![]() |
So if you had one more chance
To run the last offensive play again would you try a 60 yard FG? It was in a dome. I'm not sure but it's a thought.
|
no
|
stop it!
|
My distrust in Ryan Succop is so great that after years of lurking, my first ever post is used to simply say:
No |
Quote:
But at the end of the 1st half on the Colts 41 with 5 seconds, I would definitely have tried a 58 yd kick. Why the hell not? I don't understand why he didn't try that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No way.
The probability of completing the pass or getting a pass interference penalty was way higher than making a 60 yard field goal |
With only enough time left for 1 more play in the first half. I think Andy's was thinking.
The odds of Succup making that kick & the odds of a Alex completing the hailmary are about the same. So lets go for the hailmary TD instead of the field goal. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Either way,that ****ing game hurts as bad now as it did Saturday night.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Unless you're convinced your kicker has absolutely NO CHANCE |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The three plays before that is where you might want a do over. Gain 15 yards and you have a make-able FG. |
Quote:
I will go to my grave saying that game was rigged. Phantom clip called on a punt return for a TD by Cory Dixon. Then to top it off. The Seminoles fumbled at the 2 yard line,Huskers recovered the ball in the endzone & the refs gave Fla-st a TD anyways. :spock: Lets not forget the phantom pass interference call at the end of the game to set up Fla-st for the game winning fieldgoal https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/...55303613_n.jpg |
The guy badly missed in San Diego. I have no problem with the play call. 5 inches to the damn left.
|
is 5 seconds long enough to run 2 plays if the first is a 2 step drop with a quick throw to the sideline?
|
Quote:
|
I wouldn't have tried a field goal. I would have tried a play designed for Hemmingway in the slot. The problem with that play was relying on Bowe to make a play in my opinion. After the incomplete pass, I kept thinking about the 4th down drop at the end of the Oakland game a few years ago. Bowe is just not clutch and I would have preferred a play designed for someone else. Not only that, the Colts were obviously looking for a play to Bowe because of all the injuries.
|
The bubble screen play call that got us the IG call was just bad... bad play call in that situation.
|
Regardless of whatever we should of done, we should, have a kicker that has a leg strong enough to kick a 60 yarder. The fact that he isn't a factor in that situation screams we need a new kicker.
|
Quote:
This |
You go for it on 4th and Goal from the 1.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Welcome aboard Why Not. I too enjoy the repartee in Chiefs Planet. Of course, one must be prepared to be called out for just about anything. I'll start by suggesting that I back into an Aids tree whilst munching on a poison-infested donut.
As per this thread, I agree whole-heartedly, NO SUCKUP. |
Quote:
I was in shock on Sat Night - Numb...couldn't feel any pain. Now I'm pissed off and embarrassed. |
Quote:
|
No, you go for it. Even if you make the FG, it leaves too much time on the clock and you just know the Colts would've easily gone downfield and kicked a winning FG.
The only way the Chiefs salvage that game is if Bowe makes that catch and they run the clock down and kick a FG with no time remaining. Even if Bowe had caught it and scored, we would've lost 52-51. |
Not with Succop. And it wouldn't have mattered, because Luck would have then had 2 minutes to go win it.
I actually thought we ran a good, aggressive play. And if he comes down with it we run out the clock and kick. But we're the Chiefs, so of course he was going to come down out of bounds... |
Nope. Our $50M blocker should have put both feet down in bounds.
|
If our $50M blocker doesn't drop an easy 3rd down conversion earlier we might have won as well.
|
Well since we have no athletic WR's... We shoulda taken the field goal.
|
I would have gone for the TD on the 4th and 1 that we had instead of kicking that FG.
|
I can recall extra long field goal attempts by Succop getting blocked before. His kickoffs are not the greatest. With the Colts luck Saturday, it would have been run back.
|
I read the title and was almost ready to bust out an Eminem rap.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thanks man. And yes I am prepared to be told to DIAF |
Quote:
|
My bad.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/0Ogs_NsXh58" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
With Succop we'd be lucky as hell if he could connect from 53/54. 60? Almost impossible.
|
Quote:
Well, Alabama Auburn proved that isn't quite true. If you really don't think he has the leg for it, then it's a real risk. The field goal protection team is basically two specialists in the holder and kicker, a bunch of fatties to block, and not much else. It's not exactly the guys you'd want on the field to defend a kick return, which is sort of what you'd be dealing with... |
Quote:
You don't need to trust him. You need to think "the odds of a kick from 60 are better than the odds of converting 4th and 11". But the time left on the clock is also important, as others have pointed out. Leaving the Colts with 2 minutes there isn't likely to end well... |
All that said, you guys might look for a really good kicker in the 4th or 5th round of the draft maybe. Guys like that are a very nice bonus for a team that is on the rise. They can affect field position on kickoffs and get the 3 when you need the damn 3.
|
Succop has been pretty solid over the years. I think you gotta stay with a kicker through the tough times. Blair Walsh was terrible at Georgia in his senior year and look at him now. Succop really only had one bad one all year. I'd bring in some competition but that's about it. You aren't going to find much better.
|
So if you had one more chance
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We missed the 4th down completion by 2 or 3 inches. Succop would have missed a near 60 yard FG by a lot more than that.
|
Quote:
|
No
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.