ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Alex Smith: I don't think anyone is going to be too hard headed (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=285069)

Carlota69 07-18-2014 08:16 AM

Alex Smith: I don't think anyone is going to be too hard headed
 
Alex Smith says he hopes to remain with Chiefs
By RANDY COVITZ

John Sleezer/ The Kansas City Star
Chiefs quarterback Alex Smith has one year left on his contract, but wants to sign an extension with the team.
Chiefs quarterback Alex Smith still isn’t assured of what his future holds beyond the upcoming season.

But Smith, who has one year left on his contract, let it be known he wants to sign an extension and continue his career in Kansas City.

“I’d love to have it done,” Smith said in a phone interview on Thursday. “I love Kansas City, I love the coaching staff, the players … but when you’re talking about this many years and that type of deal, you want it done right. You want both sides happy, and you want it to be something that is going to last and you can play out. A lot of things go into it.

“With that, there’s still plenty of time. I still have a whole year left, and who knows what will happen?”

Smith said his representatives had discussions with Chiefs general manager John Dorsey until this month when the league goes dormant before camp, which starts for Chiefs quarterbacks and rookies Monday in St. Joseph.

“This time of year, the whole NFL is put on hold because this is the little time coaches and general managers have off, just like the rest of us,” said Smith, speaking from Lake Tahoe, Nev., where he is competing in the American Century Celebrity Golf Championship.

“We’ve continued talks, had open conversation, but no news to report.”

The Chiefs, with about $9.4 million of salary cap space available, are facing a dilemma with Smith, 30, and outside linebacker Justin Houston, 25, entering the final years of their contracts before they would become unrestricted free agents.

It’s possible they sign one of them to a long-term deal and use the franchise tag on the other next spring. This season, the franchise tender was $16.2 million for quarterbacks and $11.4 million for linebackers. Smith is due $7.5 million this year, while Houston, who would earn $1.4 million, did not report to the Chiefs’ voluntary off-season program or mandatory mini-camp.

The Chiefs cleared about $7.5 million in salary cap room that can be used to sign either Smith or Houston when they released cornerback Brandon Flowers last month, but Smith didn’t look at it that way.

“Someone told me that, and that’s not what I thought,” Smith said with a laugh. “I thought, ‘Oh man, we lost a good corner.’ I wasn’t thinking about it from a money perspective. Here’s a guy who has started virtually every game for us last year, so now we have to replace him.”

Smith, acquired from San Francisco in a March 2013 trade, was 11-4 as a starter for the Chiefs last season and the team to the playoffs a year after they went 2-14, tied for the worst record in the league.

He is 30-9-1 as a starter in the last three seasons, having led San Francisco to the NFC championship game in 2011 and helping the 49ers to the Super Bowl in 2012 before coming to Kansas City, where he established career bests with 308 completions, 508 attempts, 3,313 yards and 23 touchdowns with just seven interceptions.

Quarterbacks such as Tony Romo, Matthew Stafford and Jay Cutler, who are all in the $18 million-a-year range, don’t have near the track record as Smith.

“We’re getting pretty close to where I’m not thinking about any of that,” Smith said, “but certainly when you’re talking about comparables and what the marketplace is for a quarterback, certainly you’re looking at that, and I feel like my body of work of the last three, four years is right up there with a lot of those guys. No question, when you’re trying to put a value on something like that, you look at a lot of stuff.

“But real soon come Sunday, all that stuff is going to get turned off for me.”

Smith said it can be difficult to compartmentalize worrying about his contract and studying his playbook.

“When I talk to management, we talk about that, and that’s great, and then flush it, and we focus on football and doing what we have to do to help us win,” he said.

Smith said if a contract extension isn’t wrapped up by the start of the season, it doesn’t mean it can’t be done before next March.

“You’re talking about until next March when free agency would potentially start,” Smith said. “It’s a long time between now and then for something to get hashed out.

