ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Terez Paylor mocks us a CB (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282974)

RunKC 04-13-2014 11:47 AM

Terez Paylor mocks us a CB
 
1. Houston Texans: DE Jadeveon Clowney, 6-5, 266, South Carolina

If the Texans don’t force a quarterback here, they’ll take the best player on the board. That’s Clowney, one of the most talented defensive ends to enter the draft in a long time.

2. St. Louis Rams: LT Greg Robinson, 6-5, 332, Auburn

With Clowney off the board, Sammy Watkins, Khalil Mack and Greg Robinson are widely considered to be the elite prospects remaining. Watkins will be tempting — despite taking four receivers in the top four rounds since coach Jeff Fisher took over, they still don’t have a clear No. 1 — but the Rams just signed Kenny Britt, so they do have some flexibility here.

Left tackle Jake Long is rehabbing after tearing his ACL and MCL late last season, so Robinson — a mauler in the running game who flashes great potential in pass protection — offers insurance in the short-term. If Long is ready to go this season, Robinson could also step in and be a dominant left guard as he refines his technique in preparation for a future move to left tackle.

3. Jacksonville Jaguars: WR Sammy Watkins, 6-1, 211, Clemson

If the Jaguars aren’t in love with any of the top quarterbacks, they might just pick one in the second round and go with Watkins, an established playmaker with blazing speed who has all the tools needed to be a top-shelf receiver in the National Football League. He blows by cornerbacks, tracks the ball well and also has the ability to contribute as a returner.

4. Cleveland Browns: QB Blake Bortles, 6-5, 232, Central Florida

The Texans’ and Jaguars’ decisions to pass on a quarterback benefits the Browns, who now have their choice of the top three prospects at the position. Of the three, I have them going with Bortles, a late-riser who possesses prototypical size and plus intangibles. He also excels at running bootlegs and playaction, which will fit well in Kyle Shanahan’s version of the West Coast offense. Johnny Manziel or Teddy Bridgewater could also be options here.

5. Oakland Raiders: OLB Khalil Mack, 6-2, 251, Buffalo

The Raiders are trying to contend this year, and Mack is a plug-and-play type who will immediately help the defense with his versatility and ability to rush the passer. Mack can help out at defensive end, where LaMarr Woodley, Justin Tuck and Kevin Burnett are all 29 or older. He can also help out as a conventional outside linebacker in the Raiders’ 4-3 scheme, though 2013 third-round pick Sio Moore flashed potential there, too. There are a lot of bodies up front for the Raiders but it’s hard to pass on a blue-chip talent like Mack.

6. Atlanta Falcons: OT Jake Matthews, 6-5, 308, Texas A&M

The Falcons have to do a better job protecting quarterback Matt Ryan — the guy was sacked a career-high 44 times last season. Rectifying this starts with fortifying the edges, where tackles Sam Baker and Lamar Holmes struggled mightily last season. There’s no doubt what Matthews can do; the guy is a plug-and-play tackle at either left tackle or right tackle, a rock-solid option with fantastic bloodlines (he’s the son of Hall of Famer Bruce Matthews).

7. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: WR Mike Evans, 6-5, 231, Texas A&M

With the recent trade of Mike Williams, the Bucs could easily scoop up a wide receiver here. New quarterback Josh McCown thrived in Chicago with two big receivers in Brandon Marshall and Alshon Jeffery, and the Bucs have a chance to recreate some of that magic by teaming up Evans — a massive receiver with strong ball skills —with another big, established playmaker in Vincent Jackson.

8. Minnesota Vikings: QB Johnny Manziel, 6-1, 207, Texas A&M

New offensive coordinator Norv Turner could use a long-term option at quarterback who is better than Matt Cassel, and there are no shortage of options still on the board. The Vikings could go with Bridgewater, Manziel or even David Carr, but Manziel has the arm strength and competiveness to make Turner’s vertical offense sing.

9. Buffalo Bills: TE Eric Ebron, 6-4, 250, North Carolina

The Bills could use a right tackle, so if Matthews falls here, he could be the pick. But after investing a first-round pick in quarterback E.J. Manuel last year, the Bills may give their young quarterback a weapon in the athletic Ebron, who is the draft’s best prospect at tight end.

10. Detroit Lions: OLB Anthony Barr, 6-4, 255, UCLA

The Lions wouldn’t mind taking Evans if he was still on the board, but Barr is a nice consolation prize. As a former fullback, he lacks polish and is still developing his football instincts, but his combination of size, speed, burst and collegiate production makes him an intriguing fit in Detroit’s attacking 4-3 defense. He’s a high-upside prospect worth taking a chance on.

11. Tennessee Titans: QB Teddy Bridgewater, 6-2, 214, Louisville

The Titans aren’t expected to pick up the option on Jake Locker’s contract, which means he’s essentially on a one-year audition in Tennessee. Enter Bridgewater, whose stock has fallen since a disappointing pro day but still has the pocket presence and smarts to be a starting quarterback in the NFL. There are some questions about his thin frame, but in this scenario, Bridgewater could sit for a year and develop behind Locker before taking over in 2015.

12. New York Giants: OT Taylor Lewan, 6-7, 309, Michigan

The Giants could use an upgrade at left tackle, so while the Giants rarely spend high picks on linemen, the chance to add a top-10 talent in Lewan — at a position of need, no less — could prove to be too tempting to pass up.

