ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Teicher:Chiefs like what they’ve seen so far from QB Alex Smith (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=273475)

Tribal Warfare 05-30-2013 04:02 PM

Teicher:Chiefs like what they’ve seen so far from QB Alex Smith
 
Chiefs like what they’ve seen so far from QB Alex Smith
By ADAM TEICHER
The Kansas City Star
The trade for quarterback Alex Smith might take another year or more to adequately assess, but at least from their part, the Chiefs may not feel the need to wait. Quarterbacks coach Matt Nagy came close to calling it a success after practice Thursday.

“He’s been everything that we thought he was,’’ Nagy said of Smith. “He’s a true professional. He’s in his (playbook) every day. He’s always asking questions, trying to get better. He’s being a leader for the other (quarterbacks) as well.’’

Smith, like the other Chiefs quarterbacks, has had his successes and failures on the practice field. He is learning a new offensive system under a new set of coaches and throwing to a new set of receivers.

Smith and his teammates are prohibited under NFL rules from working in pads, so at this time of year, practice is conducted at something less than full speed, and a better quarterback evaluation is generally done at training camp, when teams are allowed to hold padded practice sessions.

Most teams are generally pleased with their quarterbacks at this stage, when there is no defensive pressure for them to worry about. The Chiefs, for instance, were content with Matt Cassel at a similar point after trading for him in 2009. Once the games began, Cassel never developed into the player they thought he could become, and in March he was released.

The Chiefs believe they already have an accurate grasp of what Smith is capable of in a physical regard, having watched on tape all of his games as a starter with the San Francisco 49ers. But none of their key offensive figures, including Nagy, coordinator Doug Pederson or coach Andy Reid, who will call the plays, had any experience with Smith, so they weren’t certain what they would get from their new starting quarterback in terms of preparation and work habits.

That part of Smith’s game has provided them with some relief.

“He’s comfortable with what we’re doing,’’ Pederson said. “He’s understanding the terminology, and he’s orchestrating that at the line of scrimmage. We’re really pleased with where he’s at right now.’’

Those intangibles were the unknown.

“I’m with him every single day,’’ Nagy said. “Just talking X’s and O’s and past experiences he’s had, he brings some good things to our attention as a staff. He has a lot of valuable experience. He’s been through a lot. Having those experiences and coming in here to a team with a new staff, it’s been an awesome experience. Throughout this process, we’re taking in what he has, he’s taking in what we have, and we’re putting it all together and trying to make this work.

“When he’s out here on the practice field, he’s a leader. The guys look to him. The quarterback position is so important to be that leader, whether it’s vocally or by your play. He does both of that. Having him be able to do that and have some of these younger guys look up to him, that’s what we need, and that’s what we expected he’d have and he does have that.’’

In return for Smith, the Chiefs sent their second-round pick in this year’s draft plus a third-rounder next year that converts to a second if they win eight or more games this season. Smith would be worth any price if he becomes the long-term solution at a position that has been most elusive for the Chiefs.

“It’s been great,’’ Smith said of his first few practices with the Chiefs. “It’s been football. I’ve been itching for this for a long time. I was sitting there watching a lot of football at the end of last year. I’ve said this before: This is what I wanted, and now it’s here. I’m just trying to make the most of it.’’

The Chiefs also signed former Missouri quarterback Chase Daniel to be Smith’s backup, even though he’s thrown only nine passes in four seasons behind Drew Brees for New Orleans.

“It’s evident he’s been with such a great quarterback in Drew,’’ Nagy said. “He comes in and he’s very cerebral with the protections. He understands the game and he’s a competitor. He pushed Drew Brees every day in practice, and that’s what he’s going to do here with Alex.’’

Ricky Stanzi and rookie Tyler Bray are the other quarterbacks. Stanzi, who has been with the Chiefs for two seasons without getting into a regular-season game, began the offseason as the third quarterback, a significant fact this time of year only because he will get more snaps in practice.

Bray and Stanzi have since flipped spots, with Bray getting more practice snaps.

“I want to see each guy every day getting better,’’ Nagy said. “If one is a little bit behind the other, I want to see who that is and I want to see if he’s going to improve. Is he getting better? If he’s going backwards, that’s not what we want. Let’s see him improve.

“Let’s not put them against each other right now. Let’s just see where they’re at individually, and if you get better, that’s great. We’ll go from there.’’

Tribal Warfare 05-30-2013 04:03 PM

The collective false hope rhetoric is on full now

In58men 05-30-2013 04:09 PM

Would they say anything different?

