ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Hall of Fame finalists announced (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=304925)

carcosa 01-03-2017 09:12 PM

Hall of Fame finalists announced
 
Who ya got?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...2017-finalists

Quote:

The 26 semifinalists for the Pro Football Hall of Fame Class of 2017 were trimmed to 15 finalists during Tuesday's Gold Jacket Finalists special on NFL Network.

The 15 modern-era finalists join three other finalists to comprise 18 finalists under consideration for the Class of 2017.

Former Seahawks safety Kenny Easley was announced as a senior finalist last August by the Seniors Committee, which reviews the qualifications of those players whose careers ended more than 25 years ago.

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones and former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue were announced as contributor finalists in August by the Hall of Fame's Contributor Committee that considers persons who made outstanding contributions to professional football other than players and coaches.


2017 Hall of Fame finalists

1. Brian Dawkins, safety (Philadelphia Eagles, 1996-2008; Denver Broncos, 2009-2011)

2. Jason Taylor, defensive end (Miami Dolphins, 1997-2007, '09, 2011; Washington Redskins, 2008; New York Jets, 2010)

3. LaDainian Tomlinson, running back (San Diego Chargers, 2001-09; New York Jets, 2010-11)

4. Morten Andersen, kicker (New Orleans Saints, 1982-1994; Atlanta Falcons, 1995-2000; 2006-07; New York Giants, 2001; Kansas City Chiefs, 2002-03; Minnesota Vikings, 2004)

5. Don Coryell, coach (St. Louis Cardinals, 1973-77; San Diego Chargers, 1978-1986)

6. Kurt Warner, quarterback (St. Louis Rams, 1998-2003; New York Giants, 2004; Arizona Cardinals, 2005-09)

7. Terrell Davis, running back (Denver Broncos, 1995-2001)

8. Isaac Bruce, wide receiver (Los Angeles Rams, 1994; St. Louis Rams, 1995-2007; San Francisco 49ers, 2008-09)

9. Terrell Owens, wide receiver (San Francisco 49ers, 1996-2003; Philadelphia Eagles, 2004-05; Dallas Cowboys, 2006-08; Buffalo Bills, 2009; Cincinnati Bengals, 2010)

10. Tony Boselli, offensive tackle (Jacksonville Jaguars, 1995-2001; Houston Texans, 2002)

11. Alan Faneca, guard (Pittsburgh Steelers, 1998-2007; New York Jets, 2008-09; Arizona Cardinals, 2010)

12. Joe Jacoby, offensive tackle (Washington Redskins, 1981-1993)

13. Ty Law, cornerback (New England Patriots, 1995-2004; New York Jets, 2005, '08; Kansas City Chiefs, 2006-07; Denver Broncos, 2009)

14. John Lynch, safety (Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 1993-2003; Denver Broncos, 2004-07)

15. Kevin Mawae, center (Seattle Seahawks, 1994-97; New York Jets, 1998-2005; Tennessee Titans, 2006-09)

DanT 01-03-2017 09:16 PM

Two of my all-time favorite non-Chiefs players to watch are on that list. Tony Boselli was a dominant offensive tackle, and Terrell Davis was such a tremendous competitor. In games either of those two were in, I would love to watch them play.

Direckshun 01-03-2017 09:20 PM

Terrell Owens should be a fun debate.

Not.

Discuss Thrower 01-03-2017 09:21 PM

Coryell and Warner. No one else should get it.

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 09:22 PM

We at least know Kurt Warner is a shoo-in

Chief Northman 01-03-2017 09:23 PM

LT for sure.
Lacklustre crop overall though.

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 12659190)
Coryell and Warner. No one else should get it.

Dawkins and Law should absolutely be in the conversation. Both were flat out dominant at their peak, played long careers, and played for winners.

Pepe Silvia 01-03-2017 09:26 PM

Tomlinson
Boselli
T.Davis
Warner
Lynch

These 5 should be in imo.

Rain Man 01-03-2017 09:26 PM

In order of deservedness, I'd go with:

1. Joe Jacoby - best tackle of his era.

2. Morten Andersen - c'mon, if he's not in no kicker should ever go in (other than Stenerud)

3. Kurt Warner - most dominant player at the most important position for several years. That's a go.

4. Ladainian Tomlinson - Okay, whatever. He scored a lot. That's fine.

5. John Lynch - Very borderline candidate, but he's the best I can find on this list.

This list is terrible, by the way. Isaac Bruce should go in after Torry Holt, though they're both legit candidates. So I can't vote for Isaac first. And where's Everson Walls and Albert Lewis and Deron Cherry? Roger Craig deserves it more than Terrell Davis, and I'd painfully put Mecklenburg in front of a bunch of these candidates.