13. St. Louis Rams: CB Justin Gilbert, 6-0, 202, Oklahoma State

The Rams need help at safety, but their starters at the position last season — Rodney McLeod and T.J. McDonald — are only 23 years old. They should get better. So instead of safety, the Rams go with Gilbert, a player whose speed and ball skills potentially give coach Jeff Fisher and new defensive coordinator Gregg Williams another chess piece for their attacking defense.

14. Chicago Bears: DT Aaron Donald, 6-1, 285, Pittsburgh

Donald is small for a defensive lineman, but there’s no doubting his production, quickness or motor. This guy has checked all the boxes during the pre-draft period and is an ideal fit as a three-technique defensive tackle to replace Henry Melton, who bolted for Dallas this offseason.

15. Pittsburgh Steelers: CB Darqueze Dennard, 5-11, 199, Michigan State

Dennard is an aggressive, physical press-man corner who fits the profile of the type of player defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau likes at the position.

16. Dallas Cowboys: S Ha’Sean Clinton-Dix, 6-1, 218, Alabama

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones loves big names, and Clinton-Dix fits the bill, thanks to in large part to his amusing nickname (which is Ha Ha). But the Cowboys also need plenty of help at safety, and while Clinton-Dix isn’t elite in any area, he’s competent in several, which makes him a plug-and-player for Jones.

17. Baltimore Ravens: OT Zack Martin, 6-4, 308, Notre Dame

General manager Ozzie Newsome has an eye for talent and often leans toward taking the best player on the board. Fortunately for him, Martin is still out there. He’s smart and versatile and should be able to step right in at right tackle and contribute. As an added bonus, he also plays center and guard.

18. New York Jets: WR Odell Beckham Jr., 5-11, 198, Louisiana State

Brandin Cooks and Marqise Lee are also options here, but Beckham is bigger than Cooks and doesn’t have Lee’s injury woes. Beckham’s ability to stretch the field, play inside or outside and contribute on special teams makes him a potential contributor from day one.

19. Miami Dolphins: LB C.J. Mosley, 6-2, 234, Alabama

New Dolphins general manager Dennis Hickey is reportedly a fan of taking the best player available, and Mosley — a smart three-down linebacker with excellent intangibles — fits the bill. He also fills a need at inside linebacker.

20. Arizona Cardinals: OLB Ryan Shazier, 6-1, 237, Ohio State

Shazier is a nice fit for the Cardinals, a run-and-hit outside linebacker who is coming off a strong junior season in which he finished as the Big Ten’s leading tackler. His size is a concern, but he covers a ton of ground (he ran a 4.4 40 during his pro day) and the Cardinals have the size up front to protect him.

21. Green Bay Packers: S Calvin Pryor, 5-11, 207, Louisville

The Packers get a break and select perhaps the most imposing hitter in the 2014 draft class. Pryor is a physical player who will fit right in next to Morgan Burnett in the Packers’ secondary.

22. Philadelphia Eagles: WR Marqise Lee, 6-0, 192, Southern California

If anybody knows what Lee can do, it’s Philly coach Chip Kelly. He coached against him in 2011 and 2012, back when Kelly was at Oregon and Lee was ripping up Pac-12 defenses. Lee’s durability is a concern, but he is a natural playmaker with the speed and talent to stretch the field the way Kelly likes.

23. Chiefs: CB Bradley Roby, 5-11, 194, Ohio State`

At this range, the Chiefs might be tempted to look at Zack Martin, who can play guard, and big-play receivers like Marqise Lee and Brandin Cooks. But in Roby, they can also take a feisty, physical and fluid athlete who was inconsistent as a junior but was once regarded as a top-15 pick. He’s a tad shorter than the Chiefs general manager John Dorsey typically likes — just a tick under 6-feet tall — but he does have long arms and tends to play bigger than his size.

The Chiefs have already given big-time money to Sean Smith and Brandon Flowers, but for a team in the AFC West, the road to the Super Bowl leads through Denver and star quarterback Peyton Manning, and the Chiefs’ two losses to the Broncos — not to mention their playoff loss to Indianapolis — showed you can never have enough cornerbacks.

Adding Roby to the mix, along with Marcus Cooper and Chris Owens, gives the Chiefs at least five playable cornerbacks. It also provides valuable insurance at the position in case the team decides to save money next year by cutting Smith or Flowers.

24. Cincinnati Bengals: DE Kony Ealy, 6-4, 273, Missouri

The Bengals could use a little more juice on their defensive line, especially after the free-agent departure of defensive end Michael Johnson. Ealy has the tools to be a good professional defensive end.

25. San Diego Chargers: NT Louis Nix III, 6-2, 331, Notre Dame

San Diego is reportedly comfortable with Sean Lissemore at nose tackle, but Nix is a massive space eater who fits the bill as a run-stuffer in the Chargers’ 3-4 defense.

26. Cleveland Browns: CB Kyle Fuller, 6-0, 190, Virginia Tech

Fuller’s stock has been rising. He has a good football pedigree — two of his brothers have played in the NFL while his youngest brother now plays at Virginia Tech — and he has the talent to step right in next to star cornerback Joe Haden and solidify the position for years to come.

27. New Orleans Saints: OLB Dee Ford, 6-2, 252, Auburn

Ford is a pass rusher, though and through, and defensive coordinator Rob Ryan knows exactly how to use guys like that in his 3-4 defense.

28. Carolina Panthers: WR Brandin Cooks, 5-9, 189, Oregon State

After the team parted ways with Ted Ginn and Steve Smith, finding a target for star quarterback Cam Newton should be a priority. Cooks is a player whose strong pre-draft workouts are backed up by his junior year film, so he could very easily go before this point. If he lasts to No. 28, consider it a steal for the Panthers.

