ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Trade Deadline (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=345760)

O.city 10-26-2022 08:47 AM

Trade Deadline
 
With their now being that extra WC spot and everyone being bunched up, there's gonna be alot of executives deluding themselves into thinking they have a shot.

Even with that said, I've never understood why more teams don't sell. Take the Raiders for instance and Josh Jacobs. He's clearly going elsewhere this offseason, so they probably think they could get a 3rd round comp pick. If the Saints beat them this weekend, why wouldn't you try to move him?

The Saints should trade anything that's not bolted down at this point, but I digress.

I know teams don't like to shit on their fanbase and sell because of tickets and blah blah blah.

Why dont' more teams sell though?

The Franchise 10-26-2022 08:49 AM

Just depends on how far into the contract the coach or GM is. If you're at the end....you aren't trying to tear everything down. You're trying to save your job.

O.city 10-26-2022 08:50 AM

I hadn't thought thru that much, but you're right. You'd need some assurances from the owner first.

Chris Meck 10-26-2022 08:57 AM

deluding.

O.city 10-26-2022 08:59 AM

Ah yes, thanks.

DJ's left nut 10-26-2022 09:01 AM

To some extent it's a lack of teams looking to buy, IMO.

But I agree that there should be more trades at certain positions. I would think DL and RB should be positions that can hit the ground running pretty quickly.

wazu 10-26-2022 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16555196)
Just depends on how far into the contract the coach or GM is. If you're at the end....you aren't trying to tear everything down. You're trying to save your job.

This is the unfortunate cycle for many teams. People within the organization have different priorities. Very few GMs/coaches have the job security to truly sign on for a rebuild. So they just paste together some team that can finish above .500 and save their job(s) for another year.

A few years ago the Browns GM went all-in on tank mode, accumulated a ton of picks, and they rebuilt that team with a ton of young talent. It was obvious that it was a plan that was agreed upon by ownership. But then they fired the GM anyway, shortly before the team took a gigantic leap forward.

Direckshun 10-26-2022 09:07 AM

You have to have to believe the owner (or other executive above you) will give you the time you need to rebuild and develop.

I simply don't think most franchises have that.

What teams out there can you say are (a.) hopeless, and (b.) have a person in charge who will patiently allow the coach/GM to trade off parts of the house in order to build and develop a new one?

Patriots with Belichick
Steelers with Tomlin
Jags with Peterson
maaaaaaybe Dennis Allen with the Saints, maybe.

End of list.

O.city 10-26-2022 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16555232)
To some extent it's a lack of teams looking to buy, IMO.

But I agree that there should be more trades at certain positions. I would think DL and RB should be positions that can hit the ground running pretty quickly.

I get not trading for a Qb.

But outside that, I'd think you should be able to ease a guy in.

The Franchise 10-26-2022 09:09 AM

Plus I don't know of a ton of owners out there that are going to be okay with admitting that they're in a fire sale or rebuild year. Their goal is to keep as much talent as possible until they can find those one or two pieces to push them over the top.

O.city 10-26-2022 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 16555243)
You have to have to believe the owner (or other executive above you) will give you the time you need to rebuild and develop.

I simply don't think most franchises have that.

What teams out there can you say are (a.) hopeless, and (b.) have a person in charge who will patiently allow the coach/GM to trade off parts of the house in order to build and develop a new one?

Patriots with Belichick
Steelers with Tomlin
Jags with Peterson
maaaaaaybe Dennis Allen with the Saints, maybe.

End of list.

This is probably true, but even still is crazy. Owners who are usually very intelligent wealthy people, just look short sighted when doing it this way.

Look at the Broncos. There's no reason they shouldn't atleast trade Chubb. He's not re signing there and they need picks to recoup the Wilson trade.

lcarus 10-26-2022 09:18 AM

Reports now are saying the Browns want a 4th round pick for Kareem Hunt.

htismaqe 10-26-2022 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 16555266)
Reports now are saying the Browns want a 4th round pick for Kareem Hunt.

His cap hit is pretty low too. I would imagine he's going to get traded given those numbers.

wazu 10-26-2022 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 16555243)
You have to have to believe the owner (or other executive above you) will give you the time you need to rebuild and develop.

I simply don't think most franchises have that.