“Just knowing John (Dorsey) and (head coach) Andy (Reid) … they’re flexible and pragmatic guys,” Smith said. “I don’t think anyone is going to be too hard-headed, and we’re trying to get it done the best way we can"


Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2014/07/17/355...#storylink=cpy

ptlyon 07-18-2014 08:24 AM

So he has one year left on his contract Randy?

Do you even read your shit before you send it?

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-18-2014 08:28 AM

TAG! You're it.

Bitch.

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 08:39 AM

LOL at the (lazy) assertion that Alex Smith has a better track record than Tony Romo.

Alex Smith has played on better teams the past 3 years. Tony Romo has been the better QB.

If you want to debate it with Cutler or Stafford, OK. You can make arguments either way. I've never been a big believer in Stafford, and Cutler can't stay healthy.

Prison Bitch 07-18-2014 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10752551)
LOL at the (lazy) assertion that Alex Smith has a better track record than Tony Romo.

Alex Smith has played on better teams the past 3 years. Tony Romo has been the better QB.

If you want to debate it with Cutler or Stafford, OK. You can make arguments either way. I've never been a big believer in Stafford, and Cutler can't stay healthy.

Just beat me to It. That was my exact take away too, lol at Covitz. By te way nice job reading the article to dig that out since most posters read one paragraph then opine Smith sucks or is good.

Halfcan 07-18-2014 08:44 AM

“Someone told me that, and that’s not what I thought,” Smith said with a laugh. “I thought, ‘Oh man, we lost a good corner.’ I wasn’t thinking about it from a money perspective.

Yep sure Alex- nobody ever thinks about it for the money....well except the Chiefs.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 07-18-2014 08:45 AM

Please don't pay this clown

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 10752560)
Just beat me to It. That was my exact take away too, lol at Covitz. By te way nice job reading the article to dig that out since most posters read one paragraph then opine Smith sucks or is good.

I also enjoyed the assertion Alex Smith "Led" the 49ers to the NFC Championship game. Suuuuuuuuuuuuuure he did. In the same way that John Paxson led the Chicago Bulls to 2 NBA championships.

Ragged Robin 07-18-2014 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10752574)
I also enjoyed the assertion Alex Smith "Led" the 49ers to the NFC Championship game. Suuuuuuuuuuuuuure he did. In the same way that John Paxson led the Chicago Bulls to 2 NBA championships.

He had like six 4th quarter comebacks that year and is also the reason why they beat the Saints in the playoffs to get to the NFCC. Not quite the same as when Mark Sanchez "led" the Jets to the AFCC in back to back seasons.

Prison Bitch 07-18-2014 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10752574)
I also enjoyed the assertion Alex Smith "Led" the 49ers to the NFC Championship game. Suuuuuuuuuuuuuure he did. In the same way that John Paxson led the Chicago Bulls to 2 NBA championships.

You are off to a good start this morning. A bit chippy too.

splatbass 07-18-2014 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10752551)
LOL at the (lazy) assertion that Alex Smith has a better track record than Tony Romo.

Alex Smith has played on better teams the past 3 years. Tony Romo has been the better QB.

Tony Romo is great as long as the game isn't on the line. He is the biggest choke artist in the NFL, and has lost a lot of games for the Cowboys with stupid mistakes under pressure at key points in the game. I'd take Alex Smith over him any day of the week.

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 10752614)
You are off to a good start this morning. A bit chippy too.

Nothing like a good Alex Smith topic to bring out the snark.

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 10752626)
Tony Romo is great as long as the game isn't on the line. He is the biggest choke artist in the NFL, and has lost a lot of games for the Cowboys with stupid mistakes under pressure at key points in the game. I'd take Alex Smith over him any day of the week.

This is common perception of Tony Romo, but it isn't factual. Romo has 11 4th quarter comebacks in the past three years and completes nearly 70 percent of his passes with a passer rating well over 100 in the 4th quarter.

O.city 07-18-2014 09:45 AM

Romo has been on shit teams. He's carried them to what they've been.

He isn't nearly as bad as the rep he gets, but he does seem to have bonehead plays at opportune times more so than the next guy. I think it's more so because e presses because those around him suck but that's debatable.

