ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Xs and Os: The Denver Pick Plays (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=278478)

petegz28 11-10-2013 08:56 PM

Xs and Os: The Denver Pick Plays
 
http://www.foxsportssouthwest.com/nf...blockID=949223

Very interesting read...long but interesting

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-i4PRmcOHqn...640/%231-1.jpg

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fNQaN8-5ix...640/%231-2.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VHRUzQk1GO...600/Pick+1.gif

petegz28 11-10-2013 09:01 PM

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-sbYy3F3HDO...lay+%232-1.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-39RsG6ILeV...1600/Pick2.gif

In58men 11-10-2013 09:02 PM

We now have the blueprint.

petegz28 11-10-2013 09:04 PM

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_pLXGcUudq...600/%233-1.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-qjnAxe1Fmi...1600/Pick3.gif

petegz28 11-10-2013 09:07 PM

Denver seems to be pushing the rules to the extreme and the league appears to be allowing it. As the article notes, other teams getting away with this is a big ? but Manning is obviously going to be allowed to do so.

vailpass 11-10-2013 09:09 PM

Why do you hate teamwork?

TomBarndtsTwin 11-10-2013 09:09 PM

The Chiefs should start incorporating these plays into their offense.

I mean, hell, if they're not going to call it, then might as well take advantage of it.

If they start calling it on KC, the they'll have to start calling it on Denver too. What have we got to lose??


"If you ain't cheatin, then you ain't tryin."

tredadda 11-10-2013 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 10176584)
We now have the blueprint.

Not sure I would use Dallas's defense as the blueprint on how to beat Denver.

Goldmember 11-10-2013 09:12 PM

If I remember correctly, didn't Chiefs get called for this about three times in one game? I guess they aren't as sneaky smooth as the Donkeys.

petegz28 11-10-2013 09:12 PM

Quote:

Is it illegal? Let's review offensive pass interference from the NFL Rulebook:

There shall be no interference with a forward pass thrown from behind the line.

It is pass interference by either team when any player movement beyond the line of scrimmage significantly hinders the progress of an eligible player of such player’s opportunity to catch the ball. Offensive pass interference rules apply from the time the ball is snapped until the ball is touched. Defensive pass interference rules apply from the time the ball is thrown until the ball is touched.

Actions that constitute offensive pass interference include but are not limited to:

(a) Blocking downfield by an offensive player prior to the ball being touched.

(b) Initiating contact with a defender by shoving or pushing off thus creating a separation in an attempt to catch a pass.

(c) Driving through a defender who has established a position on the field.
Actions that do not constitute offensive pass interference include but are not limited to:
(a) Incidental contact by a receiver’s hands, arms, or body when both players are competing for the ball or neither player is looking for the ball.
(b) Inadvertent touching of feet when both players are playing the ball or neither player is playing the ball.
(c) Contact that would normally be considered pass interference, but the ball is clearly uncatchable by involved players.
Note 1: If there is any question whether player contact is incidental, the ruling should be no interference.
Note 2: Defensive players have as much right to the path of the ball as eligible offensive players.
Note 3: Pass interference for both teams ends when the pass is touched.
Note 4: There can be no pass interference at or behind the line of scrimmage, but defensive actions such as tackling a receiver can still result in a 5-yard penalty for defensive holding, if accepted.

Take special note of "Note 1" - "If there is any question whether player contact is incidental, the ruling should be no interference."



Also, note that the pick play is basically a legal play if the pass is behind the line of scrimmage. So, these two loopholes keep these picks from ever being called, even if the letter of the law is not followed by the offense.

Remember, this league wants offense and wants games with high levels of drama and excitement. Calling offensive pass interference is not that.

In fact, just to give you the up to date numbers, there have been 77 league games this season and we have seen just 22 offensive pass interference calls (83 defensive pass interference). Eric Decker has been called twice this season, but when nobody ever calls these plays, why not run them? They are nearly impossible to defend. Let's look at the 3 most obvious pick plays on Sunday.
http://www.foxsportssouthwest.com/nf...blockID=949223

petegz28 11-10-2013 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goldmember (Post 10176621)
If I remember correctly, didn't Chiefs get called for this about three times in one game? I guess they aren't as sneaky smooth as the Donkeys.