What teams out there can you say are (a.) hopeless, and (b.) have a person in charge who will patiently allow the coach/GM to trade off parts of the house in order to build and develop a new one?

Patriots with Belichick
Steelers with Tomlin
Jags with Peterson
maaaaaaybe Dennis Allen with the Saints, maybe.

End of list.

Should the Colts be added to the list? Could be wrong, but seems like Ballard and even Reich have a pretty long leash. Reich benching Matt Ryan forever after this last weekend's game indicates a guy that makes decisions that aren't based on fear.

lcarus 10-26-2022 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16555268)
His cap hit is pretty low too. I would imagine he's going to get traded given those numbers.

I would love it if we gave up a 4th to get him back. It would increase our chances of winning the Super Bowl enough to justify it without question.

I don't see it happening though given the history. Clark Hunt stated he would never play for the Kansas City Chiefs again so I can't see him going back on that. He could change his mind after so many years but it's not likely.

O.city 10-26-2022 09:26 AM

Kareem Hunt will never play for teh Chiefs. We should all move on.

ptlyon 10-26-2022 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 16555276)
I would love it if we gave up a 4th to get him back. It would increase our chances of winning the Super Bowl enough to justify it without question.

I don't see it happening though given the history. Clark Hunt stated he would never play for the Kansas City Chiefs again so I can't see him going back on that. He could change his mind after so many years but it's not likely.

And neither will Lamar

The Franchise 10-26-2022 09:27 AM

**** Kareem Hunt.

RedinTexas 10-26-2022 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 16555270)
Should the Colts be added to the list? Could be wrong, but seems like Ballard and even Reich have a pretty long leash. Reich benching Matt Ryan forever after this last weekend's game indicates a guy that makes decisions that aren't based on fear.

Either that or an act of desperation.

dirk digler 10-26-2022 09:32 AM

Think the Saints would consider trading Cam Jordan?

htismaqe 10-26-2022 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 16555300)
Think the Saints would consider trading Cam Jordan?

A lot of speculation out there that they will trade him. Not sure what kind of draft picks you'd have to give up but his cap hit is like $13M, which not many people are going to want.

The Franchise 10-26-2022 09:34 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“Cooks has been the subject of multiple trade inquiries, including the Green Bay Packers, Kansas City Chiefs and the Rams” <a href="https://t.co/GsHalaMW9o">https://t.co/GsHalaMW9o</a></p>&mdash; Nick Jacobs (@Jacobs71) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jacobs71/status/1585291844233084929?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 26, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Mecca 10-26-2022 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 16555300)
Think the Saints would consider trading Cam Jordan?

They've already paid him most of his money so probably only if they got something good.

Guys like Kamara and Lattimore are who they should be moving.

htismaqe 10-26-2022 09:39 AM

So we're in on Cooks?

Hopefully, we've called about Hughes too.

O.city 10-26-2022 09:41 AM

So, (I'm sure this will be taken well and discussed and I won't get yelled at) if they're calling on COoks, what's that say about Moore?

Red Dawg 10-26-2022 09:42 AM

We gave no need for skill players
We need defense or OL.

htismaqe 10-26-2022 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16555322)
We gave no need for skill players
We need defense or OL.

It's not either/or. They should be looking to add anywhere and everywhere they can.

The Franchise 10-26-2022 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16555324)
It's not either/or. They should be looking to add anywhere and everywhere they can.

I don't know how many times this needs to be said.

Third Eye 10-26-2022 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16555321)
So, (I'm sure this will be taken well and discussed and I won't get yelled at) if they're calling on COoks, what's that say about Moore?

That he’s probably too expensive in terms of draft capital.

Mecca 10-26-2022 09:44 AM

I think the interest in Cooks puts back on the table what they wanted to begin with, JuJu with Tyreek. Cooks skillset gives you something similar again.

htismaqe 10-26-2022 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Third Eye (Post 16555328)
That he’s probably too expensive in terms of draft capital.

He was talking about Skyy not DJ, I believe.

O.city 10-26-2022 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16555324)
It's not either/or. They should be looking to add anywhere and everywhere they can.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16555326)
I don't know how many times this needs to be said.

Yeah, you can only add what's available.

Discuss Thrower 10-26-2022 09:48 AM

If the Browns publicize they will cough up Kareem for a 4th then you'd better be blowing up their phones.

