ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Computers My new build (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=275505)

pr_capone 08-22-2013 12:27 AM

My new build
 
Intel Core i7 4770K Haswell
360GB Corsair Sata3 SSD Drive
16GB Corsair DDR3 1600MHz Memory
Radeon 7970 GHz Edition (equal to the nVidia GTX770)
ASRock Z87 series motherboard
Razer Mamba wireless mouse
Reuse my 850w PSU
Reuse my DVD Burner
Reuse my case
Reuse my 2TB Sata2 storage drive
Reuse my three 25 inch monitors (yes... 3 damn monitors)
Reuse my Microsoft Sidewinder Keyboard

Quiver at my awesomeness you puny ****s.

DaneMcCloud 08-22-2013 12:40 AM

How much faster is that i7 than my i7 2600k?

pr_capone 08-22-2013 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9905585)
How much faster is that i7 than my i7 2600k?

2 generations past your processor and is about 15% faster. I'm coming from a first generation i7 920. I bought it 2 weeks after it was released. This will be a massive upgrade for me at a, roughly, 35% jump from current.

Ming the Merciless 08-22-2013 02:59 AM

Super. Jealous.


U need to install planetside 2 and tell me what fps u get on ultra so I can be even more jelly

loochy 08-22-2013 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9905585)
How much faster is that i7 than my i7 2600k?

However, in my experience, I rarely notice a difference in a computer's speed from the processor unless the difference is just huge. I see the biggest bang from 1.) hard drive (ssd) and 2.) bus and memory speed. I just thought I'd say that as people tend to get hung up on processor speed.

With that being said, it looks like he has the goods in place to actually be able to take advantage of the faster processor.

Also, don't take that as an insult to your computer knowledge or anything. I just felt the need to make the point.

Fish 08-22-2013 10:08 AM

I bet Solitaire looks pretty. Very nice build...

hometeam 08-22-2013 10:18 AM

Very nice build but a 7970 does not quite equal a 770.

Which Corsair SSD are you getting? I have the ForceGT and with some tweaking it can achieve faster speeds than the out of the box version.

Why are you using 1600 memory?

Which ASRock Mobo are you getting? After using Asrock on my current build I don't think I can go back to Asus or Intel branded boards. My Asrock Extreme6/gb is KING of all overclocking.

What cooler are you using for that 4770k ? STOCK COOLER? nonono my friend Newegg has the h100 on sale right now for under a hundred dollars with rebate, and it kept my 3930k within acceptable range even at a 5.2ghz OC

What case are you reusing?

I will still race you with my mega OCed 3930k

hometeam 08-22-2013 10:22 AM

Ah yes one more thing, if you are planning on overclocking you need to look into 'delidding' your haswell chip (this voids the warranty)

Without it they run so hot that big OC's cannot be achieved.

http://www.overclock.net/t/1415403/w...lts-mind-blown

pr_capone 08-22-2013 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 9905985)
Very nice build but a 7970 does not quite equal a 770.

Which Corsair SSD are you getting? I have the ForceGT and with some tweaking it can achieve faster speeds than the out of the box version.

Why are you using 1600 memory?

Which ASRock Mobo are you getting? After using Asrock on my current build I don't think I can go back to Asus or Intel branded boards. My Asrock Extreme6/gb is KING of all overclocking.

What cooler are you using for that 4770k ? STOCK COOLER? nonono my friend Newegg has the h100 on sale right now for under a hundred dollars with rebate, and it kept my 3930k within acceptable range even at a 5.2ghz OC

What case are you reusing?

I will still race you with my mega OCed 3930k

Everything I've read points to equal. Not gonna argue it though... it was $110 cheaper than the GTX770 and whatever shrapnel of performance that the GTX is capable of over the ATi isn't gonna be worth that.

Corsair Force Series GS CSSD-F360GBGS-BK

Because I set an internal budget of so much. I could crank up the juice on my current 920 if inclined and squeeze more life out of this one but I'd rather just run stock.