BlackHelicopters 05-30-2013 04:10 PM

Pulitzer Prize winning journalism

lcarus 05-30-2013 04:20 PM

Smokescreen for Geno

Chiefs Pantalones 05-30-2013 04:21 PM

Every time I get excited that football is only a couple months away I remember our QB situation and get depressed. It's like dementia or something. I really hope Smith is the answer. But I've seen this movie before and won't expect a different ending until it happens.

ChiefsCountry 05-30-2013 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 9719590)
Every time I get excited that football is only a couple months away I remember our QB situation and get depressed. It's like dementia or something. I really hope Smith is the answer. But I've seen this movie before and won't expect a different ending until it happens.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gzdWPwVTWsI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

RealSNR 05-30-2013 04:24 PM

Quote:

The trade for quarterback Alex Smith might take another year or more to adequately assess,
Now do you ****ing idiots see why trading for him without investing in a high-profile rookie was a terrible idea?

BigMeatballDave 05-30-2013 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9719601)
Now do you ****ing idiots see why trading for him without investing in a high-profile rookie was a terrible idea?

Per the entire NFL, there was no high-profile rookie QB.

BigMeatballDave 05-30-2013 04:38 PM

This team is not worth throwing a tantrum for or getting excited about.

the Talking Can 05-30-2013 04:42 PM

Teicher: QB Shows Up For Practice...Chiefs Declare Trade Success

"We wish we could have traded more..."

chiefzilla1501 05-30-2013 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9719601)
Now do you ****ing idiots see why trading for him without investing in a high-profile rookie was a terrible idea?

It depends. I don't think Smith will take long to assess. He's not the answer. The question is, is Reid's new pistol offense the answer. Because even if Smith is mediocre in a very smart offensive scheme, it gives Reid/Peterson experience running a potentially groundbreaking offense.

Frankly, I'm more intrigued by Chase Daniel. And I'm not a Mizzou fan. The other curious thing about the Pistol is it will be much easier to find a steal of a young QB in upcoming drafts.

007 05-30-2013 04:43 PM

have we ever had a team that came out and said JFC this QB we picked really sucks ass?

el borracho 05-30-2013 04:43 PM

Chase Daniel pushed Drew Brees everyday in practice? hahahahaha!

Gold, Jerry!

mlyonsd 05-30-2013 04:43 PM

Oh good. I was worrying a bit that we'd see Reid come out and say they made a terrible mistake.

BlackHelicopters 05-30-2013 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9719668)
Chase Daniel pushed Drew Brees everyday in practice? hahahahaha!

Gold, Jerry!

LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAO

el borracho 05-30-2013 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9719666)
have we ever had a team that came out and said JFC this QB we picked really sucks ass?

No, but there have been occasions where they should have. Actually, more often than not, lol.

RealSNR 05-30-2013 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9719648)
Per the entire NFL, there was no high-profile rookie QB.

Matt Barkley was sitting right there.

What, is the late 3rd round pick still "TOO RISKEE"

OrtonsPiercedTaint 05-30-2013 04:52 PM

Matt Nagy Matt Nagy

Matt Nagy Matt Nagy Matt Nagy

Matt Nagy Matt Nagy Matt Nagy

Matt Nagy Matt Nagy Matt Nagy

Matt Nagy Matt Nagy Matt Nagy

Matt Nagy

KC native 05-30-2013 04:55 PM

I hate this team and teicher.

Messier 05-30-2013 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9719668)
Chase Daniel pushed Drew Brees everyday in practice? hahahahaha!

Gold, Jerry!

I don't think he meant push as in push for playing time.

Messier 05-30-2013 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9719684)
Matt Barkley was sitting right there.

What, is the late 3rd round pick still "TOO RISKEE"

I guess he's high profile, as in we know his name.

Hammock Parties 05-30-2013 05:04 PM

No mention of deep passing in that article. What a maroon.

MIAdragon 05-30-2013 05:05 PM

"“He’s been everything that we thought he was,’’ Nagy said of Smith. “He’s a true professional. He’s in his (playbook) every day. He’s always asking questions, trying to get better. He’s being a leader for the other (quarterbacks) as well.’’"

****ing Mark Cassel part deux, **** this, I don't want to hear this shit. I want to hear "Holy Shit, the guys flinging it all over the field. Fitting it in windows smaller than a fly ass. Marching the O up and down the field at will."

Great ****ing great the guy has his nose in the play book whoop de ****ing do

Messier 05-30-2013 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 9719706)
I hate this team and teicher.

And yet you read his stuff? Just ignore him and the Chiefs. Maybe you'll feel better.

