ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Would KC move up in the 2nd round? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=291602)

BlackOp 03-28-2015 05:09 PM

Would KC move up in the 2nd round?
 
Seems like there might be around 2-3 good ILB prospects available at the top of the 2nd round. With DJ trying to make a comeback..it seems like a pressing need/insurance. Would it be worth it to trade up? This is a deep draft..especially at WR so what they give up could be costly.

Hog's Gone Fishin 03-28-2015 05:14 PM

NO !!!!!!

RealSNR 03-28-2015 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 11408271)
Seems like there might be around 2-3 good ILB prospects available at the top of the 2nd round. With DJ trying to make a comeback..it seems like a pressing need/insurance. Would it be worth it to trade up? This is a deep draft..especially at WR so what they give up could be costly.

Who are these good ILB prospects?

I don't see any guys that I'd reasonably want playing all 3 downs. That includes McKinney, Perryman, and Dawson

BlackOp 03-28-2015 05:16 PM

Well...that was pretty emphatic. Ha...

Imo OL and ILB are the two weaknesses on the roster..with WR coming in 3rd.

BlackOp 03-28-2015 05:17 PM

McKinney, Perryman, and Dawson...like you mentioned..and Kendricks. He will likely be gone though.

Hog's Gone Fishin 03-28-2015 05:21 PM

TRADING UP IS DUMB !!!!

BossChief 03-28-2015 05:52 PM

In this draft? I'd love to trade down from our first and get another 3rd or even a 2nd if we can move far enough to get one. Dorsey has kicked ass in the 3rd.

Ming the Merciless 03-28-2015 05:53 PM

we should trade up to take a right tackle #1 overall

BlackOp 03-28-2015 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 11408337)
In this draft? I'd love to trade down from our first and get another 3rd or even a 2nd if we can move far enough to get one. Dorsey has kicked ass in the 3rd.

Oh..I agree with this. Not sure there will be a player at 18 that teams would want that badly though.

My post was hypothetical..many think Kendricks is the best ILB in this draft class. IF he was there at the top of the 2nd...which he most likely wont.

philfree 03-28-2015 07:18 PM

Because of the compensatory 3rd rounder we can afford to trade our 4th round pick along with our 2nd to move and get a guy. Is it a good idea? If you get your guy and he works out then yes. If he's Kawika Mitchell then no.

jd1020 03-28-2015 07:30 PM

The NFL doesn't give teams enough time to make a pick/trade for Dorsey to make a deal in time to move up for a player.

bevischief 03-28-2015 07:59 PM

Drugs are bad, OK....

Mr. Laz 03-28-2015 08:17 PM

it will be interesting to see


I get the feeling that Dorsey is a guy that doesn't trade up.

He is a quantity over quality, low-risk guy.

so is Reid

So is Alex Smith

So is Clark Hunt, come to think about it.

wazu 03-28-2015 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 11408521)
it will be interesting to see


I get the feeling that Dorsey is a guy that doesn't trade up.

He is a quantity over quality, low-risk guy.

so is Reid

So is Alex Smith

So is Clark Hunt, come to think about it.

Quantity doesn't mean a devaluation of quality. It implies humility. The belief that we have done a good job with scouting, but with the wisdom to understand that some will far exceed expectations while others fall far short.

Deberg_1990 03-28-2015 08:36 PM

They will trade their 2nd for someone

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-28-2015 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 11408521)
it will be interesting to see


I get the feeling that Dorsey is a guy that doesn't trade up.

He is a quantity over quality, low-risk guy.

so is Reid

So is Alex Smith

So is Clark Hunt, come to think about it.

Now there's some reality, I tell u whawt.

mdchiefsfan 03-28-2015 10:51 PM

I would see it more likely we trade down into the top of the second before we trade up.

Saccopoo 03-28-2015 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11408280)
Who are these good ILB prospects?

I don't see any guys that I'd reasonably want playing all 3 downs. That includes McKinney, Perryman, and Dawson

Zach Vigil, but that's about it.

kccrow 03-29-2015 12:23 AM

I'd prefer a trade down in round 1 before making a trade up in round 2, but that's not really the question.