In any matter, using team wins and losses to justify or knock QB play is pretty unfair (for lack of better word).

It's hard to say. I think Smith in Reid's system is or potentially could be as good as Romo, but romo in a Reid system would be pretty awesome.

In regards to Romo, is it fair to say he wouldn't have to have all those comeback wins if he played better earlier? Chicken and egg I guess.

O.city 07-18-2014 09:47 AM

If Cutler stays healthy in that system with those weapons, he could be a top 5 passer this year.

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10752745)
Romo has been on shit teams. He's carried them to what they've been.

He isn't nearly as bad as the rep he gets, but he does seem to have bonehead plays at opportune times more so than the next guy. I think it's more so because e presses because those around him suck but that's debatable.

In any matter, using team wins and losses to justify or knock QB play is pretty unfair (for lack of better word).

It's hard to say. I think Smith in Reid's system is or potentially could be as good as Romo, but romo in a Reid system would be pretty awesome.

In regards to Romo, is it fair to say he wouldn't have to have all those comeback wins if he played better earlier? Chicken and egg I guess.

I'd say he wouldn't have as many comeback wins if he played better earlier, but it's also a team game. An unreliable defense and not great team around him (weak OL, weak running game) contribute to the need for all those comebacks, too.

I don't think Romo is a superstar by any means, and he definitely has flaws. But to suggest Alex Smith is on a level that Romo doesn't "come near" as Randy Covitz did is just incredibly lazy, misinformed and stupid.

O.city 07-18-2014 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10752789)
I'd say he wouldn't have as many comeback wins if he played better earlier, but it's also a team game. An unreliable defense and not great team around him (weak OL, weak running game) contribute to the need for all those comebacks, too.

I don't think Romo is a superstar by any means, and he definitely has flaws. But to suggest Alex Smith is on a level that Romo doesn't "come near" as Randy Covitz did is just incredibly lazy, misinformed and stupid.

Sure.

But that works both ways. When the team around you is good, you probably don't have to try and gunsling like Romo does.

Iirc, smith had 6 comeback wins in the his last year as 9ers starter, with a much better team around him.

So I don't think it's necessarily fair to use the team argument for 1 and not the other, in these types of discussions.

O.city 07-18-2014 10:13 AM

But again, its what makes these discussions so tough.

A QB guru like Andy Reid apparently is, constantly pushes and wants Smith to be more aggressive, where Harbaugh was the opposite with his philosophy.

I think a good part o success depends on the player, but I think system and philosophy as well as the players match to that is becoming more and more important.

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10752801)
Sure.

But that works both ways. When the team around you is good, you probably don't have to try and gunsling like Romo does.

Iirc, smith had 6 comeback wins in the his last year as 9ers starter, with a much better team around him.

So I don't think it's necessarily fair to use the team argument for 1 and not the other, in these types of discussions.

Yeah, I agree that you can apply some chicken and egg to any QB when it comes to 4th quarter stuff. And that Romo has helped dig some of the holes he had to dig out of.

Mr. Laz 07-18-2014 10:39 AM

The only reason it's either/or is because the Chiefs are cheap

TEX 07-18-2014 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10752705)
Nothing like a good Alex Smith topic to bring out the snark.



This is common perception of Tony Romo, but it isn't factual. Romo has 11 4th quarter comebacks in the past three years and completes nearly 70 percent of his passes with a passer rating well over 100 in the 4th quarter.

Yep, you beat me to it. Deal is Romo's tendency to make a bone head play hides the facts.

Rasputin 07-18-2014 11:35 AM

Hope he doesn't sign anything and Chiefs keep options open for next year. I know it's just wishful thinking but damn wish Chiefs would draft a damn quarterback in the first round.

Bugeater 07-18-2014 11:39 AM

If no one was being hard-headed the deal would be done by now.

dls6501 07-18-2014 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10752604)
He had like six 4th quarter comebacks that year and is also the reason why they beat the Saints in the playoffs to get to the NFCC. Not quite the same as when Mark Sanchez "led" the Jets to the AFCC in back to back seasons.