Yep. But this is now the bread and butter of the Manning offense so now it's okay....I guess

SPATCH 11-10-2013 09:14 PM

Last .gif, bottom of the screen is obvious and unapologetic pick.

Strongside 11-10-2013 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10176608)
Why do you hate teamwork?

Why do you love cheating?

Mother****erJones 11-10-2013 09:19 PM

The only way they get open.

listopencil 11-10-2013 09:23 PM

Nah, it's just a set of complimentary routes.

petegz28 11-10-2013 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10176659)
Nah, it's just a set of complimentary routes.

Hardly.....

Strongside 11-10-2013 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10176659)
Nah, it's just a set of complimentary routes.

That just happen to run receivers into direct contact with a neutral defender and impede their path to the play before the ball is thrown.

listopencil 11-10-2013 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10176666)
That just happen to run receivers into direct contact with a neutral defender and impede their path to the play before the ball is thrown.

They aren't making contact, and it's not the receiver's fault when the cover guy guesses wrong.

petegz28 11-10-2013 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10176675)
They aren't making contact, and it's not the receiver's fault when the cover guy guesses wrong.

Actually in some instances they are making contact but not enough so it's considered "incidental"

Strongside 11-10-2013 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10176675)
They aren't making contact, and it's not the receiver's fault when the cover guy guesses wrong.

Give me a ****ing break dude. Do you even watch the games? They are making tons of contact. When a ****ing linebacker has to do a swim move on a receiver to get around him...that's the result of an illegal pick play.

listopencil 11-10-2013 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 10176678)
Actually in some instances they are making contact but not enough so it's considered "incidental"

Yeah, I meant meaningful contact.

Mother****erJones 11-10-2013 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10176675)
They aren't making contact, and it's not the receiver's fault when the cover guy guesses wrong.

So decker never made contact with the browns defender in a previous gif shown?

Strongside 11-10-2013 09:30 PM

This is from another article...

3. Defending the “pick” play: Two thoughts behind this. If you are going to play from an off-man position (like we see from the Texans), the CB has to take an angle to the receiver that will allow him to make a play on ball. On the replay, the CB takes a flat angle—and that isn’t the proper technique. Instead, take an angle that puts you in a position to play the “up field” shoulder of the WR. However, from my perspective, there is no need to play off-man coverage inside of the 10-yard line—because there are too many opportunities to get beat. Align in a press-man look and attack the WR. Disrupt his release and force the “pick” to come right through you—which should draw a flag. Bottom line: don’t give the WR room to breathe inside of the 10-yard line and play physical when Cover 0 is called in the huddle.

Teams are trying to do this, but the officials aren't calling it.

listopencil 11-10-2013 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10176685)
Give me a ****ing break dude. Do you even watch the games? They are making tons of contact. When a ****ing linebacker has to do a swim move on a receiver to get around him...that's the result of an illegal pick play.


You mean that last gif where the LB doesn't adjust to our TE and gets caught in the middle of the field because the D set up wrong? Not our fault, dude. Make that decision before the snap or climb uphill with everybody watching.

Psyko Tek 11-10-2013 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin (Post 10176610)
The Chiefs should start incorporating these plays into their offense.

I mean, hell, if they're not going to call it, then might as well take advantage of it.

If they start calling it on KC, the they'll have to start calling it on Denver too. What have we got to lose??


"If you ain't cheatin, then you ain't tryin."

are you NEW to every thing?

WE ARE THE CHIEFS
WE DO NOT GET CALLS


denver could set up a minefield, and a machine gun nest and it would be legal
you every watched line play?


****in' n00b

petegz28 11-10-2013 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10176688)
Yeah, I meant meaningful contact.

They are having the pick guys turn around like they are expecting a pass which is pure bullshit. Look, this is more on the league than it is on Denver. However, as was stated before, we got called 3 times in 1 game last year for this shit and suddenly now it's okay as long as it's Manning.

