.
Winston, and the running game are going to have more impact than people here realize.

Trivers 07-15-2012 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 8742469)
I think that he stays for at least 5 more years. He has done a good job building a team except for one position.



Too bad it's the most important position.

/end of thread. Well stated.

beach tribe 07-15-2012 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveSteam (Post 8742487)
I dont know. I wish I had an answer. IMO Hunt's only truly care about $$$$$$$$$$
Putting a product on the field that competes is way down the list of Hunt priorities in IMHO.

Again. More wins = more money. SBs = big time bucks. Winning, and making are one in the same.
How someone could believe that clark doesn't want to win regardless of his motives is beyond me.

Ace Gunner 07-15-2012 01:26 PM

I don't think there has been anything to convict Pioli on that would call for a firing anytime soon. He's taken on a huge task imo and done fair with it. I would have parted ways with Cassel as a starter and let it be an open comp now during this whole off season/ota/tc, but he thinks Cassel can get them going again. Got to wait see on that.

Much as you guys don't want to admit it, Cassel has enough talent to at least go to the playoffs with this talented team, but a lot is riding on the regained performance of Jamaal Charles & Eric Berry, Moeaki too, to some degree. Point is, he did it once already with the Chiefs and I think we can agree this year's team should be a bit more talented than the 2010 team.

If Cassel can in fact keep that INT # down while striking once or twice a game, the Chiefs will have a winning season, I would expect. Sorry to say. I hate watching that baseball wind up of his, but if he gets the job done, it will be hard to criticize Pioli for sticking with him another season imo. Maybe Daboll can get these wideouts to get off the ball more quickly and that would help Cassel in the passing game.

I don't expect the Chiefs to do well, myself and I expect Cassel to choke out this season. RC will pull him by season's end. Late in the season after they lose WC/Playoff contention. Maybe game 12, something like that.

LiveSteam 07-15-2012 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 8742521)
Again. More wins = more money. SBs = big time bucks. Winning, and making are one in the same.
How someone could believe that clark doesn't want to win regardless of his motives is beyond me.

He wants to win. But does he want to spend the cash that it takes to put a winner on the field? 40 years of broken down hasbeen's

BoneKrusher 07-15-2012 02:29 PM

wont happen but should happen.

RunKC 07-15-2012 02:32 PM

Look at Pioli's draft this year. All developmental guys.

He isn't going anywhere.

Bearcat 07-15-2012 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 8742521)
Again. More wins = more money. SBs = big time bucks. Winning, and making are one in the same.
How someone could believe that clark doesn't want to win regardless of his motives is beyond me.

Well, there was a significant increase in season ticket after they simply made the playoffs a couple of years ago, and that's not incredibly difficult in today's NFL. I'm sure he wants them to be successful enough to sell out Arrowhead, avoid blackouts, etc... but, that doesn't mean he's passionate about winning a Super Bowl.

R8RFAN 07-15-2012 02:43 PM

No matter what kinda season the Chiefs have... If that stadium is full every week Pioli & Cassell will be there until they retire

Ebolapox 07-15-2012 02:46 PM

N A G G E R

Bowser 07-15-2012 02:49 PM

Probably not, even though it probably should. Anything under 6-10 SHOULD get him fired, though.

Bearcat 07-15-2012 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8742738)
No matter what kinda season the Chiefs have... If that stadium is full every week Pioli & Cassell will be there until they retire

And we're a pretty fickle bunch, so another 9-7/10-6 season and first round playoff exit should do it.

OnTheWarpath15 07-15-2012 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8742738)
No matter what kinda season the Chiefs have... If that stadium is full every week Pioli & Cassell will be there until they retire

The stadium hasn't been anywhere near full on a regular basic since 2006.

007 07-15-2012 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsfootballfan (Post 8742528)
I don't think there has been anything to convict Pioli on that would call for a firing anytime soon. He's taken on a huge task imo and done fair with it. I would have parted ways with Cassel as a starter and let it be an open comp now during this whole off season/ota/tc, but he thinks Cassel can get them going again. Got to wait see on that.

Much as you guys don't want to admit it, Cassel has enough talent to at least go to the playoffs with this talented team, but a lot is riding on the regained performance of Jamaal Charles & Eric Berry, Moeaki too, to some degree. Point is, he did it once already with the Chiefs and I think we can agree this year's team should be a bit more talented than the 2010 team.

If Cassel can in fact keep that INT # down while striking once or twice a game, the Chiefs will have a winning season, I would expect. Sorry to say. I hate watching that baseball wind up of his, but if he gets the job done, it will be hard to criticize Pioli for sticking with him another season imo. Maybe Daboll can get these wideouts to get off the ball more quickly and that would help Cassel in the passing game.