The Franchise 10-26-2022 09:48 AM

Adding Cooks just gives this offense another capable weapon to win one on one matchups.

htismaqe 10-26-2022 09:48 AM

The one other thing - Cooks is under contract through next season. The WR room gets a lot less crowded next year with only MVS and Moore having contracts. The issue is that Cooks' contract is pretty massive.

The Franchise 10-26-2022 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16555343)
The one other thing - Cooks is under contract through next season. The WR room gets a lot less crowded next year with only MVS and Moore having contracts. The issue is that Cooks' contract is pretty massive.

They could also take the opportunity to convert some of his non-guaranteed salary into a signing bonus. His cap hits aren't horrible.

2023 - $18 million
2024 - $13 million

notorious 10-26-2022 09:51 AM

Cooks demands too much cap.

Unless we are trading a cap heavy guy for him it won't work.

Move on.

Marcellus 10-26-2022 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16555288)
Kareem Hunt will never play for teh Chiefs. We should all move on.

I'm somewhat shocked you aren't advocating trading our 1st rounder for him.

Who do you have us giving up that pick for?



:D

kccrow 10-26-2022 09:52 AM

Most teams are not in an excellent cap position during the season to make blockbuster trades and absorb the hits. Sometimes you get the right contract and price together and a team takes it on. CMC had a relatively modest impact this year. DJ Moore does too. There are several more, but the guys that might yet hit a team for 15+ million aren't going anywhere and if they are then it's likely not to a contender. At that point, it's two teams shuffling the deck trying to align for next year.

htismaqe 10-26-2022 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16555345)
They could also take the opportunity to convert some of his non-guaranteed salary into a signing bonus. His cap hits aren't horrible.

2023 - $18 million
2024 - $13 million

They aren't horrible but they're probably still too steep for the Chiefs.

ptlyon 10-26-2022 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16555321)
So, (I'm sure this will be taken well and discussed and I won't get yelled at) if they're calling on COoks, what's that say about Moore?

:cuss:

DJ's left nut 10-26-2022 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16555321)
So, (I'm sure this will be taken well and discussed and I won't get yelled at) if they're calling on COoks, what's that say about Moore?

The interesting thing about Cooks is that you really could be looking at a bit of a one-stop shop.

Cooks, Hughes and Green are all guys who could help quite a bit. And between the 3 of them I think you're looking at maybe $2.8 million in total cap obligations.

The Texans may be more inclined to part them individually and see if that gets them a better return, but as a group they could maybe get as much as a 2nd for them. I think I'd give up a 3 and another 3 the following year.

The Franchise 10-26-2022 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16555367)
The interesting thing about Cooks is that you really could be looking at a bit of a one-stop shop.

Cooks, Hughes and Green are all guys who could help quite a bit. And between the 3 of them I think you're looking at maybe $2.8 million in total cap obligations.

The Texans may be more inclined to part them individually and see if that gets them a better return, but as a group they could maybe get as much as a 2nd for them. I think I'd give up a 3 and another 3 the following year.

Damn straight. Hughes and Green would help this defensive end group a ton. Not sure you can take on both though.

RunKC 10-26-2022 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16555343)
The one other thing - Cooks is under contract through next season. The WR room gets a lot less crowded next year with only MVS and Moore having contracts. The issue is that Cooks' contract is pretty massive.

I cannot get behind this bc Juju is significantly more valuable than Cooks. This offense declined when they lost Sammy Watkins. The offense as a whole thrives on precision and YAC.

Not having a guy like Juju breaking tackles and having that speed to get open really hurt us.

Cooks is 29 and Juju is only 25. Give that money to Juju going forward

raybec 4 10-26-2022 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16555367)
The interesting thing about Cooks is that you really could be looking at a bit of a one-stop shop.

Cooks, Hughes and Green are all guys who could help quite a bit. And between the 3 of them I think you're looking at maybe $2.8 million in total cap obligations.

The Texans may be more inclined to part them individually and see if that gets them a better return, but as a group they could maybe get as much as a 2nd for them. I think I'd give up a 3 and another 3 the following year.

In a heartbeat. That would address several weaknesses in one swoop.