Discuss Thrower 01-03-2017 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12659197)
Dawkins and Law should absolutely be in the conversation. Both were flat out dominant at their peak, played long careers, and played for winners.

I just remember Law for being a complete nonfactor by the time it seemed like a good idea for Herm to bring him in here.

gblowfish 01-03-2017 09:28 PM

Sorry, voting for Bolts is bad enough. I refuse to vote for ANY Donks.

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 09:31 PM

And if Ty Cobb can get into the HOF, then so should TO. I'll just throw that out there.

Arguably the best receiver during his time other than Moss. Especially since, unlike Moss, he was a much more consistent threat because he hustled on every route and blocked.

Rasputin 01-03-2017 09:34 PM

I liked Keven Mawae as a center he was a mauler. I remember thinking I wish he was a Chief and I would always trade for him on Madden.

Red Dawg 01-03-2017 09:34 PM

Anyone that says Davis is a dumbass.

carcosa 01-03-2017 09:36 PM

I'm gonna say:

Tomlinson
Andersen
Warner
Owens
And uhhhhh I dunno, Faneca?

DaneMcCloud 01-03-2017 09:37 PM

Coryell
LT
Kurt Warner
Terrell Owens

carcosa 01-03-2017 09:38 PM

Coryell would also be a good choice if only for how he was one of the founding fathers of the modern vertical offense.

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 09:38 PM

I'm surprised Lynch is getting so much attention and Dawkins isn't on anyone's radar.

Lynch was fun to watch because he hit the living shit out of people. And he was an excellent player. But Dawkins was the better safety and I would argue a lot less a product of the system.

R Clark 01-03-2017 09:38 PM

Joe jacoby then Mabey morten the rest can suck it

Amnorix 01-03-2017 09:41 PM

Kevin Mawae was a seven time first team All Pro. If that ain't enough, then what the hell is?

Warner and LT are the really obvious ones. I'll go Jason Taylor, Mawae and Ty Law (:homer:) for the others. Doubt Ty Law ever gets in for real. Hall of Very Good, probably...

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 12659230)
Kevin Mawae was a seven time first team All Pro. If that ain't enough, then what the hell is?

Warner and LT are the really obvious ones. I'll go Jason Taylor, Mawae and Ty Law (:homer:) for the others. Doubt Ty Law ever gets in for real. Hall of Very Good, probably...

Well... Lynch and Dawkins were 9 time pro bowlers, so there's that.

Rasputin 01-03-2017 09:50 PM

I believe Trent Green would be on that list had he not went down in preseason and Kurt Warner took his job. Coach Dick Vermeil ever bit could have won multiple Super Bowls with Trent Green in St Louis.

The Rick 01-03-2017 09:59 PM

Interesting take on LeRoy Butler not even getting a sniff compared to Lynch...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/GaryEllerson">@GaryEllerson</a> LeRoy Butler played 43 less games than Lynch but has 320 more tackles, 7 more sacks, 12 more INT&#39;s, &amp; 3 more FF. Why no LeRoy?</p>&mdash; James Moran (@Jiggs44) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jiggs44/status/816472672209174529">January 4, 2017</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

DaneMcCloud 01-03-2017 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 12659230)
Kevin Mawae was a seven time first team All Pro. If that ain't enough, then what the hell is?

Warner and LT are the really obvious ones. I'll go Jason Taylor, Mawae and Ty Law (:homer:) for the others. Doubt Ty Law ever gets in for real. Hall of Very Good, probably...

Will Shields was a 12 time Pro Bowler and All Pro, along with the NFL Man of the Year.

It took 5 years before he was inducted.

I think Mawae gets in sooner because he played in a media friendly market for the Jets but I hope he has to wait a few years.

Amnorix 01-03-2017 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12659238)
Well... Lynch and Dawkins were 9 time pro bowlers, so there's that.

Pro Bowl has both AFC and NFC, whereas All Pro is across the entire NFL.

DaneMcCloud 01-03-2017 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 12659270)
Pro Bowl has both AFC and NFC, whereas All Pro is across the entire NFL.

Pro Bowl is voted by the fans (1/3), coaches (1/3) and players (1/3).

All Pro's are selected by the Pro Football Writers of America, the same sports writers that select the Hall Of Fame members.