I would be interested to see other teams do this and see how it gets called.

listopencil 11-10-2013 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 10176697)
They are having the pick guys turn around like they are expecting a pass which is pure bullshit. Look, this is more on the league than it is on Denver. However, as was stated before, we got called 3 times in 1 game last year for this shit and suddenly now it's okay as long as it's Manning.

I would be interested to see other teams do this and see how it gets called.

Denver should take advantage of however the refs are calling every single game they play. The refs tend to suck, they are far from consistent on pass interference (O or D) and this is legal. They'd be stupid not to do it.

Strongside 11-10-2013 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10176693)
You mean that last gif where the LB doesn't adjust to our TE and gets caught in the middle of the field because the D set up wrong? Not our fault, dude. Make that decision before the snap or climb uphill with everybody watching.

I agree that there is plenty of misalignment going on in those gifs, but I'm not referring specifically to those gifs. Eric Decker today, on several plays, completely blocked a guy before the ball left Manning's hands. Welker too. The screen play to Demaryius Thomas was an obvious one. 2 defenders were engaged by blockers before the pass had been thrown. Jim Nance mentioned something like "Welker did a great job of timing his block just as Manning threw it" but that was bullshit. It was early.

I know we'll see it next week and I know it'll piss me off. I do feel confident though that our secondary is athletic and physical enough to counter it and probably make it work in our favor. Those wheel routes are the ones that Peyton has been picked on...and it's happened because he expects the pick to open the receiver up...when the corner or safety takes a good route to the ball and isn't knocked off his path by one of the other receivers, they're in a prime position to undercut the route and snatch the ball.

Mother****erJones 11-10-2013 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10176711)
I agree that there is plenty of misalignment going on in those gifs, but I'm not referring specifically to those gifs. Eric Decker today, on several plays, completely blocked a guy before the ball left Manning's hands. Welker too. The screen play to Demaryius Thomas was an obvious one. 2 defenders were engaged by blockers before the pass had been thrown. Jim Nance mentioned something like "Welker did a great job of timing his block just as Manning threw it" but that was bullshit. It was early.

I know we'll see it next week and I know it'll piss me off. I do feel confident though that our secondary is athletic and physical enough to counter it and probably make it work in our favor. Those wheel routes are the ones that Peyton has been picked on...and it's happened because he expects the pick to open the receiver up...when the corner or safety takes a good route to the ball and isn't knocked off his path by one of the other receivers, they're in a prime position to undercut the route and snatch the ball.

Not to mention Chris Clark had a blatant hold on a guy in that play. He practically tried to tackle the defender

Ragged Robin 11-10-2013 09:42 PM

There's a difference between an illegal pick-play and designed rub routes versus man coverage. These are the reasons why bunch formations even exist. It's only illegal if the receivers are actively blocking/knocking people over before the ball is in the air. Lern2football noobs.

Silock 11-10-2013 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10176711)
I agree that there is plenty of misalignment going on in those gifs, but I'm not referring specifically to those gifs. Eric Decker today, on several plays, completely blocked a guy before the ball left Manning's hands. Welker too. The screen play to Demaryius Thomas was an obvious one. 2 defenders were engaged by blockers before the pass had been thrown. Jim Nance mentioned something like "Welker did a great job of timing his block just as Manning threw it" but that was bullshit. It was early.

I know we'll see it next week and I know it'll piss me off. I do feel confident though that our secondary is athletic and physical enough to counter it and probably make it work in our favor. Those wheel routes are the ones that Peyton has been picked on...and it's happened because he expects the pick to open the receiver up...when the corner or safety takes a good route to the ball and isn't knocked off his path by one of the other receivers, they're in a prime position to undercut the route and snatch the ball.

And if he hesitates because of the coverage, then he'll be saying "Hello" to Misters Hali, Houston and Poe.

listopencil 11-10-2013 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10176711)
I agree that there is plenty of misalignment going on in those gifs, but I'm not referring specifically to those gifs. Eric Decker today, on several plays, completely blocked a guy before the ball left Manning's hands. Welker too. The screen play to Demaryius Thomas was an obvious one. 2 defenders were engaged by blockers before the pass had been thrown. Jim Nance mentioned something like "Welker did a great job of timing his block just as Manning threw it" but that was bullshit. It was early.