Deberg_1990 05-30-2013 05:06 PM

How many here would kill for Teichers job? Cut and paste Chiefs fluff pieces and few times a week. Hit submit from your couch. Done before noon. Profit.
Posted via Mobile Device

stonedstooge 05-30-2013 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAdragon (Post 9719737)
"“He’s been everything that we thought he was,’’ Nagy said of Smith. “He’s a true professional. He’s in his (playbook) every day. He’s always asking questions, trying to get better. He’s being a leader for the other (quarterbacks) as well.’’"

****ing Mark Cassel part deux, **** this, I don't want to hear this shit. I want to hear "Holy Shit, the guys flinging it all over the field. Fitting it in windows smaller than a fly ass. Marching the O up and down the field at will."

Great ****ing great the guy has his nose in the play book whoop de ****ing do

This

KC native 05-30-2013 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAdragon (Post 9719737)
"“He’s been everything that we thought he was,’’ Nagy said of Smith. “He’s a true professional. He’s in his (playbook) every day. He’s always asking questions, trying to get better. He’s being a leader for the other (quarterbacks) as well.’’"

****ing Mark Cassel part deux, **** this, I don't want to hear this shit. I want to hear "Holy Shit, the guys flinging it all over the field. Fitting it in windows smaller than a fly ass. Marching the O up and down the field at will."

Great ****ing great the guy has his nose in the play book whoop de ****ing do

This guy gets it.

DaFace 05-30-2013 05:18 PM

Seems like every article from the Star lately has been "Chiefs like what they’ve seen so far from XXX". Kind of getting boring.

RealSNR 05-30-2013 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9719731)
I guess he's high profile, as in we know his name.

Compare Matt Barkley to other 4th round QBs in years past. You're telling me there's no difference between him and those guys?

QBs fell in this draft. But you can't deny the huge change in perception between last year and this year. And yes, that absolutely affects player judgments and evaluations.

In any case, Matt Barkley would have had his ass on the bench for at least a season or two. He might not have worked out, but he's got a better shot at being the QB we need over Tyler freakin Bray. And when you get into the 3rd round and you have the shit that we do for QBs, that draft pick is worth it each and every time.

Yes, Barkley would have been high profile.

Hammock Parties 05-30-2013 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9719743)
How many here would kill for Teichers job? Cut and paste Chiefs fluff pieces and few times a week. Hit submit from your couch. Done before noon. Profit.
Posted via Mobile Device

It's amazing they have kept his job all these years and cut loose guys like Babb and Whitlock.

Dump Teicher and pay a 22-year old out of college to do his job. There would be no discernible difference.

Reaper16 05-30-2013 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Branden Albert's Huge Balls (Post 9719785)
It's amazing they have kept his job all these years and cut loose guys like Babb and Whitlock.

Dump Teicher and pay a 22-year old out of college to do his job. There would be no discernible difference.

Not fair to say Babb was cut loose. Dude took a better job at a better paper.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 05-30-2013 05:34 PM

I'm pretty sure Teicher puts on a wig and mustache and is reporter Michael Mahoney on KC channel 9.

chiefzilla1501 05-30-2013 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 9719787)
Not fair to say Babb was cut loose. Dude took a better job at a better paper.

Also would imagine he was fed up with Pioli and his gestapo tactics

J Diddy 05-30-2013 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9719770)
Seems like every article from the Star lately has been "Chiefs like what they’ve seen so far from XXX". Kind of getting boring.

Funny part is someone said something to that effect when they were talking about the kicking game yesterday. How they have done every position but the quarterback and then today bam.

I hope Teicher doesn't get on here. If he read some of the reviews of his articles he'd probably go on a shooting spree.

chiefzilla1501 05-30-2013 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 9719805)
Funny part is someone said something to that effect when they were talking about the kicking game yesterday. How they have done every position but the quarterback and then today bam.

I hope Teicher doesn't get on here. If he read some of the reviews of his articles he'd probably go on a shooting spree.

I'm sure he's fine. People forget that the majority of his audience isn't CP. It's the majority of Chiefs' fans who are casual watchers or idol worshipers. And much as we hate this bullshit and much as these fans are annoying, they're the people who make Arrowhead loud.

ptlyon 05-31-2013 08:19 AM

So do I buy my season tix now, or...

TEX 05-31-2013 08:53 AM

I'll belive it when I see it. Remember last year Cassel was supposed to be tearing it up in mini camp as well...

Dayze 05-31-2013 08:55 AM

I just wish they'd stop writing articles until TC.

Nothing but fluff pieces until then.

"Chiefs Hopeful To Improve"

buddha 05-31-2013 09:16 AM

There is nothing that the Star can write that the same group of douchebags won't rip to shreds.

Hell...have the negative nancys every imagined that Alex might actually work out well in KC?