Garcia Bronco 01-03-2017 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PackerinMo (Post 12659199)
Tomlinson
Boselli
T.Davis
Warner
Lynch

These 5 should be in imo.

Take out Boselli and put in Jacoby.

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 12659270)
Pro Bowl has both AFC and NFC, whereas All Pro is across the entire NFL.

Oops. Thanks for the clarification.

Dawkins was a 4-timer
Lynch 2-timer

DaneMcCloud 01-03-2017 10:11 PM

I'll never, ever understand the Boselli love.

He only played 7 years and during that time, only started all 16 games THREE TIMES.

Furthermore, he played left tackle and didn't protect his QB's blind side because Mark Brunnell was a left handed QB.

If we're talking players whose careers ended prematurely due to injury, Terrell Davis gets the nod all day long over Boselli.

chefsos 01-03-2017 10:18 PM

I'm sort of shocked that Coryell isn't already in the HOF.

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chefsos (Post 12659312)
I'm sort of shocked that Coryell isn't already in the HOF.

Is it really a given?

Never won a Super Bowl. Was lousy in the playoffs. Only really coached offense. Do you make the HOF for being an innovator/outstanding coordinator on one side of the ball? Sure, he left an impact on the way offenses are run, but does his innovation overcome his lack of accomplishment, especially when he competes against head coaches who've won Super Bowls?

ThaVirus 01-03-2017 10:32 PM

Tomlinson is the most deserving of the bunch

DaneMcCloud 01-03-2017 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 12659337)
Tomlinson is the most deserving of the bunch

Tomlinson wouldn't have the success he had without Don Coryell.

Terry Metcalf, James Brooks, Emmitt Smith, Wilbert Montgomery, Priest Holmes, Marshall Faulk and more - All guys that benefited from playing in the Coryell before LT.

LT belongs but Coryell should have been in long ago...

BryanBusby 01-03-2017 10:35 PM

LT
TO
Coryell (overdue)
Jason Taylor
Dawkins
Andersen

jjchieffan 01-03-2017 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12659216)
Anyone that says Davis is a dumbass.

I really hate agreeing with you. But this time, you're right. Shanarats offense made average backs look better than they were. Davis was not a HOF back. It is an insult to every running back in the HOF not named Bettis that he is even a finalist.

BryanBusby 01-03-2017 10:44 PM

Davis didn't perform long enough at a high level to be a HoFer imo

jjchieffan 01-03-2017 10:46 PM

I voted Warner and Coryell right away, then struggled for the remainder. I went with Tomlinson, Dawkins, and Isaac Bruce to make it 5.

88TG88 01-03-2017 10:46 PM

I guess Eric Warfield just missed the cut

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 12659341)
LT
TO
Coryell (overdue)
Jason Taylor
Dawkins
Andersen

Warner is a consensus HOF and top of the class. Jason Taylor may have played longer and piled up good stats, but he was a stat padder.

carcosa 01-03-2017 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 12659364)
I voted Warner and Coryell right away, then struggled for the remainder. I went with Tomlinson, Dawkins, and Isaac Bruce to make it 5.

Tomlinson seems pretty obvious.

BryanBusby 01-03-2017 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12659368)
Warner is a consensus HOF and top of the class. Jason Taylor may have played longer and piled up good stats, but he was a stat padder.

He padded it enough to be be in the mix and I can't imagine an entire class with just one defensive player.

DaneMcCloud 01-03-2017 10:52 PM

If Davis can't get in, neither can Boselli.

IMO, Davis belongs.

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 12659373)
Tomlinson seems pretty obvious.

Being in a weak class, maybe so. I don't think it's obvious. He benefited from a ridiculously RB friendly era. Curtis Martin didn't get in on the first try. Roger Craig for some insane reason isn't in at all. These are guys who grinded in an era that was really tough for RBs and they won Super Bowls.

Rain Man 01-03-2017 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rick (Post 12659264)
Interesting take on LeRoy Butler not even getting a sniff compared to Lynch...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/GaryEllerson">@GaryEllerson</a> LeRoy Butler played 43 less games than Lynch but has 320 more tackles, 7 more sacks, 12 more INT&#39;s, &amp; 3 more FF. Why no LeRoy?</p>&mdash; James Moran (@Jiggs44) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jiggs44/status/816472672209174529">January 4, 2017</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Very interesting.

