ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Covitz:Chiefs GM John Dorsey likes what he’s seen of the team (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=273246)

Tribal Warfare 05-21-2013 08:01 PM

Covitz:Chiefs GM John Dorsey likes what he’s seen of the team
 
Chiefs GM John Dorsey likes what he’s seen of the team
By RANDY COVITZ
The Kansas City Star
The Chiefs reached the halfway mark of their first voluntary offseason program under their new regime, and general manager John Dorsey was as upbeat on Tuesday as when he was hired on Jan. 14.

Dorsey and new head coach Andy Reid have had a rookie minicamp and four days of on-field practices to evaluate their first draft class, the veteran players they acquired and those who were inherited.

“So far, so good,” Dorsey said. “I’m excited with the direction we’re headed. I can’t say enough about how the guys have practiced, how the coaching staff has begun to teach these young men … It couldn’t be any better. These five months … have been everything I thought it would be.”

The Chiefs have turned over half the roster from the wreckage of last year’s team that went 2-14. Of the 90 players on the current roster, 53 are newcomers, and Dorsey and Reid aren’t done yet.

“Each team on a year-to-year basis has its own identity, and I’m trying to work through ... who is this team? That’s what I’m trying to see.

“We haven’t played a game yet. We’re still in the honeymoon period. We’ll be judged for what we do on the football field.”

Dorsey, who spent the previous 13 years in the Green Bay Packers’ personnel department, cited several pleasant surprises he’s seen so far.

“I knew (safety) Eric Berry was a good player, but I didn’t realize what a really good football player he is,” Dorsey said of the two-time Pro Bowler. “I didn’t realize (wide receiver) Dwayne Bowe could be as good as Dwayne Bowe wants to be. (Running back) Jamaal Charles, you have to utilize a guy like him. … Our two outside linebackers (Tamba Hali and Justin Houston) are as good as advertised.”

Dorsey’s biggest offseason acquisition was trading a second-round pick in this year’s draft and conditional second- or third-rounder in next year’s draft to San Francisco for quarterback Alex Smith. He hasn’t been disappointed with Smith.

“I really like what Alex Smith is doing,” Dorsey said. “How far he’s grasped this offense, and I can see the head coach loading him up, because he’s a smart kid, he’s physically talented.”

Dorsey signed former Missouri quarterback Chase Daniel as Smith’s backup. Dorsey is confident Daniel can be productive in the event Smith goes down with an injury — as Smith did a year ago with a concussion at San Francisco. Daniel attempted just nine passes in three years as Drew Brees’ backup at New Orleans and has no proven track record.

“You could have said that about Matt Hasselbeck,” Dorsey said of Brett Favre’s one-time backup in Green Bay who eventually led Seattle to a Super Bowl. “He was like Mr. August. When you look at the backup quarterback, you want a highly motivated, competitive individual who understands his role and is willing to step up on a moment’s notice and is ready to take the baton when it’s handed to him.

“I feel very comfortable with Chase in his role and in his abilities. Once you get him in this offense in the preseason, he’ll show people why we brought him into this organization.”

Dorsey’s other marquee move was the selection of offensive tackle Eric Fisher of Central Michigan with the first pick of the NFL draft over Texas A&M’s Luke Joeckel. Fisher, a left tackle in college, is running with the first unit at right tackle as veteran Branden Albert occupies the left side.

“I find it interesting with offensive linemen who are selected so high, when they begin to blend into the group, you forget about them,” Dorsey said. “It’s like, ‘My gosh, it’s like he’s a veteran out there.’ Athletically, Eric is as talented as we thought he was. Like any rookie coming into the NFL, going to a new team, he’s going to have to work at the technical stuff. That comes with a little time. Everything he’s done to this point, I couldn’t be happier.

“I’m very happy with this draft class. I think there are a couple of surprises among the college free agents. I’m not going to name any names, but all along, we have said, if we can find three, four free agents to make this team, that helps down the road. “

In addition to Daniel, the Chiefs brought in several veteran free agents, and already it appears tight end Anthony Fasano, defensive end Mike DeVito, cornerbacks Sean Smith and Dunta Robinson and possibly inside linebackers Akeem Jordan and Zac Diles are going to play key roles this season.

