ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Would You Welcome the Chiefs Leaving to Rid Yourself of the Hunts? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=289107)

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-12-2014 06:28 PM

Would You Welcome the Chiefs Leaving to Rid Yourself of the Hunts?
 
Bill Simmons' column on Daniel Snyder made me think about this again.

Over the last forty years there have been two consistent themes with the Chiefs: futility and the Hunt family.

If you were presented with the option of the Chiefs leaving for LA and getting a new franchise in Kansas City in 2018 would you take that deal, or is your loyalty to the Chiefs alone too great?

Rain Man 12-12-2014 06:29 PM

Who gets the uniforms? It's the uniform that I'm loyal to.

TimBone 12-12-2014 06:30 PM

That's a solid question. Honestly, with how the NFL has been, I'd probably just walk away if the Chiefs left KC.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-12-2014 06:31 PM

Wait. If the Chiefs went to LA sans the Hunts, I would still be a Chiefs man.

If the Chiefs take the hunts with them to LA, **** that noise; I'd embrace the new franchise post-haste.

Marcellus 12-12-2014 06:31 PM

Ownership is not the issue period. Clark has spent a ton of $ trying to turn this around.

007 12-12-2014 06:31 PM

Doesn't matter. Both would be nothing but 8-8 teams.

The Franchise 12-12-2014 06:32 PM

I'd follow the team to LA....and then watch as the expansion team won a ****ing Superbowl after drafting a QB in the 1st round.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-12-2014 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 11187744)
Doesn't matter. Both would be nothing but 8-8 teams.

If the new franchise were to demolish Arrowhead and build elsewhere, it would probably win championships in short order.

cdcox 12-12-2014 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11187743)
Ownership is not the issue period. Clark has spent a ton of $ trying to turn this around.

If he set fire to the money as an offerings to the Gods instead of giving it to a legitimate QB we would be pissed.

I'm pissed.

007 12-12-2014 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Williams (Post 11187753)
If the new franchise were to demolish Arrowhead and build elsewhere, it would probably win championships in short order.

You honestly think, if the Hunts left for LA, the new owner would get a new stadium? LMAO

Mr. Flopnuts 12-12-2014 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11187743)
Ownership is not the issue period. Clark has spent a ton of $ trying to turn this around.

Agreed.

Silock 12-12-2014 06:37 PM

Expansion worked out for the Ravens. Not so much for the Browns.

Easy 6 12-12-2014 06:37 PM

I always have and always will steadfastly maintain that talk of Clark "not wanting to win" is straight garbage... the guy has done nothing but go after the so called ELITE of what was currently available to run his team since the day he took over, sparing NO expense to bring them aboard.

He's not a GM.
He's not a Head Coach.

He understands that, as opposed to guys like Jerruh and Snyder and I DO appreciate that... the Hunt legacys problem, to include Clark, is being a hands off loyalist to a fault, not being enough of a hardass whose foot feels all warm and comfy in his underlings asses.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-12-2014 06:38 PM

Jerry Jones has a lot of money. Money and throwing it around like a Jamaican sailor in Dutch port isn't the issue. It's the choices you make with that money.

And if you don't live, eat, sleep, and breathe this league, if you aren't gifted with a bit of inventiveness and vision, all of the oil money on earth isn't going to do a damned thing for you.

Marcellus 12-12-2014 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 11187755)
If he set fire to the money as an offerings to the Gods instead of giving it to a legitimate QB we would be pissed.

I'm pissed.

Fine but Clark has not been his Dad and being loyal to a fault though he is getting the blame for his Dad's faults.

Its a bit early into the Clark tenure to say he is his dad.

007 12-12-2014 06:38 PM

doesn't matter. The only expansion the NFL will look at is overseas. If the Chiefs were to move to LA there would be no more football here.

The Franchise 12-12-2014 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11187760)
I always have and always will steadfastly maintain that talk of Clark "not wanting to win" is straight garbage... the guy has done nothing but go after the so called ELITE of what was currently available to run his team since the day he took over, sparing NO expense to bring them aboard.

He's not a GM.
He's not a Head Coach.

He understands that, as opposed to guys like Jerruh and Snyder and I DO appreciate that... the Hunt legacys problem, to include Clark, is being a hands off loyalist to a fault, not being enough of a hardass whose foot feels all warm and comfy in his underlings asses.