ASRock Z87 PRO4 motherboard

stock fan for now... not overclocking so no need to go crazy. I can upgrade the fan later if I decide to OC.

Can't remember the case off the top of my head but it is a Cooler Master.

vailpass 08-22-2013 03:12 PM

It's all ball bearings these days.

jd1020 08-22-2013 04:41 PM

Where did you find a 7970 GHz edition for $110 less than a 770?

The cheapest 7970 I see right now is the XFX and its just $50 cheaper than an EVGA/Gigabyte/ASUS 770.

GordonGekko 08-22-2013 05:04 PM

You should be good for 3+ years.

pr_capone 08-22-2013 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9906796)
Where did you find a 7970 GHz edition for $110 less than a 770?

The cheapest 7970 I see right now is the XFX and its just $50 cheaper than an EVGA/Gigabyte/ASUS 770.

Open box deal on newegg. Got it for $300.

Hammock Parties 08-22-2013 11:43 PM

I'm looking into getting an 8-core Xeon system built for me. Know any good sites?

DaneMcCloud 08-22-2013 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 9905618)
2 generations past your processor and is about 15% faster. I'm coming from a first generation i7 920. I bought it 2 weeks after it was released. This will be a massive upgrade for me at a, roughly, 35% jump from current.

Cool.

I built my current computer in December 2012 and while it's keeping up, I haven't had time to check out serious advances since then.

I'll probably be good for another year. Thanks!

DaneMcCloud 08-22-2013 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9907801)
I'm looking into getting an 8-core Xeon system built for me. Know any good sites?

Yeah but that will cost about $4k or so, right?

adkproaudio.com is awesome.

kaplin42 08-23-2013 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 9905574)
Intel Core i7 4770K Haswell
360GB Corsair Sata3 SSD Drive
16GB Corsair DDR3 1600MHz Memory
Radeon 7970 GHz Edition (equal to the nVidia GTX770)
ASRock Z87 series motherboard
Razer Mamba wireless mouse
Reuse my 850w PSU
Reuse my DVD Burner
Reuse my case
Reuse my 2TB Sata2 storage drive
Reuse my three 25 inch monitors (yes... 3 damn monitors)
Reuse my Microsoft Sidewinder Keyboard

Quiver at my awesomeness you puny ****s.

Nice build man. I'm Rocken a similar build myself, and crush everything I have come up against. The 7970 kicks ass.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2013 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9907814)
Yeah but that will cost about $4k or so, right?

adkproaudio.com is awesome.

Nah. Looking at this atm.

http://www.avadirect.com/workstation...asp?PRID=24683

Think I can get what I want for about 2.5k

Baby Lee 08-23-2013 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 9905574)
My new build

Too fat /Omaha

hometeam 08-23-2013 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9907801)
I'm looking into getting an 8-core Xeon system built for me. Know any good sites?

Why wouldn't you do it yourself? Building a PC is as easy as putting together legos, except.. easier.

Nothing will fit together in a way it is not supposed too.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2013 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 9908947)
Why wouldn't you do it yourself? Building a PC is as easy as putting together legos, except.. easier.

Nothing will fit together in a way it is not supposed too.

Because I'd rather just have someone else do it for me.

hometeam 08-23-2013 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9908983)
Because I'd rather just have someone else do it for me.

Fair enough.


The build you linked seems decent enough for the price, but why not get some more RAM since you are using it as a workstation. RAM is cheap and goes along way in a workstation environment.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2013 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 9909001)
Fair enough.


The build you linked seems decent enough for the price, but why not get some more RAM since you are using it as a workstation. RAM is cheap and goes along way in a workstation environment.

Yeah I will probably get 24GB.

DaneMcCloud 08-23-2013 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9907883)
Nah. Looking at this atm.

http://www.avadirect.com/workstation...asp?PRID=24683

Think I can get what I want for about 2.5k

I could build that comp for half that, probably.

Why aren't you using Blackmagic video cards instead of a graphics card?

DaneMcCloud 08-23-2013 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9909005)
Yeah I will probably get 24GB.