29. New England Patriots: DT Ra’Shede Hageman, 6-5, 318, Minnesota

The Patriots’ starting defensive tackles are well over 30, and while a handful of young backups played well last year, none of them have the athleticm and talent of Hageman. He’s raw, but if anybody can help him reach his potential, it’s Bill Belichick.

30. San Francisco 49ers: CB Jason Verrett, 5-9, 189, Texas Christian

Verrett is small, so long-term durability is a concern. But the 49ers need quality depth at cornerback, and Verrett has the speed, aggressiveness and ball skills to contribute immediately as a nickel corner.

31. Denver Broncos: OLB Jeremiah Attoachu, 6-3, 252, Georgia Tech

Attoachu is a pass-rusher with a chance to develop into a long-term starter. Given Von Miller’s off-field troubles and DeMarcus Ware’s age (31), it certainly wouldn’t hurt to add a little edge-rushing insurance.

32. Seattle Seahawks: DT Stephon Tuitt, 6-5, 304, Notre Dame

The Seahawks lost some key members of their defensive line this offseason, but Tuitt can step right in and contribute immediately. He can anchor against the run and he also displayed pass-rushing production in college. If he’s over the injuries that slowed him down last year, he could be a steal.

To reach Terez A. Paylor, call 816-234-4489 or send email to tpaylor@kcstar.com. Follow him at twitter.com/TerezPaylor.


Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2014/04/12...#storylink=cpy

TambaBerry 04-13-2014 11:50 AM

That is the position i want the chiefs to pick but not the guy I want them to draft.

kccrow 04-13-2014 11:54 AM

I'm an OSU fan I can say I far and away prefer Kyle Fuller to Roby. Not that Roby sucks, but I don't like him in this defense all that much.

The Franchise 04-13-2014 11:56 AM

**** that. You draft Cooks.

RunKC 04-13-2014 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 10559341)
I'm an OSU fan I can say I far and away prefer Kyle Fuller to Roby. Not that Roby sucks, but I don't like him in this defense all that much.

But we already have a Kyle Fuller type in Sean Smith.

I agree 100% with Terez that this D needs a legit burner with talent at CB. Flowers and Smith both got their asses kicked by fast WR's last year.

But honestly I like Jason Verrett for this role far more.

Sfeihc 04-13-2014 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10559345)
**** that. You draft Cooks.

If the CHIEFS pass on Cooks, we riot!

O.city 04-13-2014 12:02 PM

Would rather have Attachou cooks or Hageman over a CB.

I'm more of the opinion that if you get competent safety play our CBs aren't a problem.

RunKC 04-13-2014 12:04 PM

I can honestly see Dorsey drafting Roby or Verrett in the first and a WR in the 3rd.

This defense needs a good slot CB so incredibly bad. Flowers is not good in that role at all, and if you think he is, go watch the Denver game in Denver where Welker constantly beat him with his side-to-side speed.

But based on Dorsey's comments on the WR position and the HEAVY attention to CB's, I think we're taking CB first.

If this happens, I will be very curious to see what WR Dorsey thinks is valuable later.

O.city 04-13-2014 12:05 PM

Heavy attention to CBs?

O.city 04-13-2014 12:07 PM

If you take a CB, what do you do with those on the roster?

RealSNR 04-13-2014 12:07 PM

I would applaud this type of innovative pick usually, but not when Cooks is still on the board.

Dumb pick.

RealSNR 04-13-2014 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559372)
If you take a CB, what do you do with those on the roster?

Put them on the field? :shrug:

It's meant as a safe way to transition away from Brandon Flowers and Sean Smith, which this team does need to think about. I'm a fan of Marcus Cooper, yes, but he's not enough, and still has a lot of learning to do. We need more time with him.

RunKC 04-13-2014 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559358)
Would rather have Attachou cooks or Hageman over a CB.

I'm more of the opinion that if you get competent safety play our CBs aren't a problem.

Attachou and Hageman make no difference on this team vs the Chargers or Broncos. None at all.

Manning will do the quick 3 step drops that killed us last year and Rivers will copy it like he did last year, which killed us too.

Our CB's got abused last year. Remember Decker owning Flowers deep last year at Arrowhead? Remember Welker abusing Flowers on the quick slants in Denver last year? Remember Hopkins owning Smith at Arrowhead last year? Hell do you remember Flowers getting owned vs Jacoby Ford in Oakland a few years ago because he was too slow?

Yes we need safety help, but it won't help if these teams use the 4 WR sets they did before. It's impossible for safeties to cover all 4 consistently. At some point you need the CB's to do their jobs.

O.city 04-13-2014 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10559379)
Put them on the field? :shrug:

It's meant as a safe way to transition away from Brandon Flowers and Sean Smith, which this team does need to think about. I'm a fan of Marcus Cooper, yes, but he's not enough, and still has a lot of learning to do. We need more time with him.

It's forward thinking, sure.

But I think it's a little soon to write off Flowers and Smith.

I'm not opposed to drafting a CB early, but I'd rather take them later and develop them.

RealSNR 04-13-2014 12:16 PM

In any case, it's a dumb idea to take a CB with Cooks still available. And I might even extend that to Attaouchu and Ealy.

All three are far better players than any of the CBs not named Justin Gilbert or Darqueze Dennard

O.city 04-13-2014 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10559385)
Attachou and Hageman make no difference on this team vs the Chargers or Broncos. None at all.

Manning will do the quick 3 step drops that killed us last year and Rivers will copy it like he did last year, which killed us too.