You don't think he had any hand in the "trade for Alex Smith and put butts back in the seats" shit that we're going through right now?

Mr. Flopnuts 12-12-2014 06:38 PM

For those of us with no real ties to KC, I don't think it's a deal breaker. Everyone else I expect it would be.

TimBone 12-12-2014 06:39 PM

I believe that Clark has really tried since he took over.

The Franchise 12-12-2014 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 11187766)
For those of us with no real ties to KC, I don't think it's a deal breaker. Everyone else I expect it would be.

If the Chiefs moved to LA....it would just enable me to go more home games than I currently do right now.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-12-2014 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 11187756)
You honestly think, if the Hunts left for LA, the new owner would get a new stadium? LMAO

Look brah, 5 million Max Von Sydow's chanting in unison couldn't exercise that flop-house.

If new owner is smart, he'd build elsewhere.

cdcox 12-12-2014 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11187762)
Fine but Clark has not been his Dad and being loyal to a fault though he is getting the blame for his Dad's faults.

Its a bit early into the Clark tenure to say he is his dad.

He said in 2007 that it was time for the Chiefs to draft and develop their own QB. Then he hired to regimes that did just the opposite. His own faults are enough.

Marcellus 12-12-2014 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Williams (Post 11187761)
Jerry Jones has a lot of money. Money and throwing it around like a Jamaican sailor in Dutch port isn't the issue. It's the choices you make with that money.

And if you don't live, eat, sleep, and breathe this league, if you aren't gifted with a bit of inventiveness and vision, all of the oil money on earth isn't going to do a damned thing for you.


So Reid and Dorsey were just throwing money to the wind or trying to build a contender?

KCrockaholic 12-12-2014 06:42 PM

There's nothing wrong with the Hunt family or Clark Hunt himself. He's proven to us that he cares. He went out and paid Andy Reid. A man he expected to do great things and was a proven head coach. The Hunt family is not the problem. Clark has proven that.

007 12-12-2014 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 11187771)
He said in 2007 that it was time for the Chiefs to draft and develop their own QB. Then he hired to regimes that did just the opposite. His own faults are enough.

I was just about to post the same thing.

Mr. Flopnuts 12-12-2014 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11187768)
If the Chiefs moved to LA....it would just enable me to go more home games than I currently do right now.

My wife wants to move to Socal so bad on the water that I'd end up selling timeshare in Palm Springs. Horrible ****ing life I'm sure...

KCrockaholic 12-12-2014 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 11187771)
He said in 2007 that it was time for the Chiefs to draft and develop their own QB. Then he hired to regimes that did just the opposite. His own faults are enough.

Two. Two. 2.

stonedstooge 12-12-2014 06:43 PM

Been a Chiefs fan since their formation back in the 60's. Had season tickets for 6 years, have always followed them and not missed many games over those decades. With the direction the NFL is headed and the sour taste still in my mouth from the Pioli years, I could give a rat's ass if they move, or if the NFL would end up shutting down (which I think will happen, just not in my lifetime).

Marcellus 12-12-2014 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 11187771)
He said in 2007 that it was time for the Chiefs to draft and develop their own QB. Then he hired to regimes that did just the opposite. His own faults are enough.

2007 he inherited what was here. He is on his 2nd GM and they are in year 2.

The Franchise 12-12-2014 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 11187779)
My wife wants to move to Socal so bad on the water that I'd end up selling timeshare in Palm Springs. Horrible ****ing life I'm sure...

Just think about that cost of living increase. JFC.

cdcox 12-12-2014 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 11187781)
Two. Two. 2.

The Hunts have made me unfamiliar with W's.

The Franchise 12-12-2014 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11187784)
2007 he inherited what was here. He is on his 2nd GM and they are in year 2.

And we've still yet to draft and develop our own QB.

cdcox 12-12-2014 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11187784)
2007 he inherited what was here. He is on his 2nd GM and they are in year 2.

WHERE IS MY HOMEGROWN QB THAT HE PROMISED ME?????

The Franchise 12-12-2014 06:46 PM

7 ****ing years and his two GMs have traded for retread QBs TWICE.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-12-2014 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11187774)
So Reid and Dorsey were just throwing money to the wind or trying to build a contender?

