ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs ****Official Chiefs clip the Eagles media dump thread**** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=310156)

Hammock Parties 09-17-2017 02:11 PM

****Official Chiefs clip the Eagles media dump thread****
 
May as well just do one of these every week, fam.


Easy 6 09-17-2017 03:19 PM

Sasquatch is such a beast

Gif up Sorensen doing his Superman impression

JoeyChuckles 09-17-2017 03:22 PM

Attendance in this thread is on par with the Chargers game.

Hammock Parties 09-17-2017 03:23 PM

https://i.imgur.com/bRq0E37.gif

Easy 6 09-17-2017 03:25 PM

That was so awesome, didnt get the sack but it definitely affected the throw

Hammock Parties 09-17-2017 03:51 PM

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJ82a5UUEAEw06C.jpg

TimBone 09-17-2017 04:08 PM

Can we get Smith's awesome throw to Conley up the right sideline?

Hammock Parties 09-17-2017 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ModBone (Post 13088063)
Can we get Smith's awesome throw to Conley up the right sideline?

here you go

https://i.imgur.com/vMsha.jpg

KChiefs1 09-17-2017 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13088005)



Sweet dreams

RINGLEADER 09-17-2017 04:48 PM

https://i.imgur.com/zGUiOtw.jpg

RINGLEADER 09-17-2017 04:51 PM

Not sure this is the best angle...

https://i.imgur.com/g4iF02H.jpg

eDave 09-17-2017 04:53 PM

NSFW language

<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rWA1ev4A3bI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

GayFrogs 09-17-2017 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 13088207)
NSFW language

<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rWA1ev4A3bI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I was looking forward to this dude's take. Nice screencap by the way ROFL

GayFrogs 09-17-2017 05:44 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/x45fEL3ITQA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

ROFL

Bowser 09-17-2017 05:51 PM

LMAO

TimBone 09-17-2017 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13088072)

Weak

Hammock Parties 09-17-2017 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ModBone (Post 13088400)
Weak

you can't see it?

looks good to me

St. Patty's Fire 09-17-2017 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13088419)
you can't see it?

looks good to me

Can't see it either

CupidStunt 09-17-2017 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 13088207)
NSFW language

<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rWA1ev4A3bI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

ROFLROFLROFLROFL

Strongside 09-17-2017 07:39 PM

That eagles fan is my spirit animal

R8RFAN 09-17-2017 07:40 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-video" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr">😳😳😳 <a href="https://t.co/dvFliB2AoQ">pic.twitter.com/dvFliB2AoQ</a></p>&mdash; Ashley (@ashwagner13) <a href="https://twitter.com/ashwagner13/status/909482446856605696">September 17, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

displacedinMN 09-17-2017 07:49 PM

Dude, how pathetic are you that you have to film yourself watching a game and swear all the time???? Is this a thing????

Kill me now

TigeRRUppeRRcut 09-17-2017 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ModBone (Post 13088063)
Can we get Smith's awesome throw to Conley up the right sideline?

That was a clutch pass 35 yard pass to get into the red zone and eventually getting Hunt that TD

GayFrogs 09-17-2017 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by displacedinMN (Post 13088782)
Dude, how pathetic are you that you have to film yourself watching a game and swear all the time???? Is this a thing????

Kill me now

Nothing pathetic about 218k subscribers.

displacedinMN 09-17-2017 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by idrapethat (Post 13088799)
Nothing pathetic about 218k subscribers.

Does it make him money?

thabear04 09-17-2017 09:11 PM

Didn't see the game was attending my best friend funeral but I saw the last 6 minutes glad the Chiefs won.

ThaVirus 09-17-2017 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thabear04 (Post 13089029)
Didn't see the game was attending my best friend funeral but I saw the last 6 minutes glad the Chiefs won.

Sorry about your friend, bud.

DaFace 09-18-2017 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by displacedinMN (Post 13088803)
Does it make him money?

Almost certainly, yes.

Marcellus 09-18-2017 08:44 AM

Can you gif up the Dee Ford one handed sack?

DJ's left nut 09-18-2017 08:44 AM

How do you defend that friggen shuttle pass, man?

That looks like Kelce's pulling across the formation on an option run. It freezes those LBers because they have to worry about the possibility of Smith/Hunt (or Hill on occasion) bouncing it out wide.