Our CB's got abused last year. Remember Welker owning Flowers deep last year at Arrowhead? Remember Hopkins owning Smith at Arrowhead last year? Hell do you remember Flowers getting owned vs Jacoby Ford in Oakland a few years ago because he was too slow?

Yes we need safety help, but it won't help if these teams use the 4 WR sets they did before. It's impossible for safeties to cover all 4 consistently. At some point you need the CB's to do their jobs.

Every situation you just described can be attributed to no safety help. Without knowing the coverage, it's impossible to evaluate corner play, for the most part.

It's not impossible when teams go 4 wide. At all. With proper play recognition, paired with knowledge of high used route combinations, it's not.

By the time we got to the chargers a broncos, we had already changed our defensive scheme in terms of coverage to compensate for teams killing our safeties.

The biggest problem against the broncos we had wasn't guys getting burned consistently, it was that we didn't tackle worth a shit once they caught it.

O.city 04-13-2014 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10559395)
In any case, it's a dumb idea to take a CB with Cooks still available. And I might even extend that to Attaouchu and Ealy.

All three are far better players than any of the CBs not named Justin Gilbert or Darqueze Dennard

I agree.

Mr_Tomahawk 04-13-2014 12:19 PM

I agree that we need to address tour D with our first pick...but this wouldn't have been my pick.

O.city 04-13-2014 12:20 PM

For that matter, I don't think a rookie cb is going to help much next year against the broncos or chargers either

RunKC 04-13-2014 12:20 PM

I would love Cooks, but I feel like Reid has some other guys in mind later on that he thinks will be productive.

Either way, I think it's WR or CB at 23.

O.city 04-13-2014 12:21 PM

It's still a month away, I don't know that they have much f an idea yet

O.city 04-13-2014 12:23 PM

I don't think you go in thinking its gotta be a certain position.

With this draft, get your 5 or 6 you love and just sit and see what happens

RunKC 04-13-2014 12:23 PM

Another guy they could take is Phillip Gaines in rd 3. He's got that speed and he's got some room to grow.
But then again, guys like that don't last long. Wouldn't be surprised if he's gone.

O.city 04-13-2014 12:25 PM

Guys like Gaines, Desir, etc will likely be around later too.

There's some real sleepers at CB in this draft, which is why unless Dennard falls, I'd wait

The Franchise 04-13-2014 12:27 PM

One of the top 3 CBs fall? Sure. If not....****ing take Cooks.

Mr_Tomahawk 04-13-2014 12:27 PM

Go pass rusher in the 1st, CB in the 3rd.

Andy has the ability of making a mid-late rnd WR into a stud.

Nightfyre 04-13-2014 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 10559451)
Go pass rusher in the 1st, CB in the 3rd.

Andy has the ability of making a mid-late rnd WR into a stud.

There are going to be amazing talents at WR in the middle rounds.

TambaBerry 04-13-2014 12:29 PM

Why do you guys love Cooks so much? I mean he is ok, but its not like he is that much better.

RunKC 04-13-2014 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559437)
Guys like Gaines, Desir, etc will likely be around later too.

There's some real sleepers at CB in this draft, which is why unless Dennard falls, I'd wait

This is what people have been saying about WR for months.

The Franchise 04-13-2014 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dingleberry (Post 10559459)
Why do you guys love Cooks so much? I mean he is ok, but its not like he is that much better.

Lolwut?

Much better than what exactly?

O.city 04-13-2014 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10559477)
This is what people have been saying about WR for months.

I think it's different with wrs because while it is a deep class, there's a talent drop outside the top 5.

With cb, other than the top 2, I don't think there's as much of a drop.

TambaBerry 04-13-2014 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10559485)
Lolwut?

Much better than what exactly?

Then the other options that will be there at 23.

RunKC 04-13-2014 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559489)
I think it's different with wrs because while it is a deep class, there's a talent drop outside the top 5.

With cb, other than the top 2, I don't think there's as much of a drop.

I could see that being the case.

I've said this for weeks. I want our first 2 picks to be CB and WR. Don't care which round you choose to draft one before the other, as long as they are the first 2 taken.

Direckshun 04-13-2014 12:46 PM

I love how he argues that the Chiefs "could" be tempted by Zack Martin, then drops him out of the 1st round entirely.

"The Chiefs might consider reaching for a 2nd round guard."

Thanks Terez.

kccrow 04-13-2014 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10559349)
But we already have a Kyle Fuller type in Sean Smith.

I agree 100% with Terez that this D needs a legit burner with talent at CB. Flowers and Smith both got their asses kicked by fast WR's last year.

But honestly I like Jason Verrett for this role far more.


If you call Demaryius Thomas, Eric Decker, Dez Bryant, and the like "fast," then ok. I don't disagree that Flowers and Smith got beat a lot last season. I especially don't like Smith that much. Fuller is faster than all of those receivers and he's faster than Brandon Flowers and moves better than Sean Smith. I consider Fuller the 2nd best CB in the draft after Gilbert. He's pretty legit and I would love to see KC draft him, but the situation at WR is dire in my opinion. Eventually you have to add a playmaker and if Cooks is there I find it hard to pass on that type of player.

As for Roby, there is a difference between cocky and confident to me and Roby is cocky. While he broke up a lot of passes, he arrived at the last second far too often and got away with holding and face guarding a lot that he won't get away with in the NFL. If he refines his game though, he could be outstanding. He has got in a little trouble in Columbus too, but nothing too overwhelming.

Nightfyre 04-13-2014 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10559525)
I love how he argues that the Chiefs "could" be tempted by Zack Martin, then drops him out of the 1st round entirely.