I know we'll see it next week and I know it'll piss me off. I do feel confident though that our secondary is athletic and physical enough to counter it and probably make it work in our favor. Those wheel routes are the ones that Peyton has been picked on...and it's happened because he expects the pick to open the receiver up...when the corner or safety takes a good route to the ball and isn't knocked off his path by one of the other receivers, they're in a prime position to undercut the route and snatch the ball.

I didn't get to watch the entire game, and I was distracted when I did get to watch. I'm not saying it didn't happen. Just that I didn't see it. There is a lot of physical contact going on near the LOS though. Guys on D are trying to knock our guys off of routes, and we're trying to set them up to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. It wouldn't surprise me if Decker got his hands on a guy and started blocking too early.

Strongside 11-10-2013 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10176726)
There's a difference between an illegal pick-play and designed rub routes versus man coverage. These are the reasons why bunch formations even exist. It's only illegal if the receivers are actively blocking/knocking people over before the ball is in the air. Lern2football noobs.

Learn to watch the Denver offense. What you just described as being illegal is exactly what's happening. Truth be told, I don't give a shit either way. If Manning is on his ass, then it's tough to throw the football to a wide open receiver.

petegz28 11-10-2013 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10176742)
I didn't get to watch the entire game, and I was distracted when I did get to watch. I'm not saying it didn't happen. Just that I didn't see it. There is a lot of physical contact going on near the LOS though. Guys on D are trying to knock our guys off of routes, and we're trying to set them up to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. It wouldn't surprise me if Decker got his hands on a guy and started blocking too early.

The hold was 5-10 yards downfield

Ragged Robin 11-10-2013 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10176743)
Learn to watch the Denver offense. What you just described as being illegal is exactly what's happening. Truth be told, I don't give a shit either way. If Manning is on his ass, then it's tough to throw the football to a wide open receiver.

lol not at all. You're exaggerating at best, refs would never flag that unless the receivers are blatantly blocking and don't even look like running routes. Plays like in the gif happen ALL THE TIME.

listopencil 11-10-2013 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 10176747)
The hold was 5-10 yards downfield

I don't know which play you are talking about.

stevieray 11-10-2013 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10176752)
lol not at all. You're exaggerating at best, refs would never flag that unless the receivers are blatantly blocking and don't even look like running routes. Plays like in the gif happen ALL THE TIME.

talk about exaggeration. THEY aren't running routes.....at the very least they are holding.

Ragged Robin 11-10-2013 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 10176760)
talk about exaggeration. THEY aren't running routes.....at the very least they are holding.

Incidental and unavoidable contact. Notice how they CONTINUE on with their routes. Completely legal play that happens in every single game. Out of all the illegal "pick plays" the one in the gif doesn't show it AT ALL. You guys seriously need to watch more football if you think that's a great example of an illegal pick play rofl.

Seriously. All that's shown is just a well executed play that was completely designed to beat the coverage that was played.

baitism 11-10-2013 09:57 PM

The CBs can always light up the receiver. At least that will force the refs to address it.

Silock 11-10-2013 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10176766)
Incidental and unavoidable contact. Notice how they CONTINUE on with their routes. Completely legal play that happens in every single game. Out of all the illegal "pick plays" the one in the gif doesn't show it AT ALL. You guys seriously need to watch more football if you think that's a great example of an illegal pick play rofl.

Seriously. All that's shown is just a well executed play that was completely designed to beat the coverage that was played.

Bullshit. Look at the second .gif. Moreno ALTERS HIS ROUTE and lowers his shoulder into the defender. He runs straight TO the defender; he's not running a route.

KChiefer 11-10-2013 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10176766)
Incidental and unavoidable contact. Notice how they CONTINUE on with their routes. Completely legal play that happens in every single game. Out of all the illegal "pick plays" the one in the gif doesn't show it AT ALL. You guys seriously need to watch more football if you think that's a great example of an illegal pick play rofl.

Seriously. All that's shown is just a well executed play that was completely designed to beat the coverage that was played.

Please just STFU.

