ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports What is the worst rule in all of sports, in your opinion? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=273486)

Buck 05-30-2013 10:15 PM

What is the worst rule in all of sports, in your opinion?
 
Let's hear em?

I'll post mine in my next post as to not sway this thread one way or another in the OP.

Buck 05-30-2013 10:17 PM

Defensive Pass Interference is getting there, but for me it's the DH.

I can't stand it, I know it makes for more exciting baseball, but I feel like baseball should be, you want to bat, you need to field a position.

lewdog 05-30-2013 10:17 PM

That NFL games actually have to be played in Qualcomm Stadium a minimum of 8 times a year.

Buck 05-30-2013 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 9720812)
That NFL games actually have to be played in Qualcomm Stadium a minimum of 8 times a year.

Why are you wasting your time trying burning a Chargers fan or the Chargers?

I already know we're irrelevant and that we suck balls.

lewdog 05-30-2013 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 9720814)
Why are you wasting your time trying burning a Chargers fan or the Chargers?

I already know we're irrelevant and that we suck balls.

Just participating in the thread. It is a really ****ing shitty rule, bro.

In58men 05-30-2013 10:20 PM

Still bummed about the lowering the head rule.

Psyko Tek 05-30-2013 10:21 PM

I think Baseball needs a MLB to rush the pitcher
maybe the shortstop can pass block
what do you think?
it would make baseball fun

chiefzilla1501 05-30-2013 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 9720811)
Defensive Pass Interference is getting there, but for me it's the DH.

I can't stand it, I know it makes for more exciting baseball, but I feel like baseball should be, you want to bat, you need to field a position.

Seriously? I hate the rule that pitchers have to hit. Sorry, but I don't want to watch innings end with a catcher getting walked to get to a pitcher. Or a final inning where you have to pull from the bottom of your bench to grab a pinch hitter. It's like forcing your kicker to play receiver.

'Hamas' Jenkins 05-30-2013 10:22 PM

The DH is a horrific rule. It gives the AL a massive advantage.

Ceej 05-30-2013 10:23 PM

The entire BCS.

Buck 05-30-2013 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9720833)
The DH is a horrific rule. It gives the AL a massive advantage.

But watching the pitcher hit is too boring.

'Hamas' Jenkins 05-30-2013 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9720826)
Seriously? I hate the rule that pitchers have to hit. Sorry, but I don't want to watch innings end with a catcher getting walked to get to a pitcher. Or a final inning where you have to pull from the bottom of your bench to grab a pinch hitter. It's like forcing your kicker to play receiver.

God forbid that baseball players be required to actually field a position, run the bases, throw a ball, and hit.

Oz_Chief 05-30-2013 10:23 PM

Right now the ice hockey delay of game penalty. If a player sends the puck directly off of the ice it is 2 minutes. It has been called many times. I have yet to see it be the correct call.

notorious 05-30-2013 10:24 PM

Outside the tackles.


I don't hate the rule, I hate the way they call it.


Defensive holding. It's a bailout call.

wazu 05-30-2013 10:24 PM

The DH. Just goes against the spirit of the game. There might be screwier rules out there for other sports, but none are as far-reaching and game-changing.

Buck 05-30-2013 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9720842)
Outside the tackles.


I don't hate the rule, I hate the way they call it.


Defensive holding. It's a bailout call.

I think it would be a lot better if contact was completely legal (barring headshots or whatever) within 10 yards of the LOS.

MVChiefFan 05-30-2013 10:27 PM

Here's something that's been bothering me lately. When a baserunner steals a base but because the catcher doesn't attempt a throw then it's indifference and not a stolen base. Just give the guy a stolen base for crying out loud! It's not like it matters!

'Hamas' Jenkins 05-30-2013 10:27 PM

Only idiots walk the 8th hitter to get to the pitcher, BTW. Rolling the lineup over is a moronic tactical decision.

Jewish Rabbi 05-30-2013 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9720826)
Seriously? I hate the rule that pitchers have to hit. Sorry, but I don't want to watch innings end with a catcher getting walked to get to a pitcher. Or a final inning where you have to pull from the bottom of your bench to grab a pinch hitter. It's like forcing your kicker to play receiver.

