BIG SMILE! New Jersey Nazi Heads Off To Family Court
 

I think he needs a teapot from J.C. Penny....

http://tinyurl.com/lccgsgn

Heath Campbell entered a New Jersey courthouse Monday dressed in a full Nazi uniform, donning a trimmed mustache reminiscent of Adolf Hitler -- the man he named his firstborn child after.

The 40-year-old dad was attending a hearing to ask for visitation rights to his youngest child, 2-year-old Heinrich Hons, who was taken into state custody just hours after his birth in 2011.

Henrich's three Nazi-named siblings -- Adolf Hitler, 7, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation, 6, and 5-year-old Honzlynn Jeannie -- had already been placed in foster care in 2009. The move came a month after the family gained national attention when a ShopRite refused to write "Happy Birthday Adolf Hitler" on a birthday cake.

On Monday before the hearing, Campbell told NBC10, "The world needs to see who I am," when asked what his strategy was in wearing the controversial outfit. "I'm going to tell the judge, I love my children. I wanna be a father, let me be it."

In August 2010, an appeals court ruled that evidence of domestic violence justified the state's decision to remove the children from the Campbell home, according to ABC News.

A year ago, a New Jersey Superior Court judge decided Campbell and his wife, Deborah -- who've since separated -- could not have their children back.

Campbell has always maintained that his kids were taken solely because of their names.

"These kids weren’t abused," he told The Star-Ledger after the 2012 decision, adding, "If I have to give up my Nazism, then so be it. I’ll do it."

A month later, he created a new Nazi organization, "Hitler's Order," according to NBC10, and began wearing the uniform.

Campbell originally told The Associated Press in 2008 that he named his son after Adolf Hitler because he liked the name and "no one else in the world would have [it]."

The media were not allowed inside the court room because of New Jersey family court proceedings policy.

Why were his kids taken? Did he break a law or something?

Classy...

http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/5...thcampbell.jpg

Read...

Hope he doesn't draw Goldstein for a judge

I hate New Jersey Nazis....

Neo Jersey?

That happened AFTER his kids were taken away.

Swastika neck tattoo: Fad or fashion?

Apparently you didn't read it either.

They "Justified" the state's decision at that time. It was appeals court.

Fixed

Me too, although they aren't as bad as Illinois NAZIs.

Picture yourself as the judge. These two are standing in front of you arguing that they are fit to raise children.

I couldn't keep a straight face.

pretty clearly. Read the article.

Im confused about his hair does he have it back or is it receding that bad?

Now now, no need to be racist

those two don't deserve anything other than cyanide showers.

Dedicated father stuff right there....

I think you might need to learn to read, actually. Here's the scoop:

The appeals court ruled Thursday that sufficient evidence of abuse or neglect existed. Court records state that both parents were victims of childhood abuse and both are unemployed and suffering from unspecified physical and psychological disabilities.

Neither Campbell has been adequately treated for their psychological conditions, court records said....

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/1...n_1035040.html

It looks like his hair is slicked back instead of cut properly short. I question his commitment to fascism.

Your scoop doesn't say anything different. The original case when the children were taken away found sufficient evidence of abuse or neglect. And the appeals court justified the original decision. Some of the reasoning included that the parents were victims of abuse themselves as children, they were unemployed, and suffering from psychological disabilities.

How is that questionable at all?

I assume you're joking here. The whole question I posed is, "did they break the law"? Putting aside for a moment that if we applied that standard to all parents, about 1/2 of us would lose our kids immediately.....what did the parents do to abuse the kids?

When you read the story closer you find out they didn't abuse the kids. The Stqate just didn't want them around the parents. Let's be honest what happened. Being dumb or poor or bigoted or a victim of abuse would, again, eliminate millions of folks from parenthood.

JFC. I'm not sure how much more clear it can be made.

No shit, unemployed huh? Can’t imagine why.

Why are you being intolerant of their beliefs?

I'm not sure that naming your children Adolf Hitler and Aryan Nation is an act of loving and caring parenting. They basically doomed those kids to a life of humiliation and difficulty until they can get old enough to change their name legally.

Nazism is so 1938

Obviously the parents are kooks but the story here is whether the State can legitimately claim the children were being abused. Having an idiot or a bigot for a parent is not a legitimate reason to remove somebody's own children from them. (If it were, everyone in America would be at risk).

Abuse and neglect are crimes. What part of "sufficient evidence" are you unable to comprehend?

The judge should have done an imitation of Freisler:

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aNi5256dhvM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Wha? You think it might be a detriment to their future prospects?
I was assuming they were headed for lucrative careers in the PR biz, or maybe as accountants since I’m sure all the too big to fail banks would be knocking each other over to be the first to hire Adolf Hitler and Aryan Nation.

LMAO He's got a point.

I'm sure that colleges will be falling all over themselves to admit these kids, too.

"Okay, let's look at Adolf Hitler's application. Mmm-hmmm. 3.5 GPA, active in the FFA, volunteered at church. Mmm-hmmm. Okay, who's next?"

If the idiot parents want to make a statement they shouldn't damage their children to do it. I notice that they didn't change their own names to reflect their ... beliefs or whatever.

"Yeah, but he can't paint humans worth shit!"

ok, that shit was funny.:thumb:

I'd like to know what "abuse" was committed. If you're going to accept sufficient-evidence on it's face, that's your deal but I'd like a wee bit more color.



The fact they didn't release it, makes me believe it doesn't exist. Because if it did, they'd obviously release it.

:facepalm:

They would? Why?

Oh, hey. I just got that.

so the guy is a moron and idiot. but why did his kids get taken away?

is the name considered abuse by the courts?

They can't legally take the kids away because they're neo nazis and named them such and have psychological problems, and even the domestic violence thing....that's between ma and pa.

however they're unemployed and therefore deadbeats. **** deadbeat parents.

It's amazing this guy can't find work.....

he shoulda stuck to painting dead people. woulda been more considerably inspired works of art

I'm as libertarian as anyone around here. Well, maybe not, but I'm pretty libertarian. However, I could buy an argument that these parents are running a cult and these kids are being forced to be part of it. Their behavior is beyond "pleasantly eccentric" or even "weird". It's destructive.

Achtung Baby
http://media.u2.com/non_secure/image...htungb/600.jpg

Let's put it this way,

The Westboro Church parents get to keep their kids. These assholes don't. Therefore, they must have done something worse than Westboro.

So you're saying they're almost as bad as Democrats?














(And.... off to DC!)

On a serious note, there's something off about this case, and I'm not talking about the parents:

http://www.imperfectparent.com/topic...abuse-charges/

outside of the single solitary domestic violence charge I'm not finding a difference

maybe Tax exempt assholes > Tax paying assholes (if tax paying assholes were employed), there's that i guess

2011, bruh. I'm guessing things may have changed since that time.

The importance of that link is that they were found not guilty of child abuse and still not given their children back.

Gag order makes it pretty difficult to answer the question as to what they've done. I gave the court the benefit of the doubt as a result.