Thomas points to the spot where he wants Moreno to run his pick. And calling it a "rub" doesn't magically make it legal.

Ragged Robin 11-10-2013 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 10176791)
Bullshit. Look at the second .gif. Moreno ALTERS HIS ROUTE and lowers his shoulder into the defender. He runs straight TO the defender; he's not running a route.

rofl you guys are grasping for straws. Look, I hate Denver as much as the next guy (well except the "fans" that are apparently expect us to lose to prove that Alex and the rest sucks), but the play shown is nowhere close to what would be considered an "illegal pick play." Please google the term or youtube or whatever to get a better idea of what it is. If the receivers completely truck/tackle or otherwise stop their route at the point of contact to blatantly block, it's an illegal pick play. What's shown is a perfectly legal rub route out of a bunch formation versus man coverage doing EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED TO DO.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-10-2013 10:05 PM

Absolute horeshit these plays are allowed. One game they got 200 plus yards of YAC cause of this garbage.

WhiteWhale 11-10-2013 10:05 PM

KC runs plays just like this all the time.

In his time in Philly Reid ran stuff like this more than anyone.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-10-2013 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10176810)
rofl you guys are grasping for straws. Look, I hate Denver as much as the next guy (well except the "fans" that are apparently expect us to lose to prove that Alex and the rest sucks), but the play shown is nowhere close to what would be considered an "illegal pick play." Please google the term or youtube or whatever to get a better idea of what it is. If the receivers completely truck/tackle or otherwise stop their route at the point of contact to blatantly block, it's an illegal pick play. What's shown is a perfectly legal rub route out of a bunch formation versus man coverage doing EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED TO DO.

Bullshir. Only a complete donco ballwashet would defend these plays.

lewdog 11-10-2013 10:06 PM

Eat shit you mouth breathing, donkey loving, AIDS infested, cheating sacks of shit that we call Bronco fans.

Ragged Robin 11-10-2013 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 10176819)
Bullshir. Only a complete donco ballwashet would defend these plays.

EVERY TEAM who has a bunch formation in their playbook (aka ALL 32 OF THEM) run designed rub routes. The sole reason they exist is to beat man coverage. Please watch more football before going full reerun. "hurrdurr well you must love the broncos because I don't know what a rub route is."

Silock 11-10-2013 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10176810)
rofl you guys are grasping for straws. Look, I hate Denver as much as the next guy (well except the "fans" that are apparently expect us to lose to prove that Alex and the rest sucks), but the play shown is nowhere close to what would be considered an "illegal pick play." Please google the term or youtube or whatever to get a better idea of what it is. If the receivers completely truck/tackle or otherwise stop their route at the point of contact to blatantly block, it's an illegal pick play. What's shown is a perfectly legal rub route out of a bunch formation versus man coverage doing EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED TO DO.

Bullshit. He clearly blocks the defender. Hardly a "rub route."

WhiteWhale 11-10-2013 10:09 PM

Did any of you watch Bill Walsh's 49ers?

Holmgren's packers?

Seriously... we're pitching a fit about pick plays? Offenses will get called for it one out of twenty times. It's not new. Whaaa whaa whaaa. Boo hoo.

stevieray 11-10-2013 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10176766)
You guys seriously need to watch more football

STFU, n00b...grabbing a DB by the shoulder pads is not incidental and unavoidable.

Strongside 11-10-2013 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 10176791)
Bullshit. Look at the second .gif. Moreno ALTERS HIS ROUTE and lowers his shoulder into the defender. He runs straight TO the defender; he's not running a route.

Don't bother trying to get through to this guy. He has been indoctrinated and is too far gone.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-10-2013 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10176829)
EVERY TEAM who has a bunch formation in their playbook (aka ALL 32 OF THEM) run designed rub routes. The sole reason they exist is to beat man coverage. Please watch more football before going full reerun. "hurrdurr well you must love the broncos because I don't know what a rub route is."

This is typical cheatin donks and you are sucking their dick on bronco week. Go **** yourself.