It's called strategy.

ChiefsCountry 05-30-2013 10:27 PM

Over the back call in basketball.

DH is one of my favorites.

notorious 05-30-2013 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 9720850)
I think it would be a lot better if contact was completely legal (barring headshots or whatever) within 10 yards of the LOS.

Basically go back to the "Pre-Manning bitching about the Pats D-Backs" era.

Jewish Rabbi 05-30-2013 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MVChiefFan (Post 9720855)
Here's something that's been bothering me lately. When a baserunner steals a base but because the catcher doesn't attempt a throw then it's indifference and not a stolen base. Just give the guy a stolen base for crying out loud! It's not like it matters!

The only time indifference is called, it is the correct call.

WhawhaWhat 05-30-2013 10:33 PM

No more chairshots to the head in WWE. Seriously weak rule.

chiefsfan987 05-30-2013 10:34 PM

The dumbest rule in baseball is without a doubt being able to run to first on a strikeout if the catcher doesn't catch the ball. I mean seriously. That rule still boggles the mind.

Just Passin' By 05-30-2013 10:35 PM

DH in baseball
Instigator penalty in hockey
Defenseless receiver rule, and the new overtime rules, in football
Almost every new rule or adjusted rule in the NBA post-80's era

I could probably think of some others that are right up there at the top of the suck pile.

wazu 05-30-2013 10:36 PM

If the tuck rule wasn't so rare it would be high on the list.

'Hamas' Jenkins 05-30-2013 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsfan987 (Post 9720875)
The dumbest rule in baseball is without a doubt being able to run to first on a strikeout if the catcher doesn't catch the ball. I mean seriously. That rule still boggles the mind.

I don't mind that rule, although I almost had a stroke when Carpenter struck out a Philly in the bottom of the 8th in Game 5 of the LDS and he reached first. I was sure that **** was going to score and tie the game.

chiefzilla1501 05-30-2013 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 9720858)
It's called strategy.

That's just a made-up word baseball fans use to explain a phenomena that should never happen.

I'm sorry, but when you recruit a basketball center, you factor in how they will defend vs. score vs. rebound, etc.... When you recruit a pitcher, their ability to hit is 0% of what they are asked to do, nor should it ever be more than 0%. It is the one position in all of sports where you ask a player to do something entirely outside of what they are recruited to do. It is like asking a kicker to play linebacker or a goalie to play offense.

The result is that you have complete doofuses sitting in the batter's box and the best you can do is to teach them to bunt. You might as well just throw the at bat away.

BigMeatballDave 05-30-2013 10:39 PM

Possession arrow in college basketball.

Seriously? Is it that ****ing difficult to do a jump ball?

chiefzilla1501 05-30-2013 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9720887)
Possession arrow in college basketball.

Seriously? Is it that ****ing difficult to do a jump ball?

That I will agree with.

I also hate sudden death NFL overtime and can't wait for playoff overtime rules to become regular season rules. It drives me nuts that one team can lose a game so often without ever once holding the ball on offense.

hometeam 05-30-2013 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9720886)
That's just a made-up word baseball fans use to explain a phenomena that should never happen.

I'm sorry, but when you recruit a basketball center, you factor in how they will defend vs. score vs. rebound, etc.... When you recruit a pitcher, their ability to hit is 0% of what they are asked to do, nor should it ever be more than 0%. It is the one position in all of sports where you ask a player to do something entirely outside of what they are recruited to do. It is like asking a kicker to play linebacker or a goalie to play offense.

The result is that you have complete doofuses sitting in the batter's box and the best you can do is to teach them to bunt. You might as well just throw the at bat away.

Kicker plays return team~

Buck 05-30-2013 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9720891)
That I will agree with.

I also hate sudden death NFL overtime and can't wait for playoff overtime rules to become regular season rules. It drives me nuts that one team can lose a game so often without ever once holding the ball on offense.

Is that scheduled to happen or is it still Playoffs only for now?

Edit: wait, isn't that already how it is?

BigMeatballDave 05-30-2013 10:42 PM

Most people who dislike the DH are NL fans.