I hate to admit it, but there's a whole raft of NFC safeties that I can't distinguish between. I'm pretty sure they were all the same guy who kept getting traded and changing his name: Brian Dawkins, Leroy Butler, Darren Woodson, Eugene Robinson, and so on. I remember Lynch differently because he had a reputation as a hitter, but otherwise I'd probably throw him into that crowd, too.

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 12659376)
He padded it enough to be be in the mix and I can't imagine an entire class with just one defensive player.

I would take Law or Lynch over Taylor.

Both those guys made a clear mark on the league. And Law was an elite playoff defender. Taylor didn't leave any mark. If Chris Doleman and Kevin Greene took a million years to get in, Taylor shouldn't get in first year.

Rain Man 01-03-2017 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12659394)
Being in a weak class, maybe so. I don't think it's obvious. He benefited from a ridiculously RB friendly era. Curtis Martin didn't get in on the first try. Roger Craig for some insane reason isn't in at all. These are guys who grinded in an era that was really tough for RBs and they won Super Bowls.

Tomlinson is essentially Curtis Martin in my mind. Good running back? Certainly. Productive? Certainly? Was he electrifying or fun to watch? Not really.

DaneMcCloud 01-03-2017 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12659402)
I would take Law or Lynch over Taylor.

Both those guys made a clear mark on the league. And Law was an elite playoff defender. Taylor didn't leave any mark. If Chris Doleman and Kevin Greene took a million years to get in, Taylor shouldn't get in first year.

I'm not sure of there has ever been a more naturally gifted pass rusher than Jason Taylor. He was so tall and so lean and so graceful. He had super model looks and chicks galore.

The problem is that he didn't love the game.

Jason Taylor played the game because he could, not because it was his obsession.

If you could put James Harrison or Tamba Hali in Jason Taylor's frame, we'd be looking at 250 sacks.

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 12659401)
Very interesting.

I hate to admit it, but there's a whole raft of NFC safeties that I can't distinguish between. I'm pretty sure they were all the same guy who kept getting traded and changing his name: Brian Dawkins, Leroy Butler, Darren Woodson, Eugene Robinson, and so on. I remember Lynch differently because he had a reputation as a hitter, but otherwise I'd probably throw him into that crowd, too.

Butler not getting in is a snub. But I don't think that should stop Dawkins from getting in. Lynch may have been more memorable, but of that group Dawkins was by far the biggest difference maker. Jim Johnson's defense was flat out dominant and Dawkins was the lynchpin of that defense.

But I actually think Dawkins could get snubbed because Polamalu and Ed Reed are coming up and Safeties don't typically get much HOF respect. And of the 3, Dawkins is definitely the #3.

chiefzilla1501 01-03-2017 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12659416)
I'm not sure of there has ever been a more naturally gifted pass rusher than Jason Taylor. He was so tall and so lean and so graceful. He had super model looks and chicks galore.

The problem is that he didn't love the game.

Jason Taylor played the game because he could, not because it was his obsession.

That's my issue too. Ty Law wasn't the best CB of his time. But he was competitive as hell and elite in the postseason. If I'm a coach, I want more Ty Laws and less Jason Taylors. That standard should work for HOF too.

Hell, Ricky Watters has every right to be in HOF consideration. But he's rightfully blackballed because of comments he made about not laying out for catches.

KChiefs1 01-03-2017 11:28 PM

As long as Otis Taylor isn't in the HOF...its a flawed shrine which I don't care about.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BWillie 01-03-2017 11:33 PM

If TO doesn't get in, it's a travesty.

Pepe Silvia 01-03-2017 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 12659283)
Take out Boselli and put in Jacoby.

I'll have to take your word on Jacoby, I didn't start watching football until his last years with the Skins.

Rain Man 01-03-2017 11:55 PM

I've made this argument about Terrell Owens before, so I'm repeating myself. Was he a great player? Yes, certainly. His stats are phenomenal. But you have to offset that with the fact that he dragged down the performance of his team and his teammates with his constant divisive behavior.

Rain Man 01-03-2017 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PackerinMo (Post 12659444)
I'll have to take your word on Jacoby, I didn't start watching football until his last years with the Skins.

He definitely should be in.

Demonpenz 01-04-2017 02:07 AM

LT

listopencil 01-04-2017 02:31 AM

I picked Don Coryell, three guys who played for my team, and then randomly picked Bosselli.

listopencil 01-04-2017 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12659333)
Is it really a given?

Never won a Super Bowl. Was lousy in the playoffs. Only really coached offense. Do you make the HOF for being an innovator/outstanding coordinator on one side of the ball? Sure, he left an impact on the way offenses are run, but does his innovation overcome his lack of accomplishment, especially when he competes against head coaches who've won Super Bowls?


