Im confused about his hair does he have it back or is it receding that bad?

Now now, no need to be racist

those two don't deserve anything other than cyanide showers.

Dedicated father stuff right there....

I think you might need to learn to read, actually. Here's the scoop:

The appeals court ruled Thursday that sufficient evidence of abuse or neglect existed. Court records state that both parents were victims of childhood abuse and both are unemployed and suffering from unspecified physical and psychological disabilities.

Neither Campbell has been adequately treated for their psychological conditions, court records said....

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/1...n_1035040.html

It looks like his hair is slicked back instead of cut properly short. I question his commitment to fascism.

Your scoop doesn't say anything different. The original case when the children were taken away found sufficient evidence of abuse or neglect. And the appeals court justified the original decision. Some of the reasoning included that the parents were victims of abuse themselves as children, they were unemployed, and suffering from psychological disabilities.

How is that questionable at all?

I assume you're joking here. The whole question I posed is, "did they break the law"? Putting aside for a moment that if we applied that standard to all parents, about 1/2 of us would lose our kids immediately.....what did the parents do to abuse the kids?

When you read the story closer you find out they didn't abuse the kids. The Stqate just didn't want them around the parents. Let's be honest what happened. Being dumb or poor or bigoted or a victim of abuse would, again, eliminate millions of folks from parenthood.

JFC. I'm not sure how much more clear it can be made.

No shit, unemployed huh? Can’t imagine why.

Why are you being intolerant of their beliefs?

I'm not sure that naming your children Adolf Hitler and Aryan Nation is an act of loving and caring parenting. They basically doomed those kids to a life of humiliation and difficulty until they can get old enough to change their name legally.

Nazism is so 1938

Obviously the parents are kooks but the story here is whether the State can legitimately claim the children were being abused. Having an idiot or a bigot for a parent is not a legitimate reason to remove somebody's own children from them. (If it were, everyone in America would be at risk).

Abuse and neglect are crimes. What part of "sufficient evidence" are you unable to comprehend?