ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Dee Ford (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=286541)

Buzz 09-14-2014 05:49 PM

Dee Ford
 
Did the guy even touch the field today? Kinda like last week, dude is a ghost. First round pick should be playing some snaps, what the heck?

Ragged Robin 09-14-2014 05:49 PM

he's not ready to play

TribalElder 09-14-2014 05:49 PM

http://i.imgur.com/DBt8Zkd.gif

chiefs1111 09-14-2014 05:50 PM

I know i saw him out there at least once

Chief_For_Life58 09-14-2014 05:52 PM

Ive seen him

KCrockaholic 09-14-2014 05:54 PM

Yeah he was dropping into coverage, because that's smart.

Buzz 09-14-2014 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief_For_Life58 (Post 10914475)
Ive seen him

On the side line?

jd1020 09-14-2014 05:59 PM

There's no place for him on the field.

He can't cover. He can't defend the run. There's literally only a handful of plays in any given week where he should/could be on the field. Unless Hali or Houston take a dive with an injury you wont see him much until the Chiefs either cut Hali next year or watch Houston walk for a 3rd round comp pick in 2016.

Buzz 09-14-2014 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 10914488)
Yeah he was dropping into coverage, because that's smart.


So we drafted a quick foot pass rusher that drops back into pass coverage and only makes it on the field for a couple of plays, makes sense.

OldSchool 09-14-2014 06:02 PM

I saw him jump on a pile.

Good thing we drafted him . . .

Chiefs4TheWin 09-14-2014 06:31 PM

To think, this was the "best player available". Guy doesn't even play 90% of the game.

Chief Pote 09-14-2014 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs4TheWin (Post 10914738)
To think, this was the "best player available". Guy doesn't even play 90% of the game.

You meant to say he only plays 10% of the game?

OldSchool 09-14-2014 06:48 PM

I mean, we could have had several DBs who would be starting for us right now and playing well, but who needs guys who can cover in the secondary?

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 06:50 PM

JFC.

Last year, Eric Fisher didn't look like he even belonged on a team as a backup. This year, he looks like he will end up a solid left tackle.

Can we please stop with this ridiculous horse shit that players have to be NFL ready right away? Especially when we're talking about players in positions of low positional value. I think it really shows the stupidity of the NFLPA's decision to shorten offseason training camps. Rookies seem to take longer to adjust to the speed of the game.

I'm not crazy about Ford right now. But I also was REALLY not crazy about Knile Davis, Fisher, or Kelce in game 2 of last year 2oo.

KCrockaholic 09-14-2014 06:50 PM

He's also a shitty tackler fwiw.

We basically drafted Elvis Dumervil in the 1st round and then we're using him to drop into coverage.

Rausch 09-14-2014 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914824)
Can we please stop with this ridiculous horse shit that players have to be NFL ready right away? Especially when we're talking about players in positions of low positional value.

THEN WHY ARE WE USING FIRST ROUND PICKS ON THESE PLAYERS?

THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE ABLE TO PRODUCE IMMEDIATELY!

Rausch 09-14-2014 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10914813)
I mean, we could have had several DBs who would be starting for us right now and playing well, but who needs guys who can cover in the secondary?

The guy we should have picked is playing for the Bengals...

OldSchool 09-14-2014 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10914833)
The guy we should have picked is playing for the Bengals...

Or Chargers, or Broncos, or the 49ers. Either one of those would have been a great addition.

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10914831)
THEN WHY ARE WE USING FIRST ROUND PICKS ON THESE PLAYERS?

THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE ABLE TO PRODUCE IMMEDIATELY!

I don't understand why this is so damn important to people. Why does it matter if it takes one year for a player to be ready.

KCrockaholic 09-14-2014 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10914833)
The guy we should have picked is playing for the Bengals...

Especially considering we let Flowers walk.

Easy 6 09-14-2014 06:54 PM

Reid is lacking, but Sutton flat out sucks... did we even hit this Fivehead?

4 active Pro Bowlers and they couldnt even sniff his jock... this guys gotta go, we can talk about Reid later, but Sutton has to go. I certainly hope Dorsey offers up a sacrificial lamb in the form of one Sob Button this year, waaaaaaay too much talent for that side of the ball to be so ineffective.

ChiTown 09-14-2014 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914824)
JFC.

Last year, Eric Fisher didn't look like he even belonged on a team as a backup. This year, he looks like he will end up a solid left tackle.