And the ridiculous idea that we shouldn't improve in any area possible with the players available to us because we have greater need elsewhere is one of the dumbest, most short sighted, dim witted ideas I've seen on CP.

htismaqe 10-26-2022 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16555376)
I cannot get behind this bc Juju is significantly more valuable than Cooks. This offense declined when they lost Sammy Watkins. The offense as a whole thrives on precision and YAC.

Not having a guy like Juju breaking tackles and having that speed to get open really hurt us.

Cooks is 29 and Juju is only 25. Give that money to Juju going forward

I don't disagree but we have no idea what the Chiefs are thinking. Obviously, they're interested in Cooks but we really don't know why yet.

scho63 10-26-2022 10:12 AM

There should be a lot of trades since so many stars just got injured last 2 weeks and certain teams are in the shitter.

I don't expect anything from the Chiefs but you never know with our boy Brent Leach

htismaqe 10-26-2022 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 16555379)
In a heartbeat. That would address several weaknesses in one swoop.


And the ridiculous idea that we shouldn't improve in any area possible with the players available to us because we have greater need elsewhere is one of the dumbest, most short sighted, dim witted ideas I've seen on CP.

You should see social media.

"But we need defense! WHY?!?!"

EDIT: Even worse, most of them think we need to trade for a CB. They've completely forgotten we just spent a 1st round pick on one.

raybec 4 10-26-2022 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16555384)
You should see social media.

"But we need defense! WHY?!?!"

EDIT: Even worse, most of them think we need to trade for a CB. They've completely forgotten we just spent a 1st round pick on one.

It's like people think Veach is saying "I am going to trade for Cooks INSTEAD of a pass rusher or a tackle". They just don't grasp the idea that not every position group is available at all times.

Third Eye 10-26-2022 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16555331)
He was talking about Skyy not DJ, I believe.

Haha, oops!

TambaBerry 10-26-2022 10:21 AM

Why can't we take on cooks? If Juju plays like he is the rest of the season we can't afford him anyways. Getting a guy like Cooks would be awesome for this offense and its a friendly contract for the next two years.

htismaqe 10-26-2022 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 16555401)
It's like people think Veach is saying "I am going to trade for Cooks INSTEAD of a pass rusher or a tackle". They just don't grasp the idea that not every position group is available at all times.

Yep.

The Franchise 10-26-2022 10:24 AM

What makes people think that trading for Cooks would eliminate the possibility of bringing back Juju? If anything....they could get rid of MVS and keep both Cooks AND Juju.

htismaqe 10-26-2022 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16555415)
What makes people think that trading for Cooks would eliminate the possibility of bringing back Juju? If anything....they could get rid of MVS and keep both Cooks AND Juju.

They could keep all 3 in the event that Hardman becomes too expensive to keep.

O.city 10-26-2022 10:26 AM

I dont' think JuJu is here long term.

O.city 10-26-2022 10:28 AM

I also don't understand why the Commanders aren't offloading all they can. They suck and they have a bunch of DL they aren't gonna keep and or pay.

The Franchise 10-26-2022 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16555418)
They could keep all 3 in the event that Hardman becomes too expensive to keep.

They could but I don't see MVS as some amazing WR that needs to be kept around. He'll serve his purpose as a deep threat this season but I'd rather have Cooks considering he's only a year older.

RunKC 10-26-2022 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16555421)
I dont' think JuJu is here long term.

He’s by far our biggest FA to keep IMO. Only guy who is a WR1 on the team.

He’s gonna be valuable as Kelce ages too.

Chris Meck 10-26-2022 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 16555243)
You have to have to believe the owner (or other executive above you) will give you the time you need to rebuild and develop.

I simply don't think most franchises have that.

What teams out there can you say are (a.) hopeless, and (b.) have a person in charge who will patiently allow the coach/GM to trade off parts of the house in order to build and develop a new one?

Patriots with Belichick
Steelers with Tomlin
Jags with Peterson
maaaaaaybe Dennis Allen with the Saints, maybe.

End of list.

Even more than coaches, I think it's an ownership/GM situation.

Does the owner trust the GM to reboot? This may and probably does mean new coaching staff, too.

problem is, if that GM hired the current staff, that's a bit of a problem.

The Franchise 10-26-2022 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16555421)
I dont' think JuJu is here long term.