The 4th quarter comeback stat looks nice on the surface.....but when you actually look at the games and see that Alex Smith was completely ineffective for much of the game and then made one or two nice throws late in the game, you wont put much stock in the "comebacks."

Example: Bengals game. Alex dinked and dunked his way to about 150 yards through 3+ quarters of football and led the Niners to a grand total of THREE points. Multiple 3 and outs, terrible 3rd down conversion rate, etc. Then the Bengals went ahead by a FG with 9 minutes left. Alex got the ball back and was helped by chunk rushing plays and a HUGE Vernon Davis play where Alex checked down to him and Davis broke for 20+ yards. Then Kendall Hunter runs the ball in for the go ahead touchdown.

And THAT is one of the "comebacks" Alex was credited for. See my point?

And yes, Alex had a good game against the Saints in the playoffs. But won it by himself? Laughable comment. No QB in the history of football can be credited for "winning a game by himself" when said QB's defense forced FIVE turnovers that game.

-King- 07-18-2014 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bacon Cheeseburger (Post 10752961)
If no one was being hard-headed the deal would be done by now.

Why? There's no rush to get a deal done from either side.
Posted via Mobile Device

ptlyon 07-18-2014 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PizzaDoughz (Post 10753017)
I'm rooting for Smith to get his money. He went to my high school along with Reggie Bush. I've been following them and rooting for them for awhile. They were both supposed to be at a charity event for my school (hosted by taco bell) but only Reggie showed up, really wanted to see Smith. Oh and coincedentally Alex Smith's dad used to be our high schools principal lol

Please don't bother posting again, thanks.

Marcellus 07-18-2014 12:23 PM

Alex Smith didn't lead his teams anywhere yet Kapernick, Wilson, etc....have all lead their teams to their wins.

And now Romo is a great QB even though in the end he loses as many games as he wins usually by turning the ball over.

This place never fails to deliver.

'Hamas' Jenkins 07-18-2014 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PizzaDoughz (Post 10753030)
Lol thanks but no thanks. I'm a Smith fan, and this is a public forum. You can put me on the block list if my posts bother you that much. ROFL

****ing kill yourself you one who sucks the penis.

Mr. Laz 07-18-2014 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 10753031)
****ing kill yourself you one who sucks the penis.

support the QB of the Chiefs and your enemy #1?



You're a complete ****head, just die already.

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10753020)
Alex Smith didn't lead his teams anywhere yet Kapernick, Wilson, etc....have all lead their teams to their wins.

And now Romo is a great QB even though in the end he loses as many games as he wins usually by turning the ball over.

This place never fails to deliver.

Who brought Colin Kaerpernick or Russell Wilson into the equation? You.

While we're looking at Kaerpernick, though, look at the 49ers in the 2011 playoffs and the 2012 playoffs and tell me if you see a difference in the play of the QB and performance of the offense.

No one said Romo is great. Just that he is better than his rep - especially in clutch situations - and that Covitz's assertion that Smith was on a clear other level from him is patently ridiculous.

Marcellus 07-18-2014 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10753068)
Who brought Colin Kaerpernick or Russell Wilson into the equation? You.

While we're looking at Kaerpernick, though, look at the 49ers in the 2011 playoffs and the 2012 playoffs and tell me if you see a difference in the play of the QB and performance of the offense.

No one said Romo is great. Just that he is better than his rep - especially in clutch situations - and that Covitz's assertion that Smith was on a clear other level from him is patently ridiculous.

You understand the double standards. You do.

BTW Smith had the best single game QBR of any QB in the entire post season last year.

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10753112)
You understand the double standards. You do.

BTW Smith had the best single game QBR of any QB in the entire post season last year.

Yup. He played very well and pleasantly surprised his doubters.

This suggestion of Covitz's that Tony Romo doesn't have "near the track record of Smith's" is still patently ridiculous and lazy.

Marcellus 07-18-2014 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10753129)
Yup. He played very well and pleasantly surprised his doubters.