I'd go for 32

MTG#10 08-23-2013 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9908983)
Because I'd rather just have someone else do it for me.

Really? I thought you of all people was a DIY'er when it came to PC's. You buy pre-built? This makes me sad.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2013 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTG#10 (Post 9909463)
Really? I thought you of all people was a DIY'er when it came to PC's. You buy pre-built? This makes me sad.

I haven't done this before. I've been building my own PCs for 15 years.

I'm to the point now where I'd rather just have someone else do it. My work is sloppy anyway.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2013 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9909412)
I could build that comp for half that, probably.

Why aren't you using Blackmagic video cards instead of a graphics card?

I'll be installing my own video capture card.

pr_capone 08-27-2013 09:19 PM

http://i.imgur.com/5zlDLYi.jpg

Consistent1 08-27-2013 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9905920)
However, in my experience, I rarely notice a difference in a computer's speed from the processor unless the difference is just huge. I see the biggest bang from 1.) hard drive (ssd) and 2.) bus and memory speed. I just thought I'd say that as people tend to get hung up on processor speed.

With that being said, it looks like he has the goods in place to actually be able to take advantage of the faster processor.

Also, don't take that as an insult to your computer knowledge or anything. I just felt the need to make the point.

It's obviously a nice rig. Thing is if you are watching TV, Youtube, etc, your connection can fail you more than a five year old piece of crap. His system does sound real nice though, congrats.

kcxiv 08-27-2013 11:22 PM

This almost makes me want to build a computer again. Been a while since i have done it. Ill probably do it sometimes next year. Not much of a computer gamer, but this computer i have is like 6 years old now.

AussieChiefsFan 08-28-2013 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 9905574)
Quiver at my awesomeness you puny ****s.

/Thread

DaneMcCloud 08-28-2013 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 9905574)
Quiver at my awesomeness you puny ****s.

My 2 and a half year old computer scored a 7.6 on everything but hard drive, which was 5.9.

The SSD drive must make a HUGE difference. Why did you purchase a 320 when a 256 would suffice?

hometeam 08-28-2013 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 9920604)
/Thread

I do not quiver~

MTG#10 08-28-2013 02:18 PM

http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/4592/499l.jpg

The Franchise 08-28-2013 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9921402)
My 2 and a half year old computer scored a 7.6 on everything but hard drive, which was 5.9.

The SSD drive must make a HUGE difference. Why did you purchase a 320 when a 256 would suffice?

My work computer scores a 7.7/7.8 on everything except the hard drive as well. 5.9.

DaneMcCloud 08-28-2013 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9921608)
My work computer scores a 7.7/7.8 on everything except the hard drive as well. 5.9.

Hmm. I wonder if this test is arbitrary?

mr. tegu 08-28-2013 03:13 PM

My brain in reading this thread:

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/KufiqCh3Qd4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

pr_capone 08-28-2013 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9921402)
Why did you purchase a 320 when a 256 would suffice?

I wouldn't have sufficed for my purpose. With all the applications and games I will have installed on the computer, I will be reaching the low 200GBs in terms of space used. I didn't want to leave myself with that little room to install other programs.

That extra 100GB gives me the piece of mind that I can load several other programs in the future without worry that my main drive won't have enough space.

DaneMcCloud 08-28-2013 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 9921634)
I wouldn't have sufficed for my purpose. With all the applications and games I will have installed on the computer, I will be reaching the low 200GBs in terms of space used. I didn't want to leave myself with that little room to install other programs.

That extra 100GB gives me the piece of mind that I can load several other programs in the future without worry that my main drive won't have enough space.

Cool, thanks. My hard drive is at 111 GB's with program files but I have five other hard drives that do the heavy lifting.

I can't wait until 2TB drives cost as little as the 320 you purchased.

jd1020 08-28-2013 05:27 PM

Just put in an order for my new comp this morning.

http://pcpartpicker.com/p/1xc5A

Old computer is finally getting to the point where I just want to throw it out the ****ing window. In the last couple weeks it gotten really slow to where you can no longer watch youtube videos. But I suppose 10 or so years is pretty good value for the money.

