ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Those that have said Cutler is better than Alex Smith. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=289232)

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 11:46 AM

Those that have said Cutler is better than Alex Smith.
 
Cutler now has more INTs this season than Alex has in the last two seasons combined. Cutler has Alshon Jefferey, Brandon Marshall, and Matt Forte.
Cutler has a huge arm but the rest is just shit.

Eleazar 12-17-2014 11:53 AM

...are simply retarted.

L.A. Chieffan 12-17-2014 11:55 AM

Everybody said that, except for me. I was laughed at when I told everyone we had a better qb than Cutler

ToxSocks 12-17-2014 11:55 AM

Well now. This is certainly a thought provoking thread that won't end up as another Alex bash session.

kcfanXIII 12-17-2014 12:01 PM

I'm not the biggest Smith fan in the world, he certainly has limitations. I would rather have Smith over Cutler, simply for consistency. Cutler is undisciplined, and that leads to too many mistakes. Give me Alex and his limited arm over the big arm small brain of Cutler any day of the week, especially on Sunday.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 12:52 PM

I didn't want Cutler either. I thought Smith would be better overall but still had limitations that would have to be overcome.

Why Not? 12-17-2014 12:53 PM

Would rather have Alex Tanney over Cutler

RealSNR 12-17-2014 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11198190)
...are simply retarted.

Did tommykat hack your computer?

Hootie 12-17-2014 12:59 PM

There are about 7-10 guys that play QB in the NFL that truly distance themselves from the Cutler/Flacco/Smith tier.

The Cutler/Flacco/Smith tier are guys that all have excellent strengths and are held back due to 1 or several FATAL flaws that will pretty much prevent them from ever establishing continued playoff dominance or success unless the stars align perfectly like they did 1 season for Joe "I'm terrible at QB" Flacco.

Pasta Little Brioni 12-17-2014 01:04 PM

Can we just get someone better then?

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11198359)
Can we just get someone better then?

Maybe, but you might get someone worse? It is a roll of the dice. I didn't say it was or wasn't worth the roll.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 01:08 PM

If we had those weapons on the outside Smith and this offense might look quite a bit different. MIGHT not sure if Andy or Smith would want to affective use those weapons.

Eleazar 12-17-2014 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11198343)
Did tommykat hack your computer?

FOOOOOOO CHIT! :cuss: :cuss:

Pablo 12-17-2014 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11198368)
If we had those weapons on the outside Smith and this offense might look quite a bit different. MIGHT not sure if Andy or Smith would want to affective use those weapons.

They wouldn't be thrown to unless they were cool with just running slants all day.

Cutler/Smith; you say shitbag, I say bag o' shit. Cutler is melting down in impressive fashion this second half of the season.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 03:40 PM

Cutler has a lower floor, but a higher ceiling

Alex just hovers around the mean, constantly

No risk, no reward

Brock 12-17-2014 03:47 PM

cutler is a dunce and has no interest whatsoever in becoming a better qb.

Pablo 12-17-2014 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11198703)
Cutler has a lower floor, but a higher ceiling

Alex just hovers around the mean, constantly

No risk, no reward

They both manage to hurt their teams in their own respective ways. Cutler just makes it a point to look like he doesn't give a **** that he's hurting his team.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 03:51 PM

The Bears literally have the worst defense in football.

I'm sure Alex would win more games in Chicago.

MahiMike 12-17-2014 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A. Chieffan (Post 11198194)
Everybody said that, except for me. I was laughed at when I told everyone we had a better qb than Cutler

I didn't laugh. I laughed when all the guys on here said Cutler was worth that kind of money and didn't flinch. I knew Chicago was crazy to put that kind of contract together for that bone head.

IQ > arm strength.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 04:00 PM

Cutler is 44-39 as Chicago's starter.

You'd think he was a loser.

Easy 6 12-17-2014 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11198741)
The Bears literally have the worst defense in football.

I'm sure Alex would win more games in Chicago.

Not sure if you're trying to slam him or what, but you're actually dead on the money... they would.

So is Pablo, Smith hovers right around the mean... Smitty did give me just a tiny sliver of hope last week though. I believe it was zilla that said that the only time Smith really tries to push it downfield is when he feels his back is to the wall or in big game situations.

If Reid could only get him past that mental block he seems to have, dude would be decent enough on most occasions... but its going to take a lot more than a few deep attempts and completions against the worst team in the league to get me back on the wagon.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11198778)
Not sure if you're trying to slam him or what, but you're actually dead on the money... they would.

Given Alex's history in 24+ games...no, they wouldn't.

Cutler is basically having a Trent Green type of career in Chicago...couple winning seasons (3 in fact), couple years around .500, one really bad year.