Can we please stop with this ridiculous horse shit that players have to be NFL ready right away? Especially when we're talking about players in positions of low positional value. I think it really shows the stupidity of the NFLPA's decision to shorten offseason training camps. Rookies seem to take longer to adjust to the speed of the game.

I'm not crazy about Ford right now. But I also was REALLY not crazy about Knile Davis, Fisher, or Kelce in game 2 of last year 2oo.

Solid at 1:1? Well, let's throw a ****ing party! Yes, please stop yourself. JFC, our fans have battered wife syndrome.

staylor26 09-14-2014 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914824)
JFC.

Last year, Eric Fisher didn't look like he even belonged on a team as a backup. This year, he looks like he will end up a solid left tackle.

Can we please stop with this ridiculous horse shit that players have to be NFL ready right away? Especially when we're talking about players in positions of low positional value. I think it really shows the stupidity of the NFLPA's decision to shorten offseason training camps. Rookies seem to take longer to adjust to the speed of the game.

I'm not crazy about Ford right now. But I also was REALLY not crazy about Knile Davis, Fisher, or Kelce in game 2 of last year 2oo.

Great point. I don't think people understand how much that effects rookies early on. People just don't get it though man. All I care about when it comes to rookies/draft picks is seeing progress and improvement from week to week and then season to season.

Deberg_1990 09-14-2014 06:55 PM

Ford will be nails in 2017!

Easy 6 09-14-2014 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 10914844)
Especially considering we let Flowers walk.

**** Flowers, he wouldnt have changed shit today.

OldSchool 09-14-2014 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 10914850)
Reid is lacking, but Sutton flat out sucks... did we even hit this Fivehead?

4 active Pro Bowlers and they couldnt even sniff his jock... this guys gotta go, we can talk about Reid later, but Sutton has to go. I certainly hope Dorsey offers up a sacrificial lamb in the form of one Sob Button this year, waaaaaaay too much talent for that side of the ball to be so ineffective.

Maybe our "pro-bowlers" aren't actually all that great?

notorious 09-14-2014 06:57 PM

I will start to judge during the last 1/4 of the season.

KCrockaholic 09-14-2014 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 10914858)
**** Flowers, he wouldnt have changed shit today.

No, but if that was the plan, to let him go, why wouldn't you try to replace that player rather than force an unprepared Ron Parker?

KCrockaholic 09-14-2014 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10914859)
Maybe our "pro-bowlers" aren't actually all that great?

Pro bowl means nothing these days tbh

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 10914854)
Solid at 1:1? Well, let's throw a ****ing party! Yes, please stop yourself. JFC, our fans have battered wife syndrome.

That's pretty funny.

I never liked the pick at 1.1.

But it makes sense that you'll call me out for that and not for the laughable overreactionary majority that were even questioning why he even made the roster last year. And that believed Fisher would be out of a job in a few years.

Raiderhater 09-14-2014 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 10914850)
Reid is lacking, but Sutton flat out sucks... did we even hit this Fivehead?

4 active Pro Bowlers and they couldnt even sniff his jock... this guys gotta go, we can talk about Reid later, but Sutton has to go. I certainly hope Dorsey offers up a sacrificial lamb in the form of one Sob Button this year, waaaaaaay too much talent for that side of the ball to be so ineffective.

Poe got a sack.

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 10914864)
No, but if that was the plan, to let him go, why wouldn't you try to replace that player rather than force an unprepared Ron Parker?

How about maybe this year isn't a "win now" year, nor should it have been.

KCrockaholic 09-14-2014 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914873)
How about maybe this year isn't a "win now" year, nor should it have been.

What makes next year different than this year? We have a 30 year old QB, and Jamaal will be 28 next year.

Raiderhater 09-14-2014 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914873)
How about maybe this year isn't a "win now" year, nor should it have been.

I have no problem with that. It does not mean that you do not even attempt to address the problem issues from last season. Our big three were secondary, WR and OL. We did Jack shit to improve those areas. That is inexcusable win now mode or not.

Rausch 09-14-2014 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 10914844)
Especially considering we let Flowers walk.

Which makes it even more stupid.

THIS was the year we were in position to take a talented CB/S. The S position didn't fall to us but the CB position did.

NEXT YEAR is the solid draft for pass rushers. This year there were really only 4 guys worthy of being picked in the first 2 rounds. Very weak.

