ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs So if you had one more chance (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=280466)

philfree 01-07-2014 01:04 AM

So if you had one more chance
 
To run the last offensive play again would you try a 60 yard FG? It was in a dome. I'm not sure but it's a thought.

LiL stumppy 01-07-2014 01:10 AM

no

Simply Red 01-07-2014 01:11 AM

stop it!

Why Not? 01-07-2014 01:13 AM

My distrust in Ryan Succop is so great that after years of lurking, my first ever post is used to simply say:

No

cosmo20002 01-07-2014 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 10352659)
To run the last offensive play again would you try a 60 yard FG? It was in a dome. I'm not sure but it's a thought.

At the end with 4th & 11 from the IND 43 with 2:00 left, I'd go for the 11 yards.

But at the end of the 1st half on the Colts 41 with 5 seconds, I would definitely have tried a 58 yd kick. Why the hell not? I don't understand why he didn't try that.

Simply Red 01-07-2014 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 10352671)
My distrust in Ryan Succop is so great that after years of lurking, my first ever post is used to simply say:

No

yes, i agree.

pr_capone 01-07-2014 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10352677)
But at the end of the 1st half on the Colts 41 with 5 seconds, I would definitely have tried a 58 yd kick. Why the hell not? I don't understand why he didn't try that.

I wondered the same. Sure it was a low percentage kick but there was nothing to lose by trying it.

cosmo20002 01-07-2014 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 10352681)
I wondered the same. Sure it was a low percentage kick but there was nothing to lose by trying it.

I didn't get it. No worry about turning it over at the spot since the half would be over. I guess it is possible the FG kick could be returned, but that seems like such a small possibility. There's gotta at least be a 25% chance he makes that kick.

BossChief 01-07-2014 01:33 AM

No way.

The probability of completing the pass or getting a pass interference penalty was way higher than making a 60 yard field goal

LiveSteam 01-07-2014 01:35 AM

With only enough time left for 1 more play in the first half. I think Andy's was thinking.
The odds of Succup making that kick & the odds of a Alex completing the hailmary are about the same. So lets go for the hailmary TD instead of the field goal.

LiveSteam 01-07-2014 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10352686)
No way.

The probability of completing the pass or getting a pass interference penalty was way higher than making a 60 yard field goal

I agree with this to

philfree 01-07-2014 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10352677)
At the end with 4th & 11 from the IND 43 with 2:00 left, I'd go for the 11 yards.

But at the end of the 1st half on the Colts 41 with 5 seconds, I would definitely have tried a 58 yd kick. Why the hell not? I don't understand why he didn't try that.

Probably a better chance then a Hail Mary!

Smed1065 01-07-2014 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 10352681)
I wondered the same. Sure it was a low percentage kick but there was nothing to lose by trying it.

This or the 1 yard line TD.

LiveSteam 01-07-2014 01:37 AM

Either way,that ****ing game hurts as bad now as it did Saturday night.

Smed1065 01-07-2014 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 10352671)
My distrust in Ryan Succop is so great that after years of lurking, my first ever post is used to simply say:

No

With a name of why not?

listopencil 01-07-2014 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10352685)
I didn't get it. No worry about turning it over at the spot since the half would be over. I guess it is possible the FG kick could be returned, but that seems like such a small possibility. There's gotta at least be a 25% chance he makes that kick.

...or one of those "pick" plays that Andy had up his sleeve.

cosmo20002 01-07-2014 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveSteam (Post 10352687)
With only enough time left for 1 more play in the first half. I think Andy's was thinking.
The odds of Succup making that kick & the odds of a Alex completing the hailmary are about the same. So lets go for the hailmary TD instead of the field goal.

58 yard FG indoors vs Hail Mary from 60+ yards out? C'mon...FG has the better chance of success.
Unless you're convinced your kicker has absolutely NO CHANCE

cosmo20002 01-07-2014 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveSteam (Post 10352692)
Either way,that ****ing game hurts as bad now as it did Saturday night.