"The Chiefs might consider reaching for a 2nd round guard."

Thanks Terez.

He went 17 to the Ravens. Not that I think this mock is any good.

RealSNR 04-13-2014 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dingleberry (Post 10559459)
Why do you guys love Cooks so much? I mean he is ok, but its not like he is that much better.

2013 Biletnikoff winner and AP All-American selection. First team All-Pac12.

He set single season conference records in receiving yards (1730) and receptions (128). He had the most receiving yards and the 2nd most receptions in the FBS.

He set those records in a PRO STYLE offense, too. This wasn't some pop-gun bullshit where the system often props up most of the player's production.

He did that with speed, agility, and beautiful route-running. And it wasn't like he was in a powerhouse talent team. He played opposite speedster Markus Wheaton in 2012, and when he left, Cooks took over and dominated, saying, "I'M the real receiver."

Check out his combine numbers, too. 4.33 in the 40. 3.81 in the 20-yard shuttle. 6.76 in the 3-cone, which is a pretty good mark to have in an important drill.

He's not tall, but he's not exactly a midget, either. We're not getting Dexter McCluster here. We're getting a legit receiver with soft hands who will hit the ground running for any complex route concepts you throw at him. And just look at some of his highlights the way he runs and makes plays with the football after the catch.

He's stunningly perfect for Reid. I was high on Odell Beckham and still am, but in the last couple weeks, I've changed my mind in terms of who is better. It's Cooks.

O.city 04-13-2014 01:16 PM

I think Cooks has ceiling limitations that Beckham doesn't though

The Franchise 04-13-2014 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559643)
I think Cooks has ceiling limitations that Beckham doesn't though

Those being what exactly?

RealSNR 04-13-2014 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559643)
I think Cooks has ceiling limitations that Beckham doesn't though

His size?

There are receivers shorter and scrawnier than him in the NFL who are incredible pros. That's because they know how to make their athleticism work for them.

Cooks is absolutely that kind of receiver.

O.city 04-13-2014 01:27 PM

There are, but not many.

I think he could struggle against the press, which isn't something he can learn, but I think Beckham has a legit chance to be a #1 guy. Cooks does as well, I just think Beckham has more.

The Franchise 04-13-2014 01:29 PM

Because he's never seen the press before?

Beckham wasn't consistent all season like Cooks was.

Saccopoo 04-13-2014 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559643)
I think Cooks has ceiling limitations that Beckham doesn't though

And I think that Moncrief goes above Beckham with those non-limiters as Beckham does Cooks.

Those limiters being size, arm length, verticality, speed, blocking ability, etc.

All three are exceptionally solid WR prospects, run solid routes, do the little things, but when you consider that:

Cooks: 5'10", 189 lbs., 30 3/4" arms, 9 5/8" hands, 4.33 40, 36.0" vert, 120" broad
Beckham: 5'11", 195 lbs., 32 3/4" arms, 10" hands, 4.43 40, 38.5" vert, 122" broad
Moncrief: 6'2 1/2", 221 lbs., 32 3/8" arms, 9 1/8" hands, 4.40 40, 39.5" vert, 132" broad

Beckham is bigger than Cooks with better explosiveness, Moncrief is bigger than Beckham with more explosiveness.

All three run great routes. All three block well. All three jet off the line.

What's the difference? What's the "limitations" on one versus the other?

All things being relatively equal, I take the guy who's 6'2 1/2", 221 lbs., versus the 5'10", 189 lb. guy because he's going to be able to be more physical, take more punishment, be more effective in blocking, etc.

Mr_Tomahawk 04-13-2014 01:34 PM

http://usatq.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/kony-ealy2.jpg

And be done with it...

O.city 04-13-2014 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10559683)
Because he's never seen the press before?

Beckham wasn't consistent all season like Cooks was.

He struggled against it at times though.

O.city 04-13-2014 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10559704)
And I think that Moncrief goes above Beckham with those non-limiters as Beckham does Cooks.

Those limiters being size, arm length, verticality, speed, blocking ability, etc.

All three are exceptionally solid WR prospects, run solid routes, do the little things, but when you consider that:

Cooks: 5'10", 189 lbs., 30 3/4" arms, 9 5/8" hands, 4.33 40, 36.0" vert, 120" broad
Beckham: 5'11", 195 lbs., 32 3/4" arms, 10" hands, 4.43 40, 38.5" vert, 122" broad
Moncrief: 6'2 1/2", 221 lbs., 32 3/8" arms, 9 1/8" hands, 4.40 40, 39.5" vert, 132" broad

Beckham is bigger than Cooks with better explosiveness, Moncrief is bigger than Beckham with more explosiveness.

All three run great routes. All three block well. All three jet off the line.

What's the difference? What's the "limitations" on one versus the other?

All things being relatively equal, I take the guy who's 6'2 1/2", 221 lbs., versus the 5'10", 189 lb. guy because he's going to be able to be more physical, take more punishment, be more effective in blocking, etc.

Moncrief doesn't have near the hands or catching ability of those two though. He seems to be more of a body catcher.

The Franchise 04-13-2014 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559713)
He struggled against it at times though.

So then I guess we should be worried about Beckham because he's straight disappeared in games before.

Nightfyre 04-13-2014 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559716)
Moncrief doesn't have near the hands or catching ability of those two though. He seems to be more of a body catcher.

That's coachable, though. If he can be coached to attack the ball at the highest point with two hands, he is going to be one of the best receivers in the league.

O.city 04-13-2014 01:47 PM

What's with being so emotional about it?