So we take a guy we don't need for a year in a weak draft for that position and pass on a guy who could come in and contribute immediately.

People don't seem to understand this point. The draft is a game unto itself. It's an art. It's not just who you take but when you take them.

Cleveland didn't just $3it their pants and take Johnny Football. They took (arguably) one of the best O line prospects in the draft, waited, AND got Johnny Football.

Need AND value. Not one or the other. Both.

Dorsey could have done the same. We could have gone CB or WR or O line in the first. All would have given us value AND filled a need.

KCrockaholic 09-14-2014 07:05 PM

This year was loaded with WR and CB talent. And then we took Philip Gaines who's so shitty he can't even see the field on a secondary that featured Dan Sorenson last week.

Chiefs4TheWin 09-14-2014 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefButthurt (Post 10914800)
You meant to say he only plays 10% of the game?

That's another way of putting it. Yes :)

OldSchool 09-14-2014 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 10914886)
What makes next year different than this year? We have a 30 year old QB, and Jamaal will be 28 next year.

Cause even though we might have about 8 starters who are good enough to win a championship with, the rest are far from good enough. And now we lost 1 of those guys for the season and two others are dinged up and might be out a few weeks.

Rausch 09-14-2014 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914873)
How about maybe this year isn't a "win now" year, nor should it have been.

EVERY year should be a win now year.

Every team outside of KC seems to understand this.

This is not 1980. You can turn a team completely around in one year and win a SB with second year players in key positions...

HonestChieffan 09-14-2014 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914824)
JFC.

Last year, Eric Fisher didn't look like he even belonged on a team as a backup. This year, he looks like he will end up a solid left tackle.

Can we please stop with this ridiculous horse shit that players have to be NFL ready right away? Especially when we're talking about players in positions of low positional value. I think it really shows the stupidity of the NFLPA's decision to shorten offseason training camps. Rookies seem to take longer to adjust to the speed of the game.

I'm not crazy about Ford right now. But I also was REALLY not crazy about Knile Davis, Fisher, or Kelce in game 2 of last year 2oo.

It wouldn't be CP if we didn't rag every pick and call for the death of the GM every week along with scattered stupid Hunt hate comments. And today, add in blame the refs cause Payton Manning is a HOF QB

Molitoth 09-14-2014 07:06 PM

Fire. Bob. Sutton.


Next banner.

Rausch 09-14-2014 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 10914854)
Solid at 1:1? Well, let's throw a ****ing party! Yes, please stop yourself. JFC, our fans have battered wife syndrome.

Chiefs fans are like the guy from Momento.

Every year is a rebuilding year. Every year is not the year to "win now."

And if the truth is discovered create an excuse or lie to make it ok...

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10914890)
Which makes it even more stupid.

THIS was the year we were in position to take a talented CB/S. The S position didn't fall to us but the CB position did.

NEXT YEAR is the solid draft for pass rushers. This year there were really only 4 guys worthy of being picked in the first 2 rounds. Very weak.

So we take a guy we don't need for a year in a weak draft for that position and pass on a guy who could come in and contribute immediately.

People don't seem to understand this point. The draft is a game unto itself. It's an art. It's not just who you take but when you take them.

Cleveland didn't just $3it their pants and take Johnny Football. They took (arguably) one of the best O line prospects in the draft, waited, AND got Johnny Football.

Need AND value. Not one or the other. Both.

Dorsey could have done the same. We could have gone CB or WR or O line in the first. All would have given us value AND filled a need.

If Dee Ford ends up being a good pass rusher, he's a good pick. Period. I'm not convinced he will be, but he plays a very critical position.

Drafting for need is the same strategy we pull every ****ing year. We yelled BPA from the top of our lungs, and now all of a sudden we're back to drafting for need.

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10914905)
EVERY year should be a win now year.

Every team outside of KC seems to understand this.

This is not 1980. You can turn a team completely around in one year and win a SB with second year players in key positions...

That's hilarious.

LiL stumppy 09-14-2014 07:10 PM

I wish we could find a way to get him on the field in place of DJ. I can dream though. He will be a solid player, it's aggravating he will not produce much help this year, but it's a good long term pick.

Chiefs4TheWin 09-14-2014 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914921)
If Dee Ford ends up being a good pass rusher, he's a good pick. Period. I'm not convinced he will be, but he plays a very critical position.