I'd say, sure, there is one player I'd consider moving up for at ILB and that is Stephone Anthony. I think he's going to be a damn fine player in this league. He's got good size, strength, and speed, and was rock solid on Clemson's D. I wouldn't move up for any other ILB though.

If we're talking a different position, then yeah, there are quite a few guys I'd move up for if I thought they wouldn't make it to the Chiefs' selection. A handful of WRs, maybe a few OTs, several defensive players. All depends on how the board is falling.

Direckshun 03-29-2015 12:28 AM

Provided it's the best talent on the board, I would take:
  • Denzel Perryman (Miami) in the 2nd.
  • Stephone Anthony (Clemson) in the 2nd.
  • Eric Kendricks (UCLA) in the 3rd.
  • Paul Dawson (TCU) in the 3rd.
  • Taiwan Jones (Michigan State) in the 4th.
  • Hayes Pullard (USC) in the 4th
  • Mike Hull (Penn State) in the 5th.
  • Jake Ryan (Michigan) in the 5th.
  • Ben Heeney (Kansas) in the 6th.
  • Ramik Wilson (Georgia) in the 6th.
  • Zach Vigil (Utah State) in the 6th.
  • A.J. Johnson (Tennessee) in the 7th
I'd say that Perryman, Anthony, Jones, and Pullard are all three-down LBs. You could probably play Heeney, Wilson, and Vigil three downs as well, with middling results.

Dunerdr 03-29-2015 08:45 AM

I'd say it's unlikely we trade up at any point. Just based on Dorsey's history and how things are done in greenbay. They rarely give up something to get something else. But then again I was floored when I found out greenbay was secretly making a run at revis. And the fact we were to must mean he's absolutely perfect in the Ted Thompson grading system.

BigChiefFan 03-29-2015 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 11408787)
Provided it's the best talent on the board, I would take:
  • Denzel Perryman (Miami) in the 2nd.
  • Stephone Anthony (Clemson) in the 2nd.
  • Eric Kendricks (UCLA) in the 3rd.
  • Paul Dawson (TCU) in the 3rd.
  • Taiwan Jones (Michigan State) in the 4th.
  • Hayes Pullard (USC) in the 4th
  • Mike Hull (Penn State) in the 5th.
  • Jake Ryan (Michigan) in the 5th.
  • Ben Heeney (Kansas) in the 6th.
  • Ramik Wilson (Georgia) in the 6th.
  • Zach Vigil (Utah State) in the 6th.
  • A.J. Johnson (Tennessee) in the 7th
I'd say that Perryman, Anthony, Jones, and Pullard are all three-down LBs. You could probably play Heeney, Wilson, and Vigil three downs as well, with middling results.

I agree and can't see any reason to not try and get an every down ILBer. A situational ILBer seems like a waste of roster space. If we're pulling the trigger, let's go for the gusto.

Saccopoo 03-29-2015 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 11408787)
Provided it's the best talent on the board, I would take:
  • Denzel Perryman (Miami) in the 2nd.
  • Stephone Anthony (Clemson) in the 2nd.
  • Eric Kendricks (UCLA) in the 3rd.
  • Paul Dawson (TCU) in the 3rd.
  • Taiwan Jones (Michigan State) in the 4th.
  • Hayes Pullard (USC) in the 4th
  • Mike Hull (Penn State) in the 5th.
  • Jake Ryan (Michigan) in the 5th.
  • Ben Heeney (Kansas) in the 6th.
  • Ramik Wilson (Georgia) in the 6th.
  • Zach Vigil (Utah State) in the 6th.
  • A.J. Johnson (Tennessee) in the 7th
I'd say that Perryman, Anthony, Jones, and Pullard are all three-down LBs. You could probably play Heeney, Wilson, and Vigil three downs as well, with middling results.

MOTHER ****ER!!!! DAWSON ISN'T GOING TO PLAY IN A ****ING 34 FOR CHRISTS SAKE!!11!1!

STOP IT!!!

STOP IT NOW!!!!

milkman 03-29-2015 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11409034)
MOTHER ****ER!!!! DAWSON ISN'T GOING TO PLAY IN A ****ING 34 FOR CHRISTS SAKE!!11!1!

STOP IT!!!

STOP IT NOW!!!!