O.city 04-13-2014 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 10559744)
That's coachable, though. If he can be coached to attack the ball at the highest point with two hands, he is going to be one of the best receivers in the league.

I don't know if it is. Seems more of an instinctual thing. Kind of like with Bowe.

The Franchise 04-13-2014 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559754)
What's with being so emotional about it?

This directed at me?

It's not emotion. It's a discussion.

Easy 6 04-13-2014 01:50 PM

No offense meant to you or anyone else who posts or makes mocks, we gotta have SOMETHING to talk about during these football doldrums... but I'm just flat SICK of seeing them at this point, lets get the real one underway pronto.

RealSNR 04-13-2014 01:52 PM

Honestly, I'd rather have Cooks or Beckham over Mike Evans.

O.city 04-13-2014 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10559736)
So then I guess we should be worried about Beckham because he's straight disappeared in games before.

Depends.

You would want to know why he disappeared. Was he just not getting balls his way? Was he not getting open?

O.city 04-13-2014 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10559778)
Honestly, I'd rather have Cooks or Beckham over Mike Evans.

In this type of offense, I agree.

However puttin Evans opposite say Megatron? Sign me up

RealSNR 04-13-2014 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10559766)
No offense meant to you or anyone else who posts or makes mocks, we gotta have SOMETHING to talk about during these football doldrums... but I'm just flat SICK of seeing them at this point, lets get the real one underway pronto.

Goodell took your request under consideration and decided to delay the draft a full 2 weeks later.

Ragged Robin 04-13-2014 01:57 PM

Moncrief's small baby hands are cause for concern. Michael Crabtree has a similar hand size and was plagued with drops in his first couple seasons..

O.city 04-13-2014 01:59 PM

Maybe trade down into the 2nd, get an extra 3rd, take Moncrief?

Saccopoo 04-13-2014 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559757)
I don't know if it is. Seems more of an instinctual thing. Kind of like with Bowe.

No, running a 4.40 40 at 6' 2 1/2", 221 lbs., with a 40" vertical is the gift.

Teaching a guy to use his hands a bit better is repetition. Like a golf swing, it's just how he learned. That's correctable.

I do agree that Beckham has some of the finest hands I've ever seen at that level. Highpoints the ball as well as anyone and his catch radius with those arms is amazing.

However, the combination of size to speed to vertical that Moncrief has is ridiculous. And it's not Baldwin size/speed/vertical. Moncrief's version is usable and translates to the football field.

The guy knows when to shorten or lengthen his stride to maximize the speed he needs. Absolutely jets off the line where guys like Baldwin and our current receiver Hemingway need a little bit of runway to get up to speed. (It's like an F-16 versus a C-130 getting to 350 mph. Both can get there, but one just does it a hell of a lot faster.)

Also, the one thing is that with an accurate QB like Alex Smith, the highpointing issue isn't as much of an issue versus getting off the line, getting into your breaks and hitting your spot. A less accurate QB needs a guy like Beckham to be able to go get the ball and make sure that it's in his hands. (Think Stafford versus Smith.) Smith and Reid's offense needs a guy to be at a spot and the ability to separate once the ball and the receiver are together. It's what held back this offense initially and what the potential was when we saw Avery actually hold onto a ball.

I love Beckham, but I'm convinced he won't be there at #23 at this point. The next guy I'd take is Moncrief, and I do like Moncrief's ability to break free and turn upfield. I don't think that there is a guy in this draft that is more capable in that regard than Moncrief other than Watkins.

RealSNR 04-13-2014 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559786)
In this type of offense, I agree.

However puttin Evans opposite say Megatron? Sign me up

Putting Cooks opposite Megatron?

The idea is you stretch out the capabilities of the other team's defensive backfield depth. Different types of players that have different skill sets will generate those mismatches more efficiently.

I just can't get past how Evans played with a crackhead QB who runs around for 7 or 8 seconds before getting rid of the ball.

O.city 04-13-2014 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10559831)
No, running a 4.40 40 at 6' 2 1/2", 221 lbs., with a 40" vertical is the gift.

Teaching a guy to use his hands a bit better is repetition. Like a golf swing, it's just how he learned. That's correctable.

I do agree that Beckham has some of the finest hands I've ever seen at that level. Highpoints the ball as well as anyone and his catch radius with those arms is amazing.

However, the combination of size to speed to vertical that Moncrief has is ridiculous. And it's not Baldwin size/speed/vertical. Moncrief's version is usable and translates to the football field.

The guy knows when to shorten or lengthen his stride to maximize the speed he needs. Absolutely jets off the line where guys like Baldwin and our current receiver Hemingway need a little bit of runway to get up to speed. (It's like an F-16 versus a C-130 getting to 350 mph. Both can get there, but one just does it a hell of a lot faster.)

Also, the one thing is that with an accurate QB like Alex Smith, the highpointing issue isn't as much of an issue versus getting off the line, getting into your breaks and hitting your spot. A less accurate QB needs a guy like Beckham to be able to go get the ball and make sure that it's in his hands. (Think Stafford versus Smith.) Smith and Reid's offense needs a guy to be at a spot and the ability to separate once the ball and the receiver are together. It's what held back this offense initially and what the potential was when we saw Avery actually hold onto a ball.

I love Beckham, but I'm convinced he won't be there at #23 at this point. The next guy I'd take is Moncrief, and I do like Moncrief's ability to break free and turn upfield. I don't think that there is a guy in this draft that is more capable in that regard than Moncrief other than Watkins.

I agree Beckham is probably gone when we pick.

Similarly to the golf swing, under pressure you revert to things you know. It takes a lot of repetition to change muscle memory.