Drafting for need is the same strategy we pull every ****ing year. We yelled BPA from the top of our lungs, and now all of a sudden we're back to drafting for need.

Was he honestly the BPA? I think that's where I'm iffy.

KCrockaholic 09-14-2014 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914921)
If Dee Ford ends up being a good pass rusher, he's a good pick. Period. I'm not convinced he will be, but he plays a very critical position.

Drafting for need is the same strategy we pull every ****ing year. We yelled BPA from the top of our lungs, and now all of a sudden we're back to drafting for need.

Dee Ford wasn't BPA is the problem.

ChiTown 09-14-2014 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10914905)
EVERY year should be a win now year.

Every team outside of KC seems to understand this.

This is not 1980. You can turn a team completely around in one year and win a SB with second year players in key positions...

No it's outrageous to think you should win now coming off a year you go to the playoffs. Plain stupid! Slow the momentum, get rid of all trash, add a lot of new garbage, and let's start over.

Whiskey
Tango
Foxtrot

Easy 6 09-14-2014 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiderhader (Post 10914871)
Poe got a sack.

Did he no shit? I must've already given up and was making some dinner at that point.

Glad to hear he hasnt packed it in yet, was beginning to wonder about him.

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10914903)
Cause even though we might have about 8 starters who are good enough to win a championship with, the rest are far from good enough. And now we lost 1 of those guys for the season and two others are dinged up and might be out a few weeks.

I started laughing so hard I farted and shit in my pants.

These 8 starters are good enough to win a championship with? We were missing 3 pro bowlers today and we almost beat the new and improved AFC champions. We played our entire bench last year and almost beat a team that the next week went on to crush Cincinnati in the playoffs.

I like Charles, Berry, DJ, Hali, etc... but these guys haven't won shit for us. Anybody who thinks this year was the year to start building a championship winner is kidding themselves.

FloridaMan88 09-14-2014 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10914905)
EVERY year should be a win now year.

Every team outside of KC seems to understand this.

This is not 1980. You can turn a team completely around in one year and win a SB with second year players in key positions...

THIS X one million.

Raiderhater 09-14-2014 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 10914954)
Did he no shit? I must've already given up and was making some dinner at that point.

Glad to hear he hasnt packed it in yet, was beginning to wonder about him.

Manning folded like Cassel. It was pretty. But in the end obviously not enough.

FloridaMan88 09-14-2014 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914962)
Anybody who thinks this year was the year to start building a championship winner is kidding themselves.

So what year is?

2017?

2018?

Alert us when the Chiefs will be ready to be a "win now" team.

And before you answer keep in mind the Chiefs just gave a $68 million contract extension to their 30 year old starting QB.

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs4TheWin (Post 10914944)
Was he honestly the BPA? I think that's where I'm iffy.

I am not a fan of the Ford pick. But we won't know that until we give him some damn time to show what he is at all.

When you're talking about high positional value players in the low first round, you are often betting on some of the upside risk. I am much more happy with this pick than a conservative pick for, say, an o-lineman which would have helped us immensely for now but it's the same layup bullshit we do ever year including last year.

Chief_For_Life58 09-14-2014 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10914556)
There's no place for him on the field.

He can't cover. He can't defend the run. There's literally only a handful of plays in any given week where he should/could be on the field. Unless Hali or Houston take a dive with an injury you wont see him much until the Chiefs either cut Hali next year or watch Houston walk for a 3rd round comp pick in 2016.

Kill me now

Rausch 09-14-2014 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914921)
If Dee Ford ends up being a good pass rusher, he's a good pick. Period. I'm not convinced he will be, but he plays a very critical position.

Drafting for need is the same strategy we pull every ****ing year. We yelled BPA from the top of our lungs, and now all of a sudden we're back to drafting for need.

Here's the thing: Dee Ford wasn't even the BPA.

If he was your argument has legs.

It doesn't because there were better players on the board when we picked...

Rausch 09-14-2014 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914937)
That's hilarious.

Which part do you disagree with?

milkman 09-14-2014 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10914921)
If Dee Ford ends up being a good pass rusher, he's a good pick. Period. I'm not convinced he will be, but he plays a very critical position.

Drafting for need is the same strategy we pull every ****ing year. We yelled BPA from the top of our lungs, and now all of a sudden we're back to drafting for need.

You can argue startegy all you want, Rufus, but there's no way in hell a project player is the best player available.

