ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Another person linking Polian's to KC (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=267776)

ChiefMojo 12-17-2012 05:04 PM

Another person linking Polian's to KC
 
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/2...t-comes-to-gms

Like Pro Football Weekly, now Jason La Canfora with CBS Sports is saying that the Polian's may be at the top of the Chiefs possible GM list. Polian's (Bill and Chris) are very hands on front office people and of course we know that is how Clark likes it to work (as he is very hands off).

007 12-17-2012 05:09 PM

q

ChiefMojo 12-17-2012 05:12 PM

Where is the other thread? Would be more than happy to delete this one if I know where the other is at?

ncCHIEFfan 12-17-2012 05:13 PM

Guess it could be worse ( Pioli ) but nothing to really get excited about

ChiefMojo 12-17-2012 05:16 PM

Well I don't really know how to feel about the Polian's to be honest. Sure Bill has had a lot of success through the years with three different franchises. He fits the style of front office man that Clark wants, which is why he is probably at the top of the list.

With that said, how would he run the defense? Would he try to make us small and fast like his Indy teams or somewhere in between? One would assume we would move away from the 3-4 to the 4-3 correct?

Dr. Johnny Fever 12-17-2012 05:17 PM

Excuse my ignorance but which one are we talking about as GM? I know they both worked for Indy (ok I know Bill did as GM) but what was Chris' role? I guess I don't understand 2 guys being candidates in the same role but I'm obviously missing something.

htismaqe 12-17-2012 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Johnny Fever (Post 9219064)
Excuse my ignorance but which one are we talking about as GM? I know they both worked for Indy (ok I know Bill did as GM) but what was Chris' role? I guess I don't understand 2 guys being candidates in the same role but I'm obviously missing something.

It's called nepotism.

Bill would be the GM and Chris would be the GM-in-waiting.

Crush 12-17-2012 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Johnny Fever (Post 9219064)
Excuse my ignorance but which one are we talking about as GM? I know they both worked for Indy (ok I know Bill did as GM) but what was Chris' role? I guess I don't understand 2 guys being candidates in the same role but I'm obviously missing something.

Chris would be GM and Bill would be President of Peyton Manning.

Dr. Johnny Fever 12-17-2012 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9219066)
It's called nepotism.

Bill would be the GM and Chris would be the GM-in-waiting.

I see. That's the way it was in Indy if I'm not mistaken? What would Chris' actual title be?

Crush 12-17-2012 05:19 PM

I do not like Polian at all. The Colts roster and scouting department went to shit when Chris was promoted to GM.

Crush 12-17-2012 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Johnny Fever (Post 9219072)
I see. That's the way it was in Indy if I'm not mistaken? What would Chris' actual title be?

Probably Assistant GM or Executive Coffee Boy.

Shag 12-17-2012 05:20 PM

Not a fan...

Dr. Johnny Fever 12-17-2012 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crush (Post 9219076)
Probably Assistant GM or Executive Coffee Boy.

Gotcha. Thanks.

ChiefMojo 12-17-2012 05:24 PM

I admit I don't know how I feel about the Polian's yet. As other said, Chris hasn't proved to be the best at his job yet but he is still young. Bill did a lot of great things but he is old.

I just know they are better than Pioli!

O.city 12-17-2012 05:27 PM

Everyone needs to go to the SOC thread and read Marty's post.

aturnis 12-17-2012 06:19 PM

The next banner needs to say no to the Polians...

Tribal Warfare 12-17-2012 06:21 PM

As I said in the SOC thread La Confora has zero credibility when has to do with anything concerning the Chiefs.

BlackHelicopters 12-17-2012 06:22 PM

Do not want.

Barret 12-17-2012 08:06 PM

Wasn't there a thread about how Bill and Chris were actually worse then Pioli is currently and how the owner of the Colts had to basically fire both of them to wrestle his team back?

BossChief 12-17-2012 08:12 PM

Polian would draft Geno Smith.

Hog's Gone Fishin 12-17-2012 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9219046)
Where is the other thread? Would be more than happy to delete this one if I know where the other is at?

Check chiefsplanet.com

ghak99 12-17-2012 09:36 PM

I thought they run them out of Pony town for being egotistical pricks who couldn't draft for shit??