That was directed at Clark, not the people he hired.

KCrockaholic 12-12-2014 06:47 PM

This better not turn into a bash Clark Hunt thread. That man may be a business man first, football/soccer man second, but he's shown that when we want CHANGE, he makes it happen. He certainly cares about his dads team.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-12-2014 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 11187786)
The Hunts have made me unfamiliar with W's.

ROFL

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-12-2014 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 11187798)
This better not turn into a bash Clark Hunt thread. That man may be a business man first, football/soccer man second, but he's shown that when we want CHANGE, he makes it happen. He certainly cares about his dads team.

Whatever he learned, he learned from his old man.

And that info. is CLEARLY out-dated.

KCrockaholic 12-12-2014 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Williams (Post 11187803)
Whatever he learned, he learned from his old man.

And that info. is CLEARLY out-dated.

He's a fine owner. The last of my worries is Clark Hunt, and I used to question him. But he's proven to this fanbase that he cares and that he's not afraid to throw some money at good coaches. Now it's up to Andy Reid and Dorsey**** to make shit happen.

Mr. Flopnuts 12-12-2014 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11187785)
Just think about that cost of living increase. JFC.

Beautiful thing about sales is the higher prices gets me a bigger commission and off sets that. I got lucky to fall into this shit.

FloridaMan88 12-12-2014 06:53 PM

See the Cleveland Browns re-launch… as tortured as we think it is now, it can always be worse.

Easy 6 12-12-2014 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11187765)
You don't think he had any hand in the "trade for Alex Smith and put butts back in the seats" shit that we're going through right now?

I think he was persuaded by the arguments of the very successful in their previous roles people he hired, that yes, not only can Smith quickly turn us around but if we can shape him to our own needs he'll take us on a deep run.

And I'm simply not going to blame him for listening to all of those combined years of pro football experience... Smith is on TWO people, not three.

Dorsey/Reid - mostly Reid I'm sure - believed he could mold Smith into the ultimate low risk/high reward machine under his own expert tutelage and sold Clark on it. Why wouldnt Clark believe his own highly prized and paid hire to make that decision like most any good owner would?

Clarky has bent over backwards to appease this fanbase as far as I'm concerned and the people he's hired have ****ed him HARD... its time he got angry about some shit.

His GM, his Head Coach, the League... he needs to be riding ALL of their asses, using the weight his family name and money brings him, seriously. We're a league punching bag right now it seems, Clark needs to be the big money man and put his foot in some asses right now.

Coochie liquor 12-12-2014 07:49 PM

If the Chiefs left KC, they would NEVER get a new team!

Rain Man 12-12-2014 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coochie liquor (Post 11187874)
If the Chiefs left KC, they would NEVER get a new team!

Yeah, that's probably the actual real-world scenario. Team versus no team.

|Zach| 12-13-2014 04:43 PM

Easy decision for me.

Completely different team in Kansas City would be awesome. Just going by the hypothetical.

Losing the team would be a bummer but a small fraction of a bummer if you had asked me in the past. I would mostly be bummed for other friends and family who would be defestated by it.

notorious 12-13-2014 04:45 PM

Yes.

Hammock Parties 12-13-2014 04:54 PM

If the next QB is not drafted, why not?

Set a fire in our flesh.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-13-2014 04:55 PM

Would love to see a return of the KC Kings as a football team.

Marcellus 12-13-2014 05:02 PM

I have zero reason to believe the next starter for the Chiefs will be a home drafted QB.

The guys in charge have that history. To act differently is simply just being stubborn.

Reerun_KC 12-13-2014 05:02 PM

Problem is as long as the Hunts can continue to fleece the KC market with little risk of fielding a championship team. They will never leave...

It would be a dream come true if they took the Chuefs to LA and gave us another team.

RunKC 12-13-2014 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11187794)
7 ****ing years and his two GMs have traded for retread QBs TWICE.

Trading for Alex Smith in 2013 was the right move. The 2013 QB class is most likely the worst in the history of the league and everyone knew it.

We've brought a QB in every year and I think they will continue to do so especially as Alex gets older.