“(Defensive coordinator) Bob Sutton likes big press corners, so you have to give him players like Sean Smith,” Dorsey said. “I like Dunta Robinson’s approach to the game, his true professionalism. … Everybody has done everything I thought they’d be doing.”

Certainly, there have been some disappointments, but Dorsey did not want to address them.

“Are there positions on the roster that need to be improved?” he said. “Yes there are. I’m not going to say which ones, but we’re not done turning this roster over until training camp or I wouldn’t be doing my job. I’m living in the present with an eye on the future.

“When you get a chance to be with a coaching staff like Andy Reid, you want to make sure you give him all the tools you can to succeed.”

One of those tools was hiring former Nevada head football coach Chris Ault as a consultant. Ault is the guru of the pistol offense that San Francisco used so effectively last season, and the Chiefs have dabbled with the formation in the offseason program.

“In today’s football you’ve seen a high degree of success with the pistol offense,” Dorsey said. “It was pretty ingenious by Andy to get the guy who was the architect of the pistol offense and give him a consultant’s role to help defend it and to run it. I think that was pretty sharp.”

Dorsey, who worked with Reid at Green Bay in the 1990s, believes the veteran Reid, at 55, has been re-energized in Kansas City.

“What’s good about him is he’s got a bounce in his step and is loving the heck out of coaching,” Dorsey said of Reid, who spent the last 14 years as Philadelphia’s head coach. “He’s breaking down every little detail. Guys don’t realize how much he sees.

“I love how much fun he’s having. He’s enjoying himself. When he can enjoy himself, that means good things for this organization.”

Tribal Warfare 05-21-2013 08:04 PM

Quote:

Dorsey:“I really like what Alex Smith is doing,” Dorsey said. “How far he’s grasped this offense, and I can see the head coach loading him up, because he’s a smart kid, he’s physically talented.”
Not a real ringing endorsement there

WV 05-21-2013 08:17 PM

John Dorsey's offseason and draft moves need to work out really well for me to regain the enthusiasm I had for him before said moves.

So far I don't think he has proven to be as he was advertised.

Mr. Laz 05-21-2013 08:19 PM

blah,blah,blah ... win or **** off.

BlackHelicopters 05-21-2013 08:21 PM

Winning cures all.

Direckshun 05-21-2013 08:21 PM

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VoymN5uzMX0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

sd4chiefs 05-21-2013 08:23 PM

I hate all these fluffy feel good storys in the off season about how good this player looking or that player is looking or the team is really looking good. They have one almost every day in the San Diego paper and it's all BU*LSH*T.

PRIEST 05-21-2013 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9698635)
blah,blah,blah ... win or **** off.





This

OnTheWarpath15 05-21-2013 08:37 PM

I would hope he likes what he sees - he built the ****ing team.

Insert WE LANDED ON THE MOON pic from Dumb and Dumber here.

Dante84 05-21-2013 09:09 PM

I like that he's aware that part if the roster sucks. Not often you hear a GM concede that.

SAUTO 05-21-2013 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 9698869)
I like that he's aware that part if the roster sucks. Not often you hear a GM concede that.

He came from a team with Aaron Rodgers
Posted via Mobile Device

Sannyasi 05-21-2013 09:52 PM

Covitz:Chiefs GM John Dorsey thinks team is a pile of shit

Mother****erJones 05-21-2013 10:13 PM

They're in shorts. Can't judge much. Wait and see obviously

notorious 05-21-2013 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9698635)
blah,blah,blah ... win or **** off.

Quote:

Originally Posted by theelusiveeightrop (Post 9698646)
Winning cures all.

These.


Fluff pieces just make me roll my eyes.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-21-2013 10:33 PM

The time between the draft and camp just sucks sooooo much balls.
Posted via Mobile Device

Prison Bitch 05-21-2013 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9699063)
He came from a team with Aaron Rodgers
Posted via Mobile Device

I bet if you asked him honestly which roster he's take outside of QB, he'd say it would be a toss up.

DaneMcCloud 05-21-2013 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9698723)
I would hope he likes what he sees - he built the ****ing team.

Insert WE LANDED ON THE MOON pic from Dumb and Dumber here.

