![]() |
Tyler Boyd: Cincy Bengals are Whiny Deluded Bitches & I'm one of them
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/...chiefs-healthy
CINCINNATI -- Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver Tyler Boyd believes he was the missing factor that kept the team from making back-to-back Super Bowl appearances. In his first day of offseason workouts, the veteran wide receiver met with reporters for the first time since the AFC championship loss to Kansas City, where he suffered a deep thigh bruise early in the second quarter of the 23-20 loss. Boyd said he would have finished the game if he was at least 80% healthy. He said what bothered him the most was the feeling that he let the team down. "Still to this day, I feel like if I would have played the whole game, I was the key factor," Boyd said. "We would've won the game." At the time of the injury, Boyd had two catches for 40 yards. He appeared to suffer the injury following a 24-yard completion. At the end of a big gain, Boyd's left leg was caught beneath Kansas City safety Justin Reid as Reid made the tackle. When Boyd stood up following the play, he immediately favored his left leg. Article continues but is pointless. He goes on to say that landing Orlando Brown Jr. was a victory for them in the rivalry with the Chiefs. God, I hate the Bengals. |
If we didn't have a beat up Mahomes and almost ALL OF OUR RECIEVERS ****ING OUT, it wouldn't even have been close.
|
"If we had 3 premium WRs while they had zero, I think we win that game..."
Okay, Tyler. Cool. Kinda says all that needs be said about your squad, doesn't it? |
PATRICK ****ING MAHOMES WON THE SUPERBOWL ON ONE FOOT.. BOYD IS A PUSSY..
|
I feel for him. He must not have had a father figure in his life growing up that told him "Don't be a pussy Tyler", otherwise when there is a chance to go to the SB you play through it.
|
Quote:
|
It's pretty funny he thinks they lost cause he got hurt, don't mind that even without him that's a top 5 group over there.
|
Quote:
|
I literally hope he dies today
|
The Bills and Bengals should've combined teams, played KC in a dome and waited until Boyd was healthy. Then they could split the Lombardi when their superteam eventually beat the birds and nobody could say they have zero trophies.
|
Quote:
|
I really hate the Bengals. I have a nagging feeling these pr***s will be around for awhile but man I hope we smash their faces over and over again until we break that franchise
|
Quote:
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...7b_480x262.gif |
Quote:
He absorbed the punch from his guy, actualy controlled him, and took him up the arc. Pat kinda put himself in harms way there, though I'm not sure he had much of a choice when Trey Smith got put in his lap. Smith was horribad for the first half of the season or so. Reps like that kinda demonstrate the problems he was creating out there. |
All I’ve gotta say to the guy…
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_KvUsDIr188" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Travis Kelce has never seen this f***ing guy in his life.
|
Quote:
|
I've seen this movie a bunch of times; the popular kids recruit one of the friends from the protaganists' group, not so he can be one of them, so they can haze him and leech information off of him. Sorry Orlando, you're that dude.
|
So what? We were missing our best DB (Sneed)
Hold that L |
Yeah, we were missing 4 WR’s, Sneed, Gay, and had a QB running around on one leg. Boyd can go fist his dog.
|
Patrick Mahomes' Ankle: "I really think me being injured prevented the Chiefs from blowing the Bengals the **** out. That's on me".
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The Bengals can only beat KC if KC hands the game to them...and even then, just barely.
|
Quote:
|
It's funny, but even with a healthy Boyd, there was no game that Cincinnati took. It was more of KC giving the game away.
|
Quote:
And yes. they need all of them just to top them, god forbid we had a real WR1 or a healthy WR core. |
Hitting the copium hard
|
IF the queen had balls she would be the king.
|
Quote:
|
Holy ****ing shit.