Yeah, I'm still pissed. Been taking out my frustration on dipshits who think that game and the NFL is fixed.

cdcox 01-07-2014 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10352696)
58 yard FG indoors vs Hail Mary from 60+ yards out? C'mon...FG has the better chance of success.
Unless you're convinced your kicker has absolutely NO CHANCE

Career long is 54 yards. He's 9 of 17 from 50+ yards. Odds weren't good, even indoors.

The three plays before that is where you might want a do over. Gain 15 yards and you have a make-able FG.

LiveSteam 01-07-2014 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10352700)
Yeah, I'm still pissed. Been taking out my frustration on dipshits who think that game and the NFL is fixed.

In 1993 the NCAA went above & beyond to see that Charlie Ward & Bobby Bowden got to the Orange bowl to play for the hole ball of wax. This was after Fla-st lost at the end of the year to ND & West Virgina & Nebraska were the only two undefeated teams left standing. ND had more right to that match up then Fla-st. What happened in that game to **** the Huskers?
I will go to my grave saying that game was rigged.
Phantom clip called on a punt return for a TD by Cory Dixon. Then to top it off. The Seminoles fumbled at the 2 yard line,Huskers recovered the ball in the endzone & the refs gave Fla-st a TD anyways. :spock:
Lets not forget the phantom pass interference call at the end of the game to set up Fla-st for the game winning fieldgoal

https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/...55303613_n.jpg

Mav 01-07-2014 05:26 AM

The guy badly missed in San Diego. I have no problem with the play call. 5 inches to the damn left.

HMc 01-07-2014 05:49 AM

is 5 seconds long enough to run 2 plays if the first is a 2 step drop with a quick throw to the sideline?

HMc 01-07-2014 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 10352706)
Career long is 54 yards. He's 9 of 17 from 50+ yards. Odds weren't good, even indoors.

The three plays before that is where you might want a do over. Gain 15 yards and you have a make-able FG.

if he doesn't have the distance to make a 58 yarder then not much point in trying. If he can go the distance, I figure it's worth a shot.

McBeard 01-07-2014 07:46 AM

I wouldn't have tried a field goal. I would have tried a play designed for Hemmingway in the slot. The problem with that play was relying on Bowe to make a play in my opinion. After the incomplete pass, I kept thinking about the 4th down drop at the end of the Oakland game a few years ago. Bowe is just not clutch and I would have preferred a play designed for someone else. Not only that, the Colts were obviously looking for a play to Bowe because of all the injuries.

Aspengc8 01-07-2014 08:11 AM

The bubble screen play call that got us the IG call was just bad... bad play call in that situation.

Carlota69 01-07-2014 08:15 AM

Regardless of whatever we should of done, we should, have a kicker that has a leg strong enough to kick a 60 yarder. The fact that he isn't a factor in that situation screams we need a new kicker.

Why Not? 01-07-2014 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlota69 (Post 10352815)
Regardless of whatever we should of done, we should, have a kicker that has a leg strong enough to kick a 60 yarder. The fact that he isn't a factor in that situation screams we need a new kicker.


This

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-07-2014 09:25 AM

You go for it on 4th and Goal from the 1.

philfree 01-07-2014 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlota69 (Post 10352815)
Regardless of whatever we should of done, we should, have a kicker that has a leg strong enough to kick a 60 yarder. The fact that he isn't a factor in that situation screams we need a new kicker.

I wonder what Succops range was. 55 yards?

stevieray 01-07-2014 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlota69 (Post 10352815)
Regardless of whatever we should of done, we should, have a kicker that has a leg strong enough to kick a 60 yarder. The fact that he isn't a factor in that situation screams we need a new kicker.

and how many people can do that? not even realistic.

stevieray 01-07-2014 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 10352927)
You go for it on 4th and Goal from the 1.

yup, that's playing to win..kicking the FG is playing not to lose, or the Chiefs SOP.