Buck 05-30-2013 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9720897)
Most people who dislike the DH are NL fans.

Most people who like the DH are AL fans.

Titty Meat 05-30-2013 10:44 PM

Most of baseballs

Phobia 05-30-2013 10:44 PM

I hate knee-downs in football. I think they should be required to advance the ball and if they don't make positive yardage, the clock run-down doesn't start for that play. I want to see 60 minutes of football, not 57. I guess I'm okay if the team on offense is up by 2 touchdowns but if we're talking about a 21-18 game, nobody should be kneeling. Play the game.

chiefzilla1501 05-30-2013 10:45 PM

Another rule I despise is college rules for the restricted area under the basket.

To get called for the charge, you should be at least in the way of the basket, not standing underneath it

Buck 05-30-2013 10:45 PM

Also lowering the mound was dumb.

chiefzilla1501 05-30-2013 10:47 PM

Let's face it. The dumbest rule of any sport (don't know why it just came to me) is the stupid-ass soccer rule to not have a clock for stoppage time.

How ****ing hard is it to show you exactly how much time is left in a game.

'Hamas' Jenkins 05-30-2013 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9720886)
That's just a made-up word baseball fans use to explain a phenomena that should never happen.

I'm sorry, but when you recruit a basketball center, you factor in how they will defend vs. score vs. rebound, etc.... When you recruit a pitcher, their ability to hit is 0% of what they are asked to do, nor should it ever be more than 0%. It is the one position in all of sports where you ask a player to do something entirely outside of what they are recruited to do. It is like asking a kicker to play linebacker or a goalie to play offense.

The result is that you have complete doofuses sitting in the batter's box and the best you can do is to teach them to bunt. You might as well just throw the at bat away.

Funny, I was under the impression that you recruited baseball players. Some of those players just happen to be better at pitching than hitting. Dave Winfield was a converted pitcher. Jason Motte was a converted catcher. Mariano Rivera and K-Rod were shortstops.

Why don't you ask the 2006 Detroit Tigers how important fielding their position is to pitchers? If Kyle Lohse doesn't get a bunt down in the 10th inning of Game 6, the Cardinals don't eventually win that game and the World Series.

Paying some beer swilling **** like Jim Thome to sit in the video room for 3.5 hours a night and then look at 20 pitches while at bat four times is a hell of a sight farther away from "baseball" than a hitting pitcher.

griZZly64 05-30-2013 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 9720879)
If the tuck rule wasn't so rare it would be high on the list.

the tuck rule is no more

ClevelandBronco 05-30-2013 10:52 PM

I don't like the instigator rule in the NHL, but pass interference that can be marked as a 40 yard penalty is just ridiculous. Roughing the passer is getting a bit out of hand as well.

AussieChiefsFan 05-30-2013 10:54 PM

The new rule about head lowering should be annoying.

Just Passin' By 05-30-2013 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 9720942)
I don't like the instigator rule in the NHL, but pass interference that can be marked as a 40 yard penalty is just ridiculous. Roughing the passer is getting a bit out of hand as well.

I've never understood the hostility towards the NFL pass interference rule. It makes sense that you'd be penalized with a spot foul on that. The college version is asinine.

chiefsfan987 05-30-2013 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9720920)
Let's face it. The dumbest rule of any sport (don't know why it just came to me) is the stupid-ass soccer rule to not have a clock for stoppage time.

How ****ing hard is it to show you exactly how much time is left in a game.

Yeah, that one is up there. Good call.

wazu 05-30-2013 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9720920)
Let's face it. The dumbest rule of any sport (don't know why it just came to me) is the stupid-ass soccer rule to not have a clock for stoppage time.

How ****ing hard is it to show you exactly how much time is left in a game.

That is unbelievably stupid. But soccer as a sport is still kinda borderline. Getting there, but borderline.

WhawhaWhat 05-30-2013 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9720927)
Funny, I was under the impression that you recruited baseball players. Some of those players just happen to be better at pitching than hitting. Dave Winfield was a converted pitcher. Jason Motte was a converted catcher. Mariano Rivera and K-Rod were shortstops.