Coryell should already be in there.

WhawhaWhat 01-04-2017 06:46 AM

Brian Dawkins
LaDanian Tomlinson
Terrell Owens
Kevin Mawae

Dawkins was a beast in the middle of the field before they neutered defenses. Mawae was a great Center for a long time. Tomlinson and Owens are no brainers.

milkman 01-04-2017 07:04 AM

Don Coryell simply refined the downfield aspects of Sid Gillman's offense, and he never won anything.

Gillman is the only real offensive innovator of the last 60 years, and deserves HOF consideration before Coryell.

Garcia Bronco 01-04-2017 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PackerinMo (Post 12659444)
I'll have to take your word on Jacoby, I didn't start watching football until his last years with the Skins.

He was great. Its not that TB isn't a HOF, but Joe was one of the best and its long overdue.

BossChief 01-04-2017 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12659378)
If Davis can't get in, neither can Boselli.

IMO, Davis belongs.

If Davis belongs, so does Priest.

ThaVirus 01-04-2017 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 12659364)
I voted Warner and Coryell right away, then struggled for the remainder. I went with Tomlinson, Dawkins, and Isaac Bruce to make it 5.


Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12659394)
Being in a weak class, maybe so. I don't think it's obvious. He benefited from a ridiculously RB friendly era. Curtis Martin didn't get in on the first try. Roger Craig for some insane reason isn't in at all. These are guys who grinded in an era that was really tough for RBs and they won Super Bowls.


I find it hard to believe anyone wouldn't think LT was a shoe-in for first-ballot.

He's the most productive RB in NFL history, IMO. In 2003 he rushed for 1,600 yards AND caught 100 passes. In 2006, he scored 31 rushing & receiving TDs AND threw 3 TDs as well. He had over 1,200 rushing yards in each of his first seven seasons. He never contributed less than 350 receiving yards when he played an entire season.

The guy AVERAGED 15 TDs per season.

My God.

ThaVirus 01-04-2017 10:55 AM

Terrell Davis can get into the Postseason HoF but otherwise he's really just Hall of Very Good or Hall of Great But Just Not for Long Enough like Priest Holmes, Shaun Alexander, etc.

ThaVirus 01-04-2017 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12659708)
Don Coryell simply refined the downfield aspects of Sid Gillman's offense, and he never won anything.



Gillman is the only real offensive innovator of the last 60 years, and deserves HOF consideration before Coryell.


I'm glad you came in here because the guy was before my time and I really couldn't formulate an argument for myself.

If you're so inclined and you've got the time, care to share your top 5 coaches of all time?

ThaVirus 01-04-2017 10:59 AM

Does Warner have a strong case?

He threw a lot of TDs but also threw a lot of INTs. He doesn't even have a 2:1 TD:INT ratio. That kinda sucks.

He did take two different teams to the Super Bowl but they were like 10 years apart and he had some seriously bad years in the middle of his career.

Buck 01-04-2017 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 12659405)
Tomlinson is essentially Curtis Martin in my mind. Good running back? Certainly. Productive? Certainly? Was he electrifying or fun to watch? Not really.

You're out of your god damned mind.

LT was one of the flashiest backs ever. The moves he put on people were second only to Barry Sanders. Not to mention nobody had a better stiff-arm.

He could leap over the entire O-Line and D-Line from the 5 yard line.

He not only broke the TD record, but smashed it, it probably won't be broken for some time, if ever.

Rain Man 01-04-2017 11:06 AM

I've never figured out how Russ Grimm got in years ago, and Joe Jacoby isn't in. Grimm was a left guard playing alongside Jacoby, who was a left tackle, and Jacoby was a far better player at a more demanding position. They both went to four pro bowls and three Super Bowls, all in the same years. Jacoby had a longer career as well.

Aside from that Jacoby deserves to be in and Grimm simply doesn't. Grimm was perhaps slightly above average while Jacoby was dominant.

Rain Man 01-04-2017 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 12659961)
You're out of your god damned mind.

LT was one of the flashiest backs ever. The moves he put on people were second only to Barry Sanders. Not to mention nobody had a better stiff-arm.

He could leap over the entire O-Line and D-Line from the 5 yard line.

He not only broke the TD record, but smashed it, it probably won't be broken for some time, if ever.

I generally only saw him in Chiefs games, so maybe the dominant Chiefs simply shut him down every time.