And make no mistake about it, Dee Ford, with nothing more than a quick first step in his arsenal, is a project.

And that is also exactly what Fisher was.

Cheater5 09-14-2014 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 10914954)
Did he no shit? I must've already given up and was making some dinner at that point.

Glad to hear he hasnt packed it in yet, was beginning to wonder about him.

Hali got the sack, not Poe.

OldSchool 09-14-2014 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10915002)
Here's the thing: Dee Ford wasn't even the BPA.

If he was your argument has legs.

It doesn't because there were better players on the board when we picked...

Pretty much this. Ford wasn't even the best OLB prospect available at our pick, Attaochu was heads and shoulders above him.

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 10914979)
So what year is?

2017?

2018?

Alert us when the Chiefs will be ready to be a "win now" team.

And before you answer keep in mind the Chiefs just gave a $68 million contract extension to their 30 year old starting QB.

The Chiefs have 11 picks next year and an increasingly flexible payroll. I've already said that for the Chiefs to make a run, it starts next year. And that includes drafting a QB so Smith can easily hand the torch off to extend that window further.

For as much as we talk about this awesome 8-player nucleus of Pioli/Kuharich players we built around, so far in games where primarily Dorsey guys have played, we've played incredibly close games against San Diego, Indy (playoffs), and Denver (arguably best team in the AFC). If our draft picks improve this year, we draft smart next year, and we bring in some solid free agents, why couldn't we?

I've said before I'm nervous about Dorsey's talent evaluation. But next year sets up nicely to start attacking.

Easy 6 09-14-2014 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiderhader (Post 10914977)
Manning folded like Cassel. It was pretty. But in the end obviously not enough.

Yeah, thats a great sign for Poe no doubt... but with Hali, Houston and Berry (atleast for a while) thats just not enough.

How does so much talent get stymied so often, no matter the caliber of competition?... Sob Button, thats how... he couldnt find a way for his impact #1 pick to make an impact either.

I need blood on the alter, and Bob is IT.

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10915009)
Which part do you disagree with?

I think you need to take a good long look at how Denver and Seattle have actually built their teams.

They spend a lot of off seasons doing very little and building through the draft. Why do you think Denver's payroll was so ridiculously low this year before they made their huge free agent haul?

Rausch 09-14-2014 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10915020)
Pretty much this. Ford wasn't even the best OLB prospect available at our pick, Attaochu was heads and shoulders above him.

Not only that but BPA means at any position.

Now, of course, that's within reason. No punters or kickers or FB's or stupid $3it like that.

ChiTown 09-14-2014 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10915012)
You can argue startegy all you want, Rufus, but there's no way in hell a project player is the best player available.

And make no mistake about it, Dee Ford, with nothing more than a quick first step in his arsenal, is a project.

And that is also exactly what Fisher was.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Rufus Dawes. Almost forgot about him. Perfect likeness. Bravo!

Raiderhater 09-14-2014 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 10915029)
Yeah, thats a great sign for Poe no doubt... but with Hali, Houston and Berry (atleast for a while) thats just not enough.

How does so much talent get stymied so often, no matter the caliber of competition?... Sob Button, thats how... he couldnt find a way for his impact #1 pick to make an impact either.

I need blood on the alter, and Bob is IT.

I have zero problem with holding him accountable when he refuses to properly rotate his big men to keep them fresh and healthy. Burn him at the stake. You bring the matches I'll bring he gas.

Rausch 09-14-2014 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10915031)
I think you need to take a good long look at how Denver and Seattle have actually built their teams.

They spend a lot of off seasons doing very little and building through the draft. Why do you think Denver's payroll was so ridiculously low this year before they made their huge free agent haul?

Because the last few years (after the Pat-tard left) they have done an excellent job drafting.

Drafting for BOTH need AND value AND not having any huge busts.

Notice how winning team also identifies their franchise QB and then DRAFTS TALENT TO SUPPORT FRANCHISE QB.

We did the opposite. Other than Fisher what have we done to support our franchise QB?

Fisher and a mid-round TE. That's ****ing it...

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10915012)
You can argue startegy all you want, Rufus, but there's no way in hell a project player is the best player available.

And make no mistake about it, Dee Ford, with nothing more than a quick first step in his arsenal, is a project.

And that is also exactly what Fisher was.

So what you're saying is that if we have to choose between a high risk / high reward player vs. a low ceiling but more NFL ready right away, we should go with the latter?