It's amazing how all three of the QBs were demeaned in the same thread...and yet, somehow, the GREAT MATT BARKLEY would have made it all better.

ptlyon 05-31-2013 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9721531)
I just wish they'd stop writing articles until TC.

Nothing but fluff pieces until then.

"Chiefs Hopeful To Improve"

And then more fluff. Stanzi was a God in TC.

Chief Roundup 05-31-2013 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9719526)
[B][SIZE="5"]“It’s evident he’s been with such a great quarterback in Drew,’’ Nagy said. “He comes in and he’s very cerebral with the protections. He understands the game and he’s a competitor. He pushed Drew Brees every day in practice, and that’s what he’s going to do here with Alex.’’

Damn if the guy is good enough to push Drew Brees then he should be our starter.

ptlyon 05-31-2013 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 9721555)
There is nothing that the Star can write that the same group of douchebags won't rip to shreds.

Hell...have the negative nancys every imagined that Alex might actually work out well in KC?

It's amazing how all three of the QBs were demeaned in the same thread...and yet, somehow, the GREAT MATT BARKLEY would have made it all better.

Define "well"

ptlyon 05-31-2013 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 9721561)
Define "well"

Someone please insert the judge Smails pic here

Sandy Vagina 05-31-2013 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 9721555)
There is nothing that the Star can write that the same group of douchebags won't rip to shreds.

Hell...have the negative nancys every imagined that Alex might actually work out well in KC?

It's amazing how all three of the QBs were demeaned in the same thread...and yet, somehow, the GREAT MATT BARKLEY would have made it all better.

:thumb:

Quarterbacks in KC have failed under old management, so that means no new QB can succeed with new management. Brilliant! :doh!:

Skull-FU 05-31-2013 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 9721555)
There is nothing that the Star can write that the same group of douchebags won't rip to shreds.

Hell...have the negative nancys every imagined that Alex might actually work out well in KC?

It's amazing how all three of the QBs were demeaned in the same thread...and yet, somehow, the GREAT MATT BARKLEY would have made it all better.

Good post and I agree. We have a new coach, GM, and three new quarterbacks. People should be happy.

Even if the record happens to turn out worse than last year's, we are better off.

el borracho 05-31-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 9721555)
Hell...have the negative nancys every imagined that Alex might actually work out well in KC?

No. If the goal is Super Bowl, then it is unimaginable that Alex Smith will work out well in KC.

jlw62987 05-31-2013 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9721614)
No. If the goal is Super Bowl, then it is unimaginable that Alex Smith will work out well in KC.

That doesn't make any sense. Alex Smith was a fumble away from making the Super Bowl two years ago. He should have started over Kaepernick this year as well. I can't wait until teams figure out Kaepernick and the 49ers collapse from Harbaugh's dumb decision. Smith was a number 1 pick! He had AWFUL coaching and AWFUL teams until Harbaugh came into town. The guy has tremendous talent and will thrive under Reid's coaching.

Let me see here. Trust the CP internet coaches on here or Andy Reid? Hmm....tough one! I think I'll trust Andy Reid over you guys on here any day.

el borracho 05-31-2013 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9721591)
:thumb:

Quarterbacks in KC have failed under old management, so that means no new QB can succeed with new management. Brilliant! :doh!:

Alex Smith is not a new QB; he is an eight year veteran who has been benched multiple times and ultimately replaced by a more dynamic player.

jlw62987 05-31-2013 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9721635)
Alex Smith is not a new QB; he is an eight year veteran who has been benched multiple times and ultimately replaced by a more dynamic player.

And who would that be? Geno Smith? lol...

el borracho 05-31-2013 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skull-FU (Post 9721597)
Good post and I agree. We have a new coach, GM, and three new quarterbacks. People should be happy.

Even if the record happens to turn out worse than last year's, we are better off.

Wrong on all counts. Three different quarterbacks does not necessarily indicate that you have found your franchise quarterback and a worse record than last year would indicate that the team is not better off.

el borracho 05-31-2013 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlw62987 (Post 9721630)
That doesn't make any sense. Alex Smith was a fumble away from making the Super Bowl two years ago. He should have started over Kaepernick this year as well. I can't wait until teams figure out Kaepernick and the 49ers collapse from Harbaugh's dumb decision. Smith was a number 1 pick! He had AWFUL coaching and AWFUL teams until Harbaugh came into town. The guy has tremendous talent and will thrive under Reid's coaching.

Let me see here. Trust the CP internet coaches on here or Andy Reid? Hmm....tough one! I think I'll trust Andy Reid over you guys on here any day.

Alex Smith could be a gold medalist on the Olympic standing there team. It was not Smith's play that led the 49ers to the championship game, as evidenced by the fact that the team went to the championship game (and on to the Super Bowl) without Smith the following year.