But, wait. He played while Greg Robinson was the defensive coordinator for the Chiefs and they didn't shut anybody down.

This is a mystery.

ThaVirus 01-04-2017 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 12659961)
You're out of your god damned mind.



LT was one of the flashiest backs ever. The moves he put on people were second only to Barry Sanders. Not to mention nobody had a better stiff-arm.



He could leap over the entire O-Line and D-Line from the 5 yard line.



He not only broke the TD record, but smashed it, it probably won't be broken for some time, if ever.


He had the best stiff arm I've ever seen. Always put it right on the bottom of the defender's face mask. Beautiful.

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2017...46d2f47a88.jpg

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2017...21cd467c83.jpg

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2017...0baa143167.jpg

ThaVirus 01-04-2017 11:11 AM

He had incredible ball control as well. He hardly ever fumbled.

Legit, the only argument I think you can really make against him is a paltry 4.3 YPC average for his career. That's probably just above league average so it's not spectacular, but it was kind of bogged down by subpar later years. During his prime he was good for a solid 4.6-5.0 any given season.

Oh, and he really sucked in the postseason as well.

ChiTown 01-04-2017 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 12659738)
If Davis belongs, so does Priest.

:clap:

wazu 01-04-2017 11:22 AM

Owens is 3rd all time in receiving yards and TDs. If you don't think he belongs in HOF then I really can't discuss anybody else on the list with you.

Red Dawg 01-04-2017 11:25 AM

Davis should never ever even be a finalist. 6 years is nothing and in reality only 3 years of productivity. I understand he has two rings but so what? Numerous players do and still are not in and they played twice as long.

It's insulting to others that year after year took the punishment to be great. He didn't and is further proof it's a popularity contest and a farse.

carcosa 01-04-2017 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12660006)
Davis should never ever even be a finalist. 6 years is nothing. I understand he has two rings but so what? Numerous players do and still are not in and they played twice as long.

It's insulting to others that year after year took the punishment to be great. He didn't and is further proof it's a popularity contest and a farse.

It really is farsical.

Red Dawg 01-04-2017 11:30 AM

Davis only had 3 good years. That's it.

DJ's left nut 01-04-2017 11:36 AM

That does seem like a weak crop, doesn't it.

I've never understood the Boselli love. Sure, the guy was good....for 5 years. He has the same problem Davis does. That's just not enough for a HoF vote for me. You have to be damn good and damn durable. Boselli wasn't.

Owens is the same no brainer he's been since he hit the ballot.
Warner is the best pure thrower of my lifetime
LDT - He good.

Substantial gap to guys that I could probably ignore and not be too upset

Anderson...ugh, he's a kicker but damn was he a good one.
Old people say that Joe Jacoby was really good. He had a similar peak 4 year run to Boselli but was a productive player for several years after that.

Mile High Mania 01-04-2017 11:50 AM

I think Kurt Warner is such bad pick, but he'll get in at some point... six good years with two teams. Let him in, how do you keep the slew of guys out that will pour into consideration over the next decade?

Mile High Mania 01-04-2017 11:53 AM

And, regarding TD... I've stopped debating it. The injury unfortunately killed a great career (thanks Griese). If he had played another 3-4 seasons of average football, he'd be a no brainer by most accounts because of the 'body of work' and longevity. The longevity kills it, but there's no denying he was one amazing RB and consistent. Short window, but he accomplished a ton... more than most with 10 year careers.

ChiTown 01-04-2017 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12660024)
That does seem like a weak crop, doesn't it.

I've never understood the Boselli love. Sure, the guy was good....for 5 years. He has the same problem Davis does. That's just not enough for a HoF vote for me. You have to be damn good and damn durable. Boselli wasn't.

Owens is the same no brainer he's been since he hit the ballot.
Warner is the best pure thrower of my lifetime
LDT - He good.

Substantial gap to guys that I could probably ignore and not be too upset

Anderson...ugh, he's a kicker but damn was he a good one.
Old people say that Joe Jacoby was really good. He had a similar peak 4 year run to Boselli but was a productive player for several years after that.

I had Owens, Warner and LDT. After that, I was struggling to find two more, so I went with Kevin Mawae, who was a PHENOMENAL Center and Ty Law. As much as I like Ty Law, I would probably change that vote to Mort. Guy kicked forever, and holds a shit ton of records. He's absolutely deserving - even for a kicker

carcosa 01-04-2017 12:06 PM

There should be a HOF for great players whose careers were cut short by injury. The Hall of Lame!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.