ChiefMojo 12-17-2012 10:01 PM

Hog I swear I've heard of that site before?

cdcox 12-17-2012 10:04 PM

What exactly are the Polians possessing that are being linked to KC?

ShortRoundChief 12-17-2012 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghak99 (Post 9219816)
I thought they run them out of Pony town for being egotistical pricks who couldn't draft for shit??

Well hell. They'd fit right in.

ShortRoundChief 12-17-2012 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9219062)
Well I don't really know how to feel about the Polian's to be honest. Sure Bill has had a lot of success through the years with three different franchises. He fits the style of front office man that Clark wants, which is why he is probably at the top of the list.

With that said, how would he run the defense? Would he try to make us small and fast like his Indy teams or somewhere in between? One would assume we would move away from the 3-4 to the 4-3 correct?

We're already small. Fast, meh, not so much

Chief Roundup 12-17-2012 10:22 PM

Well hmmm this is making more and more sense. On MNF they said that Tom Moore was wanting to have a comeback at OC.

Shox 12-17-2012 10:35 PM

Not sure I like this idea. What did he do other than ride Peyton Manning. He never could build a defense for him.

mcaj22 12-17-2012 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barret (Post 9219572)
Wasn't there a thread about how Bill and Chris were actually worse then Pioli is currently and how the owner of the Colts had to basically fire both of them to wrestle his team back?

yes and in one season the owner and new FO/coaches came in and cut 3/4s of the Polian players on the roster, essentially keeping one WR, two good DEs and maybe a young guy here or there that eventually got demoted to 2nd or 3rd string anywayby the new GM's players

GoChargers 12-18-2012 12:16 AM

Polian is just a hyped-up AJ Smith. Bad choice for the Chiefs if true.

DaneMcCloud 12-18-2012 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9219869)
What exactly are the Polians possessing that are being linked to KC?

Bill was a Chiefs scout in the late 70's, worked with Marv, Steadman and Schaaf.

Personally, I think it's bullshit and hope that Clark is more "creative", but who knows.

At least Bill Polian values the QB position.

Mother****erJones 12-18-2012 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 9220132)
Polian is just a hyped-up AJ Smith. Bad choice for the Chiefs if true.

Except Polian drafted possibly the greatest QB of all-time. And won a Super Bowl with Colts, got the Panthers close

Titty Meat 12-18-2012 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9220138)
Except Polian drafted possibly the greatest QB of all-time. And won a Super Bowl with Colts, got the Panthers close

And took the Bills to 3 super bowls

DaneMcCloud 12-18-2012 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9220141)
And took the Bills to 3 super bowls

Polian was fired after the 3rd.

He didn't "take" them, Jim Kelly did.

And he was drafted 3 years before Polian arrived.

KCWolfman 12-18-2012 12:38 AM

Weird idea, how about a coach with more control instead of another control hungry GM? It doesn't seem to have worked well with the last two.

DaneMcCloud 12-18-2012 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCWolfman (Post 9220167)
Weird idea, how about a coach with more control instead of another control hungry GM? It doesn't seem to have worked well with the last two.

Yeah, that makes total sense.

Give the head coach ALL the power and responsibility.

History has proven that always works out well.

Titty Meat 12-18-2012 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9220162)
Polian was fired after the 3rd.

He didn't "take" them, Jim Kelly did.

And he was drafted 3 years before Polian arrived.

He certainly played a huge part in building a team that went to 3 super bowls saying otherwise would be dishonest.

DaneMcCloud 12-18-2012 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9220179)
He certainly played a huge part in building a team that went to 3 super bowls saying otherwise would be dishonest.

Please explain.

Kelly was drafted in 1983 but didn't report until 1986.

Bruce Smith was chosen in 1985.

Polian's wasn't hired as GM until 1986. His tenure only lasted until 1993 and he left the team in shambles, much like his stint in Carolina and later, Indy.

Titty Meat 12-18-2012 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9220198)
Please explain.

Kelly was drafted in 1983 but didn't report until 1986.

Bruce Smith was chosen in 1985.

Polian's wasn't hired as GM until 1986. His tenure only lasted until 1993 and he left the team in shambles, much like his stint in Carolina and later, Indy.