There is no way Alex gets $20 million in his last year under his contract. No ****ing way.

gblowfish 12-13-2014 05:05 PM

Chiefs aren't going anywhere. Neither is the Hunt Family. Owning the Chiefs is a license to print money. Chiefs are the Chicago Cubs of the NFL. As long as they make money, championships are waaaaay down the pecking order. Look, big boxes that shoot fire out of them during pregame! ooooooooo......

Lonewolf Ed 12-13-2014 05:11 PM

What would ever rid us of the PAIN, though?

milkman 12-13-2014 05:12 PM

Pipe dream.

Bugeater 12-13-2014 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 11187759)
Expansion worked out for the Ravens. Not so much for the Browns.

The Ravens weren't an expansion team. Try again.

gblowfish 12-13-2014 05:14 PM

"RED AND WHITE, MIKE" Livingston
10 Yard Loss Fuller
Tony "What's the Point" Adams
Bill Pussy
Todd Sackledge
Can't Stick With A Good Team DeBerg
Fumbles Kreig
Geriatric Montana
Oh No Bono
Elvis the Pants Wetter
Good Enough For Oakland Gannon
Tr-INT Green
The Maytag Repairman
Damen Hue-Tard
Brokie Croyle
Thiggy
Shoe Salesman Palko
Not the Good Brady (Quin)
Rent an Orton
Mark Casshole
Trick Shot Tanney
Alex Smiff....

Seen Enough???

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-13-2014 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 11188963)
"RED AND WHITE, MIKE" Livingston
10 Yard Loss Fuller
Tony "What's the Point" Adams
Bill Pussy
Todd Sackledge
Can't Stick With A Good Team DeBerg
Fumbles Kreig
Geriatric Montana
Oh No Bono
Elvis the Pants Wetter
Good Enough For Oakland Gannon
Tr-INT Green
The Maytag Repairman
Damen Hue-Tard
Brokie Croyle
Thiggy
Shoe Salesman Palko
Not the Good Brady (Quin)
Rent an Orton
Mark Casshole
Trick Shot Tanney
Alex Smiff....

Seen Enough???

I don't see a pattern forming here/Lil' Chiefy.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-13-2014 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lonewolf Ed (Post 11188956)
What would ever rid us of the PAIN, though?

Winning cures all ills, my friend.

Imagine it:

The return of the Kansas City Kings, but none of that hokey 'royal-esque' shit.

These Kings are like someone threw the gawddamned Latin Kings in to football uniforms!

They're mean, they're nasty, and they're gonna' **** SOME SHIT UP!

https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3...8XGctaWHBdf4ag

SOOOOOO down.

notorious 12-13-2014 05:21 PM

What are people wanting to hold on to?


All of the Chief's success is waaaay in the past. That's means ZERO to me.


I would be happy with a fresh start in which we can all look to the FUTURE.

Marcellus 12-13-2014 05:27 PM

There are 32 teams in the NFL, how many would you think have a major ownership advantage over KC and what are the odds the Chiefs end up better with a different owner?

Look at who is set up right now for long term success and where their QB's came from.

Indy - #1 overall, ****ing assholes.

GB- Late 1st rounder 20 teams passed on including our dumb asses

Seattle - 3rd round

NE - 6th round QB has made owner and coach look like a genius.

Pitt - Mid 1st round QB. Great pick.

Dallas - Undrafted FA QB.

Its not like the NFL is just riddled with kick ass QB's and coaches.

bevischief 12-13-2014 05:30 PM

All depends...

Titty Meat 12-13-2014 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11187743)
Ownership is not the issue period. Clark has spent a ton of $ trying to turn this around.

Yeah they've won 2 playoff games in 40 years just because.

BucEyedPea 12-13-2014 05:32 PM

I voted leave, so y'all can be happier.

Marcellus 12-13-2014 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chocolate Hog (Post 11188997)
Yeah they've won 2 playoff games in 40 years just because.


Get your facts straight.

Titty Meat 12-13-2014 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11189007)
Get your facts straight.

Oh sorry 5 playoff games in 40 years. Doesn't Mark Sanchez have the same amount of playoff wins his whole career?

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-13-2014 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chocolate Hog (Post 11189011)
Oh sorry 5 playoff games in 40 years. Doesn't Mark Sanchez have the same amount of playoff wins his whole career?

:LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL:

Roll, baby ROLL!

Marcellus 12-13-2014 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chocolate Hog (Post 11189011)
Oh sorry 5 playoff games in 40 years. Doesn't Mark Sanchez have the same amount of playoff wins his whole career?

You want Sanchez as your QB genius? That would have changed the entire Chiefs history the last 5 years?

Go back to making up imaginary scenarios in your head about kicking peoples asses.

Marcellus 12-13-2014 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Williams (Post 11189013)
:LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL:

Roll, baby ROLL!

Ever heard that saying about birds of a feather?

Titty Meat 12-13-2014 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11189020)
You want Sanchez as your QB genius? That would have changed the entire Chiefs history the last 5 years?

Go back to making up imaginary scenarios in your head about kicking peoples asses.

What does any of what you just said have to do with the point I made that this franchise the last 40 years has the same amount of playoff wins as a mediocre QB? Yet you post some stupid homer garbage about the Hunts aren't the problem because they throw money at the problem instead of actually addressing it?

Marcellus 12-13-2014 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chocolate Hog (Post 11189025)
What does any of what you just said have to do with the point I made that this franchise has the same amount of playoff wins as a mediocre QB? Yet you post some stupid homer garbage about the Hunts aren't the problem because they throw money at the problem instead of actually addressing it?


Calling people homer as a response to their opinion reminds me of a very accurate saying.

If it weren't for the weather, stupid people wouldn't have anything to talk about.

I don't expect you to get it.

Titty Meat 12-13-2014 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11189029)
Calling people homer as a response to their opinion reminds me of a very accurate saying.

If it weren't for the weather, stupid people wouldn't have anything to talk about.

I don't expect you to get it.

Are you going to backup your claim or keep diverting from the conversation?

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-13-2014 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11189029)
Calling people homer as a response to their opinion reminds me of a very accurate saying.

If it weren't for the weather, stupid people wouldn't have anything to talk about.

I don't expect you to get it.

At this point, I'd really like to know what the **** "it" is in regards to this red and gold abortion, please?

Marcellus 12-13-2014 05:48 PM

Its pretty comical really.

I understand what the franchise has missed out on.

Rodgers, Brees, and a handful of other QB's the last 10 years.

I also understand many many other teams have drafted QB's constantly and it hasn't worked for them.

Its not a black and white issue, if it were so simple every team would have had a HOF QB at the helm in the last 15 years yet only 4 have.

I would love for KC to have a Rodgers at QB right now, more than anything. But I am not naive enough to think the Hunts don't want that.

What would possibly make more money for them than having Luck or Rodgers as their QB?

Some of you guys don't connect all the dots and only use the logic you want until it gets you to the point you want to make.

If the whole belief is all Clark wants is money in his pocket, its cheaper than ever to draft a QB and pay him for 5 years. If you are winning you then show him the bank and still win and make money right?

But Clark is afraid of that right? LMAO

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-13-2014 06:03 PM

The only things Clark is afraid of are bad publicity, fan revolt, and loss of revenue.

And unfortunately, that has translated time and again in to taking the (seemingly) quick and easy path which leads to...


Someone? Clay?

ghak99 12-13-2014 06:46 PM

The Chiefs are the only reason I still watch the NFL. If they left KC, I'd be done with the league.

srvy 12-13-2014 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 11187764)
doesn't matter. The only expansion the NFL will look at is overseas. If the Chiefs were to move to LA there would be no more football here.

This ^^^

They pull up stakes and leave so long to football in KC.

Simply Red 12-13-2014 07:10 PM

Would Jeff Linkenbach stay?

Dayze 12-13-2014 07:11 PM

That

Simply Red 12-13-2014 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by srvy (Post 11189164)
This ^^^

They pull up stakes and leave so long to football in KC.

Not necessarily. The NFL profits from that town regardless of it's lower income (compared to a lot of other NFL cities) There's not a whole lot going on in KC - fat redneck fans dart toward that stadium, come season. The town would warm up to a new team fairly quickly too.

I think it'd be a fun change - personally.

Reerun_KC 12-13-2014 07:18 PM

The chuefs product is beyond stale.

So difficult to enjoy the wins or feel any emotions when they lose.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.