1. PR dude needs fired. Players are coached to say nothing at all better than that. 2. I'm trying to remember but I don't think I've ever seen a team be in a dude's head like that. Even before training camp. That's incredible. Mahomes is rent free in bitches' domes. |
Quote:
And Exactly. Burrow couldn't get the W being healthy and with a Top 3 WR Core. Mahomes had one leg, Kelce, MVS, Table Scraps at receiver, a RB with a torn labrum and broken hand, and the 2 most pressure allowing tackles in the NFL. Damn, we're blessed. |
Quote:
Mahomes basically had one leg and an MVS that everyone said wasn't good enough for Aaron Rodgers. |
Player thinks he would have made a difference
Slow news day, huh. |
Loser says what?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This is a low key blast on his own secondary, isn’t it? They couldn’t even stop MVS when that’s basically all Mahomes had besides Kelce (that almost couldn’t play because of his back)
Someone should retweet that nonsense to his secondary |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Meh. CIN also didn't have either starting OT, right? Iirc, CIN was down 3/5 of their starting OL.
I mean, we saw what happened when KC didn't have a serviceable OL in 2020. The Chiefs couldn't even score a TD, and we had most of the starting WR/TEs/RBs available to us. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I hope Bryan Cook hits Boyd so hard this season that when he wakes up he thinks he's back in that game again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I didn’t want Brown at any cost, and said so.
|
Quote:
|
He will spend the next super bowl looking for Bengals SB wins in a bowl of spaghetti os
|
People aren't even close to the chiefs.
|
Quote:
regardless, whether they're 'exactly the same' isn't really the point. The point is that losing more than half your starting OL will make a difference in how well your offense executes, n'est-ce pas? CIN went into the AFFCG last year without the OL they had when they played us in the regular season, fact. it probably made a real difference in how they executed. Just as losing 4/5 of our OL in 2020 changed how our offense operated. Fine, maybe not in exactly the same way, but in both cases the loss of several starters on the OL hurt each team's ability to execute as well as they did when they had those starters. |
As dislikable as the Bengals may be, I am sure everyone here would love to meet the Cincinnati mayor at the George Brett statue. That moron really put his foot in his mouth. They seem to have more than their fair share of stooges in Cincinnati. Stooges
|
Quote:
Tampa Bay. Also when KC lost to the Bucs, they were playing a team at full strength with three top WRs of which one is a HOFer and the other would have gone down as a Top 5 WR ever if he wasn't insane (Evans, Brown, Godwin). They also had one of the greatest TEs ever (Gronkowski), a top 5 pick RB who's career had been resurrected (Fournette), and an elite OLine. Cincinnati lost to a QB who was hobbled by a high ankle sprain, a TE dealing with back issues, and by the end of the game, MVS, Moore, and just brought up from the practice squad Kemp with two turnstiles at T. Oh and a 7th round RB dealing with two injuries. Cincy still had a healthy QB that most consider to be the second best in the NFL, two #1 WRs, Mixon, Perine, and Henry and still lost. KC played a much stronger overall team in that SB than Cincy did in the AFCCG. The Chiefs offense had to fire on all cylinders to keep up with that Bucs team. Cincy could not outscore a KC offense decimated by injuries and yet them being down three linemen was the equivalent to KCs SB loss? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ah, now I get it. No, I didn't say it was equivalent. I said losing several starters along your OL would change how well the team executed its offense, and I used the KC SBLV team as an obvious example of how that's true. There's several other examples, but i know everyone remembers that team/game, so that's the one i used. You're getting into the actual results of a particular game. I'm simply referring to a well-known game, but my point is just that losing several starters from an OL will necessarily reduce that team's efficiency on offense. And we almost didn't win that game. In the end, it took a slow start by CIN, a pair of uncharacteristic INTs by Burrow, a career performance from MVS, and it literally took a great return from a much-maligned rookie WR and a terrible roughing penalty for KC to win that game. Terrible as in, what was Ossai thinking??? Look, I'm not making excuses for CIN, I just noticed that no one seemed to remember that they weren't at their best either. We beat them yes, but that wasn't the same team we faced earlier in the season. They were a little banged up in the AFCCG. |
Those bitches woulda got ROLLED by Philly. We did them a favor and helped them not get blown out in a SB. Imagine needing 3 #1’s to beat the team that beat you with MVS and a bunch of 5 and 6’s! Embarrassing! How many quarterbacks have made it back to the SB after losing their first?? Single digits….