I was too young to remember much of his years in Buffalo beside the last few. I know he drafted Thurman Thomas who played a huge part in Buffalos success. Didn't he hire Levy too?

Indy went to shit when his son took over. His drafts were usually pretty solid until about 2006.

He's not a long term answer but in the short term (3-4 years) he's one of the better choices. I just hope that if he does come here the head coach is able to get Chris Polian kicked out of here when Bill's time is over.

cdcox 12-18-2012 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9220207)
I was too young to remember much of his years in Buffalo beside the last few. I know he drafted Thurman Thomas who played a huge part in Buffalos success. Didn't he hire Levy too?

Indy went to shit when his son took over. His drafts were usually pretty solid until about 2006.

He's not a long term answer but in the short term (3-4 years) he's one of the better choices. I just hope that if he does come here the head coach is able to get Chris Polian kicked out of here when Bill's time is over.

Clark wants a long term solution. In light of that, and the bad rep that Chris has, here is how I see it, with odds:

a) Clark sticks to his plan and doesn't hire the Polians because of Chris (50%)
b) Clark likes Chris, hires them, Chris is a disaster like everyone thinks, and 8 years from now everyone is cursing this hire (35%)
c) Clark likes Chris, hires them, Chris turns the corner, and the Chiefs become a dynasty (5%)
c) Clark likes Bill, but is weary of Chris, hires them as a short term fix against his preference, and re-evaluates Chris when Bill is done. (10%)

ShortRoundChief 12-18-2012 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9220162)
Polian was fired after the 3rd.

He didn't "take" them, Jim Kelly did.

And he was drafted 3 years before Polian arrived.

Dane. I love you, but that's a bullshit double standard.

Mi_chief_fan 12-18-2012 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9220171)
Yeah, that makes total sense.

Give the head coach ALL the power and responsibility.

History has proven that always works out well.

I may have missed something, but I didn't see where Russ said give "all" power and responsibility, but the opposite sure isn't working in KC.

Quesadilla Joe 12-18-2012 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9219902)
Well hmmm this is making more and more sense. On MNF they said that Tom Moore was wanting to have a comeback at OC.

If Mike McCoy leaves I wouldn't be surprised to see Tom Moore replace him. Tom Moore (and Bill Polian actually) both were guests of the Broncos in the game at Carolina. And Tom Moore spent a week at Broncos training camp this year.

Mother****erJones 12-18-2012 06:35 AM

At least Polian has been there done that. Pioli didnt. KC was his first gig and we've seen he's a fraud.

BoneKrusher 12-18-2012 06:48 AM

the way i see it, the Polian's have gotta be an upgrade over the last 4 years.

Mother****erJones 12-18-2012 06:57 AM

Polian also knows to win you need a franchise QB and must draft one

BoneKrusher 12-18-2012 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9220333)
Polian also knows to win you need a franchise QB and must draft one

yeah exactly.
Peeoli has fielded a team w/o a QB for 4 years.

King_Chief_Fan 12-18-2012 07:40 AM

We all know this can't be true. Pioli signed an extension and is ready to go to work.

BoneKrusher 12-18-2012 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 9220365)
We all know this can't be true. Pioli signed an extension and is ready to go to work.

if True, Clark is dumber than i thought.

007 12-18-2012 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9219212)
As I said in the SOC thread La Confora has zero credibility when has to do with anything concerning the Chiefs.

Q :D

Chief Faithful 12-18-2012 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9220137)
Bill was a Chiefs scout in the late 70's, worked with Marv, Steadman and Schaaf.

Wow, that represents the worst drafting period in Chiefs history.

suds79 12-18-2012 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 9220374)
if True, Clark is dumber than i thought.

It's not true. No way.

I'm convinced that Scott Pioli is currently not in charge. Otherwise he would have never, never have cut Stanford Routt.

BoneKrusher 12-18-2012 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 9220468)
It's not true. No way.

I'm convinced that Scott Pioli is currently not in charge. Otherwise he would have never, never have cut Stanford Routt.

i'm thinking the same way.
he must have had all life drained from his fat ass when Cassel was benched.:D

loochy 12-18-2012 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9219026)
Another person linking Polian's to KC

Polian's what is linked to KC? It doesn't say.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9219026)
Like Pro Football Weekly, now Jason La Canfora with CBS Sports is saying that the Polian's may be at the top of the Chiefs possible GM list.