SAUTO 05-31-2013 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlw62987 (Post 9721638)
And who would that be? Geno Smith? lol...

No you stupid ****, he was replaced by kapernick.
Posted via Mobile Device

Chief Roundup 05-31-2013 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9721650)
Alex Smith could be a gold medalist on the Olympic standing there team. It was not Smith's play that led the 49ers to the championship game, as evidenced by the fact that the team went to the championship game (and on to the Super Bowl) without Smith the following year.

EASY........you are going to make an argument that you don't have to have that elusive QB to get to and win the SB.

Marcellus 05-31-2013 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlw62987 (Post 9721630)

Let me see here. Trust the CP internet coaches on here or Andy Reid? Hmm....tough one! I think I'll trust Andy Reid over you guys on here any day.

I am fairly tired of the entire Alex Smith debate and we have yet to play a snap in a preseason game.

I will say all coaches at times make mistakes but I am fairly certain Andy Reid knows more about QB's and his offense than the entire CP collective.

Mos of the same people who praised the Andy Reid hire now suddenly know that Reid's hand picked Qb cannot win a SB.

Its laughable.

el borracho 05-31-2013 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlw62987 (Post 9721638)
And who would that be? Geno Smith? lol...

Who would who be? I was referring to Kaepernick in the post you quoted. Kaepernick was the more dynamic QB that ultimately replaced Smith.

Marcellus 05-31-2013 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9721650)
Alex Smith could be a gold medalist on the Olympic standing there team. It was not Smith's play that led the 49ers to the championship game, as evidenced by the fact that the team went to the championship game (and on to the Super Bowl) without Smith the following year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9721668)
Who would who be? I was referring to Kaepernick in the post you quoted. Kaepernick was the more dynamic QB that ultimately replaced Smith.

By that same logic Kaepernick's play had no contribution to the SB team last year. They basically won onne more game with Kap right?

Care to rethink that?

nychief 05-31-2013 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9721650)
Alex Smith could be a gold medalist on the Olympic standing there team. It was not Smith's play that led the 49ers to the championship game, as evidenced by the fact that the team went to the championship game (and on to the Super Bowl) without Smith the following year.

dumb.

el borracho 05-31-2013 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9721662)
EASY........you are going to make an argument that you don't have to have that elusive QB to get to and win the SB.

Well, that is essentially true (although that scenario has a very low percentage of success). If you are trying to be the one team in a decade that wins the Super Bowl without a franchise QB, you really are trying to do things the hard way.

jlw62987 05-31-2013 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9721650)
Alex Smith could be a gold medalist on the Olympic standing there team. It was not Smith's play that led the 49ers to the championship game, as evidenced by the fact that the team went to the championship game (and on to the Super Bowl) without Smith the following year.


You're right. Going 24 for 42, 299 yards, 3 TD's, and 1 rushing TD for a rating of 103.2 against the Saints didn't help at all.

Or going 12 for 26, 196 yards, 2 TD's for a rating of 97.6 caused them to lose against the Giants right?

Give me a break. Tom Brady and the Patriots offense couldn't beat that Giants defense that year in the Super Bowl.

Man, you're right. I don't want a guy who throws 5 TD's with 0 INT's plus a rushing TD in the postseason to lead this team.

Marcellus 05-31-2013 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9721673)
Well, that is essentially true (although that scenario has a very low percentage of success). If you are trying to be the one team in a decade that wins the Super Bowl without a franchise QB, you really are trying to do things the hard way.

Well, that depends on your definition of franchise QB which is a term used way too much. According to CP there are 20+ franchise QB's running around.

SAUTO 05-31-2013 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlw62987 (Post 9721676)
You're right. Going 24 for 42, 299 yards, 3 TD's, and 1 rushing TD for a rating of 103.2 against the Saints didn't help at all.

Or going 12 for 26, 196 yards, 2 TD's for a rating of 97.6 caused them to lose against the Giants right?

Give me a break. Tom Brady and the Patriots offense couldn't beat that Giants defense that year in the Super Bowl.

Man, you're right. I don't want a guy who throws 5 TD's with 0 INT's plus a rushing TD in the postseason to lead this team.

him being terrible on third downs caused the loss to the giants
Posted via Mobile Device

el borracho 05-31-2013 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9721669)
By that same logic Kaepernick's play had no contribution to the SB team last year. They basically won onne more game with Kap right?

Care to rethink that?

No need to rethink anything. That one extra game was pretty important; wouldn't you agree? Two extra games would have been all the difference in the world.

Fat Elvis 05-31-2013 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9719601)
Now do you ****ing idiots see why trading for him without investing in a high-profile rookie was a terrible idea?