I hated taking a LT last year. But no doubt you go with Fisher over Joeckl, even if Joeckl is more NFL ready. This is the same shit that would have had us passing on Dontari Poe and Branden Albert. And we bagged on this guys when they first started out first.

CP gets pissy that our front office doesn't take chances then when we take chances, we want more NFL ready. It's ****ing stupid.

And no, I'm not crazy about the Ford pick. I'm pissy about how many people on here think it's a bad idea to take a 3-4 OLB even if it takes a year for that guy to develop. Assuming he has true first round talent which I'm not convinced Ford does.

Rausch 09-14-2014 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiderhader (Post 10915045)
I have zero problem with holding him accountable when he refuses to properly rotate his big men to keep them fresh and healthy. Burn him at the stake. You bring the matches I'll bring he gas.

I think he's no 3 on my list of what's wrong with our team.

Here's how terri-bad the situation is: our DC deserves to be fired an he's still not as big a failure as the GM or HC/OC...

Raiderhater 09-14-2014 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10915061)
I think he's no 3 on my list of what's wrong with our team.

Here's how terri-bad the situation is: our DC deserves to be fired an he's still not as big a failure as the GM or HC/OC...

To be fair to myself, I meant (but did not clarify) holding him accountable for the defensive issues. In particular to the subject at hand of a lack of pressure on the QB.

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 10915037)
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Rufus Dawes. Almost forgot about him. Perfect likeness. Bravo!

I am as fair and balanced as they come.

I'm sorry that the unbelievable exaggerated negativity gets a free pass around here. Today, we saw a team missing 7-8 starters/contributors, 3 pro bowlers, 18 of 21 starters being Dorsey guys come one play away from winning against arguably the best team in the AFC ON THE ROAD. And yet nobody's going to call out the guys who said Eric Fisher would be out of the league. People STILL calling him out even though he played decent today. That we have the worst offensive line in the league. That we're the worst team in the NFL and destined for 2-14. That call Alex Smith one of the worst starting QBs in the league.

Yup, that's fair.

Buzz 09-14-2014 07:56 PM

If it's a learning curve, Fisher was on the field last year, Ford you have to look for to even find in a couple of play's. I don't get it, he's a first round pick and should be on the field more than he is. A first round pick should not be a project you bring along.

Rausch 09-14-2014 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10915112)
People STILL calling him out even though he played decent today. That we have the worst offensive line in the league.

Which is why the first pick in the draft isn't cut much slack.

When two guards fail horribly, YOU give up the sack, the best that can be said is your failure is less than theirs...

OldSchool 09-14-2014 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10915217)
Which is why the first pick in the draft isn't cut much slack.

When two guards fail horribly, YOU give up the sack, the best that can be said is your failure is less than theirs...

Fisher didn't give up a sack though. He gave up a hit to Ware, but not a sack.

dannybcaitlyn 09-14-2014 08:01 PM

I hope he doesn't end up like Aaron maybin of the bills.

carcosa 09-14-2014 08:02 PM

With 100% of my heart and soul, I wish we had drafted Teddy Bridgewater.

chiefzilla1501 09-14-2014 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10915217)
Which is why the first pick in the draft isn't cut much slack.

When two guards fail horribly, YOU give up the sack, the best that can be said is your failure is less than theirs...

I hated the pick. I still despise it.

But that's not what's being argued here. There are people so irrationally negative that there were actually comments that Fisher would be out of a job in a few years. And that his Paris Harrelson disaster last year was who he is as a player. And then to back it up, they'll talk about 2 or 3 players where a mistake was made.

That's not commenting on the pick or living up to the pick. It was a stupid pick and he'll never live up to it. Nobody calls out people who judge a player way too early in their career which happens all the time.

OldSchool 09-14-2014 08:02 PM

Who wants to bet that Dorsey lets Bailey walk and takes a 5-tech with our 1st pick? ROFL

Well, not that Bailey is a huge loss, it'll just be funny to see people shit themselves over another high 1st round DL player.

Mr. Laz 09-14-2014 08:03 PM

I saw Ford shy away from contact on a sweep. He might have been able to get a piece of the runner and he stopped.

very disappointing

OldSchool 09-14-2014 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 10915235)
With 100% of my heart and soul, I wish we had drafted Teddy Bridgewater.

Because he beat out Matt Cassel for the starting role so . . . Oh wait.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.