Meatloaf 01-07-2014 09:33 AM

Welcome aboard Why Not. I too enjoy the repartee in Chiefs Planet. Of course, one must be prepared to be called out for just about anything. I'll start by suggesting that I back into an Aids tree whilst munching on a poison-infested donut.

As per this thread, I agree whole-heartedly, NO SUCKUP.

rabblerouser 01-07-2014 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveSteam (Post 10352692)
Either way,that ****ing game hurts as bad now as it did Saturday night.

Worse.

I was in shock on Sat Night - Numb...couldn't feel any pain.

Now I'm pissed off and embarrassed.

Carlota69 01-07-2014 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 10352932)
and how many people can do that? not even realistic.

Theres a few in th league, not many tho of course. But we should have a kicker whos longest is more than 54 and stats better than 9-17 at 50+ yards. Someone, when it comes to do or die, becomes a factor, a real thought process, when its more than 55. Instead we have someone we can even trust when its 41 yards.

siberian khatru 01-07-2014 10:11 AM

No, you go for it. Even if you make the FG, it leaves too much time on the clock and you just know the Colts would've easily gone downfield and kicked a winning FG.

The only way the Chiefs salvage that game is if Bowe makes that catch and they run the clock down and kick a FG with no time remaining. Even if Bowe had caught it and scored, we would've lost 52-51.

DaWolf 01-07-2014 10:14 AM

Not with Succop. And it wouldn't have mattered, because Luck would have then had 2 minutes to go win it.

I actually thought we ran a good, aggressive play. And if he comes down with it we run out the clock and kick. But we're the Chiefs, so of course he was going to come down out of bounds...

MahiMike 01-07-2014 10:15 AM

Nope. Our $50M blocker should have put both feet down in bounds.

suzzer99 01-07-2014 10:44 AM

If our $50M blocker doesn't drop an easy 3rd down conversion earlier we might have won as well.

Simplicity 01-07-2014 10:51 AM

Well since we have no athletic WR's... We shoulda taken the field goal.

The Franchise 01-07-2014 10:51 AM

I would have gone for the TD on the 4th and 1 that we had instead of kicking that FG.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 01-07-2014 11:00 AM

I can recall extra long field goal attempts by Succop getting blocked before. His kickoffs are not the greatest. With the Colts luck Saturday, it would have been run back.

ShortRoundChief 01-07-2014 11:40 AM

I read the title and was almost ready to bust out an Eminem rap.

ShortRoundChief 01-07-2014 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrtonsPiercedTaint (Post 10353097)
I can recall extra long field goal attempts by Succop getting blocked before. His kickoffs are not the greatest. With the Colts luck Saturday, it would have been run back.

If only the world weren't flat and we could kick it from a top the lofty hill that the NFL sits the Colts upon.

Carlota69 01-07-2014 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrtonsPiercedTaint (Post 10353097)
I can recall extra long field goal attempts by Succop getting blocked before. His kickoffs are not the greatest. With the Colts luck Saturday, it would have been run back.

Exactly my point. We dont have a good kicker. We cant even trust him from 41 out, much less from 60. We need a kicker, that if push cme to shove, we could at least consider trying a long ass FG

Why Not? 01-07-2014 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 10352938)
Welcome aboard Why Not. I too enjoy the repartee in Chiefs Planet. Of course, one must be prepared to be called out for just about anything. I'll start by suggesting that I back into an Aids tree whilst munching on a poison-infested donut.

As per this thread, I agree whole-heartedly, NO SUCKUP.


Thanks man. And yes I am prepared to be told to DIAF

siberian khatru 01-07-2014 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 10352938)
Welcome aboard Why Not. I too enjoy the repartee in Chiefs Planet. Of course, one must be prepared to be called out for just about anything. I'll start by suggesting that I back into an Aids tree whilst munching on a poison-infested donut.

ANTI-FREEZE soaked donut, you stupid ****ing cockswallower.