Can you say this with some conviction?

Saccopoo 03-29-2015 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 11408787)
Provided it's the best talent on the board, I would take:
  • Denzel Perryman (Miami) in the 2nd.
  • Stephone Anthony (Clemson) in the 2nd.
  • Eric Kendricks (UCLA) in the 3rd.
  • Paul Dawson (TCU) in the 3rd.
  • Taiwan Jones (Michigan State) in the 4th.
  • Hayes Pullard (USC) in the 4th
  • Mike Hull (Penn State) in the 5th.
  • Jake Ryan (Michigan) in the 5th.
  • Ben Heeney (Kansas) in the 6th.
  • Ramik Wilson (Georgia) in the 6th.
  • Zach Vigil (Utah State) in the 6th.
  • A.J. Johnson (Tennessee) in the 7th
I'd say that Perryman, Anthony, Jones, and Pullard are all three-down LBs. You could probably play Heeney, Wilson, and Vigil three downs as well, with middling results.

Here's the list:

1. Benardrick McKinney
2. Stephone Anthony
3. Zach Vigil
4. Denzel Perryman
5. David Mayo
6. Terrence Plummer
7. Jeff Luc (2 down)
8. Taiwan Jones (2 down)
9. AJ Tarpley
10. Ramik Wilson
11. Hayes Pullard (2 down)

Would not draft: Eric Kendricks, Paul Dawson, Ben Heeney

You get a ****ing F - for saying you'd get middling results from Vigil as a three down guy. He's very good in pass coverage, turns his hips well and has excellent functional speed on the field.

SeeingRed 03-29-2015 10:15 AM

I think trading down is the smartest thing any team can do....trading up usually doesn't work out :shake:

Mr. Laz 03-29-2015 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeeingRed (Post 11409075)
I think trading down is the smartest thing any team can do....trading up usually doesn't work out :shake:

oh bullshit

Clark luvs you

RealSNR 03-29-2015 12:02 PM

Saccopoo, I'm more and more interested in Vigil the more you talk about him.

Was wondering if you agreed with this scouting report on him from NFL.com or if you think the criticisms are mostly unwarranted given that his strengths are so high in other areas:

Quote:

STRENGTHS One of the most productive linebackers in college football. Never quits on a play. Active pass rusher who worked well in team blitz scheme. Team leader. Reads pass keys quickly and gets into coverage with depth. Shows awareness in zone and matches up with crossers in his area. Has adequate man-cover skills. Decent hips to open and run. Wrap-up tackler who brings some bang on perimeter tackles. Worker bee who plays with confidence and hustle.

WEAKNESSES Gets overwhelmed by offensive linemen. Not a take-on linebacker and below average at slipping blocks. Not as instinctive as production would indicate. Not a natural downhill player. Can get lost in crowd and washed down against run. Benefited from aggressive, attacking scheme. Marginal speed. Doesn't look to punish backs in blitz pickup.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2015/profil...gil?id=2552324

Saccopoo 03-29-2015 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11409154)
Saccopoo, I'm more and more interested in Vigil the more you talk about him.

Was wondering if you agreed with this scouting report on him from NFL.com or if you think the criticisms are mostly unwarranted given that his strengths are so high in other areas:



http://www.nfl.com/draft/2015/profil...gil?id=2552324

I'd disagree about the "doesn't take on OL" part. He'll stand dudes up. In fact, I think he stacks and sheds quite well. Actually, he seems to want to get into the linemen a bit too much at times if anything, but that doesn't necessarily translate over to him not getting off them to make the play.

I think he's one of the best at getting past the LOS and into the backfield to make the play and that's not just on called blitzes - he makes a lot of impact plays behind the los. (Opposed to say a guy like Kendricks who seems to make the majority of his tackles after/past the line of scrimmage.)

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hClFlhinakU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gs9vLz7yRMs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hvE7Lsac7s4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qOgnR5hzzIg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Eleazar 03-29-2015 01:44 PM

maybe.

Jim Lahey 03-29-2015 03:49 PM

Id be okay with trading up in the 2nd if its for Lockette which may not even be a need to do thing. Unless somebody slips in the draft, **** it. Keep what ya got.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.