Once again, the Polian's what is at the top of the list?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9219026)
Polian's (Bill and Chris) are very hands on front office people and of course we know that is how Clark likes it to work (as he is very hands off).

Polian's whats are very hands on?

:doh!:

patteeu 12-18-2012 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9219207)
The next banner needs to say no to the Polians...

:facepalm:

suds79 12-18-2012 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9219207)
The next banner needs to say no to the Polians...

Because what he did in Indy, Buffalo & Carolina was total shit. :shake:

Pasta Little Brioni 12-18-2012 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 9220347)
yeah exactly.
Peeoli has fielded a team w/o a QB for 4 years.

So have the Jets :D

BoneKrusher 12-18-2012 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9220488)
So have the Jets :D

and look where both teams sit today.

Mr. Laz 12-18-2012 08:36 AM

at this point, isn't it becoming rather 'circular'


reports start using other reports as sources etc


good news is that Polian didn't leave the colts completely devoid of talent as much as people thought

BoneKrusher 12-18-2012 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9220495)
at this point, isn't it becoming rather 'circular'


reports start using other reports as sources etc


good news is that Polian didn't leave the colts completely devoid of talent as much as people thought

exactly, they'll make the playoffs with a rookie QB and an assistant coach as HC.

Mother****erJones 12-18-2012 09:03 AM

The difference in polian acting like a control freak is he's earned it pioli hasn't and sucks at GM to boot. Every where polians been they've won

BoneKrusher 12-18-2012 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9220570)
The difference in polian acting like a control freak is he's earned it pioli hasn't and sucks at GM to boot. Every where polians been they've won

yep

Dayze 12-18-2012 09:18 AM

I can't believe how horrible Pioli has been. I was stoked about the hire, but man....he has been absolute dog shit.
Aside from re-signing some of Carl's players, he's done absloutely jack shit.

Berry - who is still progressing

.....I can't think of any other good thing he's done. Hudson? Houston looks like it'll pan out.
that's a shitty percentage of 'hits' in 4 god damn years.

Mother****erJones 12-18-2012 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9220613)
I can't believe how horrible Pioli has been. I was stoked about the hire, but man....he has been absolute dog shit.
Aside from re-signing some of Carl's players, he's done absloutely jack shit.

Berry - who is still progressing

.....I can't think of any other good thing he's done. Hudson? Houston looks like it'll pan out.
that's a shitty percentage of 'hits' in 4 god damn years.

Just about everyone did man I'm disappointed. Now it's time to try again and keep trying.

Mother****erJones 12-18-2012 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9220613)
I can't believe how horrible Pioli has been. I was stoked about the hire, but man....he has been absolute dog shit.
Aside from re-signing some of Carl's players, he's done absloutely jack shit.

Berry - who is still progressing

.....I can't think of any other good thing he's done. Hudson? Houston looks like it'll pan out.
that's a shitty percentage of 'hits' in 4 god damn years.

What's even worse, is that he's doing all the thinking he doesn't have anyone challenging his opinions

WhiteWhale 12-18-2012 09:22 AM

Bill Polian is a great GM. I'd love to have a guy that solid.

I'm not convinced that hiring him (which really means hiring his son) is a good call. Nepotism and Cronyism are things I"m tired of in KC, and once Bill rides off into the sunset, what is Chris gonna do?

BoneKrusher 12-18-2012 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9220613)
I can't believe how horrible Pioli has been. I was stoked about the hire, but man....he has been absolute dog shit.
Aside from re-signing some of Carl's players, he's done absloutely jack shit.

Berry - who is still progressing

.....I can't think of any other good thing he's done. Hudson? Houston looks like it'll pan out.
that's a shitty percentage of 'hits' in 4 god damn years.

i was stoked at the time as well and a friend of mine (a Steeler Fan) said the week he was signed you gotta remember the Patriot way is Tom Brady not Scott Peeoli.

and he was spot on.

BoneKrusher 12-18-2012 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9220633)
Bill Polian is a great GM. I'd love to have a guy that solid.