Meatloaf 01-07-2014 11:50 AM

My bad.

siberian khatru 01-07-2014 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 10353216)
My bad.

You'll learn. :D

ShortRoundChief 01-07-2014 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlota69 (Post 10353211)
Exactly my point. We dont have a good kicker. We cant even trust him from 41 out, much less from 60. We need a kicker, that if push cme to shove, we could at least consider trying a long ass FG

Succop ain't Elliot bad. He's somewhat reliable, kicker's miss. Heck, he didn't miss one all day.

The Franchise 01-07-2014 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlota69 (Post 10353211)
Exactly my point. We dont have a good kicker. We cant even trust him from 41 out, much less from 60. We need a kicker, that if push cme to shove, we could at least consider trying a long ass FG

There aren't a lot of kickers that you can trust from 60 yards out.

Titty Meat 01-07-2014 12:25 PM

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/0Ogs_NsXh58" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Rain Man 01-07-2014 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10353081)
I would have gone for the TD on the 4th and 1 that we had instead of kicking that FG.

In the dark prison of our despair, that decision is a really big aggressive guy in the shower.

Why Not? 01-07-2014 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10353233)
There aren't a lot of kickers that you can trust from 60 yards out.

I think her point for the most part is that there are many K's you would at least say "F it, let's try a long kick". With Succop it's not even considered

Carlota69 01-07-2014 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 10353313)
I think her point for the most part is that there are many K's you would at least say "F it, let's try a long kick". With Succop it's not even considered

Exactly!! Thank you.

lcarus 01-07-2014 01:00 PM

With Succop we'd be lucky as hell if he could connect from 53/54. 60? Almost impossible.

Amnorix 01-07-2014 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 10352681)
I wondered the same. Sure it was a low percentage kick but there was nothing to lose by trying it.


Well, Alabama Auburn proved that isn't quite true. If you really don't think he has the leg for it, then it's a real risk.

The field goal protection team is basically two specialists in the holder and kicker, a bunch of fatties to block, and not much else. It's not exactly the guys you'd want on the field to defend a kick return, which is sort of what you'd be dealing with...

Amnorix 01-07-2014 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10353233)
There aren't a lot of kickers that you can trust from 60 yards out.


You don't need to trust him. You need to think "the odds of a kick from 60 are better than the odds of converting 4th and 11".

But the time left on the clock is also important, as others have pointed out. Leaving the Colts with 2 minutes there isn't likely to end well...

Amnorix 01-07-2014 01:18 PM

All that said, you guys might look for a really good kicker in the 4th or 5th round of the draft maybe. Guys like that are a very nice bonus for a team that is on the rise. They can affect field position on kickoffs and get the 3 when you need the damn 3.

McBeard 01-07-2014 01:39 PM

Succop has been pretty solid over the years. I think you gotta stay with a kicker through the tough times. Blair Walsh was terrible at Georgia in his senior year and look at him now. Succop really only had one bad one all year. I'd bring in some competition but that's about it. You aren't going to find much better.

ClevelandBronco 01-07-2014 02:20 PM

So if you had one more chance
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 10352681)
I wondered the same. Sure it was a low percentage kick but there was nothing to lose by trying it.

I wondered about the reason for not attempting the FG before halftime as well. Perhaps it had something to do with wanting to preserve whatever fragile confidence Succop had reacquired after the problems he had the week before.

Rausch 01-07-2014 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 10353367)
You don't need to trust him. You need to think "the odds of a kick from 60 are better than the odds of converting 4th and 11".

But, they're not...

lcarus 01-07-2014 02:25 PM

We missed the 4th down completion by 2 or 3 inches. Succop would have missed a near 60 yard FG by a lot more than that.

TEX 01-07-2014 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 10353332)
With Succop we'd be lucky as hell if he could connect from 53/54. 60? Almost impossible.

This

BlackHelicopters 01-07-2014 03:43 PM

No


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.