I don't expect the Chiefs to do well, myself and I expect Cassel to choke out this season. RC will pull him by season's end. Late in the season after they lose WC/Playoff contention. Maybe game 12, something like that.

yeah, well I dont' want to just go to the playoffs. I want to win a damn superbowl and Cassel will NEVER do that.

Titty Meat 07-15-2012 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8742798)
The stadium hasn't been anywhere near full on a regular basic since 2006.

That's sad but the corporate dollars/renovation killed the Arrowhead experience.

okcchief 07-15-2012 03:14 PM

Since he's hitched his wagon to Cassel he deserves to go down with him.

007 07-15-2012 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8742836)
That's sad but the corporate dollars/renovation killed the Arrowhead experience.

Renovation only killed the club level.

Bowser 07-15-2012 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 8742852)
Renovation only killed the club level.

It's nice as hell up there, but you feel like you're anywhere but a pro football game.

007 07-15-2012 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8742855)
It's nice as hell up there, but you feel like you're anywhere but a pro football game.

Thats why I wish they would just put up tinted glass on that level. the majority of the people on that level aren't there to watch the game in the elements anyway.

R8RFAN 07-15-2012 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8742790)
And we're a pretty fickle bunch, so another 9-7/10-6 season and first round playoff exit should do it.

Win a couple games in a row and everybody will be on Cassells sack like a fat kid on a jelly doughnut. Then the cycle resets again.

mlyonsd 07-15-2012 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8742864)
Win a couple games in a row and everybody will be on Cassells sack like a fat kid on a jelly doughnut. Then the cycle resets again.

No I think that ship has sailed. I'm as easy going as it gets when it comes to letting the GM/Coach pick their players but even I'm at the point we need a different direction at QB.

007 07-15-2012 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8742864)
Win a couple games in a row and everybody will be on Cassells sack like a fat kid on a jelly doughnut. Then the cycle resets again.

The average fan maybe. Not CP fans.

Trivers 07-15-2012 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 8742861)
Thats why I wish they would just put up tinted glass on that level. the majority of the people on that level aren't there to watch the game in the elements anyway.

They did that in Green Bay. TOTALLY ruins the experience. Might as well as stay home and watch on big screen.

sedated 07-15-2012 03:28 PM

As much as I hate Casshole, Im almost paying more attention to the rookies and 2nd year guys to evaluate Pioli. If they all become productive and/or stars, then we have the foundation of a dynasty. Assuming we get a good QB, of course, and I dont think Pioli is as ready to go down with Cassel as many here think.

sedated 07-15-2012 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8742864)
Win a couple games in a row and everybody will be on Cassells sack like a fat kid on a jelly doughnut. Then the cycle resets again.

Apparently you werent here 2 years ago.

Titty Meat 07-15-2012 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 8742852)
Renovation only killed the club level.

Didn't all ticket prices go up after the renovations?

Anyway the MNF was cool but the other games felt different.


Oh and the PA announcer sucks the old one kicked ass.

007 07-15-2012 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trivers (Post 8742869)
They did that in Green Bay. TOTALLY ruins the experience. Might as well as stay home and watch on big screen.

The people buying tickets on those levels aren't there for the game anyway. Not now at least. They would rather be inside watching the game on TV. Makes no ****ing sense to me at all.

the club level is an absolute embarrassment now.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-15-2012 03:32 PM

Nope

mcaj22 07-15-2012 03:33 PM

if we win a couple games in a row it will be because of the defense, the return of Berry and his impact or things like Charles and Hillis or Bowe, someone of actual talent putting the team on his back and making up for the awful hindrance at QB.

Nobody is going to get behind Cassel because he threw for 190 yards with 1 touchdown and 1 pick and won us a couple games in a row with those averages.

He will never go out there and throw a 70 percent game with a 400 yard average and 3 or 4 touchdowns to boot, in a hot streak where he single handed wins us games, like an Eli or Aaron Rodgers or Peyton, or Brees or any QB on a good team, can do.

Bugeater 07-15-2012 03:33 PM

If we have a bad season Pioli will just throw Crennel under the bus.

milkman 07-15-2012 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canofbier (Post 8742482)
We were technically last place last year, but it's not nearly the same magnitude of "last place" as the first time. We were as close as making one of two blocked field goals in that horrible game against the Raiders to winning the division for a second consecutive year.

Our team may not be a perennial contender yet, but you can see the progress. Our team was pretty awful when he came aboard, and talent and depth at every position has improved since he arrived (even at QB, arguably). He demonstrated this offseason that he's able to land top-flight free agents (Winston).

Obviously, he's made some mistakes (Cassel's massive contract being the one that stands out the most), but who would we hire when he's gone who would do better? Last year was almost undoubtedly a playoff year before the injuries (and almost was despite them). I expect the Chiefs to do better this year, but suppose they finish 10-6 and miss the playoffs? That's certainly possible, but it's not worth firing Pioli over. If we lay down a massive turd of a season (say, 4-12 or something), then there's more reason to fire him.