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/york-je...093400476.html

Quote:

New York Jets' rookie quarterback Geno Smith finally got down to business on the practice field and started impressing some people Thursday. Playing with the first-team offense against the first-team defense, he started to show some of the abilities that made him one of the most highly discussed prospects prior to the recent NFL draft.

First Team? Bring It On!

As reported by Manish Mehta of NYDailyNews.com and confirmed by Kenneth Arthur of SBNation.com, Smith received first-team reps in Thursday's OTAs. Clearly, coaches Rex Ryan and Marty Mornhinweg were not kidding when they said this would be an open competition right from the get go.

With a new West Coast offense being installed, it would be great for the Jets if they could choose their quarterback as soon as possible, thus giving maximal practice time to the eventual starter. It already appears to be down to two quarterbacks, the rookie Smith and the veteran Mark Sanchez.

With Smith already getting his first-team reps in May, this could be interpreted as a sign that by July or August it will already be his offense.

Cool Under Pressure

As usual, one of the themes at this year's OTAs is the defense outplaying the offense. It is part of being the Jets in the Rex Ryan era. The defense and especially the heavily-loaded defensive line are going to continue to make things challenging for the developing offense.

Nevertheless, Geno Smith handled the pressure quite well. According to Brian Bassett of TheJetsBlog.com, he completed an impressive eight out of nine passes, despite facing pressure and being sacked twice.


The ability to complete passes when hurried is beyond crucial in the modern NFL. With the imbalance between passing and running, especially on third downs, it is necessary for quarterbacks to be able to handle obvious passing situations and opposing blitzes. Sanchez has been criticized in the past for his inability to deal with intense pressure. If Smith continues to handle pressure with ease, that could be a push in his favor.

Leaning the Other Way

Before OTAs, the incumbent Sanchez supposedly had a 'leg up' in the competition. Are things now leaning the other way?

Whenever a rookie quarterback gets first-team reps this early in the year, it is bound to be taken as a sign that he is getting very serious consideration to be the starter. After four years with Sanchez, it is safe to say that some fans have lost patience with his development and would welcome a change.

There are still plenty of wrinkles left to the situation. The wide receiver group will be changing soon. Santonio Holmes is still recovering from last year's foot injury, and Stephen Hill is just now starting to come back from a minor knee injury. The team's new UDFA receiver Marcus Davis should be learning the offense soon and getting more involved. Obviously different receivers can mean different results for the quarterbacks.

To add an extra wrinkle, No. 9 overall pick and cornerback Dee Milliner is getting healthy and should make an appearance relatively soon. The Jets' quarterbacks get the reprieve this year of not having to practice against Darrelle Revis. It will be interesting to see if Milliner is able to affect the situation when he joins in.

For the moment, it is still an open competition, but Geno Smith is starting to impress some people. If he is intimidated, he is not making it obvious.
:popcorn:

Marcellus 05-31-2013 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9721679)
No need to rethink anything. That one extra game was pretty important; wouldn't you agree? Two extra games would have been all the difference in the world.

So there is a huge difference between losing in OT of the NFCCG and losing the SB?

Yea your logic is flawed due to your blinders dude. You just said Smith had no bearing on the team getting to the NFCCG because look they won one more game the next year with Kap. If that is your logic, its awfully hypocritical thinking.


You are correct though Alex Smith could be God and it wouldn't be good enough for half of CP.

Its ****ing hilarious.

Marcellus 05-31-2013 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9721681)

Let the hypocrisy begin.

SAUTO 05-31-2013 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9721689)
Let the hypocrisy begin.

Where?

Are you trying to compare the write ups about a rookie and an eight year vet?
Posted via Mobile Device

jlw62987 05-31-2013 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9721687)
So there is a huge difference between losing in OT of the NFCCG and losing the SB?

Yea your logic is flawed due to your blinders dude. You just said Smith had no bearing on the team getting to the NFCCG because look they won one more game the next year with Kap. If that is your logic, its awfully hypocritical thinking.


You are correct though Alex Smith could be God and it wouldn't be good enough for half of CP.

Its ****ing hilarious.

No, no. You are using too much logic here. You have to have blind hatred or you have no argument here on CP. Truth is, CPers would hate any QB Reid would have drafted or brought in. Some people wanted Geno, others wanted Barkley. It doesn't matter what Reid does until we win a postseason game. Even then, Smith will still be hated here. CPers will say he is a product of the system. They can't fathom that maybe....just maybe our coaching the past 6 years has just been awful and NO QB would have been successful. Even Cassel shined one year under a good offensive coordinator.

Marcellus 05-31-2013 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9721700)
Where?