With his focus issues from time to time, paired with being a body catcher, it's tough to endorse taking Moncrief over say Cooks.

Saccopoo 04-13-2014 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559816)
Maybe trade down into the 2nd, get an extra 3rd, take Moncrief?

It would have to be a high second.

Moncrief is a legit first round pick and I don't think he'll be there at the midway point of the second round.

Guys with his size/speed/vertical + actual production combo are extremely rare and GM's/coaches know that. Even though the drafturbators aren't showing him in the first in their mocks, I'm pretty sure that he's up there very high on most teams boards, especially those who need WR's. (And there is a lot of those.)

O.city 04-13-2014 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10559837)
Putting Cooks opposite Megatron?

The idea is you stretch out the capabilities of the other team's defensive backfield depth. Different types of players that have different skill sets will generate those mismatches more efficiently.

I just can't get past how Evans played with a crackhead QB who runs around for 7 or 8 seconds before getting rid of the ball.

With Staffords propensity to just throw it up, Evans would rape.

I also think Manziel owes quite a bi to Evans

O.city 04-13-2014 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10559867)
It would have to be a high second.

Moncrief is a legit first round pick and I don't think he'll be there at the midway point of the second round.

Guys with his size/speed/vertical + actual production combo are extremely rare and GM's/coaches know that. Even though the drafturbators aren't showing him in the first in their mocks, I'm pretty sure that he's up there very high on most teams boards, especially those who need WR's. (And there is a lot of those.)

Where do you think said draft guys are getting the info?

Saccopoo 04-13-2014 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559856)
I agree Beckham is probably gone when we pick.

Similarly to the golf swing, under pressure you revert to things you know. It takes a lot of repetition to change muscle memory.

With his focus issues from time to time, paired with being a body catcher, it's tough to endorse taking Moncrief over say Cooks.

Cooks is an excellent receiver.

But so is Moncrief and he's substantially bigger. That translates to a future #1 where I don't think Cook's frame has that potential.

And as I stated, the QB the receiver is working with is important. Moncrief has shown the ability to make the sick, ridiculous, circus show type of catches, but it's his route running, breaks and blocking ability where he'll be really good in this offense. Smith puts the ball where it needs to be versus having a receiver who needs to be able to go get the ball on a vertical. Like I said, guys like Cutler and Stafford want receivers like Beckham. Smith wants receivers like Moncrief. (Though, I ain't gonna bitch if it's Cooks, Beckham, Lee or Moncrief. All are very solid prospects who will immediately upgrade the Chiefs at that position. Shit, even the next tier guys like Matthews, Robinson, Davis, Abbrederis, Street, Norwood, etc. are all very solid players.)

Saccopoo 04-13-2014 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10559874)
Where do you think said draft guys are getting the info?

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/...ew_Darts_3.gif

O.city 04-13-2014 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10559921)
Cooks is an excellent receiver.

But so is Moncrief and he's substantially bigger. That translates to a future #1 where I don't think Cook's frame has that potential.

And as I stated, the QB the receiver is working with is important. Moncrief has shown the ability to make the sick, ridiculous, circus show type of catches, but it's his route running, breaks and blocking ability where he'll be really good in this offense. Smith puts the ball where it needs to be versus having a receiver who needs to be able to go get the ball on a vertical. Like I said, guys like Cutler and Stafford want receivers like Beckham. Smith wants receivers like Moncrief. (Though, I ain't gonna bitch if it's Cooks, Beckham, Lee or Moncrief. All are very solid prospects who will immediately upgrade the Chiefs at that position. Shit, even the next tier guys like Matthews, Robinson, Davis, Abbrederis, Street, Norwood, etc. are all very solid players.)

Even with a Qb who puts it where you want it, you still want I catch I with your hands though.

I didn't realize it but Moncrief also has small hands.

I dunno, I'll refer to you guys in him, but IMO, I'd rather have Beckham cooks and lee in this offense.

Nightfyre 04-13-2014 02:27 PM

The biggest thing Moncrief has working against him is the fact that he took plays off and was a selfish player, imo. Attitude is important to success.

RunKC 04-13-2014 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10559704)
And I think that Moncrief goes above Beckham with those non-limiters as Beckham does Cooks.

Those limiters being size, arm length, verticality, speed, blocking ability, etc.

All three are exceptionally solid WR prospects, run solid routes, do the little things, but when you consider that:

Cooks: 5'10", 189 lbs., 30 3/4" arms, 9 5/8" hands, 4.33 40, 36.0" vert, 120" broad
Beckham: 5'11", 195 lbs., 32 3/4" arms, 10" hands, 4.43 40, 38.5" vert, 122" broad
Moncrief: 6'2 1/2", 221 lbs., 32 3/8" arms, 9 1/8" hands, 4.40 40, 39.5" vert, 132" broad

Beckham is bigger than Cooks with better explosiveness, Moncrief is bigger than Beckham with more explosiveness.

All three run great routes. All three block well. All three jet off the line.

What's the difference? What's the "limitations" on one versus the other?

All things being relatively equal, I take the guy who's 6'2 1/2", 221 lbs., versus the 5'10", 189 lb. guy because he's going to be able to be more physical, take more punishment, be more effective in blocking, etc.

Another reason we might be looking at the big WR's is because in the WCO that Reid runs it's a nice benefit to have big guys like Bowe to block out DB's on that cross routes/short routes.
That's a big reason why Alex Smith trusted Bowe later on IMO. His TE's in SF gave him that huge benefit.