This suggestion of Covitz's that Tony Romo doesn't have "near the track record of Smith's" is still patently ridiculous and lazy.

I think it was in reference to 30-9-1 the last 3 seasons.

Romo is a .500 QB largely because of timely turnovers and bad decisions.

Don't use the talent around him excuse either. He has played on some loaded teams and has the exact number of playoff wins Smith does.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-18-2014 01:46 PM

Dear God, please don't extend him.

wazu 07-18-2014 01:49 PM

Really think the Chiefs should let this season play out. If he kicks ass against this schedule, then I'm on board.

KCUnited 07-18-2014 01:53 PM

Looking at that ESPN projected roster, if I'm Smith, I'd like to ink what's likely the last deal of my career before actually having to put the pads on and play behind that mess.

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10753144)
I think it was in reference to 30-9-1 the last 3 seasons.

Romo is a .500 QB largely because of timely turnovers and bad decisions.

Don't use the talent around him excuse either. He has played on some loaded teams and has the exact number of playoff wins Smith does.

And using team record to judge a QB is stupid and lazy, no matter if it leaves a positive or negative impression.

This is from Bleacher Report, but the guy did the research on Romo's 4th quarter performance and I might as well let you read it from him:

LINK

Wildcat2005 07-18-2014 02:06 PM

I really don't like the way people judge individuals on team records

You should look up Vince Young's winning %

Not defending Romo's mistakes, but would never say he played on teams that were "stacked" like the 49ers have been

For the most part he has carried that team on his back

ptlyon 07-18-2014 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wildcat2005 (Post 10753205)
I really don't like the way people judge individuals on team records

You should look up Vince Young's winning %

Not defending Romo's mistakes, but would never say he played on teams that were "stacked" like the 49ers have been

For the most part he has carried that team on his back

WTFE, they got Dez Bryant

Wildcat2005 07-18-2014 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 10753210)
WTFE, they got Dez Bryant

Pretty sure San Fran's defense and running game trumps Dez Bryant

From a roster perspective the Cowboys have been mediocre at best for a while now
Their defense was terrible last year and will probably be worse this year

ptlyon 07-18-2014 02:17 PM

Sorry Wildcat, your humor meter must be broken

Pablo 07-18-2014 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 10753176)
Looking at that ESPN projected roster, if I'm Smith, I'd like to ink what's likely the last deal of my career before actually having to put the pads on and play behind that mess.

No doubt.

This line is shaping up to be a hot pile of garbage. At least he's got wheels, but I'd have to agree with you. Get your money before you take the beating.

WakkaWakka 07-18-2014 03:27 PM

Per Twitter

“@PFCentral: The Chiefs offered around $17 mil a year which has been turned down by Smith's agents. They argue the 30-9-1 record should get them more”

ptlyon 07-18-2014 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WakkaWakka (Post 10753386)
Per Twitter

“@PFCentral: The Chiefs offered around $17 mil a year which has been turned down by Smith's agents. They argue the 30-9-1 record should get them more”

:old:

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-18-2014 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10753112)
You understand the double standards. You do.

BTW Smith had the best single game QBR of any QB in the entire post season last year.

That worked out well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 10753162)
Dear God, please don't extend him.

This. Be incredibly hard-headed.

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WakkaWakka (Post 10753386)
Per Twitter

“@PFCentral: The Chiefs offered around $17 mil a year which has been turned down by Smith's agents. They argue the 30-9-1 record should get them more”

Then he can kindly go f*** himself.

Tribal Warfare 07-18-2014 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WakkaWakka (Post 10753386)
Per Twitter

“@PFCentral: The Chiefs offered around $17 mil a year which has been turned down by Smith's agents. They argue the 30-9-1 record should get them more”

Of course he isn't being self-centered and greedy

New World Order 07-18-2014 04:00 PM

Did Smith's agent bring up his playoff record during negotiations?

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-18-2014 04:00 PM

Goodbye, sir.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-18-2014 04:01 PM

Hello, Marcus!