Yeah, it's like the Jodi Arias quote today: "This is the worst mistake of my life. It's the worst thing I've ever done".

Yeah, no shit. I sure as hell hope so.

bevischief 05-22-2013 06:26 AM

Show me.

Mother****erJones 05-22-2013 06:43 AM

Dorsey:" meh, I'm not really sold on Alex but Andy wanted him."

SAUTO 05-22-2013 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 9699387)
I bet if you asked him honestly which roster he's take outside of QB, he'd say it would be a toss up.

probably. That is why I said what I did
Posted via Mobile Device

ptlyon 05-22-2013 07:12 AM

More happy happy joy joy blow smoke up yer ass writing from the Star

Coogs 05-22-2013 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9698552)
Not a real ringing endorsement there

Beats the heck out of what Weis had to say about Cassel a few years back.

Dayze 05-22-2013 07:38 AM

good lord the Star sucks ass.
Even during the season, the articles are sunshine and rainbows.

BlackHelicopters 05-22-2013 07:40 AM

"Chiefs to wear red uniforms half the time." KC Star

Dayze 05-22-2013 07:41 AM

"Chiefs To Play All Home Games At Arrowhead" / Teicher

Titty Meat 05-22-2013 07:44 AM

Chiefs win by scoring more points than other team - covitz

buddha 05-22-2013 07:49 AM

You guys will find something to bitch about 100 percent of the time. Good lord.

We wouldn't want to actually look forward to the football season, would we?

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-22-2013 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 9699640)
You guys will find something to bitch about 100 percent of the time. Good lord.

We wouldn't want to actually look forward to the football season, would we?

I'm looking forward to the season. The majority of my hate comes from not living in KC, not attending many games, not being in the comfort zone of a whole city that back you when the Chiefs suck, and therefore not giving one **** about tailgating and atmosphere. I need wins and a winning organization that embraces winning philosophies. If I choose to fly colors(and I do), you better produce a product that doesn't make people look at my swag and say "really"?
Posted via Mobile Device

Dayze 05-22-2013 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 9699640)
You guys will find something to bitch about 100 percent of the time. Good lord.

We wouldn't want to actually look forward to the football season, would we?

your words are hurtful

Coogs 05-22-2013 09:17 AM

I actually thought this was a pretty good article. Dorsey sounds like a pretty straight shooter. He had some pretty positive things to say about things he has seen that he likes. That is a breath of fresh air compared to the past regime where every single response seemed to be a canned response.

And he refused to throw anyone under the bus that he thought was not performing up to par... but let it be known that some guys need to step it up at the same time.

Pretty good article IMO. :shrug:

texaschiefsfan 05-22-2013 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 9699640)
You guys will find something to bitch about 100 percent of the time. Good lord.

We wouldn't want to actually look forward to the football season, would we?

60% of the time, it works everytime!

In58men 05-22-2013 09:43 AM

Is anyone else concerned about the offense? I've been hearing that our defense is shutting down our offense. Not sure if the pistol is working for them or what's going. We're not able to get anything going offensively.

How hard do they go in OTA's? I'm my quite sure. Eric Berry was breaking up passes left and right. I also don't know who's throwing these passes. Not panicking just yet, so don't kill me.

wazu 05-22-2013 09:51 AM

Quote:

Dorsey:“I really like what Alex Smith is doing,” Dorsey said. “How far he’s grasped this offense, and I can see the head coach loading him up, because he’s a smart kid, he’s physically talented.”
Yeah, that Alex Smith is a real smart kid. Has some physical talent, too, if you can look past the noodle arm. Potential to develop into a VERY decent player! Like, possibly a Top 20 NFL QB in the right system if surrounded by immense talent at every other position on offense.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-22-2013 09:55 AM

Dilfering.
Posted via Mobile Device

-King- 05-22-2013 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 9699917)
Is anyone else concerned about the offense? I've been hearing that our defense is shutting down our offense. Not sure if the pistol is working for them or what's going. We're not able to get anything going offensively.

How hard do they go in OTA's? I'm my quite sure. Eric Berry was breaking up passes left and right. I also don't know who's throwing these passes. Not panicking just yet, so don't kill me.