Here's a great example.

http://cdn1.sbnation.com/assets/3808...gif_medium.gif

It's really ****ing hard for DB's to defend against these guys on plays like this, that we run a lot of in this system.

This is why they LOVE Mike Evans IMO. Too bad he is out of our reach.

RunKC 04-13-2014 03:31 PM

Also brings up Cody Latimer. He's been skyrocketing way up the boards from a 5th round pick, to a 3rd round pick and now after his pro day some people think he's a 1st round talent hiding in the shithole known as Indiana football.

Hog's Gone Fishin 04-13-2014 05:29 PM

The more I think about it , after wanting a Rd 1 Wr so bad, we are better of going CB / Safety with all our picks.

OldSchool 04-13-2014 05:33 PM

I wouldn't hate it if we drafted Roby, he's a very talented player and has great potential.

RunKC 04-13-2014 06:00 PM

All of our losses were to the Broncos, Chargers and Colts.

Our offense was able to score against them. We lost because we couldn't stop their pass offense. And on top of that you have to worry about Tom Brady.

CB being picked at 23 doesn't bother me in the slightest.

Mr_Tomahawk 04-13-2014 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10560818)
All of our losses were to the Broncos, Chargers and Colts.

Our offense was able to score against them. We lost because we couldn't stop their pass offense. And on top of that you have to worry about Tom Brady.

CB being picked at 23 doesn't bother me in the slightest.

Agreed.

And Andy can find a damn good reciever in the mid round. Take a CB or pass rusher. The defense needs more help than our offense.

milkman 04-13-2014 07:13 PM

This defwnse needs a FS far more than a CB.

You stupid ****ers all bitch and moan that Bob Sutton didn't make any adjustments, when, in fact, he did.

He tried to cover foir the gaping hole at free safety by lining the corners off the line after teams began to exploit deep routes that Lewis failed to help with.

The problem is that it allowed teams to rape this defense on the quick dink and dunks that the Mannings and Rivers of the world thrive on.

Find a FS that can play the single high technique, and allow these corners to play the press physical coverage that they thrive on, and this secondary is plenty good enough to play against the QBs that scare your dumb asses.

kccrow 04-13-2014 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10560980)
This defwnse needs a FS far more than a CB.

You stupid ****ers all bitch and moan that Bob Sutton didn't make any adjustments, when, in fact, he did.

He tried to cover foir the gaping hole at free safety by lining the corners off the line after teams began to exploit deep routes that Lewis failed to help with.

The problem is that it allowed teams to rape this defense on the quick dink and dunks that the Mannings and Rivers of the world thrive on.

Find a FS that can play the single high technique, and allow these corners to play the press physical coverage that they thrive on, and this secondary is plenty good enough to play against the QBs that scare your dumb asses.

All well said... only issue is you're likely going to have to reach early (round 1) for one or move up into round 2 somehow to get one of the others that will be around. That is, unless you can trade down which will be easier said than done this year. Ideally, I like Deone Buchanon out of Washington State, but he's looking like he'll go in round 2.

Saccopoo 04-13-2014 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10560818)
All of our losses were to the Broncos, Chargers and Colts.

Our offense was able to score against them. We lost because we couldn't stop their pass offense. And on top of that you have to worry about Tom Brady.

CB being picked at 23 doesn't bother me in the slightest.

I'm not sure that CB is necessarily the issue.

Poor LB and FS help were more instrumental in those losses than deficiencies on outside coverage, IMO. Neither Lewis nor Jordan were very effective in providing help on passing downs. I'm trying to think back over the past season and I can't remember Jordan doing much of anything. I'm not sure how much Mays is going to help either in that regard.

That being said, we do need some additional help at the CB position, much in the same manner as we need it at the OLB or OT spots. Starters are fine, but there isn't anything behind them.

However, I'm not sold on spending a first round pick on what is going to amount to a backup for the foreseeable future (3 years or so). The holes at OG, MLB and WR are certainly more demanding of attention.

Are you more comfortable with Joe Mays than Kyle Van Noy?

Are you more comfortable with with Donnie Avery than Marquis Lee/Brandin Cooks/Odell Beckham?

Are you more comfortable with Roke Watkins/Jeff Allen than Gabe Jackson/Xavier S'ua-Filo?

Are you more comfortable with Sean Smith/Brandon Flowers than Bradley Roby?

As Milk has said a couple of times, it wasn't necessarily that our corners or Sutton failed us, it was FS that ultimately led to our demise. (And I'd contend that the other ILB spot manned by Jordan didn't help matters either.)

Now, we will have a healthy Sanders Commings along with the recent signing of Jerron McMillian to go with Husain Abdullah and Eric Berry. In Commings, McMillian and Berry, you've got three guys who run in the mid 4.4's with very good verticals. I think our safety corps will be much improved this next season.

BossChief 04-13-2014 09:47 PM

Positions that shouldn't even be on te draft board for the 23 slot:

CB
C
G
OT
ILB
RB
FB
K/P

All of those positions are either extremely deep, where a player of similar ability can be had later in the draft (CB, OT) or are a position not worth of that high of a pick.

Taking Roby in what could be the best corner class in the last 20 years would be a massive waste of a valuable resource.

BossChief 04-13-2014 09:50 PM

Also, this is one of the poorest written pieces to make it past editors in quite some time.

"Though and through" ? Really?

The Chiefs could go Marquise Lee here (even though Lee goes to the Eagles before our pick)

I don't want to list the rest of the crap

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-13-2014 09:53 PM

The thing about taking a guy like Ealy is that he improves your run and pass defense simultaneously. Corners can't really do that.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.