It's just a brutal short-yardage play. I don't know how you keep them from picking up 3-5 yards easily if its executed properly. And if things break right it's a 20 yarder.

Just a nasty little wrinkle that Reid has come up with. I don't recall seeing that last year; this year they've run it about 5 times and gotten good yardage and/or a 3rd down conversion each time.

And the instant a team starts to sell out to stop it, Smith keeps that ball or pitches it out wide for 15+.

It's a hell of a lot more effective than those speed bootlegs with a single guy out in the pattern that they ran 2-3 times yesterday, that's for sure.

displacedinMN 09-18-2017 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 13089463)
Almost certainly, yes.

that is sad

Frosty 09-18-2017 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13089484)
How do you defend that friggen shuttle pass, man?

The shovel pass is tough too.



:)

Quesadilla Joe 09-18-2017 09:38 AM

Some of Brian Baldinger's thoughts the Chiefs/Eagles game...

Spoiler!

DaFace 09-18-2017 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by displacedinMN (Post 13089529)
that is sad

He's not likely getting rich, but YouTube can be a nice, money-generating hobby if you are entertaining. According to this page, he's got almost 36 million views historically. It's not a straightforward calculation, but YouTube pays out somewhere in the vicinity of $2.50 per thousand views, so in theory he could have made around $90k through YouTube (though the actual payout varies widely).

Of course, that's over 1738 videos, so that's only like $50/video. Not a ton, but not chump change either.

O.city 09-18-2017 11:40 AM

Just saw the video of the Mitchell **** up.

Good lord man. What the hell was that?

saphojunkie 09-19-2017 12:09 PM

Need a gif of that kick ass run by Hunt down the right sideline.

InChiefsHeaven 09-19-2017 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13089585)
Some of Brian Baldinger's thoughts the Chiefs/Eagles game...

[SPOILER]<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/stonecoldjones_">@stonecoldjones_</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs">@chiefs</a> can be a dominant force. His technique here is must watch trench warfare. Only in <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/baldybreakdowns?src=hash">#baldybreakdowns</a> <a href="https://t.co/BbgoB8tHHD">pic.twitter.com/BbgoB8tHHD</a></p>&mdash; Brian Baldinger (@BaldyNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/BaldyNFL/status/909783643861798912">September 18, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Holy crap, that first one with Chris Jones throwing the guard around like a rag doll...I don't think I've ever seen that kind of dominance before...

RunKC 09-19-2017 12:39 PM

https://mobile.twitter.com/fduffy3/s...98211121467392

Alex is responsible for this sack. Had Albert Wilson open for at least a 5 yard gain. Hill was right behind the LB in the middle, but don't think Alex saw him.

Direckshun 09-19-2017 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 13087920)
That was so awesome, didnt get the sack but it definitely affected the throw

Wentz was 2/10 for 10 yards when under pressure.

Direckshun 09-19-2017 12:47 PM

Give me the Ford sack, Clay. I must see it again. :D

Thank you for the great work.

DJ's left nut 09-19-2017 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13091762)
https://mobile.twitter.com/fduffy3/s...98211121467392

Alex is responsible for this sack. Had Albert Wilson open for at least a 5 yard gain. Hill was right behind the LB in the middle, but don't think Alex saw him.

Looks like he was trying to look off the LBs to get the space to hit Hill.

Not sure what the down/distance was there, but he looked like he never had any interest in taking the dump. His eyes flicker down to Wilson but he's clearly hoping that space clears to hit Hill and it just didn't happen. He clearly expected Graham to crash on Wilson when he looked down and when he looks up to locate Hill, he sees that Graham didn't bite so he had nowhere to go.

That's another 'the other guy gets paid to beat you' moments. Tip your cap to the LBs for not biting on the underneath hard enough to allow Smith to do what he wanted to do there.

You can't get pissed at Alex for throwing too many checkdowns and then criticize him there - he's trying to do exactly what people ask for there and use his eyes/progressions to open up a bigger play. It just didn't come together.

Hammock Parties 09-19-2017 01:03 PM

Ok, here's the deep ball.

https://i.imgur.com/oCFKkdI.gif

Looks like a clear overthrow from Smith, and he should have led him more to the middle of the field. He made that catch very, very difficult. I don't see Reek slowing up.

I'll give credit to Smith for not taking a very easy checkdown, though.