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
they lost Boyd but we were down to Marcus Kemp lol |
Quote:
It took a lot for Cincy to even be in that game. If memory serves me wasn't one INT called back and another dropped? Cincinnati got lucky that went their way. Pacheco had a TD called back on a very weak, questionable hold as well. If anything Cincinnati was fortunate it wasn't a blowout. KC had to make adjustments that the Bengals could not. They may not have been at their best, but they were still far healthier than KC, especially at the one position that mattered most. |
Do people not realize Smith was one of the best pass blockers in the NFL in 2021?
Last year, he battled through injuries all year long. He was, admittedly, not good. The Chiefs are betting on health and a bounce back year. I like the bet. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Well, yeah. I was never disagreeing with your argument about how things shook out. i agree with almost all of it. |
Quote:
:toast: |
Quote:
|
Did the Bungles do anything with their interior line? Burrow is going be a whipping post. He will lead the league in getting sacked again.
|
Boyd, Hilton & Burrow drink Bud Light & shop at Target.
|
The wildest thing I heard is after 3 years, Chase is still the youngest receiver on their roster. Even with the rookies.
|
Quote:
Regular Season Stats: 2022 Orlando allowed 2.765 pressures per game 2022 Wylie allowed 2.88 pressures per game 2022 (Mostly Injured) Donovan allowed 2.385 pressures per game 2021 (Healthy) Donovan allowed 1.765 pressures per game. Pressure numbers are from PFF. I think he'll fit in just fine. Not to mention how Mahomes Pressure to Sack Ratio makes his Oline even better (Somewhere around 11% for his career I believe while no other QB in that timespan is lower than 14.5% or something like that, trying to find the stat on that). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't think he's better, I think that data concludes he's an effective pass blocker, ESPECIALLY when healthy. Don't get me wrong, he has penalty issues, and that very well could come back to bite us, but a lot of people are acting as if this is a significant drop off when it's minor at most in my opinion. Breaking down Pressure to snap ratio, OBJ allowed pressure on 6.5% of snaps in 22, and 5.0% of snaps in 21, compared to 5.22% and 3.9% respectively for Smith (Regular Season numbers) He's nowhere as effective a run blocker as OBJ in my opinion, but that can still work with our offense. On the whole, he has allowed less pressures per opportunity than OBJ the last 2 years (even with the hyperextended elbow and foot problems). And don't get me wrong, part of that can be scheming, but I trust Heck and Andy here to bring the best out of him, injured or not. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hope Boyd keeps up the talk...until next time.
Quote:
|
Quote:
“You know, we have a nice little rivalry with the Chiefs and to see him come over, you know, it’s like, yeah, we one-upped y’all." Yep, shitty LT's they sure did. We'll take the Lombardi's. |
Quote:
The pressures just don't check out. They don't align with anything else that team did. The sack rate, the pass block win rates - none of them make sense if you also conclude that the Chiefs were abysmal at giving up pressures from OT. But if you think those pressure figures were inflated by maybe 1/3, suddenly everything else lines out pretty sensibly, right down to Brown being better than Smith last season (when he undeniably was better than a hobbled Smith). I just don't put much stock in the pressure numbers. They're too subjective and I've seen PFF graders get hard-ons for guys too many times in the past to believe that it couldn't have happened here. I noticed it back in 2012/2013 when PFF wrote a pre-season article about how great Rob Ninkovich was. Then low and behold, the 2012 season happens and what do you know, Rob Ninkovich was a monster by PFF's grading! Meanwhile Chandler Jones goes out there and gets 13 sacks and is considered barely a fringe average pass rusher according to PFF. These 'graders' are simply not above confirmation bias. And it shows time and time again. I absolutely think that's what happened with the pressures surrendered by Brown and Wylie. You just can't have the kind of pass rush win rates they had and still have the poor pressure rates they had. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.