Ray Rice using unconventional ways to improve YPC
 

<iframe id="kaltura_player_1392834949" height="360" width="640" style="border: 0px solid #ffffff;" src="http://cdnapi.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/wid/0_tfm58d8q/uiconf_id/6740162/st_cache/53814?&amp;">Unfortunately your browser does not support IFrames.</iframe>
<div style="text-align:left;font-size:x-small;margin-top:0;">
<a href="http://www.tmz.com/videos/0_c5nk3w3n">Ray Rice -- Dragging Unconscious Fiancee ... After Alleged Mutual Attack</a>

did this happen at bannister mall or the country club plaza?

Rice DOES know that the fumblerooski is an illegal play, right?

He knocks his fiance the **** out, tries to drag her out of the ****ing elevator, and cover it up like it's nothing.

And a thread about hog jizz gets more play?

I am disappoint, CP.

I heard he knocked her out because she was nagging him about how he sucked really hard in fantasy football this year.

I wish she would have knocked him out for his shitty fantasy numbers this year. I had him on my team this year.

Did he use too many roofies or something? What's the story?

OJ killed a woman. This ain't shit.

OJ was found innocent by a jury of his peers.

Verbal altercation, fiance spit on Rice, Rice got steamed and knocked her out.

Knocked her out..... That'll teach her!

Wow. I wouldn't have thought he was big enough to do something like that.

It's safe to say it was an uppercut.

i prefer fried

Yep

Damn. ****ing cleaned her clock.

Hey if my jury was 24 year old white guys trying to make it to the middle class I'd be innocent everytime!

Then you'd be innocent like OJ was.

Life would be good. And my local dumbass would be spayed or neutered.

He was found not guilty. There's a bit of a difference.

But in fairness hog jizz had a much better year than Ray Rice

Roasted.

Will Rice even get suspended?

He was found not guilty. Big difference from that and innocent. Do you really believe he didn't murder anyone?

Dammit, I guess I should have read further in the thread.

So was George Zimmerman. You good with that?

Sure. I said from the beginning that the prosecutor reached on the murder charge. I bet he would have gotten a manslaughter conviction.

Not guilty = innocent of the crime that he was accused of.

Not guilty=not proven guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was accused of.


Not that he was innocent.

not guilty
phrase of guilty
1.
innocent, esp. of a formal charge.

It would appear that the video is no longer available.

You are one ****ed up dipshit.

Yes, I am aware of the meaning of not and the meaning of guilty. Here's the legal definition there buddy.

not guilty n. 1) plea of a person who claims not to have committed the crime of which he/she is accused, made in court when arraigned (first brought before a judge) or at a later time set by court. The choices of what one can plea are: guilty, not guilty, no contest, not guilty by reason of insanity, or incompetent to stand trial. 2) verdict after trial by judge sitting without a jury or by jury (unanimous decision in all but two states, which allow a verdict by only 10 of the jurors), stating that the prosecution has not proved the defendant guilty of crime or that it believes the accused person was insane at the time crime was committed. The accused cannot be tried for again for the crime charged. (See: plea, arraignment, not guilty by reason of insanity)


Seriously, I know it is a stretch but could you at least try to stop being a ****ing moron?

Answer my question you simple son of a bitch. Do you think that OJ killed anyone?

You can point out where I'm incorrect if you are so inclined.

What I think is irrelevant. OJ was tried by a jury of his peers and was found not guilty of the crime of murder.

Not guilty is synonymous with innocent.

Not guilty is also a legal phrase. One that I just provided the definition to you free of charge.

Dumb****.

You do realize that even though he was found not guilty that that doesn't mean he isn't a murdering piece of shit? Not guilty does not equal innocent.

If a prosecutor fails to establish culpability for the crime, then the defendant is innocent.

Orenthal practically confessed in the never-published book. If you think he's innocent then... I'm not sure what to say for you.

Actually, not guilty exactly means innocent.

Again, what I think is irrelevant. He was found innocent in a court of law.

Nope.

The only thing Ray Rice is guilty of is knowing how to have a good time.

/Darren Sharper

I've already provided a definition that backs my assertion.

You, otoh, are apparently comfortable redefining words as you see fit.

Oh my God you have got to be the stupidest ****ing troll in the land of trolls. So if I shoot a troll in the ****ing face and they arrest me, try me, and, due to a lack of sufficient evidence that doesn't prove without a shadow of a doubt that I did it, (despite the fact that I did) am declared innocent that means I am innocent?


Seriously?

In the eyes of the law, you would be innocent.

No, you are just too stupid to read your own definition. Being found not guilty of a formal charge does not make someone morally innocent. In other words, you can be found not guilty even though you did in fact commit the crime.

So why bother going around prancing about the verdict? No one was disputing what the verdict was. They are talking about what the truth is.

The truth according to the jury was that OJ was innocent.

Your dumbass is flipping back and forth between the common sense definition and the legal definition to suit your purpose to whichever post you're responding to.

Common sense: not guilty-opposite of guilty (innocent)
Legal definition: not proven guilty

So which is it? Earlier I said that he was not proven guilty and you disagreed.

You should learn how to read better.

I'm not flipping. You are drunk and trying to play the semantics game like patty or donger and you're not very good at it.

KC native and his gerbil fetish went horribly wrong when one came up missing.

You're not very good at this either. Implied gay jokes are lame. Congrats on being lame.

And the underappreciated post of the night goes to...

Awwwwww where did you go guise?

http://static4.wikia.nocookie.net/__..._troll_gif.gif
http://static4.wikia.nocookie.net/__..._troll_gif.gif

http://static4.wikia.nocookie.net/__..._troll_gif.gif

Never said you were ghey, but you might want to get that looked at? :shrug:

Not even drinking. I am certain that you would make more sense if I was.



I guess all that guilt was pretty hard to take for those that have spent decades in jail only to be exonerated later on.

I'm not really clear, because you're a dumbass, but it seems to me that your definition of innocent and guilt depends entirely on a verdict.

http://img.mixedmartialarts.com/meth...h-fail-gif.gif
Congrats on sticking with the unfunny joke. You are still lame.

The verdict is really the only definition that matters.

I guess, since the system is infallible and all.

Wondering why we even waste our time with appeals courts and all. I guess if you're proven guilty then you must be.

Where did I say the system was infallible?

Feisty D bag, good luck with that, I'm amazed you made it this long, carry on.

I hope this is supposed to be a stevieray impersonation. He misuses ellipses though, not commas.

It is purely my assumption based on the fact that you're basing your entire belief system of guilt and innocence on a system, so that system must be infallible or else you'd be a moron.

Well, it's not a very good assumption.

So what you are saying is that your belief of innocence or guilt is determined purely by the prosecutions ability to prove guilt in a system that you admit has flaws?

No. That is what you're trying to say that I'm saying.

I've meet stevieray, good dude, you couldn't hold his jock strap.

He's not very smart and he's a very judgmental person. You must have low standards.

Did you not say that a verdicts determination is the only one that matters?

It is. That doesn't mean I think the system is infallible. Nor does it imply that I always agree with it.

If I have low standards and don't care for you? Well, I guess that says it all.

Yeah, it's like arguing with a wall...

"What the system says is all that matters. However, I don't always agree with them but I'll argue on a message board for hours trying to prove that they are right."

I'm not trying to prove anything.

Whose version of innocent means you keep your freedom? Yours or a court of law?

It doesn't really say anything. You're not very smart. Birds of a feather and all.

Waste of breath and key strokes, his schtick was old as soon as I saw his stupid avatar, over compensate much?

Why do you think my avatar actually represents anything about me?