DaFace 09-19-2017 01:08 PM

Even then, that's a tough throw, and Reek misjudged it a bit. If he'd run a tiny bit flatter of a route, he might have gotten there.

Regardless, that's a tough throw and catch, and you have to take shots here and there.

DJ's left nut 09-19-2017 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 13091815)
Even then, that's a tough throw, and Reek misjudged it a bit. If he'd run a tiny bit flatter of a route, he might have gotten there.

Regardless, that's a tough throw and catch, and you have to take shots here and there.

From the 'Andy SB' thread...

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13091588)
The back end zone view is a good one - I don't think it's a miss as much as it is just a 'shit happens' moment on a throw. Hill drifted inside on the route (you can see him angling in) and Smith puts it right over where his inside shoulder would be on a true vertical.

Look at where Hill's standing when Smith releases - right at in the middle of the 20 (top to bottom). He has inside position on the DB and a major speed advantage so I think Smith just put it straight out there. I think he expected Hill to flatten out at the top of the yard number. Look where it lands - virtually dead in line with where Hill was when Smith started to release and Hill got position.

If Hill isn't drifting towards the goal-post on his route, it's an easy six. But you can also see why Hill might have done that once he put the WR on his outside shoulder - buys him a little more room. Instead it added another stride to his route (explains the overthrow; the stride came after the ball was released) and why he had to make an adjustment. Hill also drifted - push play from the 21 second mark and watch Hill - there was no reason at all for his route to continue to slide towards the middle there - the CB is done. I understand why you'd take it a little deeper early in the route but by then it really does look like he doesn't realize he's angling in. That's that 'losing where he was on the field' feeling I got.

I have a hard time chalking that up to much more than 'deep passes are hard, man'. I can see why Smith would've wanted to put it a little more towards the middle - that's where the space was. But he also knows that Hill has a clean release and insane speed - there was really no cause to do so and the nearer he puts it towards the safety over the middle, the more likely he gets his guy hit. Didn't matter here, but as an operating principal you don't go towards the middle of the field if you don't have to.

Give them the tape of that play, have them discuss it and when all is said and done they'll hit that next time. That looks a whole lot like a WR and QB that just haven't quite figured each other out yet.

Thanks for the clips.


Hammock Parties 09-19-2017 01:14 PM

That's not a "true vertical," though. It's not a straight 9 route.

He puts two moves on the corner (you can't see the first one because I cut it out). He's *supposed* to break it inside.

Smith missed him.

Hammock Parties 09-19-2017 01:17 PM

Like, you can say what you want, but we've got maybe the greatest deep threat in the NFL on our team, who also happens to be an incredibly instinctive route runner.

And we've got one of the NFL's worst downfield passers during the last decade, who only hit two of those passes to Tyreek Hill last season.

I think I know where I'm assigning the blame.

DJ's left nut 09-19-2017 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13091830)
That's not a "true vertical," though. It's not a straight 9 route.

He puts two moves on the corner (you can't see the first one because I cut it out). He's *supposed* to break it inside.

Smith missed him.

You can't make that statement at ALL.

No, it wasn't a 9, but it was a double move and a go. Why is there any reason to believe that he's supposed to run a 'meandering middle' route there? If he ran a true post, maybe I'd buy it. But 'eh, just kinda slide a little to your right as you run' isn't any kind of pass pattern I've ever seen. You don't just drift in a planned route and that's what Hill did there.

If he's supposed to break it inside, he'd have a harder break than that.

You have to run at defined angles on timing/deep pass routes. A 7 degree break from center isn't any sort of defined angle. He just drifted - you're never taught that.

DJ's left nut 09-19-2017 01:22 PM

And he does slow up a bit shortly after the 20. Remember that Hill is a 'foot fire' player in how he generates his speed, yet there his stride slows down. He doesn't gain/maintain acceleration the same way Conley does - those big long strides yet that's what he does a little there; his stride slows into almost a distance lope. Look at about the 18, right after he gets inside - that's not full tilt Hill at all. And around the 9 he picks it back up again but too late to save it.

They just weren't on the same page there. It happens.

DJ's left nut 09-19-2017 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13091838)
Like, you can say what you want, but we've got maybe the greatest deep threat in the NFL on our team, who also happens to be an incredibly instinctive route runner.