Every defense in the league is ahead of their offense at this point. Takes longer to install and properly run an offense than it does a defense.
Posted via Mobile Device

Marcellus 05-22-2013 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 9699640)
You guys will find something to bitch about 100 percent of the time. Good lord.

We wouldn't want to actually look forward to the football season, would we?

This place is a giant vagina that makes Octomom's uterus look virgin.

vailpass 05-22-2013 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9699960)
Every defense in the league is ahead of their offense at this point. Takes longer to install and properly run an offense than it does a defense.
Posted via Mobile Device

True. At least for those teams installing a new offense.

In58men 05-22-2013 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9699960)
Every defense in the league is ahead of their offense at this point. Takes longer to install and properly run an offense than it does a defense.
Posted via Mobile Device

Understandable, I was thinking it would take more time or defense to transition than an offense, especially if we're trying to stop the pistol. The majority of the time, defenses seem to struggle more.

Not a big deal though, I'm sure they'll get together.

bevischief 05-22-2013 10:14 AM

Because we have heard this before...

PhillyChiefFan 05-22-2013 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9698635)
blah,blah,blah ... win or **** off.

/thread.

Mav 05-22-2013 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 9699945)
Yeah, that Alex Smith is a real smart kid. Has some physical talent, too, if you can look past the noodle arm. Potential to develop into a VERY decent player! Like, possibly a Top 20 NFL QB in the right system if surrounded by immense talent at every other position on offense.

Please do tell me about all of this offensive talent that Alex Smith was surrounded with in 2011. I must have missed it. Really, no, do tell.

Especially at receiver......This should be GREAT. his wr depth chart looked like this to start the season.

Crabtree,
Braylon Edwards.
Josh Morgan,
Kyle WIlliams.

By the NFCCG, it was

Crabtree,
Kyle Wlliams,
Brett Swain,
Joe Hastings.

on the IR,

Tedd Ginn,
Josh Morgan,

Cut, braylon Edwards.

Please, do tell me more about this immense talent on offense. Im dying to know.

AlexSmithDynasty 05-22-2013 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9698552)
Not a real ringing endorsement there

You want him to say "OMG I love him, he's the greatest ever!!!!!!" He complimented him about as highly as you ever hear coaches or GM's compliment their players.

AlexSmithDynasty 05-22-2013 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9700235)
Please do tell me about all of this offensive talent that Alex Smith was surrounded with in 2011. I must have missed it. Really, no, do tell.

Especially at receiver......This should be GREAT. his wr depth chart looked like this to start the season.

Crabtree,
Braylon Edwards.
Josh Morgan,
Kyle WIlliams.

By the NFCCG, it was

Crabtree,
Kyle Wlliams,
Brett Swain,
Joe Hastings.

on the IR,

Tedd Ginn,
Josh Morgan,

Cut, braylon Edwards.

Please, do tell me more about this immense talent on offense. Im dying to know.

All you need to know about how bad the receivers were by the end of the year is that Brett Swain and Joe Hastings are both white practice squad receivers and they were starting.

Tribal Warfare 05-22-2013 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexSmithDynasty (Post 9700274)
You want him to say "OMG I love him, he's the greatest ever!!!!!!" He complimented him about as highly as you ever hear coaches or GM's compliment their players.


Bullshit, his response "well Alex is smart! :shrug:" doesn't give me the warm and fuzzies on our key FA pickup

AlexSmithDynasty 05-22-2013 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9700458)
Bullshit, his response "well Alex is smart! :shrug:" doesn't give me the warm and fuzzies on our key FA pickup

But he didn't just say he was smart, he said he was physically gifted and he really liked what he was doing.

Tribal Warfare 05-22-2013 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexSmithDynasty (Post 9700471)
But he didn't just say he was smart, he said he was physically gifted and he really liked what he was doing.

Pioli said same shit about Cassel, it's deja vu all over again.

AlexSmithDynasty 05-22-2013 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9700479)
***** said same shit about Cassel, it's deja vu all over again.

Smith was a number 1 overall pick, Cassel didn't even start in college. There's a huge gap in talent level between the two.

Rasputin 05-22-2013 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexSmithDynasty (Post 9700720)
Smith was a number 1 overall pick, Cassel didn't even start in college. There's a huge gap in talent level between the two.