Are you trying to compare the write ups about a rookie and an eight year vet?
Posted via Mobile Device

Dude give it a rest.

Every fluff piece written on Geno will be taken as proof he is going to be badass, before he takes a snap.

Nothing said about Alex will garner positive response.

Neither guy has taken a snap this season but by the time the season starts their entire future will have been played out here.

Don't act like you dont know this.

-King- 05-31-2013 10:44 AM

Posted via Mobile Device

el borracho 05-31-2013 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9721687)
So there is a huge difference between losing in OT of the NFCCG and losing the SB? Yes, there is.

Yea your logic is flawed due to your blinders dude. You just said Smith had no bearing on the team getting to the NFCCG because look they won one more game the next year with Kap. If that is your logic, its awfully hypocritical thinking. I never said that Smith's play had no bearing.


You are correct though Alex Smith could be God and it wouldn't be good enough for half of CP. Nice hyperbole.
Its ****ing hilarious.

.

NinerDoug 05-31-2013 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9721669)
By that same logic Kaepernick's play had no contribution to the SB team last year. They basically won onne more game with Kap right?

Care to rethink that?

Anyone who saw the divisional playoff game with the Saints in 2011 knows that Alex contributed big time to getting to the NFC Championship game. He was clutch in the 4th quarter. The Catch III.

Last season, he was getting the job done, and would not have been benched but for the concussion. Once CK came in, it was obvious that he was ready to do what he was drafted to do, and is destined to be elite. Far superior to Alex.

Still, with a decent team around him, he can get the job done. Having a phenominal TE like Vernon Davis is pretty much the key.

If you need a QB that will carry the offense, however, not gonna happen.

P.S., you need a good game on the ground as well.

SAUTO 05-31-2013 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9721705)
Dude give it a rest.

Every fluff piece written on Geno will be taken as proof he is going to be badass, before he takes a snap.

Nothing said about Alex will garner positive response.

Neither guy has taken a snap this season but by the time the season starts their entire future will have been played out here.

Don't act like you dont know this.

it is somewhat impressive with a rookie going against a Ryan d.

He's a ****ing rookie. .

Smith is an eight year vet.




Big difference
Posted via Mobile Device

Mav 05-31-2013 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9719774)
Compare Matt Barkley to other 4th round QBs in years past. You're telling me there's no difference between him and those guys?

QBs fell in this draft. But you can't deny the huge change in perception between last year and this year. And yes, that absolutely affects player judgments and evaluations.

In any case, Matt Barkley would have had his ass on the bench for at least a season or two. He might not have worked out, but he's got a better shot at being the QB we need over Tyler freakin Bray. And when you get into the 3rd round and you have the shit that we do for QBs, that draft pick is worth it each and every time.

Yes, Barkley would have been high profile.

Matt Barkley, no matter how many ways people want to spin it, is affected by two things. One, unfair, or not, USC qbs are now judged differently. Second, hes no more physically imposing than Alex Smith, and apparently no less fragile as he has already had a shoulder injury in college. Matt Barkley is not a better qb prospect than Tyler Bray. Nothing about Tyler Brays physical football skills led to him being undrafted. His brain, and common sense were the reasons.
Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 9721555)
There is nothing that the Star can write that the same group of douchebags won't rip to shreds.

Hell...have the negative nancys every imagined that Alex might actually work out well in KC?

It's amazing how all three of the QBs were demeaned in the same thread...and yet, somehow, the GREAT MATT BARKLEY would have made it all better.

Its really not even worth your time to even bother. As soon as I saw the thread title, I knew exactly what was going to be said. No sense in even acknowledging it. No matter what happens in preseason isn't going to make a difference. Winning week one against Jax isn't going to make a difference. The only thing that will make a difference is if the Chiefs make the playoffs. And even then, the hard core dumbasses, will find every other excuse in the book, schedule, chiefs defense, chiefs special teams, chiefs running game, Bowe having 500 yards after catch, alex not taking risks, blah blah blah, the excuses will live on eternally. Why? Because some people are such miserable ****ing human beings and get stuck in the suck so hard that they cant find any silver lining in anything.....its just the way shitty people are.
Quote:

Originally Posted by jlw62987 (Post 9721630)
That doesn't make any sense. Alex Smith was a fumble away from making the Super Bowl two years ago. He should have started over Kaepernick this year as well. I can't wait until teams figure out Kaepernick and the 49ers collapse from Harbaugh's dumb decision. Smith was a number 1 pick! He had AWFUL coaching and AWFUL teams until Harbaugh came into town. The guy has tremendous talent and will thrive under Reid's coaching.