And we've got one of the NFL's worst downfield passers during the last decade, who only hit two of those passes to Tyreek Hill last season.

I think I know where I'm assigning the blame.

So you won't critically examine the play but rather just go with your usual ad hominems. Got it.

There are clear, simple football explanations as to why your vision of this play doesn't check out. You're welcome to ignore them if you'd like.

O.city 09-19-2017 01:30 PM

It does look like he slowed a step about the 20 but I think that may be the stream?

Hammock Parties 09-19-2017 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13091853)
So you won't critically examine the play but rather just go with your usual ad hominems. Got it.

There are clear, simple football explanations as to why your vision of this play doesn't check out. You're welcome to ignore them if you'd like.

Naw, man. C'mon.

The route is going to the inside, and Smith leads him up the field.

He just missed it. Which...is what he does.

Hammock Parties 09-19-2017 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13091841)
If he ran a true post, maybe I'd buy it.

It's a skinny post.

O.city 09-19-2017 01:59 PM

If it's any kind of post, it was a bad route I'd think. I'm not really sure what it was

DJ's left nut 09-19-2017 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13091879)
It's a skinny post.

Then it's a shitty skinny post. He never made a cut, he just slowly drifted. A skinny post and he'd have hammered off that left foot to create even more space there - he didn't. He rolled the hell out of it and simply never flattened out.

It looks a hell of a lot more like he just didn't run a precise route, figured it out around the 20 and couldn't get himself back on track, hence his slowing up around the 18.

Whatever it is, it's not done well. And to believe it was a skinny post you'd have to say that Smith didn't just miss by the 2 feet that the 'overthrow' appears to be, but rather by probably 5 yards or so.

Nah, I can either go with "Hill's route was imprecise so the throw missed by 2-3 feet" or "Hill ran a bad skinny post and the throw missed by 4-5 yards".

The former is far more likely.

JakeF 09-19-2017 02:15 PM

The more i watch the Chiefs vs Eagles game the more i see that Alex Smith got pounded all game.

penguinz 09-19-2017 02:31 PM

If Hill doesn't turn his head to watch for the ball at 20 yards out his run stays straight and he is in the right spot to catch the ball. At the 20 he turns his head to watch and starts drifting inside.

DaFace 09-19-2017 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 13091706)
Need a gif of that kick ass run by Hunt down the right sideline.

Found it in a rookie highlight video. Here ya go.

<iframe src='https://gfycat.com/ifr/LiveMammothCoelacanth' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' allowfullscreen width='640' height='360'></iframe>

penbrook 09-19-2017 04:50 PM

I have a hard time believing that Smith overthrew Hill

Simply Red 09-19-2017 05:33 PM

Just thinking and this is off-topic a little - but man - that Hunt draft pick was so incredibly done. Very good job by them. I knew he'd be something special.

Dartgod 09-19-2017 06:24 PM

Looks like the safety (23) grabbed his hammy about the time it looked like Hill was going to haul that in for a TD.

I'm not an Alexual by any means, but I'm not a hater either. It just kills me the lengths that some go to discredit him. Look there is plenty of evidence from over the years that Alex is not an elite QB. This clip is not one of them.

threebag 09-19-2017 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 13091930)
The more i watch the Chiefs vs Eagles game the more i see that Alex Smith got pounded all game.

"He had four seconds, he sucks"/:o)'s

Easy 6 09-19-2017 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 13092198)
Found it in a rookie highlight video. Here ya go.

<iframe src='https://gfycat.com/ifr/LiveMammothCoelacanth' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' allowfullscreen width='640' height='360'></iframe>

Good Lord, my stream must've been glitching during that little doozy

Whether it was Dorsey, Veach, or a combination of the two... we can only hope that same eagle eye for talent remains

So many young badasses have been collected in 4 short years

milkman 09-20-2017 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 13092383)
"He had four seconds, he sucks"/:o)'s

That is an idiot post.

The pass protection was fine, but Alex Smith is clearly looking to push the ball downfield more, which leads to him holding the ball longer.

The OL did it's pretty job well against a damn good defensive front, and Alex Smith did a great job of standing in the pocket, looking for plays, and making plays.

threebag 09-20-2017 03:52 AM

Go read some of Clownus's drivel

YayMike 09-20-2017 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 13092791)
That is an idiot post.

The pass protection was fine, but Alex Smith is clearly looking to push the ball downfield more, which leads to him holding the ball longer.