No OL and no defense but it's all his fault!

Easy 6 12-17-2014 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11198782)
Given Alex's history in 24+ games...no, they wouldn't.

Bullshit dude, dont let your Smith hate get in the way of common sense.

Reasonably steady production most of the time > boom or bust big arm antics that continually **** his teams defense and morale.

ed* no O line for Cutler? baloney... they revamped it completely and all I read in the offseason was how happy they were to finally have given him a good one.

Pablo 12-17-2014 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 11198769)
I didn't laugh. I laughed when all the guys on here said Cutler was worth that kind of money and didn't flinch. I knew Chicago was crazy to put that kind of contract together for that bone head.

IQ > arm strength.

Yeah, they gave him a pretty ludicrous deal. Are we really the franchise to be casting insults about over-paying for shit QBs?

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 04:08 PM

44 INT's in the last 3 years for Cutler up there in Chicago.
It would be a lot easier to win if the offense wasn't turning the ball over at such an alarming rate.
Cutler will likely be cut by the Bears this off-season since they have already admitted to having buyers remorse up there.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11198792)
Bullshit dude, dont let your Smith hate get in the way of common sense.

Alex 24+: 3-36-1

Cutler 24+: 14-38

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11198796)
44 INT's in the last 3 years for Cutler up there in Chicago.

Do you think that's a lot or something?

It's not.

The Bears defense is a far bigger problem than their QB.

MahiMike 12-17-2014 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11198782)
Given Alex's history in 24+ games...no, they wouldn't.

Cutler is basically having a Trent Green type of career in Chicago...couple winning seasons (3 in fact), couple years around .500, one really bad year.

No OL and no defense but it's all his fault!

Cutler's never been anything other than a big arm. At one time he had some luck with Brandon Marshall on his team but now he can't throw with that tiny brain of his.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 11198804)
Cutler's never been anything other than a big arm.

Who wins more than he loses...

MahiMike 12-17-2014 04:10 PM

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/-DPBgqKwvDs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 04:11 PM

Playoff wins:

Alex: 1
Cutler: 1

Easy 6 12-17-2014 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11198799)
Alex 24+: 3-36-1

Cutler 24+: 14-38

A pretty loss and an ugly loss is still a loss.

Are you honestly saying that you'd swap Cutler for Smith right now if you could?

Jakemall 12-17-2014 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11198799)
Alex 24+: 3-36-1

Cutler 24+: 14-38

how many years on crappy teams each?

Who has the better overall record in the past 4 years?

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 04:16 PM

He is throwing more INTs with better weapons than most of the others that are up there with him. He has a better OL than a lot of teams as well.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 04:18 PM

Cutler is getting worse as the offense has gotten more talented around him.

keg in kc 12-17-2014 04:33 PM

I wouldn't underestimate the difference in either overall pass attempts or downfield pass attempts when it comes to analyzing Smith's interception numbers compared to Cutler. As of last week (splits haven't been updated on espn's site yet, and Cutler did have a poor game, so they'll shift some...) Smith had more than 100 fewer attempts, as well as half the attempts of Cutler with regards to passes traveling 11+ yards in the air. With those passes, the statistical difference for interception rate between the two was just 1% as of a week ago, which was a bit of a surprise to me. Double Smith's attempts in that range, at his current pick rate, and he has 4-5 more interceptions in the 11+ yard range, meaning 9-10 versus Cutler's 11.

I don't know Cutler's stats in that sense for Monday's game, but basically, Smith's pick numbers would likely be higher if he a) threw 100 more passes, and b) attempted more passes beyond 10 yards. Something which I think most of us actively want him to do, knowing full well that it will occasionally lead to a turnover.

Just Passin' By 12-17-2014 04:37 PM

Clay trolling a thread calling out Clay.


Well done

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11198821)
He has a better OL than a lot of teams as well.

LMAO

kcfanXIII 12-17-2014 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 11198850)
I wouldn't underestimate the difference in either overall pass attempts or downfield pass attempts when it comes to analyzing Smith's interception numbers compared to Cutler. As of last week (splits haven't been updated on espn's site yet, and Cutler did have a poor game, so they'll shift some...) Smith had more than 100 fewer attempts, as well as half the attempts of Cutler with regards to passes traveling 11+ yards in the air. With those passes, the statistical difference for interception rate between the two was just 1% as of a week ago, which was a bit of a surprise to me. Double Smith's attempts in that range, at his current pick rate, and he has 4-5 more interceptions in the 11+ yard range, meaning 9-10 versus Cutler's 11.

I don't know Cutler's stats in that sense for Monday's game, but basically, Smith's pick numbers would likely be higher if he a) threw 100 more passes, and b) attempted more passes beyond 10 yards. Something which I think most of us actively want him to do, knowing full well that it will occasionally lead to a turnover.