Let me see here. Trust the CP internet coaches on here or Andy Reid? Hmm....tough one! I think I'll trust Andy Reid over you guys on here any day.

See my comment above. Let the malcontents be malcontented. Gonna make for a shitty long season for them.
Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9721668)
Who would who be? I was referring to Kaepernick in the post you quoted. Kaepernick was the more dynamic QB that ultimately replaced Smith.

Yes, Jim Harbaughs hand picked qb replaced his hand picked place holder. Stunning. Never seen that before in the NFL. Like when Brady Replaced Bledsoe, or when Rodgers, replaced Favre, or when Luck Replaced Manning. never seen it, except, the rule maintains. When your back up qb, is your new leaderships hand picked successor, your starter is on a short leash. Its the golden rule......
Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9721678)
him being terrible on third downs caused the loss to the giants
Posted via Mobile Device

Bullshit. Convenient excuse by the ABAers to find anyway possible to pin the loss on one player. He played a part in the loss, no doubt, but his 3rd down conversions were lower on the list than turnovers, and missed opportunities that the 49ers defense didn't capitalize on......teams that lose the turn over battle, lose 70 % of the time.......
Quote:

Originally Posted by NinerDoug (Post 9721737)
Anyone who saw the divisional playoff game with the Saints in 2011 knows that Alex contributed big time to getting to the NFC Championship game. He was clutch in the 4th quarter. The Catch III.

Last season, he was getting the job done, and would not have been benched but for the concussion. Once CK came in, it was obvious that he was ready to do what he was drafted to do, and is destined to be elite. Far superior to Alex.

Still, with a decent team around him, he can get the job done. Having a phenominal TE like Vernon Davis is pretty much the key.

If you need a QB that will carry the offense, however, not gonna happen.

P.S., you need a good game on the ground as well.

Pretty accurate post. You might want to let the guy start a full season before you crown him. Just remember Cam Newton, and now he (keep) lost his security blanket..........

RealSNR 05-31-2013 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9721681)

I don't give a shit what any offense looks like in OTAs. Vermeil's offenses were terrible in OTAs and training camp every offseason, and that's even with the carryover of the same playbook, coaches, and QB.

It's the fact that yes, this team will most likely pull a 6-10, 7-9, or 8-8 season, and just as it was with Cassel, it will be argued that most of the losses were not Alex Smith's fault, and that he needs more time to be evaluated before finding a different solution.

Mav 05-31-2013 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9721859)
it is somewhat impressive with a rookie going against a Ryan d.

He's a ****ing rookie. .

Smith is an eight year vet.




Big difference
Posted via Mobile Device

Not particularly. I prefer to wait until they have the live bullets flying, even in preseason. Nothing impresses me during non padded, no contact practices.

Chief Roundup 05-31-2013 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9721718)
.

Where does the 2 special teams turnovers come into play?
Yes I know Smith could of done something to keep a drive alive as well. But he didn't make the mistake. He doesn't count for 2 turnovers costing 2 possessions.
What if's are just that and not worth a crap but to act like that loss was his fault is not fair at all.

Mav 05-31-2013 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9721877)
I don't give a shit what any offense looks like in OTAs. Vermeil's offenses were terrible in OTAs and training camp every offseason, and that's even with the carryover of the same playbook, coaches, and QB.

It's the fact that yes, this team will most likely pull a 6-10, 7-9, or 8-8 season, and just as it was with Cassel, it will be argued that most of the losses were not Alex Smith's fault, and that he needs more time to be evaluated before finding a different solution.

I concur on the OTA's. Its a half speed thing just to familiarize everyone with the plays. nothing more nothing less. Its just a simple, slightly faster walk through. Nothing to get exicted about.

And, as long as Alex Smith doesn't turn the ball over, you guys are going to win games. The rest of the team is talented, and the schedule on paper is kind of soft.

Marcellus 05-31-2013 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9721859)
it is somewhat impressive with a rookie going against a Ryan d.

He's a ****ing rookie. .

Smith is an eight year vet.




Big difference
Posted via Mobile Device

LMAO Ok whatever.

Marcellus 05-31-2013 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9721877)
I don't give a shit what any offense looks like in OTAs. Vermeil's offenses were terrible in OTAs and training camp every offseason, and that's even with the carryover of the same playbook, coaches, and QB.

It's the fact that yes, this team will most likely pull a 6-10, 7-9, or 8-8 season, and just as it was with Cassel, it will be argued that most of the losses were not Alex Smith's fault, and that he needs more time to be evaluated before finding a different solution.

You got it all figured out dude, I wouldn't bother watching the team or following them the rest of the season, you know how its going to go down already and what everyone is going to say.

Work on your golf game and then go deer hunting or something.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.