Why don't you ask the 2006 Detroit Tigers how important fielding their position is to pitchers? If Kyle Lohse doesn't get a bunt down in the 10th inning of Game 6, the Cardinals don't eventually win that game and the World Series.

Paying some beer swilling **** like Jim Thome to sit in the video room for 3.5 hours a night and then look at 20 pitches while at bat four times is a hell of a sight farther away from "baseball" than a hitting pitcher.

Pitchers hitting is the same as kickers tackling. I couldn't care less if I ever see it attempted by either again.

chiefzilla1501 05-30-2013 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9720927)
Funny, I was under the impression that you recruited baseball players. Some of those players just happen to be better at pitching than hitting. Dave Winfield was a converted pitcher. Jason Motte was a converted catcher. Mariano Rivera and K-Rod were shortstops.

Why don't you ask the 2006 Detroit Tigers how important fielding their position is to pitchers? If Kyle Lohse doesn't get a bunt down in the 10th inning of Game 6, the Cardinals don't eventually win that game and the World Series.

Paying some beer swilling **** like Jim Thome to sit in the video room for 3.5 hours a night and then look at 20 pitches while at bat four times is a hell of a sight farther away from "baseball" than a hitting pitcher.

The only reason a pitcher enters a game in the majors is to pitch. Period. If they can hit or field, that's a cherry on top. But no pitcher has lost his job because he couldn't hit or field. Which means that until the end of time, pitchers hitting is going to be a complete crapshoot. And sorry, I don't take joy in watching a pitcher hit .100.

Name another position in any sport where a player is asked to do something so instrumental in a part of the game that had 0% bearing on why he was brought on to play.

I would rather watch Jim Thome square off against a #1 pitcher than watch a grown man flail at a pitch like a little girl.

BigMeatballDave 05-30-2013 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 9720901)
Most people who like the DH are AL fans.

Most AL fans I know could go either way on it.

Most NL fans are bleeding vaginas.

:)

WhawhaWhat 05-30-2013 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9720968)
Most AL fans I know could go either way on it.

Most NL fans are bleeding vaginas.

:)

:LOL:

chiefzilla1501 05-30-2013 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 9720946)
I've never understood the hostility towards the NFL pass interference rule. It makes sense that you'd be penalized with a spot foul on that. The college version is asinine.

Because you are basically giving the other team the entire field for a catch that may not have been caught anyway.

In the NBA, you get free throws, which means you still have to earn your way to 2 or 3 points if you don't make the shot. In the NFL, you don't have to earn your way to those 40 yards. It might be a little different if holding rules weren't so damn strict. It would also be easier to take, except that really difficult catches with interference get 40 yards too.

007 05-30-2013 11:28 PM

I have never liked the spot foul for pass interference but I also hate that CBs are called for such bogus penalties anymore.

CrazyPhuD 05-30-2013 11:33 PM

Ties in any sport. You win or you lose. If some team can't manage to win in OT then both teams deserve to lose.

Discuss Thrower 05-30-2013 11:36 PM

The Possession arrow in any basketball contest above the 5th grade level.

Defensive pass interference as a spot foul.

Offensive holding that is 100% subjective to referee interpretation.

NFHS/NCAA rules prohibiting a "down" lineman reporting as eligible.

The prohibition against using instant replay in top level soccer to determine penalties or goals.

Backwards Masking 05-30-2013 11:57 PM

Roughing The Passer, because it's called differently for every QB depending on what team they play for, their salary, public perception, likability and (most disturbing) their marketing power.

What's roughing the passer for Pey Pey is not what's roughing the passer for any random Chiefs or Browns QB. Pey Pey gets a hand graze on the shoulder pad the same instant the ball leaves his hand it's 15 yards and automatic first. Random Chiefs or Browns QB can get hit 3 seconds after the play helmet to helmet and have to leave for a series and it's a great defensive play.

Alright I'm exaggerating a bit but I'm not that far off either.

tooge 05-31-2013 12:17 AM

PI should be a 10 yard penalty.