ShowtimeSBMVP 07-18-2014 04:03 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>A source tells me negotiations continue between the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash">#Chiefs</a> and Alex Smith, but there are &quot;significant&quot; differences between the two sides.</p>&mdash; Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor/statuses/490254984861057024">July 18, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10753464)
Of course he isn't being self-centered and greedy

He just wants a team to want him, right? As long as they make a long commitment to him, he'll sign a below market-value deal...

ShowtimeSBMVP 07-18-2014 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WakkaWakka (Post 10753386)
Per Twitter

“@PFCentral: The Chiefs offered around $17 mil a year which has been turned down by Smith's agents. They argue the 30-9-1 record should get them more”

That site is wrong a lot. FWIW

Chiefs Pantalones 07-18-2014 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WakkaWakka (Post 10753386)
Per Twitter

“@PFCentral: The Chiefs offered around $17 mil a year which has been turned down by Smith's agents. They argue the 30-9-1 record should get them more”

If my QB can't connect on a 20 yard fly pattern to an open Cyrus Gray going down the sideline to put the game out of reach then I'm not giving him 17 cents. That play and the playoff game was Smith's later part of his career in a nutshell. I'm not mad at him though, he is who he is. He's the ultimate game manager QB. He took that game manager roll and perfected it. He can't carry a team. The team is only going as far the team takes them, he's just along for the ride and his job is to not screw it up. He won't win games for us against top competition, we just have to hope the WHOLE team brings it more often than not.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-18-2014 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10753490)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>A source tells me negotiations continue between the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash">#Chiefs</a> and Alex Smith, but there are &quot;significant&quot; differences between the two sides.</p>&mdash; Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor/statuses/490254984861057024">July 18, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That's because Dorsey has seen a great QB; drafted one. He's not paying a QB of Smith's caliber that much. He's like 30. He's not improving much.

JakeLV 07-18-2014 04:37 PM

I won't be satisfied we draft a 1st RD QB, regardless of the success we have leading up to it

/CP

Fish 07-18-2014 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WakkaWakka (Post 10753386)
Per Twitter

“@PFCentral: The Chiefs offered around $17 mil a year which has been turned down by Smith's agents. They argue the 30-9-1 record should get them more”

Then let him go try and find that....

Discuss Thrower 07-18-2014 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeLV (Post 10753585)
I won't be satisfied we draft a 1st RD QB, regardless of the success we have leading up to it

/CP

Notice what QBs not named Brees or Wilson have won superbowls lately?

Bugeater 07-18-2014 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WakkaWakka (Post 10753386)
Per Twitter

“@PFCentral: The Chiefs offered around $17 mil a year which has been turned down by Smith's agents. They argue the 30-9-1 record should get them more”

But nobody is going to be hard-headed....

BigMeatballDave 07-18-2014 04:57 PM

The flow is heavy in here.

-King- 07-18-2014 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 10753572)
If my QB can't connect on a 20 yard fly pattern to an open Cyrus Gray going down the sideline to put the game out of reach then I'm not giving him 17 cents. That play and the playoff game was Smith's later part of his career in a nutshell. I'm not mad at him though, he is who he is. He's the ultimate game manager QB. He took that game manager roll and perfected it. He can't carry a team. The team is only going as far the team takes them, he's just along for the ride and his job is to not screw it up. He won't win games for us against top competition, we just have to hope the WHOLE team brings it more often than not.

Uh, that play was Cyrus Grays fault. He even admitted to slowing down.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-18-2014 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10753615)
Uh, that play was Cyrus Grays fault. He even admitted to slowing down.

Oh he did? That's news to me. Bastard Gray.

BigMeatballDave 07-18-2014 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 10753620)
Oh he did? That's news to me. Bastard Gray.

People tend to only hear what they want to hear.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-18-2014 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 10753622)
People tend to only hear what they want to hear.