This type of statistical analysis has no place on ChiefsPlanet.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 04:44 PM

Tebow has a better record than Cutler while in Denver. :doh!:

Pablo 12-17-2014 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11198866)
LMAO

Yeah, I don't know just how amazing the Saints defense is; but Chicago's line looked very Chiefs-esque.

Mav 12-17-2014 05:03 PM

**** both of them. But if you don't think that Cutler's league leading turnovers aren't hurting his defense, then you are reeruned.

Deberg_1990 12-17-2014 05:30 PM

Rivers/Cutler/Romo.......


They are all the same guy

Easy 6 12-17-2014 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo (Post 11198915)
Yeah, I don't know just how amazing the Saints defense is; but Chicago's line looked very Chiefs-esque.

Thats all true, but its not because of a lack of effort on the Bears behalf, the stories about their revamped unit and how proud they were of it were all over the webs in camp/preseason.

IMO, a lot of that offenses troubles boils down to a lack of confidence in their QB... maybe almost like my Army days, our captain up there in Alaska was hardcore, Ranger and the whole bit, very serious and squared away.

And guess what? that unit rocked, great morale, kicked ass in the field etc.

Then I go to Ft. Campbell where the CO was thoroughly average, not a West Pointer... and we sucked during our field exercises (war games), the individual talent we definitely had couldnt make up for the shit decisions coming down from the top.

Trestman is a shitty colonel, but Cutler is an even shittier Commanding Officer... so yeah, Cutler sucks, no winning attitude present in him even to the layman observer.

ShowtimeSBMVP 12-17-2014 05:38 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>To repeat and now confirmed: Bears starting QB Jimmy Clausen over Jay Cutler on Sunday vs. Detroit, per sources.</p>&mdash; Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/545361552266645504">December 17, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In58men 12-17-2014 05:45 PM

Game managing QBs just means you're scared to compete with the opposing team.

Deberg_1990 12-17-2014 05:45 PM

Clausen lovers unite!

Easy 6 12-17-2014 05:46 PM

Wow, sooo pathetic... the robot armed franchise guy is being replaced this late in the year, I'm not sure if it says worse things about Cutler or Trestman.

For a QB guy to give up on a talent like Cutler, in an obvious attempt to keep his job... it stinks man, the Bears stink... Clausen could go 2-0 and Trestman should still lose his job for being such a lilly livered sucker for allowing himself and his bajillion dollar starter to be questioned this much.

Say hello to your new team, Jim Harbaugh... good luck lighting a fire under Jays sorry ass, you'll be wanting to draft someone else in year one, I gaurantee it.

Deberg_1990 12-17-2014 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 11199042)
Game managing QBs just means you're scared to compete with the opposing team.

But Russell Wilson

Marcellus 12-17-2014 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11198799)
Alex 24+: 3-36-1

Cutler 24+: 14-38

I have shown the BS that is this stat more times than I can count yet you keep throwing it out there like its accurate or actually means something. We have lost a bunch of games when the offense scores more than 24 when the defense gives up 40 yet it fits into your "stat". See the Indy playoff game for example.


BTW Cutler just got benched for Jimmy Clausen. LMAO

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199050)
I have shown the BS that is this stat more times than I can count yet you keep throwing it out there like its accurate or actually means something.

It sure classified Cassel and Alex as the turds they are.

Just Passin' By 12-17-2014 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 11199049)
But Russell Wilson

It's Inmem58. You can't expect better from him.

ThaVirus 12-17-2014 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 11198813)
how many years on crappy teams each?



Who has the better overall record in the past 4 years?


LMAO

Marcellus 12-17-2014 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199054)
It sure classified Cassel and Alex as the turds they are.


Because the defense gives up 44 and the offense scores 40 then the QB is a turd because he lost a game where the defense gave up more than 24 points?

You are one obstinate son of a bitch and frankly I am glad you are back on the hate wagon.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199063)
Because the defense gives up 44 and the offense scores 40 then the QB is a turd because he lost a game where the defense gave up more than 24 points?

You are one obstinate son of a bitch and frankly I am glad you are back on the hate wagon.

Facts are facts.

The better QBs have better records in that situation and it's not really up for debate. It is NFL history.

I look forward to us losing more games when the opponent scores 24+. I guarantee it keeps happening!

C3HIEF3S 12-17-2014 05:56 PM

I'm going to be in attendance for the Lions-Bears shit show this Sunday.. that one will sure be ugly.

Marcellus 12-17-2014 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199066)
Facts are facts.

The better QBs have better records in that situation and it's not really up for debate. It is NFL history.