I'm not convinced that hiring him (which really means hiring his son) is a good call. Nepotism and Cronyism are things I"m tired of in KC, and once Bill rides off into the sunset, what is Chris gonna do?

they left the Colts in good shape so i'd trust them.

King_Chief_Fan 12-18-2012 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9220477)
Polian's what is linked to KC? It doesn't say.



Once again, the Polian's what is at the top of the list?



Polian's whats are very hands on?

:doh!:

you punctuation police are hard nosed today

RUSH 12-18-2012 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 9220645)
they left the Colts in good shape so i'd trust them.

Why are people saying this? He did not leave them in good shape. Grigson had to turn over most of the roster because it was so terrible.

Grigson nailed the draft and free agency this year and that's the only reason they are competitive. Luck, Hilton, Fleener, Allen, and Ballard are all key contributors and a huge part of their success. Avery, Davis, Redding and Brazill were also picked up by Grigson.

The only impact players that Polian left behind were Bethea, Mathis, and Wayne. That's it. Freeney sucks now. The o line is terrible and the defense is a joke.

Brock 12-18-2012 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RUSH (Post 9220687)
Why are people saying this? He did not leave them in good shape. Grigson had to turn over most of the roster because it was so terrible.

Grigson nailed the draft and free agency this year and that's the only reason they are competitive. Luck, Hilton, Fleener, Allen, and Ballard are all key contributors and a huge part of their success. Avery, Davis, Redding and Brazill were also picked up by Grigson.

The only impact players that Polian left behind were Bethea, Mathis, and Wayne. That's it. Freeney sucks now. The o line is terrible and the defense is a joke.

I am tending to agree with this. Of course, on the other hand, if Polian was still in Indianapolis, and Peyton weren't traded, they'd most likely still be headed to the playoffs again.

Chief Roundup 12-18-2012 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 9220645)
they left the Colts in good shape so i'd trust them.

never go full reerun.

htismaqe 12-18-2012 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RUSH (Post 9220687)
Why are people saying this? He did not leave them in good shape. Grigson had to turn over most of the roster because it was so terrible.

Grigson nailed the draft and free agency this year and that's the only reason they are competitive. Luck, Hilton, Fleener, Allen, and Ballard are all key contributors and a huge part of their success. Avery, Davis, Redding and Brazill were also picked up by Grigson.

The only impact players that Polian left behind were Bethea, Mathis, and Wayne. That's it. Freeney sucks now. The o line is terrible and the defense is a joke.

Their offensive line has been bad for a while. Manning masked a lot of problems.

loochy 12-18-2012 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 9220658)
you punctuation police are hard nosed today

It's for your own protection.

KCWolfman 12-18-2012 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9220171)
Yeah, that makes total sense.

Give the head coach ALL the power and responsibility.

History has proven that always works out well.

If we are talking history, how has the power mad GM worked out for us for twenty years now?

I never stated ALL, I stated MORE.

KCWolfman 12-18-2012 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mi_chief_fan (Post 9220306)
I may have missed something, but I didn't see where Russ said give "all" power and responsibility, but the opposite sure isn't working in KC.

Precisely, MI.

Chief Roundup 12-18-2012 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9220733)
Their offensive line has been bad for a while. Manning masked a lot of problems.

Very true that an elite QB will help in hide issues that a team has. They have to though. You have to expect that out of them when you are paying them 18 to 19 mil a year. Same with an elite pass rusher or LT. The proportion of the dollars says that those players will have to hide/mask players or positions that are not very good.

Mr. Laz 12-18-2012 10:17 AM

Part of the Indy problem was Manning's salary killed their cap.

But they had to keep Manning so the Oline etc suffered.

KCWolfman 12-18-2012 10:18 AM

Just imagine a Jerry Reese style GM who takes a middle of the pack payroll to the Superbowl without having to force his name to the front page while having a Bill Cowher style coach with some shared control of the front office.

htismaqe 12-18-2012 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCWolfman (Post 9220794)
Just imagine a Jerry Reese style GM who takes a middle of the pack payroll to the Superbowl without having to force his name to the front page while having a Bill Cowher style coach with some shared control of the front office.

This.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.