Hell even Matt Cassel has thrown for more TDs than Alex Smith in a season. That's ****ing embarrassing man.

OnTheWarpath15 05-22-2013 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9700744)
Hell even Matt Cassel has thrown for more TDs than Alex Smith in a season. That's ****ing embarrassing man.

In a season?

Hell, he's thrown for more in his CAREER.

And Cassel has been a starter for two fewer seasons than Smith.

chiefzilla1501 05-22-2013 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 9699973)
Understandable, I was thinking it would take more time or defense to transition than an offense, especially if we're trying to stop the pistol. The majority of the time, defenses seem to struggle more.

Not a big deal though, I'm sure they'll get together.

Nah, usually the other way around. Think about how many things can go wrong if one person botches an assignment, if your QB isn't on the same page as the receiver, if any route is mis-timed, if your line isn't in sync, etc.... Not that defenses don't need that stuff too, but there's so much more of it on offense. Defenses can often improve overnight.

chiefzilla1501 05-22-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9700758)
In a season?

Hell, he's thrown for more in his CAREER.

And Cassel has been a starter for two fewer seasons than Smith.

Regardless of your opinion on Alex Smith (I think he's an average QB), he's a much better QB than Cassel. Period.

Marcellus 05-22-2013 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9700458)
Bullshit, his response "well Alex is smart! :shrug:" doesn't give me the warm and fuzzies on our key FA pickup

Yea you are reaching for something to bitch about. He also made reference to his physical ability and how was impressed with him.

But cherry pick what you want.

Tribal Warfare 05-22-2013 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus the True (Post 9700796)
Yea you are reaching for something to bitch about. He also made reference to his physical ability and how was impressed with him.

But cherry pick what you want.

Shit dude, this is the Cassel rebuttal here

Marcellus 05-22-2013 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9700815)
Shit dude, this is the Cassel rebuttal here

WTF does Cassel have to do with Alex Smith?

Rasputin 05-22-2013 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9700758)
In a season?

Hell, he's thrown for more in his CAREER.

And Cassel has been a starter for two fewer seasons than Smith.



I keep trying tell my self that I'm wrong about Alex Smith and that he is better than I think he is. Then you say that ROFL

OnTheWarpath15 05-22-2013 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9700775)
Regardless of your opinion on Alex Smith (I think he's an average QB), he's a much better QB than Cassel. Period.

Not opinion, fact. And the stats back it up.

Statistically, they are the same ****ing guy. You have no evidence to back up a claim that Smith is "much better" than Cassel.

Alex Smith:

179 yards per game
1.01 TD per game
.77 INT per game
59.3% completion
6.56 yards per attempt
.45 fumbles per game

Matt Cassel:

173 yards per game
1.05 TD per game
.73 INT per game
58.9% completion
6.6 yards per attempt
.31 fumbles per game

If Buffalo had traded for Alex Smith, no one here would be claiming Smith is "much better" than Cassel - and rightfully so, because there's no evidence to back up such a claim.

Marcellus 05-22-2013 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9700758)
In a season?

Hell, he's thrown for more in his CAREER.

And Cassel has been a starter for two fewer seasons than Smith.

Because all things have been equal right?

For a guy who isn't in to stats...............

Tribal Warfare 05-22-2013 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus the True (Post 9700826)
WTF does Cassel have to do with Alex Smith?

They are mirror images of each other only difference is Smith is made of glass.

It's like you can copy and paste the same debate statements from the Cassel defense to here and you wouldn't tell the difference.

Marcellus 05-22-2013 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9700848)
Not opinion, fact. And the stats back it up.

Statistically, they are the same ****ing guy. You have no evidence to back up a claim that Smith is "much better" than Cassel.

Alex Smith:

179 yards per game
1.01 TD per game
.77 INT per game
59.3% completion
6.56 yards per attempt
.45 fumbles per game

Matt Cassel:

173 yards per game
1.05 TD per game
.73 INT per game
58.9% completion
6.6 yards per attempt
.31 fumbles per game

If Buffalo had traded for Alex Smith, no one here would be claiming Smith is "much better" than Cassel - and rightfully so, because there's no evidence to back up such a claim.