Pioli has taken on a rebuilding project that involves doing it the old fashioned way.

Through the draft.

That takes time.

The problem, aside from the most obvious, is that the foundation of that project was drafted by the previous regime.

We've already lost one piece of that foundation in Carr, and Bowe might well be the next piece.

I still contend that his 2010 draft was not nearly the great draft that others seem to believe it to be.

Dexter McCluster is just a guy, and Javier Arenas is a great 4th round pick, that we took in the second round.

I also still contend that this team would be further along if Bill KuHarich had been promoted to the GM spot, and Herman ****ing Edwards had been replaced with Ron Rivera, who I wanted the most at that time, or Jim Swartz.

Of course, that would not have happened, given Clark Hunt's affinity for Herman ****ing Edwards.

So at the end of the day, the man most responsible for all this shit is Hunt, as has been the case for the last 40 years.

Titty Meat 07-15-2012 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8742895)
Pioli has taken on a rebuilding project that involves doing it the old fashioned way.

Through the draft.

That takes time.

The problem, aside from the most obvious, is that the foundation of that project was drafted by the previous regime.

We've already lost one piece of that foundation in Carr, and Bowe might well be the next piece.

I still contend that his 2010 draft was not nearly the great draft that others seem to believe it to be.

Dexter McCluster is just a guy, and Javier Arenas is a great 4th round pick, that we took in the second round.

I also still contend that this team would be further along if Bill KuHarich had been promoted to the GM spot, and Herman ****ing Edwards had been replaced with Ron Rivera, who I wanted the most at that time, or Jim Swartz.

Of course, that would not have happened, given Clark Hunt's affinity for Herman ****ing Edwards.

So at the end of the day, the man most responsible for all this shit is Hunt, as has been the case for the last 40 years.

Would you fire Pioli and lure a guy like Andy Reid who will be fired after this year?

LiveSteam 07-15-2012 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8742895)

So at the end of the day, the man most responsible for all this shit is Hunt, as has been the case for the last 40 years.

:hail:

007 07-15-2012 03:42 PM

Hunt, the man that lost his balls after the Chiefs only superbowl win.

mcaj22 07-15-2012 03:46 PM

Andy Reid will never be fired

milkman 07-15-2012 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8742899)
Would you fire Pioli and lure a guy like Andy Reid who will be fired after this year?

No.

I've always felt that Reid was overrated, and that Jimmy Johnson was the biggest reason for Reid's success.

My first choice today, as it was when Carl was fired, would be to lure Eric DeCosta to KC.

007 07-15-2012 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 8742908)
Andy Reid will never be fired

Which is amazing considering its phickle Philly phans.

mcaj22 07-15-2012 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 8742913)
Which is amazing considering its phickle Philly phans.


I also hear "Fire Charlie Manuel and Fire Doug Collins" all the time too from the same Philly fans

okcchief 07-15-2012 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8742864)
Win a couple games in a row and everybody will be on Cassells sack like a fat kid on a jelly doughnut. Then the cycle resets again.

It would take at least one playoff win with Cassel performing well. Don't hold your breath.

007 07-15-2012 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 8742924)
It would take at least one playoff win with Cassel performing well. Don't hold your breath.

playoff - win - cassel - well

one of these does not belong.

Bowser 07-15-2012 04:00 PM

IIRC, Milkman wanted DeCosta back in 2009.

Bugeater 07-15-2012 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8742939)
IIRC, Milkman wanted DeCosta back in 2009.

Great memory. He posted that 14 minutes ago.

007 07-15-2012 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 8742941)
Great memory. He posted that 14 minutes ago.

LMAO

BigMeatballDave 07-15-2012 04:20 PM

Ask Clark

Sannyasi 07-15-2012 04:22 PM

I hadn't really considered the possibility of this being Pioli's last season, but the more I think about it its harder for me to justify keeping him around if Crennel and the team fail this year.

Its like Groundhogs Day where Pioli continues to repeat his biggest mistake year after year, trotting out Matt Cassel and hoping this season will be different. Its maddening.

saphojunkie 07-15-2012 04:23 PM

My question is, if Pioli gets rid of Cassel, then will you still hate him? If Romeo pulls Cassel after the bye week, and we draft a QB in the first round next year, someone like Tyler Bray or Logan Thomas, will you still hate Pioli?

Because he will have done what no Chiefs GM has done for thirty years.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-15-2012 04:27 PM

AFC West Champs

BoneKrusher 07-15-2012 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 8742973)
My question is, if Pioli gets rid of Cassel, then will you still hate him? If Romeo pulls Cassel after the bye week, and we draft a QB in the first round next year, someone like Tyler Bray or Logan Thomas, will you still hate Pioli?