I think he'd stay if they were willing to pay him. It just is going to depend on what his demands are.

htismaqe 10-26-2022 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16555428)
They could but I don't see MVS as some amazing WR that needs to be kept around. He'll serve his purpose as a deep threat this season but I'd rather have Cooks considering he's only a year older.

MVS is under contract for next season already, though. I don't think they'll part with him.

UChieffyBugger 10-26-2022 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 16555276)
I would love it if we gave up a 4th to get him back. It would increase our chances of winning the Super Bowl enough to justify it without question.

I don't see it happening though given the history. Clark Hunt stated he would never play for the Kansas City Chiefs again so I can't see him going back on that. He could change his mind after so many years but it's not likely.

Why do people keep spreading the bs lie about "Clark said he would never play for KC again" WHEN HE DIDN'T SAY THAT and Veach actually hinted that the door is not closed on Kareem for a return one day? Smh.

Lzen 10-26-2022 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 16555241)
...
A few years ago the Browns GM went all-in on tank mode, accumulated a ton of picks, and they rebuilt that team with a ton of young talent. It was obvious that it was a plan that was agreed upon by ownership. But then they fired the GM anyway, shortly before the team took a gigantic leap forward.

And that's why the Browns are......well......the Browns.

raybec 4 10-26-2022 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16555421)
I dont' think JuJu is here long term.

Why? He took a little less to stay in Pitt because he liked being thee. If he likes it here he may be the type of guy to stay.

Sassy Squatch 10-26-2022 10:36 AM

Juju is almost definitely going to go for the team that offers him the most $$$. He still hasn't signed a long term deal worth big $$$ yet IIRC. As fine as he's been here don't think he's the one I'd tie all that cap up in.

Chris Meck 10-26-2022 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16555424)
I also don't understand why the Commanders aren't offloading all they can. They suck and they have a bunch of DL they aren't gonna keep and or pay.

I think it all depends on this upcoming draft, and how a team views it.

Is an elite QB there? Are you SURE? Is it a guy that's worth staking your career on?

Because, in this league, if you don't have one, you're not getting anywhere.

Under the current rules, the 2000 Ravens don't win a SB. Neither do the '02 Bucs. The game is just different now, the league WANTS the Superstar QB's and is skewing everything towards them dominating.

Good thing we have one.

But if you don't? Literally nothing else is going to matter.

Even with a really good defense, you still have to have a QB that's operating at or very near elite. See Stafford last year.

So for Washington, it's bird in hand if you don't see an elite QB in the '23 draft.

DJ's left nut 10-26-2022 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16555374)
Damn straight. Hughes and Green would help this defensive end group a ton. Not sure you can take on both though.

I'd use Green inside to replace Wharton.

He's listed as an edge but has typically had his best success on the interior.

Rainbarrel 10-26-2022 10:39 AM

Knowmo is an exaggeration, but closer to some truths. The state of Texas that lives and breathes football. Believe the Cowboys are Super Bowl bound every year. Though they usually teeter on stinking.

DJ's left nut 10-26-2022 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TambaBerry (Post 16555406)
Why can't we take on cooks? If Juju plays like he is the rest of the season we can't afford him anyways. Getting a guy like Cooks would be awesome for this offense and its a friendly contract for the next two years.

Ah shit...

His 2023 salary ($18 million) is guaranteed.

Nevermind, I'm out on Cooks. He's a nice enough player, but he's not an $18 million player.

RunKC 10-26-2022 10:42 AM

Yeah I saw what DJ is seeing. I don’t see a way to circumvent that guaranteed money

DJ's left nut 10-26-2022 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16555415)
What makes people think that trading for Cooks would eliminate the possibility of bringing back Juju? If anything....they could get rid of MVS and keep both Cooks AND Juju.

Because Cooks has an $18 million cap figure next year and no incentive at all to lower it because it's guaranteed.

Now his contract has 2 more years on it so you could bonus him out, plow $9 million of it into 2024 and then release him and take the dead cap hit...but why would you want to do that?

I just feel like that guaranteed money next year gives him next to zero actual trade value. He's not an asset on the books anymore at that point.

I knew he had a big number next year but I didn't realize it was a guaranteed figure. That really changes the calculus a lot. Because even if you wanted to bring him back next season, if that's non-guaranteed money you can use that as leverage to get him to renegotiation (because a 30 yr old WR doesn't want to get cast into the FA marketplace).