You posses as much football knowledge as my dog Gunner.

That's a fact.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199070)
You posses as much football knowledge as my dog Gunner.

That's a fact.

There is no denying it: we are going to keep losing games if the opponent hits the 24-point mark.

You know it, I know it...Alex probably even knows it.

It is destiny.

ViperVisor 12-17-2014 06:00 PM

Cutler's career is weird. Because of it's consistency. Rating other than 1st CHI season has always been 86ish

When he was 24-25 all he needed was 10% improvement in efficiency as he went on and he would be a great QB.

That 10% improvement is basically what Alex Smith did in his career.

MMXcalibur 12-17-2014 06:01 PM

Cutler: "Eh, whatever..."

Window Licking Whiner 12-17-2014 06:04 PM

Has he thrown a TD to a receiver? How many has Alex thrown??....

ThaVirus 12-17-2014 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCtotheSB (Post 11199079)
Cutler: "Dont caaarreeee. Sooooooo don't caaarree!"


FYP.

Deberg_1990 12-17-2014 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gopack_vag (Post 11199083)
Has he thrown a TD to a receiver? How many has Alex thrown??....

Would pay many dollar to watch Smith throw to Marshall and Jeffries in an Andy Reid directed offense.

Easy 6 12-17-2014 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11199058)
LMAO

We know its hip to burn Smith fans, but really... comparing these two guys is enough to implode a skyscraper, very very little in common there.

I'm so down on Smith that only a playoff win will salvage his rep with me, but if you're casting your lot with Clay and taking Cutler over Smith... then, well, I can only pull a rear guard action for so long before I abandon you to the hounds.

OldSchool 12-17-2014 06:24 PM

Cutler was benched for Jimmy Clausen and the dumbass QB1 club still finds a way to convince themselves that he is actually better than Alex Smith. ROFL Comedy gold.

ThaVirus 12-17-2014 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11199111)
We know its hip to burn Smith fans, but really... comparing these two guys is enough to implode a skyscraper, very very little in common there.



I'm so down on Smith that only a playoff win will salvage his rep with me, but if you're casting your lot with Clay and taking Cutler over Smith... then, well, I can only pull a rear guard action for so long before I abandon you to the hounds.


The fervor with which they defend the guy is just hilarious to me.

What the two give you is not much different in the grand scheme of things. They'll give you a 9-7 team and a first round playoff exit more often than not.

Reerun_KC 12-17-2014 06:26 PM

The amount of stupid it takes to support cutler is astounding.

Reerun_KC 12-17-2014 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 11199128)
Cutler was benched for Jimmy Clausen and the dumbass QB1 club still finds a way to convince themselves that he is actually better than Alex Smith. ROFL Comedy gold.

Life losers ftw.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 11199042)
Game managing QBs just means you're scared to compete with the opposing team.

STFU

jspchief 12-17-2014 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo (Post 11198915)
Yeah, I don't know just how amazing the Saints defense is; but Chicago's line looked very Chiefs-esque.

Chicago's line is ****ing horrible. One of the worst in the league.

jspchief 12-17-2014 06:32 PM

Don't know if it was mentioned on tv last night but on the radio they said Cutler was refusing to even speak to the ocoord last night.

Dude is cancer

listopencil 12-17-2014 06:34 PM

Jay Cutler=Jeff George.

Marcellus 12-17-2014 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 11199148)
Jay Cutler=Jeff George.

I made that exact comparison when was the QB for Denver.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199151)
I made that exact comparison when was the QB for Denver.

It's a poor comparison.

Jeff George was 30 games under .500.

Reerun_KC 12-17-2014 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 11199145)
Don't know if it was mentioned on tv last night but on the radio they said Cutler was refusing to even speak to the ocoord last night.

Dude is cancer

But he throws jank ass passes down field.

Marcellus 12-17-2014 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199154)
It's a poor comparison.

Jeff George was 30 games under .500.

Which shows your football acumen includes nothing but looking at stat lines.

listopencil 12-17-2014 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199151)
I made that exact comparison when was the QB for Denver.

I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt as a rookie and early in his career. He never did stop making those cringe worthy game changing mistakes though.

Reerun_KC 12-17-2014 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 11199148)
Jay Cutler=Jeff George.

Almost exactly the same.

Both guys had talent but had a head full of dicks.

Reerun_KC 12-17-2014 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199157)
Which shows your football acumen includes nothing but looking at stat lines.

100% correct. Well said.

Marcellus 12-17-2014 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 11199162)
I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt as a rookie and early in his career. He never did stop making those cringe worthy game changing mistakes though.

It took a few seasons to show it but he absolutely refuses to change and his attitude is shit which also matched Jeff George to tee.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.