The OL did it's pretty job well against a damn good defensive front, and Alex Smith did a great job of standing in the pocket, looking for plays, and making plays.

This is 100% true. After rewatching the game, his eyes are downfield a hell of a lot more often than I've ever seen. With the exception of a few plays, he is going through his progressions and the first read, sometimes the second are downfield. I am okay with a few more sacks based on this.

Hammock Parties 09-20-2017 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 13092791)
That is an idiot post.

The pass protection was fine, but Alex Smith is clearly looking to push the ball downfield more, which leads to him holding the ball longer.


But on that play the deepest receiver was only 10 yards.

He still has a lot of bad habits when a receiver doesn't come immediately open.

DJ's left nut 09-20-2017 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13092827)
But on that play the deepest receiver was only 10 yards.

He still has a lot of bad habits when a receiver doesn't come immediately open.

Seriously - what the **** are you talking about?

His receiver didn't come immediately open. Had he dumped it to Wilson, you'd have bitched about him being the same ol' Admiral Checkdown we've had.

He did the only thing he could've done there to try to push the ball. And he doesn't control the damn routes - that was the call. He was looking to get the ball deeper down the field there and took a sack because of it.

That's EXACTLY what you're asking for and that's exactly the outcome that's going to occur on occasion because of it.

You're just mostly reeruned. You do know that, right? I mean damn man, you act like he should just be taking 7 step drops and throwing it as hard as he can every other snap. That play is a play that a good, aggressive QB tries to make because often times that LB will bit and you'll get a guy free in the second level to make a catch and turn upfield for 12-15 yards. That's an easy pitch and catch if the LB just follows the QBs eyes.

And yet you still bitch. Because that's what you do.

Hammock Parties 09-20-2017 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13092938)
His receiver didn't come immediately open.

Exactly. Hence the result of that play.

And there were no "deeper" routes on that play. The deepest man was 10 yards.

Just a dude shitting his pants in the pocket because his primary read wasn't open.

threebag 09-20-2017 08:39 AM

:facepalm: the :o)

DJ's left nut 09-20-2017 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13092940)
Exactly. Hence the result of that play.

No, the linebacker made a good play, 'hence the result'.

The other guys get paid to play as well, champ. Nobody's ever completed 100% of their passes. There was no 'bad habit' there, he tried to move the LB with his eyes and it didn't work. Shit happens.

A bad habit would've been throwing the damn thing anyway. Instead he saw that the jig was up, looked for a running lane up the middle (there really wasn't one) so he tucked the ball and mitigated the damages.

Sometimes you just tip your cap to the other guy. It doesn't mean Smith screwed up.

RunKC 09-20-2017 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13092938)
Seriously - what the **** are you talking about?

His receiver didn't come immediately open. Had he dumped it to Wilson, you'd have bitched about him being the same ol' Admiral Checkdown we've had.

He did the only thing he could've done there to try to push the ball. And he doesn't control the damn routes - that was the call. He was looking to get the ball deeper down the field there and took a sack because of it.

That's EXACTLY what you're asking for and that's exactly the outcome that's going to occur on occasion because of it.

You're just mostly reeruned. You do know that, right? I mean damn man, you act like he should just be taking 7 step drops and throwing it as hard as he can every other snap. That play is a play that a good, aggressive QB tries to make because often times that LB will bit and you'll get a guy free in the second level to make a catch and turn upfield for 12-15 yards. That's an easy pitch and catch if the LB just follows the QBs eyes.

And yet you still bitch. Because that's what you do.

It's sad really. Clay is not objective on this subject and his opinion of being wrong on 90+% football related discussion just further proves his case.

He's just trying to push that agenda non matter what and is trying hard to get in a "win/win" situation fitting that agenda.

It's probably best for nobody to talk to Clay anymore.

DJ's left nut 09-20-2017 08:42 AM

Lord, you actually edited it to make it less intelligent.

What would you have had him do, Mr. Wizard? That was absolutely the right decision and the occasional result of a QB looking to make a play rather than take the first 3 yard dump available to him.

You're just all over the damn map. It's pretty solid evidence that you truly have no idea what you're looking at.

As though we needed any more of it.

Hammock Parties 09-20-2017 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13092946)
No, the linebacker made a good play, 'hence the result'.