I'm not Smith's biggest fan but he did play great against a swiss cheese defense. It's not his fault we played the Colts. I just don't think it's smart to extend a guy we could get for free. It's like being in purgatory. Although I'm sure no matter what at some point if we did extend him Dorsey/Reid will draft a legitimate replacement, not a piss in the wind pray he develops mid-round guy. Although we are due to hit a homerun at some point in the QB department you'd think lol.

Deberg_1990 07-18-2014 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10752705)
Nothing like a good Alex Smith topic to bring out the snark.



This is common perception of Tony Romo, but it isn't factual. Romo has 11 4th quarter comebacks in the past three years and completes nearly 70 percent of his passes with a passer rating well over 100 in the 4th quarter.

Heres the thing. Romo is very talented, but he gives games away just as much as he carries them to wins. Hes a frustrating talent.

Alex Smith isnt as talented a passer, but he plays within the system and does not turn the ball over. Thats why hes been more successful of late rather than Romo.

Romo is basically a Jeff George. His box scores look good, but he takes too many risky throws and makes alot of mental mistakes.

Alot of Romos problems though are the Cowboys suck as an organization and dont develop talent very well. Not that I care....

Oh yea, Alex Smith beat Romo last year. : )

OldSchool 07-18-2014 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10752745)
Romo has been on shit teams. He's carried them to what they've been.

He isn't nearly as bad as the rep he gets, but he does seem to have bonehead plays at opportune times more so than the next guy. I think it's more so because e presses because those around him suck but that's debatable.

In any matter, using team wins and losses to justify or knock QB play is pretty unfair (for lack of better word).

It's hard to say. I think Smith in Reid's system is or potentially could be as good as Romo, but romo in a Reid system would be pretty awesome.

In regards to Romo, is it fair to say he wouldn't have to have all those comeback wins if he played better earlier? Chicken and egg I guess.

Romo has bad players around him? He has one of the League's best OLs now, a true star WR in Dez Bryant and has always had above average talent at every skill position to help him out on offense. He's a step above Stafford and Cutler but he makes the same team killing mistakes that they are prone to make. It's the reason why the Cowboys failed miserably with him even when they were actually one of the best teams in the league with Ware in his prime.

Red Dawg 07-18-2014 05:29 PM

Smith will not get 17 mil per year from any team. He will sign with us for like 14 mill per year and that's fair.

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 10753644)
Heres the thing. Romo is very talented, but he gives games away just as much as he carries them to wins. Hes a frustrating talent.

Alex Smith isnt as talented a passer, but he plays within the system and does not turn the ball over. Thats why hes been more successful of late rather than Romo.

Romo is basically a Jeff George. His box scores look good, but he takes too many risky throws and makes alot of mental mistakes.

Alot of Romos problems though are the Cowboys suck as an organization and dont develop talent very well. Not that I care....

Oh yea, Alex Smith beat Romo last year. : )

Alex Smith has been more successful of late because he was paired with an elite defense in San Francisco and and a defense that played at an elite level for 2/3 of the season in KC.

Meanwhile, only two teams have given up 30+ points more often than the Cowboys the past three season.

This is exactly what I was talking about regarding the perception of Romo, though... the perception is that he blows it more often than he succeeds in close situations, but the numbers just don't back that up.

Romo has a higher efficiency rating and FEWER INTs in close games/4th quarter over the past 3 years than a long list of QBs who are viewed as clutch - or at least not as choke artists.

Kaepernick 07-18-2014 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 10752626)
Tony Romo is great as long as the game isn't on the line. He is the biggest choke artist in the NFL, and has lost a lot of games for the Cowboys with stupid mistakes under pressure at key points in the game. I'd take Alex Smith over him any day of the week.

I thought Peyton was the biggest choke artist in the NFL. Now I'm so confused. :p

In all seriousness, Romo is flat inconsistent. I wouldn't want a QB like him that could kill me at any time and likely the worst time. I would actually take Alex over Romo, and it is not like I think Alex is a top QB. Yes, he is just a journeyman, a game manager, but he is consistent and he is not likely to throw the game away.

I would take Alex over Romo or Cutler. I'm not so sure about Stafford. I think the jury is out on him yet.