WhiteWhale 11-10-2013 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10176829)
EVERY TEAM who has a bunch formation in their playbook (aka ALL 32 OF THEM) run designed rub routes. The sole reason they exist is to beat man coverage. Please watch more football before going full reerun. "hurrdurr well you must love the broncos because I don't know what a rub route is."

I've felt (since watching Favre's packers) that WR's are allowed WAY too much intentional contact on these routes.

It is what it is though. There's something hypocritical about watching fans of a team coached by Andy Reid bitching about this.

Mother****erJones 11-10-2013 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 10176822)
Eat shit you mouth breathing, donkey loving, AIDS infested, cheating sacks of shit that we call Bronco fans.

:) REP

Strongside 11-10-2013 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 10176791)
Bullshit. Look at the second .gif. Moreno ALTERS HIS ROUTE and lowers his shoulder into the defender. He runs straight TO the defender; he's not running a route.

He literally looks to be chasing the CB, instead of the other way around.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-10-2013 10:12 PM

KC runs NOTHI N G compared to this.

WhiteWhale 11-10-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 10176858)
KC runs NOTHI N G compared to this.

Sure we do.

We've even been flagged for it.

Strongside 11-10-2013 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 10176872)
Sure we do.

We've even been flagged for it.

Has Denver? I'd be interested to see the numbers.

Strongside 11-10-2013 10:15 PM

White Whale, are you actually a Mastodon fan, or just using the image?

Ragged Robin 11-10-2013 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 10176832)
Bullshit. He clearly blocks the defender. Hardly a "rub route."

Anytime two routes are designed to cross each other as close as possible aka "rubbing" so that their trailing defenders would either run into each other or the receiver to clear out is a "rub route." Almost every single play ran out of a bunched formation does this. This is how you manufacture someone open versus man coverage. Come on, even Madden-brainwashed kids these days know this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 10176847)
I've felt (since watching Favre's packers) that WR's are allowed WAY too much intentional contact on these routes.

It is what it is though. There's something hypocritical about watching fans of a team coached by Andy Reid bitching about this.

Yeah it's pretty hilarious. A blatantly "West Coast Offense" team with absolutely clueless fans complaining about one of the staples of their own style of offense.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-10-2013 10:16 PM

Nobody runs it near as much as those clowns. Sure everyone does it occasionally but they abuse it.

WhiteWhale 11-10-2013 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10176874)
Has Denver? I'd be interested to see the numbers.

Look man, I know. It's more of a Manning thing though. His WR's get away with more contact and DB's against him get away with less. That's how it's been for a decade now.

I just don't see the point bitching about it. It's not a new thing to deal with regarding manning. Press the WR's hard and screw up the timing. We should be able to do that.

I'll bet on at least one of Avery's long YAC plays there was a questionable pick involved... probably by Bowe or a TE (cos avery couldn't pick his nose)

I always think back to Freddie Mitchell destroying Randall Gay in the SB on an obvious pick play and Owens got a huge gain. Afterwards T.O. is all "Freddie threw a nice pick".

It was before the ball was thrown. They know what they're doing.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-10-2013 10:17 PM

**** off bronco nuthugger!

Silock 11-10-2013 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10176877)
Anytime two routes are designed to cross each other as close as possible aka "rubbing" so that their trailing defenders would either run into each other or the receiver to clear out is a "rub route." Almost every single play ran out of a bunched formation does this. This is how you manufacture someone open versus man coverage. Come on, Madden-brainwashed kids these days know this.

That's true. However, this is NOT AT ALL what happens in the second play. Look at him. He takes two steps, then turns sideways, and tracks the CB laterally in order to hit him with his shoulder. That's NOT route running and is a clear violation of the rules.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-10-2013 10:18 PM

Don't test my patience during donk week n00bs

Strongside 11-10-2013 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 10176882)
Look man, I know. It's more of a Manning thing though. His WR's get away with more contact and DB's against him get away with less. That's how it's been for a decade now.

I just don't see the point bitching about it. It's not a new thing to deal with regarding manning. Press the WR's hard and screw up the timing. We should be able to do that.

Agreed. I was seriously wondering, though, if they'd been called for picks yet this year?