The other guys get paid to play as well, champ. Nobody's ever completed 100% of their passes. There was no 'bad habit' there, he tried to move the LB with his eyes and it didn't work. Shit happens.

A bad habit would've been throwing the damn thing anyway. Instead he saw that the jig was up, looked for a running lane up the middle (there really wasn't one) so he tucked the ball and mitigated the damages.

Sometimes you just tip your cap to the other guy. It doesn't mean Smith screwed up.

Tucked the ball? LMAO

He exposed himself for a sack when the ball should have come out much, much sooner. But his tunnel vision killed the whole ****ing thing. Why act surprised and try to defend it? It's why he's been bad on third down his WHOLE ****ING CAREER.

You are drifting back into being a Smith homer after an offseason of waking up. It's really sad.

Hammock Parties 09-20-2017 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13092951)
What would you have had him do, Mr. Wizard?

Already explained this.

Dump it to Wilson or try to make a throw on the boundary to Conley.

Anything is better than just standing there doing the pants shitting routine before taking a sack.

Might as well have been Matthew Brennan Cassel back there.

O.city 09-20-2017 08:46 AM

If you're not gonna throw the out to Conley in the break, yo can't throw it. That's a pick 6 waiting to happen.

O.city 09-20-2017 08:47 AM

Late throws outside the number aren't really a great idea

DJ's left nut 09-20-2017 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13092952)
Tucked the ball? LMAO

He exposed himself for a sack when the ball should have come out much, much sooner. But his tunnel vision killed the whole ****ing thing. Why act surprised and try to defend it? It's why he's been bad on third down his WHOLE ****ING CAREER.

You are drifting back into being a Smith homer after an offseason of waking up. It's really sad.

Tunnel vision? Oh for ****'s sake. He saw the open guy underneath and DIDN'T take it. He actually tried to use that open man to draw coverage over.

There was nothing 'tunnel vision' about that play. He had the right idea and the LB sniffed it out. I ask again - what was the right play there? What should he have done on a play where the whole design was to draw the LB down on the crosser to free up the middle?

And you're just buried into the same old mindless weather-vane who waits for popular opinion to emerge so you can latch onto it like grim death and then manipulate GIFs to make a point that others made far better before you. Tell me more about the greatness of Trent Green after you spent a solid year pining for Damon Huard to replace him. You just don't have the foggiest ****ing idea what you're talking about.

Somehow after 100,000 posts and countless hours spent following this sport, you still lack a fundamental understanding of what is actually happening on the field. You really are like someone's middle-aged mom who has the game on in the background and then gets really excited when the fans cheer or really mad when we have to punt but has no idea why either of those things occurred.

DJ's left nut 09-20-2017 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13092955)
Already explained this.

Dump it to Wilson or try to make a throw on the boundary to Conley.

Anything is better than just standing there doing the pants shitting routine before taking a sack.

Might as well have been Matthew Brennan Cassel back there.

Then you're just reeruned.

You don't throw late and at the hashes - ever. At best you get Wilson absolutely murdered. And if you throw it to Conley at the boundary it's probably getting housed.

You want bad habits? You just named two of them - throwing an out route after the break or throwing late between the numbers are two absolutely abysmal habits and something that no QB ever will be taught to do (Mahomes won't see the field if that's something he does with regularity).

You're just spewing tripe with no basis in reality.

DJ's left nut 09-20-2017 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13092958)
If you're not gonna throw the out to Conley in the break, yo can't throw it. That's a pick 6 waiting to happen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13092959)
Late throws outside the number aren't really a great idea

Ya don't say...

O.city's an evil dentist who gets drunk and goes and hangs out in closed bars during baseball games and even he gets it.

Hammock Parties 09-20-2017 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13092960)
Tunnel vision? Oh for ****'s sake. He saw the open guy underneath and DIDN'T take it. He actually tried to use that open man to draw coverage over.

There was nothing 'tunnel vision' about that play.

Yes there is. He's just staring down Hill and desperately hoping a throwing lane opens up.

Complete and total tunnel vision.

The Chiefs ran the same play in New England for a first down to Reek (on the TD drive before the half) and Smith did the same thing, but it worked because the OL provided him with an ABSURD amount of time instead of just an adequate amount.

What, did you guys actually think Smith was good on third down, suddenly? That's never been true...because he does shit like this.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.