So you are a big stat guy?

People here claimed Smith was way better than Cassel before he was traded here, it only changed after. You know this, I know this.

The threads are here.

Marcellus 05-22-2013 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9700856)
They are mirror images of each other only difference is Smith is made of glass.

It's like you can copy and paste the same debate statements from the Cassel defense to here and you wouldn't tell the difference.

So you and OTWP think Cassel could have had the 2011 season Smith did? And the start to the 2012 season?

Marcellus 05-22-2013 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9700856)
They are mirror images of each other only difference is Smith is made of glass.

It's like you can copy and paste the same debate statements from the Cassel defense to here and you wouldn't tell the difference.

Look, not groundbreaking difference here but if we want to look at Smith Vs Cassel 2009 to present here what it looks like. One guy improving another getting worse.

I have not claimed Smith is a world beater but I liked the guy in SF the last few years before he was traded so I am not going to just reverse field now like many here.

http://i541.photobucket.com/albums/g...ps73e280f3.jpg

Rasputin 05-22-2013 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus the False (Post 9700858)
So you are a big stat guy?

People here claimed Smith was way better than Cassel before he was traded here, it only changed after. You know this, I know this.

The threads are here.


Bull shit. There wasn't very many here who wanted Alex Smith and if they were they were being shot down.



I call bull shit on your post.

OnTheWarpath15 05-22-2013 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus the True (Post 9700861)
So you and OTWP think Cassel could have had the 2011 season Smith did? And the start to the 2012 season?

Could?

He already has. 2010.

Smith - 2011/2012:

187 yards per game
1.15 TD per game
.38 INT per game
64% completion
7.36 yards per attempt
.3 fumbles per game

Matt Cassel - 2010

208 yards per game
1.8 TD per game
.46 INT per game
58.2% completion
6.92 yards per attempt
.13 fumbles per game

Tribal Warfare 05-22-2013 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus the True (Post 9700861)
So you and OTWP think Cassel could have had the 2011 season Smith did? And the start to the 2012 season?


As I said the Cassel debate all over again. His level of suck equals Cassel with injury issues.

Marcellus 05-22-2013 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9700891)
Bull shit. There wasn't very many here who wanted Alex Smith and if they were they were being shot down.



I call bull shit on your post.

I am not referring to the off season, I am talking in season for the last 2 years.


Clay had an entire thread dedicated to Alex Smith. You need to do some research.

Marcellus 05-22-2013 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9700896)
Could?

He already has. 2010.

Smith - 2011/2012:

187 yards per game
1.15 TD per game
.38 INT per game
64% completion
7.36 yards per attempt
.3 fumbles per game

Matt Cassel - 2010

208 yards per game
1.8 TD per game
.46 INT per game
58.2% completion
6.92 yards per attempt
.13 fumbles per game

Matt Cassel played well beating Brees in a playoff game and almost won the NFCCG? **** me.

You all are some jaded mother ****ers.

Rasputin 05-22-2013 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus the True (Post 9700900)
I am not referring to the off season, I am talking in season for the last 2 years.


Clay had an entire thread dedicated to Alex Smith. You need to do some research.



I don't have to do any research at all I was here. Last season as soon as Alex Smith was benched a bunch of us went on a neg rep spree to any one who pimped for Alex Smith to come here. Not many at all wanted Alex Smith to come here just a few. Only a handful of posters wanted anything to do with Alex Smith before the trade.

OnTheWarpath15 05-22-2013 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus the True (Post 9700889)
Look, not groundbreaking difference here but if we want to look at Smith Vs Cassel 2009 to present here what it looks like. One guy improving another getting worse.

I have not claimed Smith is a world beater but I liked the guy in SF the last few years before he was traded so I am not going to just reverse field now like many here.

http://i541.photobucket.com/albums/g...ps73e280f3.jpg

The old version of QB rating?

ROFL

Desperate.

Eagles game, 2009. Cassel throws for 90 yards and a 5 yard average in a game we lost by 20 points. QB Rating?

124.5.

Rausch 05-22-2013 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus the True (Post 9700858)

People here claimed Smith was way better than Cassel before he was traded here, it only changed after. You know this, I know this.

The threads are here.