Saccopoo 07-18-2014 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudy lost the toss (Post 10752571)
Please don't pay this clown

Yeah...that would be a great idea.

I hope we just let Smith walk after next year and go with Daniel, Bray and Murray.

I ****ing hate golf.

Kaepernick 07-18-2014 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 10753591)
Notice what QBs not named Brees or Wilson have won superbowls lately?

Yes. QBs with top rated Defenses.

Saccopoo 07-18-2014 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 10753668)
Smith will not get 17 mil per year from any team. He will sign with us for like 14 mill per year and that's fair.

Cutler, Stafford and Romo.

You are ****ing high or reeruned to think that there isn't a team out there that won't offer Smith the exact same money or more.

He's a much better quarterback than those piles of squirrel shit.

Tribal Warfare 07-18-2014 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10753875)
Cutler, Stafford and Romo.

You are ****ing high or reeruned to think that there isn't a team out there that won't offer Smith the exact same money or more.

He's a much better quarterback than those piles of squirrel shit.

If KC thought the same way he'd be signed now.

Saccopoo 07-18-2014 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 10753910)
If KC thought the same way he'd be signed now.

Kansas City is going to be ****ed if they don't.

Deberg_1990 07-18-2014 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10753847)
Alex Smith has been more successful of late because he was paired with an elite defense in San Francisco and and a defense that played at an elite level for 2/3 of the season in KC.

Meanwhile, only two teams have given up 30+ points more often than the Cowboys the past three season.

This is exactly what I was talking about regarding the perception of Romo, though... the perception is that he blows it more often than he succeeds in close situations, but the numbers just don't back that up.

Romo has a higher efficiency rating and FEWER INTs in close games/4th quarter over the past 3 years than a long list of QBs who are viewed as clutch - or at least not as choke artists.

Some of this is true sure. Romo is the best thing about a mediocre organization.

The cowboys have failed Romo ultimately. Jerry jones is a shit GM and Garrett is a shit HC.

Tribal Warfare 07-18-2014 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10753924)
Kansas City is going to be ****ed if they don't.

Again, they seemingly don't believe that with the price he's asking for.

SAUTO 07-18-2014 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaepernick (Post 10753850)
I thought Peyton was the biggest choke artist in the NFL. Now I'm so confused. :p

In all seriousness, Romo is flat inconsistent. I wouldn't want a QB like him that could kill me at any time and likely the worst time. I would actually take Alex over Romo, and it is not like I think Alex is a top QB. Yes, he is just a journeyman, a game manager, but he is consistent and he is not likely to throw the game away.

I would take Alex over Romo or Cutler. I'm not so sure about Stafford. I think the jury is out on him yet.

All this from kaepernick
Posted via Mobile Device

Baby Lee 07-18-2014 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 10753572)
That play and the playoff game was Smith's later part of his career in a nutshell.

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10753615)
Uh, that play was Cyrus Grays fault. He even admitted to slowing down.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 10753620)
Oh he did? That's news to me. Bastard Gray.

So in summation, Smith's career in a nutshell, if one single play can be a nutshell [UrumphROMO!!], is a bunch of drive-by fans who misread a single play and demonize his entire past, present and future over said misreading.

Sounds about right.

duncan_idaho 07-18-2014 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10753875)
Cutler, Stafford and Romo.

You are ****ing high or reeruned to think that there isn't a team out there that won't offer Smith the exact same money or more.

He and those piles of squirrel shit are in the same tier of NFL QBs.

FYP

Mav 07-18-2014 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 10753941)
All this from kaepernick
Posted via Mobile Device

Except the journeyman party.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-18-2014 09:04 PM

"Any time you get an opportunity like that, you expect to hit it," Smith told reporters after the playoff defeat, per The Kansas City Star. "The tough part is all week we so many reps, (and) obviously with Jamaal (Charles) getting all of those, it's just something we have never repped with Cyrus."

Gray acknowledged that he momentarily slowed his stride on the route, but Smith told the room: "You've still got to hit it."


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.