Psyko Tek 05-31-2013 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9720838)
God forbid that baseball players

FYP
sorry in troll mode tonight
listened to my bosses son tell me how great the Dbags are when I have less ****s to give about baseball than the wnba

Just Passin' By 05-31-2013 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 9721081)
PI should be a 10 yard penalty.

That would then be the worst rule in all of sports, so it would win this thread.

RunKC 05-31-2013 12:22 AM

The rules that protect QB's in the pocket. It's ridiculous. They've taken the fear out of pass rushers destroying a QB.

007 05-31-2013 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 9721081)
PI should be a 10 yard penalty.

15 max

cosmo20002 05-31-2013 12:35 AM

The one where if a team takes a lead top of an inning, and the game is called because of rain, and the teams aren't scheduled to play again this season, the score reverts to the previous full inning where a team held a lead, thereby possibly giving a win to the team that is losing at the time the game is called.

(see tonight's currently delayed Royals-Cardinals game where KC is leading in the 9th 4-2 with bases loaded and no outs, but could lose the game if it is called.)

007 05-31-2013 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 9721104)
The one where if a team takes a lead top of an inning, and the game is called because of rain, and the teams aren't scheduled to play again this season, the score reverts to the previous full inning where a team held a lead, thereby possibly giving a win to the team that is losing at the time the game is called.

(see tonight's currently delayed Royals-Cardinals game where KC is leading in the 9th 4-2 with bases loaded and no outs, but could lose the game if it is called.)

HOLY CRAP They do that? WTF?:spock:

'Hamas' Jenkins 05-31-2013 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 9721104)
The one where if a team takes a lead top of an inning, and the game is called because of rain, and the teams aren't scheduled to play again this season, the score reverts to the previous full inning where a team held a lead, thereby possibly giving a win to the team that is losing at the time the game is called.

(see tonight's currently delayed Royals-Cardinals game where KC is leading in the 9th 4-2 with bases loaded and no outs, but could lose the game if it is called.)

They changed the rule. Worst case scenario: the game is suspended and completed at a later date w/ the Royals up and the bases loaded.

'Hamas' Jenkins 05-31-2013 12:44 AM

And PI should have two tiers. Incidental PI should be a 10 yard penalty or spot foul, whichever is shorter. Egregious PI should be a spot foul. It's clear that the refs need something between illegal contact and spot fouls

cosmo20002 05-31-2013 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9721119)
They changed the rule. Worst case scenario: the game is suspended and completed at a later date w/ the Royals up and the bases loaded.

No, they have explained it several times on the game updates tonight. What I described is accurate.

Just Passin' By 05-31-2013 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 9721116)
I don't know about worst rule, but I've got one that's pretty ****ing bad.

The Detroit Lions game this past Thanksgiving versus Houston. Texans RB runs up the middle, gets tackled, knee obviously touches, refs miss it. He runs 70 yards and is awarded the TD. Schwartz immediately throws challenge flag. Can't challenge a scoring play because they're automatically reviewed.

Rather than doing the logical thing of still reviewing the play and then penalizing the Lions for the illegal flag, there is some dumbass rule that keeps the refs from reviewing the play if the challenge flag is thrown when it shouldn't have been. Therefore, they just let Houston keep the touchdown. All integrity of the game went out the window on that one.

They've changed the rule. There will now be a review in that situation.

007 05-31-2013 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 9721116)
I don't know about worst rule, but I've got one that's pretty ****ing bad.

The Detroit Lions game this past Thanksgiving versus Houston. Texans RB runs up the middle, gets tackled, knee obviously touches, refs miss it. He runs 70 yards and is awarded the TD. Schwartz immediately throws challenge flag. Can't challenge a scoring play because they're automatically reviewed.

Rather than doing the logical thing of still reviewing the play and then penalizing the Lions for the illegal flag, there is some dumbass rule that keeps the refs from reviewing the play if the challenge flag is thrown when it shouldn't have been. Therefore, they just let Houston keep the touchdown. All integrity of the game went out the window on that one.

They should review that. I always felt that the rule of all scoring plays are reviewed are just to verify they crossed the plain. Not something that happened 70 yards earlier.

chiefzilla1501 05-31-2013 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking (Post 9721049)
Roughing The Passer, because it's called differently for every QB depending on what team they play for, their salary, public perception, likability and (most disturbing) their marketing power.