TEX 11-10-2013 10:20 PM

The CHEATING DONX run illegal picks as much as Indy used to when BIG HEAD played there. Now add a little Crisco to the OL and chop blocks & they'll be just as bad as the HORSE FACE CHEATING DONX were. **** EVERYTHING Denver!

WhiteWhale 11-10-2013 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10176876)
White Whale, are you actually a Mastodon fan, or just using the image?

Leviathan is one of the greatest albums of the 00's. I've seen them live 3X. I'm kinda fading after the recent album, but that takes nothing way from the masterpiece in my avatar.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-10-2013 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10176898)
The CHEATING DONX run illegal picks as much as Indy ysed to when NIG HEAD played there. Now add a little Crisco to the OL and chop blocks & they'll be just as bad as the HORSE FACE CHEATING DONX were. **** EVERYTHING Denver!

That is the spirit!!! :)

Mother****erJones 11-10-2013 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10176898)
The CHEATING DONX run illegal picks as much as Indy ysed to when NIG HEAD played there. Now add a little Crisco to the OL and chop blocks & they'll be just as bad as the HORSE FACE CHEATING DONX were. **** EVERYTHING Denver!

Wut?

WhiteWhale 11-10-2013 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10176893)
Agreed. I was seriously wondering, though, if they'd been called for picks yet this year?

I have no idea. They probably get away with it like Favre's packers did in the day.

Silock 11-10-2013 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10176908)
Wut?

I think he typo'd. He's edited it to BIG HEAD.

Strongside 11-10-2013 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 10176900)
Leviathan is one of the greatest albums of the 00's. I've seen them live 3X. I'm kinda fading after the recent album, but that takes nothing way from the masterpiece in my avatar.

REP for knowing good music.

Goldmember 11-10-2013 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 10176911)
I think he typo'd. He's edited it to BIG HEAD.

or NAG head :)

notorious 11-10-2013 10:27 PM

Don't piss me off this early in the week. I need a slow build until my distain explodes with the power of a Tsar bomb during the game.

listopencil 11-10-2013 10:28 PM

Did you guys get to the end of that article?


"My takeaway is that this is one of many ways that this Denver team can beat you and that smart offenses should look to steal these ideas. Not sure the officials will always afford you the same wiggle room that Manning gets, but if the NFL doesn't see this as anything more than "football", then teams are not using all their advantages to mount drives and scores with a simple technique like this."



Silock 11-10-2013 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10176924)
Did you guys get to the end of that article?


"My takeaway is that this is one of many ways that this Denver team can beat you and that smart offenses should look to steal these ideas. Not sure the officials will always afford you the same wiggle room that Manning gets, but if the NFL doesn't see this as anything more than "football", then teams are not using all their advantages to mount drives and scores with a simple technique like this."



Hoping that the referees ignore the rules doesn't seem like a great strategy.

WhiteWhale 11-10-2013 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10176912)
REP for knowing good music.

Well my taste in women, wine, professions, and food all leave a lot to be desired... so at least I have that. :thumb:

Chiefshrink 11-10-2013 10:32 PM

C'mon Chieftan Fans !! Stop will ya !!! Just stop all the 'cheating BS' talk ! All it does is show your anxiety about next week's game. Not my anxiety of course BUT this 'cheating BS talk' reminds me of all the Bronco O-line so-called illegal zone blocking crap:rolleyes:

Play the game and let chips fall where they may !! But the Colts did show how to beat the Donks. In Mannings face all game and play man to man in our 2ndary the whole game while we chew up the clock with dink and dunk and the run;)

WhiteWhale 11-10-2013 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10176924)
Did you guys get to the end of that article?


"My takeaway is that this is one of many ways that this Denver team can beat you and that smart offenses should look to steal these ideas. Not sure the officials will always afford you the same wiggle room that Manning gets, but if the NFL doesn't see this as anything more than "football", then teams are not using all their advantages to mount drives and scores with a simple technique like this."



The dumbest thing about this is some weird idea that Manning is behind it.

Teams have been doing this forever. It can kill a drive if the officials 'decide' to call it though, and Manning is more likely to get defensive holding or defensive PI if his WR runs over a defender.

It sucks, but it's not new.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.