(Collective) Your "bad wiring" is way more harmful to society than the wiring that makes people gay or straight or bi.

Again, I'm not shy about pointing out the biological facts. There is one, and only one, reason we have male and female... Feel free to dispute it.

Feel free to expound.

To what end are you attempting to make this distinction or point out specific "wiring" as "bad?" What makes it such an important topic?

No other point than pointing out a fact. You didn't know that already?

That's actually a pretty good argument. Who knows if nature has some sort of contingency plan built in that is, perhaps, stimulating homosexual behavior in an effort to stem wild population growth? In that case it's not faulty or defective at all, but intended. It's kind of like the frogs in Jurassic Park.

Why must you point out this "fact" (which is based completely on shit that you've thought up in your own brain, and not any sort of scientific research -- good and bad being wholly subjective concepts and science having absolutely zero concern with personal beliefs) so insistently? What makes it important to point it out, obnoxiously, over and over again with a shit-eating grin on your face like you just won a high school debate?

You're like, "BOOM MOTHER****ERS, WHAT ABOUT THIS!!! Sorry, did I blow your mindsssss? DEAL WITH IT!" and I'm all, "What the **** is wrong with you?"

:spock:

Do I really need scientific research to tell me (and you) that homosexuals have bad wiring (or an abnormality if you prefer)? I can understand you not liking my pointing it out, but that doesn't mean I'm incorrect.

I brought it up in this thread because someone mentioned equality.

What makes this arbitrary shit that popped into your brain relevant or interesting? What makes it "fact?" Most importantly: what does it have to do with a cultural institution that has existed in innumerable forms over the course of the past several millennia? Marriage is a malleable societal concept, not a specific natural phenomenon. What nature "intended"* has **** all to do with it.

*And again, "nature" is a descriptor of the various interacting systems that make up the world around us. It is not an active entity, and it has no "intentions" beyond "____ happens and that causes ____."

Because someone mentioned equality in this thread (again).

Wasn't there a huge uproar a few weeks ago about someone referencing a member's mentally challenged child? Does Trisomy 21 qualify as bad wiring?

It might be helpful if you'd actually refrain from hitting Submit Reply until you have all your thoughts typed out. Jeez.

I've already explained why it is fact. Nature/God/whatever gave homosexuals the organs to copulate and breed with members of the opposite sex and the desire to copulate with the same sex, which cannot lead to procreation. That's dictated by Nature/God/whatever. Those are facts. Feel free to prove otherwise.

I don't know why your bringing up marriage (if that what you are bringing up). I haven't mentioned it.

Trying to understand your ultimate point here. Are you saying gays don't deserve to be treated as equal because they are biologically "flawed" as you say? Even if we were to consider them flawed, that same logic (biological flaw) could be used against other segments of the population for the same reason, segments that you would probably consider to be deserving of being treated as equal.

Bloo bloo, I expanded my post two minutes after replying to your dumb, stale horseshit. I hope it didn't make you strain too hard to click "reply" again.

Sweet disingenuousness~

Certainly the ability to marry a partner of your own mutual choosing is not a matter of equality! Also, my conception of "nature" is Stone Cold Fact and anyone who disagrees is a naive rube! *repeats post 7000 times*

I really don't have an ultimate point, other than to point out that heterosexuals and homosexuals are not equal, specifically when it comes to the propagation of the species.