What's roughing the passer for Pey Pey is not what's roughing the passer for any random Chiefs or Browns QB. Pey Pey gets a hand graze on the shoulder pad the same instant the ball leaves his hand it's 15 yards and automatic first. Random Chiefs or Browns QB can get hit 3 seconds after the play helmet to helmet and have to leave for a series and it's a great defensive play.

Alright I'm exaggerating a bit but I'm not that far off either.

I disagree.

The shady bounty shit in New Orleans is exactly why QB protections are in place. The Saints cheated by taking cheap shots at QBs. They succeeded in knocking Kurt Warner and Brett Favre out of critical playoff games. Quite possible they won the Minnesota game by cheating, because Favre didn't return for the critical last series of the game.

It's the Tonya Harding effect. QBs are critical to a game, and the last thing you want is for a team to be incentivized to cheat by taking cheap shots that knock a QB out of a game. Most defensive players will take a fine and a 15 yard penalty if it means knocking a QB out of a game.

Sorter 05-31-2013 12:57 AM

No knees to the head of a grounded opponent is by far the one I detest the most.

I understand not allowing stomps/soccer kicks within a cage for obvious reasons, but knees to the head need to come back.

SPchief 05-31-2013 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9721119)
They changed the rule. Worst case scenario: the game is suspended and completed at a later date w/ the Royals up and the bases loaded.

Wrong

BigMeatballDave 05-31-2013 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 9721081)
PI should be a 10 yard penalty.

I like the 15-yard college rule.

Speaking of college, I hate their 1 foot inbounds for receptions.

mnchiefsguy 05-31-2013 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9721119)
They changed the rule. Worst case scenario: the game is suspended and completed at a later date w/ the Royals up and the bases loaded.

No...because it is the last time that the Royals and Cards are playing this year, it can be called, and the Royals would lose.

BigMeatballDave 05-31-2013 01:49 AM

I hate that offensive holding is a 10-yard penalty.

Just negating the play is good enough.

notorious 05-31-2013 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9721212)
I hate that offensive holding is a 10-yard penalty.

Just negating the play is good enough.

I would like to see the failure rate for drives when holding is called.


If I were a conspiracy nut, this call would be what I would concentrate on. It can be called any time and it's absolutely devastating.

listopencil 05-31-2013 02:15 AM

Offside in pro hockey.

baitism 05-31-2013 02:20 AM

DH is terrible strictly from a throwing at batters standpoint. That shit doesn't happen in the NL where you have to step into the box as well.

mdchiefsfan 05-31-2013 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9720833)
The DH is a horrific rule. It gives the AL a massive advantage.

I don't think it gives the AL any kind of advantage. I would go so far as to say that the NL is the one who has an advantage.

In interleague play the NL pitchers wither get the status quo and bat like usual or they send a backup to the plate as a DH.

AL pitchers aren't used to hitting at all. So when interleague play comes around they are out of their element and a team that is used to having a DH spot is now leaning on a pitcher.

I guess what I am saying is it is much easier for a man on your bench to come in and bat than it is for you pitcher to quickly adapt to batting/bunting and pitching when he isn't used to it.

griZZly64 05-31-2013 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 9721283)
I don't think it gives the AL any kind of advantage. I would go so far as to say that the NL is the one who has an advantage.

In interleague play the NL pitchers wither get the status quo and bat like usual or they send a backup to the plate as a DH.

AL pitchers aren't used to hitting at all. So when interleague play comes around they are out of their element and a team that is used to having a DH spot is now leaning on a pitcher.

I guess what I am saying is it is much easier for a man on your bench to come in and bat than it is for you pitcher to quickly adapt to batting/bunting and pitching when he isn't used to it.

its only 18 gms.. the other 144 games AL has the advantage

BigMeatballDave 05-31-2013 04:01 AM

I'd bet that if there were any change to the DH rule, it would be the NL using a DH.

mdchiefsfan 05-31-2013 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by griZZly64 (Post 9721285)
its only 18 gms.. the other 144 games AL has the advantage

AL has an advantage, how?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.