Because he will have done what no Chiefs GM has done for thirty years.

the only things i dont like about the job Pioli's done in KC so far was trading for Cassel, Hiring Haley and bustin Bowes Balls.

if he gets rid of Cassel, i'll forgive him. :D

Pasta Little Brioni 07-15-2012 04:31 PM

Ricky Stanzi

Sannyasi 07-15-2012 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 8742973)
My question is, if Pioli gets rid of Cassel, then will you still hate him? If Romeo pulls Cassel after the bye week, and we draft a QB in the first round next year, someone like Tyler Bray or Logan Thomas, will you still hate Pioli?

Because he will have done what no Chiefs GM has done for thirty years.

It would eliminate my biggest complaint about Pioli's tenure, but I'd continue to wonder why it took him three years to figure out something that the rest of us knew in the beginning, in regards to Cassel's (in)ability at quarterback.

ChiefsCountry 07-15-2012 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8742910)
My first choice today, as it was when Carl was fired, would be to lure Eric DeCosta to KC.

I wonder how different our roster would be today with DeCosta and Rex Ryan running the show. Or DeCosta and Jim Schwartz.

philfree 07-15-2012 04:45 PM

Quote:

Does anything less than a playoff appearance = Bye Bye Pioli?

NO.

milkman 07-15-2012 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 8743005)
I wonder how different our roster would be today with DeCosta and Rex Ryan running the show. Or DeCosta and Jim Schwartz.

Don't really like the idea of Rex Ryan as coach.

Overall, I like the approach that Pioli, and Martin Mayhew, have taken in building.

The difference is that Mayhew had less to start with, but he drafted Matt Stafford and hired Swartz, so the Lions, who were worse than the Chiefs at the time Pioli and Mayhew took over their respective teams, are well ahead of the Chiefs.

OnTheWarpath15 07-15-2012 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8743018)
Don't really like the idea of Rex Ryan as coach.

Overall, I like the approach that Pioli, and Martin Mayhew, have taken in building.

The difference is that Mayhew had less to start with, but he drafted Matt Stafford and hired Swartz, so the Lions, who were worse than the Chiefs at the time Pioli and Mayhew took over their respective teams, are well ahead of the Chiefs.

I remember when I said this back in 2010, and was laughed at.

philfree 07-15-2012 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8743018)
Don't really like the idea of Rex Ryan as coach.

Overall, I like the approach that Pioli, and Martin Mayhew, have taken in building.

The difference is that Mayhew had less to start with, but he drafted Matt Stafford and hired Swartz, so the Lions, who were worse than the Chiefs at the time Pioli and Mayhew took over their respective teams, are well ahead of the Chiefs.

I'm not saying One GM is better then the other but draft position is king when it comes to a rebuild like the Chiefs and Lions(They've been rebuilding forever.) have been going through. One or two spots toward the top of the draft can make a huge difference. We had no chance at Stafford or any other legit QB prospect where we've picked at the top of the draft.

OnTheWarpath15 07-15-2012 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 8743070)
I'm not saying One GM is better then the other but draft position is king when it comes to a rebuild like the Chiefs and Lions(They've been rebuilding forever.) have been going through. One or two spots toward the top of the draft can make a huge difference. We had no chance at Stafford or any other legit QB prospect where we've picked at the top of the draft.

Yeah, and Washington had no chance at RGIII from where they picked.

No more excuses.

O.city 07-15-2012 05:28 PM

Of course the Lions are in a better spot than we are. They were "lucky" enough to figure out/draft a franchise qb who happens to be a stud. Add that to the fact that they drafted top 5 in what seems like 10 drafts in a row.


Until we get a quarterback to lead the ship, we are worse off than teams that have one, no matter the rest of the roster.

OnTheWarpath15 07-15-2012 05:28 PM

Oh, and this board went out of their way to claim this asshole as the greatest GM in professional sports, so a playoff appearance in Year Four is letting him off the hook.

Ace Gunner 07-15-2012 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8743018)
Don't really like the idea of Rex Ryan as coach.

Overall, I like the approach that Pioli, and Martin Mayhew, have taken in building.

The difference is that Mayhew had less to start with, but he drafted Matt Stafford and hired Swartz, so the Lions, who were worse than the Chiefs at the time Pioli and Mayhew took over their respective teams, are well ahead of the Chiefs.

I think the Lions were well ahead of the Chiefs in 2009 and still slightly ahead now, which means Pioli is gaining on Mayhew.

philfree 07-15-2012 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8743075)
Yeah, and Washington had no chance at RGIII from where they picked.

No more excuses.

It's not an excuse just reality.

Do you think we could have traded up for Stafford? I don't. :shrug:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.