But since it's guaranteed, he'd have to agree to a new deal just to get out of Texas. I'm not sure he'd be willing to do that.

philfree 10-26-2022 10:46 AM

I just don't see how Cooks would make this team significantly better and then I'm not ready to give up on the guys we have. Cooks does have a better career then I thought but every time I watch him play he underperforms. If we can upgrade the pass rush, I'm all for it but I'm not interested in fixing something that isn't broke. Just keep refining the offense with the WRs we have as well as the TEs who aren't named Kelce.

Couch-Potato 10-26-2022 10:46 AM

If we're going to be players at the deadline, I want impactful additions.


RB: Hunt? Bagh! Forget him, he's a premium backup. Bring me Kamara!!!

WR: Moore was a perfect target, but CAR not willing to move on. Cooks and JuJu are a nice pair, I'm in but I'm not overly impressed with Wood's career production. Claypool might be just a good a fit, brings something different with his size. OBJ? Sure!

DL: Wanted Burns, not gonna happen. Bradley Chubb!?!? Quinn, sure as long as not too expensive. Suh, yes please.

O.city 10-26-2022 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16555451)
I think it all depends on this upcoming draft, and how a team views it.

Is an elite QB there? Are you SURE? Is it a guy that's worth staking your career on?

Because, in this league, if you don't have one, you're not getting anywhere.

Under the current rules, the 2000 Ravens don't win a SB. Neither do the '02 Bucs. The game is just different now, the league WANTS the Superstar QB's and is skewing everything towards them dominating.

Good thing we have one.

But if you don't? Literally nothing else is going to matter.

Even with a really good defense, you still have to have a QB that's operating at or very near elite. See Stafford last year.

So for Washington, it's bird in hand if you don't see an elite QB in the '23 draft.

I would be doing what Philly or the Browns did a few years ago and accumulating as much cap space and as many draft picks as I could until I hit the QB.

Red Dawg 10-26-2022 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16555448)
Juju is almost definitely going to go for the team that offers him the most $$$. He still hasn't signed a long term deal worth big $$$ yet IIRC. As fine as he's been here don't think he's the one I'd tie all that cap up in.

I disagree. I think if we offer a fair deal he will want it and stay here. He doesn't talk like a guy that wants to only be money grubby on a shit team. He rather win and stay with Mahomes.

The Franchise 10-26-2022 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16555465)
Ah shit...

His 2023 salary ($18 million) is guaranteed.

Nevermind, I'm out on Cooks. He's a nice enough player, but he's not an $18 million player.

Didn’t see that before. Give me Hughes and Green then.

New World Order 10-26-2022 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16555424)
I also don't understand why the Commanders aren't offloading all they can. They suck and they have a bunch of DL they aren't gonna keep and or pay.

Rivera and their GM are probably about to get the knife

TambaBerry 10-26-2022 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16555465)
Ah shit...

His 2023 salary ($18 million) is guaranteed.

Nevermind, I'm out on Cooks. He's a nice enough player, but he's not an $18 million player.

The way the wr market went last year 18 million isn't that much for one year. I get it though, we just don't have anything at the position next year.

O.city 10-26-2022 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TambaBerry (Post 16555498)
The way the wr market went last year 18 million isn't that much for one year. I get it though, we just don't have anything at the position next year.

Draft, coach them up. Look for next years JJSS

Balto 10-26-2022 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16555471)
Because Cooks has an $18 million cap figure next year and no incentive at all to lower it because it's guaranteed.

Now his contract has 2 more years on it so you could bonus him out, plow $9 million of it into 2024 and then release him and take the dead cap hit...but why would you want to do that?

I just feel like that guaranteed money next year gives him next to zero actual trade value. He's not an asset on the books anymore at that point.

I knew he had a big number next year but I didn't realize it was a guaranteed figure. That really changes the calculus a lot. Because even if you wanted to bring him back next season, if that's non-guaranteed money you can use that as leverage to get him to renegotiation (because a 30 yr old WR doesn't want to get cast into the FA marketplace).

But since it's guaranteed, he'd have to agree to a new deal just to get out of Texas. I'm not sure he'd be willing to do that.

Meh will we start to see that $18M is actually a good deal. Guys are getting almost $30M this past off season.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.