This new one is a little overkill for my needs but w/e. Bought a USB 2.0 CM 690II case a year ago when it was like $40 that its going in.

hometeam 08-28-2013 05:33 PM

Another nice rig~

kaplin42 08-28-2013 06:29 PM

Commence the quivering

http://i1077.photobucket.com/albums/...ps4b35d93b.jpg

Buns 08-28-2013 07:01 PM

http://i46.tinypic.com/1hrrl0.jpg

hometeam 08-28-2013 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kaplin42 (Post 9921947)

To be fair all of these high ends would score that or better in win 8 .

kaplin42 08-28-2013 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 9922554)
To be fair all of these high ends would score that or better in win 8 .

Mine is a win 8 system.

pr_capone 08-28-2013 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kaplin42 (Post 9922555)
Mine is a win 8 system.

I "downgraded" to Windows 7. I cannot cope with Windows 8. I ran that abortion of an OS for 6 months and it was terrible.

hometeam 08-28-2013 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kaplin42 (Post 9922555)
Mine is a win 8 system.

I know, which is why your index goes higher. These other high end systems would likely score even higher than that, since it goes to 9.9 now. Has to do with how they tally the score, not anything saying win 8 would perform better.

kaplin42 08-28-2013 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 9922558)
I "downgraded" to Windows 7. I cannot cope with Windows 8. I ran that abortion of an OS for 6 months and it was terrible.

Win 8 is pretty slick actually. My guess is that you probably didn't like the Metro feature, which admittedly is less than good. But as far as how the OS runs its great and really fast.

jd1020 08-28-2013 11:57 PM

Well, well, well...

Most of my stuff shipped today and my "in stock" processor and cooler from NCIX is apparently on back order.

Gotta love it!

jd1020 08-29-2013 12:00 AM

Isn't Microsoft updating Windows 7 alongside Windows 8 because not many people want to put that touchscreen directed bullshit on their desktop?

That tile shit can DIAF, imo.

kaplin42 08-29-2013 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9922570)
Isn't Microsoft updating Windows 7 alongside Windows 8 because not many people want to put that touchscreen directed bullshit on their desktop?

That tile shit can DIAF, imo.

it's ugly as sin no doubt. But it can be really useful, if you just think of it as a start menu on steroids. But change is hard for people, and this was a dramatic change that was forced on everyone, there is no wonder about the huge backlash from the public about it. But, if you had a touchscreen computer, like say a Surface, the Metro is really easy to use.

But I stand by the OS itself, it is really nice. Also, Windows 8.1 will have the option to revert back to the more traditional desktop theme, and the touchscreen directed bullshit will still be available to those who want it.

Fat Elvis 08-29-2013 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kaplin42 (Post 9922763)
it's ugly as sin no doubt. But it can be really useful, if you just think of it as a start menu on steroids. But change is hard for people, and this was a dramatic change that was forced on everyone, there is no wonder about the huge backlash from the public about it. But, if you had a touchscreen computer, like say a Surface, the Metro is really easy to use.

But I stand by the OS itself, it is really nice. Also, Windows 8.1 will have the option to revert back to the more traditional desktop theme, and the touchscreen directed bullshit will still be available to those who want it.

I love Windows 8, and I love the "Metro" UI; it is at once really, really easy to use and at the same time I can dig deeper than I could before. I don't understand why people don't like it. I think it is really intuitive. The new start screen is great; I can put apps/programs I use a lot in groups that are easy to see and navigate. I currently have 75 apps/programs on my start page sorted into groups. It is easier to find one of those apps/programs and launch it than it is to scroll through threads on CP. Seriously. I can't do that with the old Start page. This is with a mouse as well; this isn't with a touchscreen. The search function is awesome as well. The UI is better than any OS out there as far as I'm concerned. The people who don't like the new IU probably didn't take the requisite 5 minutes to figure out how it works; they just either started bitching about it because it is different or heard someone else who they think knows more about computers than they do bitch about and figured that is what they were supposed to do too.

loochy 08-29-2013 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9922778)
The new start screen is great; I can put apps/programs I use a lot in groups that are easy to see and navigate. I currently have 75 apps/programs on my start page sorted into groups. It is easier to find one of those apps/programs and launch it than it is to scroll through threads on CP. Seriously. I can't do that with the old Start page.