Every starting QB and many b/u's are better than Ca$$hole.

That doesn't make Smith good - it means he's not a horrible failure in every way...

SAUTO 05-22-2013 04:23 PM

I can't see how these guys keep bringing up ONE game out of an eight year career.

say it aloud Marcellus.

That was only one game. Out of eight years
Posted via Mobile Device

OnTheWarpath15 05-22-2013 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus the True (Post 9700902)
Matt Cassel played well beating Brees in a playoff game and almost won the NFCCG? **** me.

You all are some jaded mother ****ers.

One game against what I believe was the 30th ranked pass defense makes up for 7 years of futility?

I understand you want to have hope for the guy, but don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining. Even in his best seasons, he's been average at best. To act as if 1 playoff game against a shit defense makes up for 7 years of sub 200 yard efforts and a 1:1 TD:GAME ratio is ridiculous.

I'm sick of watching shit football, so I hope he's decent, but "decent" isn't good enough. You all are expecting to cash in a lottery ticket. Expecting the frog to magically turn into a prince.

Sad that "Better than Cassel" is the rallying cry.

OnTheWarpath15 05-22-2013 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9700946)
I can't see how these guys keep bringing up ONE game out of an eight year career.

say it aloud Marcellus.

That was only one game. Out of eight years
Posted via Mobile Device

Because that one game is the toothpick holding their weak argument together.

How's my favorite Asian mechanic from Mid-Missouri, BTW?

SAUTO 05-22-2013 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9700962)
Because that one game is the toothpick holding their weak argument together.

How's my favorite Asian mechanic from Mid-Missouri, BTW?

doing great buddy, busy as hell at work. Finally got good help it seems and I can relax and supervise lol.

How about you?
Posted via Mobile Device

OnTheWarpath15 05-22-2013 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9700973)
doing great buddy, busy as hell at work. Finally got good help it seems and I can relax and supervise lol.

How about you?
Posted via Mobile Device

Same here, busy. Last day with kids tomorrow, teacher work day on Friday and then summer break.

SAUTO 05-22-2013 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9700981)
Same here, busy. Last day with kids tomorrow, teacher work day on Friday and then summer break.

you guys get your breaks when I'm blowing up busy lol. Lake weather. I love it.

Have a great summer man.

I'm hoping Smith works, I know you are too lol, but that's all it is.

Really not much else to base it on...
Posted via Mobile Device

Marcellus 05-22-2013 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9700962)
Because that one game is the toothpick holding their weak argument together.

How's my favorite Asian mechanic from Mid-Missouri, BTW?

1 game is all Smith has played well in his career?

I have better shit to do than argue with you guys about this.

Fact is when Flacco put up bad numbers and won games everyone said **** stats he wins games.

Now it's look at Smiths stats he is lucky to win any games.

By your measurements Flacco and Eli Manning should have been done years before winning a SB as try both put up bad numbers and did it in seasons they won the SB in.

Laugh all you want I'm not the one who lacks perspective.

OnTheWarpath15 05-22-2013 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9700983)
you guys get your breaks when I'm blowing up busy lol. Lake weather. I love it.

Have a great summer man.

I'm hoping Smith works, I know you are too lol, but that's all it is.

Really not much else to base it on...
Posted via Mobile Device

I don't get the typical teacher summer vacation.

We're on a modified calendar. I'll be off from this weekend until July 8th, work a 9-week quarter, then have 3 weeks off in September. Work another 9-week quarter, and have a touch over 4 weeks before/after Christmas. 9 more weeks, 3 week Spring Break in late March/early April.

I'm loving it - it's nice to be able take long vacations when it's not peak/expensive.

SAUTO 05-22-2013 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9700995)
I don't get the typical teacher summer vacation.

We're on a modified calendar. I'll be off from this weekend until July 8th, work a 9-week quarter, then have 3 weeks off in September. Work another 9-week quarter, and have a touch over 4 weeks before/after Christmas. 9 more weeks, 3 week Spring Break in late March/early April.

I'm loving it - it's nice to be able take long vacations when it's not peak/expensive.

Oh yeah. I bet that is ****ing awesome.

I've been lining the guys out early the last week and taking off early some, that's my vacation lol
Posted via Mobile Device


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.