You couldn't do that with the old windows?

DaveNull 08-29-2013 09:47 PM

Quote:

I currently have 75 apps/programs on my start page sorted into groups. It is easier to find one of those apps/programs and launch it than it is to scroll through threads on CP. Seriously.
Or you could hit the Start button on your keyboard and type the name of the program.

Psyko Tek 08-29-2013 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 9905618)
2 generations past your processor and is about 15% faster. I'm coming from a first generation i7 920. I bought it 2 weeks after it was released. This will be a massive upgrade for me at a, roughly, 35% jump from current.

come on give us the cost

Saccopoo 08-31-2013 11:07 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 9920281)

I'm still getting:

7.4
7.5
7.9
7.9
5.9

On my:

AMD Phenom II 970
Mushkin Blackline 8MB RAM
XFX 6950 XXX Edition
Gigabyte GA990FXA UD3 Motherboard

that I put together exactly two years ago.

I was about to purchase a SSD and two more sticks of the same memory along with the AMD FX-8350 Vishera chip. I was thinking of also bumping up to a 79xx series, but the 6950 is still providing excellent results so I'll hold off on that purchase.

Pants 08-31-2013 04:20 PM

Guys, there are actual benchmarking programs that do these sort of things. The Windows score doesn't say much about how good or bad your computer is.

pr_capone 08-31-2013 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psyko Tek (Post 9925319)
come on give us the cost

$1,250 total for all purchased components.

Ming the Merciless 09-01-2013 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9923589)
You couldn't do that with the old windows?

LOL you could do that with DOS

cdcox 09-01-2013 05:21 PM

My rig:

http://dash.coolsmartphone.com/wp-co.../eleven-11.jpg

Baby Lee 09-02-2013 08:53 AM

Got you all beat.

Shopping at an overstock store, they had a bunch of PC desktop cases. Prices $15-20.

One was still in a box, but the outside indicated that it was a pretty nice case, so I opened it to take a closer look.

Of all things, saw a MOBO and HD in there.

Bought it with a quickness. $19.99

Got it home, 2 TB Seagate Barracuda, Blu-Ray Writer, 16 GB DDR III [2x8Gb], Win 7 Home Premium installed.

MOBO is a cheapo ASRock, and Processor looks to be a low end AMD Quad [EDIT: A10 6800K APU], but still

$19.99 - and before allegations of meddling or somesuch, the $19.99 sticker was on the cardboard box encasing it, and on the side of the case itself, right next to the Win 7 Home Premium Product ID# MoF.

pr_capone 09-02-2013 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 9933018)
Got you all beat.

Shopping at an overstock store, they had a bunch of PC desktop cases. Prices $15-20.

One was still in a box, but the outside indicated that it was a pretty nice case, so I opened it to take a closer look.

Of all things, saw a MOBO and HD in there.

Bought it with a quickness. $19.99

Got it home, 2 TB Seagate Barracuda, Blu-Ray Writer, 16 GB DDR III [2x8Gb], Win 7 Home Premium installed.

MOBO is a cheapo ASRock, and Processor looks to be a low end AMD Quad [EDIT: A10 6800K APU], but still

$19.99 - and before allegations of meddling or somesuch, the $19.99 sticker was on the cardboard box encasing it, and on the side of the case itself, right next to the Win 7 Home Premium Product ID# MoF.

NICE

Fish 09-03-2013 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 9929344)
Guys, there are actual benchmarking programs that do these sort of things. The Windows score doesn't say much about how good or bad your computer is.

LOL... this. Go download some actual benchmark tests you guys. The Windows rating score is reeruned, and is not a good benchmark test in the slightest..

MTG#10 09-03-2013 03:11 PM

Im pretty sure most of us know that


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.